Method of etching organic antireflection coating (ARC) layers

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention pertains to a method of etching organic antireflection coatings (ARCs), and in particular, bottom antireflection coatings (BARCs). Organic antireflection coatings, as indicated by their name, include carbon and hydrogen-containing materials, and are typically polymeric in nature. The antireflection coatings are part of an etch stack which is used to produce semiconductor devices, and they are pattern etched to submicron dimensions. The present method permits control over shifts in the critical dimension of the etched feature size, while providing uniform etching of ARCs across the entire surface of a semiconductor substrate, despite variation in spacing between features across the substrate surface.

2. Brief Description of the Background Art

In the field of semiconductor device fabrication, it is well recognized that as device feature sizes decrease to about 0.18 μm and smaller, mask patterning via photoresist materials requires the use of deep ultra violet wavelength (DUV) imaging radiation. Antireflective coatings are used in combination with DUV photoresists, among other photoresists, to reduce standing waves and back-scattered light, so that the dimensions of the patterning in the photoresist can be better controlled.

Generally, the photoresist is applied over a stack of other layers which are patterned as a part of the semiconductor device fabrication process. Some of the layers in the stack are consumed during the process of patterning underlying layers which become part of the functioning device. An ARC layer may be present at a number of different locations within a stack of layers, depending on the application. When the ARC layer is applied over the top of a layer stack, it is referred to as a top antireflective coating (TAR). When the ARC layer lies beneath the photoresist layer, it is commonly referred to as a bottom antireflective coating (BARC). TAR coatings are frequently removed during the photoresist patterning (developing) process, while BARC layers most often require a dry etching removal step.

Processes for the dry etching of organic ARCs usually are accomplished in a plasma etch system. ARC etching plasma source gases vary considerably in composition. Some examples of plasma source gas combinations include CHF

3

/CF

4

/Ar—O

2

; CF

4

/He—O

2

; O

2

/N

2

; HBr/O

2

; and HBr/CO

2

/O

2

—Ar.

In one process for etching organic antireflective coatings overlying a silicon-containing substrate, the substrate is placed into a process chamber and treated with a plasma. The plasma is generated from a process gas comprising oxygen and a compound selected from a group of compounds consisting of hydrogen and bromine-containing compounds, hydrogen and iodine-containing compounds, and mixtures thereof. Processing variables are adjusted to provide anisotropic etching of the organic antireflective coating.

In another etching process, an anti-reflection coating overlying a semiconductor substrate is etched by employing a plasma formed from a mixture of oxygen, nitrogen, and at least one inert gas. In an alternative method, the antireflective coating layer may be etched by employing a nitrogen plasma, which includes an inert gas, without any oxygen in the plasma, although the etch rate is said to be reduced.

Another method for plasma etching a BARC layer overlying a semiconductor substrate utilizes etch chemistry provided by a plasma processing gas which includes hydrogen bromide (HBr), CO

2

, and O

2

, with argon or another inert gas.

More information regarding the kinds of processes described above may be found in European Patent Publication No. EP 0820093, of Zhao et al., published Jan. 21, 1998; U.S. Pat. No. 5,910,453, to Gupta et al., issued Jun. 8, 1999; and European Patent Application No. EP 0859400, of Yang et al., published Aug. 19, 1998.

Uniformity of etching across a wafer has long been a concern, and, in general, the references pertaining to etching of organic antireflective coating layers place great emphasis on maintenance of the critical dimension of the feature being etched, such as a line width, contact pad dimension, gate size, and so on. Emphasis is also placed on the selectivity of the etch process, where the etch rate of an ARC layer is compared with the etch rate of an adjacent layer of material, such as a silicon-containing layer underlying the ARC layer, for example.

A very important variable, which has become more important with decreasing critical dimension size of etched features, is the etched feature critical dimension uniformity control across a substrate, such as a semiconductor wafer. For example, when the pattern being etched into an ARC layer is a series of lines and spaces, and the spacing between the lines is different at different positions on the substrate surface, the etch rate of the ARC may vary at different positions on the substrate surface. This may affect the depth of etch and may affect the profile of the feature being etched. It also affects the critical dimension uniformity across the substrate. The phenomenon of a change in overall etch performance across a substrate surface as a function of the spacing between etched features is sometimes referred to as a “microloading” effect. Differences in etch rate and/or etched feature profile occur in part because the availability of etchant species at a given position on the substrate surface varies, and the amount of etch byproduct which is produced varies as well. One of the reasons that the availability of etchant species and byproduct residue varies across a wafer surface is that the input and distribution of processing gases and the removal of processing gases and etch byproducts from the processing chamber is frequently not uniform. Another reason is that there is different spacing between pattern features at different locations (positions) on the substrate surface. Etch byproducts tend to be generated by two different mechanisms: 1) the use of etchant gas compositions which contain significant amounts of passivating gases (e.g., N

2

, or polymer-generating gases, such as carbon-containing gases), and/or 2) back-sputtering of etched material onto feature sidewalls during etching. Etchant gas-generated passivation layers (1) tend to build up on feature sidewalls relatively evenly over the substrate surface. Back-sputtered passivation layers (2) tend to deposit more on isolated feature areas of the substrate, where there is more back-sputtering because the amount of material being etched tends to be greater than in dense feature areas of the substrate.

Commonly owned, copending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/611,085, of Shen et al., discloses a process for plasma etching of ARC layers which is said to provide critical dimension uniformity across a substrate surface. The ARC etching process utilizes CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

chemistry. However, while this process provides excellent critical dimension uniformity across a substrate surface during etching of 1500 Å thick BARC layers, critical dimension uniformity is not as good when the process is used to etch thicker (e.g., 2000 Å) BARC layers. This is believed to be due to the longer etch time needed to etch a thicker BARC layer. Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a process for etching a BARC layer that would provide excellent critical dimension uniformity across a substrate surface, when etching thicker (>1500 Å thickness) BARC layers.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention includes a method of etching organic coating layers, and in particular, antireflective coating layers. The method provides improved critical dimension uniformity of the etched feature across the substrate surface, while providing selectivity favoring etching of the antireflective coating layer relative to an underlying silicon-containing layer. The present method has been shown to provide excellent critical dimension uniformity during etching of thicker (>1500 Å) organic coating layers.

We have discovered a method for etching an organic coating layer which provides unexpected control over the etched feature critical dimension, as well as the critical dimension uniformity across a substrate surface (CD shift range), despite a difference in the spacing between etched features over the substrate surface.

A two-step method is used to etch an organic coating layer. The first step of the method is a main etch step, during which essentially the entire thickness of the organic coating layer is etched to endpoint. The main etch utilizes a plasma generated from a first source gas comprising a fluorocarbon gas and a non-carbon-containing, halogen-comprising gas.

The second step of the method is an overetch step, during which residual coating layer material remaining on feature surfaces following the main etch step is removed. The overetch step utilizes a plasma generated from a second source gas comprising a chlorine-comprising gas, an oxygen-comprising gas, and an inert gas (i.e., a noble gas). This chemistry provides excellent (>20:1) selectivity for etching the organic coating layer relative to an underlying silicon-containing layer. Power applied to bias the substrate during the overetch step is less than the power applied to bias the substrate in the main etch step.

With reference to a pattern of lines and spaces (by way of example and not limitation), the etch chemistry and process conditions used in the main etch step produces a smaller etched line width in dense areas (where features are spaced closer together) than the etched line width in isolated areas (where features are spaced further apart). Typically, the etched line width in both the dense areas and the isolated areas is smaller than the line width of the photoresist used to pattern the organic coating layer (such as an ARC). This reduction in line width from the target line width is referred to as a “negative CD shift” or a “CD loss”. Thus, the negative CD shift is greater in the dense areas than in the isolated areas during the main etch. The negative CD shift across the substrate is referred to as the “CD shift range”.

As discussed above, the total amount of material being etched in isolated areas is greater than in dense areas; therefore, more polymeric material redeposits and builds up on isolated feature sidewalls during etching. This polymeric material build-up forms passivation layers which inhibit sidewall etching and slow the etch rate of isolated features. Further, the chemistry used in the main etch step includes CF

4

, which forms polymers which contribute to the build-up of passivation layers on isolated feature sidewalls during etching.

The etch chemistry and process conditions used in the overetch step produce a negative CD shift in the isolated areas which is greater than the negative CD shift in the dense areas. This is the opposite of the effect observed during the main etch step. Because most of the organic coating layer material has already been etched in the main etch step, build-up of passivation layers in isolated areas due to polymer deposition is no longer as much of a factor in the overetch step as it was during the main etch step. Further, the etch chemistry used in the overetch step does not include a polymer-producing (passivating) plasma source gas.

Another important processing variable is the substrate bias power used in the main etch step compared with the overetch step. The power applied to the substrate is lower in the overetch step than in the main etch step. As a result, there is less driving force to direct etchant species toward the substrate surface during the overetch step, which tends to slow the etch rate. This effect is more pronounced in dense feature areas than in isolated areas, because the narrower spacing between features in dense areas (higher aspect ratio) tends to protect exposed etched sidewall features from impacting reactive species. Therefore, the combination of etch chemistry and application of less substrate bias in the overetch step produces more rapid etching in isolated feature areas than in dense areas during the overetch step. Thus, there is a balancing effect when the main etch step is combined with the overetch step. This balancing effect reduces the CD shift range.

In summary, the present invention utilizes multiple etching steps which compensate for each other and take advantage of different mechanisms to achieve uniformity of etching across a substrate surface. Accordingly, disclosed herein is a method of etching an organic coating layer on a semiconductor substrate which utilizes a combination of the etch chemistries and substrate bias powers used in the main etch and overetch steps to balance etching in dense and isolated areas of a semiconductor substrate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A

shows a schematic of a preferred embodiment plasma processing apparatus of the kind which can be used to carry out the etching processes described herein.

FIG. 1B

shows a schematic of a substrate surface, indicating the bottom, left, center, right, and top locations of a substrate relative to the schematic of the processing apparatus shown in FIG.

1

A.

FIG. 2A

shows an etch stack

200

which represents a starting structure of the kind upon which the method of the present invention is performed. The etch stack

200

includes, from top to bottom, a patterned layer

210

of photoresist, an organic antireflection coating (ARC) layer

208

, a polysilicon layer

206

, and a silicon oxide gate dielectric layer

204

, all deposited on a silicon substrate

202

. The relative thicknesses of the film stack layers are not shown to scale.

FIG. 2B

shows the etch stack

200

after performance of the main etch step according to the method of the invention. The entire thickness of the ARC layer

208

has been etched to endpoint using a first plasma source gas, and an upper surface

207

of polysilicon layer

206

has been exposed. Residual ARC material overlies the polysilicon layer surface

207

on certain areas of the substrate surface.

FIG. 2C

shows the etch stack

200

after performance of the overetch step according to the method of the invention. Residual ARC material has been removed from the polysilicon layer surface

207

, without any significant etching of the polysilicon layer.

FIG. 3

shows a graph

300

of the shift

302

in critical dimension of the etched feature (i.e., the difference between the line width of the etched ARC and the line width in the photoresist used to pattern the ARC) as a function of the spacing

304

between etched features, at various locations on a substrate surface, when a plasma source gas of CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

was used to etch the organic ARC layer.

FIG. 4

shows a graph

400

of the shift

402

in critical dimension of the etched feature (as measured in dense and isolated areas of the substrate) as a function of the thickness

404

of the BARC layer, when a plasma source gas of CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

was used to etch the organic ARC layer.

FIG. 5

shows a graph

500

of the shift

502

in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing

504

between etched features, at various locations on a substrate surface, when a plasma source gas of CF

4

, Cl

2

, and N

2

was used to etch the organic ARC layer.

FIG. 6

shows a graph

600

of the shift

602

in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing

604

between etched features, at various locations on a substrate surface, when a plasma source gas of Cl

2

, O

2

, and Ar was used to etch the organic ARC layer.

FIG. 7

shows a graph

700

of the shift

702

in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing

704

between etched features, at various locations on a substrate surface, when a main etch chemistry of CF

4

and Cl

2

, and an overetch chemistry of Cl

2

, O

2

, and Ar, were used to etch the organic ARC layer.

FIG. 8

is a schematic of an Applied Materials' MXP+ polysilicon etch chamber, which is an alternative example of an apparatus of the kind which can be used to carry out the etching processes described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present disclosure provides a two-step method of etching an organic coating layer, such as an organic antireflection coating (ARC) layer. The method provides excellent critical dimension (CD) uniformity across a substrate surface, despite a variation in spacing between features across the substrate surface.

The first step of the method is a main etch step, during which essentially the entire thickness of the organic coating layer is etched to endpoint. The main etch utilizes a plasma generated from a first source gas comprising a fluorocarbon gas and a non-carbon-containing, halogen-comprising gas. The fluorocarbon gas is typically CF

4

, but may alternatively be, for example, CHF

3

, CH

2

F

2

, C

2

F

6

, C

4

F

8

, or a combination thereof. The non-carbon-containing, halogen-comprising gas is typically Cl

2

, but may alternatively be, for example, HBr, HCl, or any combination of Cl

2

, HBr, and/or HCl.

A first source gas comprising CF

4

and Cl

2

works particularly well. Typically, the volumetric ratio of CF

4

:Cl

2

in the first source gas ranges from about 1:1 to about 6:1, preferably, from about 2:1 to about 5:1. If needed, a minor amount of a passivating gas, such as N

2

or HBr, may be included in the CF

4

/Cl

2

source gas combination.

In an alternative, less preferred embodiment of the invention, a first source gas comprising CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

may be used to perform the main etch step. This particular combination of main etch plasma source gases produces an increase in the negative CD shift in comparison with the CF

4

/Cl

2

source gas combination.

A substrate bias power within the range of about 30 W to about 90 W is typically used during the main etch step.

The etch chemistry and process conditions used during the main etch step provide a higher etch rate in dense feature areas than in isolated feature areas of a semiconductor substrate.

The second step of the method is an overetch step, during which residual coating layer material remaining on feature surfaces following the main etch step is removed.

The overetch step utilizes a plasma generated from a second source gas comprising a chlorine-comprising gas, an oxygen-comprising gas, and an inert gas (i.e., a noble gas). The chlorine-comprising gas is typically Cl

2

. The chlorine-comprising gas is typically Cl

2

, but may alternatively be, for example, HCl. The oxygen-comprising gas is typically O

2

, which may be provided as He/O

2

(where O

2

is about 30 volume % of the He/O

2

mixture). The inert gas is typically argon, but may alternatively be a different noble gas, for example, helium, neon, xenon, krypton, or the inert gas may be a combination of noble gases. Typically, the volumetric ratio of Cl

2

:O

2

in the second source gas ranges from about 2:3 to about 3:1, preferably, from about 1:1 to about 3:1. In addition, the argon in the second source gas typically ranges from about 20 volume % to about 80 volume %, preferably, from about 30 volume % to about 50 volume %.

The substrate bias power used in the overetch step is lower than that used in the main etch step. An overetch substrate bias power that is less than 80%, and preferably less than 70%, of the substrate bias power used in the main etch step works particularly well.

An organic antireflection coating (ARC) layer is frequently part of a semiconductor structure, where the ARC layer overlies a layer of a silicon-containing material, such as polysilicon, which further overlies a gate dielectric layer. In order to avoid significant overetching of the ARC layer and pitting of the underlying polysilicon layer, the second source gas preferably provides a selectivity of at least 10:1 for etching the organic coating layer relative to polysilicon. (The term “selectivity” is typically used to refer to a ratio of etch rates of two materials.) It is important to avoid pitting of the polysilicon layer, because this pitting will transfer directly to the underlying (thin) dielectric layer during subsequent polysilicon layer etching and may cause a punch-through of the thin dielectric layer.

The chemistry and process conditions used in the main etch step produce a greater negative CD shift in dense feature areas than in isolated feature areas. The overetch chemistry and process conditions produce a greater negative CD shift in isolated feature areas than in dense feature areas, on the substrate. The main etch and the overetch thus counteract each other, resulting in a reduced CD shift range across the substrate surface and providing improved critical dimension uniformity across the substrate surface.

As a preface to the detailed description, it should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

I. An Apparatus for Practicing the Invention

The embodiment example etch processes described herein were carried out in a Centura® Integrated Processing System available from Applied Materials, Inc., of Santa Clara, Calif. The system is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,737 to Collins et al., the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Although the etch process chamber used to process the substrates described in the Examples presented herein is shown in schematic in

FIG. 1

, any of the etch processors available in the industry should be able to take advantage of the etch chemistry described herein, with some adjustment to other process parameters.

The equipment shown in schematic in

FIG. 1

includes a Decoupled Plasma Source (DPS) of the kind described by Yan Ye et al. at the Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Plasma Processing, May 7, 1996 and as published in the Electrochemical Society Proceedings, Volume 96-12, pp. 222-233 (1996).

FIG. 1

is a schematic of an individual CENTURA® DPS™ polysilicon etch chamber

102

of the type used in the Applied Materials' CENTURA® polysilicon etch system. The CENTURA® DPS™ polysilicon etch chamber

100

is configured to be mounted on a standard CENTURA® etch mainframe.

The CENTURA® DPS™ polysilicon etch chamber

100

consists of an upper chamber

104

having a ceramic dome

106

, and a lower chamber

108

. The lower chamber

108

includes a monopolar electrostatic chuck (ESC) cathode

110

. Gas is introduced into the chamber via gas injection nozzles

114

for uniform gas distribution. Chamber pressure is controlled by a closed-loop pressure control system (not shown) with a throttle valve

118

. During processing, a substrate

120

is introduced into the lower chamber

108

through inlet

122

. The substrate

120

is held in place by means of a static charge generated on the surface of electrostatic chuck (ESC) cathode

110

by applying a DC voltage to a conductive layer located under a dielectric film on the chuck surface. The cathode

110

and substrate

120

are then raised by means of a wafer lift

124

and a seal is created against the upper chamber

104

in position for processing. Etch gases are introduced into the upper chamber

104

via the ceramic gas injection nozzles

114

. The polysilicon etch chamber

100

uses an inductively coupled plasma source power

126

and matching network

128

operating at 12.56 MHZ which is connected to inductive coil

134

for generating and sustaining a high density plasma. The wafer is biased with an RF source

130

and matching network

132

operating at 13.56 MHZ. Power to the plasma source

126

and substrate biasing means

130

are controlled by separate controllers (not shown).

The temperature on the surface of the etch chamber walls is controlled using liquid-containing conduits (not shown) which are located in the walls of the etch chamber

100

. The temperature of the semiconductor substrate is controlled by stabilizing the temperature of the electrostatic chuck cathode

110

upon which the substrate

120

rests. The helium gas is used to facilitate heat transfer between the substrate and the pedestal. During the etch process, the substrate

120

surface is gradually heated by the plasma to a steady state temperature which is approximately 10 to 40° C. higher than the substrate support platen temperature, depending on the process conditions. It is estimated that the substrate surface temperature was typically around 40° C. to 85° C. during most of our experiments. The surface of the etching chamber

100

walls was maintained at about 65° C. using the cooling conduits previously described. The ceramic dome

106

was maintained at a temperature of about 80° C.

When the end point of an etch is signaled by the etch reaching an interface with a different material, an endpoint subsystem (not shown) senses the end of the etch process by monitoring changes in the light emitted by the plasma in the etch chamber

100

. Data is then displayed on a PC monitor. The operator sets an algorithm which controls the endpoint system.

FIG. 1B

shows a schematic of a substrate

120

surface

140

, including the bottom

142

, left

144

, center

146

, right

148

, and top

150

surface locations on substrate

120

(a silicon wafer in this case), relative to a notch

152

located at the bottom

142

of the substrate

120

. These surface locations are shown, relative to the schematic of the processing apparatus

100

shown in

FIG. 1B

, where arrow

154

indicates the direction toward vacuum throttle valve

118

, arrow

156

indicates the direction toward inlet

122

, and substrate

120

is shown resting on upper surface

158

of electrostatic chuck

110

.

Alternatively, the method of the invention may be performed in an etch processing apparatus wherein power to a plasma generation source and power to a substrate biasing means are controlled by a single power control, such as the Applied Materials' MXP or MXP+ polysilicon etch chamber.

FIG. 8

is a schematic of an Applied Materials' MXP+ polysilicon etch chamber

800

, which is a parallel plate plasma etch chamber of the kind which is well-known in the art. The MXP+ polysilicon etch chamber offers advantages over other similar etch chambers in that it includes a simplified, two-dimensional gas distribution plate

802

, which allows for more uniform gas distribution throughout the chamber. Another modification is a removable aluminum chamber liner

804

, which can be easily removed and replaced during each wet cleaning procedure, allowing for a more rapid cleaning cycle. Yet another modification is an improved focus ring

806

, which moves together with (rather than independently from) the cathode

808

, resulting in reduced particle generation due to fewer moving parts within the apparatus. The high temperature cathode

808

has independent temperature control (not shown), which functions in response to a temperature reading from pedestal temperature probe

812

, which permits operation at a temperature in excess of the process chamber temperature. The substrate to be processed (not shown) rests on an electrostatic chuck pedestal

810

, which is joined to cathode

808

.

II. The Method of the Invention for Etching Organic Antireflection Coating (ARC) Layers

Prior to performing the method of the invention, one must first provide a starting etch stack. A typical etch stack is described below.

FIG. 2A

shows an etch stack

200

which represents a starting structure of the kind upon which the method of the present invention is performed. The pattern is one of lines and spaces, and

FIG. 2A

illustrates a cross-sectional schematic of these lines and spaces.

Etch stack

200

includes the following layers, from top to bottom: a patterned layer

210

of photoresist; an organic antireflection coating (ARC) layer

208

; a silicon-containing layer

206

; and a gate dielectric layer

204

, all deposited on a substrate

202

.

The thickness and patterning method for the photoresist layer

210

will depend on the particular photoresist material used and the pattern to be imaged in the photoresist. Photoresist layer

210

may be any suitable photoresist material known in the art. Typically, the photoresist is an organic, carbon-containing material. Frequently, a deep ultra-violet (DUV) photoresist is used to transfer a pattern to a substrate. A typical film thickness for such a DUV photoresist ranges from about 4000 Å to about 6000 Å. In the starting etch stack etched in the Examples below, the photoresist

210

was a DUV photoresist having a thickness of about 6000 Å. DUV photoresists are available from either JSR® or SHIPLEY®, INC., for example, and not by way of limitation.

An ARC layer is frequently required when a DUV photoresist is used, to reduce standing waves and back-scattered light in general during the photoresist imaging process. Organic ARCs are preferred in some instances because they are more compatible with photoresists. The organic ARC layer

208

may be formed from any of the organic ARC materials known in the art, using conventional methods known in the art, such as a spin-on technique. The organic ARC layer

208

typically has a thickness within the range of about 300 Å to about 3000 Å. In the starting etch stack etched in the Examples below, the organic ARC layer

208

had a thickness of about 2000 Å.

The silicon-containing layer

206

is typically polysilicon or amorphous silicon. If desired (such as to provide a low resistance gate structure), the silicon-containing layer

206

may be doped. The silicon-containing layer

206

is typically formed to have a thickness within the range of about 1500 Å to about 3000 Å. In the starting etch stack etched in the Examples below, the silicon-containing layer

206

was polysilicon, which was deposited using a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique known in the art. Polysilicon layer

206

had a thickness of about 2000 Å.

Underlying polysilicon layer

206

is a thin gate dielectric layer

204

, which is typically an inorganic oxide, such as silicon oxide, silicon oxynitride, or tantalum pentoxide, for example. Alternatively, the gate dielectric layer may be an organic dielectric, such as a Poly(arylene)ether, a Polyl(arylene)ether oxazole, Parylene-N, a Polyimide, Polynaphthalene-N, a Polyphenyl-Quinoxaline, a Polybenzoxazole, Polyindane, Polynorborene, Polyphenyleneoxide, or an αC, for example.

A silicon oxide gate dielectric layer

204

is typically formed to have a thickness within the range of about 15 Å to about 100 Å. Other materials having different electrical properties may be applied at a different thickness. For example, in the starting etch stack etched in the Examples below, the gate dielectric layer

204

was silicon oxide, which had a thickness of about 60 Å. When tantalum pentoxide is used, the thickness of the gate dielectric layer may be lower than when silicon oxide is used. Such gate dielectric layers are typically formed or deposited using conventional methods known in the art, such as thermal oxidation or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).

The substrate

202

is typically silicon, but may alternatively be glass or silicon-on-insulator (SOI), for example. When the substrate is silicon, the silicon-containing layer

206

may be either polysilicon or amorphous silicon. However, when a glass substrate is used, the silicon-containing layer

206

must be amorphous silicon, because, in order to form polysilicon, an underlying silicon substrate is needed as a seed layer. Amorphous silicon can be deposited using conventional physical vapor deposition (PVD) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques.

According to one method of the invention, a main etch step is performed to etch through essentially the entire thickness of organic ARC layer

208

, exposing an upper surface

207

of polysilicon layer

206

, as illustrated in FIG.

2

B. The main etch step preferably utilizes a plasma generated from a source gas comprising CF

4

and Cl

2

. If needed, a minor amount of a passivating gas such as N

2

may be included in the first plasma source gas.

In an alternative, less preferred embodiment of the invention, a first source gas comprising CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

can be used to perform the main etch step. Compatible process conditions for use with this chemistry are described in detail in commonly owned, copending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/611,085, of Shen et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The endpoint of the main etch step is detected using a an optical emission spectroscopy (OES) endpoint detection system, at a wavelength of 4390 Å.

Referring to

FIG. 2C

, an overetch step is then performed to remove residual ARC material which remains on polysilicon layer surface

207

at the completion of the main etch step. The plasma source gas used in the overetch step preferably provides a selectivity of at least 10:1 for etching the organic ARC layer

208

relative to polysilicon layer

206

, in order to avoid significant overetching with the potential of pitting the surface of the polysilicon layer

206

. If the surface

207

of polysilicon layer

206

is pitted, this pitting may transfer to the underlying gate dielectric layer

204

. We have found that a plasma generated from a chlorine-comprising gas, an oxygen-comprising gas, and an inert gas (i.e., a noble gas) provides a selectivity of at least 20:1 for etching an organic ARC material relative to polysilicon.

Typical process condition ranges for the main etch and overetch steps are provided in Table One, below.

TABLE ONE

Typical Process Conditions for Organic ARC Layer

Main Etch and Overetch

Process Condition

Main Etch

Overetch

Total Gas Flow (sccm)

100-200

50-200

CF

4

(sccm)

50-150

—

Cl

2

(sccm)

10-100

10-100

N

2

(sccm)

0-50

—

O

2

(sccm)

—

10-50

Argon (sccm)

—

20-100

Plasma Source Power (W)

200-600

200-600

Substrate Bias Power (W)

30-90*

20-60*

Process Chamber Pressure

3-10

3-10

(mTorr)

Substrate Temp. (°C.)

30-65

30-65

Etch Time (sec)

30-120

5-40

Plasma Density (e

−

/cm

3

)

≧1 × 10

11

≧1 × 10

11

*Where the substrate biasing power applied in the overetch step is lower than the substrate biasing power applied in the main etch step.

III. EXAMPLES

The experiments described in the Examples below were performed using the etch stack

200

shown in

FIG. 2A

, as follows (layers listed from top to bottom): a 6000 Å DUV photoresist layer

210

(previously patterned); a 2000 Å organic ARC layer

208

; a 200 Å polysilicon layer

206

; and a 60 Å silicon oxide gate dielectric layer

204

, all deposited on a silicon substrate

202

. The etch stack was prepared using conventional techniques known in the art, as described above.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE ONE

The ARC layer

208

was etched using a plasma source gas of CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

. Process conditions, such as gas flow rates and bias power, were varied between experiments. The plasma source gas used during Run #3 also included N

2

; the plasma source gas used during Run #4 included argon (rather than nitrogen).

Table Two provides experimental process conditions and critical dimension data generated during etching of the ARC layer.

TABLE TWO

BARC Etching Using CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

Run #

1

2

3

4

5

6

CF

4

(sccm)

60

60

60

30

60

80

HBr (sccm)

20

20

20

10

20

20

O

2

(sccm)

40

40

40

20

20

40

N

2

(sccm)

—

—

30

—

—

—

Ar (sccm)

—

—

—

60

—

—

Source Power

300

300

300

300

300

300

(W)

Bias Power

90

75

90

90

90

90

(W)

Chamber Pres-

4

4

4

4

4

4

sure (mTorr)

Endpoint* (sec)

38.0

43.1

42.8

45.6

47.2

41.6

Overetch (sec)

7.6

8.6

8.5

9.1

9.4

8.3

Average CD

−44.4

−51.9

−45.6

−37.8

−22.5

−39.9

Shift (nm)

CD Shift

14.8

13.3

13.6

15.8

20.8

14

Range (nm)

*Endpoint determined by optical emission spectroscopy (OES).

Referring to Table Two, above, the term “CD shift” refers to the difference between the line width of the etched ARC and the line width in the photoresist used to pattern the ARC. Thus, a positive CD shift indicates that the etched CD is larger than the pattern CD prior to etch. A negative CD shift (also referred to as “CD loss”) indicates that the etched CD is smaller than the pattern CD prior to etch. “Average CD shift” refers to an average of CD shift measurements taken at various locations (e.g., top, center, bottom) on the substrate and for various feature spacings (dense vs. isolated).

“CD shift range” refers to the difference between the highest measured CD shift and the lowest measured CD shift, and is an indication of CD uniformity across the substrate surface. Variations in CD shift (indicated by the CD shift range) may be attributable to either geographic considerations (i.e., the location on the substrate surface) or demographic considerations (i.e., the spacing between the lines being etched) While it is highly desired to have a minimal CD shift, it is critical that the CD shift be consistent between different substrate locations and different feature spacings. If the CD shift (i.e., the difference between the line width of the etched ARC and the line width in the photoresist used to pattern the ARC) is relatively high, but the variation in CD shift (CD shift range) is low, this means that etching is occurring consistently across the substrate surface, and the etching process can be adjusted to compensate for the CD shift. However, it is very difficult to compensate for a high variation in CD shift, which signifies that the etching process is not consistent across the substrate surface.

FIG. 3

shows a graph

300

of the shift in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing between etched features, for Run #1. The shift in critical dimension (in μm) is shown on the axis labeled

302

, for an etched line in a pattern of lines and spaces. The shift in critical dimension is shown as a function of the spacing between the lines (in μm), on the axis numbered

304

. There are four plots on the graph: plot

306

represents a bottom location on a substrate, plot

308

represents a location on the left side of the substrate, plot

310

represents a center location on the substrate, and plot

312

represents a top location on the substrate, as illustrated with reference to FIG.

1

B.

Graph

300

makes it possible to look at the variation in critical dimension shift which is attributable to the location on the substrate surface and the variation in critical dimension shift which is attributable to differences in spacing between the lines being etched. Referring to

FIG. 3

, it is easy to see that the CD shift due to differences in spacing is much greater than the CD shift due to location on the substrate surface. The highest CD shift appears to be about −0.050 μm, and the lowest CD shift appears to be about −0.035 μm, for a CD shift range of approximately 0.015 μm (measured value: 14.8 nm). The average critical dimension shift was −44.4 nm. There is a trend toward greater CD loss in dense areas (i.e., areas having smaller space widths) of the substrate.

Due to the size reduction in semiconductor device structures, device fabricators are looking for a critical dimension shift variation (CD shift range) across the substrate (CD uniformity) of about 10 nm (0.01 μm) or less. An average CD shift of 30 nm (0.03 μm) or less is also desired. As indicated in Table Two, none of the combinations of plasma source gas composition and process conditions used during Runs #1-6 provided both the desired CD shift range and an acceptable average CD shift. In fact, there appeared to be a trade-off between average CD shift and CD shift range. As the average CD shift decreased, the CD uniformity across the substrate (as indicated by CD shift range) worsened (refer to Run #5). When the CD shift range was relatively low (indicating acceptable uniformity), the average CD shift was unacceptably high (refer to Run #2).

FIG. 4

shows a graph

400

of the shift in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the thickness of the BARC layer, for Run # 1. The shift in critical dimension (in μm) is shown on the axis labeled

402

, for an etched line in a pattern of lines and spaces. The shift in critical dimension is shown as a function of the thickness of the BARC layer (in Å), on the axis numbered

404

. There are two plots on the graph: plot

406

represents isolated lines on the substrate, and plot

408

represents a dense array of lines. As shown in

FIG. 4

, CD shift was acceptable (≦0.03 μm) when thinner BARC layers were etched. However, CD shift in both dense and isolated areas of the substrate increased as the thickness of the BARC layer increased above 1500 Å. This is believed to be due to the longer etch time needed to etch through a thicker BARC layer. It should also be noted that there is an increasing divergence between isolated

406

and dense

408

lines as the BARC layer thickness increases, indicating a worsening CD shift range.

EXAMPLE TWO

Upon reviewing the critical dimension data obtained for BARC etching using a plasma source gas of CF

4

, HBr, and O

2

, we determined that a new BARC etch process that would provide acceptable CD shift and CD uniformity during etching of thicker (i.e., greater than 1500 Å) BARC layers was needed.

The ARC layer

208

of the etch stack shown in FIG.

2

A and described above was etched using a plasma source gas of CF

4

, Cl

2

, and N

2

. Process conditions, such as plasma source power and bias power, were varied between experiments. The plasma source gas used during Run #13 also included argon; the plasma source gas used during Run #12 did not include N

2

.

Table Three provides experimental process conditions and critical dimension data generated during etching of the ARC layer.

TABLE THREE

BARC Etching Using CF

4

, Cl

2

, and N

2

Run #

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

CF

4

(sccm)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Cl

2

(sccm)

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

N

2

(sccm)

20

20

20

20

20

0

20

20

Ar (sccm)

—

—

—

—

—

—

10

—

Source Power (W)

315

315

500

315

250

315

315

315

Bias Power (W)

50

50

50

90

40

50

50

30

Chamber Pressure

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

(mTorr)

Endpoint* (sec)

62

64.8

52

49.3

78.2

52

59

76.6

Overetch (sec)

18

12.9

11

9.8

15.6

20

8

15.3

Average CD Shift

−19.2

−16.2

−22.2

4.5

−16.4

−18.5

−21.8

−25.8

(nm)

CD Shift Range

17.2

18

23.3

44.7

18.3

15.9

18.9

15.7

(nm)

*Endpoint determined by optical emission spectroscopy (OES).

As indicated in Table Three, none of the combinations of plasma source gas composition and process conditions used during Runs #7-14 provided both the desired CD shift range (≦10 nm) and an acceptable average CD shift (≦30 nm). As also observed in Runs #1-6, there appeared to be a trade-off between average CD shift and CD shift range. As the average CD shift decreased, the CD uniformity (as indicated by CD shift range) worsened (refer to Run #10). When the CD shift range was relatively low (indicating acceptable uniformity), the average CD shift was unacceptably high (refer to Run #14).

FIG. 5

shows a graph

500

of the shift in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing between etched features, for Run #14. The shift in critical dimension (in μm) is shown on the axis labeled

502

, for an etched line in a pattern of lines and spaces. The shift in critical dimension is shown as a function of the spacing between the lines (in μm), on the axis numbered

504

. There are five plots on the graph: plot

506

represents a bottom location on a substrate, plot

508

represents a location on the left side of the substrate, plot

510

represents a center location on the substrate, plot

512

represents a location on the right side of the substrate, and plot

514

represents a top location on the substrate.

Again, the CD shift due to differences in spacing is much greater than the CD shift due to location on the substrate surface. The CD shift range was 15.7 nm, with an average CD shift of −25.8. Again, there was a trend toward greater CD loss in dense areas (i.e., areas having smaller space widths between features) of the substrate.

EXAMPLE THREE

We decided to investigate the use of a chlorine and oxygen-based plasma for etching organic BARC layers. The experiment summarized in Table Four, below, utilized a plasma source gas of Cl

2

, O

2

, and argon.

TABLE FOUR

BARC Etching Using Cl

2

, O

2

, and Argon

Run #

15

Cl

2

(sccm)

18

O

2

(sccm)

18

Ar (sccm)

20

Source Power (W)

210

Bias Power (W)

33

Chamber Pressure (mTorr)

3

Endpoint* (sec)

74.7

Overetch (sec)

15

Average CD Shift (nm)

−26.6

CD Shift Range (nm)

18.6

*Endpoint determined by optical emission spectroscopy (OES).

FIG. 6

shows a graph

600

of the shift in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing between etched features, for Run #15. The shift in critical dimension (in μm) is shown on the axis labeled

602

, for an etched line in a pattern of lines and spaces. The shift in critical dimension is shown as a function of the spacing between the lines (in μm), on the axis numbered

604

. There are five plots on the graph: plot

606

represents a bottom location on a substrate, plot

608

represents a location on the left side of the substrate, plot

610

represents a center location on the substrate, plot

612

represents a location on the right side of the substrate, and plot

614

represents a top location on the substrate.

The CD shift range was 18.6 nm, with an average CD shift of 26.6. However, the use of the Cl

2

/O

2

/Ar etch chemistry in Run #15 resulted in a trend toward greater CD loss in isolated areas (i.e., areas having larger space widths between features) of the substrate, which was the opposite of the trend toward greater CD loss in dense areas observed when either the CF

4

/HBr/O

2

(Runs #1-6) or CF

4

/Cl

2

/N

2

(Runs #7-14) etch chemistries were used.

The Cl

2

/O

2

/Ar etch chemistry provided excellent (>20:1) selectivity for etching the BARC layer

208

relative to the underlying polysilicon layer

206

.

EXAMPLE FOUR

The next set of experiments involved using a first etch chemistry for the BARC main etch, followed by a second etch chemistry for the overetch step. The main BARC etch utilized a plasma source gas of CF

4

and Cl

2

, optionally in combination with N

2

(in Runs #16-18). The overetch step utilized a plasma source gas of Cl

2

, O

2

, and argon. Process conditions, such as gas flow rates, plasma source power, and bias power, were varied between experiments.

Table Five provides experimental process conditions for both the main BARC etch and overetch steps, as well as critical dimension data generated during etching of the ARC layer.

TABLE FIVE

BARC Etching Using CF

4

/Cl

2

Main Etch and Cl

2

/O

2

/Ar Overetch

Run #

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Main Etch

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Chemistry

CF

4

CF

4

CF

4

CF

4

CF

4

CF

4

CF

4

(sccm)

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

20

20

10

N

2

N

2

N

2

Source

315

315

315

315

315

315

315

Power (W)

Bias Power

30

30

50

50

60

50

50

(W)

Chamber

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Pressure

(mTorr)

Endpoint

77.7

74.6

56.8

50.8

47.6

51.8

50.8

(sec)

Overetch

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

Chemistry

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

Cl

2

(sccm)

18

18

18

18

18

12

18

O

2

O

2

O

2

O

2

O

2

O

2

O

2

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

Ar

Ar

Ar

Ar

Ar

Ar

Ar

Source

210

300

300

300

300

300

300

Power (W)

Bias Power

33

30

30

30

30

30

30

(W)

Chamber

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Pressure

(mTorr)

Endpoint

15

10

7

10

10

10

10

(sec)

Average CD

−34.0

−35.3

−22.8

−26.2

−24.3

−29.2

−28.2

Shift (nm)

CD Shift

Range (nm)

13.8

13.1

14.7

8.5

11.9

11.2

9.5

As discussed above, the CF

4

/Cl

2

etch chemistry shows a trend toward greater CD loss in dense areas, whereas the Cl

2

/O

2

/Ar etch chemistry shows a trend toward greater CD loss in isolated areas of the substrate. As shown in Table Five, above, the microloading trends of the main etch and overetch chemistries appear to compensate for each other, resulting in improved CD uniformities across the substrate. Runs #19 and 22 (which utilized the same plasma source gas composition and process conditions) provided average CD shifts of less than 30 nm and CD shift ranges of less than 10 nm.

FIG. 7

shows the shift in critical dimension of the etched feature as a function of the spacing between etched features, for Run #19. The shift in critical dimension (in μm) is shown on the axis labeled

702

, for an etched line in a pattern of lines and spaces. The shift in critical dimension is shown as a function of the spacing between the lines (in μm), on the axis numbered

704

. There are five plots on the graph: plot

706

represents a bottom location on a substrate, plot

708

represents a location on the left side of the substrate, plot

710

represents a center location on the substrate, plot

712

represents a location on the right side of the substrate, and plot

714

represents a top location on the substrate.

The improved CD uniformity obtained using the ARC etch method of the invention can be clearly seen in the graph

700

in

FIG. 7

, when compared with the CD uniformity data shown in any of the preceding

FIGS. 3

,

4

,

5

, and

6

.

The above described preferred embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, as one skilled in the art can, in view of the present disclosure expand such embodiments to correspond with the subject matter of the invention claimed below.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4919748	Bredbenner et al.	Apr 1990	A
5772906	Abraham	Jun 1998	A
5910453	Gupta et al.	Jun 1999	A
6001538	Chen et al.	Dec 1999	A
6004850	Lucas et al.	Dec 1999	A
6004853	Yang et al.	Dec 1999	A
6013582	Ionov et al.	Jan 2000	A
6040248	Chen et al.	Mar 2000	A
6136676	Saito	Oct 2000	A
6156485	Tang et al.	Dec 2000	A
6156629	Tao et al.	Dec 2000	A

Number	Date	Country
EP 0820093	Jan 1998	EP
EP 0859400	Aug 1998	EP

Method of etching organic antireflection coating (ARC) layers

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (11)

Foreign Referenced Citations (2)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)