Method for forming an actuator array device

Abstract
A method of manufacturing a microactuator device includes a plurality of generally parallel thin flexible sheets bonded together in a predetermined pattern to form an array of unit cells. Preferably, each of the sheets has only a single electrode layer located on one side of the sheet. Pairs of such sheets are then bonded together at spaced bonding locations with the electrode layers facing one another. Several sets of such sheet pairs can then be bonded together to form a microactuator device.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to microactuators having macroscopic force and displacement. More particularly, the invention relates to microactuators comprising a 3-D array of small actuator cells, which are formed from stacked substrate sheets having an electrode layer on only one side of the substrate sheet.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Most microactuator arrays, used as MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical-Systems) devices, are fabricated in silicon. Despite the many favorable attributes of silicon, it is not always a suitable or ideal material for every application of MEMS. Silicon is brittle and subject to breaking, particularly as the total device size increases. This brittleness limits devices, especially actuators, to relatively small sizes capable of only small displacements and forces. The shapes that can be realized in silicon are typically restricted by crystalline planes or 2-D fabrication processes, and more complicated structures often result in prohibitively high cost and low yield. It would be of great advantage to the art if another material, other than silicon, could be used for MEMS and actuators. In particular, it would be advantageous if the structure used to fabricate the actuator required significantly fewer electrode layers with no substantial loss in force, while requiring less power to operate.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides an electrostatic microactuator array device including a plurality of sheet pairs secured together over the sheet pair lengths and widths. The sheet pairs can be formed of a first sheet and a second sheet, wherein the first and second sheets have a front and back surface. The first and second sheets preferably have a substrate layer disposed toward the sheet back surface, a dielectric layer disposed toward the sheet front surface, and a conductive layer disposed between the substrate layer and the dielectric layer. Voltage applied to the conductive layers causes an attractive electrostatic force between the first and second sheets. The first and second sheet front surfaces are secured together at a number of spaced bonding locations along the sheet lengths and widths, such that the first and second sheets have a plurality of non-bonded regions between the bonding locations. In this configuration, the sheet pairs have outer surfaces formed of the back surfaces of the first and second sheets. The outer surfaces of the adjacent sheet pairs are secured together over the sheet pair lengths and widths to form an array of sheet pairs.




In one illustrative embodiment, the sheet pairs are bonded together along continuous bonded locations extending across the sheets. These bonded locations may be disposed along substantially straight lines or curved lines, as desired. Alternatively, the bonded locations may be a discontinuous series of spots or lines extending over the sheet surface.




The first and second sheets may lie substantially flat between the bonding regions, relying on an applied tension to the microactuator to separate the sheets. Alternatively, the sheet pairs may be pre-shaped to form cavities between the bonded regions, even with no applied tension to the microactuator. This latter configuration may be accomplished in any number of ways. For example, the first sheet may be curved, and the second sheet may be substantially flat. In this configuration, the first sheet undulates away from the second flat sheet between the bonded locations. In another example, both the first and second sheets may curve away from each other in the non-bonded regions, coming back together at the bonded locations. The curved or corrugated sheets may thus form cavities between the bonding regions even with no applied tension to the microactuator. In any event, it is contemplated that the sheet pairs may collectively be aligned substantially along a plane, or may conform to a curved surface.




The sheets included in the present invention require only a single electrode layer bonded or applied to a substrate layer. The electrode layer is preferably formed of a conductor material deposited over the substrate layer, and a dielectric material deposited over the conductor. The substrate layer may be a polymer, ceramic, silicon, steel, or any other material that provides the desired characteristics for a particular application. The first and second sheets of each pair can be bonded together so that the front surfaces of the sheets are in close proximity to one another near the bonded regions. The close proximity of the sheets helps overcome the initial separation of the non-bonded regions of the sheets, and zip together inward from the bonding locations toward the center of the non-bonded regions. The attraction of the sheets for each other upon the application of an electrical potential provides the force for the microactuator.




In one method of manufacture, the sheet pairs are formed by first bonding together the sheets at periodic intervals, for example, along regularly spaced parallel lines. This can be done using manufacturing techniques such as heat bonding or adhesive application. With the sheet pairs formed, the sheet pairs can be bonded together many at a time, to form the microactuator array. The process of bonding together the multiple, already formed sheet pairs can be less precise with little or no loss in device performance than the process used to bond the sheets of a sheet pair. Since no voltage is applied between the sheet pairs, the distance between the sheet pairs may not be as critical as the distance between the sheets forming each pair.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a partial cut-away perspective view of a microactuator using polymer sheets;





FIG. 2

is a schematic, partially cut-away and in section view of a microactuator formed of a plurality of unit cells with a center polymer sheet;





FIG. 3

is a schematic, partially cut-away and in section view of a microactuator formed of a plurality of unit cells with no center polymer sheet;





FIG. 4

is a fragmentary, schematic, cross-sectional view of unit cells of

FIG. 2

formed of two polymer sheet pairs having only a single surface electrode layer on each sheet with one sheet pre-curved or allowed to bend and the other remaining substantially flat;





FIG. 5

is a fragmentary, schematic, cross-sectional view of unit cells of

FIG. 3

formed of two polymer sheet pairs having only a single surface electrode layer with both sheets either pre-curved or allowed to bend;





FIG. 6

is a fragmentary, schematic, cross-sectional view of part of the unit cell of

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 7

is a fragmentary, schematic, cross-sectional view of part of the unit cell of

FIG. 5

;





FIG. 8

is a fragmentary, schematic, cross-sectional view of part of the unit cell of

FIG. 5

with a trenched bond;





FIG. 9

is a diagram showing the model parameters for single-sided electrodes; and





FIG. 10

is a diagram showing the model parameters for double-sided electrodes.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIG. 1

is a partial cut-away perspective view of a microactuator using polymer sheets. The illustrative microactuator is formed by stacking and bonding together multiple polymer sheets, as described in for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/233,368 to Cabuz et al., filed Dec. 29, 1998, entitled “POLYMER MICROACTUATOR ARRAY WITH MACROSCOPIC FORCE AND DISPLACEMENT”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,608; and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/476,667 to Horning, filed Dec. 30, 1999, entitled “MICROACTUATOR ARRAY WITH INTEGRALLY FORMED PACKAGE”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,013, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.




As described in the above references, electrodes from selected sheets can be electrically tied together or can be individually addressed, depending on the degree of control and sophistication of the end use, noting that individual addressing requires more connections, so it would involve higher cost but finer control when needed. Electrical contact between layers and sheets can be made through flexible plastic interconnect straps, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/233,368 to Cabuz et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,608, or through an integrally formed package, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/476,667 to Horning, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,013.




In either case, the top of the microactuator stack may be secured to an upper housing


42


, and the bottom of the microactuator stack is secured to a lower housing


48


. The upper and/or lower housings


42


and


48


may include an external connector


50


and control circuitry


52


for controlling the microactuator. The upper and/or lower housing


42


and


48


may further include one or more levels of metal interconnects, as in a printed circuit board, to route the inputs of the external connector


50


through the control circuitry


52


and to the sheets of the actuator using one or more of the flexible interconnect straps.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a microactuator


70


is illustrated extending from an upper housing


72


to a lower housing


74


. The terms “upper” and “lower” are used herein for purposes of illustration only, as the microactuators in the general case may be used in any position. Upper housing


72


includes an upper connector


73


and lower housing


74


includes a lower connector


75


, which can both be used for connecting the microactuator to other members to which force is to be applied. In one embodiment, upper housing


72


has an upper connect layer


76


and lower housing


74


has a lower connect layer


78


, both of which can be used to electrically connect the electrostatically moveable unit cells and polymeric sheets discussed further below.




The embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 2

includes alternating layers of polymeric sheets which can be viewed as forming repeating unit cells


86


that form the moveable elements of the microactuator. Microactuator


70


includes a first curved or bent upper polymer sheet


80


, a substantially flat lower polymeric sheet


82


, and a second curved or bent upper polymeric sheet


84


, etc. In this embodiment, the curved sheets may be similar or identical, and each curved sheet may be more properly viewed as grouped together with the flat sheet beneath each curved sheet to form a sheet pair. The pairs may then be viewed as being secured together to form the microactuator. The polymeric sheets repeat in numerous layers, with only the upper most layers illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the remainder being indicated only by repetition marks


88


. In a preferred embodiment, the upper and lower sheets have a substantial depth, giving rise to a three-dimensional structure.




First upper sheets


80


, first lower flat sheets


82


, and second upper sheets


84


are electrically connected to the upper housing


72


through electrical connection lines


90


. Electrical connection lines


90


are shown in a highly diagrammatic form, and can be used to interconnect the upper and lower sheets in various combinations, as illustrated by straps


40


and


44


in

FIG. 1. A

protective film or envelope


91


encloses the microactuator in some embodiments, protecting the polymeric sheets from the environment. In use, microactuator


70


operates by the attraction of upper polymeric sheet


80


to lower sheet


82


, and by the attraction of second curved upper polymeric sheet


84


to the flat polymeric sheet beneath it. The electrostatic attractive forces between the sheets pull the sheets closer together, acting to pull upper housing


72


toward lower housing


74


.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, another embodiment of the invention is illustrated in a microactuator


92


also having upper housing


72


, lower housing


74


, electrical interconnect lines


90


, and protective outer film


91


. Microactuator


92


, unlike microactuator


70


, has no flat polymeric sheet. Microactuator


92


includes a series of curved or bent upper polymeric sheets


96


and curved or bent lower polymeric sheets


98


. Microactuator


92


may be viewed as being formed of numerous repeating unit cells


94


bonded together. In particular, the polymeric sheets may be viewed as being secured together in pairs, with the assembled pairs then secured together to form the microactuator. In the embodiment illustrated, the upper and lower polymeric sheets


96


and


98


are directly secured to each other using a bonding process, which can include adhesives or other methods for securing polymers to polymers, as further described below. In use, microactuator


92


operates by the attraction of upper polymeric sheet


96


to lower polymeric sheet


98


. The electrostatic attractive forces between the sheets pull the sheets closer together, acting to pull upper housing


72


toward lower housing


74


.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, a unit cell such as unit cell


86


of

FIG. 2

is illustrated in greater detail. First curved upper sheet


80


and first flat lower sheet


82


are also formed of an electrode layer such as electrode layer


105


adhered to polymeric layer


104


, with electrode layer


105


having conductive layer


103


and dielectric layer


102


. A second lower flat sheet


89


is shown beneath the second upper curved sheet


84


. First upper curved sheet


80


and first lower flat sheet


82


may be considered as a sheet pair


83


. Likewise, second upper curved sheet


84


and second flat lower sheet


89


may be considered another sheet pair


85


. Thus, the microactuator portion illustrated in

FIG. 4

may be considered to be formed of two sheet pairs


83


and


85


. The opposing electrode layers of each opposing sheet in the pair may be seen to form cavities


87


which contract, thereby causing displacement of the actuator.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, a unit cell such as unit cell


94


of

FIG. 3

is illustrated in greater detail. Upper polymeric sheets


96


and lower sheets


98


include a polymeric layer


112


adjacent to and coupled to an electrode layer


115


which, in this embodiment, is formed of a conductive layer


111


and a dielectric layer


114


. Each upper sheet


96


and lower sheet


98


may be viewed as being secured together to form a sheet pair, such as sheet pairs


93


and


95


illustrated in FIG.


5


. Numerous sheet pairs may be secured together to form the microactuator. Cavities


97


are formed between the curves or corrugations of the upper and lower sheets of each sheet pair. Cavities


97


contract with the application of electrical potential, causing displacement of the actuator.




Referring now to

FIG. 6

, part of a unit cell having a flat polymeric sheet such as unit cell


86


of

FIGS. 2 and 4

is illustrated. The unit cell includes first flat lower sheet


82


at top and second lower flat sheet


89


at bottom, with the second curved upper sheet


84


extending therebetween. In the illustrative embodiment, second curved upper sheet


84


is adhered to first upper flat sheet


82


with upper adhesive


116


, and is further adhered to the second upper flat sheet


89


with lower adhesive


118


. Other methods for securing the second curved upper sheet


84


to first upper flat sheet


82


and/or to the second upper flat sheet


89


may include thermal sealing, ultrasonic welding, etc., particularly when the sheets are formed from materials that can be directly bonded together.




Second upper curved sheet


84


and second lower flat sheet


89


may be considered as forming a sheet pair having cavity


87


therebetween. The contraction of cavity


87


may be seen to provide the actuator displacement. In this view, first lower flat sheet


82


may be seen to form the lower part of another sheet pair. Numerous lower adhesives


118


may be viewed as periodically bonding the two sheets of the sheet pair together, forming a non-bonded region


87


therebetween. Upper adhesive


116


may be viewed as bonding two sheet pairs together.




Electric field lines


114


are illustrated in the region where conductive layers


103


of the curved upper sheet


84


and the flat sheet


89


come close together, creating as small of a gap as possible between the two dielectric layers


102


. As can be seen from inspection of

FIG. 6

, the thickness of lower adhesive


118


can establish the limit of the gap thickness between the two sheets. The tolerances and limit of the small gap between the sheets may be important in manufacturing the microactuators. The electrostatic attraction between the two closely spaced electrodes is dependent on the separation distance. As curved upper sheet


84


is pulled down toward flat sheet


89


, the gap between the two electrodes is decreased in the region more toward the center of the unit cell, which increases the attraction in the region more toward the center of the unit cell. The process of closing the gap from the outside in acts as a rolling or zipping action, acting to pull the previously spaced apart sheets together.




The individual sheets may be preformed using low cost processes, such as cutting or stamping rather than photolithography and etching. Aluminum or other metal or alloy electrodes and one or more dielectric films, such as aluminum oxide, polyimide, polyvinylidene flouride (PVdF), acrylates, or other suitable organic or inorganic dielectrics, may be applied to the sheets. The conductive portion forms the electrode, and the dielectric prevents shorting of the electrodes when they touch. These films can be patterned using standard patterning techniques, such as those used to make printed circuit boards or roll type printing processes. The dielectric layer should produce a chemically stable surface with a very low surface energy. This may be helpful in preventing stiction. The level of performance that can be obtained from an electrostatic actuator often depends in part on the dielectric strength of the material used as a dielectric.




Referring now to

FIG. 7

, part of a unit cell not having a center polymeric sheet, such as unit cell


94


of

FIGS. 3 and 5

, is illustrated. The unit cell includes curved upper sheet


96


and curved lower sheet


98


. Upper sheet


96


is shown adhered to the lower sheet


98


with adhesive


120


. Upper sheet


96


and lower sheet


98


may be viewed as forming a sheet pair, where such sheet pairs are secured together to form a microactuator. Adhesive


120


can be viewed as periodically bonding the sheet pair


96


and


98


together, forming a non-bonded region


97


therebetween. Electric field lines


114


are illustrated in the region where conductive layers


111


of upper polymeric sheet


96


and lower polymeric sheet


98


come closely together, creating a small gap between the two conductive layers.




As can be seen from inspection of

FIG. 7

, the thickness of adhesive


120


can cause a gap between the two sheets. As discussed with respect to

FIG. 6

, the tolerances and limit of such a gap may be important in manufacturing the microactuators, as the electrostatic attraction between the two closely spaced electrodes is dependent on the separation distance. To minimize the gap between the two sheets, a trench may be cut or etched into one or both of the sheets at the bonding locations.

FIG. 8

shows a bond where a first trench


130


is cut into the upper sheet


96


and a second trench


132


is cut into the lower sheet


98


. The first trench


130


and the second trench


132


are preferably in registration, as shown, and extend into the substrate of the sheet. In one embodiment, the first trench


130


may extend all the way through the upper sheet


96


, as shown by dotted line


133


. Likewise, the second trench


132


may extend all the way through the lower sheet


98


, as shown by dotted line


135


.




An adhesive


134


may be provided in the cavity formed by the first trench


130


and/or the second trench


132


. Once the adhesive is provided, the two sheets


96


and


98


may be pressed together to form the bond. The first trench


130


and the second trench


132


may have a length. The adhesive preferably does not extend the full length of the trenches. This may help prevent excess adhesive from flowing outside of the trenches and between the upper and lower sheets. In some embodiments, a catalyst may be provided to help cure the adhesive. That catalyst may be, for example, heat, UV radiation, pressure, etc. An advantage of this approach is that the trenches


130


and


132


provide a cavity for the adhesive


134


, thereby leaving little or no gap between the sheets. This may increase the performance of the microactuator, as further described herein. Another advantage of this approach is that the concentration of stress at the bond may be reduced.




The electrostatic field (and therefore the electrostatic energy) drops off extremely rapidly as the separation between the sheets increases. Simple estimates and finite element models show that the electrostatic field is negligible when the gap is a little over 1 μm, using typical values of 0.3 μm for the dielectric thickness and 3.0 for the dielectric constant. Therefore, the electrostatic energy can be simplified, with little loss in accuracy, by assuming it is zero everywhere that the gap is nonzero, and is constant where the gap is zero. The electrostatic energy at a fixed voltage is then simply that of a parallel plate capacitor, and can be expressed using the relation:










U
E

=

{




-



ε
o


ε






b


(

l
-
c

)




V
2



4





d






for





single





sided






(
ss
)






electrodes






-



ε
o


ε






b


(

2

a

)




V
2



4





d






for





double





sided






(
ds
)






electrodes









(

Equation





1

)













The term “single sided electrode” refers to a unit cell that has an electrode layer on only one side of the sheets. The term “double sided electrode” refers to a unit cell that has an electrode layer on both sides of the sheets.





FIG. 9

is a diagram showing the model parameters used for unit cells made from sheets with a single-sided electrode. In the design without flat center planes (e.g. FIG.


7


), the displacement δ is still defined as the distance between the two surfaces when the structure is extended.

FIG. 10

is a diagram showing the model parameters used for unit cells made from sheets with double-sided electrodes.




The bending energy is derived from the curvature of the sheet. Since the electrostatic force falls off so quickly, it has very little influence on the bending profile of the sheets, although it has a strong influence on the position of the point of contact between the two sheets and, therefore, the length of the bent region. Thus, the profile is that of a beam with a load W at the end. The bending energy can thus be expressed using the relation:










U
B

=




E





b






t
3


24







(




2


y




x
2



)

2




x




=

{





1
2


k







b


(

l
c

)


3



δ
2





for





ss





electrodes







1
2


k







b


(

l

l
-

2

a



)


3



δ
2





for





ds





electrodes










(

Equation





2

)













where E is Young's modulus and k is the “spring constant” of the structure.










k


W

b





δ



=

{





E






t
3



l
3





with





flat





centerplanes







E






t
3



2


l
3






without





flat





centerplanes









(

Equation





3

)













The total energy can be expressed using the relation:










U
Total

=



U
B

+

U
E


=

{






1
2


k







b


(

l
c

)


3



δ
2


-



ε
o


ε






b


(

l
-
c

)




V
2



4





d






for





ss





electrodes








1
2


k







b


(

l

l
-

2

a



)


3



δ
2


-



ε
o


ε






b


(

2

a

)




V
2



4





d






for





ds





electrodes










(

Equation





4

)













Equilibrium is achieved when ∂U


Total


/∂c=0 for single sided electrodes or ∂U


Total


/∂a=0 for double sided electrodes, where the partial derivatives are taken while holding the displacement, δ, constant. This yields the same answer for both single sided (ss) and double sided (ds) cases:










W
b

=

{







(

l
6

)


3
/
4





k

1
/
4



δ

1
/
2






(



ε
0


ε






V
2


d

)


3
/
4






V
>

V

P





I








k





δ




V
<

V

P





I











and






(

Equation





5

)







V

P





I


=



(


6

d


k





l






ε
o


ε


)


1
/
2




W
b






(

Equation





6

)













The pull-in voltage, V


PI


, is the applied voltage at which the actuator rolls or zips closed, which corresponds to the voltage at which the two expressions for W/b in Equation (5) are equal. These expressions are valid for both models—with and without centerplanes.




At 0 V, the displacement is defined solely by the spring constant of the structure. If a fixed external load W is applied to the actuator, it will open to a displacement δ. As the voltage is increased from zero, an electrostatic force develops, but this electrostatic force is not large enough to move the actuator. However, once the pull-in voltage V


PI


is reached, the displacement δ begins to decrease. This increases the actuator force even more, while the external load remains fixed at W, so the actuator pulls completely in.




Since the expression for force (Equation 5) is identical for single and double sided designs, it can be concluded that only single sided electrodes are needed. This has a number of advantages. First, single side electrode processing is easier and cheaper than double side electrode processing. Double side electrode processing typically exposes the electrode and dielectric on one side to scratching, etc. while processing the other side. This may reduce the yield relative to a single side electrode process. In addition, many polymer sheets have one side that is rougher than the other. Single sided electrode processing allows only the smooth side to be processed. This is particularly important since the spacing between layers can be important to the operation of the actuator.




Another advantage of providing a single sided electrode is that the input power requirements may be reduced. The energy expended by the electrical power source in actuating a load is the sum of the mechanical work done on the load and the electrical energy stored in the capacitor: U=Wδ+CV


2


/2. The capacitance of the actuator with double-sided electrodes is twice that of the actuator with single-sided electrodes. Therefore, twice as much electrical energy must be stored in the actuator with double-sided electrodes. Yet no additional mechanical work is performed. Further, fewer electrical interconnects may be needed.




Yet another advantage of using single-sided electrodes is that the manufacturing process may be more readily controllable with regard to the thickness of the adhesive near the gap between facing electrodes of each sheet pair. In particular, in

FIG. 6

, the thickness of lower adhesive


118


is much more important than the thickness of upper adhesive


116


, which does not control the gap between facing electrodes. Upper adhesive


116


bonds adjacent pairs of contracting sheets. Similarly, in

FIG. 7

, the thickness of adhesive


120


may be critical in establishing the gap between facing electrodes, but the adhesive securing the non-electrode faces of the adjacent sheets bonds together adjacent pairs of contracting sheets. In manufacture, the two facing electrode layers can be carefully laminated using a first process designed to control the thickness of the adhesive. In one method, adhesive is not used at all, and the two facing electrode sheets are joined together using an alternate method such as heat bonding requiring little or no adhesive, insuring a very close gap between the electrode layers. The resulting “sheet pairs” can then be secured together, back to back, using a second method designed to preserve the previously formed bonds between sheets, at the possible expense of control of adhesive thickness or absolute adhesive thickness.




The force equation (5) above can also be used to compare the designs with and without the flat centerplane. From the spring constant equations (Equation 3), an actuator without centerplanes has a spring constant half that of an actuator with centerplanes. That is, they have different mechanical responses. If the actuator without centerplanes is modified so that its length is l/(2)





, the two actuators have the same spring constant. Thus, at zero voltage, the two structures have exactly the same response (restoring force and displacement) to an externally applied load. For a given applied force, the pull-in voltage (Equation 6) of the design without the centerplanes is only (2)





=1.12 times the pull-in voltage of the design with centerplanes, since V


PI


has a dependence on length. However, the small increase in pull-in voltage is outweighed by the much simpler fabrication of the design without centerplanes.




Numerous advantages of the invention covered by this document have been set forth in the foregoing description. It will be understood, however, that this disclosure is, in many respects, only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts without exceeding the scope of the invention. The invention's scope is, of course, defined in the language in which the appended claims are expressed.



Claims
  • 1. A method for forming an actuator array device comprising:providing a first sheet having a front surface and a back surface; providing a second sheet having a front surface and a back surface; applying a thin conductive film on said first sheet and second sheet, and applying a dielectric film over said conductive film to locate and pattern one or more electrodes on said first and second sheets; and defining a first trench in the front surface of the first sheet; providing an adhesive in the first trench; positioning the front surface of the first sheet adjacent the front surface of the second sheet so that the first trench is adjacent the second sheet; and moving the first sheet into engagement with the second sheet.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1 further comprising:defining a second trench in the front surface of the second sheet; and positioning the front surface of the first sheet adjacent the front surface of the second sheet so that the first trench is in registration with the second trench.
  • 3. A method according to claim 2 further comprising:providing an adhesive in the second trench.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first trench has a length, and the adhesive does not extend the full length of the first trench.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first trench extends through the first sheet from the front surface to the back surface.
  • 6. A method according to claim 1 further comprising applying at least one catalyst to cure the adhesive.
  • 7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the catalyst is heat.
  • 8. A method according to claim 6 wherein the catalyst is UV radiation.
  • 9. A method according to claim 6 wherein the catalyst is pressure.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/613,489, filed Jul. 11, 2000. This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/233,368 to Cabuz et al., filed Dec. 29, 1998, entitled “POLYMER MICROACTUATOR ARRAY WITH MACROSCOPIC FORCE AND DISPLACEMENT”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,608; and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/476,667 to Horning, filed Dec. 30, 1999, entitled “MICROACTUATOR ARRAY WITH INTEGRALLY FORMED PACKAGE”, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,013, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Government Interests

This invention was made with government support under DARPA contract Number F30602-98-0217. The government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (22)
Number Name Date Kind
2975307 Schroeder et al. Mar 1961 A
3070775 Andrews, Jr. Dec 1962 A
4135108 Besson Jan 1979 A
4234245 Toda et al. Nov 1980 A
4295010 Murphy Oct 1981 A
4654546 Kirjavainen Mar 1987 A
5144528 Watanabe et al. Sep 1992 A
5176358 Bonne et al. Jan 1993 A
5206557 Bobbio Apr 1993 A
5290400 Bobbio Mar 1994 A
5350966 Culp Sep 1994 A
5413489 Switky May 1995 A
5434464 Bobbio et al. Jul 1995 A
5438232 Inoue et al. Aug 1995 A
5517467 Fromont et al. May 1996 A
5534740 Higuchi et al. Jul 1996 A
5563466 Rennex et al. Oct 1996 A
5682075 Bolleman et al. Oct 1997 A
5757456 Yamazaki et al. May 1998 A
5761782 Sager Jun 1998 A
6184608 Cabuz et al. Feb 2001 B1
6255758 Cabuz et al. Jul 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
C. Cubuz, et al. “High Reliability Touch-Mode Electrostatic Actuators”, Technical Digest of the Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, S.C., Jun. 8-11, 1998, pp. 296-299.
C. Cabuz, “Tradeoffs in MEMS Materials” Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 2881, pp. 160-170, Austin TX.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/613,489, filed Jul. 11, 2000, entitled “MEMS Actuator With Lower Power Consumption And Lower Cost Simplified Fabrication.”
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/476,667, filed Dec. 30, 1999, entitled “Microactuator Array With Integrally Formed Package.”