The present disclosure is related to methods of laser processing of materials. More particularly, the present disclosure is related to methods of singulation and/or cleaving of wafers, substrates, and plates.
In current manufacturing, the singulation, dicing, scribing, cleaving, cutting, and facet treatment of wafers or glass panels is a critical processing step that typically relies on diamond cutting, with speeds of 30 cm/sec for flat panel display as an example. After diamond cutting, a mechanical roller applies stress to propagate cracks that cleave the sample. This process creates poor quality edges, microcracks, wide kerf width, and substantial debris that are major disadvantages in the lifetime, quality, and reliability of the product, while also incurring additional cleaning and polishing steps. The cost of de-ionized water to run the diamond scribers are more than the cost of ownership of the scriber and the technique is not environmentally friendly since water gets contaminated and needs refining that itself adds the costs. By advance techniques dyes on the wafers are getting smaller and closer to each other that limit the diamond scribing. 30 μm is a good scribing width and 15 μm is challenging. Since diamond scribing uses mechanical force to scribe the substrate, thin samples are very difficult to scribe. The FPD industry is seeking to reduce glass thicknesses to 150-300 μm from conventional 400-700 μm that is used currently and scribing the plates is the major issue. Indeed the FPD industry is looking to use thin tempered glass instead of ordinary glass for durability.
Laser ablative machining is an active development area for singulation, dicing, scribing, cleaving, cutting, and facet treatment, but has disadvantages, particularly in transparent materials, such as slow processing speed, generation of cracks, contamination by ablation debris, and moderated sized kerf width. Further, thermal transport during the laser interaction can lead to large regions of collateral thermal damage (i.e. heat affected zone). Laser ablation processes can be dramatically improved by selecting lasers with wavelengths that are strongly absorbed by the medium (for example, deep UV excimer lasers or far-infrared CO2 laser). However, the above disadvantages cannot be eliminated due to the aggressive interactions inherent in this physical ablation process.
Alternatively, laser ablation can also be improved at the surface of transparent media by reducing the duration of the laser pulse. This is especially advantageous for lasers that are transparent inside the processing medium. When focused onto or inside transparent materials, the high laser intensity induces nonlinear absorption effects to provide a dynamic opacity that can be controlled to accurately deposit appropriate laser energy into a small volume of the material as defined by the focal volume. The short duration of the pulse offers several further advantages over longer duration laser pulses such as eliminating plasma reflections and reducing collateral damage through the small component of thermal diffusion and other heat transport effects during the much shorter time scale of such laser pulses. Femtosecond and picosecond laser ablation therefore offer significant benefits in machining of both opaque and transparent materials. However, machining of transparent materials with pulses even as short as tens to hundreds of femtosecond is also associated with the formation of rough surfaces and microcracks in the vicinity of laser-formed hole or trench that is especially problematic for brittle materials like glasses and optical crystals. Further, ablation debris will contaminate the nearby sample and surrounding surfaces.
A kerf-free method of cutting or scribing glass and related materials relies on a combination of laser heating and cooling, for example, with a CO2 laser and a water jet. [U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,284 (Kondratenko); U.S. Pat. No. 6,787,732 UV laser (Xuan)] Under appropriate conditions of heating and cooling in close proximity, high tensile stresses are generated that induces cracks deep into the material, that can be propagated in flexible curvilinear paths by simply scanning the laser-cooling sources across the surface. In this way, thermal-stress induced scribing provides a clean splitting of the material without the disadvantages of a mechanical scribe or diamond saw, and with no component of laser ablation to generate debris. However, the method relies on stress-induced crack formation to direct the scribe and requires [WO/2001/032571 LASER DRIVEN GLASS CUT-INITIATION] a mechanical or laser means to initiate the crack formation. Short duration laser pulses generally offer the benefit of being able to propagate efficiently inside transparent materials, and locally induce modification inside the bulk by nonlinear absorption processes at the focal position of a lens. However, the propagation of ultrafast laser pulses (>˜5 MW peak power) in transparent optical media is complicated by the strong reshaping of the spatial and temporal profile of the laser pulse through a combined action of linear and nonlinear effects such as group-velocity dispersion (GVD), linear diffraction, self-phase modulation (SPM), self-focusing, multiphoton/tunnel ionization (MPI/TI) of electrons from the valence band to the conduction band, plasma defocusing, and self-steepening [S L Chin et al. Canadian Journal of Physics, 83, 863-905 (2005)]. These effects play out to varying degrees that depend on the laser parameters, material nonlinear properties, and the focusing condition into the material.
Kamata et al. [SPIE Proceedings 6881-46, High-speed scribing of flat-panel display glasses by use of a 100-kHz, 10-W femtosecond laser, M. Kamata, T. Imahoko, N. Inoue, T. Sumiyoshi, H. Sekita, Cyber Laser Inc. (Japan); M. Obara, Keio Univ. (Japan)] describe a high speed scribing technique for flat panel display (FPD) glasses. A 100-kHz Ti:sapphire chirped-pulse-amplified laser of frequency-doubled 780 nm, 300 fs, 100 μJ output was focused into the vicinity of the rear surface of a glass substrate to exceed the glass damage threshold, and generate voids by optical breakdown of the material. The voids reach the back surface due to the high repetition rate of the laser. The connected voids produce internal stresses and damage as well as surface ablation that facilitate dicing by mechanical stress or thermal shock in a direction along the laser scribe line. While this method potentially offers fast scribe speeds of 300 mm/s, there exists a finite kerf width, surface damage, facet roughness, and ablation debris as the internally formed voids reach the surface.
In a first embodiment, there is provided a method of preparing a substrate for cleavage, the method comprising the steps of: irradiating the substrate with one or more pulses of a focused laser beam, wherein the substrate is transparent to the laser beam, and wherein the one or more of pulses have an energy and pulse duration selected to produce a filament within the substrate; translating the substrate relative to the focused laser beam to irradiate the substrate and produce an additional filament at one or more additional locations; wherein the filaments comprise an array defining an internally scribed path for cleaving the substrate. The method preferably includes the step of cleaving the substrate.
The substrate is preferably translated relative to the focused laser beam with a rate selected to produce a filament spacing on a micron scale. Properties of the one or more laser pulses are preferably selected to provide a sufficient beam intensity within the substrate to cause self-focusing of the laser beam.
The one or more pulses may be provided two or more times with a prescribed frequency, and the substrate may be translated relative to the focused laser beam with a substantially constant rate, thus providing a constant spacing of filaments in the array.
The one or more pulses include a single pulse or a train of two or more pulses. Preferably, a time delay between successive pulses in the pulse train is less than a time duration over which relaxation of one or more material modification dynamics occurs. A pulse duration of each of the one or more pulses is preferably less than about 100 ps, and more preferably less than about 10 ps.
A location of a beam focus of the focused laser beam may be selected to generate the filaments within the substrate, wherein at least one surface of the substrate is substantially free from ablation. A location of a beam focus of the focused laser beam may be selected to generate a V groove within at least one surface of the substrate.
The substrate may be a glass or a semiconductor and may be selected from the group consisting of transparent ceramics, polymers, transparent conductors, wide bandgap glasses, crystals, crystal quartz, diamond, and sapphire.
The substrate may comprise two or more layers, and wherein a location of a beam focus of the focused laser beam is selected to generate filaments within at least one of the two or more layers. The multilayer substrate may comprise multi-layer flat panel display glass, such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), flat panel display (FPD), and organic light emitting display (OLED). The substrate may also be selected from the group consisting of autoglass, tubing, windows, biochips, optical sensors, planar lightwave circuits, optical fibers, drinking glass ware, art glass, silicon, III-V semiconductors, microelectronic chips, memory chips, sensor chips, light emitting diodes (LED), laser diodes (LD), and vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL).
A location of a beam focus of the focused laser beam may be selected to generate filaments within two or more of the two or more layers, wherein the focused laser beam generates a filament in one layer, propagates into at least one additional layer, and generates a filament is the at least one additional layer.
Alternatively, the location of a beam focus of the focused laser beam may be first selected to generate filaments within a first layer of the two or more layers, and the method may further comprise the steps of: positioning a second beam focus within a second layer of the two or more layers; irradiating the second layer and translating the substrate to produce a second array defining a second internally scribed path for cleaving the substrate. The substrate may be irradiated from an opposite side relative to when irradiating the first layer. Furthermore, prior to irradiating the second layer, a position of the second beam focus may be laterally translated relative a position of the beam focus when irradiating the first layer. A second focused laser beam may be used to irradiate the second layer.
A further understanding of the functional and advantageous aspects of the disclosure can be realized by reference to the following detailed description and drawings.
Embodiments of the disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:
Various embodiments and aspects of the disclosure will be described with reference to details discussed below. The following description and drawings are illustrative of the disclosure and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the present disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to provide a concise discussion of embodiments of the present disclosure.
As used herein, the terms, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed as being inclusive and open ended, and not exclusive. Specifically, when used in the specification and claims, the terms, “comprises” and “comprising” and variations thereof mean the specified features, steps or components are included. These terms are not to be interpreted to exclude the presence of other features, steps or components.
As used herein, the term “exemplary” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration,” and should not be construed as preferred or advantageous over other configurations disclosed herein.
As used herein, the terms “about” and “approximately”, when used in conjunction with ranges of dimensions of particles, compositions of mixtures or other physical properties or characteristics, are meant to cover slight variations that may exist in the upper and lower limits of the ranges of dimensions so as to not exclude embodiments where on average most of the dimensions are satisfied but where statistically dimensions may exist outside this region. It is not the intention to exclude embodiments such as these from the present disclosure.
As used herein, the term “transparent” means a material that is at least partially transparent to an incident optical beam. More preferably, a transparent substrate is characterized by absorption depth that is sufficiently large to support the generation of an internal filament by an incident beam according to embodiments described below.
Short duration laser pulses 10 are focused with objective lens 12 inside transparent substrate 14. At appropriate laser pulse energy, the laser pulse, or sequence of pulses, or burst-train of pulses, a laser filament 18 is generated within the substrate, producing internal microstructural modification with a shape defined by the laser filament volume. By moving the sample relative to the laser beam during pulsed laser exposure, a continuous trace of filament tracks 20 are permanently inscribed into the glass volume as defined by the curvilinear or straight path followed by the laser in the sample.
Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that the filaments are produced by weak focusing, high intensity short duration laser light, which can self-focus by the nonlinear Kerr effect, thus forming a so-called filament. This high spatio-temporal localization of the light field can deposit laser energy in a long narrow channel, while also being associated with other complex nonlinear propagation effects such as white light generation and formation of dynamic ring radiation structures surrounding this localized radiation.
On the simplest level, the filamentation process is believed to depend mainly on two competing processes. First, the spatial intensity profile of the laser pulse acts like a focusing lens due to the nonlinear optical Kerr effect. This causes the beam to self-focus, resulting in an increase of the peak intensity. This effect is limited and balanced by increasing diffraction as the diameter decreases until a stable beam waist diameter is reached that can propagate distances many times longer than that expected from a simple calculation of the confocal beam parameter (or depth of focus) from this spot size.
At high peak intensity, multiphoton ionization, field ionization, and electron impact ionization of the medium sets in to create low-density plasma in the high intensity portion of the laser beam. This plasma temporarily lowers the refractive index in the centre of the beam path causing the beam to defocus and break up the filament. The dynamic balance between Kerr effect self-focusing and plasma defocusing can lead to multiple re-focused laser interaction filaments through to formation of a stable filament, sometimes called a plasma channel. As show in the examples below, using picosecond pulses, the present inventors have found that when the pulse focuses, it stays confined for about 500 to 1000 μm (depending on the focusing lens which is used), and then spatially diverges when there is no more material for refocusing and forming the next filament, or when the pulses do not have enough energy to refocus to form another plasma channel.
Optical breakdown, on the other hand, is the result of a tightly focused laser beam inside a transparent medium that forms a localized dense plasma around the geometrical focus. The plasma generation mechanism is based on initial multi-photon excitation of electrons, followed by inverse Bremsstrahlung, impact ionization, and electron avalanche processes. Such processes underscore the refractive index and void formation processes described above [U.S. Pat. No. 6,154,593; SPIE Proceedings 6881-46], and form the basis of most short-pulse laser applications for material processing. In this optical breakdown domain, the singulation, dicing, scribing, cleaving, cutting, and facet treatment of transparent materials has disadvantages such as slow processing speed, generation of cracks, contamination by ablation debris, and large kerf width.
In contrast, laser filamentation offers a new direction for internal laser processing of transparent materials that can avoid ablation or surface damage, dramatically reduce kerf width, avoid crack generation, and speed processing times for such scribing applications. Further, high repetition rate lasers defines a new direction to enhance the formation of laser beam filaments with heat accumulation and other transient responses of the material on time scales faster than thermal diffusion out of the focal volume (typically <10 microseconds).
Accordingly, embodiments disclosed herein harnesses short duration laser pulses (preferably with a pulse duration less than about 100 ps) to generate a filament inside a transparent medium. The method avoids dense plasma generation such as through optical break down that can be easily produced in tight optical focusing conditions as typically applied and used in femtosecond laser machining. In weak focusing, which is preferential, the nonlinear Kerr effect is believed to create an extended laser interaction focal volume that greatly exceeds the conventional depth of focus, overcoming the optical diffraction that normally diverges the beam from the small self-focused beam waist.
Once a filamentation array is formed in the transparent substrate, only small mechanical pressure is required to cleave the substrate into two parts on a surface shape that is precisely defined by the internal laser-filamentation curtain. The laser-scribed facets typically show no or little cracking and microvoids or channels are not evident along the scribed zone. There is substantially no debris generated on the top or bottom surfaces since laser ablation at the surfaces can be avoided by confining the laser filament solely within the bulk glass. On the other hand, simple changes to the laser exposure or sample focusing conditions can move the filament to the surface and thus induce laser ablation machining if desired, as described further below. This assists in creating very sharp V groves on the surface of the substrate. To scribe very thin substrates (less than 400 um thick) creating a sharp V groove is desired. Other common ablation techniques generally create U grooves or rounded V grooves. V grooves also can form on both top and bottom surface of the sample making scribed edges chamfered.
Laser energy deposited along such filaments leads to internal material modification that can be in the form of defects, color centers, stress, microchannels, microvoids, and/or microcracks. The present method entails lateral translation of the focused laser beam to form an array of closely positioned filament-induced modification tracks. This filament array defines a pseudo-continuous curtain of modification inside the transparent medium without generating laser ablation damage at either of the top or bottom surfaces. This curtain renders the glass plate highly susceptible to cleaving when only very slight pressure (force) is applied, or may spontaneously cleave under internal stress. The cleaved facets are devoid of ablation debris, show minimal or no microcracks and microvents, and accurately follow the flexible curvilinear or straight path marked internally by the laser with only very small kerf width as defined by the self-focused beam waist.
The application of high repetition rate bursts of short-pulse lasers offers the advantage of heat accumulation and other transient effects such that thermal transport and other related mechanisms are not fully relaxed prior to the arrival of subsequent laser pulses [U.S. Pat. No. 6,552,301 B2 Burst-UF laser Machining]. In this way, heat accumulation, for example, can present a thin heated sheath of ductile glass to subsequent laser pulses that prevents the seeding of microcracks while also retaining the advantages (i.e. nonlinear absorption, reduced collateral damage) of short pulse ablative machining in an otherwise brittle material. In all the above laser ablation methods, the cutting, scribing, or dicing of transparent materials will generate ablation debris contamination and consume a kerf width to accommodate the removed material, while also generating collateral laser damage. Therefore, a non-ablative method of laser processing would be desirable.
The application of high repetition rate short-pulse lasers thus offers a means for dramatically increasing the processing (scan) speed for such filamentation cleaving. However, at sufficiently high repetition rate (transition around 100 MHz to 1 MHz), the modification dynamics of the filament is dramatically enhanced through a combination of transient effects involving one or more of heat accumulation, plasma dynamics, temporary and permanent defects, color centers, stresses, and material defects that accumulate and do not relax fully during the train of pulses to modify the sequential pulse-to-pulse interactions. Laser filaments formed by such burst trains offer significant advantage in lowering the energy threshold for filament formation, increasing the filament length to hundreds of microns or several millimeters, thermally annealing of the filament modification zone to minimize collateral damage, improving process reproducibility, and increasing the processing speed compared with the use of low repetition rate lasers. In one non-limiting manifestation at such high repetition rate, there is insufficient time (i.e. 10 nsec to 1 μs) between laser pulses for thermal diffusion to remove the absorbed laser energy, and heat thereby accumulates locally with each laser pulse. In this way, the temperature in the interaction volume rises during subsequent laser pulses, leading to laser interactions with more efficient heating and less thermal cycling. In this domain, brittle materials become more ductile to mitigate crack formation. Other transient effects include temporary defects and plasma that survive from previous laser pulse interactions. These transient effects then serve to extend the filamentation process to long interaction lengths, and/or improve absorption of laser energy in subsequent pulses.
As shown below, the laser filamentation method can be tuned by various methods to generate multi-filament tracks broken with non-filamenting zones through repeated cycles of Kerr-lens focusing and plasma defocusing. Such multi-level tracks can be formed in a thick transparent sample, across several layers of glasses separated by transparent gas or other transparent materials, or in multiple layers of different transparent materials. By controlling the laser exposure to only form filaments in the solid transparent layers, one can avoid ablation and debris generation on each of the surfaces in the single or multi-layer plates. This offers significant advantages in manufacturing, for example, where thick glasses or delicate multilayer transparent plates must be cleaved with smooth and crack free facets.
The filamentation method applies to a wide range of materials that are transparent to the incident laser beam, including glasses, crystals, selected ceramics, polymers, liquid-encapsulated devices, multi-layer materials or devices, and assemblies of composite materials. In the present disclosure, it is further to be understood that the spectral range of the incident laser beam is not limited to the visible spectrum, but represents any material that is transparent to a laser wavelength also in the vacuum ultraviolet, ultraviolet, visible, near-infrared, or infrared spectra. For example, silicon is transparent to 1500 nm light but opaque to visible light. Thus, laser filaments may be formed in silicon with short pulse laser light generated at this 1500 nm wavelength either directly (i.e. Erbium-doped glass lasers) or by nonlinear mixing (i.e. optical parametric amplification) in crystals or other nonlinear medium.
In substrates that are transparent within the visible spectrum, the laser filament may result in the generation of white light, which without being limited by theory, is believed to be generated by self phase modulation in the substrate and observed to emerge for the laser filamentation zone in a wide cone angle 16 after the filament ends due to factors such reduced laser pulse energy or plasma defocusing.
The length and position of the filament is readily controlled by the lens focusing position, the numerical aperture of objective lens, the laser pulse energy, wavelength, duration and repetition rate, the number of laser pulses applied to form each filament track, and the optical and thermo-physical properties of the transparent medium. Collectively, these exposure conditions can be manipulated to create sufficiently long and strong filaments to nearly extend over the full thickness of the sample and end without breaking into the top or bottom surfaces. In this way, surface ablation and debris can be avoided at both surfaces and only the interior of the transparent substrate is thus modified. With appropriate beam focusing, the laser filament can terminate and cause the laser beam to exit the glass bottom surface at high divergence angle 16 such that laser machining or damage is avoided at the bottom surface of the transparent plate.
In one embodiment, the method is employed for the scribing and cleaving of optical display glass substrates such as flat panel displays. A flat panel display is the sandwich of two glasses substrates. The bottom glass substrate may be printed with circuits, pixels, connectors, and/or transistors, among other electrical elements. A gap between the substrates is filled with liquid crystal materials. The top and left edge of the LCD can be scribed without any offset but the right and bottom edge typically has an offset of about 5 mm which is call the pad area, and all electronics connected through this region to the LCD elements.
This area is the source of a major bottleneck that limits using high power lasers for flat panel display laser scribing, because during top layer scribing, all the circuitry on the bottom layer may be damaged. To simulate a flat panel device, the inventors placed a top glass substrate on the surface of a coated mirror. During laser filament scribing of the top glass of a double glass plate, it is preferably to adjust the location of filaments formed within the top glass plate so as to avoid damage on the bottom layer that generally contains a metal coating (as described above). The results from this experiment highlighted two important points. Firstly, laser scribing can be achieved without damaging the coating of the bottom substrate pad area, and secondly, when filaments located in a special position closer to the bottom surface, reflection from the bottom metal surface may machine or process the bottom surface of the top layer, creating a V groove on the bottom.
Further investigation results in the method illustrated in
For some applications where a clean or shiny facet is required, the arrangement of
A schematic arrangement for two different focusing conditions for laser filamentation writing is shown that confines the array 38 of modification tracks 40 solely in a top transparent substrate 42 (
One advantage of this one-sided processing is that the assembly of transparent plates does not need to be flipped over to access the second plate 48 due to the transparency of the first plate to the converging laser beam 50. For example, by position the 12 lens closer to the top glass plate 42 in the second pass (
However, during propagation in this region, self focusing persists and results in the creation of a second filament 44 that is confined solely in the bottom layer transparent plate 48. As such, a single laser beam simultaneously forms two or more separated filaments 38 and 44 that create parallel modification tracks 40 and 46 in two or more stacked plates at the same time. In this way, an assembly of two or more transparent plates can by scribed or separated along the near-parallel filamentation tracks and through all transparent plates in one cleaving step. The medium between the transparent plates must have good transparency and may consist of air, gas vacuum, liquid, solid or combination thereof. Alternatively, the transparent plates may be in physical or near-physical contact without any spacing. This method is extensible to filament processing in multiply stacked transparent plates.
In the context of flat panel displays, it is to be noted that providing a V groove on the top surface of the bottom layer requires the machining of extra connections in the pad area. Furthermore, due to shadow effect of connections, filaments don't form in all places. Nonetheless, the substrate may be cleaved with relative easy without perfect facet view. In some cases, edges may be improved by grinding.
New approaches in photonics industry involve assemblies of multiple layers of transparent plates that form a stack. For example, touch screen LCDs and 3D LCDs employ three layers of glass. The parallel processing of such a multi-layer stack 80 is shown in
The following examples are presented to enable those skilled in the art to understand and to practice the present disclosure. They should not be considered as a limitation on the scope of the embodiments provided herein, but merely as being illustrative and representative thereof.
To demonstrate selected embodiments, a glass plate was laser processed using a pulsed laser system with an effective wavelength of about 800 nm, producing 100 fs pulses at a repetition rate of 38 MHz. The laser wavelength was selected to be within the infrared spectral region, where the glass plate is transparent. Focusing optics were selected to provide a beam focus of approximately 10 μm. Initially, the laser system was configured to apply a pulse train of 8 pulses, where the burst of pulses forming the pulse train occurred at a repetition rate of 500 Hz. Various configurations of aforementioned embodiments were employed, as described further below.
The geometric focus of the laser beam in the sample was varied by the lens-to-sample displacement to illustrate the control over the formation of the filaments within the sample. In
While the spacing of the filament tracks in
Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that suitable values for the array spacing and filament depth will depend on the material type and size of a given plate. For example, two plates of equal thickness but different material composition may have different suitable values for the array spacing and filament depth. Selection of suitable values for a given plate material and thickness may be achieved by varying the array spacing and filament depth to obtain a desired cleave quality and required cleave force.
Referring again to
The width of the filamentation modification zone was observed to be about 10 μm when the microscope was focused internally within the glass. This width exceeds the 3-μm modification diameter seen in
The filamentation modification zone maintains a near constant 10 μm width through its full depth range of hundred's of microns in the present glass sample that clearly demonstrates the self-focusing phenomenon. Thus, the filamentation modification presents a 10 μm ‘internal’ kerf width or heat affected zone for such processing. However, the absence of damage or physical changes at the surface indicate that a much smaller or near-zero kerf width is practically available at the surface where one typically only finds other components mounted (paint, electronics, electrodes, packaging, electro-optics, MEMS, sensors, actuators, microfluidics, etc.). Hence, a near-zero kerf width at the surface of transparent substrates or wafers is a significant processing advantage to avoid damage or modification to such components during laser processing. This is one of the important properties of the present disclosure for laser filamentation scribing as the physical modification may be confined inside the bulk transparent medium and away from sensitive components or coatings.
To facility cleaving, laser exposure conditions as presented for
The optical morphology shows smooth cleavage surfaces interdispersed with rippled structures having feature sizes of tens of microns that are generally smooth and absent of cracks. The smooth facet regions correspond to regions where little or no filamentation tracks were observable in views such as shown in
The laser filamentation and scribing examples presented in
Without intending to be limited by theory, the relaxation of material modification dynamics are believed to lead to much weaker overall laser-material interaction in creating filaments and inducing internal modification within the present glass substrate. As a consequence, non-burst laser interactions take place in a very small volume that is near the top glass surface as shown in
For direct comparison with burst-train filament writing,
Accordingly, these results illustrate that the nature of the filament can be readily manipulated by varying the pulsed nature of the laser exposure. In other words, in addition to the parameters of energy, wavelength, and beam focusing conditions (i.e. numerical aperture, focal position in sample), pulse parameters can be tailored to obtain a desired filament profile. In particular, number of pulses in a pulse burst and the delay time between successive pulses can be varied to control the form of the filaments produced. As noted above, in one embodiment, filaments are produced by providing a burst of pulses for generating each filament, where each burst comprises a series of pulses provided with a relative delay that is less than the timescale for the relaxation of all the material modification dynamics.
In the industrial application of single sheet glass scribing, flat panel glass scribing, silicon and/or sapphire wafer scribing, there is a demand for higher scribing speeds using laser systems with proven reliability. To demonstrate such an embodiment, experiments were performed using a high repetition rate commercial ultrafast laser system having a pulse duration in the picosecond range.
As shown in
In a subsequent experiment, the focusing condition was changed to minimize the filament length. For some applications, filament formation is not desired, and/or a clean facet is desirable. A side view showing three different V grooves is provided in
It is to be noted that for each of the optical microscope images in
The present method of low and high (burst) repetition rate filamentation was found to be effective in glass for pulse durations tested in the range of about 30 fs to 10 ps. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the preferably pulse duration range for other materials may be different. Those skilled in the art may determine a suitable pulse duration for other materials by varying the pulse duration and examining the characteristics of the filaments produced.
Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believe that embodiments as disclosed herein utilize self-focusing to generate filaments (plasma channels) in transparent materials. Therefore, laser pulse durations in the range of 1 femtosecond to 100 ps are considered the practical operating domain of the present disclosure for generating appropriately high intensity to drive Kerr-lens self focusing in most transparent media.
The present disclosure also anticipates the formation of thermal gradients in the transparent substrate through non-uniform heating by the focused short duration laser light. Such effects may be enhanced by heat accumulation effects when burst-trains of pulses are applied. In this domain, thermal lensing serves as an alternate means for generating a filament or long-focusing channel to produce filament modification tracks in transparent materials for scribing application.
The filamentation modification of transparent media enables rapid and low-damage singulation, dicing, scribing, cleaving, cutting, and facet treatment of transparent materials that are typically in the form of a flat or curved plate, and thus serve in numerous manufacturing applications. The method generally applies to any transparent medium in which a filament may form. For glass materials, this includes dicing or cleaving of liquid crystal display (LCD), flat panel display (FPD), organic display (OLED), glass plates, multilayer thin glass plates, autoglass, tubing, windows, biochips, optical sensors, planar lightwave circuits, optical fibers, drinking glass ware, and art work. For crystals such as silicon, III-V, and other semiconductor materials, particularly, those in thin wafer form, applications include singulation of microelectronic chips, memory chips, sensor chips, light emitting diodes (LED), laser diodes (LD), vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) and other optoelectronic devices. This filament process will also apply to dicing, cutting, drilling or scribing of transparent ceramics, polymers, transparent conductors (i.e. ITO), wide bandgap glasses and crystals (such as crystal quartz, diamond, sapphire). The applications also extend to all composite materials and assemblies were at least one material component is transparent to the laser wavelength to facilitate such filamentation processing. Examples include silica on silicon, silicon on glass, metal-coated glass panel display, printed circuit boards, microelectronic chips, optical circuits, multi-layer FPD or LCD, biochips, sensors, actuators, MEMs, micro Total Analysis Systems (μTAS), and multi-layered polymer packaging.
The specific embodiments described above have been shown by way of example, and it should be understood that these embodiments may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be further understood that the claims are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but rather to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/640,140, filed Jan. 31, 2013. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/640,140, filed Jan. 31, 2013 is the National Stage Entry of PCT/CA2011/050427, filed Jul. 12, 2011, which claims priority from Provisional Application 61/372,967, filed Aug. 12, 2010, and which claims priority from Provisional Application 61/363,568, filed Jul. 12, 2010. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/640,140, filed Jan. 31, 2013 is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6407360 | Choo et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6552301 | Herman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6787732 | Xuan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6992026 | Fukuyo et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7033519 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7211184 | Webster et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7303977 | Voronov et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
8842358 | Bareman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852698 | Fukumitsu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20010009250 | Herman | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020125232 | Choo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030006221 | Hong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050000952 | Harter | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060011593 | Fukuyo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060213883 | Eberhardt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227398 | Lawrence et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070111481 | Tamura et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070207594 | Tamura | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070272555 | Baird | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070298529 | Maeda | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080217311 | Eberhardt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242056 | Sercel et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090014425 | Zuehlke et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090097514 | Shah | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151996 | Mishima et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090294422 | Lubatschowski | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100025387 | Arai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047587 | Itoh | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100177794 | Arai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100246611 | Sun | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252540 | Lei et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100301027 | Sercel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110132885 | Sercel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110182306 | Hosseini et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110266264 | Rumsby | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120234807 | Sercel et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140079570 | Schweitzer et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140199519 | Schillinger et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213040 | Morikazu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140340730 | Bergh et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150166393 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166394 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150360991 | Grundmueller et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150367442 | Bovatsek et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160009586 | Bookbinder et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160031745 | Ortner et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160059359 | Krueger et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160060156 | Krueger et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2907757 | Sep 2014 | CA |
102785031 | Apr 2015 | CN |
2065120 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2781296 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2754524 | Nov 2015 | EP |
11-207479 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2006-239718 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007238438 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008-62263 | Mar 2008 | JP |
WO 2008035770 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008-98465 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-100284 | May 2008 | JP |
2009-23215 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-50892 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009-56482 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009072829 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009-538233 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-82645 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010160734 | Jul 2010 | JP |
4692717 | Mar 2011 | JP |
5089735 | Sep 2012 | JP |
5271092 | May 2013 | JP |
10-0876502 | Dec 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0073167 | Jul 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0015948 | Feb 2010 | KR |
2008035770 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008126742 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009103313 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009114375 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2014075995 | May 2014 | WO |
2014079570 | May 2014 | WO |
2014111385 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014111794 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014121261 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014161535 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015075059 | May 2015 | WO |
2015094994 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015095264 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2016007843 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016010949 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016079063 | May 2016 | WO |
2016079275 | May 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bhuyan et al., “High aspect ratio taper-free microchannel fabrication using femtosecond Bessel beams”, Optics Express, vol. 18, No. 2, Jan. 18, 2010, pp. 566-574. |
Strigin et al., “Laser processing of glass by picosecond pulses”, Quantum Electronics, vol. 24, No. 8, Aug. 1994, pp. 732-735. |
Nguyen, N. T. et al., “Optical breakdown versus filamentation in fused silica by use of femtosecond infrared laser pulses”, Opt. Lett. 28(17), 1591 (2003). |
Saliminia., A, “Densification of silica glass induced by 0.8 and 1.5⋅ μm intense femtosecond laser pulses”, J. App. Plys. 99, 093104-1 (2006). |
Ahmed, F. et al., “Display glass cutting by femtosecond laser induced single shot periodic void array”, Appl. Phys. A 93: 189-192, (2008). |
Chin, S., “The physics and the challenge of the propagation of powerful femtosecond laser pulses in optical media”, La Physique Au Canada, 60(5), 273 (2004). |
Yoshino et al. Micromachining with a High Repetition Rate Femtosecond Fiber Laser. Journal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering. 2008. vol. 3. No. 3. |
PCT International Search Report. PCT/CA2011/05427. dated Nov. 22, 2011. |
Extended European Search Report (includes Supplementary European Search Report and European Search Opinion) received for European Patent Application No. 11806190.2, dated Mar. 23, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/CA2011/050427, dated Nov. 23, 2012, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/640,140, dated Jul. 17, 2015, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-518917, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 4 pages (1 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Official Copy). |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7002677, dated Aug. 7, 2017, 22 pages (16 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Official Copy). |
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-066485, dated Mar. 23, 2018, 20 pages (12 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Official Copy). |
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-066485, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 12 pages (7 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Official Copy). |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2018-7031438, dated Jan. 7, 2019, 14 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Official Copy). |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7002677, dated Aug. 2, 2018, 6 pages (3 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Official Copy). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170028505 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61363568 | Jul 2010 | US | |
61372967 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13640140 | US | |
Child | 15083088 | US |