Multi-step chemical mechanical polishing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6261158
  • Patent Number
    6,261,158
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 16, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 17, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A multi-step CMP system is used to polish a wafer to form metal interconnects in a dielectric layer upon which barrier and metal layers have been formed. A first polish removes an upper portion of the metal layer using a first slurry and a first set of polishing parameters, leaving residual metal within the dielectric layer to serve as the metal interconnects. A second polish of the wafer on the same platen and polishing pad removes portions of the barrier layer using a second slurry under a second set of polishing parameters. The second polish clears the barrier layer from the upper surface of the dielectric layer, thereby forming the metal interconnect. To reduce dishing and dielectric erosion, the second slurry is selected so that the barrier layer is removed at a faster rate than the residual metal within the dielectric layer. A cleaning step may be optionally performed between the first and second polishes. Further, the first polish may include a soft landing step to further reduce dishing and dielectric erosion. Alternatively, the first polish may be used to remove portions of the metal and barrier layers, leaving residual metal in the dielectric layer to serve as the metal interconnect. A second polish using a dielectric slurry is then performed to reduce microscratches.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) and, more particularly, a CMP system using two or more slurries during the CMP process.




BACKGROUND INFORMATION




CMP is often used in the fabrication of integrated circuits to planarize a surface of a wafer to facilitate subsequent photolithographic process steps or to globally remove portions of a layer formed on the wafer. In particular, CMP can be used in fabricating inter-layer interconnects (e.g., metal plugs for contacts or vias), or for forming intra-layer interconnects (e.g., copper interconnect lines in a damascene process). In addition, CMP can be used in dual damascene processes in which both inter-layer and intra-layer interconnects are formed using deposition of a single metal layer.





FIG. 1

is a diagram illustrative of a conventional CMP system


10


for polishing a wafer


11


. CMP system


10


includes a wafer carrier WC


1


to hold wafer


11


, a platen P


1


with a polishing pad


13


, and a slurry dispenser


15


with slurry S


1


. In conventional CMP system


10


, a down force is applied to wafer carrier WC


1


to achieve a polish pressure of F


D1


. To polish the surface of wafer


11


, wafer carrier WC


1


is also rotated at a rate of ω


WC1


, while platen P


1


is typically rotated in the opposite direction at a rate of ω


P1


. In this example, dispenser


15


dispenses slurry S


1


to the surface of polish pad


13


to facilitate the polishing process. In this example, slurry S


1


is a slurry designed for metal polishing. A metal slurry (i.e., a slurry for metal polishing) is typically water-based, having abrasive particles on the order of twenty to two hundred nanometers in diameter in colloidal suspension. The slurry density is about 1% to 5% by weight, with a pH typically ranging from 3 to 11.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are diagrams illustrative of a cross-section of wafer


11


(

FIG. 1

) during a conventional single-step CWP process. To facilitate understanding of this description, the same reference numbers are used in several of the drawings to indicate elements having the same or similar function or structure. Referring to

FIG. 2A

, wafer


11


(

FIG. 1

) has a semiconductor substrate


21


with built in active device such as a transistor gate, upon which a dielectric layer


23


, a barrier layer


25


and a metal layer


27


are formed. It will be appreciated that barrier layer


25


can also serve as an adhesion or glue layer for metal layers that do not readily adhere to dielectric layer


23


. For example, metal layer


27


can be a Tungsten (W) layer, with CMP system


10


(

FIG. 1

) being used to remove the top portion of metal layer


27


to form W plugs in the contact holes in dielectric layer


23


. Barrier layer


25


would typically be formed from Titanium (Ti), Titanium Nitride (TiN) or a Ti/TiN stack for barrier and adhesion purposes.

FIG. 2B

shows the resulting structure after the conventional CMP process is performed.




More specifically, referring to

FIGS. 1

,


2


A and


2


B, wafer


11


is held in wafer carrier WC


1


, with metal layer


27


facing polishing pad


13


. Dispenser


15


dispenses metal slurry S


1


onto the polishing pad


13


at a flow rate of FR


1


. Slurry S


1


is typically chosen to more selective with respect to metal layer


27


relative to barrier layer


25


and dielectric layer


21


. Platen P


1


and wafer carrier WC


1


are rotated at rates ω


P1


, and ω


WC1


, respectively. In addition, a down force F


D1


is applied to wafer carrier WC


1


to perform this conventional metal polishing process.




In this conventional process, dielectric layer


23


is used as an polish stopping layer for the CMP process. The polishing may continue for a relatively short period after the endpoint is detected to ensure that all of barrier layer


25


is cleared from the surface of dielectric layer


23


. Because of the relatively high selectivity of slurry S


1


for metal layer


27


, the removal rate of metal layer


27


is greater than the removal rates for barrier layer


25


and dielectric layer


23


. As a result, at the end of barrier layer removal, a relatively large amount of metal recess (or dishing) occurs in the contact holes, as indicated by metal layer


27


, in

FIG. 2A

being below the level of the surrounding dielectric region. The amount of metal recess is indicated in

FIG. 2B

as δ In addition, dielectric layer


23


is removed at a faster rate near the contact holes relative to the field regions. It is believed that the contact holes may cause this difference in removal rate by weakening the structural integrity of dielectric layer


23


in the region of the contact holes. This effect is referred to herein as dielectric erosion. The amount of dielectric erosion is indicated in

FIG. 2B

as a. It will be appreciated that in a typical CMP application, it is desirable to minimize both α and δ while maximizing the throughput of wafers being processed by CMP system


10


.




Another problem encountered in CMP is illustrated in FIG.


3


.

FIG. 3

shows a portion of dielectric layer


23


having microscratches


31


formed thereon, after being polished using metal slurry S


1


. Typically, a slurry that is effective in removing metal and barrier layers also causes microscratching of dielectric layers. Microscratching is generally undesirable in metal polishing because in severe cases, microscratching may result in short-circuiting of metal interconnects subsequently formed on the dielectric layer.




One conventional approach to solving the above dishing problem is illustrated in FIG.


4


.

FIG. 4

illustrates a two-platen two-slurry CMP system


40


. CMP system


40


includes CMP subsystems


41


and


42


. In this example, CMP subsystem


41


is implemented with CMP system


10


(FIG.


1


), and CMP subsystem


42


is essentially a duplicate of CMP subsystem


41


. In particular, CMP subsystem


42


includes a wafer carrier WC


2


, a platen P


2


with a polishing pad


43


, and a slurry dispenser


45


with slurry S


2


. A down force is applied to wafer carrier WC


2


to achieve a polish pressure of F


D2


. Wafer carrier WC


2


is rotated at a rate of ω


WC2


, while platen P


2


is rotated in the opposite direction at a rate of ω


P2


. Dispenser


45


dispenses slurry S


2


onto polishing pad


43


during this second polishing process. Subsystems


41


and


42


may be stations on a multi-station CMP machine, or separate CMP machines.




In this conventional approach, CMP subsystem


41


is used for metal polishing of wafer


11


using slurry S


1


, wafer carrier WC


1


and platen P


1


, as described above for CMP system


10


. Then, wafer


11


is cleaned (not shown) and transported to CMP subsystem


42


for dielectric polishing using a slurry S


2


. To reduce microscratching and/or dielectric erosion, slurry S


2


is optimized for polishing dielectric layer


23


(i.e., sometimes referred to as “second platen buffing”). To reduce dishing, the metal layer polishing is performed using barrier layer


25


(

FIG. 2A

) as the metal polish endpoint. Wafer


11


is then transported to CMP subsystem


42


for barrier layer polishing using slurry S


2


, which is optimized for barrier layer polishing. These conventional systems use two platens because slurries S


1


and S


2


are typically incompatible. For example, metal slurries typically have a low pH while dielectric slurries have a high pH. Mixing these slurries on the same platen generally causes the abrasive particles in the slurries to flocculate and fall out of suspension, which undesirably reduces uniformity of the metal removal. However, the need for transporting the wafer to a second platen undesirably reduces throughput of CMP system


40


. Therefore, there is a need for a CMP system that reduces dishing, dielectric erosion and microscratching without reducing wafer uniformity and throughput.




SUMMARY




In accordance with the present invention, a multi-step CMP system is provided that uses a single platen. This multi-step CMP system is advantageously used to form metal interconnects such as contact, vias and damascene lines. In this application, the wafer has formed upon it a dielectric layer patterned to define an interconnect within or through the dielectric layer and a blanket metal layer is deposited over the dielectric layer. Typically, a barrier layer is formed between the dielectric and metal layers.




In one aspect of the present invention, the CMP system includes a platen with a polishing pad, a wafer carrier, a dispenser, and a controller. The controller is configured to cause the CMP system to perform a first polish of the wafer. The first polish removes an upper portion of the metal layer, leaving residual metal within the dielectric layer to serve as the metal interconnects. The first polish uses a metal slurry under a first set of polishing parameters.




Then the controller causes the CMP system to perform a second polish of the wafer using a second slurry under a second set of polishing parameters. In one embodiment, the second slurry is slurry optimized for barrier layer polishing. The second polish is then performed to clear the barrier layer from the upper surface of the dielectric layer, thereby forming the metal interconnect. Because a barrier slurry is used, the barrier layer is removed at a faster rate than the residual metal within the dielectric layer, thereby reducing metal recesses and dishing compared to conventional single-step systems. In addition, because the same platen is used for both polishes, the throughput is greater than the aforementioned two-platen system.




In another aspect of the present invention, a cleaning step is used between the first and second polishes to remove most (ideally all) of the first slurry on the polishing pad. The wafer is lifted from the polishing pad and de-ionized water is used to purge the polishing pad of the first slurry. In one embodiment, a pad conditioner is used to perform the cleaning step.




In yet another aspect of the present invention, the first polish is modified to include a soft landing step using the first slurry. The bulk metal removal of the first polish is substantially similar to the first polish of the embodiments described above. However, the interfacial metal is cleared from the barrier layer using different (typically milder) polishing parameters. For example, the polishing pressure is typically reduced in the soft landing step. The soft landing step tends to reduce dishing and dielectric erosion because the milder polishing parameters tend to reduce the extent to which the polishing pad resiliently extends into the interconnect openings of the dielectric layer during the polishing process. It is believed that this “extension” of the polishing pad into the interconnect openings results in polishing of the residual metal (causing metal recesses and dishing) and removes dielectric from the area surrounding the interconnect openings (causing dielectric erosion).




In still another aspect of the present invention, the first polish is modified to remove portions of the barrier layer in addition to the upper portion of the metal layer. The first polish exposes portions of the dielectric layer, leaving residual metal and barrier within the dielectric layer to serve as the metal interconnects. A cleaning step may be optionally performed after the first polish. The then controller causes the CMP system to perform a second polish of the wafer using a second slurry under a second set of polishing parameters. In one embodiment, the second slurry is a slurry optimized for dielectric layer polishing. This second polish removes an upper portion of the dielectric layer with significantly smaller microscratches in the dielectric layer compared to polishes using metal and barrier slurries as in the conventional single-step systems. In addition, because a dielectric slurry is used, the dielectric layer tends to be removed at a faster rate than the residual metal within the dielectric layer, which may help reduce the step height between the dielectric layer in the area near the interconnect openings and the residual metal. [Further, because the same platen is used for both polishes, the throughput is greater than the aforementioned two-platen system.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings listed below.





FIG. 1

is a diagram illustrative of a conventional CMP system.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are diagrams illustrative of a cross-section of a wafer during a conventional single-step CMP process.





FIG. 3

is a diagram illustrative of a portion of a wafer having microscratches after undergoing a conventional CMP process.





FIG. 4

is a diagram illustrative of a conventional two-platen two-slurry CMP system.





FIG. 5

is a diagram illustrative of a multi-step CMP system, according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a flow diagram illustrative of the operation of the multi-step CMP system of

FIG. 5

, according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 7A-7D

are diagrams illustrative of a cross-section of a wafer during the operation of the multi-step CMP system of

FIGS. 5 and 6

, according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is a flow diagram illustrative of the operation of the multi-step CMP system of

FIG. 5

, according to another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 9A-9E

are diagrams illustrative of a cross-section of a wafer during the operation of the multi-step CMP system of

FIGS. 5 and 8

, according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 10

is a flow diagram illustrative of the operation of the multi-step CMP system of

FIG. 5

, according to still another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 11A-11D

are diagrams illustrative of a cross-section of a wafer during the operation of the multi-step CMP system of

FIGS. 5 and 10

, according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 12

is a diagram illustrative of a comparison of dishing achieved by using a multi-step CMP system according to one embodiment of the present invention and a conventional single-step CMP system.





FIG. 13

is a diagram illustrative of a comparison of dielectric erosion achieved by using a multi-step CMP system according to one embodiment of the present invention and a conventional single-step CMP system.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 5

illustrates a single-platen multi-step CMP system


50


, according to one embodiment of the present invention. CMP system


50


includes a wafer carrier


51


, a platen


52


with a polishing pad


53


, a slurry dispenser


56


, a pad-conditioning unit


57


, and a controller


59


. This embodiment is implemented with an orbital CMP machine such as, for example, an AvantGaard 676 CMP machine available from IPEC Planar, Phoenix, Ariz. To polish wafer


11


, wafer carrier


51


holds wafer


11


while a down force is applied to achieve a polish pressure of FD. In addition, wafer carrier


51


is rotated at a rate of ω


WC


while platen


52


is moved in an orbital path at a rate of ω


ORB


. Dispenser


56


dispenses slurry to the polishing surface of polishing pad


53


through platen


52


and holes (not shown) in polishing pad


53


. In this embodiment, dispenser


56


is configured to store several different slurries &id de-ionized (DI) water.




Dispenser


56


can provide slurry S


1


, slurry S


2


and DI water as desired during the CMP process. Pad-conditioning unit


57


cleans and conditions polishing pad


53


between wafer polishing operations. Controller


59


includes one or more microprocessors or microcontrollers (not shown) that are suitably programmed to control the operation of wafer carrier


51


, platen


52


, dispenser


56


, and pad-conditioning unit


57


. Controller


59


includes a memory (not shown) to store software or firmware programs that are executed to control the operation of CMP system


50


.





FIG. 6

illustrates the operation of CMP system


50


(FIG.


5


), according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 7A-7D

illustrate the resulting wafer structures at various points during the operation of CMP system


50


for this embodiment. Referring to

FIGS. 5

,


6


, and


7


A-


7


D, CMP system


50


operates as follows. Before CMP begins, semiconductor substrate


21


of wafer


11


has formed thereon dielectric layer


23


, barrier layer


25


and metal layer


27


. Dielectric layer


23


is typically an oxide layer formed by blanket deposition on substrate


21


. For example, dielectric layer


23


may be silicon dioxide formed by the decomposition of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). Dielectric layer


23


is then patterned and etched to form contact holes exposing selected areas of the substrate using photolithographic techniques that are standard in the integrated circuit fabrication industry. Barrier layer


25


is then deposited over dielectric layer


23


and in the contact holes to contact substrate


21


. The material that barrier layer


25


is composed of generally depends on the metal of metal layer


27


. For example, when metal layer


27


is made of tungsten (W), barrier layer


25


is typically formed from Ti, TiN, or a Ti/TiN stack. When metal layer


27


is formed from copper (Cu), barrier layer


25


is typically formed from Tantalum (Ta), Tantalum Nitride (TaN) or a Ta/TaN stack. The resulting structure is illustrated in FIG.


7


A.




In this embodiment, CMP system


50


is used to form contacts by removing the upper portion of metal layer


27


, leaving plugs in the holes (lined by barrier layer


25


) in dielectric layer


23


.




In a step


61


, CMP system


50


is used in a standard manner to perform CMP of metal layer


27


. More specifically, controller


59


causes dispenser


56


to dispense metal slurry S


1


to the surface of polishing pad


53


, as illustrated in FIG.


7


A. In addition, controller


59


causes wafer carrier


51


to rotate at a rate of ω


WC


and provide a polishing pressure of F


D


. Further, controller


59


also causes platen


52


to orbit at a rate of ω


ORB


.




Slurry S


1


can be any suitable metal slurry, such as Cabot 4110, available from Cabot Corporation, Boston Mass. or Baiplanar 7L or Cabot SSW-2000 for tungsten polishing, available from Baikowski International, Charlotte, N.C. Generally, slurry S


1


should be water-based at a pH of about 3 to 11, with a colloidal suspension of abrasive particles having a diameter of about 20 to 200 nanometers, and a slurry density of about 1% to 5% by weight. Preferably, slurry S


1


has a selectivity ratio of greater than ten-to-one of metal over barrier.




In this embodiment, this metal polishing process is continued until barrier layer


25


is exposed. For example, this step may be performed using barrier layer


25


as a polish stop in a suitable conventional endpoint detection scheme. Alternatively, timed techniques may be used. As a result of the removal of the upper portion of metal layer


27


, residual portions or plugs


27




2


of metal layer


27


(

FIG. 7A

) remain in the barrier-lined contact holes formed in dielectric layer


23


. Because the metal polishing is stopped when the barrier layer is detected, there is typically some metal recesses and dishing of plugs


27




2


, but the amount of metal recesses is less than in the conventional approach described above in conjunction with

FIGS. 1

,


2


A and


2


B. The resulting structure is illustrated in FIG.


7


B.




In a step


63


, controller


59


causes wafer carrier


51


to be lifted from polishing pad


52


and platen


52


. Controller


59


then causes a DI water purge of the polishing pad


53


to reduce the amount of slurry S


1


on polishing pad. In particular, controller


59


causes dispenser


56


to dispense DI water while also causing pad-conditioning unit


57


to clean polishing pad


53


. This step is optional, depending on how compatible slurry S


2


is with slurry S


1


. For example, step


63


is advantageously used when slurry S


1


is a low pH slurry and slurry S


2


is a high pH slurry. The DI water purge significantly reduces the amount of residual slurry S


1


on polishing pad


53


, thereby significantly reducing undesirable flocculation. This step is illustrated in

FIG. 7C

by an arrow


71


indicating flow of DI water onto the surface of wafer


11


. In contrast, slurry S


2


may be equivalent to a reduced concentration of slurry S


1


, or slurry S


2


may have the same pH as slurry S


1


. For example, slurry S


2


may be formulated at the same pH as the slurry S


1


but with abrasives of a smaller size and softer abrasive characteristic. In these cases, step


63


may be omitted because the similar nature of the slurries will not likely result in flocculation.




In a step


65


, controller


59


causes wafer carrier


51


to bring wafer


11


into contact with polishing pad


53


with a second polishing pressure F


D


′ while rotating at a second rate of ω


WC


′. In addition, controller


59


causes platen


52


to orbit at a second rate ω


ORB


′ and dispenser


57


to dispense slurry S


2


onto the surface of wafer


11


(as indicated by an arrow


73


in FIG.


7


C). This second polishing step is continued until the surface of dielectric layer


23


is exposed, as illustrated in FIG.


7


D. During this polishing step, plugs


27




2


(

FIG. 7C

) also get polished, thereby resulting in the removal of relatively small amounts of metal to form plugs


27




3


shown in FIG.


7


D.




In one embodiment, slurry S


2


is optimized for removal of barrier layer


25


. Preferably, slurry S


2


has a selectivity ratio of about one-to-one or less of metal over barrier. Any suitable barrier slurry may be used such as, for example, Cabot 4200 from Cabot Corporation when barrier layer


25


is formed from Ta, TaN or a Ta/TaN stack. Alternatively, slurry S


2


may be Baiplanar


41


with pH less than four by Baikowski International when barrier layer


25


is formed from Ti, TiN or a Ti/TiN stack. Yes Because the selectivity of slurry S


2


for metal over barrier is reduced in the second polishing step, the value of δ (i.e., metal recesses or dishing) is advantageously reduced. In addition, the value of α (i.e., dielectric erosion) also can be reduced when slurry S


2


is chosen to have a selectivity for barrier over dielectric that is higher than for slurry S


1


. That is, the difference in thickness of dielectric portion


23




3


and dielectric portion


23




4


is smaller than it would be if a conventional single-step process were used. In addition, because a single platen is used, the throughput of CMP system


50


is significantly higher than the aforementioned conventional two-platen systems.




Table 1 summarizes values for the polishing parameters for the various steps of this process according to one embodiment.
















TABLE 1











First Polish




Purge




Second Polish



























F


D






2-6 psi




0




2-6 psi






ω


WC






12-36 rpm




n/a




12-36 rpm






ω


ORB






200-600 rpm




N/a




200-600 rpm






FR




50-150 ml/min




100-400




50-150 ml/min








ml/min






time




to barrier endpoint




10 sec.




To dielectric endpoint






Slurry




Cabot SSW-2000




DI water




Cabot SSW-2000 (50%)














Although CMP system


50


is described in conjunction with contact fabrication, in light of the present description, those skilled in the art of integrated circuit abrication will appreciate that this embodiment of CMP system


50


can also be used to fabricate vias or to fabricate intra-layer interconnects using damascene techniques. Damascene techniques are used in some Cu interconnect fabrication technologies.





FIG. 8

illustrates the operation of CMP system


50


(FIG.


5


), according to another embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 9A-9E

illustrate the resulting wafer structures at various points during this embodiment of the operation of CMP system


50


. This embodiment is substantially the same as the embodiment described above in conjunction with

FIGS. 5

,


6


and


7


A-


7


D, except that step


61


(

FIG. 6

) is split into two steps to achieve a “soft landing.” The term soft landing is used herein to refer to changing the polishing parameters near the endpoint to reduce the removal rate(s), which tends to reduce dishing and/or dielectric erosion.




Referring to

FIGS. 5

,


8


and


9


A-


9


E, CMP system


50


operates in this embodiment as follows. In a step


81


, CMP system


50


is used in a standard manner to perform CMP of metal layer


27


. More specifically, controller


59


causes dispenser


56


to dispense metal slurry S


1


to the surface of polishing pad


53


. This is illustrated in FIG.


9


A. Slurry S


1


is a suitable metal slurry for polishing metal layer


27


. Preferably, slurry S


1


has a selectivity ratio of greater than ten-to-one of metal over barrier. In addition, controller


59


causes wafer carrier


51


to rotate at a rate of ω


WC


and provide a polishing pressure of F


D


. Further, controller


59


also causes platen


52


to orbit at a rate of ω


ORB


.




In this embodiment, this metal polishing process is stopped slightly before barrier layer


25


is exposed. For example, this step may be performed using timed polishing techniques. As illustrated in

FIG. 9B

, a relatively thin metal layer


27




4


remains above barrier layer


25


. Because the polishing is used to remove the bulk of metal layer


27


(

FIG. 9A

) without polishing barrier layer


25


, step


81


may be optimized for a high removal rate.




In a step


83


, controller


59


changes the polishing parameters to achieve a soft landing. In particular, controller


59


causes dispenser


56


to continue to dispense slurry S


1


. In addition, wafer carrier


51


need not be lifted to remove wafer


11


from polishing pad


53


. However, the polishing pressure F


D


, the slurry flow rate FR, the polishing rate ω


WC


, and the orbit rate ω


ORB


may be reduced. In this embodiment, step


83


is performed until barrier layer


25


is detected, resulting in the formation of metal plugs


27




5


in the barrier-lined contact holes formed in dielectric layer


21


as illustrated in FIG.


9


C. The soft landing tends to reduce the dishing of metal plugs


27




5


. Steps


63


and


65


are then performed as described above.




Table 2 summarizes values for the polishing parameters for the various steps of this process according to one embodiment.

















TABLE 2











First Polish




Soft Landing




Purge




Second Polish




























F


D






3-6 psi




1-3 psi




0




2-6 psi






ω


WC






18-36 rpm




12-24 rpm




n/a




18-36 rpm






ω


ORB






300-600 rpm




200-400 rpm




n/a




300-600 rpm






FR




50-150 ml/min




50-150 ml/min




100-400




50-150 ml/min









ml/min






time




Timed




Barrier endpoint




10 sec.




Dielectric










endpoint






slurry




Cabot 4110




Cabot 4110




DI water




Cabot 4200















FIG. 10

illustrates the operation of CMP system


50


(FIG.


5


), according to another embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 11A-11D

illustrate the resulting wafer structures at various points during this embodiment of the operation of CMP system


50


.




In a step


101


, CMP system


50


is used in a standard manner to perform CMP of metal layer


27


. More specifically, controller


59


causes dispenser


56


to dispense metal slurry S


1


to the surface of polishing pad


53


, as illustrated in FIG.


11


A. Preferably, slurry S


1


has a selectivity ratio of greater than ten-to-one of metal over barrier. In addition, controller


59


causes wafer carrier


51


to rotate at a rate of ω


WC


and provide a polishing pressure of F


D


. Further, controller


59


also causes platen


52


to orbit at a rate of ω


ORB


.




In this embodiment, this metal polishing process is continued until dielectric layer


23


is exposed, as illustrated in FIG.


11


B. For example, step


101


may be performed using dielectric layer


23


as a polish stop in a suitable conventional endpoint detection scheme. An overpolish may be performed to clear any residual barrier layer material from dielectric layer


23


. As a result of the removal of the upper portions of barrier layer


25


and metal layer


27


, residual portions or plugs


27


, (

FIG. 11B

) remain in the barrier-lined contact holes formed in dielectric layer


23


. Because the metal polishing is not stopped until the dielectric layer is cleared, there is typically significant dishing of plugs


27




1


. The amount of dishing is comparable to the dishing of the conventional approach described above in conjunction with

FIGS. 1

,


2


A and


2


B.




Then step


63


is performed in which wafer carrier


51


is lifted and a DI water purge is performed, as described above in conjunction with

FIG. 6. A

next step


103


is then performed. In step


103


, controller


59


causes platen


52


to orbit at a different rate ω


ORB


′″ and dispenser


57


to dispense slurry S


2


onto the surface of polishing pad


53


. In this embodiment, slurry S


2


is a dielectric slurry rather than a barrier slurry as in the previously-described embodiments. In addition, controller


59


causes wafer carrier


51


to bring wafer


11


into contact with polishing pad


53


with a different polishing pressure F


D


′″ while rotating at a different rate of ω


WC


′″. This second polishing step removes a portion of dielectric layer


23


to reduce dishing and microscratches. More specifically, dielectric layer


23


is polished so the surfaces of the resulting dielectric layer (portion


23




7


in the field region and portion


23




8


in the contact region) are about level with the surface, as illustrated in FIG.


11


D. During this polishing step, plugs


27




1


, (

FIG. 11C

) also get polished, thereby resulting in the removal of relatively small amounts of metal to form plugs


27




5


shown in FIG.


11


D.




In one embodiment, slurry S


2


is optimized for polishing of dielectric layer


23


. Preferably, slurry S


2


has a selectivity ratio of about ten-to-one or more of dielectric over metal. Any suitable dielectric slurry may be used such as, for example, Cabot type SS12 from Cabot Corporation or Klebosol 30H50 low pH SiO


2


available from Rodel. Alternatively, slurry S


2


may be Baiplanar


41


with pH less than four by Baikowski International. This type of slurry has a pH comparable to the pH of slurry S


1


, which allows step


63


to be skipped. Because the selectivity of slurry S


2


for dielectric over metal is much increased in this second polishing step, the value of δ (i.e., dishing) is advantageously reduced. In addition, microscratches are also reduced. As in the other embodiments, because a single platen is used, the throughput of CMP system


50


is significantly higher than the aforementioned conventional two-platen systems.




Table 3 summarizes values for the polishing parameters for the various steps of this process according to one embodiment.
















TABLE 3











First Polish




Purge




Second Polish



























F


D






3-6 psi




0




2-4 psi






ω


WC






12-24 rpm




N/a




12-24 rpm






ω


ORB






200-400 rpm




N/a




200-400 rpm






FR




50-150 ml/min




100-400 ml/min




50-200 ml/min






time




Dielectric endpoint




10 sec.




20-200 sec.






slurry




Baiplanar 7L




DI water




Rodel Klebosol 30H50














In an alternative embodiment, step


101


may be split into two steps using the same slurry S


1


in a soft landing approach. This approach is substantially similar to replacing step


101


with steps


81


and


83


(FIG.


8


).





FIGS. 12 and 13

respectively illustrate the amount of dishing and dielectric erosion resulting from the use of CMP system


50


(

FIG. 5

) and the soft landing technique (

FIG. 8

) in a Cu damascene application. In this example, TEOS oxide layer of about 5000 Å was deposited on several wafers, and several variously sized trenches were formed therein. A conformal TaN barrier layer and then a blanket Cu layer were then deposited on the oxide layer of each wafer. The barrier and metal layers were about 350 Å and 1.8 μm thick, respectively. In particular, this example conforms to the Sematech 926 TaN patterns for dishing and dielectric erosion for a Cu damascene process. Several of the wafers were then polished using CMP system


50


(

FIG. 5

) and the soft landing system (FIG.


6


). Cabot 4110 slurry was used in the first polish and Cabot 4200 slurry was used in the second polish under the polishing parameters summarized in Table 2 above.




For comparison, other wafers were polished using the aforementioned conventional single-step technique. An IPEC 676 polisher was used to implement CMP system


50


(FIG.


5


). As shown in

FIGS. 12 and 13

, significant improvement in dishing and dielectric erosion. For example, for 5×10 micron trenches, CMP system


50


reduced dishing to about 50 Å and dielectric erosion to about 710 Å, compared to about 958 Å and 1250 Å, respectively for the conventional single-step system. No significant differences in microscratching were observed.




In another example, W contacts were formed using CMP system


50


and the process described above in conjunction with

FIGS. 5 and 6

. In this example, a TEOS oxide layer was deposited on several wafers and 0.5 μm contact holes were formed therein. Then a barrier layer of 800 Å TiN and 200 Å Ti was deposited over the oxide layer. Finally, a metal layer of 800 Å W was deposited on the barrier layer. An IPEC 676 polisher was used to implement CMP system


50


(

FIG. 5

) and the two-step single-platen process (FIG.


6


).




Cabot SSW-2000 slurry was used in the first polish step. Without the DI water purge, a modified Cabot SSW-2000 slurry was used in the second polish step. More specifically, standard Cabot SSW-2000 was diluted to have less solid content than the standard slurry (i.e., 50% solid concentration relative to the standard concentration) under the polishing parameters summarized in Table 1 above. This embodiment achieved a reduction of about 50% in dielectric erosion compared to the conventional single-step system; e.g., about 100 Å average compared to 2000 Å average for the conventional single-step process. However, only a slight reduction in dishing was observed; e.g., about 245 Å average compared to about 250 Å average for the conventional single-step process. It is believed that dishing was not significantly reduced because the slurries in the first and second polishing steps have about the same selectivity of metal over barrier. No significant differences in microscratching were observed.




In still another example, W contacts were formed using CMw system


50


and the process described above in conjunction with

FIGS. 5 and 10

. In this example, a TEOS oxide layer was deposited on several wafers and 0.5 μm contact holes were formed therein. Then a barrier layer of 800 Å TiN and 200 Å Ti was deposited over the oxide layer. Finally, a metal layer of 800 Å W was deposited on the barrier layer. An IPEC 676 polisher was used to implement CMP system


50


(

FIG. 5

) and the two-step single-platen process (FIG.


8


).




Baiplanar 7L slurry was used in the first polish step to expose the TEOS oxide layer. The DI water purge step was performed before the second polish. In the second polish, Rodel Kiebosol 30H50 low pH SiO


2


slurry was used under the polishing parameters listed in Table 3 above. This embodiment achieved slight reductions in dishing and dielectric erosion compared to the conventional single-step system; e.g., about 2% reduction in dishing and about 10% reduction in dielectric erosion compared to the conventional single-step process. However, a 50% reduction in microscratches was observed; e.g., about 150 Å root mean square (rms) compared to about 300 Å rms for the conventional single-step process. It is believed that dishing was not significantly reduced because the polish time of the second polish step was relatively short in this example, i.e. thirty seconds.




The embodiments of the multi-step CMP system described above are illustrative of the principles of the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. For example, in light of the present disclosure, those skilled in the art can devise without undue experimentation embodiments using slurries or CMP tools other than those described. In particular, rotating CMP tools may be used rather the orbital CMP described. Further, other embodiments may employ three or more polishing steps on a single platen to achieve desired optimization of throughput, dishing and dielectric erosion. Still further, those skilled in the art can implement other embodiments for interconnects structures that do not have a barrier layer. Additionally, the terms “wafer” or “semiconductor wafer” have been used extensively herein; however, they may be more generally referred to by the term “workpiece” which is intended to include the following: semiconductor wafers, both bare or other semiconductor substrates such as those with or without active devices or circuitry, and partially processed wafers, as well as silicon on insulator, hybrid assemblies, flat panel displays, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Sensors (MEAMS), MEMS wafers, hard computer disks or other such materials that would benefit from planarization. Accordingly, while the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of performing chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) of a wafer using a CMP machine, the CMP being performed on the wafer in fabricating metal interconnects of an integrated circuit, the wafer having formed thereon a dielectric layer patterned to define an interconnect, a barrier layer formed over the dielectric layer and a metal layer formed over the barrier layer, the CMP machine having a platen with a polishing pad mounted thereon, a slurry dispenser and a wafer carrier, the method comprising:disposing the wafer in operative position to the polishing pad of the CMP machine using the wafer carrier; performing a first polish of the wafer with a first slurry using the CMP machine configured with a first set of polishing parameters, wherein the first polish exposes the barrier layer or the dielectric layer beneath the metal layer; and performing a second polish of the wafer with a second slurry using the CMP machine configured with a second set of polishing parameters, wherein the second polish is performed using the polishing pad and the platen that were used in the first polish, and wherein the second slurry is different from the first slurry.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the metal layer is formed from copper and the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer forms part of an intra-layer interconnect.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the metal layer is formed from tungsten and the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer forms part of an inter-layer interconnect.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising performing a cleaning process of the polishing pad so that the performance of the second slurry is not significantly affected during the second polish.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first polish removes portions of the metal layer to expose portions of the barrier layer and leave residual portions of the metal layer to serve as part of the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer.
  • 6. The method of claim 4 wherein the polishing pad is purged with de-ionized water during the cleaning process to remove the first slurry from the polishing pad.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the polishing pad is conditioned during the cleaning process.
  • 8. The method of claim 5 wherein the second polish is performed to remove the exposed portions of the barrier layer that do not form a part of the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer.
  • 9. The method of claim 5 wherein the second slurry is more selective for the barrier layer over the metal layer in comparison to the first slurry.
  • 10. The method of claim 5 wherein the second slurry is equivalent to the first slurry with a reduced solid concentration.
  • 11. The method of claim 5 wherein the second slurry has the same pH as the first slurry.
  • 12. The method of claim 5 wherein the first and second slurries contain abrasive particles, the abrasive particles of the second slurry having an average diameter that is smaller than that of the abrasive particles of the first slurry.
  • 13. The method of claim 5 wherein the first and second slurries contain abrasive particles, the abrasive particle of the second slurry being softer in average than that of the abrasive particles of the first slurry.
  • 14. An apparatus for performing chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) of a wafer in fabricating metal interconnects of an integrated circuit, the wafer having formed thereon a dielectric layer patterned to define an interconnect, a barrier layer formed over the dielectric layer and a metal layer formed over the barrier layer, the apparatus comprising:first polishing means for performing a first polish of the wafer with a first slurry and a first set of polishing parameters, said first polishing means using a platen and a polishing pad mounted thereon to perform the first polish, wherein the first polish exposes the barrier layer or the dielectric layer beneath the metal layer; and second polishing means for performing a second polish of the wafer with a second slurry and a second set of polishing parameters, wherein the second polish is performed using the platen and polishing pad that were used in performing the first polish, and wherein the second slurry is different from the first slurry.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the metal layer is formed from copper and the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer forms part of an intra-layer interconnect.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the metal layer is formed from tungsten and the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer forms part of an inter-layer interconnect.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 14 further comprising cleaning means for performing a cleaning process of the polishing pad so that the performance of the second slurry is not significantly affected during the second polish.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the first polishing means removes portions of the metal layer to expose portions of the barrier layer and leave residual portions of the metal layer to serve as part of the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein the cleaning means purges the polishing pad with de-ionized water to remove the first slurry from the polishing pad.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the cleaning means is configured to condition the polishing pad.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the second polishing means removes the exposed portions of the barrier layer that do not form a part of the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer.
  • 22. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the second slurry is has a selectivity for the barrier layer over the metal layer that is higher than that of the first slurry.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the second slurry is equivalent to the first slurry with a reduced solid concentration.
  • 24. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the second slurry has the same pH as the first slurry.
  • 25. The apparatus d of claim 18 wherein the first and second slurries contain abrasive particles, the abrasive particles of the second slurry having an average diameter that is smaller than that of the abrasive particles of the first slurry.
  • 26. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the first and second slurries contain abrasive particles, the abrasive particle of the second slurry being softer in average than that of the abrasive particles of the first slurry.
  • 27. A chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) machine for polishing a wafer, the wafer having formed thereon a dielectric layer patterned to define an interconnect, a barrier layer formed over the dielectric layer and a metal layer formed over the barrier layer, the CMP machine comprising:a platen having a polishing pad mounted thereon; a dispenser operatively coupled to the polishing pad, the dispenser being configured to store a plurality of slurries and selectively dispense one or more of the stored slurries to the polishing pad; a wafer carrier configured to selectively hold the wafer; and a controller coupled to the platen, dispenser and wafer carrier, the controller being configured to cause the CMP machine to perform a first polish and a second polish of the wafer, wherein: in the first polish, the controller causes the wafer carrier and platen to impart a polishing motion between the wafer and the polishing pad according to a first set of polishing parameters, and also causes the dispenser to dispense a first slurry to an interface between the wafer and the polishing pad, the first polish exposing the barrier layer or the dielectric layer beneath the metal layer; and in the second polish, the controller causes the wafer carrier to impart a polishing motion between the wafer and the polishing pad according to a second set of polishing parameters, and also causes the dispenser to dispense a second slurry to the interface between the wafer and the polishing pad, the second slurry being different from the first slurry.
  • 28. The CMP machine of claim 27 wherein the CMP machine is an orbital CMP machine.
  • 29. The CMP machine of claim 27 wherein the metal layer is formed from copper and the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer forms part of an intra-layer interconnect.
  • 30. The CMP machine of claim 27 wherein the metal layer is formed from tungsten and the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer forms part of an inter-layer interconnect.
  • 31. The CMP machine of claim 27 further comprising a pad conditioner configured to performing a cleaning process of the polishing pad to remove first slurry from the polishing pad.
  • 32. The CMP machine of claim 31 wherein controller is configured to cause the pad conditioner to purge the polishing pad with de-ionized water during the cleaning process to remove first slurry from the polishing pad.
  • 33. The CMP machine of claim 27 wherein the first polish removes portions of the metal layer to expose portions of the barrier layer and leave residual portions of the metal layer to serve as part of the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer.
  • 34. The CMP machine of claim 33 wherein the second polish removes the exposed portions of the barrier layer that do not form a part of the interconnect defined in the dielectric layer.
  • 35. The CMP machine of claim 33 wherein the second slurry is more selective for the barrier layer over the metal layer in comparison to the first slurry.
  • 36. The CAD machine of claim 33 wherein the second slurry is equivalent to the first slurry with a reduced solid concentration.
  • 37. The CMP machine of claim 33 wherein the second slurry has the same pH as the first slurry.
  • 38. The CMP machine of claim 33 wherein the first and second slurries contain abrasive particles, the abrasive particles of the second slurry having an average diameter that is smaller than that of the abrasive particles of the first slurry.
  • 39. The CMP machine of claim 33 wherein the first and second slurries contain abrasive particles, the abrasive particle of the second slurry being softer in average than that of the abrasive particles of the first slurry.
  • 40. A method of forming an interconnect on a workpiece, the workpiece having formed thereon a dielectric layer patterned to define the interconnect, a barrier layer formed over the dielectric layer and conductive layer formed over the barrier layer, the method comprising:polishing the workpiece to expose the barrier layer or the dielectric layer beneath the conductive layer using a first slurry, a first set of polishing parameters, and a polishing pad; purging the polishing pad; conditioning the polishing pad; and polishing the workpiece to have a substantially planar polished surface using a second slurry, a second set of polishing parameters and the polishing pad, wherein the first slurry is different from the second slurry.
  • 41. An apparatus for forming an interconnect on a workpiece, the workpiece having formed thereon a dielectric layer patterned to define the interconnect and a conductive layer formed over the dielectric layer, the apparatus comprising:a platen having a polishing pad mounted thereon; a dispenser operatively coupled to the polishing pad, the dispenser being configured to store a plurality of slurries and selectively dispense one or more of the stored slurries to the polishing pad; a carrier configured to selectively hold the workpiece; a conditioner selectively operatively coupled to the polishing pad; and a controller coupled to the platen, the dispenser, the conditioner and the carrier, the controller being configured to cause the apparatus to perform a first polish and a second polish of the workpiece, wherein: in the first polish, the controller causes the carrier and platen to impart a polishing motion between the workpiece and the polishing pad according to a first set of polishing parameters, and also causes the dispenser to dispense a first slurry to an interface between the workpiece and the polishing pad; the controller causes the dispenser to dispense water to the interface between the workpiece and the polishing pad after the first polish; the controller causes the conditioner to condition the polishing pad after the first polish; and in the second polish, the controller causes the carrier and platen to impart a polishing motion between the workpiece and the polishing pad according to a second set of polishing parameters, and also causes the dispenser to dispense a second slurry to the interface between the workpiece and the polishing pad, the second slurry being different from the first slurry.
  • 42. A method of performing chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) of a wafer using a CMP machine, the CMP being performed on the wafer in a fabricating metal interconnects of an integrated circuit, the wafer having formed thereon a dielectric layer patterned to define an interconnect, a barrier layer formed on the dielectric layer and a metal layer formed on the barrier layer, the CMP machine having a platen with a polishing pad mounted thereon, a slurry dispenser and a wafer carrier, the method comprising:disposing the wafer in an operative position to the polishing pad of the CMP machine using the wafer carrier; performing a first polish of the wafer with a first slurry using the CMP machine configured with a first set of polishing parameters; detecting a layer beneath the metal layer formed on the barrier layer; stopping the first polish when the layer beneath the metal layer formed on the barrier layer has been detected; and performing a second polish of the wafer with a second slurry using the CMP machine configured with a second set of polishing parameters, wherein the second polish is performed using the polishing pad and platen that were used in the first polish, and wherein the second slurry is different from the first slurry.
US Referenced Citations (20)
Number Name Date Kind
4674236 Kawakami et al. Jun 1987
4910155 Cote et al. Mar 1990
5244534 Yu et al. Sep 1993
5340370 Cadien et al. Aug 1994
5395801 Doan et al. Mar 1995
5478435 Murphy et al. Dec 1995
5516346 Cadien et al. May 1996
5522965 Chisholm et al. Jun 1996
5652177 Pan Jul 1997
5656554 Desai et al. Aug 1997
5658185 Morgan, III et al. Aug 1997
5664990 Adams et al. Sep 1997
5676587 Landers et al. Oct 1997
5709593 Guthrie et al. Jan 1998
5733177 Tsuchiya et al. Mar 1998
5763325 Kishii et al. Jun 1998
5786275 Kubo Jul 1998
5853317 Yamamoto Dec 1998
5916011 Kim et al. Jun 1999
5934980 Koos et al. Aug 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0 887 153 A2 Dec 1998 EP
WO 9728925 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9844061 Oct 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Bibby, T. et al., “Advantages of Orbital CMP Technology for Oxide and Metal Planarization,” Clarkson University, (Aug. 1997).
Dejute, Ruth, “CMP Grows in Sophistication,” Semiconductor International, (Nov. 1998).