Patent Grant
11296402
The present subject matter generally relates to methods, systems and apparatus to design, operate and manufacture wireless power and/or data transmission and/or communication systems, and more specifically, to methods, systems and apparatus to design, operate and manufacture a high efficiency structure for use in near-field wireless power and/or data transmission and/or communication systems.
In recent years, applications employing near-field wireless power and/or data transmission and/or communication systems, such as commercial electronics, medical systems, military systems, high frequency transformers, microelectronics including nanoscale power and/or data transfer or microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) thereof, industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band receivers, wireless sensing and the like, have been limited in achieving optimal performance because the antennas (also referred to as resonators) utilized in these systems have relatively low quality factors.
The relatively low quality factors of these wireless transmission and/or communication systems are mainly due to higher resistive losses caused by a phenomenon known as the “skin effect.” Generally, skin effect is the tendency of an alternating electric current (AC) to distribute itself within a conductor such that the current density is more predominant near the surface of the conductor with the remaining conductor body ‘unused’ relative to electrical current flow. The remaining conductor body is ‘unused’ relative to electrical current flow because the current density typically decays with distance therewithin away from the surface of the conductor. The electric current flows mostly near the surface, and is referred to as the “skin” of the conductor. The depth at which current flows from the surface is referred to as the “skin depth.” The “skin depth” then defines the electrical signal conducting path that is active in transmission and/or communication, while the conductor is defined as the body that is capable of conducting an electrical signal.
In systems employing wireless power and/or data transmission and/or communication, the skin effect phenomenon generally causes energy loss as current flows through the antenna wire and circuit. Higher resistive loss at high frequencies is a problem faced by most electronic devices or appliances. Skin effect becomes more prevalent when operating frequency increases. With higher frequencies, current that normally flows through the entire cross section of the wire forming the antenna becomes restricted to its surface. As a result, the effective resistance of the wire is similar to that of a thinner wire rather than of the actual diameter through which the current could be distributed. A wire exhibiting tolerable resistance for efficient performance at low frequency transitions into a wire of unacceptable resistance at high frequency. The transition from tolerable to unacceptable resistance translates into an inefficient power and/or data transmission and/or communication system that is unable to conduct an electrical signal as needed in particular applications. Additionally, today's antenna designs do not resolve these inefficiencies, and, in some cases, exacerbate the inefficiencies of a wireless power and/or data transmission and/or communication system. Although not exhaustive, typical applications limited by current antenna technology include, for example, radio frequency identification (RFID), battery charging and recharging, telemetry, sensing, communication, asset tracking, patient monitoring, data entry and/or retrieval and the like. Overheating of system components, rate and accuracy of data retrieval, rate of energy delivery, transmission distance constraints, and transmission misalignment limitations are other serious problems in wireless power and/or data transmission and/or communication applications.
In applications of Implanted Medical Devices (IMDs), such as pacemakers, defibrillators and neuromodulation or neuromuscular stimulation devices, there is a desire to minimize battery recharge time. Faster battery recharge time reduces, for example, patient duration of discomfort, inconvenience, and potential for injury. If antennas have less resistive losses, battery recharge could be accomplished from greater distances and with higher tolerance to antenna misalignment or disorientation without compromising performance. Precise orientation and alignment is known to be difficult to achieve, especially for obese patients. Additionally, and/or alternatively, if structures of smaller sizes can be designed and practically manufactured while maintaining the performance characteristics required for successful system operation, then the overall dimensions of IMD's could be decreased.
In RFID applications, such as supply chain management, product authenticity, and asset tracking, there is a need to increase read range, increase read rates, improve system reliability and improve system accuracy. At high frequency for example, read range is at most three feet which is generally insufficient for pallet tracking. Ultra high frequency readers enable greater read distances of eight to ten feet, however, they introduce other performance issues like signals that are reflected by metal or are absorbed by water, or display unreadable, null spots in read fields. Increased read range requires concentrated power to facilitate reflecting back the signal for better performance, hence, a more efficient structure could help solve these issues.
In applications requiring efficient low loss coils which need to maintain resonance under harsh conditions, conventional wire-based antennas could be deformed. It is well known that any deformation of the wire cross-section will lead to a change in inductance and possibly resistance, which in turn will change the resonance frequency of the antenna and consequently may increase overall system resistance. Improved methods of manufacturing these types of structures that reduce the potential for compromising deformation could eliminate this problem. The present teachings include methods of manufacture that include both rigid structure designs and fixed flexible structure designs.
Litz wires were developed, in part, in an attempt to address the issues discussed above. However, Litz wires are generally insufficient for use in high frequency applications, and are therefore generally not useful in applications having operating frequencies above about 3 MHz. A Litz wire is a wire consisting of a number of individually insulated magnet wires twisted or braided into a uniform pattern, so that each wire strand tends to take all possible positions in the cross-section of the entire conductor. This multi-strand configuration or Litz construction is designed to minimize the power losses exhibited in solid conductors due to “skin effect”. Litz wire constructions attempt to counteract this effect by increasing the amount of surface area without significantly increasing the size of the conductor. However, even properly constructed Litz wires exhibit some skin effect due to the limitations of stranding. Wires intended for higher frequency ranges generally require more strands of a finer gauge size than Litz wires of equal cross-sectional area but composed of fewer and larger strands. The highest frequency at which providers of Litz wires offer configurations capable of improving efficiencies is about 3 MHz. There is currently no solution for applications with operating frequencies beyond this 3 MHz maximum frequency limit.
Hence a need exists for an improved high efficiency structure design and method of manufacture that reduces the intrinsic resistive losses of the structure, and in particular reduces intrinsic resistive losses of the structure at high frequencies to achieve high quality factors.
The teachings herein alleviate one or more of the above noted problems of higher resistive losses at high frequencies resulting in lower quality factors by utilizing a multi-layer (ML) wire structure concept to increase the area of conductance therewithin. The multi-layer wire configuration results in a reduction of conductor loss and an increase in the quality factor of the structure. The present teachings apply to wireless transmission and/or communication for near-field energy transfer, power transfer, data transfer or combinations thereof. More specifically, the present teachings apply to wireless transmission and/or communication for near-field antennas, energy networks, power networks or data networks, including any and all combinations of such networks.
Wireless energy transfer or wireless power transmission is the transmission of electrical energy from a power source to an electrical load without interconnecting wires. For wireless transmission of energy, power or data, efficiency is a significant parameter, as the transmission signal must arrive at the receiver or receivers to make the system practical. The most common form of wireless transmission involving energy, power, or data transfer is carried out using induction followed by resonant magnetic induction. Other methods currently being considered include electromagnetic radiation, for example but not limited to, microwaves or lasers.
In addition, wireless energy reception or wireless power reception is the reception of electrical energy from a power source without interconnecting wires. For wireless reception of energy, power or data, efficiency is a significant parameter, as the reception of a signal must be received from a transmitter or transmitters to make the system practical. As such, the forms of wireless reception embodying energy, power or data can be carried out using direct induction, resonant magnetic induction as well as electromagnetic radiation in the form of microwaves or lasers. In addition, wireless energy may comprise harvested energy. For example harvested energy may comprise solar energy, kinetic energy, vibration based-energy harvesting, or thermal energy.
Furthermore, the embodiments of the present application are capable of wireless communication of electrical energy, electrical power and/or data without interconnecting wires. Wireless communication embodies the transmission and/or reception of electrical energy, electrical power or data either simultaneously or independently.
One aspect of the present teachings is a resonator for wireless power and/or data transfer or reception wherein resistive losses within the resonator are minimized by maximizing useful conductor cross-sectional area in a wire cross section. In one embodiment, the resonator mitigates the unwanted high frequency skin effect by introducing non-conducting dielectric layers within its wire, resulting in a structure that comprises layers of conducting material alternating with layers of non-conducting material. The structure effectively provides an increased number of surfaces each with its characteristic skin depth and all electrically, or otherwise, connected. The skin depth may range from approximately one-half of the conductor depth to about equal to the conductor depth. The conductor depth may be in the range of skin depth to twice the skin depth. However, depending on the available technology, costs, and application, the conductor depth may be as large as twenty times or more the skin depth.
The resonator may include a coil having at least one turn wherein the coil is made up of a multi-layer wire structure. The multi-layer wire structure may include a first and second conductive layer separated by a layer of insulating material. The conductive layers may have substantially the same thickness and/or depth, wherein the thickness and/or depth may be in the range of skin depth to twice the skin depth. However, depending on the available technology, costs, and application, the conductor thickness and/or depth may be as large as twenty times or more the skin depth. Each conductive layer may be electrically connected to each other using at least one method of interconnect, such as but not limited to a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet.
In another embodiment of the present teachings is an antenna for wireless power and/or data transfer or reception wherein resistive losses within the antenna are minimized by maximizing useful conductor cross-sectional area in a wire cross section. In an embodiment the present application incorporates the multi-layer structural design within an antenna configured to transmit or receive wireless energy and/or data. Specifically, the multi-layer structure may be incorporated as the antenna itself or, alternatively, may be positioned within an antenna housing.
The multi-layer structure improves antenna transmission and reception and alleviates one or more of the above noted problems of higher resistive losses at high frequencies that result in lower antenna quality factors. The antenna of the present application mitigates the unwanted high frequency skin effect by introducing non-conducting dielectric layers within its structure, resulting in a structure that comprises layers of conducting material alternating with layers of non-conducting material. In addition, as will be explained in more detail, the antenna of the present application may comprise a structure having a multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) design. The additional curved orientation of the multi-layer-multi-turn structure also minimizes resistive losses, particularly at high frequencies that results in lower antenna quality factors. Both the multi-layer and multi-layer-multi-turn structures of the antenna effectively provide for an increased number of surfaces each with its characteristic skin depth and all electrically, or otherwise, connected. The skin depth may be dimensioned to be about the same as or less than the conductor thickness. In an embodiment, the skin depth may range from approximately one-half of the conductor thickness to about equal to the conductor thickness.
The antenna may comprise the shape of a coil having at least one turn wherein the coil is made up of a multi-layer wire. The multi-layer wire may include a first and second conductive layer separated by a layer of insulating material. The conductive layers may have substantially the same thickness and/or depth, wherein the thickness and/or depth may be in the range of skin depth to twice the skin depth. Each conductive layer may be electrically connected to each other using at least one method of interconnect, such as but not limited to a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet.
One purpose of the non-conducting layer within the multi-layer structure is to insulate two different conducting layers. The most basic design of the non-conducting layer would ideally be as thin as the manufacturing process practically permits, while still providing sufficient insulating properties. For example, in PCB technology, the thickness of layers is dictated by the “core thickness” and the pre-preg thickness. In another design, the thickness of the non-conducting layer is selected to modify the electrical behavior of the structure.
The resonator or antenna may have a quality factor greater than 50. Preferably, the quality factor is greater than 350. Most preferably, the quality factor is greater than 600. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that systems requiring two resonators or two antennas may exhibit substantially similar quality factors. Also, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that systems requiring two resonators or two antennas wherein one of the resonators or antennas may exhibit a quality factor that is substantially different than the other. The quality factor selection for each resonator or antenna will depend on the application, the design specification for each and the intended use of each resonator or antenna. Additionally, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the quality factor of a resonator or an antenna may be dependent on the environment in which it is used, so, for example, a resonator or an antenna that has a quality factor of 100 in air, may only have a quality factor of 50 or lower when implanted in human or animal tissue or when it is packaged in a compact hand held device within a metallic environment. In any given environment, the MLMT structure of the present application described herein should outperform traditional resonators or antennas.
As a result, the reduction of losses in the wire and the significantly reduced internal resistance of the resonator or antenna could enable high efficiency, extended range, compact wireless systems that consume less energy, have longer run time and simplify operation without compromising events like overheating.
In one example, there is disclosed a structure for wireless transmission or wireless reception. The structure is designed to wirelessly transmit and/or receive electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and/or electrical power. In addition, the structure is capable of electronic data transmission. Furthermore, the structure is capable of transmitting and/or receiving a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power and electronic data together or separately. Moreover, the transmission of either or both of the electrical energy and data may be wirelessly transmitted at about the same or different frequencies. For example, electrical energy may be wirelessly transmitted at a first frequency while data may be wirelessly transmitted at a second frequency that is about the same or different than the first frequency. Furthermore, the wireless transmission of the electrical energy and electronic data may occur simultaneously or at different times or time intervals.
In addition, transmission or reception of the electrical energy or data by the antenna may be triggered or halted by an identification code. In this embodiment, an identification code is received by the antenna prior to wireless transmission of the electrical energy and/or data. In an embodiment, the identification code serves to provide a handshake or identification marker that helps ensure wireless transmission or reception to a specific antenna or antennas. In addition, the identification code may serve to activate or deactivate an antenna. The identification code may also signal that the transmission or reception of data or electrical energy is forthcoming and may provide parameters about a future transmission, such as size, duration, or time. The identification code may include, but is not limited to, a data signal, an alpha numeric string, a binary code, an amount of electrical power, an electrical voltage, an electrical current or combinations thereof. Furthermore, the identification code may be transmitted at a specific sequence, frequency, frequencies or time interval such that the identification code is a unique.
The multi-layer structure of the resonator or antenna may comprise a plurality of conductor layers, an insulator layer separating each of the conductor layers, and at least one connector connecting two or more of the conductor layers. Each of the plurality of conductor layers may have at least one turn and may further be placed in a parallel orientation. Each conductor layer may be formed from an electrically conductive material. The electrically conductive material may be comprised of copper, Aluminum, titanium, platinum and platinum/iridium alloys, tantalum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, nitinol, Co—Cr—Ni alloys, stainless steel, gold, a gold alloy, palladium, carbon, silver, a noble metal or a biocompatible material and any combination thereof. The conductor layer may have a cross-sectional shape, such as, but not limited to, a circular cross-section, a rectangular cross-section, a square cross-section, a triangular cross-section, or an elliptical cross-section. The connector connecting the conductor layers may be but is not limited to a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet.
The MLMT structure may have structural shape, such as but not limited to a circular solenoidal configuration, a square solenoidal configuration, a circular spiral configuration, a square spiral configuration, a rectangular configuration, a triangular configuration, a circular spiral-solenoidal configuration, a square spiral-solenoidal configuration, and a conformal solenoid configuration. Other configurations may be used to modify the electrical properties of the structure, or to conform to the space available on a specific device
An electrical resistance in the MLMT structure may be reduced when an electrical signal is induced in the resonator or antenna at a frequency. The frequency may be selected from a frequency range from about 100 kHz to about 10 GHz. Further, the frequency may be a frequency band that ranges from or is within about 100 kHz to about 10 GHz. The electrical signal may be an electrical current, an electrical voltage, a digital data signal or any combination thereof.
The resonator or antenna may comprise a plurality of conductors, each conductor having a conductor length, a conductor height, a conductor depth, and a conductive surface having a skin depth. The skin depth may range from approximately one-half of the conductor depth to about equal to the conductor depth. The conductor depth may be in the range of skin depth to twice the skin depth. However, depending on the available technology, costs, and application, the conductor depth may be as large as twenty times or more the skin depth. The plurality of conductor layers may have at least one turn. Further, each of the plurality of conductor layers may or may not have substantially the same conductor length, conductor height, or conductor depth. The conductor layers may be formed from an electrically conductive material. The electrically conductive material may be comprised of copper, aluminum, titanium, platinum and platinum/iridium alloys, tantalum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, nitinol, Co—Cr—Ni alloys, stainless steel, gold, a gold alloy, palladium, carbon, silver, a noble metal or a biocompatible material and any combination thereof.
The plurality of conductors may be arranged to form a resonator body. The resonator body may have a resonator body length, a resonator body width and a resonator body depth. When an electrical signal is induced through the resonator body, the electrical signal propagates through the conducting surface of skin depth. The electrical signal may be an electrical current, an electrical voltage, a digital data signal or any combination thereof. Similarly, the plurality of conductors may be arranged to form an antenna body. The antenna body may have an antenna body length, an antenna body width and an antenna body depth. When an electrical signal is induced through the antenna body, the electrical signal propagates through the conducting surface of skin depth. The electrical signal may be an electrical current, an electrical voltage, a digital data signal or any combination thereof.
The plurality of conductors in the resonator or antenna may comprise a first conductor layer and a second conductor layer separated by an insulator layer wherein the first conductor layer is connected to the second conductor layer or more by at least one connector. The conductor may have a cross-sectional shape, such as but not limited to a circular cross-section, a rectangular cross-section, a square cross-section, a triangular cross-section, or an elliptical cross-section. The resonator or antenna may have a structural shape such as but not limited to a circular solenoidal, a square solenoidal configuration, a circular spiral configuration, a square spiral configuration, a rectangular configuration, a triangular configuration, a circular spiral-solenoidal configuration, a square spiral-solenoidal configuration, or a conformal solenoid configuration.
There is also disclosed a circuit for wireless transmission or wireless reception. The circuit is designed to wirelessly transmit and/or receive electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and electrical power. In addition, the circuit is capable of electronic data transmission. Furthermore, the circuit is capable of transmitting a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power and electronic data together or separately. In addition, the circuit may be configured to receive or prepare the identification code for transmission. The circuit may activate or de-activate the antenna as well as control the operation of the antenna so that a specific amount of energy or data is transmitted or received. Furthermore, the circuit may be used to control the frequency, time interval or sequence at which electrical energy and/or data is transmitted or received.
Circuits at high frequencies extensively use passive elements such as inductors, capacitors, and the like. Some examples of such circuit configurations include but are not limited to band pass, high pass and low pass filters; mixer circuits (e.g., Gilbert Cell); oscillators such as Colpitts, Pierce, Hartley, and clap; and, amplifiers such as differential, push pull, feedback, and radio-frequency (RF). Specifically, inductors are used in matching and feedback in low noise amplifiers (LNAs) as a source degeneration element. Lumped inductors are also essential elements in RF circuits and monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs). Lumped inductors are used in on-chip matching networks where transmission line structures may be of excessive length. Often, they are also used as RF chokes allowing bias currents to be supplied to circuits while providing broad-band high impedance at RF frequencies and above. RF MEMS switches, matching networks and varactors that are ideal for reconfigurable networks, antennas and subsystems also need high Q inductors. Note, passive circuit element and lumped element, such as lumped inductor, may be used interchangeably with passive circuit element being the broader term. The passive circuit element may be an inductor, a capacitor, a resistor or just a wire. In nearly all the above mentioned circuit examples, not meant to be limiting, it is desired that the passive components are minimally lossy.
Given circuits at high frequencies extensively use passive elements such as inductors and capacitors, an embodiment is given using but is not limited to an inductor. Specifically considering an inductor, the designs should be such that maximum Q is attained while achieving the desired inductance value. In other words, the resistive loss in the inductor needs to be minimized. Depending on the frequency of operation, available area on the substrate, the application and the technology, the inductor can be implemented as, but not limited to, a TEM/transmission line, a conductive loop, or a spiral/solenoid/combination structure of several shapes, for example, but not limited to, a circle, a rectangle, an ellipsoid, a square, or an irregular configuration. All these embodiments, not meant to be limiting, may be realized using the multi-layer structure in the present application.
In another example, a resonator as part of a larger circuit is discussed. A resonator is a device or a system that exhibits resonance (i.e., oscillates) at specific frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s), called the resonance frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s). At the resonance frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s), there is minimum impedance to oscillation. In the context of electrical circuits, there is minimum electrical impedance at the resonance frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s). The MLMT structure of the present invention may act as a resonator under two fundamental conditions: (1) When the MLMT structure is designed to resonate at a specific frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s), in its environment without any additional electrical components; (2) When the MLMT structure is designed to resonate at a specific frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s), in its environment in combination with other components (for example, but not limited to, a capacitor, a capacitor bank, a capacitor and/or an inductor network). Thus, the resonator may be part of a larger circuit, and the resonance behavior may be designed to occur at a frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s), or at a frequency, frequencies, or frequency band(s) with a certain bandwidth or certain bandwidths. Additional components (e.g., resistance) may also be added to alter the bandwidth(s).
There is also disclosed a system for wireless transmission or wireless reception. The system is designed to wirelessly transmit and/or receive electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and electrical power. In addition, the system is capable of electronic data transmission. Furthermore, the system is capable of transmitting a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power and electronic data together or separately.
The system may comprise a first resonator or antenna comprising a plurality of first conductors, each first conductor having a first conductor length, a first conductor height, a first conductor depth, and a first conductive surface having a first skin depth. The plurality of first conductors may be arranged to form a first resonator body or first antenna body having a first resonator body length or first antenna length, a first resonator body width or first antenna body width and a first resonator body depth or first antenna body depth. The system may also comprise a second resonator or antenna comprising a plurality of second conductors, each second conductor having a second conductor length, a second conductor height, a second conductor depth, and a second conductive surface having a second skin depth. The plurality of second conductors may be arranged to form a second resonator body or second antenna body having a second resonator body length or second antenna body length, a second resonator body width or second antenna body width and a second resonator body depth or second antenna body depth. The first skin depth and the second skin depth may be dimensioned to be less than or about equal to its respective conductor depth. In an embodiment, the first skin depth and the second skin depth may be dimensioned to be approximately one-half of the conductor depth to about equal to the conductor depth of the respective conductor depth. The first and second conductors may have at least one turn and each of the plurality of first and second conductor layers may or may not have substantially the same conductor length, conductor height, and conductor depth. The first conductor depth and the second conductor depth may be dimensioned to be in the range of skin depth to twice the skin depth. However, depending on the available technology, costs, and application, the first conductor depth and the second conductor depth may be dimensioned to be as large as twenty times or more the skin depth. The first and second conductor layers may be formed from an electrically conductive material such as, but not limited to, copper, Aluminum, titanium, platinum and platinum/iridium alloys, tantalum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, nitinol, Co—Cr—Ni alloys, stainless steel, gold, a gold alloy, palladium, carbon, silver, a noble metal or a biocompatible material and any combination thereof.
When an electrical signal is propagated through the first resonator body or first antenna body, the electrical signal propagates through the first conducting surface of skin depth and further induces an electrical signal through the second resonator body. The induced electrical signal propagates through the second conducting surface at skin depth. The electrical signal may be an electrical current, an electrical voltage, and a digital data signal, or combinations thereof.
The plurality of first conductors may comprise a first conductor layer and a second conductor layer separated by an insulator layer wherein the first conductor layer is connected to the second conductor layer or more by at least one connector. The connector connecting the conductor layers may be, but is not limited to, a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet. The first conductor may have a first cross-sectional shape and the second conductor may have a second cross-sectional shape. The first and the second cross-sectional shapes are non-limiting and may be one of a circular cross-section, a rectangular cross-section, a square cross-section, a triangular cross-section, or an elliptical cross-section.
The first resonator or first antenna may have a first structural shape and the second resonator or second antenna may have a second structural shape. The first and the second structural shapes are non-limiting and may be a circular solenoidal configuration, a square solenoidal configuration, a circular spiral configuration, a square spiral configuration, a rectangular configuration, a triangular configuration, a circular spiral-solenoidal configuration, a square spiral-solenoidal configuration, or a conformal solenoid configuration.
In addition, there is disclosed a method for manufacturing a structure for wireless transmission or wireless reception. The method of manufacturing creates the multi-layer (ML) or multi-layer-multi-turn (MLMT) structure of the present application that is capable of wirelessly transmitting and/or receiving electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and electrical power. In addition, the resulting structure is capable of electronic data transmission or reception. Furthermore, the resulting structure is capable of transmitting and/or receiving a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power and electronic data together or separately.
The method may comprise the steps of creating a plurality of conductor layers having an insulator between each of the conductor layers and forming at least one connection between two of the plurality of conductors. The connector connecting the conductor layers may be but is not limited to a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet. The conductor layers may be created by depositing through a mask. The step of creating a plurality of conductor layers having an insulator between each of the conductor layers may further include the steps of placing a first conductive layer on top of a second conductive layer and separating the first conductive layer from the second conductive layer with a first insulator. Further, the step of forming at least one connection between two of the plurality of conductors may include the steps of connecting at least two of the conductive layers comprising but not limited to a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet. The conductor layers may be formed from an electrically conductive material. The electrically conductive material may be comprised of copper, titanium, platinum and platinum/iridium alloys, tantalum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, nitinol, Co—Cr—Ni alloys, stainless steel, gold, a gold alloy, palladium, carbon, silver, a noble metal or a biocompatible material and any combination thereof.
There is also disclosed a method for operating a structure to provide wireless transmission or wireless reception, such the multi-layer or multi-layer-multi-turn structure of the present application. The method comprises the steps of providing a structure that is capable of wireless transmission and/or wireless reception of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and/or electrical power. In addition, the method provides the steps of providing a structure that is capable of electronic data transmission or reception. Furthermore, the method provides the steps of providing a structure that is capable of transmitting and/or receiving a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power and electronic data together or separately.
The method comprises the steps of providing a plurality of conductors, each conductor having a conductor length, a conductor height, a conductor depth, and a conductive surface having a skin depth. Further, the method comprises the steps of providing the skin depth to range approximately one-half of the conductor depth to about equal to the conductor depth. The conductor depth may be in the range of skin depth to twice the skin depth. However, depending on the available technology, costs, and application, the conductor depth may be as large as twenty times or more the skin depth. The plurality of conductors may be arranged to form a resonator body having a resonator body length, a resonator body width and a resonator body depth; and, inducing an electrical signal in at least one of the plurality of conductors such that the electrical signal propagates through the conducting surface of the skin depth. The electrical signal may be an electrical current, an electrical voltage, a digital data signal or any combination thereof.
The method may also include the step of providing a second plurality of conductors, each of the second conductors having a second conductor length, a second conductor height, a second conductor depth, and a second conductive surface having a second skin depth wherein the plurality of second conductors are arranged to form a second resonator body having a second resonator body length, a second resonator body width and a second resonator body depth. When an electrical signal is propagated through the resonator body, the electrical signal propagates through the conducting surface of the skin depth and further induces an electrical signal through the second resonator body, and the induced electrical signal propagates through the second conducting surface at the second skin depth.
The plurality of conductors may comprise a first conductor layer and a second conductor layer separated by an insulator layer wherein the first conductor layer is connected to the second conductor layer by at least one connector. Further, the at least one connection connecting at least two of the conductive layers comprises but is not limited to a via, a solder, a tab, a wire, a pin, or a rivet. The conductor may have a cross-sectional shape not limited to a circular cross-section, a rectangular cross-section, a square cross-section, a triangular cross-section, and an elliptical cross-section. The plurality of conductor layers may have at least one turn and each of the plurality of conductor layers may or may not have substantially the same conductor length, conductor height, and conductor depth. The conductor layer may be formed from an electrically conductive material. The electrically conductive material may be comprised of copper, aluminum, titanium, platinum and platinum/iridium alloys, tantalum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, nitinol, Co—Cr—Ni alloys, stainless steel, gold, a gold alloy, palladium, carbon, silver, a noble metal or a biocompatible material or any combination thereof.
The resonator may have a structural shape not limited to a circular solenoidal configuration, a square solenoidal configuration, a circular spiral configuration, a square spiral configuration, a rectangular configuration, a triangular configuration, a circular spiral-solenoidal configuration, a square spiral-solenoidal configuration, and a conformal solenoid configuration. Additional advantages and novel features will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following and the accompanying drawings or may be learned by production or operation of the examples. The advantages of the present teachings may be realized and attained by practice or use of various aspects of the methodologies, instrumentalities and combinations set forth in the detailed examples discussed below.
The drawing figures depict one or more implementations in accord with the present teachings, by way of example only, not by way of limitation. In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and/or circuitry have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
The various technologies disclosed herein generally relate to methods, systems and apparatus to design, operate and manufacture wireless transmission and/or wireless reception systems, and more specifically, to methods, systems and apparatus to design, operate and manufacture a high efficiency structure for use in near-field wireless transmission and/or reception.
Wireless transmission may embody wireless transmission of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and electrical power such as the embodiments. In addition, wireless transmission may embody the transmission of digital data and information. In a further embodiment, a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power, electronic data and information may be transmitted together or separately such as the embodiments discussed in energy networks. It is further contemplated that such wireless transmission could occur at the same time or over a period of time intervals. Moreover, the electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power, and electronic data can be wirelessly transmitted simultaneously between a transmitting structure, such as a first transmitting antenna, and a second structure, such as a second receiving antenna, at a frequency that is substantially similar or different. In an embodiment, electrical energy and/or data may be transmitted at a frequency or multiple frequencies that may range from about 10 kHz to about 10 GHz. Furthermore, wireless transmission may comprise near field electromagnetic coupling or far field electromagnetic coupling. In general, near field electromagnetic coupling encompasses frequencies between about 10 kHz to about 50 MHz and far field electromagnetic coupling generally comprises frequencies that are greater than 50 MHz. In a preferred embodiment, far field electromagnetic coupling generally comprises frequencies that may range from about 50 MHz to about 10 GHz. Preferred far field electromagnetic coupling frequencies include, but are not limited to, 6.78 MHz and 13.56 MHz, frequencies utilized in near field communication, 433 MHz, a frequency utilized in medical devices, 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz, frequencies used for cellular phone communication and 2.4 GHz, a frequency utilized by Bluetooth® and Wi-Fi communications. The lower frequencies of near field magnetic coupling typically provide data transmission having a relatively low data transfer rate while the higher frequencies of far field magnetic coupling generally provide increased data transfer rates.
In an embodiment wireless transmission may comprise in-bound or out-bound data transmission, which is also referred to as “signaling”. During inbound data transmission or signaling, information is transferred between a source and a target destination using about the same frequency as that used to transfer electrical energy. In outbound data transmission or signaling, information is transmitted at a frequency that is different than the frequency used to transmit electrical energy. In bound signaling generally utilizes a frequency that is less than 50 MHz, more preferably a frequency that ranges from about 10 kHz to about 50 MHz. This is because wireless electrical power transfer generally utilizes near field magnetic coupling which typically operates at a frequency in the 10 kHz to about 50 MHz range. Out-bound signaling, on the other hand, may utilize either near field magnetic coupling or far field electromagnetic coupling.
Further embodiments of wireless transmission are discussed in the energy networks, power networks, data networks and near-field power and data transfer system sections below. As defined herein “data” is information, facts, or knowledge that may be encoded as letters and/or numbers that represent the data. Data may be encoded in a variety of unlimited ways such as, but limited to, a digital or analog format, an alphanumeric string, a binary code, or an ASCII code. In an embodiment, “data” that is wirelessly transmitted comprises a series or sequence of electrical voltages, electrical currents or combinations thereof that is transmitted at a particular frequency or frequencies. In a preferred embodiment, data may be transmitted by a unique sequence of electrical voltages, electrical currents, or combinations thereof that comprises an electrical signature. This transmitted electrical signature can be interpreted as data. In addition, the electrical signature may be demodulated at the receiving end by a receiving antenna or electrical circuit such that the data may be encoded into letters and/or numbers that represent the data that was wirelessly transmitted.
Wireless reception may embody reception of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and electrical power. In addition, wireless reception may embody the reception of digital data and information. In a further embodiment, a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power, electronic data and information may be received together or received separately such as the embodiments discussed in energy networks. It is further contemplated that such wireless reception could occur at the same time or over a period of time intervals. Further embodiments of wireless reception are discussed in the energy networks, power networks, data networks and near-field power and data transfer system sections below. In addition, transmission of electrical energy and/or data may be programmed to occur simultaneously or at different times or time intervals. Moreover, the transmission of electrical energy and/or electronic data may be programmed to occur at substantially similar or different frequencies. For example, the transmission of electrical power between a first transmitting antenna and a second receiving antenna may be specified that an amount of electrical power is transmitted at 5 GHz at 3 pm while a data signal is transmitted at 2 GHz at 3 pm and at 5 pm.
Wireless communication may embody wireless transmission and reception of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, and electrical power such as the embodiments. In addition, wireless communication may embody the transmission and reception of digital data and information. In a further embodiment, a combination of electrical energy, electromagnetic energy, electrical power, electronic data and information may be transmitted and received together or transmitted and received separately such as the embodiments discussed in energy networks. It is further contemplated that such wireless transmission and reception could occur at the same time or over a period of time intervals. Further embodiments of wireless communication are discussed in the energy networks, power networks, data networks and near-field power and data transfer system sections below.
An antenna is generally a conductor by which electromagnetic energy are sent out or received. An antenna may consist of, but is not limited to, a wire or a set of wires. A resonator is generally any device or material that resonates, including any system that resonates. A resonator may be an instrument for detecting the presence of a particular frequency by means of resonance, and may also be any circuit having this frequency characteristic. Further, a resonator may be an electrical circuit that combines capacitance and inductance in such a way that a periodic electric oscillation will reach maximum amplitude. As appreciated by those skilled in the art, antennas often act as resonators when, for example, they self resonate or when they are coupled with another reactive element such as a capacitor to achieve resonance. As such, the terms antenna and resonator are often used interchangeably herein, and are also referred to generically as a structure (e.g., multi-layer multi-turn structure).
“Skin effect” is generally the tendency for an alternating current to concentrate near the outer part or “skin” of a conductor. As illustrated in
With an alternating current, the current is displaced more and more to the surface as the frequency increases. This current does not effectively utilize the full cross section of the conductor. The conductor's effective cross section is therefore reduced so the resistance and energy dissipation are increased compared with the values for a uniformly distributed current. In other words, as illustrated in
The effective resistance of a wire rises significantly with frequency. In a preferred embodiment, this frequency may range from about 100 kHz to about 3 MHz and more preferably from about 3 MHz to about 10 GHz. In an embodiment necessitating large antenna construction operating at 120 KHz, it may even be beneficial to create a MLMT structure using large gauge wires/materials to achieve efficient performance.
For a copper wire of 1-mm (0.04-in.) diameter for example, the resistance at a frequency of 1 MHz is almost four times the dc value. “Skin depth” or “penetration depth” δ is frequently used in assessing the results of skin effect. It is generally accepted that the depth below the conductor surface at which the current density has decreased to about 1/e (approximately 37%) of its value at the surface. The term “skin depth” is therefore described as the depth within the cross-section where the current density has dropped to about 37% of the maximum. This concept applies to plane solids, but can be extended to other shapes provided the radius of curvature of the conductor surface is appreciably greater than δ. For example, at a frequency of 60 Hz the penetration depth in copper is 8.5 mm (0.33 in.); at 10 GHz it is only 6.6×1−0-7 m. The skin depth is a strong function of frequency and decreases with increasing frequency. This phenomenon is displayed in the graph shown in
The fundamental concept of the multi-layer wire is to maximize the available current density over the full wire cross-section thereby reducing the wire's intrinsic resistance. By using a conductive layer whose thickness is about twice the skin depth, it is ensured that the current density at all points in the wire is greater than or equal to ˜37% of the maximum possible current density (at surface). By using other layer thicknesses, a different base current density will be obtained. For example, by using a layer thickness of about 4 times the skin depth, it will be ensured that current density is greater than or equal to ˜14% of the maximum possible current density (at surface). Similarly, for conductor depth approximately 6 times the skin depth, the current density is greater than or equal to 5%.
While it is important to keep a high current density in the conductive layers, at the same time, it is essential that the unused cross-sectional area, i.e., the insulating layer, be as small as possible overall. Using the above theory, an ideal proposed configuration for a multilayer wire includes conductive layers with thickness/depth about twice the skin depth, and an insulating layer, as thin as technologically possible. To those skilled in the art it will be understood that MLMT structures may result in embodiments wherein the skin depth, which is the conductive area active in wireless communication, ranges from approximately one-half of the conductor depth to about equal to the conductor depth. On the other hand, given limitations imposed by some fabrication methods, designing MLMT structures may also result in embodiments wherein the conductor depth, which is the area capable of conducting a signal but not necessarily fully utilized as operating frequencies increase, ranges from skin depth to about twice the skin depth.
Wave-guide and resonant cavity internal surfaces for use at microwave frequencies are therefore frequently plated with a high-conductivity material, such as silver, to reduce the energy losses since nearly all the current is concentrated at the surface. Provided the plating material is thick compared to δ, the conductor is as good as a solid conductor of the coating material. “Quality factor” is generally accepted as an index (figure of measure) that measures the efficiency of an apparatus like an antenna, a circuit, or a resonator. Via is defined herein as an electrically conductive connection from one layer to another.
A Litz wire is generally a wire constructed of individual film insulated wires bunched or braided together in a uniform pattern of twists and length of lay.
Reference now is made in detail to the examples illustrated in the accompanying drawings and discussed below.
For each antenna, there exists an optimum number of connectors and an optimum location for each connector. Since there is no closed-form analytical solution for these, the optimal locations may best be obtained through iterative modeling. However, basic guidelines for optimizing are given herewithin:
Vias can be of the form commonly used in printed circuit board (PCB) technologies (for example, through-hole, buried, blind) or those utilized in semiconductor or MEMS technology. Alternatively, the via can be, but is not limited to, any conductive material that is laser-welded, welded, printed, soldered, brazed, sputtered deposited, wire-bonded and the like in order to electrically connect at least any two layers and/or all layers.
The coil 100 of
In general, for any inductive antenna, the inductance increases as Tx, while the resistance increases as Ty, where T is the number of turns. In ideal conductors, x and y are 2 and 1 respectively. There are other factors which affect the inductance and resistance (hence the quality factor) which calls for x and y to be less than 2 and 1 respectively. Referring to
The multi-layer wire 101 in
An insulating material 430 separates the first layer 410 from the second layer 420. The first layer 410 and second layer 420 are connected with vias 440 which traverse the insulating material 430. The conductive layers 410, 420 may be layers of conductive tape/ribbon/sheet/leaf or deposited metal having a metal thickness and metal strip width. The metal thickness of the first layer 410 is identified by line A-A and the metal strip width of the first layer 410 is identified by line B-B. In one example, the metal thickness of a layer may be approximately twice the skin depth. The skin depth may range from approximately one-half of the conductor depth to about equal to the conductor depth Each layer in a turn will have substantially the same metal thickness and metal strip width.
The thickness of the insulating material may be sufficient to meet the needs of the application or equal to the minimum thickness possible by the available fabrication technology. Additionally, the overall structure feasibility depends on the frequency of operation (as shown in the graph of
Typical PCB stackup comprises alternating layers of the core and the pre-preg. The core generally comprises a thin piece of dielectric with copper foil bonded on both sides. The core dielectric is generally cured fiberglass-epoxy resin. The pre-preg is generally uncured fiberglass-epoxy resin. The pre-preg will cure (i.e., harden) when heated and pressed. The outermost layers are generally pre-preg with copper foil bonded to the outside (surface foils). Stackup is generally symmetric about the center of the board in the vertical axis to avoid mechanical stress in the board under thermal cycling as shown in
One embodiment wherein the conductor and insulating layer thicknesses are equal to the minimum thickness possible by the available fabrication technology is given for an application at 13.56 MHz. At 13.56 MHz, the skin depth is about 17.8 micrometers. Ideally, the conductor depth should be about 35.6 micrometers and the insulation thickness should be as small as possible. As shown in
Similarly, the dielectric layer could be made from several materials, and can be of various configurations. For example, some applications may require extremely low parasitic capacitance. In such cases, a non-conducting dielectric with the lowest possible permittivity is preferred. Additionally, it may be desired to increase the insulating layer thickness to minimize the parasitic effects. Another example would be for applications that might require ferrite materials to increase inductance and/or increase magnetic shielding. In such cases, the dielectric layers might be replaced by a ferrite film/block or similar propertied configuration/material.
It will be apparent to one skilled in the art, therefore, that the insulating material will be of a thickness such that the thickness is within the practical capabilities of the manufacturing technology used to manufacture that resonator and compatible with the efficiency needs of the application for which the resonator is intended.
The material of the conductive layers may be copper or gold, however, other materials are possible. To enhance conductivity, copper or gold with a layer of deposited silver may also be used. In the case where the antenna is implanted and may be exposed to body fluids, then the typically known biocompatible materials should be utilized, including additions for enhancing conductivity. These may include, but are not limited to, conductive material taken from the group of: titanium, platinum and platinum/iridium alloys, tantalum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, nitinol, Co—Cr—Ni alloys such as MP35N, Havar®, Elgiloy®, stainless steel, gold and its various alloys, palladium, carbon, or any other noble metal. Depending on the application, the insulating material may be (i) air, (ii) a dielectric with a low permittivity (such as, for example, Styrofoam, silicon dioxide, or any suitable biocompatible ceramic), (iii) a non-conductive dielectric with a high permittivity, (iv) a ferrite material, or (v) a combination of the materials listed above. The choice of material or combination of materials may result from factors such as the fabrication process, cost and technical requirements. For example, if a high capacitive effect is required to affect a lower self-resonance frequency of an antenna, a high permittivity dielectric might be preferred, or, a combination of materials including a ferrite film or ferrite block might be preferred to increase the self-inductance of the antenna. In addition, the use of a ferrite core may be used to provide increased performance.
As will be described herein, the antenna is preferably designed with a high quality factor (QF) to achieve efficient transfer of power that reduces intrinsic resistive losses of the antenna at high frequencies. The quality factor is the ratio of energy stored by a device to the energy lost by the device. Thus, the QF of an antenna is the rate of energy loss relative to the stored energy of the antenna. A source device carrying a time-varying current, such as an antenna, possesses energy which may be divided into three components: 1) resistive energy (Wres), 2) radiative energy (Wrad), and 3) reactive energy (Wrea). In the case of antennas, energy stored is reactive energy and energy lost is resistive and radiative energies, wherein the antenna quality factor is represented by the equation Q=Wrea/(Wres+Wrad).
In near field communications, radiative and resistive energies are released by the device, in this case the antenna, to the surrounding environment. When energy must be transferred between devices having limited power stores, e.g., battery powered devices having size constraints, excessive power loss may significantly reduce the devices' performance effectiveness. As such, near-field communication devices are designed to minimize both resistive and radiative energies while maximizing reactive energy. In other words, near-field communications benefit from maximizing Q.
By example, the efficiency of energy and/or data transfer between devices in an inductively coupled system is based on the quality factor of the antenna in the transmitter (Q1), the quality factor of the antenna in the receiver (Q2), and the coupling coefficient between the two antennas (κ). The efficiency of the energy transfer varies according to the following relationship: eff ∝ κ2 ●Q1Q2. A higher quality factor indicates a lower rate of energy loss relative to the stored energy of the antenna. Conversely, a lower quality factor indicates a higher rate of energy loss relative to the stored energy of the antenna. The coupling coefficient (κ) expresses the degree of coupling that exists between two antennas.
Further, by example, the quality factor of an inductive antenna varies according to the following relationship:
where f is the frequency of operation, L is the inductance, and R is the total resistance (ohmic+radiative). As QF is inversely proportional to the resistance, a higher resistance translates into a lower quality factor.
A higher quality factor may be achieved using multiple layers in a multi-layer wire for a single turn of coil. Increasing the number of turns in a coil may also be used to increase the quality factor of the structure. For a design at a constant frequency, there may be an optimum number of layers to reach a maximum quality factor. Once this maxima is reached, the quality factor may decrease as more layers are added. The design variables that may be used for the multi-layer multi-turn structure include:
Below, exemplary multi-layer multi-turn designs based on the above parameters will be described.
In one example, the antenna may be a single turn circular coil having multi-layer wire, as illustrated in
To demonstrate benefits of the present teachings vis-à-vis the prior art solutions, models of the present teachings were developed to compare with known coils. The prior art models were assumed to be made using solid wire. For a circular coil with radius r; wire radius, a; turns, N; inductance (L) and resistance (Rohmic and Rradiation) as given by the following equations:
Two antenna configurations were considered, the specifics of which are provided in the Table 1 and Table 2 below. The results indicate that the present teachings allow for significantly higher QF's than the solid wire. The performance improvement shown herein applies when other known methods of construction are utilized.
It is also understood that the metal strip width may be increased to achieve a higher quality factor.
In another example, the antenna may be a single turn circular coil of multi-layer wire and may have a metal strip width of approximately 1 mm, a metal thickness of approximately 0.01 mm, an insulating layer of approximately 0.005 mm, and an outer radius of approximately 5 mm. The wire may have between 16 and 128 layers, such as 16, 32, 64, or 128 layers. However it is understood that the wire may have less than 16 or more than 128 layers in order to achieve a high quality factor. The corresponding coil thickness for the range of 16 to 128 layers may be between approximately 0.25 mm to 2 mm, such as for example, 0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 mm, respectively. In this example, the quality factor improves with increasing the number of layers, with larger quality factors achieved at higher frequencies. For example, at a frequency of 10 MHz, the quality factor for 16, 32, 64 and 128 layers is approximately 127, 135, 140 and 185, respectively. The peak quality factor increases to nearly 2900 at approximately 450 MHz under these design parameters. The relative resistance may be lowest around the frequency at which the conductor thickness is about twice the skin depth. In this example, that frequency is 160 MHz.
In yet another example, all design parameters are the same as in the preceding example for a 32 layer wire, except the number of turns is doubled, resulting in a double turn circular coil. The inductance and resistance for this 32 layer, double turn antenna increase between 3-3.5 times and 1.7-3 times, respectively, over the 32 layer, single turn antenna in the frequency range of 1 MHz to 200 MHz.
As noted above, an antenna may display parasitic effects. Associated with the antenna is a parasitic capacitance that is frequency dependent and whose contribution to the overall impedance increases with frequency. As a result of the parasitic capacitance, there exists a self-resonance frequency for the antenna beyond which the antenna behaves like a capacitor. To prevent the onset of parasitic capacitance, the antenna may be designed such that the inductance is nearly unchanging around the frequency of operation. Preferably, the slope of the reactance versus frequency graph is nearly linear (around the frequency of operation) with slope, ∂X/∂ω˜L (where X is the reactance, and L is the inductance that was designed for). Operating the antenna in this regime ensures that the parasitic coupling via electric fields is kept to a minimum. It is understood that that the X versus ω may not be perfectly linear due to other effects such as current crowding, proximity and skin effects.
It is also contemplated that other designs may be used for the antenna in order to achieve higher quality factors. For example, for a single turn circular coil of multi-layer wire that may have between 16 and 128 layers, such as 16, 32, 64, or 128 layers, the coil may include a metal strip width of approximately 1 mm, a metal thickness of approximately 0.01 mm, an insulating layer of approximately 0.01 mm, and an outer radius of approximately 10 mm. Increasing the width of the metal reduces the resistance and the inductance, resulting in a higher quality factor. Due to the overall large size of the antenna (outer radius ˜10 mm), the relatively small increase in the width (w) does not reduce the inductance. It should be noted that the same increase in metal width for a smaller antenna, such as, for example, with outer radius approximately 5 mm, the decrease in inductance would have been higher.
It should be noted that all the QF values mentioned above for the inductors are in free space (conductivity=0, relative permittivity=1). It is expected that the presence of a real world environment will affect the QF. For example, an antenna with a QF˜400 in free space, could have the QF change to about 200-300 when it is placed next to the human body. Further, if the antenna is placed inside the human body with little or no insulating coating, the QF might further change to less than 200. Applying a coating sufficiently thick or enclosing in a sufficiently large package before placing inside the human body might decrease the change in the QF of the antenna. It is expected that similar changes in QF characteristics will occur in any medium and in the proximity of any material, with the deviation from free space depending on the electrical properties of the material/medium and the distance from it.
As will be discuss herein, utilization of near-field communication for wireless transmission and/or reception can be applied to energy, power or data networks.
An energy transfer network may be developed according to the present teachings.
Each transmitting unit 12 includes a transmitting antenna 13. The transmitting antenna 13 has a resonant frequency w and preferably has minimal resistive and radiative losses. The load 16 may include driver circuitry to generate signals to drive the transmitting antenna 13. Based on the received signals, the transmitting antenna 13 may produce a near-field in all directions (omni-directional) or may produce a near-field targeted towards a specific direction (directional). The targeted near-field may be produced through shielding, such as by ferrite materials. Of course, it is understood to those skilled in the art that other materials may be used to provide targeted near-fields.
Each receiving unit 14 includes a receiving antenna 15. A single antenna may be used for both the receiving antenna 15 and the transmitting antenna 13 or a separate antenna may be used for the receiving antenna 15 and the transmitting antenna 13. Each antenna 13, 15 has a resonant frequency (referred to as ωa-ωd). If separate transmitting and receiving antenna are used, it is preferred that the resonant frequency of the receiving antenna 15 is equal to the resonant frequency of the transmitting antenna 13.
When a receiving unit 14 of one device 11 (e.g., receiving unit 14b of device 11b) is placed in the near-field of the transmitting unit 12 of another device 11 (e.g., transmitting unit 12a of device 11a), an electromagnetic field generated by the transmitting unit 12a will interact with the receiving unit 14b. If the resonant frequency of a receiving unit 14 (e.g., receiving unit 14b of device 11b having resonant frequency ωb) is the same as the resonant of the transmitting unit 12 (e.g., transmitting unit 14a of device 11a having resonant frequency ωa), the reactive electromagnetic fields of the transmitting unit 11a will induce an alternating current within the receiving unit 14b. The induced current may be used to provide power or convey data to load 16b. As a result, device 11b is able to absorb energy from device 11a. It is understood that any number of devices having a resonant frequency equal to the resonating frequency of the transmitting device (e.g., ωb) may be added to the near-field energy network and draw energy from the transmitting device, provided that the resonant frequency of the transmitting unit 12a is not significantly altered due to the loading effect of the added devices.
If the resonant frequency of a receiving unit 14 (e.g., receiving unit 14c of device 11c having resonant frequency ωc) is different than the resonant of the transmitting unit 12 (e.g., transmitting unit 12a of device 11a having resonant frequency ωa), the receiving unit 14c will have a high impedance to the transmitting unit 12a and will draw little energy from the transmitting unit 12a.
It is understood that the amount of energy transferred from a transmitting unit 12a to receiving unit 14c depends on many factors, including intrinsic losses in the transmitting unit 12a and receiving unit 14c and the transfer of energy to other devices such as receiving unit 14b. Also significant are the proximity of ωa and ωc and the width of the resonant bands in each device.
Many common everyday objects are conductive (e.g., steel cabinets, and automobiles) and will have frequency responses similar to receiving unit 14c in
A power transfer network may be developed according to the present teachings. As illustrated in
It is understood that it may not be possible to place all transmitting and receiving devices (e.g., 11b-11d) within the near-field of the transmitting unit 12a. As illustrated in
A data transfer network may be developed according to the present teachings. A network or system designed for data transfer would be similar to the power networks described previously, except that the signal transmitted by the transmitting devices in the network may be modulated time-varying signals which carry data. There are several possible general layouts for a data-network.
One example of a data network layout includes one or more receiving units (14b-d) placed within the near-field of a transmitting unit 12a. Each of the receiving units (14b-d) may be capable of communicating to the transmitting unit 12a and/or other receiving units 14. It is understood that receiving units which may be out of near-field of the transmitting unit 12 may be reached using one or more repeaters 18 in the manner described above. In another example, a receiving unit 14 may be placed far-field of the transmitting unit 12 and utilize the radiative field of the transmitting unit 12 for communication. Such far-field communication is achieved in a manner similar to far-field communication techniques known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The devices 11 within the networks may be designed to handle data-transfer in several ways. For example, the devices 11 and their antennas 13, 15 may be designed to (1) receive data only; (2) transmit data only; or (3) receive and transmit data, using either a shared antenna for receiving and transmitting or separate and dedicated antennas for receiving and transmitting. In addition, the devices 11 may be designed to handle both data- and power-transfer. In such situations, each device 11 may be designed to: (1) transfer data only; (2) transfer power only; (3) transfer data and power, where each device 11 may use any combination of sending/receiving data and sending/receiving power, each device 11 has a shared antenna for data- and power-transfer, or each device 11 has separate, dedicated antennas for data- and power-transfer.
Each transmitting unit 12 and/or receiving unit 14 may have an identification code (ID) that is unique to the transmitting or receiving unit 12, 14 or, alternatively, the transmitting or receiving antenna 13, 15. The ID acts as an identifier for a particular transmitting or receiving unit 12, 14 or antenna 13, 15 on the network or system and allows for the receiving unit or antenna 14, 15 to identify the other transmitting unit or antenna 12, 13 for communication therebetween. In addition, the identification code (ID) may enable or disable transmission of electrical energy and/or data between the transmitting and receiving units or antennas 12, 14, 13, 15. Examples of electronic identifiers or identification codes may include, but are not limited to, a data string, an alpha numeric string, an ASCII string, a binary code, an amount of electrical energy, an electrical voltage, an electrical current, or combinations thereof transmitted in a specific sequence, frequency and/or frequencies for a specific length of time and/or time interval(s). In an embodiment, the electronic identifier or identification code is a unique sequence of electrical voltages and/or electrical currents.
In an embodiment, the identification code serves to provide a handshake or identification marker that helps ensure wireless transmission or reception to a specific antenna or antennas 13, 15. In addition, the identification code may serve to activate or deactivate an antenna 13, 15. The identification code may also signal that the transmission or reception of data or electrical energy is forthcoming and may provide parameters about a future transmission, such as size, duration, or time. In an embodiment, the electronic identifier may comprise an alpha numeric string transmitted at a specific frequency and/or at a specific time or time interval. In addition, the unique identifier (ID) may comprise a specific sequence or combinations of electrical energy and/or data. In a further embodiment, the transmitter and/or the receiver may not transmit or receive data and/or electrical energy until a specific identification code is transmitted or received. For example, to initiate a data-transfer session, a transmitting device, such as an antenna, would identify a receiving device with its ID and begin communications using an initiation instruction. The data transfer could occur using a specified modulation scheme. Security protocols such as various encryption protocols may also be used to ensure that the data transferred by and stored in the devices are secure and not accessible to unauthorized devices which are not present in the designed network 10.
In addition, a circuit (not shown) may be electrically connected to either or both of the transmitting and receiving antennas 13, 15. In an embodiment, the circuit may be configured to receive or transmit the identification code. In addition, the circuit may prepare the identification code prior to transmission by the antenna. The circuit may activate or de-activate the antenna 13, 15 as well as control the operation of the antenna so that a specific amount of energy or data is transmitted or received. Furthermore, the circuit may be used to control the frequency, time interval or sequence at which electrical energy and/or data is transmitted or received.
Periodic data communication may occur between a transmitting unit 12 and one or more receiving units 14 or between a receiving unit 14 and one or more other receiving units 14. In transmitting unit-receiving unit communications, a transmitting unit 12 may identify a particular receiving unit 14 based on its ID and initiate a communication session. Alternative, a receiving unit 14 may identify a transmitting unit 12 based on its ID and initiate a communication session. The communication session may be terminated by either the transmitting unit 12 or the receiving unit 14.
In receiving unit-receiving unit communications, two receiving units 14 may connect directly with each other in direct communication. Alternatively, two receiving units 14 or antennas may connect with each other using the transmitting unit 12 as an intermediary. In such cases, each receiving unit 14 may connect to the transmitting unit 12 and the transmitting unit 12 would receive information from one receiving unit 14 and transmit it to the other receiving unit 14. In another alternative, two receiving units 14 may communicate using one or more repeaters 18 where the one or more repeaters 18 may receive a signal from a receiving unit 14 and transmit it to another receiving unit 14. The one or more repeaters 18 may be one or more stand-alone resonant antennae and may be independent of any circuitry.
The system and method illustrated in
As appreciated by the present teachings, near-field power and data transfer are derived from the same physical principles. When utilized together, near-field power and data transfer provide an opportunity to create a wide variety of systems. The following describes a general system for near-field power and data transfer.
A near field power and data network (also referred herein as a “NF-PDAT”) may consist of multiple transmitting and receiving units. For the sake of simplicity, a simpler network consisting of a single transmitting unit 12 and a single receiving unit 14 is considered. The following description follows the path of the energy as it is transferred from the transmitting unit 12 to the receiving unit 14 and to a load coupled to the receiving unit 14.
Initially, the energy needed to drive the PDAT network must be obtained from a primary source. The primary source may be a main 50/60 Hz wall socket, a standard battery, a rechargeable battery connectable to a wall socket, or a rechargeable battery with indirect recharging. A wall-socket is one preferred method of obtaining energy because of its abundance in this form. In the event a device cannot be connected a wall socket, or portability is a requirement, batteries may be used. In addition, rechargeable batteries may be used. Rechargeable batteries may be replenished when their stored energy falls below a capacity. It is known that recharging allows batteries to be sued in devices that would otherwise drain batteries too quickly, have too little space for batteries of an appropriate size, or have limited access for replacing the battery. A primary source of power, such as a wall socket or another battery may be used to replenish battery life in the rechargeable battery. In most devices, recharging is typically accomplished by connecting the battery to a wall socket for a short period of time (e.g., laptops and cell-phones). In some applications (e.g., implanted medical devices), direct attachment to a power cord is not possible. In such situations, indirect recharging methods, such as inductive coupling to an external power source, have been used. It is understood that recharging may be accomplished by other methods. For example, if there exists a clear line-of-sight between the energy source and the device, an optical link, laser, or highly-directive radio-frequency beam may be used to transfer energy.
Alternative sources of energy may be used to power the system or to provide energy for components within the system (such as recharging a battery). These may include the conversion of one form of energy into electrical energy. One such example is the conversion of kinetic energy into electrical energy. This may be accomplished by converting movement into energy. For instance, a device attached to the body may use body movements to spin a rotor that causes a generator to produce an alternating current. Another example is the conversion of light energy into electrical energy. For instance, photovoltaic cells placed externally may convert sunlight or ambient room light into energy. In another example, changes in pressure may be converted into electrical energy. For instance, a piezoelectric appropriately placed on a device may be used to convert pressure changes (e.g. air pressure changes or direct pressure through contact) into electrical currents. In another example, thermal gradients may be converted into electrical energy. For instance, a thermo-electric generator (TEG) placed within a device may be used to convert a temperature gradient across the device into electrical energy. Such a TEG may be useful in devices that produce heat during their operation, as a portion of the heat energy could be converted into electrical energy.
The present teachings also include a method for designing a multi-layer multi-turn antenna for use in a high efficiency wireless power and data telemetry system. Given a certain frequency of operation, one or more of the following steps may be followed to design application-specific antennae:
The present teachings also include a method of manufacturing the antenna after the antenna is designed. The multi-layer multi-turn antenna utilizes strips of metal that may be deposited through a specific mask in, for example but not limited to, a PCB/ceramic/metal printing process or in a semiconductor foundry. An alternative method of fabricating the antenna may utilize conductive tape/ribbon/sheet/leaf with one or more tape/ribbon/sheet/leaf placed on top of each other separated by an insulating layer and shorting the multiple strips by soldering at the designated via locations. Another method of fabricating the antenna would be to cut out specific shapes from conductive sheets or “leaf” (e.g., gold or copper leaf) and following steps that similar to that for the conductive tape/ribbon. A three dimensional printing process may also be used in addition to metal deposition processes like physical vapor deposition, thin film deposition, thick film deposition and the like.
The present teachings lend themselves to be incorporated with current fabrication techniques for multi-layer printed wiring board, printed circuit boards and semiconductor fabrication technologies with multi-layer interconnects. As advancements in fabrication techniques are made, it is expected that the multi-layer multi-turn antenna will likely benefit greatly from such improvements. This compatibility with conventional fabrication techniques will allow these antennas to be relatively easily incorporated into conventional circuit boards. Such advances may also provide accurate repeatability and small feature sizes (i.e., high resolution).
As noted above, the design and structure of the present system allows for extended range (i.e., the separation distance between a transmitting and a receiving wireless antenna). The increase in range enables power to be transferred across a greater distance, allowing the transmitter to be further away from the receiver. For example, in applications such as RFID, the tag read range for high frequency interrogators is no greater than 3 feet, which is insufficient for certain applications, such as pallet tracking. The wireless antenna of the present system offers an improvement for pallet tracking via RFID by delivering the concentrated power that this particular application requires to facilitate reflecting the interrogator signal needed for better extended read range performance. In other applications such as military systems, the extended range provided by the present invention enables transfer of power to devices in difficult to reach locations, or to devices in harsh environments. In consumer electronics the extended range allows for the user to charge or transfer energy to a device from a more convenient location.
The present system also enables multiple operational needs from a single design concept, namely, the multi-layer multi-turn antenna. The present system may serve as a receiver antenna, a source antenna, a transceiver (acting as a source and a receiver), and as a repeater antenna. Alternatively, the design may be used for inductor designs solely as a lumped element in a circuit (e.g., in RF filters circuits, RF matching circuits).
The MLMT antenna structure of the present invention may be represented in various circuit design embodiments. An equivalent circuit diagram for the MLMT antenna structure is given in
The characteristics of the MLMT antenna embodiment depend on the design values of LM, RM, and CM; the operating center frequency and additional components that are placed across Terminal 1 and Terminal 2.
Let the angular frequency of operation be ω. The input impedance, Zinput of the MLMT antenna embodiment then is given in general terms by equation 1(c) based on 1(a) and 1(b)
The MLMT antenna structure of the present invention then can be represented in various circuit design embodiments. For example, the MLMT antenna structure can be operated in three modes:
The unique arrangement of the layers and customized wire segmentation in the present system compared with existing design technologies demonstrates improved system performance in similar and smaller packaging volumes as shown by quality factors that are more than 2 times higher than those realized from existing technologies. By combining material with specific properties, specifying shapes, lengths, and thicknesses and defining layer order, the present system permits pairing of the inductance and quality factor with a specific application to optimally achieve a desired response, including, but not limited to, wireless tissue stimulation, wireless telemetry, wireless component recharging, wireless non-destructive testing, wireless sensing, and wireless energy or power management.
Another specific advantage of the present system is that it enables a more efficient means of Near Field Magnetic Coupling (NFMC) for power and/or data transfer in an equivalent or smaller design volume by reducing conductor loss associated with increasing frequencies (due to the phenomenon referred to as Skin Effect). The proposed system also provides a solution that can be relatively easily achieved by existing manufacturing techniques (for example multi-layer printed wiring board), and can therefore be integrated with other circuit components such as ICs, resistors, capacitors, surface mount components, etc. Other advantages of the present system includes reducing power consumption thereby leading to longer battery lives (where applicable), a reduction in the Joule heating of the antenna, decreasing the consumption of environmental resources of the appliance/device, and any other benefit derived from a more energy efficient device.
Other applications that may benefit from these wireless systems include but are not limited to geo-sensing, oil exploration, fault detection, portable electronic, military, defense and medical devices, among other medical implantable, medical non-implantable, commercial, military, aerospace, industrial and other electronic equipment or device applications. It is understood that the scope of the invention covers not only any application that will benefit from increases in efficiency, but also any application that may require the use of an inductive element.
While the foregoing has described what are considered to be the best mode and/or other examples, it is understood that various modifications may be made therein and that the subject matter disclosed herein may be implemented in various forms and examples, and that the teachings may be applied in numerous applications, only some of which have been described herein. It is intended by the following claims to claim any and all applications, modifications and variations that fall within the true scope of the present teachings.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 15/227,192, filed on Aug. 3, 2016, and entitled “A MULTI-LAYER-MULTI-TURN STRUCTURE FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION,” which in turn is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 14/059,100, filed on Oct. 21, 2013, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,444,213, and entitled “METHOD FOR MANUFACTURE OF MULTI-LAYER WIRE STRUCTURE FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION,” which in turn is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/233,686, filed on Sep. 15, 2011, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,567,048, and entitled “METHOD OF MANUFACTURE OF MULTI-LAYER WIRE STRUCTURE,” which in turn is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/255,659, filed on Sep. 9, 2011 and having a § 371(c) date of Nov. 22, 2011, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,855,786, and entitled “System and Method for Wireless Power Transfer in Implantable Medical Devices,” which in turn is a national stage entry of International Application No. PCT/US2010/000714, filed on Mar. 9, 2010, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/158,688, filed on Mar. 9, 2009, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2797393 | Clogston | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2911605 | Wales, Jr. et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
| 3141144 | Watts, Jr. | Jul 1964 | A |
| 3231894 | Kiyoshi | Jan 1966 | A |
| 3413716 | Schwertz | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3436687 | Andrews, Jr. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3484731 | Rich et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
| 4328531 | Nagashima et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4494100 | Stengel et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4578654 | Tait | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4918418 | Tsala | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4959631 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4996165 | Chang et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5137478 | Graf et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5218343 | Stobbe et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5237165 | Tingley, III | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5349744 | Takahashi | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5367242 | Hulman | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5604352 | Schuetz | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5713939 | Nedungadi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5748464 | Schuetz | May 1998 | A |
| 5767808 | Robbins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767813 | Verma et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770991 | Baird | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777538 | Schuetz | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5801611 | Van Loenen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808587 | Shima | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5831348 | Nishizawa | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838154 | Morikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5858154 | Toki | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5883392 | Schuetz | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892489 | Kanba et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5980773 | Takeda | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005193 | Markel | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021337 | Remillard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028568 | Asakura et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6107972 | Seward et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6148221 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148500 | Krone | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163307 | Kim et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6208115 | Binder | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6268796 | Gnadinger | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271803 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6344828 | Grantz | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6388628 | Dettloff et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6503831 | Speakman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6556101 | Tada et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6583769 | Shiroki et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6664863 | Okamoto et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6745008 | Carrender et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6809688 | Yamada | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6897830 | Bae et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6924230 | Sun et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6956188 | De Rooij et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6996892 | Dening | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7046113 | Okamoto et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7205655 | Sippola | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7355558 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7563352 | Hubel | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7579835 | Schnell et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7579836 | Schnell et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7713762 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7786836 | Gabara | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7903043 | Rawat et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7919886 | Tanaka | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7952365 | Narita et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7967216 | Kato et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8056819 | Rowell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8299877 | Hong et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8354962 | Aoki | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8427012 | Azancot | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8436780 | Schaniz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8541974 | Farahani | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8567048 | Singh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8610530 | Singh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8653927 | Singh et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8680960 | Singh et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8692641 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8692642 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698590 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8698591 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8707546 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8710948 | Singh et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8774712 | Sato et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8803630 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8803649 | Singh et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8823481 | Singh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8823482 | Singh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855786 | Derbas et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8860545 | Singh et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8898885 | Singh et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9178369 | Partovi | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9208942 | Singh et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9515494 | Kurs et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9559526 | Von Novak, III et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9912173 | Tseng | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 10868444 | Peralta et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10892646 | Peralta et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 20020020554 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053992 | Kawakami et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020070862 | Francis et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071003 | Kimura | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075191 | Yokoshima et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020079134 | Kaneda | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101383 | Junod | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105080 | Speakman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030006069 | Takebe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119677 | Qiyan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214399 | Naruse et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040000974 | Odenaal | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085247 | Mickle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040108311 | De Rooij et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118920 | He | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040132406 | Scott et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140528 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159460 | Passiopoulos et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189528 | Killen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196132 | Yu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217488 | Luechinger | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227608 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263308 | Yu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050121229 | Takai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134520 | Rawat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174628 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212640 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288741 | Hassler | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060022772 | Kanno et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040628 | Porret et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061325 | Tang | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066441 | Knadle, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187044 | Fabian et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187059 | Fabian et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060192645 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209487 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244568 | Tong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060255945 | Egbert | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284718 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070018767 | Gabara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070020969 | Yungers | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023424 | Weber | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035363 | Kameya | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045773 | Mi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046544 | Murofushi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070090912 | Lee | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095913 | Takahashi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120629 | Schnell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070145830 | Lee | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179570 | De Taboada et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182367 | Partovi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070267718 | Lee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279287 | Castaneda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004904 | Tran | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080030292 | Kubono | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039332 | Bernstein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080055178 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062066 | Arai | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080067874 | Tseng | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150693 | You et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164840 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164844 | Kato et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164960 | Schnell et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172109 | Rahman | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080211320 | Cook et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227478 | Greene et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080238600 | Olson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080277386 | Haimer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283277 | Muramatsu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303735 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001818 | Iisaka | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090001930 | Pohjonen | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090001932 | Kamijo | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090009006 | Jin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090010028 | Baarman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090015197 | Sogabe | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090015266 | Narita et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090021219 | Yoda | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090045773 | Pandya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058190 | Tanaka | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079268 | Cook et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079628 | Rofougaran | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085706 | Baarman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096413 | Partovi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090108974 | Raggam et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134875 | Tomiha et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140691 | Jung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090152542 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189816 | Nikitin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090230777 | Baarman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261778 | Kook | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261936 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100033289 | Liu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100033290 | Liu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100072588 | Yang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079232 | Okawa et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100127660 | Cook et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141042 | Kesler et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100148589 | Hamam et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164296 | Kurs et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182118 | Roskos | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100219694 | Kurs et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100237709 | Hall et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277376 | Chakam et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100283698 | Orihara | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289599 | Knecht et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289709 | Guan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295701 | Denis et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110018499 | Fujiwara | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110024510 | Kato et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110025133 | Sauerlaender et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110063184 | Furumura et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110084656 | Gao | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110101788 | Sun et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137379 | Wosmek et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241437 | Kanno | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248891 | Han et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279198 | Haner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120062345 | Kurs et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120086556 | Ikemoto | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120091794 | Campanella et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120095531 | Derbas et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120119575 | Kurs et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120169434 | Masuda et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193993 | Azancot | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120212073 | Azancot | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120217819 | Yamakawa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120223573 | Schatz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235500 | Ganem | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235634 | Hall et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235636 | Partovi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120249396 | Parsche | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120274148 | Sung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280765 | Kurs et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120326931 | Murayama et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130067737 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067738 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068499 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068507 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069748 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069749 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069750 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130069843 | Singh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130076154 | Baarman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130146671 | Grieshofer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199027 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199028 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200070 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200722 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200968 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200969 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200976 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201589 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130205582 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130207744 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208389 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130208390 | Singh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130257362 | Lim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130264885 | Lee | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130300207 | Wang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140008974 | Miyamoto | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140028111 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035383 | Riehl | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140035793 | Kato et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140041218 | Signh et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042824 | Fells | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047713 | Singh et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140084946 | Clark et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140145906 | Kato et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140168019 | Hirobe et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140183971 | Endo et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140197694 | Asanuma et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140231518 | Yosui | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266019 | Pigott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361628 | Huang et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150054455 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150091502 | Mukherjee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150115727 | Carobolante et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150136858 | Finn et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150137746 | Lee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150140807 | Mohammed et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145634 | Kurz et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145635 | Kurz et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150170833 | Widmer | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150180440 | Ishizuka | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207541 | Kuroda | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150236545 | Hyun et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150280322 | Saito et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150318624 | Schantz et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150318710 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150357827 | Muratov et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160056664 | Partovi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160118711 | Finn et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160126002 | Chien et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160149416 | Ha et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156103 | Bae et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160156215 | Bae et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160224975 | Na et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20170126544 | Vigneras et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20180167107 | Peralta et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167108 | Peralta et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180167109 | Peralta et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180168057 | Peralta et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180212649 | Tenno | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2650300 | Oct 2004 | CN |
| 101394022 | Mar 2009 | CN |
| 101523693 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101836330 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 102231313 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 102341957 | Feb 2012 | CN |
| 102522388 | Jun 2012 | CN |
| 102544615 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102832193 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 103944196 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 104037493 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104037494 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 0310396 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 1609503 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 2031729 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2775564 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| 2775565 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| H01310518 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| H0583249 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| H0993005 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| H10255629 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 2001344574 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2007042569 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2008160781 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008205215 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2008294285 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2008307114 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2012147408 | Aug 2012 | JP |
| 2013093429 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2014175864 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 2014175865 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 20100092741 | Aug 2010 | KR |
| 20100097233 | Sep 2010 | KR |
| 101216946 | Jan 2013 | KR |
| 20130015618 | Feb 2013 | KR |
| 20140111554 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 20140111794 | Sep 2014 | KR |
| 20140135357 | Nov 2014 | KR |
| 101559939 | Oct 2015 | KR |
| 201436494 | Sep 2014 | TW |
| 201436495 | Sep 2014 | TW |
| 2008050917 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2010104569 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Exhibit B-06: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-Dlc (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 3atent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), Apr. 12, 2019, 71 pages. |
| Exhibit B-07: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), Apr. 12, 2019, 45 pages. |
| Exhibit B-08: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), Apr. 12, 2019, 75 pages. |
| Exhibit B-09: Invalidity Contentions: '046 PATENT in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), Apr. 12, 2019, 33 pages. |
| Exhibit B-10: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), Apr. 12, 2019, 42 pages. |
| Exhibit B-11: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), Apr. 12, 2019, 69 pages. |
| Exhibit B-12: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Granted Publication 4959631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit B-13: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), Apr. 12, 2019, 33 pages. |
| Exhibit B-14: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kato '840, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 32 pages. |
| Exhibit B-15: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kato '844, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit B-16: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Inventor Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), Apr. 12, 2019, 53 pages. |
| Exhibit B-17: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs'765”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit B-18: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 33 pages. |
| Exhibit B-19: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by US 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), Apr. 12, 2019, 51 pages. |
| Exhibit B-20: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit B-21: Invalidity Contentions '046 Patent in View of Inventor Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), Apr. 12, 2019, 39 pages. |
| Exhibit B-22: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), Apr. 12, 2019, 55 pages. |
| Exhibit B-23: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of 01 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), Apr. 12, 2019, 23 pages. |
| Exhibit B-24: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), Apr. 12, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Exhibit B-25: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by 5,808,587 A (“HiroshiShima”), Apr. 12, 2019, 76 pages. |
| Exhibit B-26: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), Apr. 12, 2019, 55 pages. |
| Exhibit B-27: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 3,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), Apr. 12, 2019, 62 pages. |
| Exhibit B-28: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit B-29: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), Apr. 12, 2019, 36 pages. |
| Exhibit B-30: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Yoon & Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), Apr. 12, 2019, 39 pages. |
| Exhibit B-31: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, Apr. 12, 2019, 135 pages. |
| Exhibit B-32: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG G2, Apr. 12, 2019, 401 pages. |
| Exhibit B-33: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“the '046 Patent”) by the LG G3, Apr. 12, 2019, 200 pages. |
| Exhibit B-34: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, Apr. 12, 2019, 340 pages. |
| Exhibit C-01: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), Apr. 12, 2019, 59 pages. |
| Exhibit C-02: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs'694”), Apr. 12, 2019, 61 pages. |
| Exhibit C-03: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), Apr. 12, 2019, 84 pages. |
| Exhibit C-04: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), Apr. 12, 2019, 58 pages. |
| Exhibit C-05: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), Apr. 12, 2019, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit C-06: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Burghartz & Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by on the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), Apr. 12, 2019, 61 pages. |
| Exhibit C-07:Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), Apr. 12, 2019, 98 pages. |
| Exhibit C-08: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), Apr. 12, 2019, 49 pages. |
| Exhibit C-09: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit C-10: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), Apr. 12, 2019, 85 pages. |
| Exhibit C-11: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Hasegawa '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Granted Publication 4959631 A (“Hasegawa'631”), Apr. 12, 2019, 40 pages. |
| Exhibit C-12: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), Apr. 12, 2019, 40 pages. |
| Exhibit C-13: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kato '840, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 35 pages. |
| Exhibit C 14: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kato '844, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 39 pages. |
| Exhibit C-15: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), Apr. 12, 2019, 52 pages. |
| Exhibit C-16: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), Apr. 12, 2019, 61 pages. |
| Exhibit C-17: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Misum, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misum Shuichi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit C-18: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), Apr. 12, 2019, 59 pages. |
| Exhibit C-19: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), Apr. 12, 2019, 55 pages. |
| Exhibit C-20: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Afshin Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), Apr. 12, 2019, 56 pages. |
| Exhibit C-21: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), Apr. 12, 2019, 77 pages. |
| CN Application No. 201910508728.8, Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2021, 16 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Ex. 1001, U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 to Singh et al., Mar. 22, 2019, 50 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Preliminary Guidance, Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Paper 48, Aug. 27, 2020, 18 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Mar. 22, 2019, 87 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 B2, Sep. 25, 2019, 48 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., Ex. 1017—U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,344 to Balakrishnan, Mar. 22, 2019, 12 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., Ex. 1025—US20070126544A1 to Wotherspoon, Mar. 22, 2019, 6 pages. |
| IPR2019-00859—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., Samsung Ex. 1042—Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Jul. 2, 2019, 15 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Preliminary Guidance, Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Paper 39, Aug. 27, 2020, 20 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1022 U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 to Tseng, Mar. 6, 2018, 31 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1023 U.S. Pat. No. 7,248,138 to Chiang, Jul. 24, 2007, 18 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1024 U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,958 to Yerman et al., Feb. 4, 1992, 20 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1028—U.S. Pat. No. 9,820,374 to Bois et al., Nov. 14, 2017, 9 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 7,601,919 to Phan et al., Oct. 13, 2009, 14 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1030 U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,825 to Wojnarowski et al., Apr. 28, 1992, 10 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Ex. 1034 U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,363 to Fazelpour, Aug. 19, 2003, 8 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 B2, Sep. 25, 2019, 6 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Mar. 22, 2019, 86 pages. |
| IPR2019-00860—Samsung Exhibit 1042, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, NuCurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., Case 1:19-cv-00798-DLC, Jul. 2, 2019, 15 pages. |
| IPR2019-00861, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Preliminary Guidance, Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Paper 39, Aug. 27, 2020, 19 pages. |
| IPR2019-00861—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Mar. 22, 2019, 89 pages. |
| IPR2019-00862, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948, Preliminary Guidance, Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Paper 50, Aug. 27, 2020, 21 pages. |
| IPR2019-00862, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., Samsung Exhibit 1042-Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary injunction, NuCurrent, Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC, Jul. 2, 2019, 15 pages. |
| IPR2019-00862—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948, Mar. 22, 2019, 88 pages. |
| IPR2019-00863, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 B2, Oct. 7, 2019, 42 pages. |
| IPR2019-00863, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, Preliminary Guidance, Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Paper 49, Aug. 27, 2020, 21 pages. |
| IPR2019-00863—Ex. 1002—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Corrected Dr. Steven Leeb Declaration, Mar. 22, 2019, 124 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, Jun. 19, 2019, 90 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729, Peralta, Apr. 10, 2018, 48 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1002—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., Re., in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S Pat. No 9,941,729, Jun. 17, 2019, 143 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1003—CV of R. Jacob Baker, Jun. 19, 2019, 35 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004 U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, filed Aug. 7, 2015, part 1, 330 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004 U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, filed Aug. 7, 2015, part 3, 230 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004 U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, filed Aug. 7, 2015, part 4, 299 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex. 1004 U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, part 2, filing date Aug. 7, 2015, 430 pages. |
| IPR2019-01217—Ex.1015—Wotherspoon—US 2007/0126544, Jun. 7, 2007, 6 pages. |
| IPR2019-0863, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, Mar. 22, 2019, 89 pages. |
| “Korean Patent Office, Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2020, issued in connection with Korean Application No. KR 10-2019-0083649, 10 pages”. |
| Lee, Y., “Antenna Circuit Design for RFID Applications”, 2003 Microchip Technology, AN710, 50 pages. |
| Muratov, V., “Multi-Mode Wireless Power Systems can be a bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless charging”, Mediatek, Inc., Nov. 20, 2014, 15 pages. |
| Narayanan, R., “Wireless Power Charging Coil Changing Considerations”, Wurth Elektronik, Feb. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Notification of Decision of Rejection dated May 14, 2019 for KR 10-2013-0026135, 8 pages. |
| Notification of Decision of Rejection dated May 14, 2019 for KR App. No. 10-2013-0025858, with English Translation, 8 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2018 in corresponding TW Application No. 102108345, 11 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2017 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2017 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2017 issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048, 11 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2017, issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102108342, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047049, 5 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017 issued in corresponding EP Patent Application No. 14000885.5, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017 issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2018 issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310075086.X, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2018 issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201310074946.8, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 8, 2018, issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048, 2 pages. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017 in corresponding JP Application No. 2013-047049, 5 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2018 in corresponding KR Application No. 10-2013-0025858, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2018 in corresponding KR Application No. 10-2013-0026135, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310074946.8, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2018 in corresponding CN Application No. 201310075086.X, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 13 001 121.6, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 in corresponding EP Application No. 13 001 130.7 6, pages. |
| PGR2019-00049, Petitioner's Current List of Exhibits, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Jun. 18, 2020, 4 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, U. S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, filed Jun. 18, 2020, 37 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, Judgment, Final Written Decision Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable, Paper 28, Nov. 30, 2020, 42 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049, Samsung Exhibit 1015, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Rebuttal Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v Promos Technologies, Inc., Jun. 18, 2020, 25 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049, Samsung Exhibit 1016, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Oral Deposition of Dr. David S. Ricketts, May 20, 2020, 104 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049—Ex. 1002—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., v. NuCurrent, Inc., Declaration of Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E. In Support of Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, May 27, 2019, 141 pages. |
| PGR2019-00049—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Post-Grant Review re U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, May 28, 2019, 112 pages. |
| PGR2019-00050, Petitioner's Current List of Exhibits, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Jun. 18, 2020, 3 pages. |
| PGR2019-00050, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, Jun. 18, 2020, 32 pages. |
| PGR2019-00050, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, Judgment, Final Written Decision Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable, Paper 26, Nov. 30, 2020, 22 pages. |
| PGR2019-00050, Samsung Exhibit 1010, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Rebuttal Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph D., P.E., Jun. 18, 2020, 14 pages. |
| PGR2019-00050, Samsung Exhibit 1011, SamsungElectronics Co. Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Deposition of Dr. David S. Ricketts,Mar. 12, 2020, 124 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, filed Aug. 7, 2015, Part 2, 430 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, filed Aug. 7, 2015, Part 3, 230 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, filed Aug. 7, 2015, Part 4, 299 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1006 File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,065, Part 1, filed Aug. 7, 2015, 330 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1002—Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D., P.E. In Support of Petition for Post-Grant Review of U S. Pat No. 10,063,100, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., May 27, 2019, 42 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—EX. 1005 U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 to Peralta et al., Apr. 10, 2018, 48 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1008—First Amended Complaint for NuCurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case. No. 6:18-cv-00051-JRG-KNM, Jun. 19, 2018, 62 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Ex. 1009—NuCurrent's Opening Claim Construction Brief, NuCurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case. No. 1:19-CV-00798-DLC, May 10, 2019, 31 pages. |
| PGR2019-0050—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, May 28, 2019, 73 pages. |
| QI 2009, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Version 0.95, Jul. 2009, 76 pages. |
| QI 2010, “System Description Wireless Power Transfer”, vol. 1, Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1, Oct. 2010, Wireless Power Consortium, 86 pages. |
| Relative Permativity—Dielectric Constant—Jul. 2011, 3 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc. Case IPR2019-00858, Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Sep. 25, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Case IPR2019-00861, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 B2, Sep. 25, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Case IPR2019-00862, Decision Granting of Inter Partes Review re U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 B2, Oct. 4, 2019, 41 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00858, IPR2019-00860 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960); IPR2019-00859, IPR2019-00861 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046); IPR2019-00862 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948); IPR2019-00863 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591), Record of Oral Hearing Held Dec. 7, 2020, Paper 74, Entered Jan. 12, 2021, 108 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00858, U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Judgment—Final Written Decision, Paper 88, dated Feb. 23, 2021, 93 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00859, U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Judgment—Final Written Decision, Paper 88, dated Feb. 23, 2021, 93 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00860, U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Judgment—Final Written Decision, Paper 79, Feb. 23, 2021, 95 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00861, U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Judgment—Final Written Decision, Paper 81, dated Feb. 23, 2021, 96 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00862, U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948, Judgment—Final Written Decision, Paper 90, dated Feb. 23, 2021, 94 pages. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., IPR2019-00863, U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, Judgment—Final Written Decision, Paper 89, dated Feb. 23, 2021, 93 pages. |
| Samsung Ex. 1002, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., v. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Declaration of Dr. Steven Leeb, Mar. 22, 2019, 115 pages. |
| Sun M., et al., “Apparatus for Wireless Power and Data Transfer over a Distance”, University of Pittsburgh, Jun. 2009, 30 pages. |
| Yoon, Y., “Embedded Conductor Technology for Micromachined RF Elements”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Jun. 2005, 11 pages. |
| Ex. 1020 Alldred, et al., “A 1.2 V, 60 Ghz Radio Receiver With Onchip Transformers and Inductors in 90 nm CMOS,” Proc. IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuits SYmp., pp. 51-54, Nov. 2006 (“Alldred”), 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1031 Ahn U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,725, Apr. 18, 2006, 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1032—U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,331 to Shamouilian et al., Apr. 28, 1998, 23 pages. |
| Ex. 1033—Hu, et al., “AC Resistance to Planar Power Inductors and the Quasidistributed Gap Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 4, Jul. 2001 (“Hu”), 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1035—A 1.2V 60-GHz Radio Receiver With On-Chip Transformers and Inductors in 90-nm CMOS, 2006 IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Nov. 12-15, 2006, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1036 Kraemer, et al., “Architecture Considerations for 60 GhzPulse Transceiver Front-Ends,” CAS 2007 Proceedings vol. 2, 2007, Int'l Semiconductor Conference (2007), 26 pages. |
| Ex. 1037—Varonen, et al., “V-band Balanced Resistive Mixer in 65-nm CMOS,” Proceedings of the 33rd European Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2007, 22 pages. |
| Ex. 1038—AC Resistance of Planar Power Inductors and the Quasidistributed Gap Technique, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, Issue 4, Jul. 2001, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1039—Lopera et al., “A Multiwinding Modeling Method for High Frequency Transformers and Inductors”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 18, No. 3, May 2003, 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1040—Leonavicius et al., “Comparison of Realization Techniques for PFC Inductor Operating in Discontinuous Conduction Mode,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 2, Mar. 2004, 14 pages. |
| Ex. 1041—Roshen W.A., “Fringing Field Formulas and Winding Loss Due to an Air Gap,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 8, Aug. 2007, 12 pages. |
| Exhibit A-01: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), Apr. 12, 2019, 56 pages. |
| Exhibit A-02: Invalidity Contentions: '960Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs '694”), Apr. 12, 2019, 59 pages. |
| Exhibit A-03: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”). Apr. 12, 2019, 86 pages. |
| Exhibit A-04: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), Apr. 12, 2019, 51 pages. |
| Exhibit A-05: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit A-06: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Granted Publication 6897830 B2 (“Bae”), Apr. 12, 2019, 80 pages. |
| Exhibit A-07: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), Apr. 12, 2019, 82 pages. |
| Exhibit A-08: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 20111084656 A1 (“Gao”), Apr. 12, 2019, 39 pages. |
| Exhibit A-09: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Burghartz &Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by on the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), Apr. 12, 2019, 53 pages. |
| Exhibit A-10: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru”), Apr. 12, 2019, 46 pages. |
| Exhibit A-11: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), Apr. 12, 2019, 82 pages. |
| Exhibit A-12: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Granted Publication 4959631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), Apr. 12, 2019, 43 pages. |
| Exhibit A-13: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by JP Patent Application Publication 2008/294285 A (“Ishihara Keien”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit A-14: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 35 pages. |
| Exhibit A-15: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n. Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 40 pages. |
| Exhibit A-16: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.n.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), Apr. 12, 2019, 59 pages. |
| Exhibit A-17: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), Apr. 12, 2019, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit A-18: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit A-19: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), Apr. 12, 2019, 58 pages. |
| Exhibit A-20: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), Apr. 12, 2019, 49 pages. |
| Exhibit A-21: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Inventor Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S.Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), Apr. 12, 2019, 45 pages. |
| Exhibit A-22: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”), Apr. 12, 2019, 64 pages. |
| Exhibit A-23: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of QI 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), Apr. 12, 2019, 26 pages. |
| Exhibit A-24: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of QI 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), Apr. 12, 2019, 49 pages. |
| Exhibit A-25: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), Apr. 12, 2019, 87 pages. |
| Exhibit A-26: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), Apr. 12, 2019, 65 pages. |
| Exhibit A-27: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 3,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), Apr. 12, 2019, 67 pages. |
| Exhibit A-28: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), Apr. 12, 2019, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit A-29: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), Apr. 12, 2019, 40 pages. |
| Exhibit A-30: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Yoon & Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), Apr. 12, 2019, 13 pages. |
| Exhibit A-31: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, Apr. 12, 2019, 154 pages. |
| Exhibit A-32: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the LG G2, Apr. 12, 2019, 462 pages. |
| Exhibit A-33: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the LG G3, Apr. 12, 2019, 228 pages. |
| Exhibit A-34: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, Apr. 12, 2019, 391 pages. |
| Exhibit B-01: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit B-02: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kurs '694, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs '694”), Apr. 12, 2019, 51 pages. |
| Exhibit B-03: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), Apr. 12, 2019, 76 pages. |
| Exhibit B-04: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), Apr. 12, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Exhibit B-05: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Baarman '777, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“Baarman '777”), Apr. 12, 2019,42 pages. |
| Exhibit C-22: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of 01 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), Apr. 12, 2019, 29 pages. |
| Exhibit C-23: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of 01 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), Apr. 12, 2019, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit C-24: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 5,808,587 A (“Hiroshi Shima”), Apr. 12, 2019, 102 pages. |
| Exhibit C-25: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), Apr. 12, 2019, 68 pages. |
| Exhibit C-26: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), Apr. 12, 2019, 84 pages. |
| Exhibit C-27: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), Apr. 12, 2019, 81 pages. |
| Exhibit C-28: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), Apr. 12, 2019, 46 pages. |
| Exhibit C-29: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Yoon & Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), Apr. 12, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Exhibit C-30: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), Apr. 12, 2019, 88 pages. |
| Exhibit C-31: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, Apr. 12, 2019, 180 pages. |
| Exhibit C-32: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“the '591 Patent”) by the LG G2, Apr. 12, 2019, 557 pages. |
| Exhibit C-33: Invalidity Contentions: 'Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG G3 NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The 591 Patent”) by the LG G3, Apr. 12, 2019, 266 pages. |
| Exhibit C-34: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, Apr. 12, 2019, 468 pages. |
| Exhibit D-01: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Jitsuo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication JP05082349A (“Jitsuo”), Apr. 12, 2019, 54 pages. |
| Exhibit D-02: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kurs, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0219694 A1 (“Kurs”), Apr. 12, 2019, 59 pages. |
| Exhibit D-03: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Sheng-Yuan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/267718 A1 (“Sheng-Yuan”), Apr. 12, 2019, 77 pages. |
| Exhibit D-04: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Wotherspoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0126544 A1 (“Wotherspoon”), Apr. 12, 2019, 52 pages. |
| Exhibit D-05: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Baarman, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0230777A1 (“David W. Baarman”), Apr. 12, 2019, 52 pages. |
| Exhibit D-06: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,830 B2 (“Bae”), Apr. 12, 2019, 82 pages. |
| Exhibit D-07: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Burghartz & Rejaei, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by on the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon (“Burghartz & Rejaei”), Apr. 12, 2019, 52 pages. |
| Exhibit D-08: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Ganem, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235500 A1 (“Steven J. Ganem”), Apr. 12, 2019, 92 pages. |
| Exhibit D-09: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Gao, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/084656 A1 (“Gao”), Apr. 12, 2019, 44 pages. |
| Exhibit D-10: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa '215, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2008-205215 A (“Hasegawa Minoru '215”), Apr. 12, 2019, 16 pages. |
| Exhibit D-11: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa Michio '631, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Granted Publication 4959631 A (“Hasegawa Michio '631”), Apr. 12, 2019, 37 pages. |
| Exhibit D-12: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Hasegawa '518, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by J.P. Patent Application Publication 01310518 A (“Hasegawa Michio '518”), Apr. 12, 2019, 78 pages. |
| Exhibit D-13: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Ishihara, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by 2008/294285 A (“IshiharaKeien”), Apr. 12, 2019, 38 pages. |
| Exhibit D-14: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164840 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 34 pages. |
| Exhibit D-15: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kato, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/164844 A1 (“Hiroshi Kato”), Apr. 12, 2019, 39 pages. |
| Exhibit D-16: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kimura, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/071003 A1 (“Isao Kimura”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit D-17: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kurs '765, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0280765 A1 (“Kurs '765”), Apr. 12, 2019, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit D-18: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Misumi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Japanese. Patent Application Publication JP 10255629 A (“Misumi Shuichi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 34 pages. |
| Exhibit D-19: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Nakatani, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/227608 A1 (“Toshifumi Nakatani”), Apr. 12, 2019, 56 pages. |
| Exhibit D-20: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '367, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0182367 A1 (“Partovi '367”), Apr. 12, 2019, 51 pages. |
| Exhibit D-21: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '413, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0096413 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '413”), Apr. 12, 2019, 51 pages. |
| Exhibit D-22: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Partovi '636, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0235636 A1 (“Afshin Partovi '636”),Apr. 12, 2019, 67 pages. |
| Exhibit D-23: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of 01 0.95, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Version 0.95 (“Qi 0.95”), Apr. 12, 2019, 28 pages. |
| Exhibit D-24: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of QI 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), Apr. 12, 2019, 55 pages. |
| Exhibit D-25: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Shima, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,587 (“Hiroshi Shima”), Apr. 12, 2019, 94 pages. |
| Exhibit D-26: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Sun, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by 2011/0101788 A1 (“Sun”), Apr. 12, 2019, 63 pages. |
| Exhibit D-27: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Tseng, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 3,912,173 B2 (“Ryan Tseng”), Apr. 12, 2019, 75 pages. |
| Exhibit D-28: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Von Novak, III, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,526 B2 (“William H. Von Novak, III”), Apr. 12, 2019, 73 pages. |
| Exhibit D-29: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Yamakawa, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0217819 A1 (“Yamakawa”), Apr. 12, 2019, 42 pages. |
| Exhibit D-30: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Yoon & Allen, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Embedded Conductor Technology for Micromachined Rf Elements (“Yoon & Allen”), Apr. 12, 2019, 41 pages. |
| Exhibit D-31—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the Blackberry Z30, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by the Blackberry Z30, Apr. 12, 2019, 168 pages. |
| Exhibit D-32: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the LG G2, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by the LG G2, Apr. 12, 2019, 511 pages. |
| Exhibit D-33-Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of LG G3, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by the LG G3, Apr. 12, 2019, 249 pages. |
| Exhibit D-34—Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of the LG Nexus 5, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“the '948 Patent”) by the LG Nexus 5, Apr. 12, 2019, 434 pages. |
| Exhibit E-01: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Ha, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2016/0149416 (“Ha”), Apr. 12, 2019, 99 pages. |
| Exhibit E-02: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Riehl, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication 2014/0035383 (“Riehl”), Apr. 12, 2019, 50 pages. |
| Exhibit E-03 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Baarman '154, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The 729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0076154 (“Baarman '154”), Apr. 12, 2019, 42 pages. |
| Nucurrent, Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics Co., Response Brief of Appellee, Case No. 21-1840, Document 21, Nov. 12, 2021, 72 pages. |
| CN 201910508728.8, Rejection Decision, Oct. 29, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Exhibit E-04: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kanno, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication 2011/0241437 (“Kanno”), Apr. 12, 2019, 30 pages. |
| Exhibit E-05: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kazuya, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Application Publication 2013093429 (“Kazuya”), Apr. 12, 2019, 32 pages. |
| Exhibit E-06: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Muratov, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 3,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0357827 (“Muratov”), Apr. 12, 2019, 35 pages. |
| Exhibit E-07: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Sung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2012/0274148 (“Sung”), Apr. 12, 2019, 27 pages. |
| Exhibit E-08 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kurz '635, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0145635 (“Kurz '635”), Apr. 12, 2019, 133 pages. |
| Exhibit E-09: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Kurz '634, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0145635 (“Kurz '634”), Apr. 12, 2019, 122 pages. |
| Exhibit E-10: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Lee '746, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0137746 (“Lee '746”), Apr. 12, 2019, 34 pages. |
| Exhibit E-11: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Mukherjee, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0091502 (“Mukherjee”), Apr. 12, 2019, 32 pages. |
| Exhibit E-12: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Asanuma, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0197694 (“Asanuma”), Apr. 12, 2019, 24 pages. |
| Exhibit E-13: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Takashi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2014/0008974 (“Takashi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 77 pages. |
| Exhibit E-14: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Hoon, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics 4merica, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Korean Patent Publication No. 20130015618 (“Hoon”), Apr. 12, 2019, 28 pages. |
| Exhibit E-15 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Lee '710, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0318710 (“Lee '710”), Apr. 12, 2019, 42 pages. |
| Exhibit E-16: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Hisanori, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Publication No. 2012-147408 (“Hisanori”), Apr. 12, 2019, 45 pages. |
| Exhibit E-17: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Muratov Presentation, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Multi-Mode Wireless Power Systems can be a Bridge to the Promised Land of Universal Contactless Charging, presented by Vladimir Muratov (“Muratov Presentation”), Apr. 12, 2019, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit E-18: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Han, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2017/0353055 A1 (“Han”), Apr. 12, 2019, 46 pages. |
| Exhibit E-19: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Riehl IEEE, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Wireless Power Systems for Mobile Devices Supporting Inductive and Resonant Operating Modes, by Patrick S. Riehl et al., IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, No. 3, Mar. 3, 2015 (Riehl IEEE), Apr. 12, 2019, 56 pages. |
| Exhibit F-01: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) ay Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), Apr. 12, 2019, 34 pages. |
| Exhibit F-02: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), Apr. 12, 2019, 58 pages. |
| Exhibit F-03: Invalidity Contentions: '960 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960 (“The '960 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), Apr. 12, 2019, 30 pages. |
| Exhibit G-01: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), Apr. 12, 2019, 33 pages. |
| Exhibit G-02: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), Apr. 12, 2019, 49 pages. |
| Exhibit G-03: Invalidity Contentions: '046 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 (“The '046 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), Apr. 12, 2019, 26 pages. |
| Exhibit H-01: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), Apr. 12, 2019, 43 pages. |
| Exhibit H-02: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), Apr. 12, 2019, 88 pages. |
| Exhibit H-03: Invalidity Contentions: '591 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591 (“The '591 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), Apr. 12, 2019, 49 pages. |
| Exhibit I-01: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Chung Yeon Ho, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by Korean Patent Application Publication 2010/0092741 A (“Chung Yeon Ho”), Apr. 12, 2019, 39 pages. |
| Exhibit I-02: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Jung, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/0140691 A1 (“Chun-Kil Jung”), Apr. 12, 2019, 78 pages. |
| Exhibit I-03: Invalidity Contentions: '948 Patent in View of Kook, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 (“The '948 Patent”) by WIPO Patent Application Publication 2008/050917 A1 (“Kook Yoon-Sang”), Apr. 12, 2019, 43 pages. |
| Exhibit J-01 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Satoshi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Japanese Patent Publication No. 2001-344574 (“Satoshi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 19 pages. |
| Exhibit J-02: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Takahashi, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2007/0095913 (“Takahashi”), Apr. 12, 2019, 23 pages. |
| Exhibit J-03: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Baarman '953, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0259953 (“Baarman '953”), Apr. 12, 2019, 31 pages. |
| Exhibit J-04: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Carobolante, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2015/0115727 (“Carobolante”), Apr. 12, 2019, 12 pages. |
| Exhibit J-05: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Bae, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by United States Patent Publication No. 2016/0156103 (“Bae”), Apr. 12, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Exhibit J-06: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Singh, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960 (“Singh”), Apr. 12, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Exhibit J-07: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Qi 1.0.1, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Qi System Description, Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 1: Low Power, Part 1: Interface Definition, Version 1.0.1 (“Qi 1.0.1”), Apr. 12, 2019, 14 pages. |
| Exhibit J-08 : Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Narayanan, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Application Note: Wireless Power Charging Coil Considerations, by Raghu Narayanan, Wurth Elektronik “'Narayanan”), Apr. 12, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Exhibit J-09: Invalidity Contentions: '729 Patent in View of Barcelo, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.) Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,729 (“The '729 Patent”) by Application Note 138:Wireless Power User Guide, by Trevor Barcelo, Linear Technology (“Barcelo”), Apr. 12, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Exhibit K: Family Patents Combinations, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y ), Invalidity Contentions, Apr. 12, 2019, 103 pages. |
| Exhibit L: '729 Patent Combinations, NuCurrent v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC (S.D.N.Y.), Invalidity Contentions, Apr. 12, 2019, 106 pages. |
| Extended Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2019 for EP 19188841.1-1216, 11 pages. |
| First Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2019 for Chinese App. No. 201680058731.9, English Translation, 6 pages. |
| International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 22, 2011, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2010/000714, filed on Mar. 9, 2010, 9 pages. |
| International Searhing Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 7, 2010, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2010/000714, filed on Mar. 9, 2010, 10 pages. |
| International Searhing Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 8, 2017, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/048708, filed on Aug. 25, 2017, 10 pages. |
| International Searhing Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2016, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2016/045588, filed on Aug. 4, 2016, 9 pages. |
| International Searhing Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 21, 2018, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2017/065329, filed on Dec. 8, 2017, 7 pages. |
| International Searhing Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2016, issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2016/047607, filed on Aug. 18, 2016, 7 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858—Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NuCurrent, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 3,680,960, Mar. 22, 2019, 90 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Preliminary Guidance, Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Paper 48, Aug. 27, 2020, 20 pages. |
| IPR2019-00858, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs. NuCurrent, Inc., Samsung Exhibit 1042-Order Denying [167] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, NuCurrent, Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00798-DLC, Jul. 2, 2019, 15 pages. |
| Barcelo T., “Wireless Power User Guide”, Linear Technology, Application Note 138, Oct. 2013, 8 pages. |
| Burghartz, J., “On the Design of RF Spiral Inductors on Silicon”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 2003, pp. 718-729. |
| CN Office Action, CN Application No. 201910508728.8 dated Dec. 28, 2020, 8 pages. |
| “CN Office Action, CN Application No. 201910508728.8 dated Mar. 27, 2020, 16 pages”. |
| Decision of Dismissal of Amendment issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047048, dated May 8, 2018, 7 pages. |
| EP Communication pursuant to Rule 62 EPC regarding extended European Search Report dated May 15, 2019, for EP App. No. 16835665.7-1212, 16 pages. |
| “EP Office Action, EP Application No. 10751119.8, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 5 pages”. |
| EP Office Action, EP Application No. 19154162.2, dated Oct. 14, 2020, 7 pages. |
| EP Office Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Jan. 17, 2019 for EP App. No. 13001121.6-1216, 4 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2013, issued in connection with EP Application No. 13001121.6, 6 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2013, issued in connection with EP Application No. 13001130.7, 6 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2014, issued in connection with EP Application No. 14000885.5, 8 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 7, 2014, issued in connection with EP Application No. 10751119.8, 12 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 9, 2019, issued in connection with EP Application No. 19188841.1, 10 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 12, 2019, issued in connection with EP Application No. 19154162.2, 9 pages. |
| European Patent Office, Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Feb. 14, 2019, issued in connection with EP Application No. 16835665.7, 10 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, Singh, Apr. 15, 2014, 49 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., Apr. 29, 2014, 49 pages. |
| Ex. 1001 U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046 to Singh et al., Mar. 29, 2016, 50 pages. |
| Ex. 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 10,063,100, Singh, Aug. 28, 2018, 48 pages. |
| Ex. 1003—CV of Dr. Steven B. Leeb, Mar. 22, 2019, 7 pages. |
| Ex. 1004 File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,948 to Singh et al., Apr. 29, 2014, 213 pages. |
| Ex 1004—File History for U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,960, Singh, Mar. 25, 2014, 201 pages. (in two attachments due to size). |
| Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, filed Aug. 7, 2015, Part 1, 475 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, filed Aug. 7, 2015, Part 2, 475 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,157, Part 3, Aug. 7, 2015, 438 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,591, Singh, Apr. 15, 2014, 180 pages. |
| Ex. 1004—Prosecution History of U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,046, Singh, Mar. 29, 2016, 322 pages (in two attachments A and B) due to size. |
| Ex. 1005—U.S. Publication 2014-0035383 to Riehl, Feb. 6, 2014, 11 pages. |
| Ex. 1005—US20070267718A1 to Lee, Nov. 22, 2007, 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1006—Riehl P.S., et al., “Wireless Power Systems for Mobile Devices Supporting Inductive and Resonant Operating Modes,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Therory and Techniques, Mar. 2015, vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 780-790 (17 pages). |
| Ex 1006—Semat—Physics Chapters 29-32, 81 pages, (1958). |
| Ex. 1007 U.S. Publication 2011/0241437 to Kanno, Oct. 6, 2011, 21 pages. |
| Ex. 1008—U.S. Publication 2012/0274148 to Sung et al., Nov. 1, 2012, 13 pages. |
| Ex. 1009—JP Patent No. 2013-93429 to Kazuya, May 16, 2013, 27 pages. |
| Ex 1009—U.S. Pat. No. 20090096413 to Partovi, Apr. 16, 2009, 88 pages. |
| Ex. 1010—IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms, Sixth Edition (1996), 9 pages. |
| Ex. 1010—U.S. Publication No. 2015/0091502 to Mukherjee et al., Apr. 2, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Ex. 1011—KR Patent No. 10-2013-0045307 to Yu, May 3, 2013, 45 pages. |
| Ex. 1011—US20070089773A1 to Koester et al., Apr. 26, 2007, 26 pages. |
| Ex. 1012—US20120280765 to Kurs, Nov. 8, 2012, 122 pages. |
| Ex. 1012—IEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques, New York, NY 1953, 17 pages. |
| Ex. 1012—U.S. Pat. No. 6,432,497 to Bunyan, Aug. 13, 2002, 12 pages. |
| Ex. 1013—ASA, et al., “A Novel Multi-Level Phase-Controlled Resonant Inverter with Common Mode Capacitor for Wireless EV Chargers,” 2015, 6 pages. |
| Ex. 1014 U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,842 to Cheung et al., Jun. 4, 2000, 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1014—Abstract of a Novel Multi-Level Phase-Controlled Resonant Inverter with Common Mode Capacitor for Wireless EV Chargers, IEEE XPlore Digital Library, Jun. 14-17, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Ex. 1015 Reinhold, et al., “Efficient Antenna Design of Inductive Coupled RFID-Systems with High Power Demand,” Journal of Communication, Nov. 2007, vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 14-23. |
| Ex. 1016 U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,042 to Akiba et al., Oct. 22, 1985, 8 pages. |
| Ex. 1018—Wheeler, “Formulas for the Skin Effect,” Proceeding of the I.R.E, Sep. 1942, pp. 412-424. |
| Ex. 1019—Kyriazidou—U.S. Pat. No. 7,236,080, Jun. 26, 2007, 12 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210135348 A1 | May 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61158688 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15227192 | Aug 2016 | US |
| Child | 17150895 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14059100 | Oct 2013 | US |
| Child | 15227192 | US | |
| Parent | 13233686 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Child | 14059100 | US | |
| Parent | 13255659 | US | |
| Child | 13233686 | US |
