The invention relates to a semiconductor structure and method of manufacture and, more particularly, to a structure having a sealed gate oxide layer and method of manufacture.
A MOSFET device, amongst other features, has a metal oxide capacitor, consisting of a gate and gate oxide layer. In such a device, the gate oxide material is layered underneath the gate spanning between the source and the drain region of the device. The dielectric constant k of the gate oxide material and the thickness d of the gate oxide layer determine the capacitance and field homogeneity and thus, the device performance. Damage to the gate oxide layer during the manufacturing process may result in either device failure or at minimum, in an undesired reduction of device performance. Therefore, in order to achieve satisfactory device performance, the gate oxide layer should remain intact during manufacture of the semiconductor device.
In conventional processes, a MOSFET precursor comprises a substrate, e.g., a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) region. A layer of gate oxide is deposited onto the entire wafer surface. In a subsequent step, a polysilicon gate is fabricated, in conventional manners, at a desired location over the gate oxide layer. At this stage and prior to etching the source and drain region, the polysilicon gate is protected by silicon nitride at its sidewalls and top surface, e.g., a nitride sidewall and cap, respectively. The nitride sidewall and cap layers are typically very thick, in the ranges of upwards of 20 nm. Once the nitride sidewall and cap layers are formed, the source and drain regions are etched by anisotropic methods such as reactive ion etching (RIE). This results in the structure comprising a polysilicon gate with the thick nitride sidewall and cap layer, and the underlying gate oxide layer that is laterally exposed to the source and drain wells.
Prior to filling the source and drain wells with epitaxial material, the wells undergo an isotropic cleaning to remove any native oxide material that was generated during the previous steps, e.g., etching of the wells. During this so-called EPI pre-clean step, the oxide material is treated with hydrogen fluoride or similar reagents to generate volatile reaction products. After removal of the volatile products, the surface of the source and drain region comprises pure silicon which serves as basis for growth of the epitaxial material of the source and drain region.
However, the isotropic EPI pre-clean step also etches away unprotected areas of the gate oxide layer. That is, during the EPI pre-clean, the gate oxide layer is subject to the removal reagents which removes portions of the gate oxide layer, resulting in an undercut of up to 5 nm or more under the gate. This effectively shortens the length of the gate oxide layer and exposes portions of the gate. Prior to removing the nitride sidewall, the wells are filled to form the source and drain region. The material, which is used to fill the source and drain, will also fill the undercut region and hence come into direct contact with the gate.
Thus, if the gate oxide is undercut too much, the material for filling the source and drain region will come into contact with the gate, itself. This will result in failure of the device. Accordingly, to avoid device failure, in conventional device manufacture, the protective sidewalls are 10 nm or thicker to ensure that the undercut, during the cleaning process, does not corrode the gate oxide to such an extent that the gate becomes exposed in the undercut. However, due to the thickness of the sidewalls, i.e., 10 nm or greater, the conventional device has a source well to drain well distance greater than the actual gate length, thus ensuring that there will be no shorting but also negatively affecting device performance.
In a first aspect, the present invention is directed to a structure comprising a gate oxide layer formed on a substrate and a gate formed on the gate oxide layer. The structure further includes a material abutting walls of the gate and formed within an undercut underneath the gate to protect regions of the gate oxide layer exposed by the undercut. Source and drain regions are isolated from the gate by the material.
In another aspect, the invention is directed towards a method for manufacturing a device. The method comprises forming a layer on a substrate and forming a gate on the layer. An undercut is formed under the gate by removing portions of the layer. A barrier layer is formed within the undercut to protect the layer from corrosion during subsequent processing steps. Source and drain regions are also processed.
In a further aspect, the method includes forming a gate on a substrate. The gate includes a gate oxide layer formed between the substrate and the gate. The method further includes etching portions of the gate oxide layer to form an undercut under the gate. The exposed portions of the gate oxide layer are protected while forming sidewalls abutting the gate. The source and drain wells are formed into the substrate adjacent the gate and filled with conductive material.
The gate oxide layer 14 can comprise any appropriate metal oxide material. The gate oxide layer 14 is, in embodiments, determined by the desired capacitance of the gate using a high dielectric constant (k) material with low dielectric leakage current, for example. In embodiments, the gate oxide layer may be exchanged with a nitride layer or other appropriate material such as, for example, silicon oxide. In further embodiments, the gate layer 14 can comprise a thickness between approximately 0.5 nm to 3 nm. However, the thickness of the gate oxide layer 14 may vary depending on any number of known parameters such as the gate oxide material, itself. Therefore, in view of the various factors for generating a desired capacitance, thickness outside the above-described region are equally contemplated by the invention.
Still referring to
In embodiments, an isotropic etching leads to lateral removal of material underneath the gate 16 causing an undercut. Such undercut underneath the gate 16 can reach dimensions of up to 5 nm per side.
As shown in
In embodiments, the sidewalls which are formed from the protective layer 20 do not require added thickness to avoid undercut erosion of the gate oxide 12 in subsequent processing steps. This is due to the fact that the protective barrier 20 is provided within the undercut, as compared to conventional methods which do not have any protective material within the undercut. Thus, in the case of this embodiment, the sidewalls formed from the protective layer 20 can be 10 nm or less in thickness and, even with this thickness, under gate erosion can be avoided. This will prevent shorts from occurring in subsequent processing steps.
Also, it is important to note that since the gate stack is now completely enclosed, no additional material, e.g., precautionary thickness for the sidewalls, is necessary to prevent gate oxide corrosion and gate undercut. Thus, the thickness of the sidewalls can be reduced to the minimum necessary for protecting the gate stack from exposure to any subsequent process steps. This in turn, also reduces the distance between the gate oxide and the source and drain regions.
It is noted that the device performance increases using the fabrication method of the invention. For example, shorting of the device is prevented. In addition, the eSiGe grown source/drain edge can be closer to the transistor channel, improving transistor performance.
Still referring to
As shown in
As in the previous embodiment described above, the sidewalls formed from the protective layer 20 do not require added thickness to avoid undercut erosion in subsequent processing steps. This is due to the protective layer 20 being provided within the undercut thus protecting the oxide layer from any corrosion. In the case of this embodiment, the thickness of the sidewalls formed from the protective layer 20 can be significantly minimized to about 10 nm or less in thickness and, again, gate erosion can be avoided. This will prevent shorts from occurring in subsequent processing steps.
Thus, as with the previous embodiment, since the gate stack is now completely enclosed, no additional material, e.g., precautionary thickness for the sidewalls, is necessary to prevent gate oxide corrosion and gate undercut. Thus, the thickness of the sidewalls can be reduced to the minimum necessary for protecting the gate stack from exposure to any subsequent process steps.
In
Still referring to
The methods as described above are used in the fabrication of integrated circuit chips. The resulting integrated circuit chips can be distributed by the fabricator in raw wafer form (that is, as a single wafer that has multiple unpackaged chips), as a bare die, or in a packaged form. In the latter case, the chip is mounted in a single chip package (such as a plastic carrier, with leads that are affixed to a motherboard or other higher level carrier) or in a multichip package (such as a ceramic carrier that has either or both surface interconnections or buried interconnections). In any case the chip is then integrated with other chips, discrete circuit elements, and/or other signal processing devices as part of either (a) an intermediate product, such as a motherboard, or (b) an end product. The end product can be any product that includes integrated circuit chips, ranging from toys and other low-end applications to advanced computer products having a display, a keyboard or other input device, and a central processor.
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with the modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, the invention can be readily applicable to bulk substrates.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/468,403, filed on Aug. 30, 2006, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602841 | McGroddy | Aug 1971 | A |
4665415 | Esaki et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853076 | Tsaur et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855245 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4952524 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958213 | Eklund et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5006913 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060030 | Hoke et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108843 | Ohtaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310446 | Konishi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371399 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391510 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5459346 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471948 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5557122 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561302 | Candelaria | Oct 1996 | A |
5565697 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5670798 | Schetzina | Sep 1997 | A |
5679965 | Schetzina | Oct 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5861651 | Brasen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880040 | Sun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5940716 | Jin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940736 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5960297 | Saki | Sep 1999 | A |
5989978 | Peidous | Nov 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6025280 | Brady et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6066545 | Doshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090684 | Ishitsuka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096580 | Hannon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107143 | Park et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117722 | Wuu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133071 | Nagai | Oct 2000 | A |
6141245 | Houghton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165383 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6221735 | Manley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246095 | Brady et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255169 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261964 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265317 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274444 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284623 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284626 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319794 | Akatsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323535 | Iyer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346846 | Houghton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361885 | Chou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362082 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368931 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388305 | Houghton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396120 | Tonti et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396121 | Tonti et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403486 | Lou | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406973 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433404 | Iyer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461936 | Von Ehrenwall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476462 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483171 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493497 | Ramdani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498056 | Williams et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501121 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506652 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509618 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514808 | Samavedam et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521964 | Jan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531369 | Ozkan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531740 | Bosco et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6570207 | Tonti et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6577156 | Ouellette et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6621324 | Tonti et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621392 | Volant et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624031 | Abadeer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624499 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633055 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635506 | Volant et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6717216 | Doris et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6753590 | Tonti et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6794726 | Tonti et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6825529 | Chidambarrao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6879021 | Fifield et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882027 | Brintzinger et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6972614 | Smith, III et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974981 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977194 | Belyanski et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015082 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010009784 | Ma et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020063292 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086472 | Roberds et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030032261 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040158 | Saitoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057184 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067035 | Tews et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040051162 | Chidambarrao et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040113174 | Chidambarrao et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113217 | Chidambarrao et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040132236 | Doris et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040238914 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262784 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029601 | Chen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040460 | Chidambarrao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082634 | Doris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087824 | Cabral et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093030 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098829 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106799 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112857 | Gluschenkov et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145954 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148146 | Doris et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194699 | Belyansky et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236668 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245017 | Belyansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280051 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282325 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027868 | Doris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057787 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060925 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060938 | Tonti et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087001 | Kothandaraman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060102982 | Park et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108662 | Kothandaraman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060128071 | Gauthier et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
64-76755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080057673 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11468403 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 11841018 | US |