This application is a national stage application filed under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/FR2010/000824, filed Dec. 8, 2010, which claims priority from French Application No. 0905971, filed Dec. 10, 2009, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The invention relates to a process for treating a silicon substrate for manufacturing photovoltaic cells, preventing efficiency decrease under illumination. The invention also relates to a process for manufacturing photovoltaic cells using the treated substrate.
Many studies have aimed to produce low-cost silicon feedstock that will be used for growing single-crystal and polycrystalline ingots and for pulling ribbon wafers for manufacturing photovoltaic cells. This “low-cost” feedstock may be obtained by metallurgical purification of the silicon. Metallurgical purification is a purification method in which the silicon never passes into the gaseous phase.
The metallurgically obtained feedstock often contains much greater amounts of dopant impurities (mainly boron and phosphorus) than electronic grade silicon feedstock. In this metallurgically obtained feedstock, the quantities of boron (electron acceptor atom in silicon) and phosphorus (electron donor atom in silicon) are often of the same order of magnitude. “Compensated feedstock” is spoken of.
Photovoltaic cells manufactured using such feedstock often have an energy conversion efficiency that decreases under illumination. This effect is related to the formation, under illumination, of complexes associating a boron atom in a substitutional position (Bs) with an oxygen dimer (O2i). Under illumination the (mobile) oxygen dimer diffuses toward the (immobile) boron atom. The complex formed introduces a deep energy level into the bandgap of the silicon, thereby making recombination of free charge possible, and consequently reducing the lifetime of charge carriers and the energy conversion efficiency of the cell. This degradation has a substantial effect on the conversion efficiency of the cells. Specifically, the efficiency reduction may be about 8 rel. %. This reduction is calculated in the following way: (final efficiency−initial efficiency)/initial efficiency.
Thus, it is important to provide solutions capable of reducing or even preventing the effects of this degradation.
The object of the invention is therefore to provide a process for manufacturing photovoltaic cells that reduces the efficiency degradation under illumination.
To this end, the invention relates to a process for treating a silicon substrate for manufacturing photovoltaic cells, comprising the following steps:
According to other embodiments:
The invention also relates to a process for fabricating photovoltaic cells, comprising the following steps:
Other features of the invention will become clear from the detailed description below, given with reference to the appended figures, which respectively show:
According to the invention, carrying out a high-temperature anneal before forming the p-n junction by localized diffusion of dopant elements allows the degradation of the conversion efficiency under illumination to be reduced and even prevented.
The anneal according to the invention consists in heating the silicon substrate to a temperature of between 880° C. and 930° C. for a time of between one and four hours. Preferably, the anneal is carried out at a temperature of 900° C.±about 10° C. for two hours±about 10 minutes.
This anneal must be carried out before the step of forming the p-n junction (by localized diffusion of dopant elements: phosphorus if the substrate is p-type, or by diffusion of boron if the substrate is n-type).
This anneal has a particularly beneficial effect on the efficiency stability of the photovoltaic cell if the substrate (silicon wafers or blocks) contains a total carbon content (dissolved and precipitated carbon) of between 2×1018 cm−3 and 1019 cm−3 with, preferably, a carbon content of 6.5×1018 cm−3.
These high carbon contents may simply be related to contamination of the silicon with carbon caused by the purification process. The carbon may also be intentionally introduced in a previous step in the manufacture of the substrate (ingot growth).
Thus, in accordance with the invention, this anneal may be implemented at various points during the fabrication of a PV cell:
Preferably, the anneal is carried out in a POCl3 stream. This is because the diffusion of phosphorus produces an external gettering (extraction and trapping at the surface) of metal impurities, thus improving the electrical properties of the material or extracting possible initially precipitated metallic impurities that redissolve under the effect of the high temperatures used in the anneal.
A comparative study was carried out. In this study, the silicon wafers used were crystallized from metallurgically purified feedstock. The boron and phosphorus content in the feedstock (therefore before crystallization of the ingot) was 1.8×1017 cm−3 and 4.3×1017 cm−3, respectively. These concentrations were measured by GDMS (glow-discharge mass spectrometry).
After crystallization, the part of the ingot used was p-type.
Three wafers were used in this study. These three wafers were obtained by sawing the ingot three times in succession at about 20% of the height of the ingot (lower part of the ingot). Thus, the wafers were “juxtaposed” in the ingot. By proceeding in this way it was ensured that the wafers had properties that were as similar as possible.
The KOH texturing was carried out in two steps of 2×20 minutes. Between these two texturing steps the first wafer, called the “reference” wafer, was not annealed, the second wafer was annealed at 900° C. for 2 hours in a nitrogen stream, and the third wafer was subjected to the same anneal but in a POCl3 stream. The anneal was carried out in a conventional tube furnace. After the texturing, the wafers were subjected to a standard industrial process for manufacturing p-type cells (diffusion of phosphorus in a conventional tube furnace so as to produce at least one p-n junction, deposition of an antireflective SiN:H film on the front side, deposition of metal electrodes by screen printing, coanneal in a tunnel furnace and opening of the junction).
After the process, the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of these cells were measured under illumination. Next, the cells were placed on a hotplate at 50° C. under 1 sun of illumination (AM 1.5, 0.1 W. cm−2) and the variation in the open circuit voltage (Voc) was measured (
This is also illustrated in
This figure shows that the additional annealing step did not alter the electrical performance of the cells. In contrast, the initial efficiency (dotted histogram) of the cells that were annealed is higher. In addition, the reduction in the efficiency under illumination for the reference cell is 2.5 rel. % whereas it is almost zero for the cells that were annealed (hatched histogram).
The above experimental study was repeated on other materials with various amounts of compensation. Most of these materials were compensated metallurgically purified silicon, but the study was also extended to uncompensated chemically purified silicon. All the silicon wafers used were polycrystalline wafers.
For polysilicon, a temperature of 900° C. is the best for the anneal because above this temperature polysilicon is thermally unstable (dissolution of metal precipitates, propagation of dislocations, etc.). Nevertheless, the anneal may be carried out for this material at a temperature of up to 930° C., particularly when the anneal is carried out in POCl3, the dissolution of metal impurities then being counterbalanced by the external gettering produced by the phosphorus diffusion. At 930° C., an anneal one hour in length is sufficient to obtain effects equivalent to an anneal at 900° C. for 2 hours. As for the lowest temperature, an anneal at 880° C. can be envisioned. In contrast, the duration of the anneal will then have to be multiplied by two (anneal of 4 hours), thereby making industrial integration of the anneal more problematic.
Next, photovoltaic cells are produced in the conventional way using the substrate obtained according to the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09 05971 | Dec 2009 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2010/000824 | 12/8/2010 | WO | 00 | 7/25/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/070254 | 6/16/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20020121242 | Minami et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030207044 | Sopori | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005777 | Qu et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20090211635 | Niira et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090253225 | Dubois et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 107 619 | Oct 2009 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Perichaud I. et al. “Limiting Factors of Gettering Treatment in mc-Si Wafers from the Metallurgical Route,” Materials Science and Engineering B 159-160, (2009) 256-258. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/FR2010/000824 dated Jun. 6, 2011. |
Binetti, S. et al., Study of Defects and Impurities in Multicrystalline Silicon Grown From Metallurgical Silicon Feedstock, Materials Science and Engineering B 159-160 (2009) 274-277. |
Gee, J. M., Phosphorous Difficusions For Gettering-Induced Improvement of Lifetime in Various Silicon Materials, IEEE (1991) 116-123. |
Perichaud, I., Gettering of Impurities in Solar Silicon, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 72 (2002) 315-326. |
Perichaud, I. et al., Limiting Factors of Gettering Treatment in mc-Si Wafers from the Metallurgical Route, Materials Science and Engineering B 159-160 (2009) 256-258. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120329194 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |