1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention relate to methods and systems for making a microelectromechanical system that involve supplying an etchant to etch one or more sacrificial structures.
2. Description of the Related Art
Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) include micro mechanical elements, actuators, and electronics. Micromechanical elements may be created using deposition, etching, and/or other micromachining processes that etch away parts of substrates and/or deposited material layers or that add layers to form electrical and electromechanical devices. One type of MEMS device is called an interferometric modulator. As used herein, the term interferometric modulator or interferometric light modulator refers to a device that selectively absorbs and/or reflects light using the principles of optical interference. In certain embodiments, an interferometric modulator may comprise a pair of conductive plates, one or both of which may be transparent and/or reflective in whole or part and capable of relative motion upon application of an appropriate electrical signal. In a particular embodiment, one plate may comprise a stationary layer deposited on a substrate and the other plate may comprise a metallic membrane separated from the stationary layer by an air gap. As described herein in more detail, the position of one plate in relation to another can change the optical interference of light incident on the interferometric modulator. Such devices have a wide range of applications, and it would be beneficial in the art to utilize and/or modify the characteristics of these types of devices so that their features can be exploited in improving existing products and creating new products that have not yet been developed.
In some embodiments, a method for making a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device is provides. The method may include providing a chamber and an unreleased MEMS device situated therein, the unreleased MEMS device including a sacrificial structure. The method may include supplying an etchant to the chamber to thereby etch the sacrificial structure. The method may include monitoring a process parameter related to the pressure within the chamber as a function of time to thereby provide an indication of the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure. The monitored process parameter may be the change in pressure within the chamber as a function of time. The monitored process parameter may be a change in a time derivative of a within-cycle pressure across cycles. The monitored process parameter may include the temperature within the chamber and/or the change in temperature within the chamber as a function of time. The method may further include discontinuing the supplying of the etchant to the chamber and/or removing at least a portion of the gases from the chamber. In some embodiments, the method includes conducting one or more additional cycles by repeating at least supplying an etchant to the chamber to thereby etch the sacrificial structure, monitoring a process parameter related to the pressure within the chamber as a function of time to thereby provide an indication of the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure and removing at least a portion of the gases from the chamber. An initiation of an additional cycle may be discontinued upon the providing of the indication. The indication may be provided when the monitored process parameter corresponding to a specific time relative to the beginning of an additional cycle crosses a pre-selected threshold and/or when the monitored process parameter corresponding to a specific time relative to the beginning of an additional cycle crosses a pre-selected second threshold after having already crossed a pre-selected first threshold. A monitored process parameter measured at a specific time relative to the beginning of the first or additional cycle may be compared to a monitored process parameter measured at the same specific time relative to the beginning of a different additional cycle to thereby provide the indication. The indication may be provided when the monitored process parameter crosses a pre-selected threshold.
The pre-selected threshold may be about zero. The pre-selected threshold may be about 1%, about 5% or about 10% of a maximum process parameter relative to an initial process parameter. The pre-selected threshold may be about 105% of a first pressure expected if the etchant does not react with another substance. The pre-selected threshold may be a pressure change of about 0.2 mT per second or about −0.2 mT per second.
The unreleased MEMS device may include an unreleased interferometric modulator. The unreleased MEMS device may include a substrate. The unreleased MEMS device may include one or more first layers positioned over the substrate. The unreleased MEMS device may include a sacrificial layer including a sacrificial structure positioned over the one or more first layers. The unreleased MEMS device may include one or more second layers positioned over the sacrificial layer. The one or more first layers may include a first electrode. The one or more second layers may include a second electrode. A reaction between the etchant and the sacrificial structure may produce primarily gaseous products. The sacrificial structure may include molybdenum. The etchant may include xenon difluoride. A method described herein may further include positioning one or more additional unreleased MEMS devices in the chamber, the additional unreleased MEMS devices including additional one or more sacrificial structures. A MEMS device may be manufactured by a method described herein.
In some embodiments, an etching system is provided. The etching system may include an etching chamber configured to provide an etchant to the chamber and to house an unreleased MEMS device including a sacrificial structure. The etching system may include a parameter monitor configured to monitor a parameter related to the pressure within the chamber. The etching system may include a component configured to indicate the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on changes in the parameter as a function of time. The parameter may be the pressure within the chamber. The parameter may be the change in a time derivative of a within-cycle pressure across cycles. The etching chamber may be configured to provide the etchant to the chamber in a plurality of cycles. The component may be further configured to compare the changes in the parameter across the cycles. The component may be configured to determine when a change in the parameter as a function of time crosses a pre-selected threshold and/or to indicate when to discontinue the providing of the etchant. The component may be configured to compare the change in the parameter as a function of time at a particular time relative to the cycle onset across cycles and/or to identify a cycle in which the change in the parameter as a function of time crosses a threshold. The component may be configured to identify a cycle in which the change in the parameter as a function of time crosses a threshold. The component may include a computer.
In some embodiments, a computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions thereon for determining a stop etching time is provided. The instructions may include receiving a plurality of input parameters related to the pressure within an etching chamber housing an unreleased MEMS device including a sacrificial structure. Each of the input parameters may correspond to an etching cycle and/or a time relative to the onset of the etching cycle. The instructions may include determining pressure-derivative parameters, which may be determined by calculating the change of the input parameter with respect to the time relative to the onset of the etching cycle. The instructions may include outputting an indicator of the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure by comparing at least one pressure-derivative parameter corresponding to a specified time relative to the onset of the corresponding etching cycle to a threshold, and the instructions may further include determining a cycle in which one of the at least one pressure-derivative parameter is below the threshold and in which the corresponding pressure-derivative parameter from the preceding trial is above the threshold. The indicator may include a time in which an amount of etching has been or is expected to be achieved. The amount may correspond to etching of approximately all of the sacrificial structure. The threshold may be approximately zero.
In some embodiments, an optical device formation system is provided. The optical device formation system may include means for providing an etchant to interact with a sacrificial structure of an unreleased MEMS device, wherein the means for providing the etchant to interact with the sacrificial structure of the unreleased MEMS device may include an etching chamber. The optical device formation system may include means for monitoring a parameter related to pressure changes at least partially attributable to the interaction of the etchant with the sacrificial structure, wherein the means for monitoring the parameter related to pressure changes at least partially attributable to the interaction of the etchant with the sacrificial structure may include a pressure sensor. The optical device formation system may include means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter, wherein the means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter may include a computer. The means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter may include means for indicating a time in which a specific amount of etching of the sacrificial structure has been achieved. The means for indicating a time may include a computer. The specific amount may be approximately all of the sacrificial structure. The time may include an etching cycle. The means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter may include means for determining an etching cycle for which a change in the monitored parameter with respect to time fall below a specified threshold. The means for determining an etching cycle may include a computer. The threshold may be approximately zero.
These and other embodiments are described in greater detail below.
The following detailed description is directed to certain specific embodiments of the invention. However, the invention can be embodied in a multitude of different ways. In this description, reference is made to the drawings wherein like parts are designated with like numerals throughout. As will be apparent from the following description, the embodiments may be implemented in any device that is configured to display an image, whether in motion (e.g., video) or stationary (e.g., still image), and whether textual or pictorial. More particularly, it is contemplated that the embodiments may be implemented in or associated with a variety of electronic devices such as, but not limited to, mobile telephones, wireless devices, personal data assistants (PDAs), hand-held or portable computers, GPS receivers/navigators, cameras, MP3 players, camcorders, game consoles, wrist watches, clocks, calculators, television monitors, flat panel displays, computer monitors, auto displays (e.g., odometer display, etc.), cockpit controls and/or displays, display of camera views (e.g., display of a rear view camera in a vehicle), electronic photographs, electronic billboards or signs, projectors, architectural structures, packaging, and aesthetic structures (e.g., display of images on a piece of jewelry). MEMS devices of similar structure to those described herein can also be used in non-display applications such as in electronic switching devices.
Sacrificial structures may be formed during the manufacturing of a MEMS device. The sacrificial structures may later be removed to form, for example, a cavity. During the manufacturing process, a device that contains a sacrificial structure may be positioned in a chamber. An etchant can be introduced to the chamber in order to react with the sacrificial structure to form gaseous products. These gaseous products may be removed from the chamber and etchant may again be supplied to the chamber. This cycle may be repeated until the sacrificial structure is removed. In embodiments of this invention, a process parameter related to the pressure within the chamber is monitored as a function of time to thereby provide an indication of the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure. In some embodiments, the indication results in the discontinuation of the supply of etchant to the chamber.
One interferometric modulator display embodiment comprising an interferometric MEMS display element is illustrated in
The depicted portion of the pixel array in
The optical stacks 16a and 16b (collectively referred to as optical stack 16), as referenced herein, typically comprise several fused layers, which can include an electrode layer, such as indium tin oxide (ITO), a partially reflective layer, such as chromium, and a transparent dielectric. The optical stack 16 is thus electrically conductive, partially transparent, and partially reflective, and may be fabricated, for example, by depositing one or more of the above layers onto a transparent substrate 20. The partially reflective layer can be formed from a variety of materials that are partially reflective such as various metals, semiconductors, and dielectrics. The partially reflective layer can be formed of one or more layers of materials, and each of the layers can be formed of a single material or a combination of materials.
In some embodiments, the layers of the optical stack 16 are patterned into parallel strips, and may form row electrodes in a display device as described further below. The movable reflective layers 14a, 14b may be formed as a series of parallel strips of a deposited metal layer or layers (orthogonal to the row electrodes of 16a, 16b) deposited on top of posts 18 and an intervening sacrificial material deposited between the posts 18. When the sacrificial material is etched away, the movable reflective layers 14a, 14b are separated from the optical stacks 16a, 16b by a defined gap 19. A highly conductive and reflective material such as aluminum and/or silver may be used for the reflective layers 14, and these strips may form column electrodes in a display device.
With no applied voltage, the gap 19 remains between the movable reflective layer 14a and optical stack 16a, with the movable reflective layer 14a in a mechanically relaxed state, as illustrated by the pixel 12a in
In one embodiment, the processor 21 is also configured to communicate with an array driver 22. In one embodiment, the array driver 22 includes a row driver circuit 24 and a column driver circuit 26 that provide signals to a display array or panel 30. The cross section of the array illustrated in
In typical applications, a display frame may be created by asserting the set of column electrodes in accordance with the desired set of actuated pixels in the first row. A row pulse is then applied to the row 1 electrode, actuating the pixels corresponding to the asserted column lines. The asserted set of column electrodes is then changed to correspond to the desired set of actuated pixels in the second row. A pulse is then applied to the row 2 electrode, actuating the appropriate pixels in row 2 in accordance with the asserted column electrodes. The row 1 pixels are unaffected by the row 2 pulse, and remain in the state they were set to during the row 1 pulse. This may be repeated for the entire series of rows in a sequential fashion to produce the frame. Generally, the frames are refreshed and/or updated with new display data by continually repeating this process at some desired number of frames per second. A wide variety of protocols for driving row and column electrodes of pixel arrays to produce display frames are also well known and may be used in conjunction with the present invention.
In the
The display device 40 includes a housing 41, a display 30, an antenna 43, a speaker 45, an input device 48, and a microphone 46. The housing 41 is generally formed from any of a variety of manufacturing processes as are well known to those of skill in the art, including injection molding and vacuum forming. In addition, the housing 41 may be made from any of a variety of materials, including, but not limited to, plastic, metal, glass, rubber, and ceramic, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the housing 41 includes removable portions (not shown) that may be interchanged with other removable portions of different color, or containing different logos, pictures, or symbols.
The display 30 of exemplary display device 40 may be any of a variety of displays, including a bi-stable display, as described herein. In other embodiments, the display 30 includes a flat-panel display, such as plasma, EL, OLED, STN LCD, or TFT LCD as described above, or a non-flat-panel display, such as a CRT or other tube device, as is well known to those of skill in the art. However, for purposes of describing the present embodiment, the display 30 includes an interferometric modulator display, as described herein.
The components of one embodiment of exemplary display device 40 are schematically illustrated in
The network interface 27 includes the antenna 43 and the transceiver 47 so that the exemplary display device 40 can communicate with one or more devices over a network. In one embodiment, the network interface 27 may also have some processing capabilities to relieve requirements of the processor 21. The antenna 43 is any antenna known to those of skill in the art for transmitting and receiving signals. In one embodiment, the antenna transmits and receives RF signals according to the IEEE 802.11 standard, including IEEE 802.11(a), (b), or (g). In another embodiment, the antenna transmits and receives RF signals according to the BLUETOOTH standard. In the case of a cellular telephone, the antenna is designed to receive CDMA, GSM, AMPS, or other known signals that are used to communicate within a wireless cell phone network. The transceiver 47 pre-processes the signals received from the antenna 43 so that they may be received by and further manipulated by the processor 21. The transceiver 47 also processes signals received from the processor 21 so that they may be transmitted from the exemplary display device 40 via the antenna 43.
In an alternative embodiment, the transceiver 47 can be replaced by a receiver. In yet another alternative embodiment, network interface 27 can be replaced by an image source, which can store or generate image data to be sent to the processor 21. For example, the image source can be a memory device such as a digital video disc (DVD) or a hard-disc drive that contains image data, or a software module that generates image data.
Processor 21 generally controls the overall operation of the exemplary display device 40. The processor 21 receives data, such as compressed image data from the network interface 27 or an image source, and processes the data into raw image data or into a format that is readily processed into raw image data. The processor 21 then sends the processed data to the driver controller 29 or to frame buffer 28 for storage. Raw data typically refers to the information that identifies the image characteristics at each location within an image. For example, such image characteristics can include color, saturation, and gray-scale level.
In one embodiment, the processor 21 includes a microcontroller, CPU, or logic unit to control operation of the exemplary display device 40. Conditioning hardware 52 generally includes amplifiers and filters for transmitting signals to the speaker 45, and for receiving signals from the microphone 46. Conditioning hardware 52 may be discrete components within the exemplary display device 40, or may be incorporated within the processor 21 or other components.
The driver controller 29 takes the raw image data generated by the processor 21 either directly from the processor 21 or from the frame buffer 28 and reformats the raw image data appropriately for high speed transmission to the array driver 22. Specifically, the driver controller 29 reformats the raw image data into a data flow having a raster-like format, such that it has a time order suitable for scanning across the display array 30. Then the driver controller 29 sends the formatted information to the array driver 22. Although a driver controller 29, such as a LCD controller, is often associated with the system processor 21 as a stand-alone Integrated Circuit (IC), such controllers may be implemented in many ways. They may be embedded in the processor 21 as hardware, embedded in the processor 21 as software, or fully integrated in hardware with the array driver 22.
Typically, the array driver 22 receives the formatted information from the driver controller 29 and reformats the video data into a parallel set of waveforms that are applied many times per second to the hundreds and sometimes thousands of leads coming from the display's x-y matrix of pixels.
In one embodiment, the driver controller 29, array driver 22, and display array 30 are appropriate for any of the types of displays described herein. For example, in one embodiment, driver controller 29 is a conventional display controller or a bi-stable display controller (e.g., an interferometric modulator controller). In another embodiment, array driver 22 is a conventional driver or a bi-stable display driver (e.g., an interferometric modulator display). In one embodiment, a driver controller 29 is integrated with the array driver 22. Such an embodiment is common in highly integrated systems such as cellular phones, watches, and other small area displays. In yet another embodiment, display array 30 is a typical display array or a bi-stable display array (e.g., a display including an array of interferometric modulators).
The input device 48 allows a user to control the operation of the exemplary display device 40. In one embodiment, input device 48 includes a keypad, such as a QWERTY keyboard or a telephone keypad, a button, a switch, a touch-sensitive screen, or a pressure- or heat-sensitive membrane. In one embodiment, the microphone 46 is an input device for the exemplary display device 40. When the microphone 46 is used to input data to the device, voice commands may be provided by a user for controlling operations of the exemplary display device 40.
Power supply 50 can include a variety of energy storage devices as are well known in the art. For example, in one embodiment, power supply 50 is a rechargeable battery, such as a nickel-cadmium battery or a lithium ion battery. In another embodiment, power supply 50 is a renewable energy source, a capacitor, or a solar cell including a plastic solar cell, and solar-cell paint. In another embodiment, power supply 50 is configured to receive power from a wall outlet.
In some embodiments, control programmability resides, as described above, in a driver controller which can be located in several places in the electronic display system. In some embodiments, control programmability resides in the array driver 22. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the above-described optimizations may be implemented in any number of hardware and/or software components and in various configurations.
The details of the structure of interferometric modulators that operate in accordance with the principles set forth above may vary widely. For example,
In embodiments such as those shown in
The process 800 illustrated in
The process 800 illustrated in
The process 800 illustrated in
The process 800 illustrated in
As noted above with respect to step 825 of the process 800, the sacrificial structure of an interferometric modulator can be removed by supplying an etchant to a chamber in which the unreleased interferometric modulator is situated. The etchant can then react with the sacrificial structure to form gaseous products. For example, a xenon difluoride gaseous etchant can react with a molybdenum sacrificial structure to form the gaseous products of molybdenum hexafluoride and xenon. It can be advantageous to monitor the extent of etching. Under-etching may interfere with the functioning of the device. For example, under-etching may reduce the cavity depth of an interferometric modulator, which could affect the wavelength of light reflected from the device. Over-etching may add additional time and/or expense to the manufacturing process. Still, monitoring the extent of etching can be difficult. The devices may be small, making it difficult to determine whether etching is complete. Additionally, components of the device may be configured such that it is difficult to view the sacrificial structure as it is being etched.
In some embodiments, methods and/or systems relate to monitoring the extent of etching of a sacrificial structure by an etchant. The etchant may be provided to an etching chamber housing a MEMS device (e.g., an interferometric modulator) in one or more cycles. An indication of the extent of etching may be obtained by monitoring the chamber pressure, or a variable related to the pressure, within a particular cycle and/or across cycles. The pressure increase during mid-stage cycles may be greater during than early stage and/or late-stage cycles. While not wishing to be bound to any particular theory, it is believed that as the etchant reacts with the sacrificial structure, the number of moles of gas and/or the temperature within the chamber increases, resulting in an increase in the pressure within the chamber during the cycle. During early-stage and late-stage cycles, the surface area of the sacrificial structure available for reaction with the etchant may be reduced as compared to mid-stage cycles, e.g., as illustrated in
As described in more detail below, the extent of etching may be determined by monitoring the chamber pressure across cycles and comparing it to two (or more) thresholds. As the surface area of the sacrificial structure increases across early-stage cycles, the pressure may rise above a first threshold. As the surface area of the sacrificial structure reaches a maximum and then begins to decrease during mid-stage and late-stage cycles, the pressure may pass through a corresponding maximum and then fall below a second threshold. The extent of etching may be determined by monitoring the time derivative of the within-cycle pressure and comparing it to the two thresholds. As the surface area of the sacrificial structure increases across cycles, the reaction rate may increase, thereby causing the derivative of the within-cycle pressure to rise above the first threshold. As the surface area of the sacrificial structure decreases as the sacrificial structure is removed, the reaction rate may decrease, thereby causing the derivative of the within-cycle pressure to fall below a second threshold.
The extent of etching may be determined in various ways. For example, the extent of etching may be determined by monitoring a change in the chamber pressure across etching cycles or by monitoring a change in the derivative of the within-cycle pressure across cycles. As the extent of etching nears completion, the number of moles of gas may remain substantially constant throughout each cycle. Thus, the pressure at a post-initial time point of the cycle, which may be substantially equal to the pressure at an initial time point of the cycle, may remain relatively constant across cycles. Additionally, the derivative of the pressure, which may be substantially equal to zero, may remain relatively constant across cycles. Therefore, the change in the absolute pressure across cycles or the change in the derivative of the within-cycle pressure across cycles may approach zero as etching nears completion.
As illustrated in
The process 900 illustrated in
The supplied etchant may react with the sacrificial structure of the MEMS device. In some embodiments, one or more external parameters are held approximately constant during this reaction. For example, after an amount of etchant has been supplied to the chamber 105, inlets 115 and outlets of the chamber 105 may be closed (e.g., using a valve, not shown in
The process 900 illustrated in
3XeF2(g)+Mo(s)→3Xe(g)+MoF6(g)
Thus, in a closed system embodiment, the number of moles of gas in the chamber 105 may increase as the etchant reacts with the sacrificial layer, thereby increasing the pressure, and/or the reaction may produce heat, which may increase chamber pressure in accordance with the relationship PV=nRT where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles of gas, R is a constant and T is temperature. The pressure within the chamber 105 may therefore increase as the reaction progresses.
The process parameter that is monitored at step 915 may comprise the pressure within the chamber 105 or a change (e.g., a time derivative) in the pressure within the chamber during a cycle as a function of time. For example,
The process parameter that is monitored at step 915 may comprise a change in the pressure within the chamber 105 across cycles or a change in a time derivative of the within-cycle pressure across cycles. For example,
The process 900 illustrated in
The gas may be removed by the vacuum pump system 120 of the chamber 105. In some embodiments, the gas is removed from the chamber 105 one time or in a single stage. In other embodiments, the gas is removed at distinct time points or in multiple stages, and in still other embodiments, the gas is continuously removed. The gas may be removed after a pre-selected period of time has elapsed since the start and/or termination of the supply of the etchant to the chamber 105 in step 910 of process 900.
The process 900 illustrated in
In some embodiments, the extent of etching is communicated to an operator, e.g., displayed on a computer display, whereas in others it is not. Indicating the extent of etching may comprise controlling a process step based on the extent of etching. For example, if the extent of etching is above a threshold, the process 900 may continue to repeat a cycle. Repeating a cycle may comprise repeating, for example, at least steps 910, 915 and 920 or at least steps 910, 915, 920 and 925. The process 900 may include the discontinuation of the initiation of a new cycle and/or the discontinuation of the supply of etchant to the chamber 105, which may occur if the extent of etching is not above the threshold. The controlling of a process step may comprise controlling, for example, the flow rate of the etchant supplied to the chamber 105 in step 910 or controlling the time period between the supply of the etchant to the chamber 105 in step 910 and the removing of the gas from the chamber 105 in step 920.
The extent of etching may be determined by analyzing the parameter monitored in step 915 of the process 900. In some embodiments, the extent of etching is determined by comparing a monitored parameter to a threshold. The indication may be provided when the monitored process parameter corresponding to a specific time crosses a pre-selected threshold. For example, the extent of etching may be estimated to be complete when a pressure or change in pressure at a specific time after the etchant is supplied to the chamber 105 is below a specific threshold, e.g., below a pre-selected pressure or pressure change threshold value. The threshold may be pre-determined. For example, if the parameter comprises a change in a variable across cycles and/or a time derivative in a within-cycle variable, the threshold value may be about zero, e.g., a within-cycle and/or across-cycle pressure change of about zero, or may be a pre-selected value, such as a pressure change of about −0.5, −0.2, −0.1, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 mTorr per second. The threshold may be determined in various ways, and may be based on one or more previously-monitored parameter values. For example, a first pressure may be identified as one expected if the etchant does not react with another substance. The threshold may be equal to about 100%, about 105% or about 110% of this first pressure. For example, in
The threshold may be about 1%, about 5% or about 10% of a maximum process parameter or about 1%, about 5% or about 10% of a maximum process parameter compared to another process parameter. For example, the maximum pressure may be determined and compared to an initial pressure, which may be the pressure estimated as that when none of the etchant reacts with the sacrificial structure. In
In some embodiments, etchant is supplied to the chamber 105 in a plurality of cycles at step 910 of the process 900, each of which may represent the start of a cycle. The extent of etching may then be determined by comparing the monitored parameter across cycles. The comparison may include monitored process parameters measured at one or more specific times relative to the beginning of a plurality of cycles. For example, the etching may be approaching completion if a monitored parameter is approximately constant across cycles. For example, for the embodiment illustrated in
In some embodiments, the surface area of a sacrificial structure tends to be relatively large during mid-stage etching cycles. The relatively lower surface area during the initial cycles may limit the rate of the etchant reaction, thereby producing a relatively lower chamber pressure or derivative of the within-cycle pressure. Etching may initially increase the surface area, such that mid-stage cycles are associated with an increased chamber pressure or derivative of the within-cycle pressure. As the sacrificial structure is removed, the surface area may again decrease, causing the chamber pressure or derivative of the within-cycle pressure to again decrease. In some embodiments, the indication of the extent of etching indicates when the monitored parameter crosses a threshold in a particular direction (e.g., when the monitored parameter falls below a selected threshold). For example, in
In instances in which the etchant is supplied in a plurality of cycles, gas may be removed from the chamber 105 in a plurality of cycles at step 920 of the process 900. A period of time, which may be fixed or variable, may elapse between the beginning of a cycle and the removal of gas from the chamber 105. The period of time may be an estimate or an over-estimate of a time period required for all of the supplied etchant to react with the sacrificial structure. In some embodiments, the period of time may be an estimate of a time period required for a threshold amount of the supplied etchant to react with the sacrificial structure.
In some instances, when the etchant is supplied in a plurality of cycles, initially, the sacrificial structure may be characterized by a relatively small surface area. Therefore, the rate of the reaction between the etchant and the sacrificial structure may be relatively slow. The pressure may increase as the reaction progresses. The reaction from the initial cycles may increase the surface area. Therefore, in subsequent cycles, the rate of the reaction and the corresponding rate of pressure changes may increase. However, as the majority of the sacrificial structure is removed, the surface area will again decrease, which may cause the rate of the reaction and the corresponding rate of pressure changes to decrease. Therefore, etching may be approximated to be complete after such changes in pressure are observed.
In instances in which the etchant is supplied in a plurality of cycles, the extent of etching can be determined by estimating the amount of etchant remaining after a time period. For example, initially an etchant may react with a sacrificial structure to form gaseous products such that after some time period no etchant remains in the chamber 105. During later cycles, the sacrificial structure may be entirely removed and the etchant may therefore remain after the same time period. Changes in the etchant concentration may be estimated by using a monitored parameter, such as the monitored parameter related to pressure from step 915. The time period may be a pre-determined time period, a dynamically determined time period, or a time period determined based on previous cycles.
In some embodiments, the process 900 further comprises positioning one or more additional unreleased MEMS devices in the chamber 105, the additional unreleased MEMS devices comprising additional one or more sacrificial structures. In some embodiments, additional etchant is supplied to the chamber 105 to etch the additional one or more sacrificial structures. The indicating of the extent of etching from step 925 from the first MEMS device may be used to at least partially control the supply of additional etchant to the cycles or the initiation of additional cycles.
As shown in
The etch system 100 may comprise a component 135 (e.g., a computer) configured to indicate the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure of the unreleased MEMS device. The component 135 may be operably connected to the parameter monitor 130. The extent of etching may be based on changes in a parameter monitored by the parameter monitor 130 as a function of time. In embodiments in which the etchant is supplied to the chamber 105 in a plurality of cycles, the component 135 may further be configured to compare changes in the parameter across cycles. In some embodiments, the component 135 may be configured to determine when the parameter or a change in the parameter as a function of time crosses a threshold. The threshold may be pre-selected or may be partially or completely determined based on previously monitored parameter values. In some embodiments, the component 135 is configured to determine when the parameter or a change in the parameter as a function of time crosses two thresholds (e.g., rising above a first threshold and subsequently falling below a second threshold). The component 135 may be further configured to indicate the extent of etching. The component 135 may indicate when to discontinue the providing of the etchant or the initiation of a new cycle. The component 135 may be configured to compare the parameter or changes in the parameter as a function of time at a particular time relative to the cycle onset across cycles. The component 135 may be configured to identify a cycle in which a parameter or change in the parameter as a function of time crosses a threshold. The crossing of the threshold may comprise falling below the threshold.
In some embodiments, the component 135 comprises a computer. In some embodiments, the etching system 100 further comprises a display, such as a computer monitor that may visually indicate the extent of etching as determined by the component 135. In some embodiments, the etch system 100 further comprises an input device. The input device may comprise, for example, a keyboard. In an embodiment, the component 135 comprises a computer system that includes a computer monitor and a keyboard. The input device may be configured to receive threshold parameters from the user. The component 135 may be configured to control and/or partially control any process step disclosed herein. For example, the component 135 may be configured to control supplying an etchant to a chamber, monitoring a process parameter, and/or removing at least a portion of the gases from the chamber. A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions thereon may be installed on the component 135. The instructions may be used to control or partially control any and/or all parts of the etch system 100 and/or the process 900.
In some embodiments, a computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions thereon for determining a stop etching time is provided. The computer-readable medium may be installed on the component 135. The instructions may comprise receiving a plurality of input parameters related to the pressure within an etching chamber housing an unreleased MEMS device comprising a sacrificial structure. Each of the input parameters may correspond to an etching cycle and a time relative to the onset of the etching cycle. The input parameters may comprise the pressure within the etching chamber or any other parameter related to the pressure as described herein. The instructions may comprise determining pressure-derivative parameters by calculating the change of the input parameter with respect to the time relative to the onset of the etching cycle. As an example, the pressure-derivative parameters may comprise changes in the pressure or in the temperature within the chamber as function of time. The instructions may comprise outputting an indicator of the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure by comparing at least one input parameter or pressure-derivative parameter corresponding to a specified time relative to the onset of the corresponding etching cycle to a threshold. The threshold may be approximately zero or may be determined by a parameter monitored in a previous trial. The instructions may comprise outputting an indicator of the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure by comparing at least one pressure-derivative parameter corresponding to a specified time relative to the onset of the corresponding etching cycle to at least one other pressure-derivative parameter corresponding to the same specified time relative to the onset of the other corresponding etching cycle. The indicator may comprise a time or an over-estimate of a time in which an amount of etching has been or is expected to be achieved. The amount of etching may correspond to etching of approximately all of the sacrificial structure. The outputting step may further comprise determining a cycle in which one of the at least one input parameter or pressure-derivative parameter is below the threshold and in which the corresponding input parameter or pressure-derivative parameter from the preceding trial is above the threshold.
In some embodiments, an optical device formation system is provided. The system may comprise means for providing an etchant to interact with a sacrificial structure of an unreleased MEMS device, which may comprise an etching chamber. The system may comprise means for monitoring a parameter related to pressure changes at least partially attributable to the interaction of the etchant with the sacrificial structure, which may comprise a pressure sensor. The system may comprise means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter, which may comprise a computer. The means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter may comprise means for indicating a time in which a specific amount of etching of the sacrificial structure has been achieved, which may comprise a computer. The specific amount may be approximately all of the sacrificial structure. The time may comprise an etching cycle. The means for indicating the extent of etching of the sacrificial structure based on the monitored parameter may comprise means for determining an etching cycle for which a change in the monitored parameter with respect to time falls below a specified threshold, and the threshold may be approximately zero. The means for determining an etching cycle may comprise a computer.
An unreleased interferometric modulator is positioned within the etch chamber of an etch system as illustrated in
The pressure within the chamber is monitored at 10-second intervals beginning at the time the etchant is supplied to the chamber, during both the supplying of etchant to the chamber (t=0 to 100 s in
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. As will be recognized, the present invention may be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features may be used or practiced separately from others.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4500171 | Penz et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4519676 | te Velde | May 1985 | A |
4566935 | Hornbeck | Jan 1986 | A |
4710732 | Hornbeck | Dec 1987 | A |
4852516 | Rubin et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4900395 | Syverson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4954789 | Sampsell | Sep 1990 | A |
4956619 | Hornbeck | Sep 1990 | A |
5002631 | Giapis et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5083364 | Olbrich et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083857 | Hornbeck | Jan 1992 | A |
5099353 | Hornbeck | Mar 1992 | A |
5124834 | Cusano et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5216537 | Hornbeck | Jun 1993 | A |
5231532 | Magel et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5293272 | Jannson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5324683 | Fitch et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334250 | Mikami et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345328 | Fritz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5374346 | Bladon et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5454906 | Baker et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5536359 | Kawada et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5583688 | Hornbeck | Dec 1996 | A |
5646768 | Kaeiyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5726480 | Pister | Mar 1998 | A |
5773088 | Bhat | Jun 1998 | A |
5784212 | Hornbeck | Jul 1998 | A |
5785877 | Sato et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5822110 | Dabbaj | Oct 1998 | A |
5825528 | Goossen | Oct 1998 | A |
5835255 | Miles | Nov 1998 | A |
5896796 | Chih | Apr 1999 | A |
5906536 | Imazato et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919548 | Barron et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940684 | Shakuda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5967163 | Pan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986796 | Miles | Nov 1999 | A |
6031653 | Wang | Feb 2000 | A |
6033919 | Gnade et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
6165890 | Kohl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170332 | MacDonald et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204080 | Hwang | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215221 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218056 | Pinarbasi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6288472 | Cabuz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335224 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359673 | Stephenson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377233 | Colgan et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6407851 | Islam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409876 | McQuarrie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6447126 | Hornbeck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448622 | Franke et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6558506 | Freeman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602791 | Ouellet et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6618187 | Pilossof | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635919 | Melendez et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6674090 | Chua et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6696096 | Tsubaki et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713235 | Ide et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720267 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6736987 | Cho | May 2004 | B1 |
6747800 | Lin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6756317 | Sniegowski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778306 | Sniegowski et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782166 | Grote et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806110 | Lester et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812482 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822304 | Honer | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6861277 | Monroe et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870654 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6953702 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6972891 | Patel et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982820 | Tsai | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995890 | Lin | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999225 | Lin | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999236 | Lin | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008812 | Carley | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7012726 | Miles | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027202 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7041224 | Patel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7041571 | Strane | May 2006 | B2 |
7049164 | Bruner | May 2006 | B2 |
7050219 | Kimura | May 2006 | B2 |
7064089 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078293 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7110158 | Miles | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119945 | Cummings et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7172915 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195343 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198973 | Lin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221495 | Miles et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7256107 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7321457 | Heald | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7399710 | Launay | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010003487 | Miles | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020003400 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014579 | Dunfield | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021485 | Pilossof | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027636 | Yamada | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033229 | Lebouitz et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045362 | Yang et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055253 | Rudhard | May 2002 | A1 |
20020086455 | Franosch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110948 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117728 | Brosnihhan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020195423 | Patel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006468 | Ma et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030072070 | Miles | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073302 | Huibers | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030104752 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121609 | Ohmi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030202264 | Weber et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202265 | Reboa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040028849 | Stark et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035821 | Doan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038513 | Kohl et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040053434 | Bruner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080832 | Singh | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124483 | Partridge et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040124495 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136076 | Tayebati | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040188785 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191937 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191946 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197526 | Mehta | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207898 | Lin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209195 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217264 | Wood et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050001274 | Kim et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014374 | Partridge et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020089 | Shi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050045276 | Patel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078348 | Lin | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098840 | Fuertsch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118832 | Korzenski et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050170670 | King et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195462 | Lin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195467 | Kothari et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060066932 | Chui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066935 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067650 | Chui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076311 | Tung et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077502 | Tung et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077529 | Chui et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096705 | Shi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119922 | Faase et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177950 | Lin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186759 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060256420 | Miles et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257070 | Lin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266730 | Doan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020794 | DeBar | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026636 | Gogoi | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042521 | Yama | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070111533 | Korzenski et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070155051 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070170540 | Chung et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070196944 | Chou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206267 | Tung et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249078 | Tung et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249079 | Sasagawa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249081 | Luo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070269748 | Miles | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080026328 | Miles | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029481 | Kothari et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068699 | Miles | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094687 | Heald | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130089 | Miles | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226929 | Chung et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231931 | Londergan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080279498 | Sampsell et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 38 072 | Mar 2000 | DE |
0 035 299 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 578 228 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 747 684 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 788 005 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 878 824 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1 209 738 | May 2002 | EP |
1 452 481 | Sep 2004 | EP |
49-004993 | Jan 1974 | JP |
05275401 | Oct 1993 | JP |
10148644 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2001-085519 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002-0287047 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002-207182 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-243937 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-328313 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-001598 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004-106074 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-133281 | Apr 2004 | JP |
WO 9105284 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9210925 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 0114248 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0163657 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0224570 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2004055885 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004075231 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004079056 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005061378 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2006077390 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080318344 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |