The embodiments disclosed herein relate to various medical device components, including components that can be incorporated into robotic and/or in vivo medical devices. Certain embodiments include various actuation system embodiments, including fluid actuation systems, drive train actuation systems, and motorless actuation systems. Further embodiments include various operational components for medical devices, including medical device arm mechanisms, medical device winch mechanisms, medical device biopsy/stapler/clamp mechanisms, and medical device adjustable focus mechanisms. Other embodiments relate to reversibly lockable tube mechanisms.
Invasive surgical procedures are essential for addressing various medical conditions. When possible, minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopy are preferred.
However, known minimally invasive technologies such as laparoscopy are limited in scope and complexity due in part to 1) mobility restrictions resulting from using rigid tools inserted through access ports, and 2) limited visual feedback. Known robotic systems such as the da Vinci® Surgical System (available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., located in Sunnyvale, Calif.) are also restricted by the access ports, as well as having the additional disadvantages of being very large, very expensive, unavailable in most hospitals, and having limited sensory and mobility capabilities.
There is a need in the art for improved surgical methods, systems, and devices.
One embodiment disclosed herein relates to a biopsy component having a substantially fixed jaw component, a mobile jaw component adjacent to the substantially fixed jaw component, and a sliding component configured to move between a first position and a second position. The mobile jaw component is predisposed to a position in which a distal end of the component is not in contact with the substantially fixed jaw component. Further, the sliding component in the second position is in contact with the mobile jaw component such that the sliding component urges the distal end of the mobile jaw component toward the substantially fixed jaw component.
Another embodiment disclosed herein relates to an arm device having an extendable rotational arm, a first drive component, a second drive component, a first driven component, a second driven component, and a pin. The extendable rotational arm has an exterior portion having a first coupling component and further has a first aperture defined within the arm. The first drive component is coupled with the first driven component, and the first driven component has an inner surface having a second coupling component that is configured to be coupled with the first coupling component. The second drive component is coupled with the second driven component, and the second driven component has a second aperture defined within it. The pin is disposed within the first and second apertures. According to one embodiment, the first and second coupling components are threads. In a further embodiment, the first and second drive components and first and second driven components are gears. Alternatively, the first and second drive components and the first and second driven components are a pulley system or a friction drive system.
Yet another embodiment disclosed herein relates to a medical device having a body, a first winch component and an actuation component. The first winch component has a first drum and a first tether operably coupled to the first drum. In one embodiment, the actuation component is operably coupled to the first drum. In an additional embodiment, the device further has an end effector operably coupled to the distal end of the tether. In yet another implementation, the device also has a second winch component having a second drum and a second tether operably coupled to the second drum. According to a further embodiment, the device also has a third winch component having a third drum and third tether operably coupled to the third drum.
The various systems and devices disclosed herein relate to devices for use in medical procedures and systems. More specifically, the various embodiments relate to various actuation or end effector components or systems that can be used in various procedural devices and systems.
It is understood that the various embodiments of actuation, end effector, and other types of device components disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any known medical devices, including, but not limited to, robotic or in vivo devices as defined herein.
For example, the various embodiments disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices disclosed in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/932,441 (filed on Oct. 31, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), Ser. No. 11/695,944 (filed on Apr. 3, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), Ser. No. 11/947,097 (filed on Nov. 27, 2007 and entitled “Robotic Devices with Agent Delivery Components and Related Methods), Ser. No. 11/932,516 (filed on Oct. 31, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), Ser. No. 11/766,683 (filed on Jun. 21, 2007 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), Ser. No. 11/766,720 (filed on Jun. 21, 2007 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Surgical Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), Ser. No. 11/966,741 (filed on Dec. 28, 2007 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Visualization and Device Manipulation”), 60/949,391 (filed on Jul. 12, 2007), 60/949,390 (filed on Jul. 12, 2007), 60/990,062 (filed on Nov. 26, 2007), 60/990,076 (filed on Nov. 26, 2007), 60/990,086 (filed on Nov. 26, 2007), 60/990,106 (filed on Nov. 26, 2007), 60/990,470 (filed on Nov. 27, 2007), 61/025,346 (filed on Feb. 1, 2008), 61/030,588 (filed on Feb. 22, 2008), and 61/030,617 (filed on Feb. 22, 2008), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In an exemplary embodiment, any of the various embodiments disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgical device, such as a NOTES device. Those skilled in the art will appreciate and understand that various combinations of features are available including the features disclosed herein together with features known in the art.
Certain device implementations disclosed in the applications listed above can be positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including certain devices that can be positioned against or substantially adjacent to an interior cavity wall, and related systems. An “in vivo device” as used herein means any device that can be positioned, operated, or controlled at least in part by a user while being positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including any device that is positioned substantially against or adjacent to a wall of a body cavity of a patient, further including any such device that is internally actuated (having no external source of motive force), and additionally including any device that may be used laparoscopically or endoscopically during a surgical procedure. As used herein, the terms “robot,” and “robotic device” shall refer to any device that can perform a task either automatically or in response to a command.
Certain embodiments disclosed herein relate to actuation components or systems that are configured to provide motive force to any of the various procedural device embodiments described above. One such embodiment is a fluid actuation system.
As further shown in
In one embodiment, the hydraulic fluid used in the hydraulic system 10 is saline solution. Alternatively, the fluid is water-based. In a further alternative, the hydraulic fluid can be any fluid that is non-toxic, biocompatible, and less compressible as required to provide sufficient precise control.
In one implementation, the external hydraulic components 22 are the reservoir 24, pump 26, and accumulator 28 as discussed above, which operate in known fashion to hydraulically power the piston assembly 14. In one example, the pump 26 used in this system is a commercially-available surgical irrigation pump, while the accumulator 28 and reservoir 24 are commercially available from Parker Hannifin, which is located in Cleveland, Ohio. Alternatively, the external hydraulic components 22 can be any known configuration of any hydraulic components capable of hydraulically powering the piston 16.
According to one implementation of a fluid actuation system, the piston 16 is a standard syringe handle and the cylinder 18 is the syringe body. Alternatively, the piston assembly 14 can be a small commercially available system used for model airplane landing gear. In a further embodiment, the piston 16 is custom machined with an o-ring around the piston head, while the cylinder 18 is a machined or molded cavity within the robot's base or arms.
The valve component 30 has a valve for each piston assembly 14. Thus, the valve component 30 may have anywhere from one valve to any number equal to the maximum number of valves provided in the system.
Another example of a valve component 32 is provided in
As mentioned above, the fluid actuation systems depicted in
According to one embodiment of a pneumatic system, in place of the pump 26, accumulator 28, and reservoir 24. the external pneumatic component 22 is a pressurized cylinder (not shown). In this embodiment, the return air is emitted into the external environment of the system. One example of a pressurized cylinder is a canister of readily-available carbon dioxide, which is commonly used to insufflate the abdominal cavity during laparoscopic surgery. Alternatively, the external pneumatic components 22 can be any known configuration of any pneumatic components capable of pneumatically powering the piston 16.
Alternatively, the device 40 can have from one to any number of piston assemblies that can be integrated into the robotic device as actuation components. According to one embodiment, a piston is provided for each degree of freedom.
According to one embodiment as shown in
The operational component 100 is coupled to the sliding component 110 at joint 112 such that the sliding back and forth of the sliding component 110 causes the operational component 100 to extend and retract relative to the arm 102. This allows for the lengthening and shortening of the reach of the operational component 100 with respect to the arm 102 and the procedural space in which the operational component 100 is operating. Stated in another way, according to one embodiment, this slidable coupling of the sliding component 110 and the arm 102 is considered to be the “wrist” of the arm 102, wherein the sliding of the sliding component 110 back and forth operates to lengthen and shorten the “wrist” in relation to the rest of the arm 102.
In one embodiment, an actuator (not shown) disposed in the sliding component 108 actuates the operational component 100. For example, in the embodiment depicted in
It is understood that a pneumatic system could be incorporated into any of the embodiments and components depicted in
In accordance with one implementation, a device having a fluid actuation system such as the various systems disclosed herein could reduce costs associated with the device. That is, the components of the system associated with the device can be integrated into the device at a low cost (in comparison to devices having costly onboard motors, etc.), while the more expensive components can be incorporated into the external components of the system and thus can be re-used for extended periods of time. In another embodiment, the use of a fluid actuation system in a device can provide increased force and/or speed in comparison to internal motors.
In a further alternative embodiment, the device is a “hybrid” that has at least one piston and at least one motor, thereby providing for further flexibility in the configuration of the device and the capability of accomplishing very precise motions. For example, the precise motions could include motions of the wrist such as rotation or extension that might require very precise control for delicate tissue dissection. In such an embodiment, the fluid actuation piston assemblies could be used for purposes of gross and/or quick actuations that require greater power, such as actuation of the shoulder and/or elbow joints, while the motor assemblies could be used for purposes of precise, slower actuations, such as actuation of the wrist or operational component for precise tasks such as dissection. In this context, the fluid actuation assemblies of the shoulder and elbow joints could then subsequently be used for the pulling or cutting motions that require greater power.
In addition to the fluid actuation systems described above, yet another actuation system that can be implemented with the various medical devices disclosed or incorporated herein is a drive train system. One exemplary implementation of a drive train system is shown in
In one embodiment as shown in
Alternatively, the drive component 204 is a flexible rod that is capable of transferring rotational power to the device 202. In a further embodiment, the drive component 204 is any known drive component capable of transferring power to a robotic device 202.
As shown in
As described above, the drive component 204 can be a rotary shaft 204 that supplies rotational actuation to the device 202. In one exemplary implementation, the shaft 204 has a series of clutches (not shown) that transfer the actuation to the piston assemblies or other translation assemblies for actuation of the joints and other actuable components. The miniature clutches are common components that are available commercially from Small Parts, Inc., located in Miami Lakes, Fla. In one embodiment, the clutches are operated hydraulically. Alternatively, the clutches are operated electrically or by any other known method.
In a further alternative implementation, the drive component 204 winds one or more onboard tensionable springs that can then be used to provide power to the end effectors or other drivable/driven components in the device through a clutch system.
Alternatively, the rotary shaft 204 is a flexible rod 204. In this embodiment, the insertion component 206 does not necessarily need to be straight. In one example, the insertion component 206 is inserted through the esophagus of the patient and into the abdominal cavity through an incision in the stomach wall. The inner flexible rod 204 is positioned within the insertion component 206 and coupled to the robotic device 202. In this example, the flexible rod 204 is rotated to provide rotational actuation to the robotic device 202.
One component that can be used in conjunction with any fluid actuation or drive train actuation system such as those systems described above is a reversibly lockable tube. As used herein, “reversibly lockable tube” is intended to mean any tubular component that can be switched, adjusted, or otherwise changed between a flexible configuration and a locked configuration (in which “locked” is intended to encompass any level of substantial rigidity). This adjustability between flexible and rigid configurations shall also be referred to herein as the “reversibly lockable” feature. Please note that the term “tube” as used herein is intended to encompass any tubular or hose-like component that provides access to various cavities of a patient's body for medical procedure devices and/or connection to such devices positioned in the patient's body.
One example of modular tube components 260 (such as those used in the tube 240 shown in
As shown in
According to one embodiment as best shown in
In use, the tube (such as tubes 220 or 240, for example) is placed in its flexible configuration or state for insertion of the robotic device into the patient's body. Once the device has been positioned as desired by the user (such as the positioning of the device 222 and tube 220 depicted in
In addition to the fluid actuation system and drive train embodiments discussed above, yet another actuation component that can be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices disclosed or otherwise described herein is a motorless actuation system or component.
It is understood that this embodiment is similar to the embodiments disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/766,720, filed on Jun. 21, 2007, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/766,683, filed on Jun. 21, 2007, both of which were incorporated herein above. It is further understood that any of the instant motorless actuation component embodiments can be incorporated into any of the embodiments disclosed in those co-pending applications.
In the implementation shown in
It is understood that the magnets 318 in the device 310 and those magnets 322 in the handle 312 can be positioned in any configuration and include any number of magnets as disclosed in the U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/766,720 and 11/766,683, incorporated herein.
It is further understood that, in one embodiment, the magnetic handle 312, also referred to herein as an “external magnet,” is in the shape of a handle. Alternatively, the handle 312 is intended to encompass any magnetic component that is magnetically coupleable with any robotic device as described herein such that the magnetic component can be used to position, operate, or control the device.
In one embodiment as described in the incorporated references above, the handle 312 can be rotated as shown by arrow 342 to allow a tilting functionality for the imaging component. Further, the device can also provide for a panning functionality via rotation of the imaging component as shown by arrow 344, as described in further detail below.
In use, the device 310 can be moved within the patient's body to any desired position by moving the handle 312 outside the body. Alternatively, the device 310 can be positioned, operated, or controlled anywhere in a patient's body at least in part by the magnetic handle 312 positioned outside the body in any fashion described in the references incorporated above.
According to one implementation, the robotic device 310 shown in
In one implementation, the actuation component 334 that rotates the inner portion 330 relative to the outer portion 332 is a motorless actuation component. That is, the actuation component is not a motor or a motorized component of any kind. For example, the actuation component 334 as shown in
In yet another alternative embodiment, the ball can be urged along the race by other means. For example, the device can have a cable or wire connected to it and also connected to an external handle. Actuation of this cable urges the ball along the race, thereby resulting in a panning motion of the inner body relative to the outer sleeve. In one embodiment, the cable is attached or operably coupled in some fashion to the ball so that actuation of the cable urges the ball along the race.
In a further alternative, the motorless actuation component does not include a ball and race, but instead has a drum. In this embodiment, a cable such as that described above is attached to the drum so that actuation of the cable urges the drum to rotate. This rotation of the drum causes rotational actuation in the medical device. Alternatively, any known method of transitioning translation motion into rotary motion could be used. Further, it is understood that any known motorless actuation component can be incorporated into any of the medical devices described herein or incorporated by reference herein.
Various mechanical arm embodiments are provided herein that can be incorporated into any number of different kinds of medical devices. The medical device arm configurations disclosed herein provide for various arm embodiments having two degrees of freedom—both (1) axial movement (extension and retraction of a portion of the arm along the longitudinal axis of the arm), and (2) rotational movement around the axis of the arm. These configurations provide for the two degrees of freedom while maintaining a relatively small or compact structure in comparison to prior art configurations.
It is understood that the arm embodiments disclosed herein can be utilized in any type of medical device, including those devices in which a compact or smaller size is desirable, such as devices for procedures to be performed within a patient. For example, the arm embodiments could be incorporated into various robotic medical devices, including in vivo robotic devices such as robotic devices positionable on or near an interior cavity wall of a patient, mobile robotic devices, or robotic visualization and control systems. An “in vivo device” as used herein is any device that can be positioned, operated, or controlled at least in part by a user while being positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including any device that is positioned substantially against or adjacent to a wall of a body cavity of a patient, and further including any such device that is internally actuated (having no external source of motive force). As used herein, the terms “robot,” and “robotic device” shall refer to any device that can perform a task either in response to a command or automatically. Further, the arm embodiments could be incorporated into various robotic medical device systems that are actuated externally, such as those available from Apollo Endosurgery, Inc., Hansen Medical, Inc., Intuitive Surgical, Inc., and other similar systems.
According to one embodiment as depicted in
The distal gear 412 has gear teeth 416 on its outer surface and further is threaded on its inner surface (not shown). The gear teeth 416 mate or couple with gear teeth 418 on a drive gear 420, which is coupled to an actuator (not shown). In one embodiment, the actuator is a Permanent Magnet Direct Current (“PMDC”) motor. Thus, the distal gear 412 is driven by the actuator.
The threading on the inner surface of the distal gear 412 mates or couples with the threading 413 on the outer surface of the arm 410 such that when the distal gear 412 is driven by the actuator, the gear 412 rotates and the coupling of the threads on the inner surface of the gear 412 with the threads 413 on the arm 410 causes the arm 410 to extend or retract depending on which direction the gear 412 turns.
The proximal gear 414 has gear teeth 422 on its outer surface that mate or couple with gear teeth 424 on a drive gear 426, which is coupled to an actuator (not shown). The gear 414 also has a pin 428 disposed within the gear 414 that extends through the gear 414 and further through a slot 430 in the arm 410. Thus, when the proximal gear 414 turns, the pin 428 causes the arm 410 to turn as well.
The distal 412 and proximal 414 gears interface or interact at the bearing surfaces. More specifically, the distal gear 412 has a bearing surface 432 (best shown in
In an alternative embodiment, gear pairs 418, 412 and 424, 422 as depicted in
In a further embodiment, the gears can also be replaced with a series of cables and drums that are used to actuate the arm. In this pulley system embodiment, the actuator that drives the cables can be located in another portion of the robot, while a series of drums are disposed on the arms. The cabling connects the drums with the actuator (such as a motor). This embodiment allows the actuators, drums, and arm components to be configured in a variety of different orientations while still providing sufficient actuation forces and speed to the arm end effectors.
The distal gear 452 has gear teeth 456 and is threaded on its inner surface (not shown). The gear teeth 456 mate or couple with gear teeth 458 on a drive gear 460, which is coupled to an actuator (not shown). As with the previous embodiment, the threading on the inner surface of the distal gear 452 mates or couples with the threading (453) on the outer surface of the arm 450 such that when the distal gear 452 is driven by the actuator, the gear 452 rotates and the coupling of the threads on the inner surface of the gear 452 with the threads 453 on the arm 450 causes the arm 450 to extend or retract depending on which direction the gear 452 turns.
Similarly, the proximal gear 454 has gear teeth 462 on its outer surface that mate or couple with gear teeth 464 on a drive gear 466, which is coupled to an actuator (not shown). The gear 454 also has a pin 468 disposed within the gear 454 that extends through the gear 454 and further through a slot 470 in the arm 450. Thus, when the proximal gear 454 turns, the pin 468 causes the arm 450 to turn as well.
The bearing surfaces in this embodiment depicted in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
One end effector or operational component that can be used with any of the procedural devices disclosed herein is a winch system. Generally, the devices or systems discussed herein are configured to be inserted into or positioned in a patient's body, such as a body cavity, for example. Alternatively, the winch systems and devices disclosed herein can be used with any medical or procedural device.
One embodiment of a medical device having a winch component is set forth in
In the implementation depicted in
In accordance with the depicted embodiment, the device 510 has magnets 520 that are magnetically coupleable with magnets 532 on the handle 512 such that the device 510 is urged toward and held against the body cavity wall. The device 510, the handle 512, and the magnets 520, 532 can be configured and/or operated in the same fashion as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/766,720, filed on Jun. 21, 2007 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Robotic Devices and Related Methods,” which is incorporated by reference above. In one embodiment, it is understood that the magnets 520 are configured not only to ensure that the imaging component 516 is positioned to capture a view of the body cavity or the target area of interest for securing the winch 524, but are also configured to provide a magnetic coupling that is strong enough to maintain the device 510 in a stable and substantially fixed position such that the winch component 524 can be operated as desired and as described herein.
According to the exemplary embodiment in
In one embodiment, the winch tether 528 is made from suture material. In another embodiment, it is metallic cabling. Alternatively, any known material for use in a medical winch tether can be used.
In one embodiment, various operational components or end effectors can be attached to the end of the winch tether. In one embodiment, the end of the winch tether 528 is attached to a hook 536, as depicted in the embodiment of
In another embodiment, the operational component can be a magnet 540 that can be held against the wall with a second handle 542 as depicted in
The winch components and systems can be used to accomplish a variety of procedural tasks. In one embodiment, a device having a winch component could be used to retract an organ, such as the gallbladder, as depicted for example in
In yet another alternative embodiment, the winch component can be any known configuration or be made up of any known components for use in a winch. Further, while certain device embodiments are described for exemplary purposes herein, it is understood that a winch component can be incorporated into any known robotic device for use inside a patient. For example, such a component can be incorporated into any of the devices disclosed in the applications that are incorporated herein elsewhere in this application.
Various additional embodiments disclosed herein relate to procedural devices with modular mechanical and electrical packages that can be used together in various combinations to provide capabilities such as obtaining multiple tissue samples, monitoring physiological parameters, and wireless command, control and data telemetry. This modular technology provides a flexible device into which one or more of various different components or systems can be integrated.
Current known minimally-invasive surgical technologies require two to three ports to accommodate the laparoscopic tools to explore the abdominal cavity and biopsy tissue of interest. The various embodiments of the devices and modular components disclosed herein require only one port for any medical procedure, thereby reducing patient trauma (1 incision rather than 2 or 3).
The modular technology disclosed herein can be incorporated into any type of medical procedural device and is not limited to the robotic devices described in detail herein. Certain device embodiments can be in vivo or robotic devices as defined herein, including devices configured to be positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including certain devices that can be positioned against or substantially adjacent to an interior cavity wall, and related systems. For example,
In this embodiment, the upper jaw component 630 is moved in relation to the piercing component 602 via the collar 604. More specifically, the collar 604 is movably disposed over the piercing component 602 such that it can move back and forth in the direction indicated by arrow A. A proximal portion of the upper jaw component 630 is disposed between the piercing component 602 and the collar 604 and is configured to be positioned such that the distal end of the upper jaw 630 is not in contact with the piercing component 602 and remains in that position when no force is applied to the jaw 630. Thus, when the collar 604 is urged toward the distal end of the piercing component 602, the distal end of the upper jaw component 630 is urged toward the piercing component 602 such that the component 630 is capable of incising or cutting any tissue disposed between the upper jaw 630 and the piercing component 602 as the upper jaw 630 makes contact with the component 602. And when the collar 604 is urged away from the distal end of the piercing component 602, the distal end of the upper jaw 630 moves away from the piercing component 602 and toward its unrestrained position. Alternatively, it is understood that any known component that can operate in the same fashion as the collar to urge the upper jaw 630 into contact with the piercing component 602 can be incorporated herein.
The collar 604 is urged back and forth by the motor 624. It is understood that this embodiment is intended to encompass any actuation structure that urges the collar 634 to move back and forth such that the upper jaw component 630 is urged to move in relation to the piercing component 602 and thereby cut target tissue.
In this particular embodiment as shown in
The slider 608 is coupled to the collar 604 at two flexible components 606A, 606B, which can be shape-memory components 606A, 606B according to one embodiment. In one example, the flexible components 606A, 606B are comprised of nitinol. Further, the piercing component 602 is coupled to the housing 622 via a flexible component 626. According to one embodiment, the flexible component 626 is a shape-memory component 626 such as nitinol. These flexible components 606A, 606B, and 626 allow for the grasper 632 to be repositioned in relation to the rest of the robotic device to which it is coupled, as will be discussed in further detail below.
Alternatively, the actuation component and the connection of the actuation component to the collar 634 can be any known structure or component or combination thereof that provides motive force to actuate the grasper 632.
In one alternative implementation, the piercing component 602 has an internal reservoir (not shown) for storing one or more acquired samples. Unlike most standard laparoscopic biopsy tools that include space for only a single sample, this reservoir can be generally large enough or long enough (or otherwise has sufficient volume) to house multiple samples during a biopsy procedure.
In use, the biopsy component 600 is positioned next to the target tissue using a method such as the mobile robot wheel, or articulating robot arm. Next, the biopsy component 600 operates in the following manner to obtain a tissue sample. The motor 624 actuates the collar 604 to move toward the distal end of the piercing component 602 and thus actuates the upper jaw 630 to close and contact the piercing component 602. The tissue is cut as the upper jaw 630 is actuated towards the piercing component 602 in a slicing motion. In one embodiment the tissue sample is then stored in the piercing component 602 while additional samples are taken.
It is understood that the device containing the biopsy component 600 may also have other actuable components such as wheels, arms, etc.
In one aspect, the biopsy component 600 can also be configured to make it easier for the medical device to be inserted through incisions, transported, and stored.
Alternatively, a variety of alternative support mechanisms using this concept can be envisioned.
In this embodiment, the slider 656 performs generally the same function as the collar described in
Unlike other laparoscopic biopsy forceps in which both jaws are hinged about a pivot point, only one jaw, the top jaw 664, of the robotic grasper moves during sampling. The lower half of the grasper, bottom jaw 666, remains stationary and provides a rigid and stable base against which the top jaw 664 can cut. The fixed bottom jaw 666 is constructed from a hypodermic medical stainless steel tube and it forms a reservoir for storing multiple samples.
In one embodiment the profile of the top jaw 664 is constructed out of a super-elastic shape-memory nickel titanium alloy (Nitinol) ribbon (Memry Corporation) 0.25 mm thick and 3 mm wide. It is profiled such that the grasper is normally open. A wide variety of profiles can be achieved by heat-treating the ribbon for approximately 10 min at 500° C., followed by quenching in water. The Nitinol ribbon is glued to a fixed nylon rod insert that fits inside the bottom jaw 666.
The blades of the grasper are titanium nitrate coated stainless steel approximately 1.5 mm long. Small plastic inserts are fixed to the top and bottom jaws, and the blades 668 and 670 are glued to these inserts. The round blade 670 fixed to the bottom jaw has a diameter of 3 mm. The top blade 668 has a semi-circular profile with a diameter of 3.8 mm and overlaps the bottom blade when the jaw is closed. The sample is held within the bottom blade as the trailing edges of the top blade help sever the sample from the tissue.
This stapling arm 680 was designed to hold and close a common laparoscopic surgical staple. In addition to stapling, this end effector can also be used for applications requiring clamping and holding, such as applying pressure to a bleeding blood vessel or manipulating other tissues of interest.
According to one embodiment, an imaging component in any medical device disclosed or incorporated herein having an imaging component can have an adjustable focus mechanism incorporated into or used with the imaging component. One exemplary implementation of such an adjustable focus mechanism 702 is depicted in
In one embodiment, the small magnets 716 are Neodymium Magnets manufactured by K and J Magnetics of Jamison, Pa., the coils 712 are manufactured by Precision Econowind of North Fort Myers, Fla., and the lens 710 is manufactured by Sunex of Carlsbad, Calif. In this embodiment the magnets have a pull force of 2.17 lbs and a surface field of 2505 Gauss, while the coils are made of 120 turns of 36 AWG coated copper wire with a DSL758 lens. Alternatively, the above components can be any commercially available components.
According to one implementation, the lens holding component 714 is manufactured of polycarbonate plastic to minimize weight. In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment, a restoring force is provided that urges the lens 710 back to it resting position when the current from the coiled wire 712 is removed. This allows for consistent lens subassembly travel and can be used to maintain the lens in an optimum middle range of focus. According to one implementation, the restoring force component 720 as best shown in
In accordance with one embodiment, the adjustable focus mechanism 702 is coupled with an auto focus algorithm to automatically command the mechanism 702 to focus the lens to a commanded depth. In a further embodiment, additional lens subassemblies 704 and magnetic subassemblies 706 can be combined to provide additional points of depth adjustment around the lens. These additional adjustment points allow a higher range of orientation angles of the lens to correct for any imperfections in manufacturing assembly. In this embodiment, the coils can be commanded separately to tilt the lens to correct for manufacturing error.
In this example, different biopsy grasper profiles and lengths were examined, including the effects of those profiles and lengths on the forces required to actuate the biopsy mechanism and further the maximum forces that could actually be applied by the mechanism.
Various grasper embodiments with a wide range of jaw lengths, opening angles, and jaw profiles were tested for actuation forces. Required actuation forces were determined by using the motor 732 and lead screw linkage 736 to slide the grasper collar 738 over the upper jaw 744 until closed. For each actuation, the required force was recorded starting with the upper jaw 744 completely open and continuing until the upper jaw 744 was closed. Maximum actuation forces were determined by recording the forces applied with the collar 738 held fixed at various positions corresponding to different times during actuation process. Each complete test consisted of 50 actuations of the biopsy grasper. Load cell data were recorded during each actuation at a rate of 20 Hz.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/329,705, filed on Dec. 9, 2011 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Procedures,” now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,828,024, which is a continuation application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,171, filed on Jul. 11, 2008 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices,” both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. Further, U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,171 claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/949,390, filed Jul. 12, 2007; Provisional Application No. 60/949,391, filed Jul. 12, 2007; Provisional Application No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007; and Provisional Application No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
This invention was made with government support under grant number R21 EB056632 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3870264 | Robinson | Mar 1975 | A |
3989952 | Timberlake et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4246661 | Pinson | Jan 1981 | A |
4258716 | Sutherland | Mar 1981 | A |
4278077 | Mizumoto | Jul 1981 | A |
4538594 | Boebel et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4568311 | Miyaki | Feb 1986 | A |
4623183 | Amori | Nov 1986 | A |
4736645 | Zimmer | Apr 1988 | A |
4771652 | Zimmer | Sep 1988 | A |
4852391 | Ruch et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4896015 | Taboada et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897014 | Tietze | Jan 1990 | A |
4922755 | Oshiro et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922782 | Kawai | May 1990 | A |
4990050 | Tsuge et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5019968 | Wang et al. | May 1991 | A |
5108140 | Bartholet | Apr 1992 | A |
5172639 | Wiesman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176649 | Wakabayashi | Jan 1993 | A |
5178032 | Zona et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5187032 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5187796 | Wang et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195388 | Zona et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201325 | McEwen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5263382 | Brooks et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271384 | McEwen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284096 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5297536 | Wilk | Mar 1994 | A |
5304899 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307447 | Asano et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5353807 | DeMarco | Oct 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5441494 | Oritz | Jan 1995 | A |
5388528 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458131 | Wilk | Oct 1995 | A |
5458583 | McNeely et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458598 | Feinberg et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5515478 | Wang | May 1996 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5588442 | Scovil et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620417 | Jang et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5624380 | Shuichi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624398 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632761 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645520 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657429 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657584 | Hamlin | Aug 1997 | A |
5672168 | de la Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674030 | Sigel | Oct 1997 | A |
5728599 | Rosteker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736821 | Suyaman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754741 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791231 | Cohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797538 | Heaton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5815640 | Wang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825982 | Wright et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841950 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845646 | Lemelson | Dec 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878193 | Wang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5895417 | Pomeranz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907664 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910129 | Koblish et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911036 | Wright et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5971976 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993467 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
6001108 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007550 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6030365 | Laufer | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6058323 | Lemelson | May 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6102850 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107795 | Smart | Aug 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6132441 | Grace | Oct 2000 | A |
6139563 | Cosgrove, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156006 | Brosens et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159146 | El Gazayerli | Dec 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
D438617 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D441076 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2001 | S |
6223100 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D441862 | Cooper et al. | May 2001 | S |
6238415 | Sepetka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240312 | Alfano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244809 | Wang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D444555 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6286514 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296635 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309397 | Julian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309403 | Minoret et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321106 | Lemelson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327492 | Lemelson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tiemey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364888 | Niemeyer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398726 | Ramans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400980 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408224 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432112 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450104 | Grant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454758 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463361 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468203 | Belson | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468265 | Evans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470236 | Ohtsuki | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491691 | Morley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Nemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493608 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496099 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508413 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512345 | Borenstein | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522906 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544276 | Azizi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548982 | Papanikolopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554790 | Moll | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565554 | Niemeyer | May 2003 | B1 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591239 | McCall et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594552 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610007 | Belson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620173 | Gerbi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642836 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646541 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648814 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661571 | Shioda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684129 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685698 | Morley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687571 | Byrne | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692485 | Brock et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699177 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6699235 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702734 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702805 | Stuart | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714839 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714841 | Wright et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719684 | Kim et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720988 | Gere et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726699 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728599 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730021 | Vassiliades, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731988 | Green | May 2004 | B1 |
6746443 | Morley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764441 | Chiel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764445 | Ramans et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766204 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770081 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774597 | Borenstein | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776165 | Jin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780184 | Tanrisever | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785593 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788018 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792663 | Krzyzanowski | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793653 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799088 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801325 | Farr et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804581 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810281 | Brock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817972 | Snow | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817975 | Farr et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820653 | Schempf et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824508 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824510 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832988 | Sprout | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832996 | Woloszko et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836703 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837883 | Moll et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840938 | Morley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858003 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860346 | Burt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860877 | Sanchez et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6866671 | Tiemey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870343 | Borenstein et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871117 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871563 | Choset et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892112 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899705 | Niemeyer | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905460 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905491 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911916 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917176 | Schempf et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933695 | Blumenkranz | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936001 | Snow | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936003 | Iddan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943663 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949096 | Davison et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965812 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974411 | Belson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974449 | Niemeyer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979423 | Moll | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984205 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993413 | Sunaoshi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994703 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997908 | Carrillo, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025064 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027892 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033344 | Imran | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039453 | Mullick | May 2006 | B2 |
7042184 | Oleynikov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053752 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063682 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7066879 | Fowler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066926 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074179 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077446 | Kameda et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083571 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083615 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087049 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097640 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105000 | McBrayer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107090 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109678 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7121781 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125403 | Julian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126303 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147650 | Lee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182025 | Ghorbel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182089 | Ries | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199545 | Oleynikov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206626 | Quaid, III | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210364 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217240 | Snow | May 2007 | B2 |
7239940 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250028 | Julian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259652 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273488 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311107 | Harel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339341 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7372229 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7447537 | Funda et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7492116 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7566300 | Devierre et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574250 | Niemeyer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645230 | Mikkaichi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655004 | Long | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670329 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678043 | Gilad | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731727 | Sauer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762825 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772796 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785251 | Wilk | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785333 | Miyamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789825 | Nobis et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794494 | Sahatjian et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7865266 | Moll et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7960935 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8021358 | Doyle et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8179073 | Farritor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8353897 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8604742 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9089353 | Farritor | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20010018591 | Brock et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049497 | Kalloo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003173 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013601 | Nobles et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026186 | Woloszka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038077 | de la Torre et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065507 | Azizi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091374 | Cooper | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103417 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111535 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120254 | Julien et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128552 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140392 | Borenstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147487 | Sundquist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151906 | Demarais et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156347 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171385 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173700 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190682 | Schempf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020810 | Takizawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045888 | Brock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065250 | Chiel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089267 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092964 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097129 | Davison et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100817 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114731 | Cadeddu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139742 | Wampler et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144656 | Ocel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167000 | Mullick | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172871 | Scherer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179308 | Zamorano et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181788 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030229268 | Uchiyama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230372 | Schmidt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040117032 | Roth et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034282 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034283 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034302 | Abovitz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050394 | Jin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070822 | Shioda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099175 | Perrot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102772 | Baxter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111113 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138552 | Harel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140786 | Borenstein | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153057 | Davison | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173116 | Ghorbel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176664 | Iddan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215331 | Chew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225229 | Viola | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254680 | Sunaoshi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267326 | Ocel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014994 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021069 | Feuer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029978 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043583 | Killmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049462 | Kanazawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054901 | Yoshino | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054902 | Konno | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064378 | Toly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083460 | Hattori et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095650 | Khalili et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143644 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154376 | Riviere et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165449 | Cadeddu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050283137 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288555 | Binmoeller | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288665 | Woloszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020272 | Gildenberg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046226 | Bergler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060119304 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149135 | Paz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152591 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155263 | Lipow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195015 | Mullick et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196301 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060198619 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241570 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241732 | Denker | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253109 | Chu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258954 | Timberlake et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032701 | Fowler et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043397 | Ocel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055342 | Wu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080658 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106113 | Ravo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142725 | Hardin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156211 | Ferren et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167955 | De La Menardiere et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225633 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225634 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241714 | Oleynikov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244520 | Ferren et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250064 | Darois et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255273 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004634 | Farritor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015565 | Davison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015566 | Livneh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033569 | Ferren et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045803 | Williams | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058835 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058989 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103440 | Ferren et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109014 | de la Pena | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111513 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119870 | Williams et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132890 | Woloszko et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161804 | Rioux et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164079 | Ferren et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183033 | Bern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221591 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080269557 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269562 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020724 | Paffrath | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024142 | Ruiz Morales | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048612 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054909 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069821 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076536 | Rentschler et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143787 | De La Pena | Jun 2009 | A9 |
20090163929 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171373 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234369 | Bax et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236400 | Cole et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240246 | Devill et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247821 | Rogers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248038 | Blumenkranz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281377 | Newell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305210 | Guru et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010294 | Conlon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016659 | Weitzner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016853 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042097 | Newton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056863 | Dejima et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069710 | Yamatani et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069940 | Miller et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081875 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100139436 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100198231 | Manzo et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204713 | Ruiz | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245549 | Allen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262162 | Omori | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292691 | Brogna | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318059 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015569 | Kirschenman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020779 | Hannaford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071347 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071544 | Steger et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077478 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082365 | McGrogan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098529 | Ostrovsky et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110152615 | Schostek et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110224605 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230894 | Simaan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237890 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238080 | Ranjit et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264078 | Lipow | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270443 | Kamiya et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120035582 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120109150 | Quaid et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116362 | Kieturakis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120179168 | Farritor | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120253515 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130041360 | Farritor | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130131695 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130345717 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140039515 | Mondry et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046340 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058205 | Frederick et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140303434 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150051446 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1082821918 | Dec 2012 | CN |
102010040405 | Mar 2012 | DE |
1354670 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2329787 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2563261 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2004144533 | May 1990 | JP |
5115425 | May 1993 | JP |
200716235 | Jun 1993 | JP |
2006507809 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07 136173 | May 1995 | JP |
7306155 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-224248 | Sep 1996 | JP |
201505810 | May 2001 | JP |
2001505810 | May 2001 | JP |
2003220065 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004322310 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004180781 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004329292 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006508049 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2009-106606 | May 2009 | JP |
2010-533045 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-536436 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-504794 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011-045500 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-115591 | Jun 2011 | JP |
WO 199221291 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 0189405 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2002082979 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2002100256 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2005009211 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2005009211 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005044095 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2006052927 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006 005075 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006079108 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006079108 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007011654 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007111571 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149559 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009023851 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009144729 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2010042611 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010046823 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO201050771 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2011118646 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011135503 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2011135503 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2011075693 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2013009887 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2014011238 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17. |
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Rootics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges”, “Computer Aided Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 312-328, vol. 6. |
Green, “Telepresence Surgery”, Jan. 1, 1995, Publisher: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from related case PCT/US2007/014567, dated Jan. 8, 2009, 11 pp. |
International Search report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US2012/41911, dated Mar. 13, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US12/46274, dated Sep. 25, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US2007/089191, dated Nov. 10, 2008, 20 pp. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion from international application No. PCT/US07/14567, dated Apr. 28, 2008, 19 pp.” |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2008/069822, dated Aug. 5, 2009, 12 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2008/073334, dated Jan. 12, 2009, 11 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2008/073369, dated Nov. 12, 2008, 12 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US11/46809, dated Dec. 8, 2011. |
Ishiyama et al., “Spiral-type Micro-machine for Medical Applications,” 2000 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, 2000: 65-69. |
Jagannath et al., “Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61(3): 449-453. |
Kalloo et al., “Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004; 60(1): 114-117. |
Kang et al., “Robotic Assistants Aid Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Procedures,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan.-Feb. 2001; pp. 94-104. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 62(2): 287-292. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2006; 20: 522-525. |
Kazemier et al. (1998), “Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopy,” J. Am. Coli. Surg. 186(5): 604-5. |
Kim, “Early Experience with Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using da Vinci,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):33-40. |
Ko et al., “Per-Oral transgastric abdominal surgery,” Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2006; 7: 67-70. |
Lafullarde et al., “Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Five-year Results and Beyond,” Arch/Surg, Feb. 2001; 136:180-184. |
Leggett et al. (2002), “Aortic injury during laparoscopic fundoplication,” Surg. Endoscopy 16(2): 362. |
Li et al. (2000), “Microvascular Anastomoses Performed in Rats Using a Microsurgical Telemanipulator,” Comp. Aid. Surg. 5: 326-332. |
Liem et al., “Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-hernia Repair,” New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336(22): 1541-1547. |
MacFarlane et al., “Force-Feedback Grasper Helps Restore the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999; 3: 278-285. |
Mack et al., “Present Role of Thoracoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Chest,” Ann Thorac Surgery, 1992; 54: 403-409. |
Mack, “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” JAMA, Feb. 2001; 285(5): 568-572. |
Mei et al., “Wireless Drive and Control of a Swimming Microrobot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 1131-1136. |
Melvin et al., “Computer-Enhanced vs. Standard Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery,” J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-16. |
Menciassi et al., “Locomotion of a Leffed Capsule in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Theoretical Study and Preliminary Technological Results,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2767-2770, Sep. 2004. |
Menciassi et al., “Robotic Solutions and Mechanisms for a Semi-Autonomous Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002; 1379-1384. |
Menciassi et al., “Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng, 2005, 15: 2045-2055. |
Meron, “The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 52 6: 817-819. |
Micron, http://www.micron.com, 2006, I/4-inch VGA NTSC/PAL CMOS Digital Image Sensor, 98 pp. |
Midday Jeff et al., “Material Handling System for Robotic natural Orifice Surgery”, Proceedings of the 2011 Design of medical Devices Conference, Apr. 12-14, 2011, Minneapolis, MN, 4 pages. |
Miller, Ph.D., et al., “In-Vivo Stereoscopic Imaging System with 5 Degrees-of-Freedom for Minimal Access Surgery,” Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, 7 pp. |
Munro (2002), “Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques,” Curro Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 14(4): 365-74. |
Nio et al., “Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks,” Surg Endosc, 2002; 16: 412-415. |
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/552,379, 5 pp. |
Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2009, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,516, 43 pp. |
Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2006, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,174, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2006, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2007, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2008, received in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,441, 4 pp. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Improved Vision for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Chicago, IL, Jun. 23-26, 2004b. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Robotic Laparoscopy,” Surgical Innovation, Jun. 2005, 12(2): 177-181. |
Oleynikov et al., “Miniature Robots Can Assist in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 19-4: 473-476, 2005. |
O'Neill, “Surgeon takes new route to gallbladder,” The Oregonian, Jun. 2007, 2 pp. |
Orlando et al., (2003), “Needle and Trocar Injuries in Diagnostic Laparoscopy under Local Anesthesia: What Is the True Incidence of These Complications?” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 13(3): 181-184. |
Park et al., “Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy: Magnetic Positioning of Intra-abdominal Camera and Retractor,” Ann Surg, Mar. 2007; 245(3): 379-384. |
Park et al., “Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61(4): 601-606. |
Patronik et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” IEEE, pp. 239-240. |
Patronik et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” MICCAI, 2004, pp. 9-16. |
Patronik et al., “Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart,” Computer Aided Surgery, 10(4): 225-232, Jul. 2005. |
Peirs et al., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2001, 92: 343-349. |
Peters, “Minimally Invasive Colectomy: Are the Potential Benefits Realized?” Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 751-756. |
Phee et al., “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 613-616. |
Phee et al., “Development of Microrobotic Devices for Locomotion in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CIRAS 2001), Nov. 28-30, (2001), Singapore. |
Platt et al., “In Vivo Robotic Cameras can Enhance Imaging Capability During Laparoscopic Surgery,” in the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005, I pg. |
Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 11, 2007, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, 7 pp. |
Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 30, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,413, 4 pp. |
RCE and Amendment filed Jun. 13, 2007, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, 8 pp. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy and Camera Robot,” Studies in Health and Infonnatics Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 119., pp. 449-454, IOS Press, Long Beach, CA, 2006e. |
Rentschler et al., Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006, pp. 4155-4160. |
Rentschler et al., “Miniature in vivo Robots for Remote and Harsh Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jan. 2006; 12(1): 66-75. |
Rentschler et al., “An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2007, vol. 1: 23-29. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Mobile Surgical Robotic Task Assistance,” 1 pg. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Robotics during the NEEMO 9 Mission,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, I pg. |
Rentschler et al., “In Vivo Robots for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Newport Beach, CA, 2004a, 98: 316-322. |
Rentschler et al., “Mechanical Design of Robotic In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006a, pp. I-II. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Sole Visual Feedback for Abdominal Exploration and Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 20-I: 135-138, 2006b. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Robots Can Assist in Abdominal Exploration,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005b. |
Rentschler et al., “Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Study of In Vivo Wheeled Robotic Mobility,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22(2): 308-321, 2005c. |
Rentschler et al., “Natural Orifice Surgery with an Endoluminal Mobile Robot,” The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2006d, 14 pp. |
Rentschler et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 1-9. |
Rentschler et al., “Toward In Vivo Mobility,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Long Beach, CA, 2005a, III: 397-403. |
Response to Rule 312 Amendment in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, dated Jan. 12, 2009, 2 pp. |
Riviere et al., “Toward Active Tremor Canceling in Handheld Microsurgical Instruments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Oct. 2003, 19(5): 793-800. |
Rosen et al., “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic, Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221. |
Rosen et al., “Objective Laparoscopic Skills Assessments of Surgical Residents Using Hidden Markov Models Based on Haptic Information and Tool/Tissue Interactions,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Jan. 2001, 7 pp. |
Rosen et al., “Spherical Mechanism Analysis of a Surgical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Analytical and Experimental Approaches,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 442-448, Jan. 2005. |
Rosen et al., “Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents' Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 49-61, 2002. |
Rosen et al., “The Blue Dragon—A System of Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo,” Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1876-1881, May 2002. |
Ruurda et al., “Robot-Assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann R. Coll Surg Engl., 2002; 84: 223-226. |
Ruurda et al., “Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):41-45. |
Sackier et al., “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1994; 8: 63-66. |
Salky, “What is the Penetration of Endoscopic Techniques into Surgical Practice?” Digestive Surgery, 2000; 17:422-426. |
Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1): 6-16. |
Schippers et al., (1996) “Requirements and Possibilities of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery,” In: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pp. 561-565. |
Schurr et al., “Robotics and Telemanipulation Technologies for Endoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 375-381. |
Schwartz, “In the Lab: Robots that Slink and Squirm,” The New York Times, Mar. 27, 2007, 4 pp. |
Sharp LL-151-3D, http://www.sharp3d.com, 2006, 2 pp. |
Slatkin et al., “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 162-171, 1995. |
Smart Pill “Fantastic Voyage: Smart Pill to Expand Testing,” http://www.smartpilldiagnostics.com, Apr. 13, 2005, 1 pg. |
Southern Surgeons Club (1991), “A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” N. Eng. 1 Med. 324(16): 1073-1078. |
Stefanini et al., “Modeling and Experiments on a Legged Microrobot Locomoting in a Tubular Compliant and Slippery Environment,” Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 551-560, May-Jun. 2006. |
Stiff et al., “Long-term Pain: Less Common After Laparoscopic than Open Cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, 1994; 81: 1368-1370. |
Strong, et al., “Efficacy of Novel Robotic Camera vs. a Standard Laproscopic Camera,” Surgical Innovation vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2005, Westminster Publications, Inc., pp. 315-318. |
Suzumori et al., “Development of Flexible Microactuator and its Applications to Robotics Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991: 1622-1627. |
Taylor et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Eng Med Biol, 1995; 279-287. |
Tendick et al.. (1993), “Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation,” Presence 2( 1): 66-81. |
Tendick et al., “Applications of Micromechatronics in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1998; 3(1): 34-42. |
Thomann et al., “The Design of a new type of Micro Robot for the Intestinal Inspection,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002: 1385-1390. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/180,960, filed Feb. 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/956,032, filed Aug. 15, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/983,445, filed Oct. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,062, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,086, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,106, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,470, filed Nov. 27, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,588, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,617, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
Way et al., (editors), “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1995, 14 pp. |
Wolfe et al., “Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An analysis of Complications,” Arch. Surg. Oct. 1991; 126: 1192-1196. |
Worn et al., “Espirit Project No. 33915: Miniaturised Robot for Micro Manipulation (MINIMAN)”, Nov. 1998; http://www.ipr.ira.ujka.de/-microbot/miniman. |
Yu et al., “Microrobotic Cell Injection,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2001; 620-625. |
Yu, BSN, RN, “M2ATM Capsule Endoscopy A Breakthrough Diagnostic Tool for Small Intestine Imagining,” vol. 25, No. 1, Gastroenterology Nursing, pp. 24-27. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of international application No. PCT/US2010/061137, dated Feb. 11, 2011, 10 pp. |
Abbou et al., “Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 2001, 165: 1964-1966. |
Glukhovsky et al.., “The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surgery, 2004; I (1): 114-123. |
Gong et al., Wireless endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51(6): 725-729. |
Hanly et al., “Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2004; 19(4): 477-483. |
Hanly et al., “Robotic Abdominal Surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery 188 (Suppl.to Oct. 1994): 19S-26S, 2004. |
Heikkinen et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication two years after operation: A prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14: 1019-1023. |
Hissink, “Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology,” Dec. 2004, accessed Aug. 29, 2007, http://www.letsgodigital.org , 3 pp. |
Horgan et al., “Technical Report: Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001; 11(6): 415-419. |
Palm, William, “Rapid Prototyping Primer” May 1998 (revised Jul. 30, 2002) (http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm). |
Guo et al., “Micro Active Guide Wire Catheter System—Characteristic Evaluation, Electrical Model and Operability Evaluation of Micro Active Catheter,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1996: 2226-2231. |
Guo et al., “Fish-like Underwater Microrobot with 3 DOF,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 738-743. |
Abbott et al., “Design of an Endoluminal Notes Robotic System,” from the Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robot Systems, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, pp. 410-416. |
Allendorf et al., “Postoperative Immune Function Varies Inversely with the Degree of Surgical Trauma in a Murine Model,” Surgical Endoscopy 1997; 11:427-430. |
Ang, “Active Tremor Compensation in Handheld Instrument for Microsurgery,” Doctoral Dissertation, tech report CMU-RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon Unviersity, May 2004, 167pp. |
Applicant Amendment after Notice of Allowance under Rule 312, filed Aug. 25, 2008, in related case U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 6pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007, in related case U.S. Appl. No. 11/552,379, filed Aug. 8, 2007, 7 pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2006, in related case U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,174, filed Nov. 7, 2006, 8pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2006, in related case U.S. Appl. No. 11/403,756, filed Nov. 21, 2006, 52pp. |
Applicant Response to Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2007, in related case U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, filed Jan. 22, 2008, 6pp. |
Atmel 80C5X2 Core, http://www.atmel.com, 2006, 186pp. |
Bailey et al., “Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Quality Medical Publishers, Inc., 1995, 25pp. |
Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2002; 16: 1389-1402. |
Bauer et al., “Case Report: Remote Percutaneous Renal Percutaneous Renal Access Using a New Automated Telesurgical Robotic System,” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; (4): 341-347. |
Begos et al., “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Gimmick to Gold Standard,” J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994; 19(4): 325-330. |
Berg et al., “Surgery with Cooperative Robots,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, 1 pg. |
Breda et al., “Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy,” Eur. Urology 2001; 40(1): 84-91. |
Breedveld et al., “Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During Laparoscopic Surgery,” ASME, Jan. 2004; vol. 126, pp. 1-5. |
Breedveld et al., “Locomotion through the Intestine by means of Rolling Stents,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
Calafiore et al., Multiple Arterial Conduits Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Early Angiographic Results,: Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 67: 450-456. |
Camarillo et al., “Robotic Technology in Surgery: Past, Present and Future,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188: 2S-15. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Telesurgery and Surgical Simulation: Haptic Interfaces to Real and Virtual Surgical Environments,” In McLaughliin, M.L., Hespanha, J.P., and Sukhatme, G., editors. Touch in virtual environments, IMSC Series in Multimedia 2001, 28pp. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Robotics for Telesurgery: Second Generation Berkeley/UCSF Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation and Looking Towards the Future Applications,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2003; 30(1): 22-29. |
Chanthasopeephan et al., (2003), “Measuring Forces in Liver Cutting: New Equipment and Experimenal Results,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31: 1372-1382. |
Choi et al., “Flexure-based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Sep. 2005, 4pp. |
Cuschieri, “Technology for Minimal Access Surgery,” BMJ, 1999, 319: 1-6. |
Dakin et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems,” Surg Endosc., 2003; 17: 574-579. |
Dumpert et al., “Improving in Vivo Robot Visioin Quality,” from the Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Realtiy, Long Beach, CA, Jan. 26-29, 2005. 1 pg. |
Dumpert et al., “Stereoscopic In Vivo Surgical Robots,” IEEE Sensors Special Issue on In Vivo Sensors for Medicine, Jan. 2007, 10 pp. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 6 and Aug. 12, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 1 pg. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated May 9, 2008, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/695,944, 1 pg. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 30, 2006, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,174, 2pp. |
Falcone et al., “Robotic Surgery,” Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 46(1): 37-43. |
Faraz et al., “Engineering Approaches to Mechanical and Robotic Design for Minimaly Invasive Surgery (MIS),” Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston), 2000, 13pp. |
Fearing et al., “Wing Transmission for a Micromechanical Flying Insect,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference to Robotics & Automation, Apr. 2000; 1509-1516. |
Fireman et al., “Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's desease with wireless capsule endoscopy,” Gut 2003; 52: 390-392. |
Flynn et al., “Tomorrow's Surgery: micromotors and microbots for minimally invasive procedures,” Minimally Invasive Surgery & Allied Technologies. |
Franklin et al., “Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma: Five-Year Results,” Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: S35-S46. |
Franzino, “The Laprotek Surgical System and the Next Generation of Robotics,” Surg Clin North Am, 2003 83(6). |
Fraulob et al., “Miniature assistance module for robot-assisted heart surgery,” Biomed. Tech. 2002, 47 Suppl. 1, Pt. 1: 12-15. |
Fukuda et al., “Mechanism and Swimming Experiment of Micro Mobile Robot in Water,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994: 814-819. |
Fukuda et al., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1994, pp. 2290-2295. |
Fuller et al., “Laparoscopic Trocar Injuries: A Report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committe,” U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration, available at http://www.fdaJ:?;ov, Finalized: Nov. 7, 2003; Updated: Jun. 24, 2005, 11 pp. |
Grady, “Doctors Try New Surgery for Gallbladder Removal,” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2007, 3 pp. |
Guber et al., “Miniaturized Instrumetn Systems for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Therapy,” Biomedizinishe Technic. 2002, Band 47, Erganmngsband 1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140350574 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60949390 | Jul 2007 | US | |
60949391 | Jul 2007 | US | |
60990076 | Nov 2007 | US | |
61025346 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13329705 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14454035 | US | |
Parent | 12171413 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 13329705 | US |