Method for controlling the oxidation of implanted silicon

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6555484
  • Patent Number
    6,555,484
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 19, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 29, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Two different regions of a semiconductor substrate are implanted with dopants/ions. The implantation may occur though a sacrificial oxide layer disposed over the substrate. Following implantation in one or both regions, the substrate may be annealed and the sacrificial oxide layer removed. An oxide layer is then grown over the implanted regions of the substrate. For some embodiments, the substrate may be implanted with arsenic and/or with phosphorus. Further, the anneal may be performed for approximately 30 to 120 minutes at a temperature between approximately 900° C. and 950° C.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the growth of oxides on semiconductors and, in particular, relates to the differential growth of oxide layers over implanted areas of a silicon based substrate.




BACKGROUND




In the manufacture of semiconductor devices, thin layers of gate oxide are grown over active areas. It has long been known that slow oxide growth rates should be used to reproducibly grow quality thin oxide films of proper thicknesses over semiconductor dies. However, with the advent of new technologies there has been a need grow gate oxide layers of different thicknesses on different sections of a given semiconductor die. For example, in the manufacture of programmable devices some areas of a semiconductor die on a wafer may require gate oxide thicknesses of between 70 Å and 80 Å. In other areas on the same semiconductor die, however, gate oxide thicknesses of 150 Å to 180 Å may be required. Historically, it has been difficult to control the proper oxide thicknesses within the separate regions of a given semiconductor die or wafer using conventional oxide growth methods.




In other applications, again in the manufacture of programmable devices, thin oxide layers are to be grown over areas of silicon that have been heavily doped. Oxidation rates for such areas are typically very much higher than for areas of undoped silicon. For example, areas of silicon that have been doped with phosphorus will exhibit an affinity for oxygen and so such areas of a semiconductor die will tend to oxidize much more quickly than undoped areas. Indeed, oxide growth rates over heavily doped areas of a semiconductor die have been observed that are five times faster than growth rates in undoped areas of the same semiconductor die.




Because of the need to precisely control the thickness of the gate oxide layer, there is a need to be able to control the oxidation rate over areas of heavily doped silicon. Ideally, one would like to keep the oxidation rate over such heavily doped areas approximately the same as the oxidation rate over undoped areas. This would provide for a very controlled oxide growth step during processing of the semiconductor die. At the very least, the oxidation rate for the heavily doped areas of silicon should be predictable and controllable.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides, in one embodiment, a method of controlling the oxidation rate in a semiconductor die. Two different regions of the semiconductor die are implanted with different amounts of dopants/ions. The implantation may occur though a sacrificial oxide layer disposed over the semiconductor die. Following implantation in one or both regions, the semiconductor die may be annealed and the sacrificial oxide layer may be removed. An oxide layer may then be grown over the implanted region(s) of the semiconductor die.




For some embodiments, the semiconductor die may be implanted with arsenic and/or with phosphorus. Further, the anneal may be performed for approximately 30 to 120 minutes at a temperature between approximately 900° C. and 950° C.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawing in which:




FIGS.


1


(


a


)-


1


(


d


) illustrate structures formed after various steps in the processing of a semiconductor in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Described herein is a method of controlling the oxidation rate in a semiconductor die. A region of the semiconductor die may be implanted with dopants/ions through a sacrificial oxide layer disposed over the die. Following the implantation, the semiconductor die may be annealed, for example at a temperature of between approximately 900° C. and 950° C. for approximately 30 to 120 minutes. Following the anneal, the sacrificial oxide layer may be stripped and a gate oxide layer grown over the area of the implantation. Although described with reference to certain specific illustrated embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is applicable to a wide variety of silicon processing applications. Accordingly, the embodiments discussed below should be regarded as illustrative only.




In certain technologies, for example in the manufacture of electrically erasable programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), a heavily doped N layer (often referred to as the buried N+ layer) is used under the tunnel oxide layer for programming. The high level of doping (e.g., on the order of 10


19


ions/cm


3


) in such areas usually leads to a significantly enhanced oxidation rate over this area of the semiconductor die, especially when the oxidation is performed in a steam environment. The present invention provides a method of controlling the enhancement of this oxidation rate.




In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the oxidation rate for areas of heavily implanted silicon can be reduced significantly by annealing the implanted wafer, with a sacrificial oxide layer present, at temperatures in the range of approximately 900° C. to 950° C. for approximately 30 to 120 minutes, preferably 30 to 60 minutes. Depending on the time and temperature, the oxidation enhancement decreases from approximately two times that of the oxidation rate which would be observed without such an anneal to approximately 1.15 times, for an arsenic doping of 4×10


14


cm


−2


at 70 KeV. If the sacrificial oxide layer is removed prior to the oxide growth, the oxidation rate enhancement increases, especially if an anneal is performed prior to the oxidation in the fabrication process. Rate enhancement can be as high as 2.8 times that of conventional oxide growth rates with an anneal prior to oxidation. Thus, according to one embodiment of the present invention the oxidation rate enhancement on implanted silicon can be controlled anywhere between 1.15 and 2.8 times that of an oxide growth rate on bare silicon.




As illustrated in FIGS.


1


(


a


)-


1


(


d


), the present invention uses a number of processing steps to achieve control of the enhancement in oxidation rate. First, as shown in FIG.


1


(


a


), for a semiconductor die


5


which includes a semiconductor substrate


10


(which may comprise silicon) and a pad oxide layer


12


disposed over the substrate


10


, a nitride layer


14


may be deposited prior to the formation of isolation structures in the semiconductor die


5


. The substrate


10


may be any conventional silicon-based semiconductor, such as silicon, N- or P-doped silicon, silicon-germanium, a silicon-based semiconductor-on-insulator structure, etc., but is preferably silicon or silicon doped with up to 10


15


atoms/cm


3


of phosphorous or arsenic. The isolation structures


16


may comprise a field oxide layer which is fabricated in accordance with conventional local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS) isolation techniques. Once the isolation structures have been formed, a sacrificial oxide layer


18


may be grown over the isolation structures and the substrate


10


as shown in FIG.


1


(


b


).




Following growth of the sacrificial oxide layer


18


, the substrate


10


may be implanted with one or more dopants


20


during an implanting step (e.g., a buried N+ implant) as shown in FIG.


1


(


c


). Suitable dopants include arsenic (As), phosphorus (P), boron (B), antimony (Sb), gallium (Ga) and indium (In), As and/or P being preferred. Suitable doping levels may be from 10


12


to 5×10


15


cm


−2


, preferably from 10


13


to 5×10


15


cm


−2


, at an energy of from 30 to 100 KeV, preferably 40 to 80 KeV. Following the implant, the semiconductor die may be annealed (e.g., at a temperature of between 700 to 1100° C., preferably 800 to 1000° C. and more preferably 850 to 970° C.), for a period of time sufficient to diffuse the dopant a desired and/or predetermined depth into the substrate. The sacrificial oxide layer


18


may then be stripped and a gate oxide layer


22


may then be grown in the active region (e.g., simultaneously over different regions within the semiconductors the different regions having different implants) as shown in FIG.


1


(


d


).




Table 1 below provides the results of various processes performed according to the present invention for a gate oxide thickness of 150 Å. As shown, implants of both arsenic (As) and phosphorus (P) were performed at various dose levels and energies. Anneals were performed at temperatures of 900° C. and 950° C. to provide comparison with oxidation which was performed without anneal. The results of the differential oxidation rates as compared to the oxidation rate when performed without anneal are presented.

















TABLE 1









Implant




Dose




Energy




Anneal





Differential






Species




(cm


−2


)




(KeV)




(° C.)




Oxidation




oxidation











As




5E + 13




70




No




Wet




1.1







5E + 13




70




900




Wet




1.0







5E + 13




70




950




Wet




1.0






As




1E + 14




50




No




Wet




1.2







1E + 14




50




900




Wet




1.0







1E + 14




50




950




Wet




1.0






P




5E + 13




50




No




Wet




1.7







5E + 13




50




900




Wet




1.2







5E + 13




50




950




Wet




1.1






As




4E + 14




70




No




Dry




1.4







4E + 14




70




900




Dry




1.1







4E + 14




70




950




Dry




1.0






As




4E + 14




50




No




Dry




1.5







4E + 14




50




900




Dry




1.1







4E + 14




50




950




Dry




1.0














This table shows that an anneal performed after the implant, with the sacrificial oxide intact, decreases the oxidation rate enhancement significantly.




In an alternative embodiment of the present invention for increasing the oxidation enhancement, the annealing step may be omitted. A semiconductor substrate comprising silicon and having a pad oxide layer disposed thereover is patterned with a nitride layer. Conventional LOCOS isolation structures are formed and, thereafter, a sacrificial oxide layer is grown. Ion implantation is then performed, for example using arsenic or phosphorus ions. Following implantation, the sacrificial oxide layer is stripped and the gate oxide layer is grown in the active region.




An experiment was carried out to determine the differential oxide growth rates for buried N+ implants using different dose/energy combinations. To determine the effect of an anneal prior to gate oxidation, different anneal times at 950° C. were used and compared to oxide thicknesses and growth rates without an anneal step. Wet oxidation (i.e., a water-containing [steam] environment that may be generated in situ from hydrogen and oxygen gases) was used to provide a high quality oxide. Table 2 summarizes the thicknesses for the different cases and the relative ratios to identically processed, non-implanted die.
















TABLE 2









Wafer #




As implant




P implant




Thickness




Ratio























(a) With 120 min. anneal @ 950° C. before oxidation.















TW














94.1











3














91.6











4














90.0











7




4E14 50 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




248




2.75






10




4E14 70 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




218




2.42






13




4E14 90 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




188




2.09






16




1E14 50 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




127




1.41






19




1E14 70 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




120




1.33






22




1E14 90 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




113




1.25











(b) With 30 min. anneal @ 950° C. before oxidation.















TW














92.3











2














88.1











6




4E14 50 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




243




2.76






9




4E14 70 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




202




2.29






12




4E14 90 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




168




1.90






15




4E14 50 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




123




1.39






18




1E14 70 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




114




1.29






21




1E14 90 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




110




1.25











(c) With no anneal before oxidation.















TW














74.6











1














73.8











5




4E14 50 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




163




2.21






8




4E14 70 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




127




1.72






11




4E14 90 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




107




1.45






14




4E14 50 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




102




1.38






17




1E14 70 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




95.8




1.29






20




1E14 90 Kev




5E13 50 Kev




93.9




1.27














Table 2 shows that the higher the arsenic dose level, the higher the differential oxidation ratio. For the same dose level, the higher the energy, the lower the differential oxidation ratio. However, when an anneal was performed prior to oxidation, a higher differential oxidation ratio was observed than was present when no anneal was used. It was further observed that the anneal time did not affect the differential oxidation ratio significantly.




From the above, one of ordinary skill in the art can readily determine, without undue experimentation, the implant conditions (e.g., dopant dosage and/or implant energy), the desirability of an annealing step (which may be performed before or after the removal of the sacrificial oxide to effect differential oxide growth), the annealing temperature, etc. to achieve a desired differential growth.




Thus, a method for controlling the enhanced oxidation of heavily implanted silicon has been described. Although discussed with reference to certain specific illustrated embodiments, it should be recognized that the present invention may find application in a wide variety of silicon processing methodologies. Accordingly, the present invention should only be measured in terms of the claims which follow.



Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising:implanting with from 5×1013 to 1019 atoms/cm3 of a first dopant of a first conductivity into a first active region of a semiconductor die; implanting with from 5×1013 to 1019 atoms/cm3 of a second different dopant of said first conductivity into a second, separate active region of said semiconductor die; annealing said semiconductor die sufficiently to reduce a difference in oxidation rates of said first and second active regions; and simultaneously growing a gate oxide layer over said first and second active regions of said semiconductor die, to different thicknesses.
  • 2. A method as in claim 1 wherein said first and second dopants are selected from the group consisting of arsenic, phosphorous, boron, antimony, gallium and indium.
  • 3. A method as in claim 2 wherein said first dopant comprises Phosphorous ions implanted at a first energy level.
  • 4. A method as in claim 3 wherein said first dopant further comprises Arsenic ions implanted at a second energy level.
  • 5. A method as in claim 1 wherein said step of annealing is performed at a temperature between approximately 700° C. and approximately 1100° C.
  • 6. A method as in claim 5 wherein said step of annealing is performed for a period of approximately 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
  • 7. A method as in claim 1 wherein said step of annealing is performed at a temperature between approximately 900° C. and approximately 950° C.
  • 8. A method as in claim 1 wherein said step of implanting said first dopant is performed under a first set of conditions comprising at least one member from the group consisting of dopant dosage and implant energy and said step of implanting said second dopant is performed under a second set of conditions comprising at least one member selected from the group of consisting of dopant dosage and implant energy, wherein at least one of said first set of conditions differs from a corresponding one of said second set of conditions.
  • 9. A method as in claim 8 wherein said first and second set of conditions comprise (a) dosage of dopant and (b) implant energy.
  • 10. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of annealing said substrate between said implanting steps.
  • 11. A method as in claim 1 wherein said first and second dopants are implanted through a sacrificial oxide layer disposed over said substrate.
  • 12. A method as in claim 11 further comprising the step of removing said sacrificial oxide layer before said step of growing said oxide layer.
  • 13. A method as in claim 11 wherein said step of removing said sacrificial oxide layer is performed after said step of annealing.
  • 14. A method as in claim 13 wherein said oxide layer is grown in an environment comprising hydrogen and oxygen.
  • 15. A method, comprising:implanting a first active region of a semiconductor die with from 5×1013 to 1019 atoms/cm3 of a first dopant of a first conductivity type; followed by implanting a second separate active region of said semiconductor die with from 5×1013 to 1019 atoms/cm3 of a second different dopant of said first conductivity type; followed by annealing said semiconductor die at a temperature of at least 700° C.; followed by growing a gate oxide layer over said first active region and said second active region, to different thicknesses, at the same time.
  • 16. A method, comprising:implanting with from 5×1013 to 1019 atoms/cm3 of a first dopant of a first conductivity type through a sacrificial oxide layer into a first active region of a semiconductor die; implanting with from 5×1013 to 1019 atoms/cm3 of a second different dopant of said first conductivity type through said sacrificial oxide layer into a second, separate active region of said semiconductor die; annealing said semiconductor die sufficiently to reduce a difference in oxidation rates of said first and second active regions; removing said sacrificial oxide layer from over at least one of said first and second active regions; and simultaneously growing a gate oxide layer over said first and second active regions of said semiconductor die, to different thicknesses.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein said annealing is conducted for a length of time of from 30 to 120 minutes.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein said annealing is conducted at a temperature of from 700 to 1100° C.
US Referenced Citations (27)
Number Name Date Kind
3430109 Chou Feb 1969 A
3585714 Chou Jun 1971 A
4256514 Pogge Mar 1981 A
4639288 Price et al. Jan 1987 A
4851361 Schumann et al. Jul 1989 A
4916513 Li Apr 1990 A
4946800 Li Aug 1990 A
4965221 Dennison et al. Oct 1990 A
4992390 Chang Feb 1991 A
5151381 Liu et al. Sep 1992 A
5296094 Shan et al. Mar 1994 A
5334861 Pfiester et al. Aug 1994 A
5393679 Yang Feb 1995 A
5431778 Dahm et al. Jul 1995 A
5443998 Meyer Aug 1995 A
5447884 Fahey et al. Sep 1995 A
5498577 Fulford, Jr. et al. Mar 1996 A
5672521 Barsan et al. Sep 1997 A
5679483 Maurer Oct 1997 A
5688701 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1997 A
5702988 Liang Dec 1997 A
5739056 Dennison et al. Apr 1998 A
5750428 Chang May 1998 A
5792680 Sung et al. Aug 1998 A
5795803 Takamura et al. Aug 1998 A
5869385 Tang et al. Feb 1999 A
5900658 Lee et al. May 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
53-65086 Oct 1978 JP
54124986 Sep 1979 JP
60-116146 Jun 1985 JP
61-135136 Jun 1986 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
US 5,679,486, 10/1997, Maurer (withdrawn)*
Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Wolf Stanley, vol. 1, pp. 280-282, 1986.*
Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Wolf Stanley, vol. 2, pp. 331-332, 1990.*
Silico Processing for the VLSI Era, Wolf Stanley, vol. 1, pp. 280-282, 1986.*
Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Wolf Stanley, vol. 1, pp. 219-220, 1986.*
Wolf “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era” pp. 331-332, vol. 2, 1990.*
Wolf“silicon processing for the VLSI Era” pp. 280-282, vol. 1, 1986.*
Stanley Wolf Ph.D, “Silicon Processing For the VLSI ERA”, Process Technology, vol. 1, pp. 528-534, (1986).