1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a method for optical monitoring deposition and, in particular, to a method for monitoring thin film deposition using dynamic Interferometer.
2. Related Art
The optical monitoring method is generally thought better than other methods to manufacture optical filters, and for a costly optical filter manufacture, more precise optical monitor is necessary.
In a deposition thin film stack, the refractive indices of materials usually change so that suitable thickness of each layer would not be the same as what we expected in the original design; hence the termination point of each thin film layer needs to be revised. However, the conventional monitoring methods never analytically solve this problem. In the most conventional monitor system for coating deposition, only the transmittance and reflectance are measured. The deposition of quarter-wave film stack is usually terminated when the transmittance or reflectance locus reaches a local extreme value. However, the signal near the extreme value changes little with respect to increased thickness, and th extreme value e monitoring sensitivity is low. Among most methods, the turning points of extreme value are used to estimate the termination point of deposition in each layer. Some other monitoring methods, such as ellipsometry and broadband spectrum monitoring, use some computing algorithm to obtain optical constant by fitting the measurements, since the measurement includes too many parameters and they are hard to be solved analytically. There is no clearer rule to terminate the deposition through these monitors.
In this invention, a novel optical monitoring system is proposed to obtain the reflection coefficient, equivalent optical admittance, refractive index, and thickness of deposition film stacks analytically instead of applying numerical fitting. It provides higher precision in monitoring and more accurate error compensations. It helps the operator control the depositions more clearly, reduce the misjudgments of termination point of deposition, and improve the yield efficiency.
The purpose of this invention is to provide a novel method for monitoring thin film deposition. By using a new-type polarization interferometer, the phase and magnitude of the reflection coefficients of monitoring light normally reflected from the deposition films can be acquired in real time, and the physical property changes of thin films can also be analytically found.
This invention employs the dynamic interferometry to process monitor for thin film growth. It can provide reflection coefficient loci or equivalent optical admittance loci to do monitor and the corresponding error compensations. The change in thickness and refractive index can also be known for non-absorption films. For the termination points near the left cross point of the real axis, a phase shift of pi can be added on the measured phase, and recalculate the optical admittance in order to increase the sensitivity in monitoring.
The invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given herein below illustration only, and thus is not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
Attachment 1 is a diagram showing a phase shift of pi on the reflection phase and re-calculate the corresponding optical admittance.
The present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein the same references relate to the same elements.
Referring to
The monitor system is set up outside the coater chamber 100. A Fizeau polarization interferometer 101 combining with a pixelated phase mask camera 116 is used to extract the optical phase, as shown in
The quarter-wave plate 114 in front of the camera is oriented to convert two polarized beams coming from two arms of interferometer into two orthogonally circular polarization states. This quarter-wave plate 114 will make the reflection coefficient phase of thin films be derived from arctangent function of measured intensities rather than arccosine form. It provides higher sensitivity than the case without quarter-wave plate.
The lights go to the camera after passed through the imaging lens 115. The camera 116 has CCD array where each pixel has a polarizer on it, as shown in
I=I
L
+I
R−2√{square root over (ILIR )}cos(Φ+2α) (1)
where Φ(x, y)=φL−IL and IR are the intensities of left and right circle polarized beams.
The linear polarizer acts as a phase shifting device between the two beams, were the phase shift, 2α, is equal to twice the orientation angle of the polarizer.
The adjacent pixels on the camera have different orientation polarizer on them as shown in
The rays are drawn spatially separate and with a slight slant in the sketch,
Only the paired beams that are path matched and drawn in the same type of lines will interfere with each other, since the light has short coherence length. If we carefully adjust the translation stage of one arm of the Twyman-Green interferometer and let the distance to PBS 105 of the two mirrors 109, 110 have a difference of the optical thickness of substrate. Each successive reflection of the s-polarized beam off of the test surface is coherent with the p-polarized beam that has undergone one additional test surface reflection. Only the beam pair in which they undergo almost the same path lengths will have observable interference fringes; others will be suppressed due to low coherence.
The path matched S0 and P1, and S1 and P2, etc. are drawn with the same type of lines (e.g. dashed line for S0 and P1, dotted line for S1 and P2). The measured intensity can be presented as:
where Rr and Rt are the reflectance from the reference and test surfaces, respectively. φ is the phase difference between the two beams in each interfering beam pair.
The reflection phase of growing films coming from the test surface can be acquired by 4-step phase-shifting algorism in a single camera frame to freeze vibration effect:
where Φ is the desired phase.
The obtained data in several frames should be averaged to erase the air turbulence influence.
Although the optical phase can be calculated in real-time and the distance between reference and test surface, that is the substrate thickness, should remain the same during coating process, the mechanical vibration of two mirrors in Twyman-Green can cause different tilts and shifts from time to time that will change the path difference between reference and test beams and influence the accuracy of calculated phase results. One part on the substrate test surface should be blocked and remain uncoated as a reference area. Since the beam coming from the reference area and tested film area pass through common path, the vibration effect can be cancel by subtracting the phase difference between the reference area and the monitored area before the deposition from that after the deposition; then the pure reflection phase of films can be acquired.
There is a photo-detector placed under the coater to receive the transmitted light intensity change. The magnitude of the reflection coefficient, square root of the reflectance, can be further acquired. The reflectance can be measured by the camera and Eq. (2).
After reflectance magnitude and phase are acquired, the reflection coefficient at normal incidence of light is known and optical admittance can be calculated by following relation:
where γ and θ are the magnitude and phase of the reflection coefficient, and n0 is the refractive index of the incident medium.
In our case, the incident medium is substrate. Therefore, n0 is equal to the refractive index of the substrate ns. α and β are given by follows.
For non-absorption films, refractive index and thickness variation at every moment can also be calculated.
The optical admittance can be written down as:
where αE and βE are the real and imaginary part of the equivalent optical admittance of previously deposited film. δ is the optical phase thickness of newly deposited thin film, n is the corresponding refractive index.
The solutions of Eq. (6) are:
We should always choose the set of answer whose n and δ are positive. Thus, the complete information about reflection coefficient, optical admittance, refractive index and actual thickness of the growing film stack at every moment can be observed through this optical monitor system.
The monitoring sensitivity of monitoring of reflection coefficient or optical admittance loci, that is change amount per unit of optical phase thickness, should be analyzed in two parts, since the loci move in both two orthogonal directions, directions along the real and imaginary axis as thin film grows. The below equations show the sensitivities of optical admittance locus. Sensitivity X and Sensitivity Y represent sensitivities for real and imaginary parts of optical admittance, respectively.
where α and β are the real and imaginary part of the equivalent optical admittance of previous film stack, respectively. δ is optical phase thickness, and n is refractive index of thin film.
The sensitivity is low at the termination points of deposition at the left side of the circle of the locus, but in that case, the sensitivity can be greatly improved if we simply adding a phase shift of pi on the reflection phase and re-calculate the corresponding optical admittance, as shown in attachment 1.
Table 1 shows the comparison between the measurement results by monitor system and ellipsometer. Their results are very close to each other.
Referring to
Then, as the step S110, acquiring transmittance and the measured phase difference between coated area and blocked area of the substrate 14 for obtaining the reflection phase of the thin film. As the step S112, compare the initial phase difference with the measured phase difference to obtain and the reflection phase change, and compare the measured intensity with the initial intensity. It is to say, to subtract the initial phase difference from the measured phase difference for acquiring the reflection phase change of the grown thin film. The transmittance of the thin film is calculated by comparing the measured intensity with initial intensity. Then, as the step S114, calculate the reflection coefficient or optical admittance of the grown thin film, and record the loci as thin film deposition. As the Step S116, determining whether the loci reach the termination point of the thin film deposition or not according to the result of the Step S114. When the determination is yes, the next execution is the step S118. When the determination is no, the next execution is the step S108 to continue monitoring of the thin film deposition. Finally, as the step S118, terminate the thin film deposition.
Moreover, the real-time refractive index and thickness of deposition films can be analytically obtained. It provides a global and precise monitor for fabrications of thin film elements.
The reflection coefficient loci and optical admittance loci as thin film grows can be thereby monitored in this system. From these loci, operators can directly find better error compensations of depositions than transmittance or reflectance loci, since they include both magnitude and phase information of the films. Furthermore, a way to increase the sensitivity of the optical admittance loci monitoring is also proposed in this invention.
Although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, this description is not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications of the disclosed embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. It is, therefore, contemplated that the appended claims will cover all modifications that fall within the true scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
099142374 | Dec 2010 | TW | national |