This application is a national phase filing claiming the benefit of and priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, filed on May 4, 2018, which claims priority from and the benefit of United Kingdom patent application No. 1707208.3 filed on May 5, 2017. The contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates generally to mass spectrometers and in particular to multi reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometers (MR-TOF-MS) and methods of their use.
A time-of-flight mass spectrometer is a widely used tool of analytical chemistry, characterized by high speed analysis of wide mass ranges. It has been recognized that multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometers (MR-TOF-MS) provide a substantial increase in resolving power by reflecting the ions multiple times so as to extend the flight path of the ions. Such an extension of the ion flight paths has been achieved by reflecting ions between ion mirrors.
SU 1725289 discloses an MR-TOF-MS instrument having an ion mirror arranged on either side of a field-free region. An ion source is arranged in the field-free region, which ejects ions into one of the ion mirrors. The ions are reflected back and forth between the ion mirrors as they drift along the instrument until the ions reach an ion detector. The mass to charge ratio of an ion can then be determined by detecting the time it has taken for the ion to travel from the ion source to the ion detector.
WO 2005/001878 discloses a similar instrument having a set of periodic lenses within the field-free region between the ion mirrors so as to prevent the ion beam diverging significantly in the direction orthogonal to the dimension in which the ions are reflected by the ion mirror, thereby increasing the duty cycle of the spectrometer.
According to a first aspect the present invention provides a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser comprising:
No focusing of the ions is provided in the second dimension (z-dimension) between the ion mirrors, e.g. there are no periodic lenses focussing the ions in the second dimension (z-dimension). As such, each packet of ions expands in the second dimension (z-dimension) as it travels from the ion accelerator to the detector. MR-TOF-MS instruments have conventionally sought to obtain a very high resolution and hence require a high number of reflections between the ion mirrors. Therefore, conventionally it has been considered necessary to provide second dimension (z-dimension) focussing between the ion mirrors to prevent the width of the ion packet diverging to the extent that it becomes larger than the detector width by the time it has completed the high number of mirror reflections and reached the detector. This was considered necessary to maintain an acceptable transmission, and hence sensitivity, of the instrument. Also, if the ion packets diverge too much in the second dimension (z-dimension), then some ions may reach the detector having only been reflected a first number of times, whereas other ions may reach the detector having been reflected a larger number of times. Ions may therefore have significantly different flight path lengths through the field-free region on the way to the detector, which is undesirable in time of flight mass analysers.
However, the inventors of the present invention have realised that if the ion flight path within the instrument is maintained relatively small and the duty cycle (as defined herein below, i.e. D/L) is made relatively high, then the second dimension (z-dimension) focussing can be eliminated whilst maintaining a reasonably high sensitivity and resolution. More specifically, each ion packet that is pulsed out of the ion accelerator expands in the second dimension (z-dimension) as it travels towards the detector, due to thermal velocities of the ions. This is particularly problematic in multi reflecting time-of-flight mass spectrometers because on one hand the ion detector must be relatively short in the second dimension (z-dimension) so that ions do not collide with it until the desired number of ion mirror reflections have been performed, but on the other hand it must be long enough to receive the expanded ion packet. The more the ion packet expands in the second dimension (z-dimension), relative to its original length in this dimension, the more problematic this becomes. The inventors have recognised that by maintaining the initial size of the ion packet (i.e. D) relatively high and the distance between the ion accelerator and the detector (i.e. L) relatively small (i.e. by providing a relatively high duty cycle, D/L), the proportional expansion of the ion packet between the ion accelerator and the detector remains relatively low.
The first aspect of the invention also provides a method of time of flight mass analysis comprising: providing a mass analyser as described above; controlling the ion accelerator so as to accelerate ions into the first ion mirror at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension), wherein the distance in the first dimension (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors is ≤1000 mm, wherein the ions travel a distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector of ≤700 mm, and wherein the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) as they travel from the ion accelerator to the detector; and wherein the ions are detected by the detector and time of flight mass analysed with a duty cycle of ≥5% and a resolution of ≥20,000.
From a second aspect the present invention provides a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser comprising:
The second aspect of the invention also provides a method of time of flight mass analysis comprising: providing a mass analyser as described above; and controlling the ion accelerator so as to accelerate ions into the first ion mirror at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension), wherein the ions are reflected so as to pass from one of the ion mirrors to the other of the ion mirrors n times, and wherein the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) during ≥60% of these n times.
From a third aspect the present invention provides a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser comprising:
an ion accelerator;
two ion mirrors arranged for reflecting ions in a first dimension (x-dimension) and being elongated in a second dimension (z-dimension); and
an ion detector;
wherein the ion accelerator is arranged and configured for accelerating ions into a first of the ion mirrors at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension).
The third aspect of the invention also provides a method of time of flight mass analysis comprising: providing a mass analyser as described above; and controlling the ion accelerator so as to accelerate ions into the first ion mirror at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension).
The spectrometers herein may comprise an ion source selected from the group consisting of: (i) an Electrospray ionisation (“ESI”) ion source; (ii) an Atmospheric Pressure Photo ionisation (“APPI”) ion source; (iii) an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation (“APCI”) ion source; (iv) a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption ionisation (“MALDI”) ion source; (v) a Laser Desorption Ionisation (“LDI”) ion source; (vi) an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation (“API”) ion source; (vii) a Desorption Ionisation on Silicon (“DIOS”) ion source; (viii) an Electron Impact (“EI”) ion source; (ix) a Chemical Ionisation (“CI”) ion source; (x) a Field Ionisation (“FI”) ion source; (xi) a Field Desorption (“FD”) ion source; (xii) an Inductively Coupled Plasma (“ICP”) ion source; (xiii) a Fast Atom Bombardment (“FAB”) ion source; (xiv) a Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (“LSIMS”) ion source; (xv) a Desorption Electrospray Ionisation (“DESI”) ion source; (xvi) a Nickel-63 radioactive ion source; (xvii) an Atmospheric Pressure Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation ion source; (xviii) a Thermospray ion source; (xix) an Atmospheric Sampling Glow Discharge Ionisation (“ASGDI”) ion source; (xx) a Glow Discharge (“GD”) ion source; (xxi) an Impactor ion source; (xxii) a Direct Analysis in Real Time (“DART”) ion source; (xxiii) a Laserspray Ionisation (“LSI”) ion source; (xxiv) a Sonicspray Ionisation (“SSI”) ion source; (xxv) a Matrix Assisted Inlet Ionisation (“MAII”) ion source; (xxvi) a Solvent Assisted Inlet Ionisation (“SAII”) ion source; (xxvii) a Desorption Electrospray Ionisation (“DESI”) ion source; (xxviii) a Laser Ablation Electrospray Ionisation (“LAESI”) ion source; and (xxix) Surface Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation (“SALDI”).
The spectrometer may comprise one or more continuous or pulsed ion sources.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more ion guides.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more ion mobility separation devices and/or one or more Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometer devices.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more ion traps or one or more ion trapping regions.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more collision, fragmentation or reaction cells selected from the group consisting of: (i) a Collisional Induced Dissociation (“CID”) fragmentation device; (ii) a Surface Induced Dissociation (“SID”) fragmentation device; (iii) an Electron Transfer Dissociation (“ETD”) fragmentation device; (iv) an Electron Capture Dissociation (“ECD”) fragmentation device; (v) an Electron Collision or Impact Dissociation fragmentation device; (vi) a Photo Induced Dissociation (“PID”) fragmentation device; (vii) a Laser Induced Dissociation fragmentation device; (viii) an infrared radiation induced dissociation device; (ix) an ultraviolet radiation induced dissociation device; (x) a nozzle-skimmer interface fragmentation device; (xi) an in-source fragmentation device; (xii) an in-source Collision Induced Dissociation fragmentation device; (xiii) a thermal or temperature source fragmentation device; (xiv) an electric field induced fragmentation device; (xv) a magnetic field induced fragmentation device; (xvi) an enzyme digestion or enzyme degradation fragmentation device; (xvii) an ion-ion reaction fragmentation device; (xviii) an ion-molecule reaction fragmentation device; (xix) an ion-atom reaction fragmentation device; (xx) an ion-metastable ion reaction fragmentation device; (xxi) an ion-metastable molecule reaction fragmentation device; (xxii) an ion-metastable atom reaction fragmentation device; (xxiii) an ion-ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxiv) an ion-molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxv) an ion-atom reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxvi) an ion-metastable ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxvii) an ion-metastable molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxviii) an ion-metastable atom reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; and (xxix) an Electron Ionisation Dissociation (“EID”) fragmentation device.
The ion-molecule reaction device may be configured to perform ozonlysis for the location of olefinic (double) bonds in lipids.
The spectrometer may comprise a mass analyser selected from the group consisting of: (i) a quadrupole mass analyser; (ii) a 2D or linear quadrupole mass analyser; (iii) a Paul or 3D quadrupole mass analyser; (iv) a Penning trap mass analyser; (v) an ion trap mass analyser; (vi) a magnetic sector mass analyser; (vii) Ion Cyclotron Resonance (“ICR”) mass analyser; (viii) a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance (“FTICR”) mass analyser; (ix) an electrostatic mass analyser arranged to generate an electrostatic field having a quadro-logarithmic potential distribution; (x) a Fourier Transform electrostatic mass analyser; and (xi) a Fourier Transform mass analyser.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more energy analysers or electrostatic energy analysers.
The spectrometer may comprise one or more mass filters selected from the group consisting of: (i) a quadrupole mass filter; (ii) a 2D or linear quadrupole ion trap; (iii) a Paul or 3D quadrupole ion trap; (iv) a Penning ion trap; (v) an ion trap; (vi) a magnetic sector mass filter; (vii) a Time of Flight mass filter; and (viii) a Wien filter.
The spectrometer may comprise a device or ion gate for pulsing ions; and/or a device for converting a substantially continuous ion beam into a pulsed ion beam.
The spectrometer may comprise a C-trap and a mass analyser comprising an outer barrel-like electrode and a coaxial inner spindle-like electrode that form an electrostatic field with a quadro-logarithmic potential distribution, wherein in a first mode of operation ions are transmitted to the C-trap and are then injected into the mass analyser and wherein in a second mode of operation ions are transmitted to the C-trap and then to a collision cell or Electron Transfer Dissociation device wherein at least some ions are fragmented into fragment ions, and wherein the fragment ions are then transmitted to the C-trap before being injected into the mass analyser.
The spectrometer may comprise a stacked ring ion guide comprising a plurality of electrodes each having an aperture through which ions are transmitted in use and wherein the spacing of the electrodes increases along the length of the ion path, and wherein the apertures in the electrodes in an upstream section of the ion guide have a first diameter and wherein the apertures in the electrodes in a downstream section of the ion guide have a second diameter which is smaller than the first diameter, and wherein opposite phases of an AC or RF voltage are applied, in use, to successive electrodes.
The spectrometer may comprise a device arranged and adapted to supply an AC or RF voltage to the electrodes. The AC or RF voltage optionally has an amplitude selected from the group consisting of: (i) about <50 V peak to peak; (ii) about 50-100 V peak to peak; (iii) about 100-150 V peak to peak; (iv) about 150-200 V peak to peak; (v) about 200-250 V peak to peak; (vi) about 250-300 V peak to peak; (vii) about 300-350 V peak to peak; (viii) about 350-400 V peak to peak; (ix) about 400-450 V peak to peak; (x) about 450-500 V peak to peak; and (xi) >about 500 V peak to peak.
The AC or RF voltage may have a frequency selected from the group consisting of: (i) <about 100 kHz; (ii) about 100-200 kHz; (iii) about 200-300 kHz; (iv) about 300-400 kHz; (v) about 400-500 kHz; (vi) about 0.5-1.0 MHz; (vii) about 1.0-1.5 MHz; (viii) about 1.5-2.0 MHz; (ix) about 2.0-2.5 MHz; (x) about 2.5-3.0 MHz; (xi) about 3.0-3.5 MHz; (xii) about 3.5-4.0 MHz; (xiii) about 4.0-4.5 MHz; (xiv) about 4.5-5.0 MHz; (xv) about 5.0-5.5 MHz; (xvi) about 5.5-6.0 MHz; (xvii) about 6.0-6.5 MHz; (xviii) about 6.5-7.0 MHz; (xix) about 7.0-7.5 MHz; (xx) about 7.5-8.0 MHz; (xxi) about 8.0-8.5 MHz; (xxii) about 8.5-9.0 MHz; (xxiii) about 9.0-9.5 MHz; (xxiv) about 9.5-10.0 MHz; and (xxv) >about 10.0 MHz.
The spectrometer may comprise a chromatography or other separation device upstream of an ion source. The chromatography separation device may comprise a liquid chromatography or gas chromatography device. Alternatively, the separation device may comprise: (i) a Capillary Electrophoresis (“CE”) separation device; (ii) a Capillary Electrochromatography (“CEC”) separation device; (iii) a substantially rigid ceramic-based multilayer microfluidic substrate (“ceramic tile”) separation device; or (iv) a supercritical fluid chromatography separation device.
The ion guide may be maintained at a pressure selected from the group consisting of: (i) <about 0.0001 mbar; (ii) about 0.0001-0.001 mbar; (iii) about 0.001-0.01 mbar; (iv) about 0.01-0.1 mbar; (v) about 0.1-1 mbar; (vi) about 1-10 mbar; (vii) about 10-100 mbar; (viii) about 100-1000 mbar; and (ix) >about 1000 mbar.
Analyte ions may be subjected to Electron Transfer Dissociation (“ETD”) fragmentation in an Electron Transfer Dissociation fragmentation device. Analyte ions may be caused to interact with ETD reagent ions within an ion guide or fragmentation device.
The spectrometer may be operated in various modes of operation including a mass spectrometry (“MS”) mode of operation; a tandem mass spectrometry (“MS/MS”) mode of operation; a mode of operation in which parent or precursor ions are alternatively fragmented or reacted so as to produce fragment or product ions, and not fragmented or reacted or fragmented or reacted to a lesser degree; a Multiple Reaction Monitoring (“MRM”) mode of operation; a Data Dependent Analysis (“DDA”) mode of operation; a Data Independent Analysis (“DIA”) mode of operation a Quantification mode of operation or an Ion Mobility Spectrometry (“IMS”) mode of operation.
Various embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In use, the ion source 1 accelerates ions into a first of the ion mirrors 10 at an inclination angle to the x-axis. The ions therefore have a velocity in the x-dimension and also a drift velocity in the z-dimension. The ions enter into the first ion mirror 10 and are reflected back towards the second of the ion mirrors 10. The ions then enter the second mirror and are reflected back to the first ion mirror. The first ion mirror then reflects the ions back to the second ion mirror. This continues and the ions are continually reflected between the two ion mirrors as they drift along the device in the z-dimension until the ions impact upon ion detector 2. The ions therefore follow a substantially sinusoidal mean trajectory within the x-z plane between the ion source 1 and the ion detector 2.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to an MR-TOF-MS instrument not having a set of lenses 23 within the field-free region between the ion mirrors.
According to a first aspect the present invention provides a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser comprising:
an ion accelerator;
two ion mirrors arranged for reflecting ions in a first dimension (x-dimension) and being elongated in a second dimension (z-dimension); and
an ion detector;
wherein the ion accelerator is arranged and configured for accelerating ions into a first of the ion mirrors at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension);
wherein the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) as they travel from the ion accelerator to the detector; and
wherein the mass analyser has a duty cycle of ≥5%, a resolution of ≥20,000, wherein the distance in the first dimension (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors is ≤1000 mm; and wherein the mass analyser is configured such that the ions travel a distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector of ≤700 mm.
Although the term “duty cycle” is well understood to the person skilled in the art, for the avoidance of doubt, duty cycle is the proportion of time that ions from a continuous ion source are accepted into a mass analyser. For orthogonal acceleration ion accelerators, such as those according to the embodiments of the invention, the duty cycle is given by:
where D is the length in the second dimension (z-dimension) of the ion packet when it is orthogonally accelerated by the ion accelerator (i.e. the length in second dimension of the orthogonal acceleration region of the ion accelerator); L is the distance, in the second dimension, from the centre of the orthogonal acceleration region of the ion accelerator to the centre of the detection region of the ion detector; (m/z) is the mass to charge ratio of an ion being analysed; and (m/z)max is the maximum mass to charge ratio of interest desired to be analysed.
It is therefore apparent that the duty cycle of the mass analyser is mass dependent. This is because ions of higher mass to charge ratio take longer to pass through and fill the extraction region of the ion accelerator. However, when describing a mass analyser, the skilled person considers the duty cycle of the mass analyser to be the duty cycle for the maximum mass to charge ratio of interest, i.e. the duty cycle when (m/z)=(m/z)max in the equation above. Accordingly, when duty cycle is referred to herein, it refers to the ratio of D/L (as a percentage), which is a value defined purely by the geometric parameters D and L of the mass analyser. This may also be known as the “sampling efficiency”.
Also, for the avoidance of doubt, the term resolution used herein has its normal meaning in the art, i.e. m/(A m) at FWHM, where m is mass to charge ratio.
The following features are disclosed in relation to the first aspect of the invention.
Each mirror may have at least four electrodes arranged and configured such that the first order time of flight focussing of ions is substantially independent of the position of the ions in the plane orthogonal to the first dimension (y-z plane).
Therefore, the first order time of flight focussing of ions may be substantially independent of the position of the ions in both the second dimension (z-dimension) and a third dimension (y-dimension) that is orthogonal to the first and second dimensions (x and z dimensions).
The mass analyser may comprise voltage sources for applying at least four different voltages to the four different electrodes in each ion mirror for reflecting ions and achieving said time of flight focussing.
The ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) as they travel from the ion accelerator to the detector. As such, ion lenses are not provided between the ion mirrors for spatially focussing ions in the second dimension (z-dimension). Similarly, the ion mirrors are not configured to spatially focus the ions in the second dimension (z-dimension).
The ion detector may be spaced from the ion accelerator in the second dimension (z-dimension). Alternatively, the ions may travel from the ion accelerator in a first direction in the second dimension (z-dimension) and may then be reflected by a reflecting electrode so as to travel in a second, opposite direction in the second dimension (z-dimension) to the detector. One or more further reflection electrodes may be provided to cause one or more further z-dimension reflections, with the detector positioned appropriately to detect the ions after these z-dimension reflections.
Embodiments of the invention provide a spectrometer comprising the mass analyser described herein.
The spectrometer may comprise an ion source for supplying said ions to the ion accelerator, wherein the ion source is arranged such that said ion accelerator receives ions from the ion source travelling in the second dimension (z-dimension).
This arrangement provides the mass analyser with a relatively high duty cycle. As described above, the duty cycle is the ratio of length in second dimension (z-dimension) of the ion packet, when it is accelerated by the ion accelerator, to the distance from the centre of the ion accelerator to the centre of the detector. The embodiments of the invention relate to a relatively small mass analyser and therefore it is desired for the ion accelerator to pulse out a relatively elongated ion packet (in the second, z-dimension) in order to achieve a relatively high duty cycle. The relatively elongated ion packet in the second dimension (z-dimension) is facilitated by providing the ions to the ion accelerator travelling in the second dimension (z-dimension). This is contrary to conventional multi-reflecting TOF spectrometers, in which the ion packet is desired to be maintained very small in the second dimension (z-dimension) so that a high number of ion mirror reflections can be performed before the ion packets diverge in the second dimension (z-dimension) to the extent that they overlap in the second dimension (z-dimension). In order to achieve this, such conventional instruments provide the ions to the ion accelerator in a direction corresponding to a third dimension that is perpendicular to the first and second dimensions described herein. Consequently, such conventional instruments suffer from a relatively low duty cycle.
The ion source may be a continuous ion source for substantially continually generating ions, or may be a pulsed ion source.
The mass analyser may have a duty cycle of ≥10%.
As described above, the mass analyser has a duty cycle of ≥5%. It is contemplated that the mass analyser may have a duty cycle of: ≥6%, ≥7%, ≥8%, ≥9%, ≥10%, ≥11%, ≥12%, ≥13%, ≥14%, ≥15%, ≥16%, ≥17%, ≥18%, ≥19%, ≥20%, ≥25%, ≥30%. Additionally, or alternatively, it is contemplated that the mass analyser may have a duty cycle of: ≤30%, ≤25%, ≤20%, ≤19%, ≤18%, ≤17%, ≤16%, ≤15%, ≤14%, ≤13%, ≤12%, ≤11%, ≤10%, ≤9%, ≤8%, ≤7%, or ≤6%.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the duty cycle may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the duty cycle listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the duty cycle may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: resolution; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or number of reflections; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or electric field strength; and/or kinetic energy.
The mass analyser may be configured such that the ions travel a first distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector, wherein the ion accelerator is arranged and configured to pulse packets of ions having an initial length in the second dimension (z-dimension), and wherein the first distance and initial length are such that the spectrometer has a duty cycle of ≥5%.
However, the first distance and initial length may be arranged such that the duty cycle is any of the other ranges of duty cycle disclosed herein.
The mass analyser may have a resolution of ≥30,000.
However, it is contemplated that the mass analyser may have a resolution of: ≥22000, ≥24000, ≥26000, ≥28000, ≥30000, ≥35000, ≥40000, ≥45000, ≥50000, ≥60000, ≥70000, ≥80000, ≥90000, or ≥100000. Additionally, or alternatively, it is contemplated that the mass analyser may have a resolution of: ≤100000, 5 90000, ≤80000, ≤70000, ≤60000, ≤50000, ≤45000, ≤40000, ≤35000, ≤30000, ≤28000, ≤26000, ≤24000, or ≤22000.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the resolution may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the resolution listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the resolution may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or number of reflections; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or electric field strength; and/or kinetic energy.
The distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector may be one of: ≤650 mm; ≤600 mm; ≤550 mm; ≤500 mm; ≤480 mm; ≤460 mm; ≤440 mm; ≤420 mm; ≤400 mm; ≤380 mm; ≤360 mm; ≤340 mm; ≤320 mm; ≤300 mm; ≤280 mm; ≤260 mm; ≤240 mm; ≤220 mm; or ≤200 mm; and/or the first distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector may be one of: ≥100 mm; ≥120 mm; ≥140 mm; ≥160 mm; ≥180 mm; ≥200 mm; ≥220 mm; ≥240 mm; ≥260 mm; ≥280 mm; ≥300 mm; ≥320 mm; ≥340 mm; ≥360 mm; ≥380 mm; or ≥400 mm. Any one of these listed upper end points of the first distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the first distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) that are listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the distance from the ion accelerator to the detector may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or resolution; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or number of reflections; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or electric field strength; and/or kinetic energy.
The distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be: ≤950 mm; ≤900 mm; ≤850 mm; ≤800 mm; ≤750 mm; ≤700 mm; ≤650 mm; ≤600 mm; ≤550 mm; ≤500 mm; ≤450 mm; or ≤400 mm; and/or the distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be: ≥350 mm; ≥360 mm; ≥380 mm; ≥400 mm; ≥450 mm; ≥500 mm; ≥550 mm; ≥600 mm; ≥650 mm; ≥700 mm; ≥750 mm; ≥800 mm; ≥850 mm; or ≥900 mm.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the distance between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the distance between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors that are listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the distance between the points of reflection may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or resolution; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or number of reflections; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or electric field strength; and/or kinetic energy.
The ion accelerator, ion mirrors and detector may be arranged and configured so that the ions are reflected at least x times by the ion mirrors as the travel from the ion accelerator to the detector; wherein x is: ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, ≥5, ≥6, ≥7, ≥8, ≥9, ≥10, ≥11, ≥12, ≥13, ≥14, or ≥15; and/or wherein x is: ≤15; ≤14; ≤13; ≤12; ≤11; ≤10; ≤9; ≤8; ≤7; ≤6; ≤5; ≤4; ≤3; or ≤2; and/or wherein x is 3-10; wherein x is 4-9; wherein x is 5-10; wherein x is 3-6; wherein x is 4-5; or; wherein x is 5-6.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the number of reflections may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the number of reflections that are listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the number of reflections may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or resolution; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or electric field strength; and/or kinetic energy.
The ions may travel between 100 mm and 450 mm in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; wherein the distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be between 350 and 950 mm; and wherein the ions may be reflected between 2 and 15 times by the ion mirrors as the travel from the ion accelerator to the detector.
Alternatively, the ions may travel between 150 mm and 400 mm in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; wherein the distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be between 400 and 900 mm; and wherein the ions may be reflected between 3 and 10 times by the ion mirrors as the travel from the ion accelerator to the detector. Alternatively, the ions may travel between 150 mm and 350 mm in the second dimension (z-dimension). Alternatively, or additionally, the distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be between 400 and 600 mm.
It is contemplated that the ions may travel between 100 mm and 400 mm in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; wherein the distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors may be between 300 and 700 mm; and wherein the ions may be reflected between 3 and 6 times by the ion mirrors as the travel from the ion accelerator to the detector. Alternatively, the ions may travel between 150 mm and 350 mm in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector. Alternatively, or additionally, the distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors is between 400 and 600 mm. Additionally, or instead of either one of both of these parameters, the ions may be reflected between 4 and 5 times, or between 5 and 6 times, by the ion mirrors as the travel from the ion accelerator to the detector.
The spectrometer may be configured to cause the ions to travel in the second dimension (z-dimension) with an energy of: ≤140 eV; ≤120 eV; ≤100 eV; ≤90 eV; ≤80 eV; ≤70 eV; ≤60 eV; ≤50 eV; ≤40 eV; ≤30 eV; ≤20 eV; or ≤10 eV; and/or the spectrometer may be configured to cause the ions to travel in the second dimension (z-dimension) with an energy of: ≥120 eV; ≥100 eV; ≥90 eV; ≥80 eV; ≥70 eV; ≥60 eV; ≥50 eV; ≥40 eV; ≥30 eV; ≥20 eV; or ≥10 eV. The spectrometer may be configured to cause the ions to travel in the second dimension (z-dimension) with an energy between: 15-70 eV; 10-65 eV; 10-60 eV; 20-100 eV; 25-100 eV; 20-90 eV; 40-60 eV; 30-50 eV; 20-30 eV; 20-45 eV; 25-40 eV; 15-40 eV; 10-45 eV; or 10-25 eV.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the energy may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the energy that are listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the energy in the second dimension may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or resolution; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or number of reflections; and/or electric field strength; and/or kinetic energy.
The ranges of resolution, duty cycle and size of the mass analyser (i.e. the distance in the first direction between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors, and the distance travelled between the ion accelerator and detector in the second dimension) described herein are for practical values of Time of Flight energies and mirror voltages.
The ion accelerator may be configured to generate an electric field of y V/mm for accelerating the ions; wherein y is: ≥700; ≥650; ≥600; ≥580; ≥560; ≥540; ≥520; ≥500; ≥480; ≥460; ≥440; ≥420; ≥400; ≥380; ≥360; ≥340; ≥320; ≥300; ≥280; ≥260; ≥240; 220; or ≥200; and/or wherein y is: ≤700; ≤650; ≤600; ≤580; ≤560; ≤540; ≤520; ≤500; ≤480; ≤460; ≤440; ≤420; ≤400; ≤380; ≤360; ≤340; ≤320; ≤300; ≤280; ≤260; ≤240; ≤220; or ≤200.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the electric field may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the electric field that are listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the electric field strength may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or resolution; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or number of reflections; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or kinetic energy.
A region substantially free of electric fields may be arranged between the ion mirrors such that when the ions are reflected between the ion mirrors they travel through said region.
The ions may have a kinetic energy E, when between the ion mirrors and/or in said region substantially free of electric fields; wherein E is: ≥1 keV; ≥2 keV; ≥3 keV; ≥4 keV; ≥5 keV; ≥6 keV; ≥7 keV; ≥8 keV; ≥9 keV; ≥10 keV; ≥11 keV; ≥12 keV; ≥13 keV; ≥14 keV; or ≥15 keV; and/or wherein E is ≤15 keV; ≤14 keV; ≤13 keV; ≤12 keV; ≤11 keV; ≤10 keV; ≤9 keV; ≤8 keV; ≤7 keV; ≤6 keV; or ≤5 keV; and/or between 5 and 10 keV.
Any one of these listed upper end points of the kinetic energy may be combined with any one of the lower end points of the kinetic energy that are listed above (where the upper end point is higher than the lower end point. Any one or combination of these end points may also be combined with any one of the ranges (or combination or ranges) described in relation to any one, or any combination, of the other parameters discussed herein. For example, any one or combination of the end points or ranges described in relation to the kinetic energy may be combined with any one or any combination of ranges described in relation to: duty cycle; and/or resolution; and/or distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector; and/or distance in the first direction (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors; and/or number of reflections; and/or ion energy in the second dimension; and/or electric field strength.
The spectrometer may comprise an ion guide for guiding ions into the ion accelerator and a heater 39 for heating said ion guide.
The spectrometer may comprise a heater for heating electrodes of the ion accelerator.
The spectrometer may comprise a heater arranged and configured to heat the ion guide and/or accelerator to a temperature of: ≥100° C., ≥110° C., ≥120° C., ≥130° C., ≥140° C., or ≥150° C. Heating the various components as described herein may assist in reducing interface charging.
The ion accelerator disclosed herein may be a gridless ion accelerator. If the ion accelerator is heated, then a gridless ion accelerator does not suffer from sagging of the grid that would otherwise be caused by the heating.
The spectrometer may comprise a collimator for collimating the ions passing towards the ion accelerator, the collimator configured to collimate ions in the first dimension (x-dimension) and/or a dimension (y-dimension) orthogonal to both the first and second dimensions.
The spectrometer may comprise ion optics 33 arranged and configured to expand the ion beam passing towards the ion accelerator in the first dimension (x-dimension) and/or a dimension (y-dimension) orthogonal to both the first and second dimensions.
The spectrometer may comprise an ion separator for separating ion spatially, or according to mass to chare ratio or ion mobility, in the second dimension (z-dimension) prior to the ions entering the ion accelerator.
From a second aspect the present invention provides a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser comprising:
an ion accelerator;
two ion mirrors arranged for reflecting ions in a first dimension (x-dimension) and being elongated in a second dimension (z-dimension); and
an ion detector;
wherein the ion accelerator is arranged and configured for accelerating ions into a first of the ion mirrors at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension); and
wherein the ions are reflected so as to pass from one of the ion mirrors to the other of the ion mirrors n times, and wherein the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) during ≥60% of these n times.
The mass analyser according to said second aspect may have any of the features disclosed herein in relation to said first aspect, except wherein the mass analyser may or may not be limited to the ions not being spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) as they travel from the ion accelerator to the detector (e.g. during the entire flight from the ion accelerator to the detector), as described in relation to the first aspect. It is contemplated that there may be some spatial focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) between some of the mirror reflections. Therefore, according to the second aspect of the invention, the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) during ≥60% of said n times. Optionally, the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) during ≥65%, ≥70%, ≥75%, ≥80%, ≥85%, ≥90%, ≥ or 95% of said n times.
The mass analyser according to said second aspect may have any of the features disclosed herein in relation to said first aspect, except wherein the mass analyser may or may not be limited to the duty cycle being ≥5%, as described in relation to the first aspect.
The mass analyser according to said second aspect may have any of the features disclosed herein in relation to said first aspect, except wherein the mass analyser may or may not be limited to the resolution being ≥20,000, as described in relation to the first aspect.
The mass analyser according to said second aspect may have any of the features disclosed herein in relation to said first aspect, except wherein the mass analyser may or may not be limited to said distance in the first dimension (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors being ≤1000 mm, as described in relation to the first aspect
The mass analyser according to said second aspect may have any of the features disclosed herein in relation to said first aspect, except wherein the mass analyser may or may not be limited to the distance the ions travel in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector being ≤700 mm, as described in relation to the first aspect.
The first aspect of the invention also provides a method of time of flight mass analysis comprising:
providing a mass analyser as described in relation to said first aspect of the invention; and
controlling the ion accelerator so as to accelerate ions into the first ion mirror at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension), wherein the distance in the first dimension (x-dimension) between points of reflection in the two ion mirrors is ≤1000 mm, wherein the ions travel a distance in the second dimension (z-dimension) from the ion accelerator to the detector of ≤700 mm, and wherein the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) as they travel from the ion accelerator to the detector;
wherein the ions are detected by the detector and time of flight mass analysed with a duty cycle of ≥5% and a resolution of ≥20,000.
The second aspect of the invention also provides a method of time of flight mass analysis comprising:
providing a mass analyser as described in relation to said second aspect of the invention; and
controlling the ion accelerator so as to accelerate ions into the first ion mirror at an angle to the first dimension such that the ions are repeatedly reflected between the ion mirrors in the first dimension (x-dimension) as they travel in the second dimension (z-dimension), wherein the ions are reflected so as to pass from one of the ion mirrors to the other of the ion mirrors n times, and wherein the ions are not spatially focussed in the second dimension (z-dimension) during ≥60% of these n times.
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings in order to assist in the understanding of the invention.
In use, ions are supplied to the ion entrance 30, either as a continuous ion beam or an intermittent or pulsed manner. The ions are desirably transmitted into the ion entrance along an axis aligned with the z-dimension. This allows the duty cycle of the instrument to remain high. However, it is contemplated that the ions could be introduced along an entrance axis that is aligned with the y-dimension. The ions pass from the ion entrance to the ion accelerator 34, which pulses the ions (e.g. periodically) in the x-dimension such that packets of ions 31 travel in the x-dimension towards and into a first of the ion mirrors 36. The ions retain a component of velocity in the z-dimension from that which they had when passing into the ion accelerator 34, or a provided with such a component of velocity in the z-dimension (e.g. if the ion entered the ion accelerator along the y-dimension). As such, ions are injected into the time of flight region 40 of the instrument at a small angle of inclination to the x-dimension, with a major velocity component in the x-dimension towards the ion mirror 36 and a minor velocity component in the z-dimension towards the detector 38.
The ions pass into a first of the ion mirrors and are reflected back towards the second of the ion mirrors. The ions pass through the field-free region 40 between the mirrors 38 as they travel towards the second ion mirror and they separate according to their mass to charge ratios in the known manner that occurs in time of flight mass analysers. The ions then enter the second mirror and are reflected back to the first ion mirror, again passing through the field-free region between the mirrors as they travel towards the first ion mirror. The first ion mirror then reflects the ions back to the second ion mirror. This continues and the ions are continually reflected between the two ion mirrors as they drift along the device in the z-dimension until the ions impact upon ion detector. The ions therefore follow a substantially sinusoidal mean trajectory within the x-z plane between the ion source and the ion detector. Although four ion reflections are shown in
The time that has elapsed between a given ion being pulsed from the ion accelerator to the time that the ion is detected may be determined and used, along with the knowledge of the flight path length, to calculate the mass to charge ratio of that ion.
As described above, when duty cycle is referred to herein it refers to the ratio of D/L (as a percentage), where D is the length in the z-dimension of the ion packet 31 when it is orthogonally accelerated by the ion accelerator 34 (i.e. the length in z-dimension of the orthogonal acceleration region of the ion accelerator 31), and L is the distance in the z-dimension from the centre of the orthogonal acceleration region of the ion accelerator 34 to the centre of the detection region of the ion detector 38.
No focusing of the ions is provided in the z-dimension between the ion mirrors, e.g. there are no periodic lenses focussing the ions in the z-dimension. As such, each packet of ions expands in the z-dimension as it travels from the ion accelerator to the detector. MR-TOF-MS instruments have conventionally sought to obtain a very high resolution and hence require a high number of reflections between the ion mirrors. Therefore, conventionally it has been considered necessary to provide z-dimension focussing between the ion mirrors to prevent the width of the ion packet diverging to the extent that it becomes larger than the detector width by the time it has completed the high number of mirror reflections and reached the detector. This was considered necessary to maintain an acceptable sensitivity of the instrument. Also, if the ion packets diverge too much in the z-dimension, then some ions may reach the detector having only been reflected a first number of times, whereas other ions may reach the detector having been reflected a larger number of times. Ions may therefore have significantly different flight path lengths through the field-free region on the way to the detector, which is undesirable in time of flight mass analysers. However, the inventors of the present invention have realised that if the ion flight path within the instrument is maintained relatively small and the duty cycle (i.e. D/L) made relatively high, then the z-dimension focussing can be eliminated.
Therefore, the distance S between the points of reflection in the two ion mirrors is maintained relatively small, and the distance W that the ions travel in the z-dimension from the ion accelerator to the detector is maintained relatively small.
It is contemplated that collimators may be provided to collimate the ions packets in the z-dimension as they travel from the ion accelerator to the detector. This ensures that all ions perform the same number of reflections in the ion mirrors between the ion accelerator and detector (i.e. prevents aliasing at the detector).
Optionally, each ion mirror may have at least four electrodes to which four different (non-grounded) voltages are applied. Each ion mirror may comprise additional electrodes, which may be grounded or maintained at the same voltages as other electrodes in the mirror. Each mirror optionally has at least four electrodes arranged and configured such that the first order time of flight focussing of ions is substantially independent of the position of the ions in the y-z plane, i.e. independent of the position of the ions in both the y-dimension and z-dimension (to the first order approximation).
The ion entrance may receive ions from an ion guide 33 that may, for example, collimate the ions in the y-dimension and/or x-dimension, e.g. using a slit collimator. The ion guide may be heated, e.g. to ≥100° C., ≥110° C., ≥120° C., ≥130° C., ≥140° C., or ≥150° C.
It is contemplated that the ion beam may be expanded in the y-dimension and/or x-dimension prior to entering the ion accelerator 34. Alternatively, or additionally, the ions may be separated in the z-dimension prior to entering the ion accelerator 34.
The electrodes of the ion accelerator 34 may be heated, e.g. to ≥100° C., ≥110° C., ≥120° C., ≥130° C., ≥140° C., or ≥150° C. Alternatively, or additionally, a gridless ion accelerator be used. If the ion accelerator is heated, then a gridless ion accelerator does not suffer from sagging of the grid that would otherwise be caused by the heating.
Heating the various components as described herein may assist in reducing interface charging.
Although the ion accelerator 34 has been described as receiving a beam of ions, it is contemplated that the ion accelerator may alternatively comprise a pulsed ion source.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1707208 | May 2017 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2018/051206 | 5/4/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/203082 | 11/8/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3898452 | Hertel | Aug 1975 | A |
4390784 | Browning et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4691160 | Ino | Sep 1987 | A |
4731532 | Frey et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4855595 | Blanchard | Aug 1989 | A |
5017780 | Kutscher et al. | May 1991 | A |
5107109 | Stafford, Jr. et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5128543 | Reed et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5202563 | Cotter et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5331158 | Dowell | Jul 1994 | A |
5367162 | Holland et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5396065 | Myerholtz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5435309 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5464985 | Cornish et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5619034 | Reed et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654544 | Dresch | Aug 1997 | A |
5689111 | Dresch et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696375 | Park et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719392 | Franzen | Feb 1998 | A |
5763878 | Franzen | Jun 1998 | A |
5777326 | Rockwood et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5834771 | Yoon et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847385 | Dresch | Dec 1998 | A |
5869829 | Dresch | Feb 1999 | A |
5955730 | Kerley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5994695 | Young | Nov 1999 | A |
6002122 | Wolf | Dec 1999 | A |
6013913 | Hanson | Jan 2000 | A |
6020586 | Dresch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6080985 | Welkie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6107625 | Park | Aug 2000 | A |
6160256 | Ishihara | Dec 2000 | A |
6198096 | Le Cocq | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229142 | Bateman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271917 | Hagler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300626 | Brock et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316768 | Rockwood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337482 | Francke | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6384410 | Kawato | May 2002 | B1 |
6393367 | Tang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6437325 | Reilly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455845 | Li et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469295 | Park | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489610 | Barofsky et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504148 | Hager | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6504150 | Verentchikov | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534764 | Verentchikov et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545268 | Verentchikov et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570152 | Hoyes | May 2003 | B1 |
6576895 | Park | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580070 | Cornish et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591121 | Madarasz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614020 | Cornish | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627877 | Davis et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646252 | Gonin | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647347 | Roushall et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664545 | Kimmel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683299 | Fuhrer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694284 | Nikoonahad et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717132 | Franzen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734968 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6737642 | Syage et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744040 | Park | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6744042 | Zajfman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747271 | Gonin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770870 | Vestal | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782342 | LeGore et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787760 | Belay et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794643 | Russ, IV et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804003 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6815673 | Plomley et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833544 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836742 | Brekenfeld | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841936 | Keller et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6861645 | Franzen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864479 | Davis et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870156 | Rather | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870157 | Zare | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6872938 | Makarov et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888130 | Gonin | May 2005 | B1 |
6900431 | Belov et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6906320 | Sachs et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6940066 | Makarov et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949736 | Ishihara | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7034292 | Whitehouse et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7071464 | Reinhold | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084393 | Fuhrer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091479 | Hayek | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7126114 | Chernushevich | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7196324 | Verentchikov | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7217919 | Boyle et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221251 | Menegoli et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7326925 | Verentchikov et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351958 | Vestal | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365313 | Fuhrer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7385187 | Verentchikov et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388197 | McLean et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399957 | Parker et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423259 | Hidalgo et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7498569 | Ding | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501621 | Willis et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504620 | Sato et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521671 | Kirihara et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7541576 | Belay et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7582864 | Verentchikov | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608817 | Flory | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7663100 | Vestal | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675031 | Konicek et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709789 | Vestal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728289 | Naya et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745780 | McLean et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755036 | Satoh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772547 | Verentchikov | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800054 | Fuhrer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7825373 | Willis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7863557 | Brown | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884319 | Willis et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7932491 | Vestal | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7982184 | Sudakov | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985950 | Makarov et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7989759 | Holle | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7999223 | Makarov et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017907 | Willis et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8017909 | Makarov et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8063360 | Willis et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080782 | Hidalgo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8093554 | Makarov | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8237111 | Golikov et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8354634 | Green et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373120 | Verentchikov | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395115 | Makarov et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8492710 | Fuhrer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8513594 | Makarov | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8633436 | Ugarov | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8637815 | Makarov et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8642948 | Makarov et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8642951 | Li | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8648294 | Prather et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8653446 | Mordehai et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8658984 | Makarov et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8680481 | Giannakopulos et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8723108 | Ugarov | May 2014 | B1 |
8735818 | Kovtoun et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8772708 | Kinugawa et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8785845 | Loboda | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8847155 | Vestal | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8853623 | Verenchikov | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8884220 | Hoyes et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8921772 | Verenchikov | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8952325 | Giles et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8957369 | Makarov | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8975592 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9048080 | Verenchikov et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9082597 | Willis et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9082604 | Verenchikov | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9099287 | Giannakopulos | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9136101 | Grinfeld et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147563 | Makarov | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9196469 | Makarov | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9207206 | Makarov | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9214322 | Kholomeev et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9214328 | Hoyes et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9281175 | Haufler et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312119 | Verenchikov | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9324544 | Rather | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9373490 | Nishiguchi et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9396922 | Verenchikov et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9417211 | Verenchikov | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9425034 | Verentchikov et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9472390 | Verenchikov et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9514922 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9576778 | Wang | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9595431 | Verenchikov | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9673033 | Grinfeld et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9679758 | Grinfeld et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9683963 | Verenchikov | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9728384 | Verenchikov | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9779923 | Verenchikov | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786484 | Willis et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9786485 | Ding et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9865441 | Damoc et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865445 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9870903 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9870906 | Quarmby et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9881780 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9899201 | Park | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9922812 | Makarov | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941107 | Verenchikov | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972483 | Makarov | May 2018 | B2 |
10006892 | Verenchikov | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10037873 | Wang et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10141175 | Verentchikov et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10141176 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10163616 | Verenchikov et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10186411 | Makarov | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10192723 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10290480 | Crowell et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10373815 | Crowell et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10388503 | Brown et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10593525 | Hock et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10593533 | Hoyes et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10622203 | Veryovkin | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10629425 | Hoyes et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636646 | Hoyes et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20010011703 | Framzen | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010030284 | Dresch et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020030159 | Chernushevich et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020107660 | Nikoonahad et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020190199 | Li et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010907 | Hayek et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030111597 | Gonin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030232445 | Fulghum | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040026613 | Bateman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084613 | Bateman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040108453 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119012 | Vestal | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040144918 | Zare et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155187 | Axelsson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159782 | Park | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183007 | Belov et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006577 | Fuhrer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050040326 | Enke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103992 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050133712 | Belov et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151075 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194528 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242279 | Verentchikov | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258364 | Whitehouse et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060169882 | Pau et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214100 | Verentchikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060289746 | Raznikov et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070023645 | Chernushevich | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029473 | Verentchikov | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070176090 | Verentchikov | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187614 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194223 | Sato et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080049402 | Han et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080197276 | Nishiguchi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203288 | Makarov et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080290269 | Saito et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090090861 | Willis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114808 | Bateman et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090206250 | Wollnik | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250607 | Staats et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272890 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294658 | Vestal et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314934 | Brown | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001180 | Bateman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100044558 | Sudakov | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100072363 | Giles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078551 | Loboda | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100140469 | Nishiguchi | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100193682 | Golikov et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207023 | Loboda | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100301202 | Vestal | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110133073 | Sato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168880 | Ristroph | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180702 | Flory et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180705 | Yamaguchi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186729 | Verentchikov et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120168618 | Vestal | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120261570 | Shvartsburg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120298853 | Kurulugama | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130056627 | Verenchikov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130068942 | Verenchikay | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130187044 | Ding et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130240725 | Makarov | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248702 | Makarov | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130256524 | Brown | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130313424 | Makaray et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130327935 | Wiedenbeck | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140054454 | Hoyes et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140054456 | Kinugawa et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140084156 | Ristroph et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140117226 | Gainnakopulos | May 2014 | A1 |
20140138538 | Hieftje et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140183354 | Moon et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191123 | Wildgoose et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140217275 | Ding | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246575 | Langridge et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291503 | Shchepunov et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140312221 | Verenchikov et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140361162 | Murray et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150028197 | Grinfeld et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028198 | Grinfeld et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150034814 | Brown et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048245 | Vestal et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150060656 | Ugarov | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150122986 | Haase | May 2015 | A1 |
20150194296 | Verenchikov et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150228467 | Grinfeld et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150279650 | Verenchikov | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294849 | Makarov et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318156 | Loyd et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150364309 | Welkie | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380233 | Verenchikov | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160005587 | Verenchikov | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035552 | Verenchikov | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160035558 | Verenchikov | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160079052 | Makarov | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160225598 | Ristroph | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160225602 | Ristroph et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160240363 | Verenchikov | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170025265 | Verenchikov et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032952 | Verenchikov | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170098533 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170168031 | Verenchikov | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170229297 | Green et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170338094 | Verenchikov et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180144921 | Hoyes et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180315589 | Oshiro | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180366312 | Hamish et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190180998 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190206669 | Verenchikov et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190237318 | Brown | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190360981 | Verenchikov | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200083034 | Hoyes et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200090919 | Artaev et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200126781 | Kovtoun | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200152440 | Hoyes et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200168447 | Verenchikov | May 2020 | A1 |
20200168448 | Verenchikov et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200243322 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200373142 | Verenchikov | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200373143 | Verenchikov et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200373145 | Verenchikov et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2412657 | May 2003 | CA |
101369510 | Feb 2009 | CN |
102131563 | Jul 2011 | CN |
201946564 | Aug 2011 | CN |
4310106 | Oct 1994 | DE |
10116536 | Oct 2002 | DE |
102015121830 | Jun 2017 | DE |
102019129108 | Jun 2020 | DE |
112015001542 | Jul 2020 | DE |
3237259 | Sep 1987 | EP |
1137044 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1566828 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1901332 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2068346 | Jun 2009 | EP |
1665326 | Apr 2010 | EP |
1789987 | Sep 2010 | EP |
1522087 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2599104 | Jun 2013 | EP |
1743354 | Aug 2019 | EP |
3662501 | Jun 2020 | EP |
3662502 | Jun 2020 | EP |
3662503 | Jun 2020 | EP |
2080021 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2217907 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2300296 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2390935 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2396742 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2403063 | Dec 2004 | GB |
2455977 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2476964 | Jul 2011 | GB |
2478300 | Sep 2011 | GB |
2484361 | Apr 2012 | GB |
2484429 | Apr 2012 | GB |
2485825 | May 2012 | GB |
2489094 | Sep 2012 | GB |
2490571 | Nov 2012 | GB |
2495127 | Apr 2013 | GB |
2495221 | Apr 2013 | GB |
2496991 | May 2013 | GB |
2496994 | May 2013 | GB |
2500743 | Oct 2013 | GB |
2501332 | Oct 2013 | GB |
2506362 | Apr 2014 | GB |
2528875 | Feb 2016 | GB |
2555609 | May 2018 | GB |
2556451 | May 2018 | GB |
2556830 | Jun 2018 | GB |
2562990 | Dec 2018 | GB |
2575157 | Jan 2020 | GB |
2575339 | Jan 2020 | GB |
36229049 | Feb 1987 | JP |
2000036285 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000048764 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2003031178 | Jan 2003 | JP |
3571546 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005538346 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006049273 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007227042 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2010062152 | Mar 2010 | JP |
4649234 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011119279 | Jun 2011 | JP |
4806214 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2013539590 | Oct 2013 | JP |
5555582 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2015506567 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2019030474 | Feb 2019 | NO |
2564443 | Oct 2015 | RU |
2015148627 | May 2017 | RU |
198034 | Aug 1967 | SU |
1681340 | Sep 1991 | SU |
1725289 | Apr 1992 | SU |
1998008244 | Feb 1987 | WO |
3103071 | Mar 1991 | WO |
1998001218 | Jan 1998 | WO |
200077823 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2005001878 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005043575 | May 2005 | WO |
2006049623 | May 2006 | WO |
2006102430 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006103448 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007044696 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007104992 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007136373 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008046594 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008087389 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2010008386 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010138781 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011086430 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011107836 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012010894 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012013354 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012023031 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012024468 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012024570 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012116765 | Sep 2012 | WO |
13045428 | Apr 2013 | WO |
13063587 | May 2013 | WO |
2013067366 | May 2013 | WO |
13093587 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013098612 | Jul 2013 | WO |
13110587 | Aug 2013 | WO |
13124207 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013110588 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014021960 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014074822 | May 2014 | WO |
2014110697 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014142897 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015142897 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015152968 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015153622 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015153630 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015153644 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015175988 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015189544 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016064398 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016174462 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2016178029 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2018073589 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018109920 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018124861 | Jul 2018 | WO |
2018183201 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2019030472 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019030475 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019030476 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019030477 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019058226 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019162687 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019202338 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019229599 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2020002940 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020021255 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020121167 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020121168 | Jun 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, dated Nov. 5, 2019, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2018/051206, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 pages. |
Search Report Under Section 17(5) for Application No. GB1507363.8 dated Nov. 9, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for Application No. PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Jul. 12, 2016, 16 pages. |
IPRP for application PCT/GB2016/051238 dated Oct. 31, 2017, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063076 dated Mar. 30, 2017, 9 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. 1520540.4 dated May 25, 2016. |
IPRP for application PCT/US2016/063076, dated May 29, 2018, 7 pages. |
IPRP PCT/GB17/51981 dated Jan. 8, 2019, 7 pages. |
Author unknown, “Electrostatic lens Wikipedia,” Mar. 31, 2017 (Mar. 31, 2017), XP055518392, Retrieved from the Internet:URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Electrostatic_lens oldid=773161674 [retrieved on Oct. 24, 2018]. |
Hussein, O.A. et al., “Study the most favorable shapes of electrostatic quadrupole doublet lenselenses”,AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1815, Feb. 17, 2017 (Feb. 17, 2017), p. 110003. |
Kozlov, B. et al. “Enhanced Mass Accuracy in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” www.Waters.com/Posters, ASMS Conference (2017). |
Doroshenko, V.M., and Cotter, R.J., “Ideal velocity focusing in a reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer”, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10(10):992-999 (1999). |
Guan S., et al. “Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide” Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Inc, 7(1):101-106 (1996). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052104, dated Oct. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052105, dated Oct. 15, 2018, 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052102, dated Oct. 25, 2018, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052099, dated Oct. 10, 2018, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/GB2018/052101, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 15 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807605.9 dated Oct. 29, 2018, 5 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for application GB1807626.5, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 7 pages. |
Yavor, M.I., et al., “High performance gridless ion mirrors for multi-reflection time-of-flight and electrostatic trap mass analyzers”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 426, Mar. 2018, pp. 1-11. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) for application GB1707208.3, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 5 pages. |
Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/01118, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 25 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051839 dated Sep. 18, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062203 dated Mar. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application PCT/GB2018/052100, dated Oct. 19, 2018, 19 pages. |
Wouters et al., “Optical Design of the TOFI (Time-of-Flight Isochronous) Spectrometer for Mass Measurements of Exotic Nuclei”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 240(1): 77-90, Oct. 1, 1985. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1901411.7 dated Jul. 31, 2019. |
Examination Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1618980.5 dated Jul. 25, 2019. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB 1906258.7, dated Oct. 25, 2019. |
Combined Search and Examination Report for GB1906253.8, dated Oct. 30, 2019, 5 pages. |
Author unknown, “Einzel Lens”, Wikipedia [online] Nov. 2020 [retrieved on Nov. 3, 2020]. Retrieved from Internet URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einze_lens, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051235, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 22 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2019/051416, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 22 pages. |
Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated Dec. 11, 2020, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/062174 dated Mar. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
IPRP PCT/US2016/062174 dated May 22, 2018, 6 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520130.4 dated May 25, 2016. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1520134.6 dated May 26, 2016. |
IPRP PCT/US2016/062203, dated May 22, 2018, 6 pages. |
Barry Shaulis et al: “Signal linearity of an extended range pulse counting detector: Applications to accurate and precise U-Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation quadrupole ICP-MS”, G3: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(11):1-12, Nov. 20, 2010. |
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1708430.2 dated Nov. 28, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051320 dated Aug. 1, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2019/051234 dated Jul. 29, 2019, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Patent Application No. 16866997.6, dated Oct. 16, 2019. |
Search Report under Section 17(5) for GB1916445.8, dated Jun. 15, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/GB2020/050209, dated Apr. 28, 2020, 12 pages. |
Carey, D.C., “Why a second-order magnetic optical achromat works”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 189(203):365-367 (1981) Abstract. |
Sakurai, et al., “Ion optics for time-of-flight mass spectrometers with multiple symmetry”, Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Proc 63:273-287 (1985) Abstract. |
Wollnik, H., et al., “An energy-isochronous multi-pass time-of-flight mass spectrometer consisting of two coaxial electrostatic mirrors”, Int J Mass Spectrom 227:217-222 (2003) Abstract. |
Kozlov, B. et al. “Fast Ion Mobility Spectrometry and High Resolution TOF MS” ASMS Conference Poster (2014). |
Verenchicov, A. N. “Parallel MS-MS Analysis in a Time-Flight Tandem. Problem Statement, Method, and Instrucmental Schemes” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract. |
Yavor, M. I. “Planar Multireflection Time-of-Flight Mass Analyser with Unlimited Mass Range” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract. |
Khasin, Y. I. et al. “Initial Experimenatl Studies of a Planar Multireflection Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract. |
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Stability of Ion Motion in Periodic Electrostatic Fields” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) Abstract. |
Verenchicov., A. N. “The Concept of Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer for Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract. |
Verenchicov., A. N. et al. “Accurate Mass Measurements for Inerpreting Spectra of atmospheric Pressure Ionization” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract. |
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Experimental Studies of Space Charge Effects in Multireflecting Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometes” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract. |
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Multireflecting Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer With an Ion Trap Source” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract. |
Hasin, Y. I., et al., “Planar Time-of-Flight Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer with an Orthogonal Ion Injection Out of Continuous Ion Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract. |
Lutvinsky Y. I. et al., “Estimation of Capacity of High Resolution Mass Spectra for Analysis of Complex Mixtures” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) Abstract. |
Verenchicov., A. N. et al. “Multiplexing in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 6:1-22 (2017). |
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16869126.9, dated Jun. 13, 2019. |
Supplementary Partial EP Search Report for EP Application No. 16866997.6, dated Jun. 7, 2019. |
“Reflectron—Wikipedia”, Oct. 9, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet:URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Reflectron oldid=684843442 [retrieved on May 29, 2019]. |
Scherer, S., et al., “A novel principle for an ion mirror design in time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 251, No. 1, Mar. 15, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/070508 dated Oct. 16, 2017, 17 pages. |
Search Report for United Kingdom Application No. GB1613988.3 dated Jan. 5, 2017, 4 pages. |
Sakurai et al., “A New Multi-Passage Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer at JAIST”, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section A, Elsevier, 427(1-2): 182-186, May 11, 1999. Abstract. |
Toyoda et al., “Multi-Turn-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectometers with Electrostatic Sectors”, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 38: 1125-1142, Jan. 1, 2003. |
Stresau, D., et al.: “Ion Counting Beyond 10ghz Using a New Detector and Conventional Electronics”, European Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Feb. 4-8, 2001, Lillehammer, Norway, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/21[retrieved on Jul. 31, 2019]. |
Kaufmann, R., et al., “Sequencing of peptides in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer:evaluation of postsource decay following matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI)”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. Amsterdam, NL,131:355-385, Feb. 24, 1994. |
Kozlov, B. et al. “High accuracy self-calibration method for high resolution mass spectra” ASMS Conference Abstract, 2019. |
Kozlov, B. et al. “Multiplexed Operation of an Orthogonal Multi-Reflecting TOF Instrument to Increase Duty Cycle by Two Orders” ASMS Conference, San Diego, CA, Jun. 6, 2018. |
Examination Report under Section 18(3) for Application No. GB1906258.7, dated May 5, 2021, 4 pages. |
Guan S. et al. “Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide” Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Inc, 7(1):101-106 (1996). Abstract. |
O'Halloran, G.J., et al., “Determination of Chemical Species Prevalent in a Plasma Jet”, Bendix Corp Report ASD-TDR-62-644, U.S. Air Force (1964). Abstract. |
Collision Frequency, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_frequency accessed Aug. 17, 2021. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2020/050471, dated May 13, 2020, 9 pages. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB2002768.6 dated Jul. 7, 2020. |
Search Report for GB Application No. GB 1903779.5, dated Sep. 20, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200083034 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |