The present invention relates generally to methods for doping a Si surface, and more particularly to methods for doping a Si surface by treating the substrate with a dopant solution and subsequently diffusing the dopant into the surface by rapid thermal annealing.
Decreasing device size has been the main driving force for technology advancements in the semiconductor industry over the last several decades. For example, in front end of line (FEOL) applications in semiconductor processing, junction depths have been scaled continuously together with the gate lengths in order to achieve faster transistor speeds and higher packing densities. Typically, source/drain extension junction depths of about one third of the transistor gate length have been used for efficient electrostatics and acceptable leakage currents. With gate lengths fast approaching the sub-10 nm regimes, development work is focused on reliably making sub-5 nm ultrashallow junctions (USJs) with low sheet resistivity to facilitate the future scaling of transistors.
Most commonly, USJs are commercially fabricated by the combination of ion implantation and spike annealing. During the process, Si atoms are displaced by energetic dopant ions and a subsequent annealing step (e.g. spike, a high temperature anneal process of less than 1 s with fast temperature ramp up/down capability) is used to activate the dopants by moving them into the appropriate lattice positions and restoring the substrate's crystal quality. Unfortunately, point defects such as Si interstitials and vacancies are also generated, which interact with the dopants to further broaden the junction profile—called transient-enhanced diffusion (TED), which limits the formation for sub-10 nm USJs by conventional technologies.
Significant research efforts have been made to develop new strategies to manufacture <5 nm USJs which utilize heavier implantation dopant sources (molecular implantation, gas cluster ion beam, and plasma doping) to obtain shallower doping profiles, and advanced annealing techniques (flash and laser) to activate the implanted dopants without causing significant diffusion. However, problems relating to the effects of advanced doping and annealing techniques on junction uniformity, reliability and subsequent process integration continue to hamper their use in IC manufacturing.
One potential route for achieving the USJs, while maintaining controlled doping of semiconductor materials with atomic accuracy, at such small scales, takes advantage of the crystalline nature of silicon and its rich, self-limiting surface reaction properties. This method relies on the formation of self-assembled monolayers of dopant-containing molecules on the surface of crystalline Si followed by the subsequent thermal diffusion of dopant atoms via rapid thermal annealing (RTA).
Ground-breaking work in this area has been performed by Professor Ali Javey at Berkeley (Nature Materials, vol. 7, January 2008, pp 62-67; Nanoletters, 2009 Vol. 9, No 2, pp 725-730). Dr. Javey and his group successfully doped silicon wafers by treating the Si surfaces with a dopant dissolved in mesitylene (the dopant being allylboronic acid pinacol ester for p-doped wafers, and diethyl-1-propylphosphonate for n-doped wafers), and subsequently annealing the material to diffuse the dopant atoms into the surface and achieve the n+/p USJs. Dr. Javey's results were confirmed by SIMS, and penetration depth for P-containing mixtures were observed to be ˜3-3.5 nm.
Problems remain to be solved with the Javey process though. For example, the mesitylene-containing treatment solutions used by Dr. Javey are not appropriate for commercial applications where high surface modification reaction temperatures are employed and commercial-scale material handling considerations are important. Accordingly, a need remains for improvements to Dr. Javey's method for doping silicon substrates. The present invention addresses that need.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method for doping a Si surface comprising treating the substrate with a diluted dopant solution comprising tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (tetraglyme) and a dopant-containing material and subsequently diffusing the dopant into the surface. Dithyl-1-propylphosphonate and allylboronic acid pinacol ester are preferred dopant-containing materials, and are preferably included in the diluted dopant solution in an amount ranging from about 1% to about 20%, with a dopant amount of 4% or less being more preferred. A capping layer is preferably applied prior to diffusion, such as by depositing silicon oxide or silicon nitride. A diffusion step is preferably accomplished by rapid thermal annealing.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to certain embodiments and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications of the illustrated embodiments being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
In one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for doping a Si surface by treating the substrate with a diluted dopant solution comprising tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (tetraglyme) and a dopant-containing material and subsequently diffusing the dopant into the surface.
In the preferred embodiments the Si surface is initially cleaned to remove oxides and provide an H-terminated silicon surface. The initial cleaning may be accomplished using dilute HF, for example. Additional steps may also be employed to protect the surface until the tetraglyme-dopant treatment, such as treating the surface with 3-methyl-3-methoxybutanol.
In one preferred aspect of the present invention tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (tetraglyme) is used as a solvent to provide a dopant-containing material to the cleaned Si substrate. The solvent interacts with the dopant molecules, carrying them to the silicon surface and thereby allows control of the amount of dopant that is applied to the surface.
The tetraglyme is preferably included in an amount appropriate to dilute the dopant material to an amount less than 20% and preferably no more than 4%. If no additional solvents are used the amount of tetraglyme may be 80% or more, and preferably 96% or more. If additional solvents are used the amount of tetraglyme may be correspondingly less.
In another embodiment the solvent system comprises a solvent instead of or in addition to tetraglyme. Preferred additional or alternative solvents have individual flash points above 120° C., or provide a solvent system having a combined flash point above 120° C. Preferred additional or alternative solvents also have a contact angle of 0° when applied to a Si surface, and are miscible with water. In other embodiments the additional or alternative solvent has those characteristics and is a polar solvent.
The secondary solvent that may replace or be used in addition to tetraglyme may include one or more of the following: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylsulfone, N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), 1 formyl piperidine, other gycol ethers such as triglyme or diglyme, isopar solvent blends such as Isopar M, alkanolamines such as ethanolamine, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, fatty acids such as linoleic acid, oleic acid, palmitoleic acid, and mixtures of fatty acids in such solvents as safflower oil, grape seed oil, poppyseed oil, sunflower oil, hemp oil, corn oil, wheat germ oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil, walnut oil, sesame oil, rice bran oil, pistachio oil, peanut oil, canola oil, chicken fat, egg yolk, linseed oil, lard, olive oil, palm oil, cocoa butter, macadamia oil, butter, and coconut oil.
As to the dopant, diethyl-1-propylphosphonate and allylboronic acid pinacol ester are preferred dopant-containing materials. In some embodiments other dopants effective for producing n-doped or p-doped surfaces may be used in addition to or instead of diethyl-1-propylphosphonate and/or allylboronic acid pinacol ester. For example, arsenic or another Group V material may be used in addition to or in place of phosphorus, and galium or another Group III material may be used in addition to or in place of boron.
In other embodiments the dopant comprises 5-5 Dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinan-2-one. In another embodiment the dopant comprises triphenylphosphate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises trimethylphosphite. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl ethylphosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises dimethyl methylphosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl (2-oxobutyl) phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl (hydroxymethyl)phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises dimethyl (3-phenoxyacetonyl)phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises bis(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine. In another embodiment the dopant comprises bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl 1-phenylethyl phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl 2-phenylethyl phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl cyclopropylmethyl phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises dimethyl (3-phenoxyacetonyl)phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises diethyl (2-methylallyl)phosphonate. In another embodiment the dopant comprises one or more members selected from the group consisting of 5-5 Dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinan-2-one, triphenylphosphate, trimethylphosphite, diethyl ethylphosphonate, dimethyl methylphosphonate, diethyl (2-oxobutyl) phosphonate, diethyl (hydroxymethyl)phosphonate, dimethyl (3-phenoxyacetonyl)phosphonate, bis(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine, bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine, diethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate, diethyl 1-phenylethyl phosphonate, diethyl 2-phenylethyl phosphonate, diethyl cyclopropylmethyl phosphonate, dimethyl (3-phenoxyacetonyl)phosphonate, diethyl (2-methylallyl)phosphonate, and Diethyl-1-propyl phosphonate.
The dopant material is preferably included in the diluted dopant solution in an amount ranging from about 1% to about 20%, with a dopant amount of 1% to 10% being more preferred, and a doping amount of 4% or less being most preferred in testing to date.
A capping layer is preferably applied prior to diffusion, such as by depositing silicon oxide or silicon nitride. In one embodiment a 50 nm thick capping layer is applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) prior to diffusion.
The dopant material is diffused into the Si surface by annealing after the deposition of a capping layer. Preferably, rapid thermal annealing (RTA) is used.
Reference will now be made to specific examples using the processes described above. It is to be understood that the examples are provided to more completely describe preferred embodiments, and that no limitation to the scope of the invention is intended thereby.
A variety of solvents were evaluated as potential replacements for mesitylene in allylboronic acid pinacol ester:mesitylene and diethylpropyl-phosphonate:mesitylene systems. The candidate solvents included: 1) Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO); 2) N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP); 3) 1-formyl piperidine (1-FP); 4) tetraglyme, (TG); and 5) Isopar M (IM).
Solubility was tested with diethyl 1-propylphoshonate 97% (n-type dopant) and allylboronic acid pinacol ester (p-type dopant). Solvent to additive ratio (n or p type) material is 1:4. Solubility results are provided below:
All of the materials were soluble and stayed in solution. They were checked after 12 hours, having been maintained at room temperature.
Contact angle testing was also conducted. Silicon substrates (n-doped and p-doped prior to testing) were submerged in 0.5% HF(aq) for 2 minutes at room temperature (23° C.) before testing contact angles. DI water and mesitylene were used as references.
The observed contact angles on Si (100) n-type and p-type are reported below:
The contact angle testing indicated that all of the tested solvents other than DMSO have no contact angle and therefore wet the surface of the substrate. Given the contact angle measurement for DMSO, it was excluded from further testing.
Diluted dopant solutions were used to dope a Si substrate. The following glassware was used for the doping testing: 3 neck round bottom flask (500 mL), 2 distilling columns, stainless steel tube for N2 inlet, 2 thermometer adaptors, Y distillation adaptor, 4 tubes for columns and N2, circulation bath, thermometer, heating mantel.
The following materials were used: N2 (ultra high purity), Ethylene Glycol/water mixture (1:1), experimental solution (solutions used are listed below), 3-methyoxy-3-methylbutanol, 0.5% HF solution, IPA, n-type Si substrate, p-type Si substrate.
The test procedure was as follows:
SIMS is an analytical technique that detects very low concentrations of dopants and impurities. It can provide elemental depth profiles over a depth range from a few angstroms to tens of microns. SIMS works by sputtering the sample surface with a beam of primary ions. Secondary ions formed during the sputtering are extracted and analyzed using a mass spectrometer. These secondary ions can range from matrix levels down to sub-parts-per-million trace levels. This technique was used to determine if phosphorus atoms (from diethyl 1-propylphosphonate) or boron atoms (from allylboronic acid pinacol ester) penetrated into the silicon substrate after the capping and high temperature annealing processes. Results are shown in
In the above example, one sample was created using mesitylene as the solvent, and one was prepared using tetraglyme (TG) as the solvent. The samples were compared using SIMS to generate data for the comparison. The system using tetraglyme as the solvent provided phosphorus to the surface and, after capping and annealing, allowed the phosphorus to penetrate the Si deeper than the phosphorus provided to the silicon surface by the mesitylene solvent system.
Additional SIMS results after multiple loadings of diethyl 1-propylphoshonate in the solution are provided in
The results for the phosphorus doped samples indicate that doping depth can be controlled by one or a combination of factors such as doping concentration, time, and temperature.
The doped surfaces of the present invention may be produced by the following process:
1. Clean and dry a patterned Si wafer, preferably using DHF solution;
2. Clean immersion tank;
3. Rinse cleaned tank with tetraglyme or doping solution multiple times until all the solution that was used for cleaning is purged;
4. Fill tank with doping solution to a level great enough to completely cover the wafers to be doped;
5. Heat the doping solution to the temperature required to create a layer of dopant on the silicon;
6. Completely immerse the wafers in the doping solution for time required to create a layer of dopant on the silicon;
7. Rinse wafers with appropriate solvent (for example, IPA or H2O); and
8. Dry the wafers with N2.
Subsequent to the above, the doped surfaces may be treated as follows:
1. Oxide deposition; and
2. Annealing to promote dopant diffusion.
Appropriate process steps for capping the doped surface (oxide deposition) and for annealing to promote dopant diffusion may be accomplished using methods known to persons skilled to the art.
While the compositions and methods of the present invention have been described by reference to certain preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and methods described herein without departing from the concept and spirit of the invention. All such modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are desired to be protected, and are deemed to be within the scope of the invention as herein disclosed and claimed.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/042,541 filed Mar. 8, 2011, and claims the priority benefit of the provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/311,516 filed Mar. 8, 2010 which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3562038 | Shipley et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3673099 | Corby et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
4787997 | Saito et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5304284 | Jagannathan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308745 | Schwartzkopf | May 1994 | A |
5417877 | Ward | May 1995 | A |
5419779 | Ward | May 1995 | A |
5422309 | Zettler et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5468423 | Garabedian, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5597678 | Honda et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5612304 | Honda et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648324 | Honda et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5795702 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798323 | Honda et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5840622 | Miles et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5928430 | Ward et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6033996 | Rath et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6200891 | Jagannathan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6276372 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319835 | Sahbari et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6372410 | Ikemoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6455479 | Sahbari | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465403 | Skee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482656 | Lopatin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6531436 | Sahbari et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6579668 | Baik et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6638694 | Ikemoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6777380 | Small et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6825156 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846748 | Chien et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6872663 | Okada | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6878500 | Rutter, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6916772 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7049275 | Ikemoto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064087 | Turner et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7144848 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7528098 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7543592 | Lee | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579308 | Lee | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7632796 | Phenis et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20010014534 | Aoki et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020037819 | Sahbari | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020128164 | Hara et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152925 | Soutar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030130149 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181344 | Ikemoto et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186175 | Ikemoto et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194636 | Wanat et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030228990 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040038840 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048761 | Ikemoto et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040081922 | Ikemoto et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040134873 | Yao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147420 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040256358 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016961 | Toda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050090416 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050176259 | Yokoi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202987 | Small et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050263743 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003910 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014656 | Egbe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046446 | Kon et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073997 | Leonte et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094613 | Lee | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099831 | Borovik et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060138399 | Itano et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070099805 | Phenis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111912 | Phenis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149430 | Egbe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070243773 | Phenis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080011714 | Yokoi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080070404 | Beck et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076688 | Barnes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080261847 | Visintin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090186793 | Phenis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100056409 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100104824 | Phenis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112728 | Korzenski et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 678 571 | Oct 1995 | EP |
1 562 225 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 736 534 | Dec 2006 | EP |
62-188785 | Aug 1987 | JP |
07-28254 | Jan 1995 | JP |
1 807 077 | Apr 1993 | RU |
WO 03 083920 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ho et al., Wafer-Scale, Sub-5 nm Junction Formation by Monolayer Doping and Conventional Spike Annealing, Nano Letters, 2009, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 725-730, entire document, especially: p. 726, col. 1, para. 2. |
Ho et al., Controlled Nanoscale Doping of Semiconductors via Molecular Monolayers, Nature Materials, vol. 7, Jan. 2008, pp. 62-67, entire document. |
“Resorcinol CAS# 108-46-3”, IS Chemical Technology, 2010. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report dated Jun. 5, 2008 for corresponding PCT/US2006/041394. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report dated Feb. 21, 2008 for corresponding PCT/US2007/066128. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2009 for corresponding PCT/US2008/071485. |
Written opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 12, 2009 for corresponding PCT/US2008/071485. |
Written opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 21, 2008 for corresponding PCT/US2007/066128. |
Written opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 25, 2009 for corresponding PCT/US2009/048409. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2009 for corresponding PCT/US2009/048409. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 60/953,804, filed Aug. 3, 2007. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 61/075,195, filed Jun. 24, 2008. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 61/557,229, filed Nov. 8, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,912. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 28, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,912. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,826. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,826. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 19, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,828. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,754. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,470. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,654. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,654. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 17, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,828. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 30, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,754. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 23, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,470. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 25, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,826. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 1, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,826. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,912, filed Oct. 28, 2005. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/551,826, filed Oct. 23, 2006. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/091,808, filed Oct. 24, 2006. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,828, filed Dec. 15, 2009. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,754, filed Oct. 30, 2007. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,470, filed Feb. 1, 2010. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,654, filed Jun. 24, 2009. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,541, filed Mar. 8, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130059433 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61311516 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13042541 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13645539 | US |