Method of manufacturing a warp resistant thermally conductive circuit package

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6190939
  • Patent Number
    6,190,939
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 14, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 20, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
An integrated circuit package for improved warp resistance and heat dissipation is described. The LOC package includes: an integrated circuit die having an upper, active face, and a multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame mounted to the active face of the die, where the lead frame is preferably comprised of layers configured as Cu/INVAR/Cu or Cu/Alloy 42/Cu. The choice of the middle layer of the lead frame is selected to minimize the warping forces on the package such that the coefficient of thermal expansion of the composite lead frame approximates that of silicon. The copper layers of the lead frame provide improved heat dissipation.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The field of the invention relates to a lead-on-chip (LOC) integrated circuit package which includes a multi-layered lead frame for improved heat dissipation and warp resistance.




2. Brief Description of the Related Technology




For greater heat dissipation, integrated circuit (IC) packages sometimes utilize a lead-on-chip (LOC) design, where a substantially planar lead frame is mounted to an IC die. The lead frame is usually comprised of a single electrically and thermally conductive material, such as copper or alloy


42


. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,221,642 and 5,448,450, both assigned to the common assignee of the present invention. Other LOC IC packages include a single material lead frame which is electrically and thermally conductive and which is thinned in an area over the die to which it is mounted. See application Ser. No. 08/688,340, filed Jul. 30, 1996, assigned to the common assignee of the present invention.




To minimize the warping forces on an IC package, a warp resistant material having a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) selected to balance the warping forces extant on the IC package during assembly, testing or operation is mounted to one or more exterior surfaces of the IC package. Examples of such warp resistant packages and the techniques used to select the appropriate warp resistant material layers are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,369,056, 5,369,058, and 5,581,121, and in application Ser. No. 08/644,491, filed May 10, 1996, pending, all assigned to the common assignee of the present invention.




A need exists for a LOC IC package which controls package warping, allows for improved thermal dissipation, but does not require a warp resistant material layer mounted to the package exterior or require that the LOC lead frame be thinned in an area directly over the die.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




To resolve the need, the present invention includes an IC package in a LOC configuration which includes a multi-layered lead frame of uniform thickness over the active face of the die. The materials and thickness of the various layers of the lead frame are selected to ensure improved heat dissipation and to minimize package warping forces.




Preferably, the lead frame has three layers, with the first and third layers being copper, and the second layer being a warpage control material sandwiched between the first and third layers. The warpage control layer may be, for example, INVAR or alloy


42


material which has the effect of lowering the CTE of the composite lead frame such that it approximates that of silicon. Using this type of LOC configuration, warp resistant material layers mounted to the package exterior are not necessary in many applications.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a partial cross-sectional view of the IC package of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




As illustrated in

FIG. 1

, each IC package


10


includes an integrated circuit die


14


which includes an active face


24


which includes die bonding pads (not shown). A multi-layered substantially planar lead frame


12


overlays the active face


24


of die


14


to provide electrical connectivity, improve thermal coupling and, as configured, improve warp resistance for package


10


. Although not shown, the portions of lead frame


12


which extend beyond the perimeter of die


14


protrude through an edge of a casing


26


to form external electrical leads for the package.




Lead frame


12


is multi-layered and is mounted and adhered to the active face


24


of die


14


by adhesive layer


16


, which is preferably a two-sided adhesive polyimide film, such as KAPTON by DuPont. Such a two-sided film typically has a thin layer of high temperature epoxy applied to both sides of the film. Adhesive layer


16


may otherwise be a high temperature adhesive epoxy, such as Rogers Corp. R/flex (R) 8970, which is a B-staged phenolic butyryl epoxy which is typically laminated at a temperature of about 130° C. and cured at a temperature of about 175° C. Alternatively, lead frame


12


may be adhered to die


14


using molding compound, or using other single or double-sided adhesives, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,279,029, 5,367,766 and 5,221,642, all of which are assigned to the common assignee of the present invention and which are all incorporated herein for all purposes. For either the one or two-sided adhesive or epoxy embodiment for adhesive layer


16


, first layer


22


of lead frame


12


is mounted to the active face


24


of die


14


by the adhesive layer


16


.




Multi-layer lead frame


12


is preferably about 5.0 mils thick and includes: a first layer


22


of copper approximately 0.75 mils thick, a third layer


18


of copper approximately 0.75 mils thick, and a second layer


20


of a warp resistant material, such as INVAR or alloy


42


material, approximately 3.5 mils thick sandwiched between first layer


22


and second layer


18


of lead frame


12


. Preferably, the ratio of the amount of copper to the total amount of material comprising lead frame


12


ranges from about 20% to 33%. Alternatively, first and third lead frame layers,


22


and


18


respectively, may each be an INVAR layer about 2.0 mils thick. In such an embodiment, the middle second lead frame layer is a layer of copper about 1.0 mils thick. This alternative embodiment, however, might not perform as well electrically as the prior described embodiment. Lead frame


12


is thus configured as a multilayered metal or metallic composite element configured as layers of Cu/INVAR/Cu, Cu/Alloy


42


/Cu, or INVAR/Cu/INVAR.




Alloy


42


is a metal composition made up of about 42% nickel and 58% iron and INVAR is an iron-nickel based alloy being about 63% iron and 46% nickel. Although both alloy


42


and INVAR are less efficient in heat dissipation than other materials, such as copper, both alloy


42


and INVAR provide an advantage in preventing warpage, while heat dissipation is adequately provided by heat dissipating elements or layers, such as first layer


22


and third layer


18


of lead frame


12


, where the first and third layers are preferably copper.




Lead frame


12


may be manufactured by electroplating copper to a thin sheet of INVAR or alloy


42


which has been rolled or stamped, using known methods, to flatten the thin sheet and to form electrical conductors for lead frame


12


. Alternatively, the thin sheet of INVAR or alloy


42


may first be electroplated with a copper layer and then flattened to thin the thin sheet and to form the electrical conductors. If the conductors are formed by etching, lead frame


12


would first be electroplated with a copper layer after the etching process because of the different chemical processes required for etching the INVAR or alloy


42


layer versus etching the copper layer.




Regardless of the method used to manufacture lead frame


12


, the goal is to make the CTE of the composite lead frame


12


as close as possible to the CTE of silicon die


14


. The closer the CTE of lead frame


12


and the CTE of silicon are to being equal, the more warp resistant package


10


becomes.




Integrated circuit package


10


is preferably thin in profile, and without the preventive measures described herein could warp during fabrication or use due to dissimilar coefficients of thermal expansion in the various layers or component parts which comprise package


10


. As illustrated in

FIG. 1

, to prevent warping while still maintaining a thin profile, thin, warp resistant second layer


20


of lead frame


12


is provided in conjunction with first and third layers


22


and


18


. Second layer


20


preferably has a CTE less than that of silicon and is disposed between the first and third layers


22


and


18


as described. The CTE of the second layer


20


in combination with the CTE of first and third layers


22


and


18


results in a composite lead frame


12


CTE approximating that of silicon.




In extremely thin package applications, where the thickness of die


14


is reduced, it may be desirable to adhere or otherwise attach a thin metal layer to the lower inactive surface of die


14


to improve warp resistance and thermal dissipation, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,766, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein for all purposes.




In these embodiments, the CTE of the material used for second layer


20


is selected to thermally balance and make warp resistant the entire package


10


without requiring a warp resistant material layer to be mounted to the exterior surface of package


10


. Thus, the present invention provides a method of warpage control that minimizes the differential thermal expansion forces and moments between the material layers on either side of a neutral thermodynamic axis passing through the package


10


assembly. The neutral thermodynamic axis is chosen for convenience to be the plane through the center of lead frame


12


. The total set of warpage-causing moments on either side of the neutral thermodynamic axis includes the sum of the moments associated with each layer comprising package


10


, relative to the neutral thermodynamic axis. For a particular layer, the moment, m, is proportional to the following product:








m


≡(


E


)(


h


)(


t


)Δ(


a


)Δ(


T


)






where m is the moment of the package layer; E is the Young's modulus of elasticity of the material of the package layer; h is the moment-arm distance measured from the center of the particular package layer being calculated to the neutral thermodynamic axis; t is the thickness of the particular package layer; Δ(a) is the difference between the CTE of the particular package layer being calculated and the CTE of the material containing the neutral thermodynamic axis; and Δ(T) is the temperature difference between the assembly bonding temperature, operating temperature, storage temperature, or other temperature of interest.




The product Δ(a)Δ(T) is the source of the warping forces and moments, the product (E)(t) is the deflection compliance of the particular package layer associated with the differential force for that layer, and h is the lever arm allowing the differential force to produce a moment with its resulting warpage.




To calculate the forces, the product in the above equation for the moment, m, is evaluated for each package layer on one side of the neutral thermodynamic axis. These values are then summed. The process is repeated for the package layers on the opposite side of the neutral thermodynamic axis. The two sums are then compared. The dimensions and CTE of the package materials to be used for the various layers in package


10


, including each layer of lead frame


12


, are adjusted until the sums are either equal or acceptably close enough in value to assure acceptably low values of warpage. In other words, the vectorial summation of all moments of each package layer is selected to be as close to zero as possible.




Another advantage of the present invention is that one can asymmetrically locate elements formed of different, or non-identical, materials in each package


10


and thermally balance them. Thus, integrated circuit die


14


does not have to be symmetrically centered within package


10


to obtain thermal balance throughout package


10


. Application of the method of the present invention allows compensation for material and orientation asymmetries to prevent warping.




The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory of the preferred embodiments. Changes in the size, shape, materials and individual components used, elements, connections and construction may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing an integrated circuit package having improved heat dissipation and warp resistance, comprising the steps of:a) providing an integrated circuit die having an upper surface; b) mounting a multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame to said upper surface of said die; and c) electrically connecting the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame to said upper surface of said die; wherein each of the layers of the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame are formed with materials selected so that warping forces associated with said package are balanced.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame comprises first, second, and third layers.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the first and third layers of the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame are copper.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the second layer of the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame is INVAR.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the second layer of the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame is alloy 42.
  • 6. A method of manufacturing an integrated circuit package having improved heat dissipation and warp resistance, comprising the steps of:a) providing an integrated circuit die having an active surface; b) mounting a multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame to said active surface of said die; and c) electrically connecting the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame to said active surface of said die; wherein each of the layers of the multi-layered, substantially planar lead frame are formed with materials selected so that warping forces associated with said package are balanced.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/815,537, filed Mar. 12, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,732.

US Referenced Citations (63)
Number Name Date Kind
3436604 Hyltin et al. Apr 1969
3614546 Avins Oct 1971
3713893 Shirland Jan 1973
3739462 Hasty Jun 1973
4103318 Schwede Jul 1978
4158745 Keller Jun 1979
4241493 Andrulits et al. Dec 1980
4288841 Gogal Sep 1981
4321418 Dran et al. Mar 1982
4437235 McIver Mar 1984
4451973 Tateno et al. Jun 1984
4521828 Fanning Jun 1985
4525921 Carson et al. Jul 1985
4530152 Roche et al. Jul 1985
4630172 Stenerson et al. Dec 1986
4633573 Scherer Jan 1987
4680617 Ross Jul 1987
4684975 Takiar et al. Aug 1987
4722060 Quinn et al. Jan 1988
4733461 Nakano Mar 1988
4763188 Johnson Aug 1988
4796078 Phelps, Jr. et al. Jan 1989
4821148 Kobayashi et al. Apr 1989
4823234 Konishi et al. Apr 1989
4829403 Harding May 1989
4833568 Berhold May 1989
4839717 Phy et al. Jun 1989
4855868 Harding Aug 1989
4862245 Pashby et al. Aug 1989
4862249 Carlson Aug 1989
4878106 Sachs Oct 1989
4884237 Mueller et al. Nov 1989
4891789 Quattrini et al. Jan 1990
4948645 Holzinger et al. Aug 1990
4953005 Carlson et al. Aug 1990
4953060 Lauffer et al. Aug 1990
4994411 Naito et al. Feb 1991
4997517 Parthasarathi Mar 1991
5014113 Casto May 1991
5015803 Mahulikar et al. May 1991
5016138 Woodman May 1991
5041015 Travis Aug 1991
5049527 Merrick et al. Sep 1991
5057906 Ishigami Oct 1991
5065277 Davidson Nov 1991
5086018 Conru et al. Feb 1992
5089876 Ishioka Feb 1992
5099393 Bentlage et al. Mar 1992
5108553 Foster et al. Apr 1992
5134463 Yamaguchi Jul 1992
5138430 Gow, 3rd et al. Aug 1992
5138434 Wood et al. Aug 1992
5139969 Mori Aug 1992
5147822 Yamazaki et al. Sep 1992
5151559 Conru et al. Sep 1992
5155068 Tada Oct 1992
5157478 Ueda et al. Oct 1992
5214845 King et al. Jun 1993
5216283 Lin Jun 1993
5223739 Katsumata et al. Jun 1993
5367766 Burns et al. Nov 1994
5888631 Sylvester Mar 1999
5939214 Mahulikar et al. Aug 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
57-31166 Feb 1982 JP
58-96756A Jun 1983 JP
58-112348 Jul 1983 JP
61-163652 Jan 1985 JP
60-180150A Sep 1985 JP
63-153849 Jun 1988 JP
63-53959 Aug 1988 JP
3-125440 May 1991 JP
4207061 Jul 1992 JP