Multiple transistor types formed in a common epitaxial layer by differential out-diffusion from a doped underlayer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8653604
  • Patent Number
    8,653,604
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 21, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 18, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Multiple transistor types are formed in a common epitaxial layer by differential out-diffusion from a doped underlayer. Differential out-diffusion affects the thickness of a FET channel, the doping concentration in the FET channel, and distance between the gate dielectric layer and the doped underlayer. Differential out-diffusion may be achieved by differentially applying a dopant migration suppressor such as carbon; differentially doping the underlayer with two or more dopants having the same conductivity type but different diffusivities; and/or differentially applying thermal energy.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to diffusion processes and dopant profiles for field effect transistors, as well as integrated circuits and processes for making same.


BACKGROUND

Modern integrated circuits typically include millions of transistors. Most commonly these transistors are field effect transistors (FETs). These transistors are typically not identical throughout an integrated circuit, but rather are divided into categories that are based on ranges of various physical, material, electrical, and quantum mechanical properties or characteristics. The aforementioned categories are referred to herein as transistor device types. Illustrative transistor device types that are commonly found in integrated circuits include, but are not necessarily limited to: p-channel FETs, n-channel FETs, FETs tailored for digital or analog circuit applications, high-voltage FETs, high/normal/low frequency FETs, FETs optimized to mimic older FET designs (i.e., legacy FETs), FETs optimized to work at distinct voltages or voltage ranges, and low/high power FETs.


The speed at which FETs switch between conducting (i.e., on) to non-conducting (i.e., off) states is typically related to the threshold voltage (Vt) associated with those FETs. For example, a transistor having a low Vt may switch faster than a transistor having a higher Vt. For speed critical applications, one might be tempted to consider using only transistors having a low Vt. However, one drawback of a low Vt transistor is undesirably high off-state leakage current. Therefore, circuit designers typically optimize an integrated circuit design for, among other things, off-state leakage current by specifying a plurality of transistor device types, each device type having a different threshold voltage. Some transistors may be specified with low Vt, other transistors may be specified with regular Vt, while still others may be specified with high Vt, with various refined Vt settings therebetween. In mobile applications as well as certain desktop applications, space constraints and other factors drive the desire to use semiconductor chips having multiple Vt integrated circuits thereon, and there remains an ongoing interest to reduce the size of the integrated circuit blocks. At the same time, power reduction and extending battery life drive the desire to use efficient semiconductor chip designs having reliable switching. A way to achieve the combined product and circuit design goals is to design semiconductor devices, e.g., transistors, having a greater uniformity of electrical characteristics. For example, a tighter distribution of variations in Vt allow for efficient circuit designs. In this way, switching reliability is achieved, which in turn reduces the need to design in compensation circuitry. The reduced need to design in circuit redundancies can reduce the size of the integrated circuit blocks.


However, fabricating multiple Vt devices in silicon using conventional CMOS processes remains an ongoing challenge. For instance, to set Vt for an individual transistor in a conventional CMOS process while also optimizing for other detrimental factors such as short-channel effects, junction capacitance, drain-induced barrier lowering effects and other issues, process engineers typically use oppositely-doped implanted regions that jut outward of the source and drain and extending inward into the channel a defined distance. Such implanted dopant regions are known as “pocket” or “halo” implants. Usually the halo implant is achieved using a multi-step, controlled implantation that involves driving ionized dopant species into the silicon lattice at high energy. To remedy damage to the lattice structure that results, as well as to activate the dopants, an anneal is typically done. While controllability of the anneal step(s) and the resultant doping profile is generally understood, the process of driving implanted material into silicon at various angles comes with inevitable variation and challenges as to process control. Also, whenever dopants are introduced directly into the transistor channel, the dopants can exhibit random fluctuation in dopant placement and concentration which can adversely affect carrier mobility and corresponding Vt. A further challenge is to carry on such Vt setting techniques as critical dimensions continue to shrink. At these smaller gate lengths, even small fluctuations in the resultant shape of the halo implants affects the final Vt that is set for the transistor. It is therefore difficult to reliably set Vt across a plurality of transistors. A further complication occurs when such processes are applied for multiple transistor device types, each having different Vts. There then results not only the variation from transistor-to-transistor for the same type of transistors, but further variation across different transistor device types. Because of such limitations in the semiconductor process, circuit designers develop techniques and redundancies to compensate for the Vt variation which typically results in a larger cell footprint. Such compensatory designs are not straightforward, and serve to add to the cost of producing an integrated circuit, particularly at the more advanced semiconductor processes.


What is needed are integrated circuits having multiple sets of transistor structures, each set with its own range of physical, material, electrical, and quantum mechanical properties or characteristics, and methods of integrating the manufacture thereof to result in a reduction in the variation of threshold voltage.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional representation of a partially fabricated transistor structure having a screening layer and a blanket epitaxial layer vertically adjacent thereto.



FIG. 2A is a cross-sectional representation of a portion of a wafer with a doping profile prior to forming transistor structures therein.



FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional representation of two partially fabricated DDC transistor device types, formed in part by out-diffusion from a screen layer, including a high Vt transistor and a low Vt transistor.



FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate two partially fabricated device types formed in part by out-diffusion from a screen layer, including a DDC transistor with threshold voltage set layer and a slightly depleted channel (SDC) transistor.



FIG. 4 illustrates four representative and distinct transistor device types that can be supported on the wafer and die.



FIG. 5 is an illustration of selected process steps in the formation of a blanket epitaxial channel transistor.



FIG. 6 illustrates possible metal work function selection in conjunction with epitaxial channel dopant modifications.



FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional representation of a partially fabricated integrated circuit including both legacy and DDC transistors.



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional representation of a partially fabricated integrated circuit including SDC and DDC transistors.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following Detailed Description refers to accompanying drawings to illustrate exemplary embodiments consistent with the invention. References in the Detailed Description to “one exemplary embodiment,” “an illustrative embodiment,” “an exemplary embodiment,” and so on, indicate that the exemplary embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every exemplary or illustrative embodiment may not necessarily include that particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same exemplary embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is within the knowledge of those skilled in the relevant art(s) to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.


The exemplary embodiments described herein are provided for illustrative purposes, and are not limiting. Other embodiments are possible, and modifications may be made to the exemplary embodiments within the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the Detailed Description is not meant to limit the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined only in accordance with the subjoined claims and their equivalents.


The following Detailed Description of the exemplary embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments that others can, by applying knowledge of those skilled in relevant art(s), readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such exemplary embodiments, without undue experimentation. Therefore, such adaptations and modifications are intended to be within the meaning and plurality of equivalents of the exemplary embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation, such that the terminology or phraseology of the present specification is to be interpreted by those skilled in relevant art(s) in light of the teachings herein.


Epitaxial layer refers to a layer of single crystal semiconductor material. In this field, an epitaxial layer is commonly referred to “epi.”


FET, as used herein, refers to field effect transistor. An n-channel FET is referred to herein as an N-FET. A p-channel FET is referred to herein as a P-FET. Unless noted otherwise the FETs referred to herein are MOSFETs.


As used herein, “gate” refers to the gate terminal of a FET. The gate terminal of a FET is also referred to in this field as a “gate electrode.” Historically, the gate electrode was a single structure such as a layer of doped polysilicon disposed on a gate dielectric. More recent developments of the gate have included varying the materials incorporated therein, including the use of metals and metal alloys.


Source/drain (S/D) terminals refer to the terminals of a FET, between which conduction occurs under the influence of an electric field, subsequent to the inversion of the semiconductor surface under the influence of an electric field resulting from a voltage applied to the gate terminal of the FET. Generally, the source and drain terminals of a FET are fabricated such that they are geometrically symmetrical. With geometrically symmetrical source and drain terminals it is common to simply refer to these terminals as source/drain terminals, and this nomenclature is used herein. Designers often designate a particular source/drain terminal to be a “source” or a “drain” on the basis of the voltage to be applied to that terminal when the FET is operated in a circuit.


Substrate, as used herein, refers to the physical object that is the basic workpiece that is transformed by various process operations into the desired microelectronic configuration. Silicon wafers are a commonly used substrate in the manufacture of integrated circuits.


The term vertical, as used herein, means substantially perpendicular to the surface of a substrate.


The expressions “analog device”, “analog transistor”, “analog FET” and similar phrases or expressions refer to transistors that have electrical characteristics suited for use in analog circuit applications. By way of example and not limitation, FETs used in analog circuit applications are often biased so as to operate in the unsaturated mode, and tend to have higher Vt settings than FETs used in digital or logic circuit applications. When analog and digital circuits exist on the same die, it is not uncommon that the gate length of FETs used in the analog circuitry is greater than the minimum gate length achievable in a given process technology.


The expressions “digital device”, digital transistor”, digital FET”, “logic device”, logic transistor”, “logic FET” and similar phrases or expressions refer to transistors that have electrical characteristics suited for use in digital circuit applications. By way of example and not limitation, FETs used in digital, or logic, circuit applications are typically driven to be in their fully on state or fully off state. Such FETs tend to have lower Vt settings than FETs used in analog applications. When analog and digital circuits exist on the same die, it is not uncommon that the gate length of FETs used in the digital circuitry is the minimum gate length achievable in a given process technology.


Multiple transistor types are formed in a substantially undoped layer by differential out-diffusion from a doped underlayer. The substantially undoped layer is preferably epitaxially formed silicon or silicon-germanium, which may be formed as a blanket common layer across the different devices, or may be formed selectively. Differential out-diffusion from transistor-to-transistor affects the thickness of the substantially undoped layer and therefore effects a resulting threshold voltage for the transistor.


As noted above, many integrated circuit designs benefit from the availability of a variety, or range, of transistor device types that can be included in those integrated circuits. The availability of multiple transistor device types provides engineers with the resources to produce optimized circuit designs, as well as to produce circuit designs that might otherwise be unachievable if limited to a small number of transistor device types. As a practical matter, it is desirable that each integrated circuit on a wafer be able to incorporate all, or any subset of, the range of transistor device types available in an integrated circuit manufacturing process while achieving a limited variation in threshold voltage both locally and globally.


Disclosed herein are exemplary semiconductor structures, along with methods for making such structures, wherein a plurality of transistor device types are provided within an integrated circuit, and/or within a wafer containing a plurality of integrated circuits.


In an illustrative embodiment, there is provided a wafer in which a plurality of wells have been formed, typically by ion implantation. On at least some of the wells, there is also a heavily doped screen layer having a predetermined thickness and dopant concentration, typically formed by ion implantation. Such a screen layer is located in the uppermost portion of the well, i.e., that portion of the well closest to the surface of the wafer. The screen layer is preferably highly uniform in so as to define a reliable depletion width in the channel when a voltage is applied to the gate. As desired, to target a particular substantially undoped layer thickness, dopant migration inhibitors are used. For instance, carbon may be emplaced together with boron-doped screens. Another example is to use a material that tends to stay in place with proper thermal conditions, such as antimony. Dopants for the screen layer are selected for the desired diffusivity properties and are of opposite conductivity type from the dopants that form the source/drain. N-type dopants are selected for P-FET screen layer, and P-type dopants are selected for N-FET screen layer. It is also noted that combinations of dopant materials can be used. For at least FETs used in digital circuits, electrically active dopants forming the screen can be of the same dopant species, even if multiple dopant-introducing steps are used, though different dopant species of the same conductivity type may be used in combination, as desired to achieve the selected electrical properties to set Vt with controllable out-diffusion. A blanket epitaxial layer of a pre-selected thickness is then formed on the wafer over the screen layer, thereby extending across multiple die and transistor die blocks. The blanket epitaxial layer is preferably formed using a highly uniform process, with within-wafer and wafer-to-wafer uniformity of less than 5% thickness variation. It is further noted that, to achieve alternative devices, the epitaxial layer may be implanted or grown using in-situ doping to result in various starting-point channel dopant profiles.


In general, using a series of masking steps, selected screen layers are formed for different devices. It is noted that screen layers, though described herein as typically being doped by ion implantation, may also be formed using processes including, but not limited to, in-situ doped epitaxial growth, and diffusion.


Some devices may be specified to be formed conventionally so as to result in a “legacy” device. As used herein, legacy device refers to a transistor having a channel with the Vt set using dopants introduced directly into the channel (such as by halo doping, shallow channel implant or like process). Legacy devices may skip having a screen layer altogether, as a screen layer is not necessary. During the remainder of wafer processing, which includes subsequent feature formations such as the gate, source and drain, contacts and so on, a thermal processing cycle which can include rapid thermal processing, solid phase epitaxy or other thermal process and combinations thereof, is performed using a pre-selected recipe that results in dopant profiles by way of individual degrees of out-diffusion of the screen layer tailored to each device threshold voltage setting target. Transistors are isolated using a shallow trench isolation (STI) process. Preferably the STI process is carried out after the blanket-epitaxial layer is formed, though variants of the embodiments include processes having STI performed before selective epi. It is noted that selective epi refers to the process whereby, instead of a blanket common epitaxial layer formed across the wafer, a selective process is used (which includes a masking step) to result in one or more individual epi regions across a die, and/or across a wafer. Such epi regions, formed by the selective epi process described herein, may have different physical and/or electrical properties. By way of example, and not limitation, the different epi regions may have different thicknesses, different doping concentrations, different doping profiles, different dopant species or combinations of dopant species, and/or be composed of different materials. The different epi regions having the different physical and/or electrical characteristics, enable the formation of a plurality of transistor device types.


After wafer processing and singulation, a plurality of die having at least some with a screen layer and a substantially undoped layer are formed.


Transistors with different Vt, mobility, transconductance, or other electrical characteristics can be created using the embodiments disclosed. Various doping profiles to result in Vt targets in accordance with the present disclosure include undoped channels, deep or shallow screens, and Vt set layers. Additionally, channel materials may be selected as the need arises, for instance, SiGe as opposed to an intrinsic silicon layer.



FIG. 1 illustrates features of a structure 100 capable of being efficiently transformed into various transistor device types through a combination of process operations. As noted above, transistor device types include, but are not limited to: P-FETs, N-FETs, FETs tailored for digital or analog circuit applications, high-voltage FETs, high/normal/low frequency FETs, FETs optimized to mimic older FET designs (i.e., legacy FETs), FETs optimized to work at distinct voltages or voltage ranges, and low/high power FETs, high, low, or regular threshold voltage transistors (i.e., high Vt, low Vt, or regular Vt), and so on. Transistor device types can be distinguished by electrical characteristics (e.g., threshold voltage, mobility, transconductance, linearity, noise, power), or by suitability for a particular application (e.g., signal processing or data storage). Since an integrated circuit such as a system on a chip (SoC), or other complex integrated circuit may require many different transistor device types to achieve the desired circuit performance, structures that can be readily modified to form various transistor device types by way of a manufacturing process having design flexibility is desirable.


Exemplary structure 100 illustrates a partially fabricated FET in accordance with the present disclosure. It will be understood that structure 100 represents a plurality of device types, and further variants not pictured can be used. It is further understood that, though not shown, the embodiments described herein are intended for use to fabricate a plurality of device types, which may be variants around structure 100, or may include combinations of devices generally represented by structure 100 with legacy devices (not shown). It will be appreciated that structure 100, at the stage of fabrication shown in FIG. 1, does not yet include S/D terminals, and so is not yet a transistor.


Structure 100 includes a gate electrode 102. Gate electrode 102 is typically formed of an electrically conductive material such as doped polysilicon, or a metal or metal stack. If metal or metal stack, gate electrode 102 may be formed using either a “gate first” process or a “gate last” process. An epitaxial layer 120 (indicated by bracket) that can support multiple degrees of doping including remaining intrinsic, is grown on a screen layer 108. A separate Vt set layer 106 is depicted, which Vt set layer may be formed by a distinct doping step from the doping for screen layer 108, or may be a result of a controlled out-diffusion from screen layer 108. Screen layer 108, which has a dopant concentration greater than that of any doped layers in epitaxially grown layer 120 is defined above an optional anti-punchthrough (APT) layer 110 or well/deep well layer 112. It is noted that some devices may be designed to be legacy devices, therefore if desired to achieve targeted electrical characteristics of legacy transistors, screen layer 108 and Vt set layer 106 may be omitted. All layers are supported on a bulk silicon wafer substrate 114. In this illustrative embodiment, relative dopant concentration between layers is indicated by adjacent graph 130, which shows the successively decreasing dopant concentration above and below screen layer 108. It is noted that not every transistor structure in an integrated circuit in accordance with the present disclosure is required to have the same relative doping profile as that shown in the FIG. 1. In this illustrative embodiment, epitaxial layer 120 is grown as an undoped layer of silicon. In alternative embodiments, epitaxial layer 120 may include a stoichiometric ratio of another semiconductive material such as germanium. In another alternative embodiment, epitaxial layer 120 may be grown in a manner that incorporates electrically active dopants therein during the epitaxial growth process in predetermined areas in which transistors having certain electrical characteristics are to be formed.


The threshold voltage of a FET formed from structure 100 can be determined, at least in part, by the thickness of epitaxial layer 120, and further determined by dopant concentration and thickness of screen layer 108 as well as Vt set layer 106. The thickness of epitaxial layer 120 is controlled by the extent of controlled diffusion of one or more dopant layers upward into epitaxial layer 120, so that there results a channel layer 104. Other process and/or structural considerations with respect to determining the magnitude of the threshold voltage include, but are not limited to, the presence or absence of lightly doped drains extending into the channel (i.e., subjacent a portion of gate electrode 102), and the material(s) used to form a metal gate electrode.


Implanted dopants can include P-type or N-type dopants in varying concentrations and with varying silicon diffusivity. Materials typically used are boron, indium, thallium, arsenic, phosphorous and antimony for electrically active species, and carbon and germanium and combinations thereof, for diffusion inhibitors. The materials are selected based upon desired electrical and diffusivity characteristics within the constraints of the thermal budget for the fabrication process. Ion implantation operations may use atoms and/or techniques selected to modify the silicon structure from crystalline to amorphous to inhibit diffusion, followed by a controlled anneal to repair damage and activate the dopant species. In some embodiments, carbon is used to suppress the out-diffusion of dopants from screen layer 108 and/or Vt set layer 106.


In some embodiments, epitaxial layer 120 is formed with a nominally constant thickness and extends across an area in which multiple transistor device types are subsequently formed. In other embodiments, epitaxial layer 120 is formed with a nominally constant thickness and extends across an area in which multiple blocks of differing transistor device types are subsequently formed. In still other embodiments, epitaxial layer 120 is formed with a nominally constant thickness and extends across an entire die. In still other embodiments, epitaxial layer 120 is formed with a nominally constant thickness and extends across the entire wafer.


A desirable level of consistency with respect to epitaxial layer thickness, i.e., process uniformity, is preferably obtained. In embodiments where epitaxial layer thickness as grown does not meet the desired uniformity, then planarization techniques involving polishing or etching may be applied to achieve the desired uniform epitaxial layer thickness. Selective epitaxial growth may also be used to result in individualized epitaxial layer thickness from transistor region to transistor region, from cell to cell, from block to block, or die to die.


With a substantially constant epitaxial layer thickness, the distance between gate electrode 102 and screen layer 108 can be varied by controlled out-diffusion. Legacy transistors can be fabricated by implanting channel layer 104, either non-specifically in terms of dopant profile, or by way of halo dopant implants. Such legacy transistors can be formed in conjunction with transistors having a substantially undoped channel 104.


A DDC transistor can be formed from the foregoing described process operations and structures of FIG. 1. A DDC transistor includes a gate electrode, a gate dielectric layer, a first source/drain terminal, and a second source/drain terminal. A structural portion of the DDC transistor, referred to herein as the channel, is bounded on three sides respectively by the first source/drain terminal, the second source/drain terminal, and the gate dielectric layer. In operation, the channel of the DDC transistor is deeply depleted, forming what can be described as a deeply depleted channel, with the depletion region depth bounded by a highly doped screen layer.


As noted, for a DDC transistor, while channel 104 remains substantially undoped, epitaxial layer 120 may include simple or complex layering with different dopant concentrations. This doped layering can optionally include a threshold voltage set layer 106 that has a dopant concentration less than that of screening layer 108. In various embodiments threshold voltage setting layer 106 is disposed vertically adjacent to screen layer 108. Threshold voltage set layer 106 is used to make small adjustments in the operational threshold voltage of the DDC transistor and can be formed by out-diffusion from screen layer 108, in-situ or delta doping during epitaxial growth, or with tightly controlled implants. The portion of the channel adjacent to the gate should remain substantially or completely undoped. Embodiments of various DDC transistor structures and manufacturing processes are more completely described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/708,497 titled Electronic Devices and Systems, and Methods for Making and Using the Same, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/971,884 titled Low Power Semiconductor Transistor Structure and Method of Fabrication Thereof, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/971,955 titled Transistor with Threshold Voltage Set Notch and Method of Fabrication Thereof, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/895,785 titled “Advanced Transistors With Threshold Voltage Set Dopant Structures”, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.


In some embodiments, screening layer 108 is doped to have a concentration between about 5×1018 dopant atoms per cm3 and about 1×1020 dopant atoms per cm3, significantly more than the dopant concentration of the undoped channel, and at least slightly greater than the dopant concentration of the optional voltage threshold set layer 106. It is noted that exact dopant concentrations and screening layer thicknesses can be modified, from those set forth in the illustrative embodiments disclosed herein, to improve desired operating characteristics, or to take into account available transistor manufacturing processes and process conditions. To help control leakage, an anti-punchthrough layer 110 can optionally be formed beneath screening layer 108. Typically, anti-punchthrough layer 110 is formed by direct implant into a lightly doped well 112, but it can alternatively be formed by out-diffusion from screening layer 108, in-situ growth, or other known process. Anti-punchthrough layer 110 has a dopant concentration less than that of screening layer 108, typically set between about 1×1018 dopant atoms per cm3 and about 1×1019 dopant atoms per cm3. In addition, the doping concentration of anti-punchthrough layer 110 is set higher than the overall doping concentration of well 112. It is noted that exact dopant concentrations and depths can be modified, from those set forth in the illustrative embodiments disclosed herein, to improve desired operating characteristics of the transistor, or to take into account available transistor manufacturing processes and process conditions.


As disclosed, threshold voltage set layer 106 is positioned vertically adjacent screening layer 108, and is typically formed as a thin doped layer. In some embodiments, delta doping, controlled in-situ deposition, or atomic layer deposition can be used to form a dopant plane that is substantially parallel and vertically offset with respect to screening layer 108. Alternatively, threshold voltage set layer 106 can be accomplished by way of a controlled diffusion of screen layer dopant material upward a distance into channel layer 104 to a preselected depth below gate electrode 102. Suitably varying dopant concentration, thickness, and separation from the gate dielectric and screening layer 108 allows for controlled slight adjustments of threshold voltage in the operating transistor. In some embodiments, threshold voltage set layer 106 is doped to have a concentration between about 1×1018 dopant atoms per cm3 and about 1×1019 dopant atoms per cm3. Threshold voltage set layer 106 can be formed by several different processes, including 1) in-situ epitaxial doping, 2) epitaxial growth of a thin layer of silicon followed by a tightly controlled dopant implant (e.g., delta doping), 3) epitaxial growth of a thin layer of silicon followed by dopant diffusion of atoms from screen layer 108, 4) ion implantation into screen layer 108, preferably using a different dopant material from the dopant forming the screen layer 5) controlled out-diffusion from screen layer 108 or by any combination of these processes.


As used herein, “channel” refers to a region that extends between the source and the drain, and supports movement of mobile charge carriers between the source and the drain. Channel thickness typically ranges from 5 to 50 nanometers, with thickness in a particular instance being dependent on the desired transistor electrical characteristics and technology node (i.e., a 20 nm gate length transistor will typically have a thinner channel than a 45 nm gate length transistor). In some embodiments, dopant migration resistant layers of carbon, germanium, or the like can be applied along with or above screen layer 108 to further limit dopant migration.


In still another embodiment, a slightly depleted channel (SDC) transistor can also be formed using screen layer 108 and epitaxial layer 120 of the partially fabricated semiconductor structure 100FIG. 1. The SDC transistor may use screen layer 108 doped to have the same or similar dopant concentration as that of the DDC transistor, so that screen layer 108 remains effective to define the depletion width for the transistor when a voltage is applied to gate 102. However, an SDC transistor is distinct from a DDC transistor in that implants, in-situ epitaxial growth, screen layer out-diffusion, or other dopant positioning methods are used to spread dopants into the epitaxial layer, including the channel. The concentration and uniformity of dopants can vary, but will be intermediate between DDC transistors that normally are substantially undoped, and highly doped conventional or legacy transistors. Because of the channel dopants, such transistors can be better matched to legacy transistor device types than undoped channel DDC transistors. Advantageously, such SDC circuits can reduce redesign requirements, can match channel functionality of legacy circuits more closely, and may not need auxiliary bias. In addition, short channel effects are reduced, allowing an increase in lightly doped drain dose that provides higher drive current than comparable DDC transistors. It is noted that Vt variations and mobility in the channel for an SDC transistor are improved relative to a conventional FET, but an SDC transistor will not generally have as high mobility or as reliable a Vt set as a DDC transistor.


A legacy transistor, in accordance with the present disclosure, is a field effect transistor having conventional electrical performance characteristics that is constructed by applying dopants into the channel so as to set the threshold voltage and determine transistor characteristics such as short channel effects. More specifically, threshold voltage implants, channel dopant implants, and halo implants can all be used to modify channel characteristics to achieve legacy transistor-like characteristics. In some embodiments, screen layer implants can be reduced or minimized, subjected to counter-doping, or otherwise altered to allow closer matching to conventional transistor structures. Alternatively, screen layer implants may be omitted altogether. In other embodiments, the screen layer can be heavily doped, and subsequent out-diffusion into the channel produces a doping profile needed to establish the electrical characteristics associated with desired legacy transistors. While such transistors have inferior mobility, increased noise and increased variation of threshold voltage as compared DDC or SDC transistors, integrated circuits including legacy transistors can be useful for avoiding or minimizing the extent of circuit block redesigns.



FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate selected structures and processing steps in the manufacture of an integrated circuit 200 having the structural foundation to form at least two distinct transistor device types 210 and 220 separated by an isolation structure 208, and having separate Vt settings achieved by varied screen layer thickness and depth.


Referring to FIG. 2A, the structural foundations of the transistor device types 210 and 220 are constructed on a common substrate 216 that is singly or multiply implanted with dopants, providing an initial dopant profile 202.


Dopant profile 202 roughly defines layers that will result post-processing in at least three distinct layers, including a screen layer 204, an anti-punchthrough layer 205, and a well 207, all supported on substrate 216. The dopant concentration typically peaks at the bottom, middle or top portion of screen layer 204. As will be appreciated, one or more dopants having different diffusivity characteristics can be co-implanted. For those devices where dopants from screen layer 204 should not be allowed to migrate upward, a capping layer made of carbon or other diffusion inhibiting material can be incorporated in the top portion of screen layer 204.


Referring to FIG. 2B, a common epitaxial layer 206 is grown on substrate 216. Epitaxial layer 206 is typically intrinsic silicon, but all or portions thereof may be silicon germanium, or another material suitable for forming the channel of a FET. Portions of epitaxial layer 206 that respectively form devices types 210 and 220 can be differentially treated with constant or graded profile carbon or other diffusion inhibiting or for that matter, promoting implants. The devices are then subjected to one or more thermal cycles (including optional rapid thermal processing) specially designed to achieve preselected migration levels of the dopants for the various devices to result in channel doping characteristics specific to the devices. Because of the differential carbon concentrations for selected devices, upward diffusion of dopants from screen layer 204 and ultimate thickness of the screen layer and resulting channel layer 214/224 are different for the different devices.


Alternatively the wafer can be masked to protect that portion of the substrate that will form device 210, and additional dopant species can be implanted in the portion of the substrate that forms device 220. If the newly implanted dopant species has an increased diffusivity as compared to the blanket implanted dopant species, the faster moving dopant will migrate further than dopants in the earlier masked region. Effective diffusivity differentials result in different dopant profiles and are illustrated as profiles 212 and 222, with screen layer 204 slightly increasing in thickness (as indicated respectively by the length differential between arrows 204A and 204B) for device 210 and greatly increasing in thickness for device 220 (as indicated respectively by the length differential between arrows 204C and 204D). It is noted that after formation of gate and S/D terminals to complete the transistor structures (not shown), and under the same operating conditions there will be device groupings having distinct threshold voltages, e.g., high Vt, regular Vt and low Vt. This is because of the differing distances of the screen layer from the gate, even while otherwise sharing the same epitaxially grown channel, thermal processing/anneal conditions and having similar gate lengths. Those devices that are formed to result in DDC or SDC transistors will have noticeably better threshold voltage variation compared to the legacy transistor devices. Thus, a common process platform supports the incorporation of a wide variety of transistor device types, and is well-suited for use in the manufacture of integrated circuits such as, but not limited to, SoCs.



FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate selected structures and processing steps in the manufacture of an SoC 300 with at least two distinct device types 310 and 320 separated by isolation structure 308, and having separate Vt settings due to a modified screen layer depth, again achieved by way of preselected diffusion level upward toward the gate into a commonly grown epitaxial layer 306. As seen in FIG. 3A, the devices are constructed on a common substrate 316 that is singly or multiply implanted with dopants, providing an initial dopant profile 302. The dopant profile roughly defines regions that will result post-processing in at least three distinct layers, including a screen layer 304, an anti-punchthrough layer 305, and a well 307. The dopant concentration peaks at or near the surface of substrate 316 in screen layer 304 (with screen thickness 304A). It is noted that dopants having differing diffusivity characteristics can be co-implanted. As seen in FIG. 3B, a common blanket layer 306 is epitaxially grown on screen layer 304. Epitaxial layer 306 is typically intrinsic silicon, but all or a portion thereof can be silicon germanium, or other channel material. Portions of epitaxial layer 306 that respectively form device types 310 and 320 can be differentially treated with constant or graded profile carbon or other diffusion inhibiting or promoting implants. For device 310, because of the differential carbon concentration, upward diffusion of dopants from screen layer 304, and the ultimate thickness of the screen layer and channel layer 314 for a device can include multiple layers and dopant concentrations, with an intermediate threshold set layer 309 having an intermediate dopant concentration between channel layer 314 and screen layer 304 (with screen layer 304 shown here as somewhat expanded into epitaxial layer 306 by out-diffusion during thermal cycling to have thickness 304B). The wafer can be masked to protect that portion of the substrate that will form device 320, and additional dopant species can be implanted in the portion of the substrate that forms device 310. If the newly implanted dopant species in a given area has an increased diffusivity as compared to the previously implanted dopant species, the faster moving dopant will migrate further than dopants in the earlier masked region and form threshold set layer 309. For instance, if an Sb implant is made in one area, followed by an As implant thereon, the As implant will tend to be a faster moving species and therefore is situated to form the Vt region over the otherwise Sb doped screen layer. Direct or halo implants 321 can in addition be used to dope the channel of device 320, as desired, after temporarily masking device 310. In effect, the differences between effective diffusivity and implant conditions can result in different dopant profiles and are respectively illustrated as profile 302 and 322. Screen layer 304 is only moderately increased in thickness for device 310, with an intermediate threshold voltage set layer 309. Whereas, screen layer 304 greatly increases in thickness for device 320 to essentially eliminate the previously undoped channel, in effect forming a transistor having operation properties similar to a traditional channel doped legacy transistor. After formation of gate and source/drain structures to form the transistor devices (not shown), under the same operating conditions device will also have a significantly different higher threshold voltage (high Vt) as compared to the other device (regular Vt) because of the differing screen and channel dopant conditions, even while otherwise sharing the same thermal processing/anneal conditions and having similar dimensions.



FIG. 4 illustrates a semiconductor wafer 442 supporting multiple die such as previously described. In accordance with the present disclosure each die can support multiple blocks of circuitry, each block having one or more transistor device types. Such an arrangement enables the creation of complex system on a chip (SoC) integrated circuits or similar die that optionally include FETs tailored for analog, digital, or legacy circuit applications, along with improved transistors such as the DDC and SDC transistors described herein. For example, four useful blocks in a single die are illustrated as follows: block 444 outlines a collection of deeply depleted channel (DDC) transistors; block 445 outlines slightly depleted channel (SDC) transistors; block 446 outlines conventional channel doped legacy transistors; and block 447 outlines transistors tailored for analog circuit applications which may be formed using a DDC scheme, an SDC scheme or may be legacy. As will be appreciated, these transistor types are representative and not intended to limit the transistor device types that can be usefully formed on a die or wafer. Wafer 400 includes a substrate 402 (typically silicon), that can be implanted with optional anti-punchthrough and required screening layer 404, and an epitaxial blanket layer 406 grown after implantation of dopants in layer 404.


One embodiment of a portion of a transistor manufacturing process 500 is illustrated by FIG. 5. A wafer is masked 502 with a “zero layer” alignment mask to define dopant implantable well regions. A deep N-well can be optionally formed 504 in combination with a conventional N-well. A highly doped screen layer and/or Vt set implant 506 using a different dopant species with increased or decreased silicon diffusivity can also optionally be formed. After masking the N-well, the P-well is implanted 508. Other well implants such as an anti-punchthrough implant can also be formed in the respective P and N-wells, before or after screen layer implantation. When the well doping is complete, an optional carbon or other migration inhibitor is then doped onto the wells. Next, a silicon epitaxial layer is grown 512 across the entire substrate to a preselected thickness and uniformity and provides a sufficient maximum silicon channel thickness for selected devices to be DDC devices. Typically the layer is silicon, but silicon germanium or other non-silicon in-situ deposited atoms can also be added to the epitaxial layer either across the substrate or at preselected device locations using masks. Preferably in a sequence that follows epitaxial growth, shallow trench isolation (STI) structures made by etching trenches and depositing the same with electrically insulative material are formed to separate wells 514. Temperature cycling is then performed to cause the screen layer dopants to migrate selected distances upward into the silicon channel, the distance upward determined by the temperature, time and extent of migration stop dopant materials contained in the devices. Gate structures, spacers, contacts, stress implants, tensile films, dielectric coatings, and the like are then formed, and additional channel doping can optionally be done using halo implants and/or traditional channel implants 516. Additional well-known steps may be performed to complete various transistor structures such as, but not limited to, S/D terminal formation, S/D terminal contact formation, silicidation, gate contact formation, and so on 518. Other advantages and possible process variations are discussed in particular in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/708,497; 12/971,884 and 12/971,955, all of which were previously incorporated by reference.


As will be appreciated, forming transistor isolation structures after some or all of well dopant implants are made and the blanket epitaxial layer is formed is an effective technique for reducing unwanted dopant scattering and for more precisely controlling screen layer depth across the wafer (and die or die blocks). In contrast to conventional “isolation first” processes, where isolation structures are defined, followed by masking and well implant, an “isolation last” process such as previously described effectively eliminates or reduces well implant scattering from isolation structures. At least some of the well and/screen layer implants are made, and then trench etch and insulating layer growth can be done to electrically isolate the respective wells as required. Such isolation last structures and processes are more completely described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/708,497; 12/971,884 and 12/971,955, all of which were previously incorporated by reference.


To better understand design selection parameters, required transistor structures, and suitable processes the following Tables and Examples are provided:


In the following Table 1, a range of suitable materials, operating parameters, and the like are described for commonly required transistor device types that can constructed according the present disclosure. In the Table 1, C1, C2, and C3 respectively refer to ranges of layer concentrations for the channel, voltage threshold set layer, and screen layer as shown in FIG. 1; t1, t2, and t3 respectively refer to thickness of the channel, voltage threshold set layer, and screen layer.













TABLE 1






Low Vt
Regular Vt
High Vt
SRAM







Vt range
[0.2 V-0.4 V]
[0.3-0.5 V]
[0.4-0.6 V]
[0.4-0.6 V]


Target doping
t1 [10-15 nm]
t1 [5-10 nm]
t1 [0-5 nm]
t1 [10-15 nm]


profile
t2 [0-5 nm]
t2 [5-10 nm]
t2 [10-15 nm]
t2 [0-5 nm]



C1 [0-1e17]
C1 [0-1e17]
C1 [0-1e17]
C1 [0-1e17]



C2 [1e17-1e18]
C2 [1e17-1e18]
C2 [1e17-1e18]
C2 [1e17-1e18]



C3 [1e18-1e19]
C3 [1e18-1e19]
C3 [1e18-1e19]
C3 [1e18-1e19]


Gate Stack
N-FET: N
N-FET: N
N-FET: N
P-FET/N-FET



P-FET: P
P-FET: P
P-FET: P
metal swap


Carbon in
Energy [1-5 keV]
Energy [1-5 keV]
Preferably no C
Energy [1-5 keV]


screen
Dose [3e14-2e15]
Dose [0-3e14]

Dose [3e14-2e15]


(nMOS)






Screen dopant
N-FET: B, BF2, In
N-FET: B, BF2
N-FET: B, BF2
N-FET: B, BF2, In


species
P-FET: Sb
P-FET: Sb or As
P-FET: As
P-FET: Sb


Epitaxy
Undoped or
Undoped
Undoped
Undoped, or



C-doped


C-doped


Additional
Preferably 0
Dose: [5e12-2e13]
Dose: [1e13-4e13]
Preferably 0


Halo






implantation






Channel
Si, or SiGe channel
Si, or SiGe channel
Si, or SiGe channel
Si


material
for P-FET
for P-FET
for P-FET









As seen in FIG. 6, gate work function selection can also be used in conjunction with varying channel/screen/threshold voltage set layer dopant concentration to further adjust the threshold voltage of FETs. TiN has a mid-gap work function of approximately 4.6 eV and can be used as the metal for a gate electrode. The TiN work function can be adjusted as desired by selective nitridization or other process that modifies the relative concentration of the two materials or the thickness of the TiN, thereby allowing for still another set point against which the FETs can be targeted for screening layer concentrations and thickness, as well as channel thickness. In FIG. 6, a PFET can require a certain metal selection, determined by matching the desired Vt to a desired work function. This same metal can be used in at least some other transistor device types by varying channel thickness, material, changing concentration and thickness of screen and/or threshold voltage layers, providing a design selection spread that can encompass, for example, a high Vt and a regular Vt FET. The same mask/metal can be used for two or more transistor device types, thus simplifying, and reducing the time required for, manufacturing an integrated circuit.


Example 1
Legacy Logic and Well Matched DDC SRAM in Cells

In accordance with the present disclosure, and as seen in FIG. 7, it is possible for a single die to incorporate multiple legacy style doped channel transistor device types, as well as undoped channel DDC transistors or SDC transistors or combinations thereof. SRAM bit cells do not tolerate large variations in random dopant fluctuation, and require relatively tight matching of threshold voltage. In FIG. 7, the epitaxial layer in the SRAM section supports a Vt set layer and undoped channel in a DDC configuration, while for other transistors, the same epitaxial layer is doped to legacy transistor specification levels with halo implants and channel Vt implants. The P-FET metal gate may be reused for DDC transistors because Vt setting is reliably achieved therein. More particularly, the legacy P-FET and the SRAM DDC P-FET each use the same gate metal, but may have different channel materials, i.e., SiGe and Si respectively. This provides a work function difference that in turn produces different threshold voltages for the two transistor device types. Thus, a common process platform supports the incorporation of a wide variety of transistor device types, and is well-suited for use in the manufacture of integrated circuits such as, but not limited to, SoCs.


Example 2
Integrated Circuit with SDC and Well Matched DDC SRAM Cells

In accordance with the present disclosure, and as seen in FIG. 8, a single die can support SDC doped channel FETs, as well as undoped channel DDC FETs. SRAM bit cell circuits do not tolerate FETs with large variations in random dopant fluctuation, and require relatively tight matching of threshold voltage. In FIG. 8, the epitaxial layer in the SRAM section supports a Vt set layer and undoped channel, while the same epitaxial layer is doped to varying levels by out-diffusion from a screen layer, with optional halo implants and channel Vt implants to better approximate legacy transistor characteristics in other circuits. Another embodiment is to fabricate the one device type in the SRAM cell as DDC, either the P-FET or the N-FET, with the other device remaining legacy within the SRAM itself. Thus, a common process platform supports the incorporation of a wide variety of transistor device types, and is well-suited for use in the manufacture of integrated circuits such as, but not limited to, SoCs.


Example 3
Integrated Circuit with DDC SRAM Transistors in the Bit Cell

In accordance with the present disclosure, for an integrated circuit such as an SoC SRAM DDC transistors in the bit cell are provided. The screening layer is implanted before shallow trench isolation structures are formed, and before a substantially undoped epitaxial silicon layer is grown on a surface of the screen layer. To create a high threshold voltage DDC FET, a starting-point high dose screening layer is formed. Depending on the thermal cycle, the dopant diffusivity, and optional implanted diffusion mitigation implants such as carbon, the channel under the gate remains substantially undoped. In some embodiments, a separate Vt set layer below an undoped channel may be provided or formed. For the remaining transistors that are not SRAM, legacy transistors are formed preferably using a scheme as describe above.


Example 4
Integrated Circuit with DDC Transistors in an SRAM and Logic Circuits, with Legacy Style FETs in Analog Circuits

In a process in accordance with the present disclosure, a wafer including a plurality of die is manufactured so that dopants are implanted before shallow trench isolation. In such a process, a heavily doped screen layer is implanted before shallow trench isolation structures are formed, and before a low or undoped epitaxial silicon layer is grown on a surface of the screen layer. An out-diffusion step moves dopants from the screen layer into the epitaxial layer. These out-diffused dopants can provide the majority of a threshold voltage setting dose for FETs that will be formed in that region of the epitaxial layer. In this example, transistors used in the SRAM bit cells and logic circuits are intended to have different electrical characteristics than the transistors used in circuits that were designed to work with transistors having legacy characteristics. Thus these two types of transistors will be formed in a common epitaxial layer and may both have dopants out-diffused from the screen layer, but will have different electrical characteristics once fully fabricated. More particularly, some or all of the legacy FETs formed on the same epitaxial layer are separately doped with halo implants into the epitaxial layer to create transistors compatible with legacy operation.


In some embodiments, the SRAM bit cell includes two cross-coupled CMOS inverters wherein the N-FETs and P-FETs of the two inverters have the same gate length and gate width. The majority of threshold voltage setting dose is out-diffused from the screen layer into epitaxial layer and acts to set the threshold voltage of one of the two device types, for instance, P-FET only with N-FETs being DDC transistors.


Transistor device types in accordance with teachings of the present disclosure can be formed on a die, alone or in combination with other transistor types, and have a reduced mismatch arising from scattered or random dopant variations as compared to conventional FETs. This is particularly important for transistor circuits that rely on closely matched transistors for optimal operation, including differential matching circuits, analog amplifying circuits, and many digital circuits in widespread use such SRAM cells. Variation can be even further reduced by adoption of structures such as a screen layer, an undoped channel, or a Vt set layer as described herein to further effectively increase the headroom which the FETs have to operate. These electrical characteristics allow, among other things, high-bandwidth electronic circuits having improved sensitivity and performance.


In one illustrative embodiment, in accordance with the present disclosure, a method of forming a plurality of transistor device types on an integrated circuit, includes doping selected portions of a wafer to form a first plurality of wells of a first conductivity type; doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form a screen layer of the first conductivity type, the screen layer being disposed closer to a surface of the wafer than the wells; growing an epitaxial layer over the surface of the wafer; differentially out-diffusing dopants from the screen layer into the epitaxial layer; and subsequent to formation of the epitaxial layer, forming shallow trench isolation structures. Some embodiments further include doping one or more regions of the screen layer with a diffusion affecting species.


In another illustrative embodiment, in accordance with the present disclosure, a method of making a System on Chip integrated circuit, includes forming a plurality of transistor device types on a die; and interconnecting predetermined ones of the plurality of transistor device types to form a plurality of circuit blocks; wherein forming the plurality of transistor device types includes forming transistor channel regions having different electrical characteristics by differentially out-diffusing dopants into a common epitaxial layer from an underlying screen layer, the screen layer having a plurality of compositionally different regions. Interconnection of transistors on integrated circuits by way of various contacts, vias, and electrically conductive interconnect lines is well known in this field and is not further described herein.


In another illustrative embodiment, in accordance with the present disclosure, an integrated circuit, includes a plurality of n-channel field effect transistors (NFETs) and a plurality of p-channel field effect transistors (PFETs) all disposed in a commonly formed epitaxial layer; a screen layer underlying the epitaxial layer, the screen layer having a plurality of regions with different doping profiles; a first portion of the plurality of NFETs having a first set of electrical characteristics and a second portion of the plurality of NFETs having a second set of electrical characteristics that are different from the first set of electrical characteristics; and a first portion of the plurality of PFETs having a third set of electrical characteristics and a second portion of the plurality of PFETs having a fourth set of electrical characteristics that are different from the third set of electrical characteristics; wherein the difference between the first and second sets of electrical characteristics are related to the different doping profiles of the respective underlying regions of the screen layer, and the difference between the third and fourth sets of electrical characteristics are related to the different doping profiles of the respective underlying regions of the screen layer.


CONCLUSION

It is to be appreciated that the Detailed Description section, and not the Abstract of the Disclosure, is intended to be used to interpret the claims. The Abstract of the Disclosure may set forth one or more, but not all, exemplary embodiments of the invention, and thus, is not intended to limit the invention and the subjoined Claims in any way.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s) that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus the invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the subjoined Claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An integrated circuit die supporting a plurality of transistor device types formed by a process comprising the steps of: doping selected portions of a wafer to form a first plurality of wells of a first conductivity type;doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form a first plurality of screen layers of the first conductivity type, the screen layers being disposed closer to a surface of the wafer than the wells, the screen layers being formed using one or more screen layer doses;growing a substantially undoped epitaxial layer over the screen layer to a defined thickness and uniformity;forming source and drain structures for the plurality of transistor device types within the undoped epitaxial layer;doping selected portions of the first plurality of screen layers to introduce diffusion-inhibiting dopant species;outdiffusing dopants from the screen layer into the epitaxial layer using a thermal cycling process, wherein the threshold voltages of each transistor device type of the plurality of transistor device types are differentiated by distance of dopant migration towards the gate; andperforming halo implants into predetermined portions of the epitaxial layer in alignment with at least one selected source and drain structure, one or more halo implant doses being used to perform the halo implants;wherein the screen layer has a doping concentration that is greater than a doping concentration of the first plurality of wells;wherein at least some of the transistor devices of the plurality of transistor device types are formed using a discrete and individualized predetermined combination of the one or more screen layer dose and the one or more halo implant dose.
  • 2. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, further including forming a first plurality of anti-punchthrough regions in said first plurality of wells of a first conductivity type.
  • 3. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, wherein doping selected portions of the first plurality of screen layers comprises implanting one or more elements that act as a dopant migration barrier.
  • 4. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, wherein the diffusion-inhibiting dopant species comprise carbon.
  • 5. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, wherein doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form the first plurality of screen layers comprises implanting at least a first dopant species having a first diffusivity in a first portion of the first plurality of screen layers, and implanting a second dopant species having a second diffusivity in a second portion of the first plurality of screen layers, the first diffusivity being greater than the second diffusivity.
  • 6. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, wherein one or more of the transistor device types are formed using a halo implant dose approximately in the range of 5×1012 atoms/cm2 to 2×1013 atoms/cm2.
  • 7. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, wherein one or more of the transistor device types are formed using a halo implant dose approximately in the range of 1×1013 atoms/cm2 to 4×1013 atoms/cm2.
  • 8. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, wherein the halo implant step is not performed for one or more of the transistor device types.
  • 9. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, the process further comprising the steps of: forming an anti-punchthrough layer between at least one of the first plurality of wells and at least one of the screen layers that overlies the at least one of the first plurality of wells,wherein the anti-punchthrough layer has a doping concentration greater than a doping concentration of the at least one well, and less that a doping concentration of the overlying screen layer.
  • 10. The integrated circuit die of claim 2, wherein differentially out-diffusing dopants forms at least a first channel region having a first thickness and a second channel region having a second thickness that is different from the first thickness.
  • 11. The integrated circuit die of claim 10, wherein the first thickness is less than the second thickness, and the screen layer underlying the first channel region has a greater concentration of dopants of relatively high diffusivity than the screen layer underlying the second channel region.
  • 12. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, the process further comprising the step of forming a threshold voltage setting layer above the screen layer and below the surface of the epitaxial layer.
  • 13. The integrated circuit die of claim 1, the process further comprising the step of: forming shallow trench isolation structures to isolate at least some of the plurality of doped wells from each other,wherein the shallow trench isolation structures are formed after forming the substantially undoped semiconductive layer.
  • 14. The integrated circuit die of claim 13, wherein the shallow trench isolation structures are formed before performing the halo implants.
  • 15. An integrated circuit die supporting a plurality of transistor device types formed by a process comprising the steps of: doping selected portions of a wafer to form a first plurality of wells of a first conductivity type;doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form a first plurality of screen layers of the first conductivity type, the screen layers being disposed closer to a surface of the wafer than the wells, the screen layers being formed using one or more screen layer doses;growing a substantially undoped epitaxial layer over the screen layer to a predetermined thickness and uniformity;forming source and drain structures for the plurality of transistor device types within the undoped epitaxial layer; andperforming halo implants into predetermined portions of the epitaxial layer in alignment with the source and drain structures of at least one first transistor device type of the plurality of transistor device types, one or more halo implant doses being used to perform the halo implants,wherein at least one second transistor device type of the plurality of transistor device type is formed without halo implants, and wherein the second transistor device type has less variation of threshold voltage as compared to the first transistor device type.
  • 16. The integrated circuit die of claim 15, wherein the screen layer dose used to form the first transistor device type is different from the screen layer dose used to form the second transistor device type.
  • 17. The integrated circuit die of claim 15, wherein the screen layer dose used to form the first transistor device type is substantially equal to the screen layer dose used to form the second transistor device type.
  • 18. A method of forming a plurality of transistor device types on an integrated circuit, the transistors having a gate disposed over a semiconductive channel, comprising: doping selected portions of a wafer to form a first plurality of wells of a first conductivity type;doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form a first plurality of screen layers of the first conductivity type, the screen layers being disposed closer to a surface of the wafer than the wells;doping selected portions of the first plurality of screen layers to introduce diffusion-inhibiting dopant species;growing a substantially undoped epitaxial layer over the first plurality of screen layers to a defined thickness and uniformity;out-diffusing dopants from at least one of the first plurality of screen layers into the epitaxial layer to result in discrete threshold voltage devices by way of a thermal cycling process to result in defined degrees of out-diffusion of dopants that are differentiated by distance of dopant migration toward the gate;wherein doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form the first plurality of screen layers comprises implanting at least a first dopant species having a first diffusivity in a first portion of the first plurality of screen layers, and implanting a second dopant species having a second diffusivity in a second portion of the first plurality screen layers, and the first diffusivity is greater than the second diffusivity.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the screen layer has a doping concentration that is greater than a doping concentration of the first plurality of wells.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, wherein doping selected portions of the first plurality of screen layers comprises implanting one or more elements that act as a dopant migration barrier.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein at least one of the one or more elements that act as a dopant migration barrier comprises carbon.
  • 22. An integrated circuit die supporting a plurality of transistor device types formed by a process comprising the steps of: doping selected portions of a wafer to form a first plurality of wells of a first conductivity type;doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form a first plurality of screen layers of the first conductivity type, the screen layers being disposed closer to a surface of the wafer than the wells, the screen layers being formed using one or more screen layer doses;growing a substantially undoped epitaxial layer over the screen layer to a defined thickness and uniformity;forming source and drain structures for the plurality of transistor device types within the undoped epitaxial layer; andperforming halo implants into predetermined portions of the epitaxial layer in alignment with at least one selected source and drain structure, one or more halo implant doses being used to perform the halo implants;wherein at least some of the transistor devices of the plurality of transistor device types are formed using a discrete and individualized predetermined combination of the one or more screen layer dose and the one or more halo implant dose;wherein doping selected portions of the first plurality of wells to form the first plurality of screen layers comprises implanting at least a first dopant species having a first diffusivity in a first portion of the first plurality of screen layers, and implanting a second dopant species having a second diffusivity in a second portion of the first plurality of screen layers, the first diffusivity being greater than the second diffusivity.
  • 23. The integrated circuit die of claim 22, the process further comprising the steps of: forming an anti-punchthrough layer between at least one of the first plurality of wells and at least one of the screen layers that overlies the at least one of the first plurality of wells,wherein the anti-punchthrough layer has a doping concentration greater than a doping concentration of the at least one well, and less that a doping concentration of the overlying screen layer.
  • 24. The integrated circuit die of claim 22, the process further comprising the step of forming a threshold voltage setting layer above the screen layer and below the surface of the epitaxial layer.
US Referenced Citations (512)
Number Name Date Kind
3958266 Athanas May 1976 A
4000504 Berger Dec 1976 A
4021835 Etoh et al. May 1977 A
4242691 Kotani et al. Dec 1980 A
4276095 Beilstein, Jr. et al. Jun 1981 A
4315781 Henderson Feb 1982 A
4518926 Swanson May 1985 A
4559091 Allen et al. Dec 1985 A
4578128 Mundt et al. Mar 1986 A
4617066 Vasudev Oct 1986 A
4662061 Malhi May 1987 A
4761384 Neppl et al. Aug 1988 A
4780748 Cunningham et al. Oct 1988 A
4819043 Yazawa et al. Apr 1989 A
4885477 Bird et al. Dec 1989 A
4908681 Nishida et al. Mar 1990 A
4945254 Robbins Jul 1990 A
4956311 Liou et al. Sep 1990 A
5034337 Mosher et al. Jul 1991 A
5091324 Hsu et al. Feb 1992 A
5144378 Hikosaka Sep 1992 A
5156989 Williams et al. Oct 1992 A
5156990 Mitchell Oct 1992 A
5166765 Lee et al. Nov 1992 A
5208473 Komori et al. May 1993 A
5294821 Iwamatsu Mar 1994 A
5298763 Shen et al. Mar 1994 A
5369288 Usuki Nov 1994 A
5373186 Schubert et al. Dec 1994 A
5384476 Nishizawa et al. Jan 1995 A
5426328 Yilmaz et al. Jun 1995 A
5444008 Han et al. Aug 1995 A
5552332 Tseng et al. Sep 1996 A
5559368 Hu et al. Sep 1996 A
5608253 Liu et al. Mar 1997 A
5622880 Burr et al. Apr 1997 A
5624863 Helm et al. Apr 1997 A
5625568 Edwards et al. Apr 1997 A
5641980 Yamaguchi et al. Jun 1997 A
5663583 Matloubian et al. Sep 1997 A
5712501 Davies et al. Jan 1998 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5726488 Watanabe et al. Mar 1998 A
5726562 Mizuno Mar 1998 A
5731626 Eaglesham et al. Mar 1998 A
5736419 Naem Apr 1998 A
5753555 Hada May 1998 A
5754826 Gamal et al. May 1998 A
5756365 Kakumu May 1998 A
5763921 Okumura et al. Jun 1998 A
5780899 Hu et al. Jul 1998 A
5847419 Imai et al. Dec 1998 A
5856003 Chiu Jan 1999 A
5861334 Rho Jan 1999 A
5877049 Liu et al. Mar 1999 A
5885876 Dennen Mar 1999 A
5889315 Farrenkopf et al. Mar 1999 A
5895954 Yasumura et al. Apr 1999 A
5899714 Farrenkopf et al. May 1999 A
5918129 Fulford, Jr. et al. Jun 1999 A
5923067 Voldman Jul 1999 A
5923987 Burr Jul 1999 A
5936868 Hall Aug 1999 A
5946214 Heavlin et al. Aug 1999 A
5985705 Seliskar Nov 1999 A
5989963 Luning et al. Nov 1999 A
6001695 Wu Dec 1999 A
6020227 Bulucea Feb 2000 A
6030862 Kepler Feb 2000 A
6043139 Eaglesham et al. Mar 2000 A
6060345 Hause et al. May 2000 A
6060364 Maszara et al. May 2000 A
6066533 Yu May 2000 A
6072217 Burr Jun 2000 A
6078082 Bulucea Jun 2000 A
6087210 Sohn Jul 2000 A
6087691 Hamamoto Jul 2000 A
6088518 Hsu Jul 2000 A
6091286 Blauschild Jul 2000 A
6096611 Wu Aug 2000 A
6103562 Son et al. Aug 2000 A
6121153 Kikkawa Sep 2000 A
6147383 Kuroda Nov 2000 A
6153920 Gossmann et al. Nov 2000 A
6157073 Lehongres Dec 2000 A
6175582 Naito et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184112 Maszara et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190979 Radens et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194259 Nayak et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198157 Ishida et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218892 Soumyanath et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218895 De et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221724 Yu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229188 Aoki et al. May 2001 B1
6232164 Tsai et al. May 2001 B1
6235597 Miles May 2001 B1
6238982 Krivokapic et al. May 2001 B1
6245618 An et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255174 Yu Jul 2001 B1
6268640 Park et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271070 Kotani et al. Aug 2001 B2
6271551 Schmitz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288429 Iwata et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297082 Lin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6297132 Zhang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300177 Sundaresan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313489 Letavic et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319799 Ouyang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320222 Forbes et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323525 Noguchi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326666 Bernstein et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335233 Cho et al. Jan 2002 B1
6358806 Puchner Mar 2002 B1
6380019 Yu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6391752 Colinge et al. May 2002 B1
6426260 Hshieh Jul 2002 B1
6426279 Huster et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432754 Assaderaghi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444550 Hao et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444551 Ku et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449749 Stine Sep 2002 B1
6455903 Yu Sep 2002 B1
6461920 Shirahata Oct 2002 B1
6461928 Rodder Oct 2002 B2
6472278 Marshall et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482714 Hieda et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489224 Burr Dec 2002 B1
6492232 Tang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500739 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503801 Rouse et al. Jan 2003 B1
6503805 Wang et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506640 Ishida et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518623 Oda et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521470 Lin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6534373 Yu Mar 2003 B1
6541328 Whang et al. Apr 2003 B2
6541829 Nishinohara et al. Apr 2003 B2
6548842 Bulucea et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551885 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6552377 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6573129 Hoke et al. Jun 2003 B2
6576535 Drobny et al. Jun 2003 B2
6600200 Lustig et al. Jul 2003 B1
6620671 Wang et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624488 Kim Sep 2003 B1
6627473 Oikawa et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630385 Yu Oct 2003 B1
6630710 Augusto Oct 2003 B1
6660605 Liu Dec 2003 B1
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667200 Sohn et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670260 Yu et al. Dec 2003 B1
6693333 Yu Feb 2004 B1
6730568 Sohn May 2004 B2
6737724 Hieda et al. May 2004 B2
6743291 Ang et al. Jun 2004 B2
6743684 Liu Jun 2004 B2
6751519 Satya et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753230 Sohn et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760900 Rategh et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770944 Nishinohara et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787424 Yu Sep 2004 B1
6797553 Adkisson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6797602 Kluth et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797994 Hoke et al. Sep 2004 B1
6808004 Kamm et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808994 Wang Oct 2004 B1
6813750 Usami et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821825 Todd et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821852 Rhodes Nov 2004 B2
6822297 Nandakumar et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831292 Currie et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835639 Rotondaro et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852602 Kanzawa et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852603 Chakravarthi et al. Feb 2005 B2
6881641 Wieczorek et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881987 Sohn Apr 2005 B2
6891439 Jachne et al. May 2005 B2
6893947 Martinez et al. May 2005 B2
6900519 Cantell et al. May 2005 B2
6901564 Stine et al. May 2005 B2
6916698 Mocuta et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917237 Tschanz et al. Jul 2005 B1
6927463 Iwata et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928128 Sidiropoulos Aug 2005 B1
6930007 Bu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930360 Yamauchi et al. Aug 2005 B2
6957163 Ando Oct 2005 B2
6963090 Passlack et al. Nov 2005 B2
6995397 Yamashita et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002214 Boyd et al. Feb 2006 B1
7008836 Algotsson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013359 Li Mar 2006 B1
7015546 Herr et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015741 Tschanz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036098 Eleyan et al. Apr 2006 B2
7038258 Liu et al. May 2006 B2
7039881 Regan May 2006 B2
7045456 Murto et al. May 2006 B2
7057216 Ouyang et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061058 Chakravarthi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064039 Liu Jun 2006 B2
7064399 Babcock et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071103 Chan et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078325 Curello et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078776 Nishinohara et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089513 Bard et al. Aug 2006 B2
7089515 Hanafi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091093 Noda et al. Aug 2006 B1
7105399 Dakshina-Murthy et al. Sep 2006 B1
7109099 Tan et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119381 Passlack Oct 2006 B2
7122411 Mouli Oct 2006 B2
7127687 Signore Oct 2006 B1
7132323 Haensch et al. Nov 2006 B2
7169675 Tan et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170120 Datta et al. Jan 2007 B2
7176137 Perng et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186598 Yamauchi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7189627 Wu et al. Mar 2007 B2
7199430 Babcock et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208354 Bauer Apr 2007 B2
7211871 Cho May 2007 B2
7221021 Wu et al. May 2007 B2
7223646 Miyashita et al. May 2007 B2
7226833 White et al. Jun 2007 B2
7226843 Weber et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230680 Fujisawa et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235822 Li Jun 2007 B2
7256639 Koniaris et al. Aug 2007 B1
7259428 Inaba Aug 2007 B2
7260562 Czajkowski et al. Aug 2007 B2
7294877 Rueckes et al. Nov 2007 B2
7297994 Wieczorek et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301208 Handa et al. Nov 2007 B2
7304350 Misaki Dec 2007 B2
7307471 Gammie et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312500 Miyashita et al. Dec 2007 B2
7323754 Ema et al. Jan 2008 B2
7332439 Lindert et al. Feb 2008 B2
7348629 Chu et al. Mar 2008 B2
7354833 Liaw Apr 2008 B2
7361562 Kim Apr 2008 B2
7380225 Joshi et al. May 2008 B2
7398497 Sato et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402207 Besser et al. Jul 2008 B1
7402872 Murthy et al. Jul 2008 B2
7416605 Zollner et al. Aug 2008 B2
7427788 Li et al. Sep 2008 B2
7442971 Wirbeleit et al. Oct 2008 B2
7449733 Inaba et al. Nov 2008 B2
7462908 Bol et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469164 Du-Nour Dec 2008 B2
7470593 Rouh et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485536 Jin et al. Feb 2009 B2
7487474 Ciplickas et al. Feb 2009 B2
7491988 Tolchinsky et al. Feb 2009 B2
7494861 Chu et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496862 Chang et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496867 Turner et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498637 Yamaoka et al. Mar 2009 B2
7501324 Babcock et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503020 Allen et al. Mar 2009 B2
7507999 Kusumoto et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514766 Yoshida Apr 2009 B2
7521323 Surdeanu et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531393 Doyle et al. May 2009 B2
7531836 Liu et al. May 2009 B2
7538364 Twynam May 2009 B2
7538412 Schulze et al. May 2009 B2
7562233 Sheng et al. Jul 2009 B1
7564105 Chi et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566600 Mouli Jul 2009 B2
7569456 Ko et al. Aug 2009 B2
7586322 Xu et al. Sep 2009 B1
7592241 Takao Sep 2009 B2
7595243 Bulucea et al. Sep 2009 B1
7598142 Ranade et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605041 Ema et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605060 Meunier-Beillard et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605429 Bernstein et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608496 Chu Oct 2009 B2
7615802 Elpelt et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622341 Chudzik et al. Nov 2009 B2
7638380 Pearce Dec 2009 B2
7642140 Bae et al. Jan 2010 B2
7644377 Saxe et al. Jan 2010 B1
7645665 Kubo et al. Jan 2010 B2
7651920 Siprak Jan 2010 B2
7655523 Babcock et al. Feb 2010 B2
7673273 Madurawe et al. Mar 2010 B2
7675126 Cho Mar 2010 B2
7675317 Perisetty Mar 2010 B2
7678638 Chu et al. Mar 2010 B2
7681628 Joshi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682887 Dokumaci et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683442 Burr et al. Mar 2010 B1
7696000 Liu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704822 Jeong Apr 2010 B2
7704844 Zhu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709828 Braithwaite et al. May 2010 B2
7723750 Zhu et al. May 2010 B2
7732286 Hanafi et al. Jun 2010 B2
7737472 Kondo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7741138 Cho Jun 2010 B2
7741200 Cho et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745270 Shah et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750374 Capasso et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750381 Hokazono et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750405 Nowak Jul 2010 B2
7750682 Bernstein et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755144 Li et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755146 Helm et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759206 Luo et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759714 Itoh et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761820 Berger et al. Jul 2010 B2
7795677 Bangsaruntip et al. Sep 2010 B2
7808045 Kawahara et al. Oct 2010 B2
7808410 Kim et al. Oct 2010 B2
7811873 Mochizuki Oct 2010 B2
7811881 Cheng et al. Oct 2010 B2
7818702 Mandelman et al. Oct 2010 B2
7821066 Lebby et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829402 Matocha et al. Nov 2010 B2
7829957 Kato et al. Nov 2010 B2
7831873 Trimberger et al. Nov 2010 B1
7846822 Seebauer et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855118 Hoentschel et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859013 Chen et al. Dec 2010 B2
7863163 Bauer Jan 2011 B2
7867835 Lee et al. Jan 2011 B2
7883977 Babcock et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888205 Herner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888747 Hokazono Feb 2011 B2
7895546 Lahner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7897495 Ye et al. Mar 2011 B2
7906413 Cardone et al. Mar 2011 B2
7906813 Kato Mar 2011 B2
7910419 Fenouillet-Beranger et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919791 Flynn et al. Apr 2011 B2
7926018 Moroz et al. Apr 2011 B2
7935984 Nakano May 2011 B2
7939898 Smayling et al. May 2011 B2
7941776 Majumder et al. May 2011 B2
7943468 Curello et al. May 2011 B2
7945800 Gomm et al. May 2011 B2
7948008 Liu et al. May 2011 B2
7952147 Ueno et al. May 2011 B2
7960232 King et al. Jun 2011 B2
7960238 Kohli et al. Jun 2011 B2
7968400 Cai Jun 2011 B2
7968411 Williford Jun 2011 B2
7968440 Seebauer Jun 2011 B2
7968459 Bedell et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989900 Haensch et al. Aug 2011 B2
7994573 Pan Aug 2011 B2
8004024 Furukawa et al. Aug 2011 B2
8008158 Chang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012827 Yu et al. Sep 2011 B2
8029620 Kim et al. Oct 2011 B2
8039332 Bernard et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046598 Lee Oct 2011 B2
8048791 Hargrove et al. Nov 2011 B2
8048810 Tsai et al. Nov 2011 B2
8051340 Cranford, Jr. et al. Nov 2011 B2
8053321 Helm et al. Nov 2011 B2
8053340 Colombeau et al. Nov 2011 B2
8063466 Kurita Nov 2011 B2
8067279 Sadra et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067280 Wang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067302 Li Nov 2011 B2
8076719 Zeng et al. Dec 2011 B2
8097529 Krull et al. Jan 2012 B2
8103983 Agarwal et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105891 Yeh et al. Jan 2012 B2
8106424 Schruefer Jan 2012 B2
8106481 Rao Jan 2012 B2
8110487 Griebenow et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114761 Mandrekar et al. Feb 2012 B2
8119482 Bhalla et al. Feb 2012 B2
8120069 Hynecek Feb 2012 B2
8129246 Babcock et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129797 Chen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134159 Hokazono Mar 2012 B2
8143120 Kerr et al. Mar 2012 B2
8143124 Challa et al. Mar 2012 B2
8143678 Kim et al. Mar 2012 B2
8148774 Mori et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163619 Yang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8169002 Chang et al. May 2012 B2
8170857 Joshi et al. May 2012 B2
8173499 Chung et al. May 2012 B2
8173502 Yan et al. May 2012 B2
8176461 Trimberger May 2012 B1
8178430 Kim et al. May 2012 B2
8179530 Levy et al. May 2012 B2
8183096 Wirbeleit May 2012 B2
8183107 Mathur et al. May 2012 B2
8185865 Gupta et al. May 2012 B2
8187959 Pawlak et al. May 2012 B2
8188542 Yoo et al. May 2012 B2
8196545 Kurosawa Jun 2012 B2
8201122 Dewey, III et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214190 Joshi et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217423 Liu et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225255 Ouyang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8227307 Chen et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236661 Dennard et al. Aug 2012 B2
8239803 Kobayashi Aug 2012 B2
8247300 Babcock et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255843 Chen et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258026 Bulucea Sep 2012 B2
8266567 El Yahyaoui et al. Sep 2012 B2
8273629 Wang et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286180 Foo Oct 2012 B2
8288798 Passlack Oct 2012 B2
8298895 Alptekin Oct 2012 B1
8299562 Li et al. Oct 2012 B2
8324059 Guo et al. Dec 2012 B2
8350327 Chung et al. Jan 2013 B2
8354321 Colombeau et al. Jan 2013 B2
20010014495 Yu Aug 2001 A1
20020042184 Nandakumar et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030006415 Yokogawa et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030047763 Hieda et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030122203 Nishinohara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030173626 Burr Sep 2003 A1
20030183856 Wieczorek et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215992 Sohn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040075118 Heinemann et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075143 Bae et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084731 Matsuda et al. May 2004 A1
20040087090 Grudowski et al. May 2004 A1
20040126947 Sohn Jul 2004 A1
20040175893 Vat et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180488 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20040185629 Mansoori et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050106824 Alberto et al. May 2005 A1
20050116282 Pattanayak et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050250289 Babcock et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050280075 Ema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060022270 Boyd et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060049464 Rao Mar 2006 A1
20060068555 Zhu et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068586 Pain Mar 2006 A1
20060071278 Takao Apr 2006 A1
20060154428 Dokumaci Jul 2006 A1
20060197158 Babcock et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060203581 Joshi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060220114 Miyashita et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060223248 Venugopal et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070040222 Van Camp et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070117326 Tan et al. May 2007 A1
20070158790 Rao Jul 2007 A1
20070212861 Chidambarrao et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070238253 Tucker Oct 2007 A1
20080067589 Ito et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080108208 Arevalo et al. May 2008 A1
20080169493 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169516 Chung Jul 2008 A1
20080197439 Goerlach et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227250 Ranade et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237661 Ranade et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080258198 Bojarczuk et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080272409 Sonkale et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090057746 Sugll et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090108350 Cai et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090134468 Tsuchiya et al. May 2009 A1
20090224319 Kohli Sep 2009 A1
20090302388 Cai et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090309140 Khamankar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311837 Kapoor Dec 2009 A1
20090321849 Miyamura et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100012988 Yang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100038724 Anderson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100100856 Mittal Apr 2010 A1
20100148153 Hudait et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100149854 Vora Jun 2010 A1
20100187641 Zhu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207182 Paschal Aug 2010 A1
20100270600 Inukai et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110059588 Kang Mar 2011 A1
20110073961 Dennard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110074498 Thompson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110079860 Verhulst Apr 2011 A1
20110079861 Shifren et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110095811 Chi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110147828 Murthy et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110169082 Zhu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175170 Wang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180880 Chudzik et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110193164 Zhu Aug 2011 A1
20110212590 Wu et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230039 Mowry et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248352 Shifren Oct 2011 A1
20110294278 Eguchi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110309447 Arghavani et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021594 Gurtej et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120034745 Colombeau et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120056275 Cai et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065920 Nagumo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120108050 Chen et al. May 2012 A1
20120132998 Kwon et al. May 2012 A1
20120138953 Cai et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120146155 Hoentschel et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120167025 Gillespie et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120187491 Zhu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120190177 Kim et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120223363 Kronholz et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0274278 Jul 1988 EP
0312237 Apr 1989 EP
0531621 Mar 1993 EP
0683515 Nov 1995 EP
0889502 Jan 1999 EP
1450394 Aug 2004 EP
59193066 Nov 1984 JP
4186774 Jul 1992 JP
8153873 Jun 1996 JP
8288508 Nov 1996 JP
2004087671 Mar 2004 JP
794094 Jan 2008 KR
WO2011062788 May 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Abiko, H et al., “A Channel Engineering Combined with Channel Epitaxy Optimization and TED Suppression for 0.15μm n-n Gate CMOS Technology”, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest on Technical Papers, pp. 23-24 (1995).
Chau, R et al., “A 50nm Deplated-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST)”, Electron Device Meeting 2001, IEDM Technical Digest, IEEE International, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4 (2001).
Ducroquet, F et al. “Fully Depleted Silicon-On-Insulator nMOSFETs with Tensile Strained High Carbon Content Sil-yCy Channel”, ECS 210th Meeting, Abstract 1033 (2006).
Ernst, T et al., “Nanoselected MOSFET Transistors on Strained Si, SiGe, Ge Layers: Some Integration and Electrical Properties Features”, ECS Trans. 2006, vol. 3, issure 7, pp. 947-961 (2006).
Goesele, U et al., Diffusion Engineering by Carbon in Silicon, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610 (2000).
Hokazona, A et al., “Steep Channel & Halo Profiles Utilizing Boron-Diffusion-Barrier Layers (Si:C) for 32 nm Node and Beyond”, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 112-113 (2008).
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel Profiled in n/pMOS Controlled by Boron-Doped Si:C Layers for Continual Bulk-CMOS Scaling”, IEDM09-676 Symposium, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4 (2009).
Holland, OW and Thomas, DK “A Method to Improve Activiation of Implanted Dopants in SiC”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (2001).
Kotaki, H., et al., “Novel Bulk Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFET (B-DTMOS) with Advanced Isolation (SITOS) and Gate to Shallow-Well Contact (SSS-C) Processes for Ultra Low Power Dual Gate CMOS”, IEDM 96, pp. 459-462 (1996).
Lavéant, P. “Incorporatio, Diffusion and Agglomeration of Cabon in Silicon”, Solid State Phenomena, vols. 82-84, pp. 189-194 (2002).
Noda, K et al., “A 0.1-μm Delta-Doped MOSFET Fabricated with Post-Low-Energy Implanting Selective Epitaxy” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 809-814 (Apr. 1998).
Ohguro, T et al., “An 0.18-μm CMOS for Mixed Digital and Analog Applications with with Zero-Volt-Vth Epitaxial-Channel MOSFETS's”, IEEE Transactions on Electon Devices, vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1378-1383 (Jul. 1999).
Pinacho, R et al., “Carbon in Silicon: Modeling of Diffusion and Clustering Mechanisms”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 1582-1588 (Aug. 2002).
Robertson, LS et al., “The Effect of Impurities on Diffusion and Activation of Ion Implanted Boron in Silicon”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610 (2000).
Scholz, R et al., “Carbon-Induced Undersaturation of Silicon Self-Interstitials”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(2), pp. 200-202 (Jan. 1998).
Scholz, Ret al., “The Contribution of Vacancies to Carbon Out-Diffusion on Silicon”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 392-394 (Jan. 1999).
Stolk, PA et al., “Physical Mechanisms of Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Ion-Implanted Silicon”, J. Appl. Phys. 81(9), pp. 6031-6050 (May 1997).
Thompson, S et al., “MOS Scaling: Transistor Challenges for the 21st Century”, Intel Technology Journal Q3' 1998, pp. 1-19 (1998).
Wann, C. et al., “Channel Profile Optimization and Device Design for Low-Power High-Performance Dynamic-Threshold MOSFET”, IEDM 96, pp. 113-116 (1996).
Werner, P et al., “Carbon Diffusion in Silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 17, pp. 2465-2467 (Oct. 1998).
Yan, Ran-Hong et al., “Scaling the Si MOSFET: From Bulk to SOI to Bulk”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 39, No. 7 (Jul. 1992).
Komaragiri, R. et al., “Depletion-Free Poly Gate Electrode Architecture for Sub 100 Nanometer CMOS Devices with High-K Gate Dielectrics”, IEEE IEDM Tech Dig., San Francisco CA, 833-836 (Dec. 13-15, 2004).
Samsudin, K et al., “Integrating Intrinsic Parameter Fluctuation Description into BSIMSOI to Forecast sub-15nm UTB SOI based 6T SRAM Operation”, Solid-State Electronics (50), pp. 86-93 (2006).
Wong, H et al., “Nanoscale CMOS”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vo. 87, No. 4, pp. 537-570 (Apr. 1999).
Banerjee, et al. “Compensating Non-Optical Effects using Electrically-Driven Optical Proximity Correction”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 7275 7275OE (2009).
Cheng, et al. “Extremely Thin SOI (ETSOI) CMOS with Record Low Variability for Low Power System-on-Chip Applications”, Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) (Dec. 2009).
Cheng, et al. “Fully Depleted Extremely Thin SOI Technology Fabricated by a Novel Integration Scheme Feturing Implant-Free, Zero-Silicon-Loss, and Faceted Raised Source/Drain”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 212-213 (2009).
Drennan, et al., “Implications of Proximity Effects for Analog Design”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 169-176 (Sep. 2006).
Hook, et al. “Lateral Ion Implant Straggle and Mask Proximity Effect”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1946-1951 (Sep. 2003).
Hori, et al., “A 0.1μm CMOS with a Step Channel Profile Formed by Ultra High Vacuum CVD and In-Situ Doped Ions”, Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting, New York, IEEE, US, pp. 909-911 (Dec. 5, 1993).
Matshuashi, et al. “High-Performance Double-Layer Epitaxial-Channel PMOSFET Compatible with a Single Gate CMOSFET”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 36-37 (1996).
Shao, et al., “Boron Diffusion in Silicon: The Anomalies and Control by Point Defect Engineering”, Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, vol. 42, No. 3-4, pp. 65-114 (Nov. 2003).
Sheu, et al. “Modeling the Well-Edge Proximity Effect in Highly Scaled MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 11, pp. 2792-2798 (Nov. 2006).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61511923 Jul 2011 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13459971 Apr 2012 US
Child 13624449 US