The manufacture of integrated circuits involves the transfer of geometric shapes on a mask to the surface of a semiconductor wafer. Thereafter the semiconductor wafer corresponding to the geometric shapes or corresponding to the areas between the geometric shapes is etched away. The transfer of the shapes from the mask to the semiconductor wafer typically involves a lithographic process. This includes applying a photosensitive pre-polymer solution to the semiconductor wafer. The solvent in the pre-polymer solution is removed by evaporation, and the resulting polymer film is then baked. The film is exposed to radiation, for example ultraviolet light, through a photomask supporting the desired geometric patterns. The images in the photosensitive material are then developed by soaking the wafer in a developing solution. The exposed or unexposed areas are removed in the developing process, depending on the nature of the photosensitive material. Thereafter the wafer is placed in an etching solution which etches away the areas not protected by the photosensitive material. Due to their resistance to the etching process, the photosensitive materials are also known as photoresists. These may for instance be sensitive to ultraviolet light, electron beams, x-rays, or ion beams.
The high cost of the photoresist pre-polymer solutions makes it desirable to devise methods of improving the efficiency of the coating process so as to minimize the polymer solution's consumption. Furthermore, thickness uniformity of the photoresist layer is an important criterion in the manufacture of integrated circuits. It ensures satisfactory reproduction of the geometric patterns on the semiconductor wafer.
The solvent in the photoresist tends to evaporate during application, increasing the viscosity of the polymer solution and inhibiting the leveling of the resulting film. This produces thickness non-uniformities. It is therefore desirable to be able to control the rate of evaporation of solvent from the polymer solution.
Environmental humidity is one of the factors affecting the thickness of the photoresist layer. Typically photoresist coating uniformity of the order of 15 to 20 angstroms within a wafer and 20 to 25 angstroms from one wafer to the next and from batch to batch and from day to day is required. This is less than the effect of a 1% difference in relative humidity. Furthermore, in commonly used positive photoresists employing photosensitive diazoquinone compounds, some water content is required to react with products of the photolytic reaction to form required water-soluble carboxylic acids.
It is an object of the invention to provide a method of and an apparatus for improving the thickness uniformity of a polymer solution applied to a surface of a substrate such as a semiconductor wafer.
It is a further object of the invention to improve the consumption of polymer solutions such as photoresist pre-polymer solutions used in the coating of substrates.
According to the invention there is provided a method of coating a surface of a substrate with a polymer solution which includes mounting the substrate inside an enclosed housing, passing a control gas into the housing through an inlet, depositing the polymer solution onto the surface of the substrate in the housing, spinning the substrate, and exhausting the control gas and any solvent vapour and particulate contaminants suspended in the control gas from the housing through an outlet.
The control gas can be a solvent vapour-bearing gas or a solvent-free gas.
The step of exhausting the control gas and any solvent vapour and contaminants can be performed before, during, or after the deposition step.
The solvent vapor-bearing gas is typically produced by bubbling a gas through a solvent and can include the step of controlling the solvent vapor concentration of the solvent vapor-bearing gas by controlling the temperature of the solvent. The solvent vapor concentration of the solvent vapor-bearing gas can also be controlled by controlling the temperature of the housing or by mixing the solvent vapor-bearing gas with a second gas having a different solvent vapor concentration.
The solvent vapor-bearing gas typically comprises air or an inert gas such as nitrogen.
The control gas can be passed into the housing through a showerhead dispenser located directly above the substrate to ensure continuous, controlled, laminar gas flow over the wafer.
The polymer solution can contain a photoresist polymer, for example, a deep-ultraviolet photoresist polymer.
The method can include the step of passing temperature controlled solvent-free, dry, filtered gas over the coated substrate. The method can also include the step of passing solvent-free, humid gas over the coated substrate; the humidity of the humid gas can be controlled to have the relative humidity required by the polymer solution. The relative humidity lies typically in the range of 40% to 45%. The temperature of the humid gas can also be controlled by means of a temperature and humidity controller.
The step of mounting the substrate in the housing can include securing the substrate to a rotatable chuck, for example, by establishing a vacuum between the substrate and the chuck.
The substrate typically comprises a semiconductor wafer and the solute content in the polymer solution is typically 10% to 50% by weight.
Further, according to the invention there is provided a coating apparatus for coating a surface of a substrate with a polymer solution which includes an enclosed housing, a rotatable chuck mounted in the housing for supporting the substrate, a depositing means for depositing the polymer solution onto the surface of the substrate in the housing, a control gas supply means connected in flow communication with the housing for supplying a control gas to the housing, and an exhaust means connected to the housing for exhausting the control gas and any solvent vapour and particulate contaminants from the housing.
The depositing means can include a dispensing head means mounted above the chuck for dispensing a stream of the polymer solution onto the surface of the substrate, the dispensing head means being moveable relative to the substrate. If the substrate has a substantially circular shape, the dispensing head means is typically moveable substantially radially across the surface of the substrate. The depositing means can instead comprise a film extruding means having an extrusion head mounted above the chuck for dispensing a stream of the polymer solution onto the surface of the substrate. In this case, if the substrate is substantially circular in shape, the extrusion head is typically mounted above the chuck for dispensing a radially extending stream of the polymer solution onto the surface of the substrate.
The rotatable chuck can support the substrate thereon, and is typically connected to a variable speed motor. The coating apparatus can include a controlling means for controlling the speed of the variable speed motor in order to rotate the rotatable chuck and substrate at variable speeds.
The housing can have an upstream side and a downstream side; the solvent vapor-bearing gas supply means can include an inlet to the housing mounted at the upstream side of the housing, and the exhaust means can include an outlet mounted at the downstream side of the housing. The control gas supply means can include conduits connected in flow communication with the housing, and electrically-controlled valves in at least one of the conduits for controlling the rate of control gas flowing into the housing and the composition of the control gas. The exhaust means can also include a valve means for controlling the exhaustion of the gas and any contaminants from the housing. The solvent vapor-bearing gas supply means can include a clean, dry, filtered gas source and a bubbler connected in flow communication with the housing.
The coating apparatus can, further, include a temperature and humidity controlled gas source connected in flow communication with the housing. The temperature and humidity controlled gas source can include a temperature control means and humidity control means for controlling the temperature and humidity of the gas supplied by the temperature and humidity controlled gas source.
a shows film thickness as a function of solvent flow rate at a fixed spin speed.
b shows film thickness as a function of solvent flow time.
This invention pertains to a method of improving the thickness uniformity of coatings formed when depositing solutions on substrates. It pertains further to a method of reducing the wastage of such solutions. In particular, the method will be described with reference to semiconductor wafers used in the manufacture of integrated circuits and the application of photoresist pre-polymer solutions to a surface of a semiconductor wafer. It will be appreciated that films or coatings used in integrated circuit manufacture are not limited to photoresist layers and could, for example, include materials such as organic planarization films, anti-reflection films, siloxane spin-on-glass films, polyimide films, and polyimide siloxane films.
As mentioned above the solute content in these materials prior to the coating process typically ranges from 10% to 50% by weight.
As will become clearer from the discussion which follows below it is desirable to conduct the coating process of the semiconductor wafer in a housing or chamber which allows the atmosphere in the chamber to be at least partially saturated with solvent molecules. This has the advantage of improving the cast film wetability by establishing a monolayer coating of solvent on the surfaces of the substrate. Furthermore by controlling the concentration of solvent in the gas within the chamber, thickness uniformity of the polymer solution film on the substrate can be improved. This will be the case whether spin-cast films, spray-coated films or any other similar coating method is adopted.
In a spin-cast method, a solution is applied to the substrate while the substrate is either stationary, moving linearly, or rotating. Thereafter the substrate is spun to spread the solution over the surface of the substrate. After the solution has spread over the substrate surface, the solvent in the solution is removed by evaporation leaving a layer of solute on the surface of the substrate. As substrate sizes are increased or when attempts are made to reduce costs by minimizing the amount of fluid applied to the surface of the substrate, a non-uniform thickness in the solute layer on the substrate typically results. This is, in part, a result of the difference in tangential velocity between the periphery and the center of the substrate. The non-uniform air flow along the periphery causes non-uniform evaporation of solvent, thereby producing coating thickness non-uniformities. Since the larger substrates require higher spin speeds to obtain uniformity near the center, spirals and striations result near the periphery of the substrate due to non-uniform interaction with the air in contact with the solution near the periphery. These features are known as Ekman spirals.
Problems are also encountered when insufficient coating solution is used. When attempts are made to reduce costs by minimizing the amount of the coating solution applied to the surface of the substrate during spin-casting, non-uniformities are created due to the low solvent volume. Evaporation of the solvent during the coating process results in various defects and irregularities. Similarly, in spray-coated films, solvent tends to evaporate during the application, thus increasing viscosity and inhibiting the levelling of the resulting film, again resulting in thickness non-uniformities.
As mentioned above, certain photoresists require some water content to react with products of the photolytic reaction. For these reasons, it is desirable to be able to control the humidity of the air in the chamber.
The invention will now be described in greater detail with respect to embodiments making use of a spin-coating process. In these embodiments the substrate is a semiconductor wafer and the solution applied to the semiconductor wafer is a photoresist pre-polymer solution.
The arrangement 10 further includes a dispensing head 42 for dripping a solution (in this case a photoresist pre-polymer solution) onto a wafer 44 mounted on the chuck 12.
The bottom of the housing 14 defines an annular channel 46 having an exhaust 48 for gas such as air or nitrogen, and a drain 50 for liquid.
In a typical process the semiconductor wafer 44 is secured to the chuck 12 using any standard method such as a vacuum established between the chuck 12 and the wafer 44. A wafer transport door 52 to the housing 14 is thereafter closed. The housing 14 is purged with dry solvent-free gas. Control gas is then fed into the housing. The solvent concentration of the control gas can be controlled before, during and after the coating solution is dispensed onto the substrate. By manipulating the valves 38 and 40, the solvent is passed along the conduit 36 through the valve 40, along the conduit 24, and into the housing 14. A controlled partial pressure of solvent can be achieved by bubbling the gas, comprising nitrogen or air, through the bubbler 30. The bubbler 30 in this embodiment includes a porous glass frit from which the gas is passed through the liquid solvent 34 which is maintained at an appropriate set temperature. The resultant solvent-bearing gas, containing the appropriate concentration of solvent, is passed over the semiconductor wafer prior to and during the coating process. Clearly the solvent tank 32 must contain or be supplied with sufficient solvent to allow the desired solvent concentration in the solvent-bearing gas to be maintained.
In order to deposit a layer of photoresist onto the wafer 44, the polymer solution is applied across the surface of the wafer 44 via the dispensing head 42. This is achieved by dispensing the polymer solution in a continuous stream from a nozzle 54 onto the wafer 44 while the wafer 44 is spinning at relatively low speed or while it is stationary. In the preferred embodiment, the nozzle 54 is moved substantially radially across the wafer 44. Instead, the solution can be dispensed at the center of the substrate, or multiple nozzles can be used. By adjusting the spin speed of the wafer 44, the movement of the nozzle 52 and the rate at which the polymer solution is dispensed, a suitable distribution of the solution can be achieved. In another embodiment, as illustrated in
Since the extruder process is otherwise identical to the
As discussed above the temperatures of the liquid solvent or gas supplied to the bubbler 30 is adjustable. In this way the partial pressure of solvent in the solvent-bearing gas can be adjusted. This can be achieved by making use of heating/cooling coils as described above. Instead the concentration can be adjusted by adding a gas bearing a different solvent concentration. This could be supplied via a conduit (not shown) connected to the conduit 36. Clearly if the temperatures of the bubbler and the housing 14 are the same, the solvent-bearing gas will be saturated with solvent. If the temperature of the bubbler is higher, the solvent-bearing gas in the housing 14 will be super saturated, and if the temperature of the bubbler is lower, the solvent-bearing gas in the housing 14 will be unsaturated. Typically the solvent-bearing gas supplied by the bubbler 30, and the housing 14 will be kept at the same temperature to maintain solvent saturation. As mentioned above, the arrangement 10 is typically mounted in an outer housing (not shown). The outer housing is temperature controlled to maintain it and the components of the arrangement 10 at a temperature of typically 22° C.
Usually the solvent contained in the bubbler and borne by the gas will be the same as that contained in the solution deposited on the wafer. Similarly, if the solution contains more than one solvent, the bubbler may contain similar solvents in the same ratios. However it may be desirable in certain circumstances to use different solvents in the bubbler as compared to the solvents in the solution deposited on the wafer.
It will be appreciated that a solvent-bearing gas can be produced using techniques other than a bubbler.
Solvent vapor pressure can be determined precisely by using an isoteniscope. Alternatively, by passing inert gas through a sample of the solution and measuring the amount of solvent removed as a function of time gravimetrically, the vapor pressure can be determined precisely. The solvent partial pressure in the gas supplied by the conduit 36 can be adjusted, optimally to correspond to the equilibrium vapor pressure created by the solvent in the polymer solution. This ensures that the rate at which solvent evaporates from the deposited film or coating is equal to the rate at which the solvent is absorbed by the film from the gaseous environment.
As mentioned above the solvent partial pressure in the housing 14 can be adjusted by controlling the temperature of the bubbler or gas. Alternatively, a gas containing a different solvent concentration can be mixed with the solvent-saturated gas. The optimum profile of solvent partial pressure in the housing atmosphere as a function of time during the coating process can be determined empirically.
By continuously exhausting the solvent-bearing gas or humid air via the exhaust 48, humidity and solvent partial pressure in the housing can readily be adjusted during the coating process to ensure a uniform solution layer thickness on the semiconductor wafer surface. Similarly the effects of premature evaporation of solvent from the polymer solution deposited on the wafer 44 can be eliminated. This allows less polymer solution to be used, thereby reducing costs.
A coating apparatus according to the invention and sized appropriately for 200 mm diameter wafers was assembled and installed in a wafer track machine. In-situ air pressure, air temperature, relative humidity and solvent concentration measurements were performed during the wafer processing. Ethyl lactate was used as the casting solvent for the photoresist. Solvent concentration within the process chamber was varied between 0-40% of the saturated value.
a and 3b demonstrate results obtained by practicing a method according to the invention. As shown in
Taken together, the above results indicate that there is reduced dependency of the film profiles on the evaporation-related process variables when practicing the invention. This is a direct result of suppression of evaporation during the critical phases of the spin coating and indicate that practicing the invention resolves two major problems associated with 300 mm substrates.
While particular embodiments provide the advantages, above, the invention is clearly not limited to those embodiments. The conduit 28 could, for instance, be connected directly to the conduit 36. In this way the gas supplied by the temperature and humidity controlled source could also supply the bubbler 30. The humidity of the temperature and humidity controlled source would simply be reduced to zero while supplying the bubbler 30. When dry or moist gas is to be supplied to the housing 14, a valve in the conduit 28 could be closed to insure that no solvent is sucked up the conduit 28.
It should be noted that when certain advanced deep ultra-violet photoresist materials are used, a moisture-free casting environment can be used. Accordingly the humidity of the temperature and humidity controlled gas will be kept at zero.
It will further be appreciated that the invention is not limited in its application to a spin coating arrangement but applies equally to arrangements making use of other solution deposition techniques.
This application claims the benefit of provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/185,818 filed Feb. 29, 2000. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/391,964 filed Sep. 8, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,238,735) which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/876,273 filed Jun. 16, 1997 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,954,878) which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/566,227 filed Dec. 1, 1995 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,210) which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/330,045 filed Oct. 27, 1994 (now abandoned), all applications of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3198657 | Kimball et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
4068019 | Boeckl | Jan 1978 | A |
4113492 | Sato et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4132357 | Blackinton | Jan 1979 | A |
4267212 | Sakawaki | May 1981 | A |
4347302 | Gotman | Aug 1982 | A |
4393807 | Fujimura et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4438159 | Weber | Mar 1984 | A |
4451507 | Beltz et al. | May 1984 | A |
4510176 | Cuthbert et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4514440 | Justice et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4518678 | Allen | May 1985 | A |
4551355 | Ericson et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4600597 | White et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4732785 | Brewer | Mar 1988 | A |
4741926 | White et al. | May 1988 | A |
4800836 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4822639 | Fujii et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4886012 | Ikeno et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4932353 | Kawata et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946710 | Miller et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4963390 | Lipeles et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5013586 | Cavazza | May 1991 | A |
5066616 | Gordon | Nov 1991 | A |
5094884 | Hillman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5095848 | Ikeno | Mar 1992 | A |
5127362 | Iwatsu et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134962 | Amada et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5135608 | Okutani | Aug 1992 | A |
5143552 | Moriyama | Sep 1992 | A |
5158860 | Gulla et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5180431 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5198034 | DeBoer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234499 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5238713 | Sago et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5264246 | Ikeno | Nov 1993 | A |
5271955 | Maniar | Dec 1993 | A |
5318800 | Gong et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5358740 | Bornside et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366757 | Lin | Nov 1994 | A |
5378511 | Cardinali et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391393 | Maniar | Feb 1995 | A |
5395803 | Adams | Mar 1995 | A |
5449405 | Cardinali et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5472502 | Batchelder | Dec 1995 | A |
5532192 | Adams | Jul 1996 | A |
5670210 | Mandal et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5762709 | Sugimoto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5954878 | Mandal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5985363 | Shiau et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027760 | Gurer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6191053 | Chun et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6238735 | Mandal et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248168 | Takeshita et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6317642 | You et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6387825 | You et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6407009 | You et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6468951 | Grieger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20010017103 | Takeshita et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010033895 | Minami et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020127334 | Gurer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150691 | Kitano et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
279033 | May 1990 | DE |
46-10790 | Mar 1971 | JP |
46-42658 | Dec 1971 | JP |
57-45369 | Mar 1982 | JP |
57-130432 | Aug 1982 | JP |
60-10248 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60-226125 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61-29125 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-76119 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61-206224 | Sep 1986 | JP |
62-92316 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62-225269 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-85626 | Apr 1988 | JP |
63-119531 | May 1988 | JP |
63-301520 | Dec 1988 | JP |
64-27667 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1-238017 | Sep 1989 | JP |
2-98126 | Apr 1990 | JP |
02-98126 | Apr 1990 | JP |
2-119226 | May 1990 | JP |
3-22428 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3-41715 | Feb 1991 | JP |
3-175617 | Jul 1991 | JP |
4-9823 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4-62915 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-104158 | Apr 1992 | JP |
4-332116 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-166712 | Jul 1993 | JP |
6-170316 | Jun 1994 | JP |
8-168715 | Jul 1996 | JP |
WO 9857757 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020004100 A1 | Jan 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60185818 | Feb 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08566277 | Dec 1995 | US |
Child | 08876273 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09391964 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 09795924 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08876273 | Jun 1997 | US |
Child | 09391964 | US | |
Parent | 08330045 | Oct 1994 | US |
Child | 08566277 | US |