Patent Grant
8539392
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates in general to a method for compensating proximity effects of lithography processes, and more particularly to a method for compensating proximity effects of particle beam lithography processes.
2. Description of the Related Art
Lithography technology, which plays a very important role in the semiconductor manufacturing process, must be conformed to new generation circuit design rules otherwise the development in the semiconductor industry will be hindered. In recent years, the integrated circuit design rules are directed towards miniaturization. Therefore, lithography technology, which is crucial to the effectiveness of patterning fidelity, must take the trend of miniaturization into consideration and require tremendous efforts in terms of labor, resources, capital and time in the development of exposing equipment, the establishment of manufacturing processes, the fabrication of masks and the application of relevant technologies.
The conventional lithography system mainly includes an item of optical lithography equipment. In terms of a deep ultra violet (DUV) light source, the resolution has much to do with the wavelength of the light source, and has a limit. Therefore, the development of lithography technology is gradually directed towards the electron beam, X-ray, extreme ultra violet (EUV) light, ion beam and so on.
The electron beam lithography technology is based on the concept of a scanning election microscope (SEM). The wavelength of the electron beam of the lithography technology is only several thousandth of the deep ultra violet light, hence producing excellent resolution. In order to make for the inadequacy in the resolution of an optical lithography system, electron beam lithography technology is also used in the direct writing of a wafer for directly printing the pattern on a photosensitive material disposed on a wafer surface.
The invention is directed to a method for compensating proximity effects of particle beam lithography processes. The method is performed by several recursive adjusting means, such that the difference between an actual pattern and a target pattern can be fitted in with a target value range.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, a method for compensating proximity effects of particle beam lithography processes is provided. The method comprises (a) providing a control pattern consisted of a set of control boundaries; (b) providing a dissection process, wherein the dissection process produces a set of points according to an import pattern which is composed of a set of boundaries, and the set of the boundaries pass through the set of the points; (c) providing a set of control points produced according to the dissection process and the control pattern, wherein the set of the control boundaries pass through the set of the control points; (d) defining the control pattern as being an input pattern of the lithography process; (e) providing a target pattern consisted of a set of target boundaries; (f) providing a set of target points produced according to the dissection process and the target pattern, the set of the target boundaries passing through the set of the target points; (g) providing a set of target measurement values, wherein the set of the target measurement values are obtained from the set of the target points and the set of the target boundaries; (h) defining an actual pattern consisted of a set of actual boundaries; (i) providing a set of actual measurement values, wherein the actual measurement values are obtained from the set of the target points and the set of the actual boundaries; (j) calculating a set of comparison values according to the set of the target measurement values and the set of the actual measurement values; (k) providing an adjusting strategy; (l) producing a corrected pattern according to the set of the comparison values and the adjusting strategy, the corrected pattern consisted of a set of corrected boundaries and the set of the corrected boundaries passing through the set of the control points; and (m) defining the corrected pattern as an updated input pattern of the lithography process according to the set of the corrected boundaries.
The invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred but non-limiting embodiments. The following description is made with reference to the accompanying drawings.
An embodiment is disclosed below for elaborating the invention. However, the embodiment is for exemplification purpose only, not for limiting the scope of protection of the invention. Also, secondary elements are omitted in the embodiment for highlighting the technical features of the invention.
Please refer to
Further, the proximity effect is resulted from an accumulative energy or a scattering of particles in a resist layer, and the proximity effect results in the difference between a target pattern and an actual pattern.
Firstly, in step S101, a control pattern 110 is provided. The control pattern 110 is consisted of a set of control boundaries 111. As shown in
Next, in step S102, a dissection process is provided. The dissection process produces a set of points according to an import pattern which is composed of a set of boundaries, and the set of the boundaries pass through the set of the points.
Afterwards, in step S103, a set of control points 112 is provided. The control points 112 are produced according to the dissection process and the control pattern 110. As shown in
Then, in step S104, the control pattern 110 is defined as being an input pattern of the lithography process.
Next, in step S105, a target pattern 120 is provided. As shown in
In addition, the set of the target boundaries 121 represent a target energy distribution or a set of target resist contours.
Afterwards, in step S106, a set of target points 122 are produced according to the dissection process and the target pattern 120. The set of the target boundaries 121 pass through the set of the target points 122.
Next, in step 107, a set of target measurement values are provided. The set of the target measurement values are obtained from the set of the target points 122 and the set of the target boundaries 121.
Next, in step 108, an actual pattern 130 is defined. The actual pattern 130 is consisted of a set of actual boundaries 131.
In addition, the actual pattern 130 is obtained by processing a lithography process from the input pattern, i.e. the control pattern 110.
Furthermore, the actual pattern 130 can be also obtained via a numerical simulating process from the input pattern, i.e. the control pattern 110. The numerical simulating process includes a numerical model, and the numerical model is used for predicting the actual boundaries 131 in the lithography process.
Moreover, the actual boundaries 131 represent a set of actual energy distributions or a set of actual resist contours.
Afterwards, in step S109, a set of actual measurement values are obtained from the set of the target points 122 and the set of the actual boundaries 131.
Next, in step S110, a set of comparison values are calculated according to the set of the target measurement values and the set of the actual measurement values.
Afterwards, in step S111, an adjusting strategy is provided.
Then, in step S112, a corrected pattern 140 is produced according to the set of the comparison values and the adjusting strategy. As shown in
Afterwards, in step S113, the corrected pattern 140 is defined as an updated input pattern of the lithography process according to the set of the corrected boundaries 141.
In the present method, a target value range or a maximum recursive number is defined. If the comparison values do not reach the target value range, then the adjusting strategy is performed. Then, whether the comparison values reach the target value range or not is determined again until the comparison values reach the target value range or the recursive number reaches the maximum recursive number.
The present embodiment is used to adjust the proximity effect of the particle beam lithography process by several recursive steps, such that the precision of the particle beam lithography process can be improved greatly. It is an extreme progress for the semiconductor lithography process.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of a preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements and procedures, and the scope of the appended claims therefore should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements and procedures.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100123715 A | Jul 2011 | TW | national |
This application claims the benefits of a provisional application Ser. No. 61/446,077, filed Feb. 24, 2011, and Taiwan application Serial No. 100123715, filed Jul. 5, 2011, the subject matters of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3943281 | Keller et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4099062 | Kitcher | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4264711 | Greeneich | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4426564 | Steigerwald et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4426584 | Bohlen et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4498010 | Biechler et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4504558 | Bohlen et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4520269 | Jones | May 1985 | A |
| 4644170 | Komatsu | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4801843 | Mensies | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4823046 | Sluyterman | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4943729 | Ando et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5051598 | Ashton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5086398 | Moriizumi | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5182718 | Harafuji et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5241185 | Meiri et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5250812 | Murai et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5251140 | Chung et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5334282 | Nakayama et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5424173 | Wakabayashi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5432714 | Chung et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5553273 | Liebmann | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5682323 | Pasch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5723233 | Garza et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5827623 | Ishida et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5841145 | Satoh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5933212 | Kasuga | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6057066 | Hanawa | May 2000 | A |
| 6064485 | Lin et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071658 | Wu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6087046 | Nakasuji | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6146103 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6174801 | Tzu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6194104 | Hsu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218089 | Pierrat | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221260 | Chahine et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6281513 | Takenaka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6316164 | Parker et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6355383 | Yamashita | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6539521 | Pierrat et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6541784 | Kawano et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6597001 | Yamashita et al | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6720565 | Innes et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6821479 | Smith et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6828573 | Kawano et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6835937 | Muraki et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6872507 | Tzu et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6972417 | Suganuma et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7065735 | Ki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7112417 | Vyakarnam et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7120285 | Spence | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7241542 | Hudek et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7260812 | Melvin, III et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7462848 | Parker | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7525110 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7598005 | Yamamoto | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7635851 | Fujita et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7786454 | Parker | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 20070028206 | Chou et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Mihir Parikh, “Self-consistent proximity effect correction technique for resist Exposure (SPECTRE)”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 931-933, May/Jun. 1978. |
| K. D. Cummings et al., “Using a neural network to proximity correct patterns written with a Cambridge electron beam microfabricator 1 0.5 lithography system”, Appl. Phys., Lett. vol. 57, No. 14, pp. 1431-1433, Oct. 1, 1990. |
| Y. C. Pati et al., “An error measure for dose correction in e-beam nanolithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 1882-1888, Nov./Dec. 1990. |
| M. Hintermaler et al., “Proximity correction using computer aided proximity correction (CAPROX):Evaluation and application”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 3044-3047, Nov./Dec. 1991. |
| Kenji Harafuji et al., “Proximity effect correction data processing system for electron beam lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 133-142, Jan./Feb. 1992. |
| Chih-Yuan Chang et al., “A computational method for the correction of proximity effect in electron-beam lithography”, SPIE, vol. 1671, pp. 208-214, Mar. 8, 1992. |
| Hans Eisenmann et al., “PROXECCO—Proximity effect correction by convolution”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 2741-2745, Nov./Dec. 1993. |
| Wu, Mei-Jen, “The Study on the Determination of Proximity Parameters and Proximity Effect Correction in Electron Beam Lithography”, pp. 1-78, 1997. |
| Brian D. Cook et al., “Dose, shape, and hybrid modifications for PYRAMID in electron beam proximity effect correction”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 2303-2308, Nov./Dec. 1997. |
| Brian D. Cook et al., “PYRAMID—A Hierarchical, Rule-Based Approach Toward Proximity Effect Correction—Part II: Correction”, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 117-128, Feb. 1998. |
| Teruaki Okino et al., “Investigation of proximity effect correction in electron projection lithography (EPL)”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3997, pp. 235-244, Feb. 28, 2000. |
| Soo-Young Lee et al., “Automatic determination of spatial dose distribution for improved accuracy in e-beam proximity effect correction”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 57-58, pp. 303-309, Sep. 2001. |
| Soon Ho Kim et al., “Mask process proximity correction for next-generation mask fabrication”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B , vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 3041-3045, Nov./Dec. 2003. |
| S.-Y. Lee et al., “Simultaneous dose modification for balanced E-beam proximity correction minimizing CD error”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 69, pp. 47-56, Aug. 2003. |
| Jan-Tsai Liu, “E-Beam Proximity Effect Correction and Its Application to the Fabrication of SOI FinFET”,Degree Program of Electrical Engineering Computer Science, National Chiao Tung University, pp. 1-72, 2003. |
| Noppachai Anupongpaibool et al., “Distributed Correction of Proximity Effect in Electron Beam Lithography on a Heterogeneous Cluster”, Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'04), Apr. 2004. |
| Sheng-Jung Hung, “Electron-beam Lithography Proximity Effect Correction and Fabrication of Anti-reflection Coating with BA-m Benzoxazine film”, Institute of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Central University, pp. 1-108, Jul. 17, 2006. |
| S. Manakli et al., “New Electron Beam Proximity Effects Correction Approach for 45 and 32nm Nodes”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 45, No. 8A, pp. 6462-6467, Aug. 4, 2006. |
| Serdar Manakli et al., “Complementary dose and geometrical solutions for electron beam direct write lithography proximity effects correction: application for sub-45-nm node product manufacturing”, J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 033001-1-033001-7, Jul.-Sep. 2007. |
| Soo-Young Lee, “Pyramid:A Hierarchical Approach to E-beam Proximity Effect Correction”, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, pp. 1-42, Feb. 1998. |
| Pei-Lin Tien, “Design of Model-based Identification and Correction Algorithms for Electron Proximity Effects”, Graduate Institute of Electrical Engineering College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Taiwan University, pp. 1-42, Jul. 2007. |
| Yi-Sheng Su et al., “Design of Automatic Controllers for Model-based OPC with Optimal Resist Threshold Determination for Improving Correction Convergence”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6924, pp. 69243Z-1-69243Z-9, Feb. 2008. |
| Chun-Hung Liu et al., “Model-Based Proximity Effect Correction for Electron-Beam-Direct- Write Lithography”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7637, pp. 76371V-1-76371V-8, Feb. 23, 2010. |
| Geraint Owen and Paul Rissman, “Proximity effect correction for electron beam lithography by equalization of background dose”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 3573-3581, Jun. 1983. |
| Chris Cork et al., “Optical proximity correction challenges with highly elliptical contacts.” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7823, pp. 78233R-1-78233R-11, Sep. 13, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120221983 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61446077 | Feb 2011 | US |
