1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods and systems for laser soft marking, especially for semiconductor wafers and devices.
2. Background Art
Lasers have been used for laser marking semiconductor wafers for decades. A listing of representative patents and publications generally related to laser marking is now provided. U.S. Pat. No. 5,329,090 relates to dot marking of wafers. The following representative patent references relate to various aspects of laser marking of wafers and electronic assemblies, illumination, and inspection/reading marks: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,522,656; 4,945,204; 6,309,943; 6,262,388; 5,929,997; 5,690,846; 5,894,530; 5,737,122; and Japanese Patent Abstract 11135390.
The following representative references provide general information on various laser marking methods and system configurations and components: “Galvanometric and Resonant Low Inertia Scanners”, Montagu, in Laser Beam Scanning, Marcel-Dekker, 1985, pp. 214-216; “Marking Applications now Encompass Many Materials”, Hayes, in Laser Focus World, February 1997, pp. 153-160; “Commercial Fiber Lasers Take on Industrial Markets”, Laser Focus World, May 1997, pp. 143-150. Patent Publications: WO 96/16767, WO 98/53949, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,965,042; 5,942,137; 5,932,119; 5,719,372; 5,635,976; 5,600,478; 5,521,628; 5,357,077; 4,985,780; 4,945,204; 4,922,077; 4,758,848; 4,734,558; 4,856,053; 4,323,755; 4,220,842; 4,156,124.
Published Patent Applications WO 0154854, publication date Aug. 2, 2001, entitled “Laser Scanning Method and System for Marking Articles such as Printed Circuit Boards, Integrated Circuits, and the Like” and WO 0161275, published on Aug. 23, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Automatically Generating Reference Height Data for use in a Three-Dimensional Inspection System” are both assigned to the assignee of the present invention. Both applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The visibility of laser marks as seen by a vision system (or by operator visual inspection) may depend on several factors including mark depth, debris, etc. which in turn depend on laser material-interaction. For certain wafer marking applications the conventional wisdom leads to relatively large marking depths which may provide for good readability, but increasing susceptibility to subsurface damage.
Wafer marking systems have long been provided by the assignee of the present invention. WaferMark™ system, produced by the assignee of the present invention for several years, is believed to be the first industrial laser marking system on silicon wafer. Specifications include a 120 μm marking dot diameter hard marking for 300 nm wafers. This meets the SEMI standard specification M1.15. A “soft marking specification” exists for wafer back side soft marking, including marking rough surface back side wafers up to 200 mm wafer. On the “Sigma Clean” system, a backside-marking option is provided for both front and backside marking for up to 200 mm wafer.
There are roughly two kinds of laser marks currently used by the industry, namely soft marks and hard marks. Various marking systems for producing both “hard marks” and “soft marks” are manufactured by the assignee of the present invention. One such currently available system is the GSILumonics Wafermark® Sigma Clean® is used to produce a type of softmark called Supersoftmark®. This mark is generally characterized as “debris free”. These marks are typically produced with diode pumped, q-switched pulse laser systems. Such Supersoftmarks® are produced with the laser system typically operating in a narrow “energy window”, a range of energies having an upper limit and lower limit wherein acceptable marking occurs.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,522,656, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, is the foundation of the current laser technology for soft marks. It describes a method which is characterized by the steps of irradiating by means of a laser pulse, a surface segment which has a surface area corresponding to 1.5 times to 6.5 times the surface area of the desired surface pattern, and adjusting the energy of the laser pulse so that only in the center of the surface segment, and on a surface corresponding to the surface pattern, the semiconductor material is melted and partially vaporized. The pattern generated usually has, relative to the original semiconductor surface, a raised annular rim and a recessed center, as shown in
According to U.S. Pat. No. 4,522,656, the depth of the recess can be controlled by energy density, i.e., the depth of the recess will be increased if there is a corresponding increase of the energy density in the center of the pulse.
It is well known, however, that the process window for the energy density for generating such marks (commonly known as the super soft marks) is very small. Therefore, the adjustment of the depth of the recessed area by changing the energy density on the part is very limited. In addition, there are certain depth ranges that cannot be achieved by simply adjusting the energy or energy density.
For example, one can increase the laser energy from 970 μj to 980 μj to get the upper energy limit of the super soft mark, shown in
As the semiconductor fabrication technologies evolve, soft marks on wafers with different mark depths are required to accommodate the new processes. It is, therefore, very desirable to have a laser marking technique that provides easy adjustment for the marking depth of the super soft marks.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved method and system for laser soft marking, especially for semiconductor wafers and devices.
In carrying out the above object and other objects of the present invention, a laser-marking method of marking a semiconductor wafer to form a softmark on the wafer is provided. The method includes setting a laser pulse width of one or more laser pulses to selectively provide one or more laser output pulses having one or more set pulse widths that affect the depth of a softmark that is to be formed. The mark depth is substantially dependent on the one or more set pulse widths. The method further includes setting a pulse energy of the one or more output pulses to selectively provide the one or more output pulses having a set total output energy that is within an acceptable process energy window for producing the softmark. The method still further includes delivering the one or more output pulses having the one or more set pulse widths and the set total output energy into a region of the wafer such that energy density within the region, as determined by the one or more set pulse widths and the set total output energy, modifies wafer material and thereby produces the softmark having the mark depth within a predetermined range.
The mark depth may be substantially proportional to a pulse width over a substantial range of pulse widths.
The mark depth may be in the range of about 1 micron to 6 microns.
The mark depth may be predetermined and formed with exactly one output pulse.
The mark depth may be finer than about 1 micron.
Energy in a single output pulse may be in a typical range of about 600 microjoules to about 1100 microjoules.
The acceptable process energy window may be centered on a central energy in a typical range having a lower limit of about 10 microjoules less than the central energy and an upper limit about 10 microjoules above the central energy.
An output pulse may have a typical set pulse width in the range of about 10 nanoseconds to about 200 nanoseconds.
The step of setting the laser pulse width may be performed subsequent to the step of setting the pulse energy.
The step of setting the pulse energy may be performed subsequent to the step of setting the laser pulse width.
The steps of setting may be performed substantially simultaneously.
Further in carrying out the above object and other objects of the present invention, a laser-marking system for marking a semiconductor wafer to form a softmark on the wafer is provided. The system includes a laser subsystem for generating one or more laser pulses and a controller operatively connected to the laser subsystem. The controller sets a laser pulse width of the one or more laser pulses to selectively provide one or more laser output pulses having one or more set pulse widths that affect the depth of a softmark that is to be formed. The mark depth is substantially dependent on the one or more set pulse widths. The controller further sets a pulse energy of the one or more output pulses to selectively provide the one or more output pulses having a set total output energy that is within an acceptable process energy window for producing the softmark. The system further includes a beam delivery system that includes an optical subsystem for delivering the one or more output pulses having the one or more set pulse widths and the set total output energy into a region of the wafer such that energy density within the region, as determined by the one or more set pulse widths and the set total pulse energy, modifies wafer material and thereby produces the softmark having the mark depth within a predetermined range.
The controller may include a subsystem of electronic components and a control program that is generally used for marking system control.
The controller may further include a subsystem of electronic components and a control program that is dedicated to control of the laser subsystem.
The laser subsystem may include a fiber-based laser having a tunable pulse width.
Yet still further in carrying out the above object and other objects of the present invention, a laser-marking method of forming a softmark on a semiconductor wafer is provided. The method includes setting a temporal characteristic of at least a portion of a pulsed laser output that affects depth of a softmark to be formed with the laser output. The method further includes setting total output energy of the pulsed laser output to correspond to energy within an acceptable process energy window so as to form the softmark on the semiconductor wafer.
The steps of setting may be performed prior to marking a batch of wafers. The temporal characteristic and the total output energy may remain set during marking of the entire batch.
The steps of setting may be performed subsequent to positioning a wafer at a marking station, and prior to marking a single wafer.
The steps of setting may be performed subsequent to positioning a wafer at a marking station and prior to marking a single wafer. The temporal characteristic and the total output energy may be varied to produce softmarks having different predetermined depths on the wafer.
The steps of setting may be performed by a laser-marking system, and the temporal characteristic and the total output energy may be set at a manufacturing site of the laser-marking system or at a site where the laser-marking system is installed.
Further in carrying out the above object and other objects of the present invention, a laser-marking method of forming a softmark on a semiconductor wafer is provided. The method includes setting one or more laser pulse widths of one or more laser pulses. The one or more set pulse widths affect depth of the softmark to be formed with the one or more laser pulses. The method further includes setting total output energy of the one or more laser pulses. The set total output energy corresponds to energy within an acceptable process energy window to form the softmark on the semiconductor wafer.
Embodiments of the present invention may generally be used to produce either softmarks or supersoftmarks®.
One aspect of the invention features a semiconductor wafer having a softmark. The mark may generally be in a range of about 1 micron to about 6 microns. In at least one embodiment of the present invention a softmark-depth may be finer than about 1 micron.
The above object and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
a and 3b schematically illustrate, by way of example, a laser cavity (
a-4c illustrate exemplary temporal pulse characteristics of a burst of pulses, and shows an expanded view of one or more pulses within a burst;
Based on experimental results, the inventors realize that laser pulse width has much more impact on the mark depth than the energy or energy density does in a method and system of an embodiment of the present invention.
The graph of
The laser energy, and corresponding energy density, used in embodiments of the present invention will generally be based on wafer optical properties. In many cases the wafers will be bare and polished. The wafer may be polished so as to conform to a surface roughness standard. The surface reflectance can be expected to vary from batch to batch, and possibly over a wafer. Oxidation can lead to a requirement for adjustment of the incident energy. Typically the incident energy will be in a range of about 600 microjoules-1100 microjoules (e.g.: nearly a 2:1 variation).
Preferably the marking will occur at the position of best focus at each marking location over a marking field. However, the marking may also occur at positions other than best focus and may occur with off-normal incident marking beams.
Preferably, a laser pulse width will be easy to set, and may be programmable. One such example is a fiber laser from IPG Photonics that is used by the assignee of the present invention in certain M430 memory repair systems. Laser pulse widths can be selected over a continuous range from 4 ns to 20 ns. In at least one preferred embodiment a mark depth, a corresponding laser pulse width, or laser output energy laser pulse width may be selected through the use of the user interface provided with the marking system.
Published U.S. patent application 2004/0188399, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, discloses various laser system embodiments useable for creating or removing a feature on a surface. By way of example, a MOPA system having a fiber optic amplifier is disclosed. The laser processing system may include an output sub-system having an A-O modulator. The MOPA and output modulator are controlled to selectively direct one or more laser pulses to the target material based on position information. Each of the output pulses incident of the surface may have a different pulsewidth.
Another way to set a pulse width is to adjust the laser cavity geometry and dimensions, as well as the reflectivity of the output coupler.
Another way to set a pulse width is to take advantage of a common laser characteristic, i.e., the pulse width decreases with the increase of the laser energy. So in order to achieve shallower mark depth, one can run the laser to a higher pulse energy level to obtain the needed pulse width, and then externally attenuate the beam to achieve the required energy density to get the super soft marks.
One may also exploit another common laser characteristic, i.e., the pulse width increases with the repetition rate of the laser. Operating the laser at a higher repetition rate (thus, a longer pulse width), will give rise to a deeper mark depth for a given energy density.
Commercially available q-switched, diode pumped laser systems include provisions for adjusting the repetition rate. Such models are available from Lightwave Electronics and Spectra Physics. In some embodiments, the laser systems may be combined with an output attenuator to control the total energy on the surface.
Therefore, commercially available laser technology can be adapted to carry out numerous embodiments of the present invention. The laser system may be q-switched or gain switched, and various combinations thereof.
In certain embodiments various temporal laser output characteristics may be set to affect mark depth, and the total laser output energy is also to be set within an acceptable process energy window. For instance, the laser system may be operated in a “burst mode”. The burst may generally be characterized with an envelope that is slowly varying with respect to a waveform or sequence of pulses within the envelope. The corresponding pulsed laser output used to form the softmark may be such a burst of pulses, and the temporal characteristic may be at least one of a burst width, burst envelope shape, burst duration, temporal spacing between bursts, a pulse width, temporal spacing between two or more pulses, temporal overlap between two or more pulses, a set delay between at least two pulses, and a pulse shape.
a-4c illustrate exemplary temporal pulse characteristics the may be set in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Numerous references teach “burst mode” operation, pulse shaping, pulse stretching, pulse delay, and pulse selection. For instance, published U.S. patent application 2002/0167581 (at least
In practice, the pulse temporal characteristics and energy may be set for a lot or batch wafers, without a requirement for further adjustment. Future requirements may lead to setting of the pulse characteristics for marking different depths within a field. The surface variations of the wafers lead to a requirement for “process studies” to determine the laser output energy requirement, and such variations generally determine the frequency of such measurements. Preferably, the laser marking system includes detection and calibration hardware and software to perform any needed process studies with minimum operator intervention.
Embodiments of the present invention are typically used for “dot” formats on a first side of the wafer may be polished to a standard. Various embodiments of the present invention may be integrated with the series of marking products produced by the assignee of the present invention, for instance the GSILumonics Wafermark® Sigma Clean®.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/627,760, filed Nov. 11, 2004. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/438,501, filed May 15, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4156124 | Macken et al. | May 1979 | A |
4220842 | Sturmer et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4261919 | Knowles et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4323755 | Nierenberg | Apr 1982 | A |
4522656 | Kuhn-Kuhnenfeld et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4734558 | Nakano et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4758848 | Nakano | Jul 1988 | A |
4856053 | Hashimoto | Aug 1989 | A |
4922077 | Gordon | May 1990 | A |
4945204 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4985780 | Garnier et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5329090 | Woelki et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5357077 | Tsuruta | Oct 1994 | A |
5521628 | Montgomery | May 1996 | A |
5600478 | Stevens | Feb 1997 | A |
5635976 | Thuren et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5690846 | Okada et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5719372 | Togari et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737122 | Wilt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5894530 | Wilt | Apr 1999 | A |
5903537 | Gage et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929997 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
5932119 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942137 | Kamir et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949584 | White et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965042 | Saitoh | Oct 1999 | A |
5969374 | Toh | Oct 1999 | A |
6130402 | Abella et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160568 | Brodsky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6231196 | Mahachek | May 2001 | B1 |
6248973 | Matsumura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261382 | Marx et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261919 | Omizo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262388 | Canella et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281471 | Smart | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309943 | Glenn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340806 | Smart et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6437454 | Chiba et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6483071 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489985 | Brodsky et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495791 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6573473 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6639177 | Ehrmann et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662063 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6703582 | Smart et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727458 | Smart | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6774340 | Chiba et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777641 | Cole et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777645 | Ehrmann et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6951995 | Couch et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6972268 | Ehrmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989508 | Ehrmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015418 | Cahill et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027155 | Cordingley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7119351 | Woelki | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7148447 | Ehrmann et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7176407 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192846 | Cordingley et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7358157 | Gu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20010038153 | Sakaguchi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020167581 | Cordingley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030160034 | Filgas et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040060910 | Schramm | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040134896 | Gu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144760 | Cahill et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040188399 | Smart | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050018738 | Duan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050199598 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233537 | Couch et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060000814 | Gu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028655 | Cordingley et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060086702 | Smart | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060151704 | Cordingley | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186096 | Schramm | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189091 | Gu | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191884 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192845 | Cordingley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199354 | Gu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060205121 | Couch et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207975 | Ehrmann et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216927 | Cordingley et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060256181 | Ehrmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070031993 | Nemets et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052791 | Cordingley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075058 | Ehrmann et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106416 | Griffiths et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117227 | Gu | May 2007 | A1 |
20070173075 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178714 | Gu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199927 | Gu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215575 | Gu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215820 | Cordingley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011852 | Gu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035614 | Smart | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080067155 | Gu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073438 | Gu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094640 | Cordingley et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2-59188 | Feb 1990 | JP |
6-120096 | Apr 1994 | JP |
6-148026 | May 1994 | JP |
11135390 | May 1999 | JP |
2000-21696 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2002-164264 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-178172 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002164264 | Jun 2002 | JP |
WO 9616767 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9853949 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 0154854 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0161275 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060108337 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60627760 | Nov 2004 | US |