Nozzle for cleaving substrates

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6263941
  • Patent Number
    6,263,941
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 10, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 24, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A cleaving tool provides pressurized gas to the edge of a substrate in combination with a sharpened edge to cleave the substrate at a selected interface. The edge of the tool is tapped against the perimeter of a substrate, such as a bonded substrate, and a burst of gas pressure is then applied at approximately the point of contact with the edge of the tool. The combination of mechanical force and gas pressure separates the substrate into two halves at a selected interface, such as a weakened layer in a donor wafer.
Description




RELATED APPLICATIONS




This patent application is related to two of the concurrently filed and commonly assigned patent applications entitled SUBSTRATE CLEAVING TOOL AND METHOD by Bryan et al., U.S. application Ser. No. 09/371,436; NOZZLE FOR CLEAVING SUBSTRATES, by Bryan et al., U.S. application Ser. No. 09/370,958, and METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CLEAVING SUBSTRATES, by Bryan et al., U.S. application Ser. No. 09/371,906, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated for all purposes.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to substrates, such as may be used for integrated circuit fabrication, micro-machining applications, and similar substrates, and more particularly to cleaving hybrid or composite substrates.




Semiconductor device fabrication technology continues to advance in the pursuit of smaller, faster devices. Integrated circuits devices have become more complex, and in many cases, bigger. New materials and methods are being developed to meet these and other performance requirements. For example, many integrated circuits are fabricated on a silicon “wafer”, which was sawn out of a generally round ingot, or boule, and polished on at least one side. Not long ago, silicon wafers typically had a diameter of about 2-4 inches. Then, six inch, and now eight-inch, wafers became commonplace, and the industry is moving toward silicon wafers with a diameter of twelve inches for some applications. The larger diameter wafers can yield more chips per wafer, and improve throughput. Not surprisingly, the larger wafers are generally much more expensive than the smaller wafers.




Many integrated circuit devices are fabricated within a very narrow planar region close to the surface of the wafer. The remainder of the wafer provides mechanical support and may provide other functions, such as impurity gettering or a backside electrical contact. Thus, the semiconductor material may only need to be of device (i.e. high) quality for a thin region near the surface of the wafer. Epitaxial growth processes have been developed to address this issue. Generally, a thin film of high-purity or other high-quality film of semiconductor material is grown on a substrate, which can be the same material, or a different material, than the grown film. Unfortunately, epitaxial growth processes have not been easy to scale for use with the increased wafer diameters, and yields and throughput have suffered.




Wafer bonding is another process that uses a relatively thin film of semiconductor material. In some instances, a thin film of silicon, for example, is bonded to an insulating substrate, such as silicon oxide, to form a semiconductor-oninsulator (“SOI”) structure. Many techniques have been developed to bond one wafer to another, using adhesives, chemical activation, and the like. Some times a bulk wafer of silicon is bonded to an insulating substrate and then the silicon is lapped to the desired thickness, and other times a thin film of silicon is transferred to the insulating wafer.




Other wafer bonding methods have been developed for purposes other than to fabricate SOI substrates, such as transferring a thin film of high-quality semiconductor material onto a semiconductor or other substrate. Alternatively, it may be desirable to produce a thin film of material to form a layer in a micro-electrical-mechanical system (“MEMS”) device. Accordingly, a technique and a device for cleaving substrates is desirable for producing a thin film of material to be transferred and/or for separating bonded wafers from each other, and for other purposes.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a method and apparatus for cleaving substrates, including composite substrates.




In one embodiment, a composite substrate of two wafers bonded together has a perimeter notch resulting from an edge-finishing process, typically performed by the wafer manufacturer, of one or both wafers. The edge of a tool, such as a blade, is tapped against the perimeter notch. It is believed the edge applies a wedging force against the two bonded wafers. The edge may rebound after tapping, or preferably, remain wedged in the notch.




A seal is formed around at least the portion of the perimeter notch that was tapped to define a plenum. A gas source is provided to the plenum to pressurize the plenum and separate the substrate into two halves at a selected plane. In a further embodiment, the wafers are held together prior to separation with a selected pressure to facilitate cleaving the wafers while reducing breakage. In a still further embodiment, the pressure applied to the substrate during the cleave process varies across the substrate in a selected fashion.




In another embodiment, a cleaving tool with an edge impinges on a composite substrate at or near a selected plane. The cleaving tool includes a gas port in the edge that provides a source of gas in the region of impingement. The combination of mechanical (solid-to-solid contact) force and gas pressure separate the composite substrate at a selected plane, with or without a perimeter notch formed by the edge finish of the substrates. In a further embodiment, the application of mechanical force triggers the pulse of gas for a source by actuating a valve for a selected period of time. These and other embodiments of the present invention, as well as some of its advantages and features are described in more detail in conjunction with the text below and attached figures.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1A

to


1


F are simplified cross sections of composite substrates according to embodiments of the present invention;





FIG. 2A

is a simplified illustration of a wafer cleaving system;





FIG. 2B

is a simplified top view of a portion of the wafer cleaving system shown in

FIG. 2A

, further illustrating details of a gas port and an edge seal;





FIG. 2C

is a simplified cross section of a portion of a substrate cleaving apparatus with a substrate disposed in a tool;





FIG. 2D

is a simplified cross section of an O-ring with a formed gas delivery tube;





FIG. 2E

is a simplified flow chart of a process according to the present invention;





FIG. 2F

is a simplified diagram of a wafer cleaving system according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 3A

is a simplified cross section of an O-ring and gas delivery tube with a tubing retainer;





FIG. 3B

is a simplified cross section of an O-ring with a tubing retainer collet;





FIG. 4

is a simplified cross section of a portion of a wafer-cleaving tool having another embodiment of an O-ring and base shell;





FIG. 5

is a simplified representation of the relationship of various elements of a cleave tool and a cleave front;





FIG. 6A

is a simplified sectioned view of an edged tool with an integrated gas port;





FIG. 6B

is a simplified representation of a wafer cleaving system using mechanical force and gas pressure;





FIG. 6C

is a simplified flow chart of a process according to another embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 7

is a simplified diagram of a cleaving method according to an embodiment of the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The present invention relates to a cleaving apparatus, method, and tools. Several situations may arise where it is desirable to cleave a substrate, such as to separate a thin film of material from a donor wafer, or to separate two bonded substrates.




A thin film separation method, known as a controlled-cleave process (“CCP”), is described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/026,027 by Henley and Cheung, filed Feb. 19, 1998, and which is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes. In the CCP process, ions and/or other particles are implanted into a wafer to form a cleave layer within the donor substrate. Energy is then applied to the donor substrate to initiate and propagate a cleave front or fronts that separates a thin film of material from the donor substrate. Typically, a target, or handle, wafer is bonded to the donor wafer between the ion implantation step and the cleave step to form a composite wafer. The thin film remains attached to the handle wafer after cleaving, and may be further processed to enhance the bonding between the thin film and the handle wafer.





FIG. 1A

is a simplified cross section of a portion of a composite substrate


10


formed from a first wafer


12


bonded to a second wafer


14


at an interface


16


. The first wafer has a weakened and/or stressed layer


18


, which may have been formed by implanting protons or other particles (e.g., hydrogen, deuterium, any combination of these) at a selected depth and concentration, using a plasma immersion ion implantation or beam line implantation or diffusion process, for example. The first wafer


12


, as supplied from the manufacturer, has a finished edge


20


in the approximate shape of a truncated cone with rounded corners. The second wafer


14


, as supplied from the manufacturer, also has a finished edge


22


, but in the approximate shape of a bullet nose. The shapes of the wafer edges are given as examples only, and illustrate that a perimeter groove


24


forms between wafers with finished edges. The perimeter groove typically extends essentially around the substrate (except, e.g., in the region of a wafer alignment “flat”), the depth of the groove typically being greater than the wafer alignment error that occurs during bonding. Also, the design of the o-ring allows for mis-alignment.





FIG. 1B

is a simplified cross section of a portion of a composite substrate


26


formed from a first wafer


28


having a finished edge


30


and a second wafer


32


having a flush edge


34


. The edge of the second wafer has not been shaped in a separate edge-finishing process; however, an artifact of a polishing process has left the corner


36


slightly rounded. The mating surfaces of the wafers that are bonded together to form a composite substrate are often polished to provide intimate surface contact in the bonding process. A perimeter groove


38


also forms between a wafer with a finished edge bonded to a wafer with a flush edge.





FIG. 1C

is a simplified cross section of a portion of a composite substrate


40


formed from a first wafer


42


having a flush edge


44


and a second wafer


46


, also having a flush edge


48


. A relatively small notch


50


forms between the wafers as a result of the corner-rounding that occurred during the polishing process; however, this notch may not extend around the perimeter of the composite substrate, depending on the alignment of the wafers to each other.




Other examples of composite substrates are illustrated by diagrams in

FIGS. 1D

to


1


F. These diagrams are merely examples, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims herein. These substrates have been geometrically configured in a manner to enhance the cleaving action and more particularly initiation of the cleaving action. Referring to

FIG. 1D

, substrate


100


includes handle wafer


101


and donor wafer


103


, which includes stressed region


105


. Separation of the donor substrate material will occur at the stressed region using, for example, a controlled cleaving process (“CCP”). In some embodiments, the wafers can include an insulating layer


107


coating, which can be silicon dioxide or the like. Donor wafer includes a recessed region


109


, which can be in a selected region of the periphery of the wafer or can also be surrounding the periphery of the wafer. The recessed region has a width


111


delta and extends to the edge of the wafer. The recessed region also has a depth, which is selected to enhance initiation using, for example, a pressurized static fluid, e.g., liquid, gas. In some applications, the stressed region is exposed, i.e., free from silicon dioxide. Other applications can require a dynamic fluid. The recessed region has a gradual slope, which is not linear, but curved, and extends from the top surface of the donor wafer, extends over the stressed region, and extends to the edge of the donor wafer.




Referring to

FIG. 1E

, substrate


110


includes handle wafer


101


and donor wafer


113


, which includes stressed region


115


. Separation of the donor substrate material will occur at the stressed region using, for example, a controlled cleaving process. In some embodiments, the wafers can include an insulating layer coating (not shown), which can be silicon dioxide or the like. Donor wafer includes a recessed region


118


, which can be in a selected region of the periphery of the wafer or can also be surrounding the periphery of the wafer. The recessed region has a width


119


delta and does not extend to the edge of the wafer. The recessed region is off set from the edge, where a small gap


117


exists between the donor wafer and the handle wafer. The recessed region also has a depth, which is selected to enhance initiation using, for example, a pressurized static fluid. Other applications can require a dynamic fluid. The recessed region has an annular shape or can also be a trench shape, which extends into the donor substrate to the stressed region or slightly above the stressed region at a point where the cleaving initiation can be implemented.




Referring to

FIG. 1F

, substrate


125


includes handle wafer


101


and donor wafer


121


, which includes stressed region


123


. Separation of the donor substrate material will occur at the stressed region using, for example, a controlled cleaving process. In some embodiments, the wafers can include an insulating layer coating (not shown), which can be silicon dioxide or the like. Donor wafer includes a recessed region


122


, which can be in a selected region of the periphery of the wafer or can also be surrounding the periphery of the wafer. The recessed region has a width


131


delta and extends to the edge of the wafer. The recessed region also has a depth, which is selected to enhance initiation using, for example, a pressurized static fluid. Other applications can require a dynamic fluid. The recessed region has an annular shape or can also be a trench shape, which extends into the donor substrate to the stressed region or slightly above the stressed region at a point where the cleaving initiation can be implemented. The recessed region also has a vertical side, which extends from the top of the wafer to the bottom


127


of the recessed region.




The above geometric features can be made using a variety of techniques. For example, they can be made using conventional masking and etching processes. Additionally, they can be made using chemical polishing processes. Furthermore, they can also be made using mechanical processes. Still further, they can be made using any combination of these. Depending upon the application, a number of conventional techniques can be used to form the novel geometric features, which enhance initiation of the cleaving action.





FIG. 2A

is a simplified representation of an apparatus


200


for separating a thin film(s) of material from composite substrates. A cleave tool


202


has a base shell


204


and a top shell


206


that can be separated (e.g. by lifting off or by a hinge mechanism) in order to load a composite substrate


208


. The base shell is fabricated from a “hard” material, such as tooling plate (cast Al—Zn alloy) or other metal. The top shell has a hard, rigid cap


210


and also a compliant pad


212


. The cap is fabricated from tooling plate, while the compliant pad is, for example, a latex sheet approximately ⅛ inch thick with


30


durometer, but could be made of another compliant material, such as silicone, urethane, neoprene, or other rubber, or other compliant material. The compliant pad supports the upper surface of the composite substrate during the cleave process while allowing the composite substrate to expand slightly to separate the composite substrate and transfer a thin film from the donor substrate to the handle substrate.




An O-ring


214


forms a seal around the perimeter edges of the composite substrate. The O-ring is hollow and operates at ambient (atmospheric) pressure to provide a compliance of


30


durometer, but could be sealed and pressurized to control the compliance and sealing force, or could be solid. A gas port


216


, in this case formed by a needle (e.g., tube) extending through the O-ring, provides a source of gas (e.g., static source, pulse) to a perimeter plenum formed by the sealed edge groove of the composite substrate. The O-ring


214


does not have to seal the entire perimeter of the composite substrate, such as if the composite substrate has an alignment flat


218


, as will be discussed below.




Gas is provided from a gas source


220


, such as a dry nitrogen source, but could be other types of gases, such as air, argon, or helium. The gas flow is controlled by a solenoid valve


222


, or similar valve, which controls the gas supplied to the gas port


216


. In a preferred embodiment, the gas source provides gas at a nominal pressure of about 300 psi., and the valve is controlled by a control line


224


to open for 22 msec. to provide a pulse of gas to the gas port


216


. The dynamics of the gas pulse are generally sufficient to initiate and propagate cleaving of the composite substrate. Gas may be lost through leakage between the O-ring and the substrate, especially where the O-ring does not form a seal with the substrate, but such incidental loss appears to not be critical in cleaving the substrate. Multiple pulses of gas may be applied to facilitate cleaving, if necessary. Alternatively, the fluid may be replaced by a liquid or a combination of liquid and gas.




The control line can be a simple switch, or can be controlled by a controller


230


, such as a computer. The controller includes a processor


232


coupled to a computer-readable memory


234


, as well as a display


236


, and a user input


238


, such as a keyboard. The memory


234


can include read-only memory, random-addressable memory, and/or magnetic or optical media such as a floppy disk, a hard disk, or a compact disk. The memory stores a program


240


that configures the substrate cleave system to operate in a selected manner. It is understood that other controllers may be configured differently and have other appropriate block diagrams, or that the cleave system may be operated manually.




A detector


242


may be included to determine whether the cleave process has been completed. An indicator


244


receives a signal from the detector to indicate a change of condition of the composite substrate. The detector


242


can be an infrared source/sensor for example. When a cleave front propagates underneath the detector, the transmitted infrared light changes due to the separation of the wafer, resulting in an optical wedge that causes destructive interference of light at a specific spacing created in the wafer. In an alternative embodiment, an infrared source in the base could illuminate a sensor in the cap. The transmissive path would be altered by the cleave front. Alternatively, the detector could be an ultrasonic transducer, or a heater/temperature sensor. A heater could provide a pulse of heat to the composite substrate, and the thermal decay could indicate whether the composite substrate is intact, providing greater heatsinking and more rapid thermal decay, or whether the substrate has been cleaved. The indicator


242


can be coupled to the controller


230


, or can provide a sensory signal for manual operation. Although the cleave indicator is shown in conjunction with a gas pressure cleave tool, a cleave indicator would be beneficial with other types of cleave tools, such as thermal or mechanical cleave tools.





FIG. 2B

is a simplified top view representing the base


204


and the O-ring


214


, which is shown as sectioned. The gas port


216


is the outlet of needle-like tubing


246


, such as is used to make hypodermic needles. In a preferred embodiment, the tubing is made of type 316 stainless steel with an internal diameter of about 0.010 mm and 0.5 mm outside diameter. The tubing can be a product made by EFD Brand Part Number 5125CH-B. The gas port


216


is located about 10 mils out from the O-ring, i.e., the tubing protrudes out of the O-ring about 10 mils. A pin may be used to form the hole in the O-ring to push the tubing through. The tubing can also include a gas diffusion at its end in some applications.





FIG. 2C

is a simplified cross view of a portion of the cleave tool


202


showing further details of the O-ring


214


, composite substrate


208


and the gas port


216


. The inside diameter of the O-ring is slightly larger than the diameter of the composite substrate, allowing the composite to be easily placed onto the base


204


of the cleave tool


202


. When the top


206


is assembled to the base


204


of the cleave tool


202


, the O-ring


214


is compressed into an oblong shape, moving the gas port


216


toward the center of the substrate and contacting the first edge


250


and the second edge


252


of the composite substrate


208


to seal the edge groove and form a plenum


254


. The gas port


216


is situated within the plenum


254


to pressurize the plenum, thus creating forces to separate the first substrate


251


from the second substrate


253


. If the weakened layer


18


is weaker than the bonding interface


16


, the composite substrate cleaves at the weakened layer and transfers a thin film


256


of the first substrate


253


to the second substrate


251


.




A height adjustment mechanism


258


is provided to accurately align the gas port


216


with the edge groove/plenum. The height adjustment mechanism moves, along with the tubing and gas port, relative to the top/base of the cleave tool, as represented by the arrows


260


. Alignment accuracy within 0.2 mm or less is preferred, and is achieved with a manually adjusted lead screw. Other height adjustment methods may be used, such as a voice coil or stepper motor, and the height adjustment may be controlled by the controller (see FIG.


2


A.). The gas line


223


to the height adjustment mechanism


258


is flexible to allow for the height adjustment. Similarly, the via


262


through the base


204


is larger than the tubing diameter, and may be an over-sized hole or a slot.





FIG. 2D

is a simplified cross section showing a further refinement of the tubing and gas port or fluid port. The tubing


270


has a slight bend


272


, of between about 5-15 degrees that is about 3 mm back from the gas port


274


, so that the bend occurs within the interior of the O-ring


214


. This allows vertical adjustment of the gas port


274


, represented by the arrows


276


, by rotating the tubing


270


, represented by the arrows


278


. Rotational adjustment is used by itself or in conjunction with the height adjustment mechanism (see

FIG. 2C

) for fine, continuous placement of the gas port. Rotating the tubing also allows an operator to confirm that the gas port is within the edge groove by providing tactile feedback as the gas port contacts one edge upon rotation in one direction, and then the other edge as rotation is reversed, if not used in an automated system.





FIG. 2E

is a simplified flow chart representing a process


280


according to the present invention. After placing a substrate on the base (step


282


), the top is closed (step


284


), which compresses the compliant pad against the substrate. As will be discussed in further detail below in relation to

FIG. 5

, the top is closed in a fashion to apply a greater force against the substrate in the regions further from the gas port. In a preferred embodiment of a substrate cleaving tool, closing the top also compresses the perimeter O-ring to form a seal with at least a portion of the perimeter of the substrate.




Next, a pulse of gas is applied to a region on the perimeter of the substrate (step


286


). If the substrate cleaving tool has a cleave indicator, the substrate is then checked for completion of the cleave (step


288


). If the cleave is complete, the process can stop (step


290


). If the cleave is not complete, another pulse of gas may be applied. The subsequent pulse of gas may be of the same duration and pressure, or of a different duration and/or pressure than the initial pulse of gas. It is noted that some substrates are easier to cleave than others, depending on the type of material and pre-cleave treatment (e.g. implant species, dosage, and energy), and that some cleave processes may be consistent and reliable enough to be performed without a cleave indicator.





FIG. 2F

is a simplified diagram of a wafer cleaving system


2000


according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many other variations, alternatives, and modifications. Like reference numerals are used in this Fig. as the previous Figs. for easy referencing, but are not intended to be unduly limiting. Here, the cleaving system


2000


includes a variety of features such as base shell


204


and top shell


206


that can be separated from each other in order to load a composite substrate


208


, e.g., wafers. The base shell is fabricated from a hard and non-compliant material such as tooling plate, plastic, or other metals or combination of metals and plastics. The top shell has a hard, rigid cap


210


, which houses an adjustable plate


2001


. The adjustable plate is made of a flat material, which interfaces between adjustable members


2005


and compliant pad


212


. Each of the adjustable members can adjust the vertical or z-position of the adjustable plate. In a specific embodiment, there are more than one or preferably three or more members, which are spatially placed equal distance from each other on the top shell. Each of the adjustable members is adjusted in a manner to enhance the cleaving action of the composite substrate. The system also can have a plate


2003


and compliant pad


212


on the base shell. Here, the plate on the base shell can be adjustable or fixed depending upon the application. The compliant pads support the faces of the substrate during a cleaving process while allowing such substrate to expand slightly to separate the substrate. The substrate separates a portion of the donor substrate material from the donor substrate.




An O-ring


214


forms a seal around the perimeter edges of the composite substrate. The O-ring is hollow and operates at ambient (atmospheric) pressure to provide a compliance of


30


durometer, but could be sealed and pressurized to control the compliance and sealing force or could be solid. The system also has a fluid port


216


, which provides compressed fluid into the chamber to initiate and maintain a controlled cleavage process.




The system also has clamping means


2007


, which presses the base shell against the top shell. The O-ring is compressed between each of the shells to seal the outer periphery of the substrate against the O-ring. In a specific embodiment, the clamping means is a “Destaco” clamp or three of these clamps, which hold and maintain the base shell to the top shell. In a specific embodiment, the combination of the adjustable members and the clamping means are adjusted to produce a desired pressure gradient on each of the faces of the substrate. The pressure gradient is adjusted by the adjustable members to produce a desired cleaving action. In a specific embodiment, the applied pressure on the substrate faces is greater near the fluid injection point and decreases further away from the fluid injection point. This gradient may improve a cleaving action. Alternatively, the pressure across the faces of each substrate is constant and free from a gradient to improve cleaving action.





FIG. 3A

is a simplified cross section of fine tubing


300


supported by a tubing retainer


302


. The tubing retainer is co-axial with the fine tubing, and is a section of drilled metal rod, for example, glued to the tubing, but could be other material, such as plastic. The tubing retainer


302


supports the fine tubing


300


to the interior surface


304


of the O-ring, thus increasing the stiffness of the tubing assembly and allowing for better height control of the gas port


306


, as well as better durability, and the option of using finer and/or thinner-walled tubing.





FIG. 3B

is a simplified cross section of fine tubing


310


supported by a tubing retainer


312


, which is further supported by a retainer collet


314


. The retainer collet provides additional stiffness to the tubing assembly, and allows sub-assemblies of fine tubing and tubing retainers to be manufactured in anticipation of rapid exchanging of gas ports for maintenance or to configure the cleave system for different substrates. In lieu of a retainer collet, a tubing retainer with a stepped diameter may be manufactured, either out of a single piece of rod, for example, or assembled from multiple pieces.




Although the above injector has been described in terms of tubing, it can also be may other means for supplying gas and/or fluid to the system. Here, the means can include, among others, almost any suitable member that directs fluid into the system. The member can be shaped in a variety of configurations such as a rectangle, a semicircle, or other shape, which is suitable for directing the fluid into the system. The end of the means can be flared, pointed, or any other shape suitable for supplying the fluid. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many other variations, alternatives, and modifications.





FIG. 4

is a simplified cross section of a portion of a cleave tool showing alternative embodiments for the O-ring


414


and the bottom shell


402


. The outer diameter of the O-ring is substantially greater than the thickness of the composite substrate. Additionally, the O-ring does not have a constant thickness, but rather has a thicker section


406


near the gas port. The thicker section of the O-ring where the O-ring will contact the substrate to form an edge seal improves the contact force and stiffens the side of the plenum formed by the O-ring. An O-ring groove


410


is provided in the bottom shell, and a similar groove may be provided in the top shell (not shown), or the top shell may be flat.





FIG. 5

is a simplified diagram representing how force is applied to the top shell (not shown in this figure) to hold it against the bottom shell (not shown in this figure) and thus provide pressure to the composite substrate during the cleave process. A circle


502


as it would lie under the top shell represents the outline of a substrate. The position of the gas port is represented by the contact of a line with the circle


504


. A cleave front is represented by a curved line


506


, propagating in the directions indicated by arrows


508


. The shape of the cleave front is chosen solely for illustrative purposes, and does not necessarily represent the true shape of the cleave front, which depends on many factors, including the prior processing and type of composite substrate being cleaved. Force is applied at three locations, represented by the small circles


510


,


512


,


514


. Force is generated by cam-over clamps mounted to the base shell support structure. The top shell is placed on the base shell, and the clamps are set to force the top shell against the base shell and to compress the O-ring. The force the clamps apply may be adjusted by turning the clamp screw to extend the length of the clamp pad from the frame, as is well known. The nominal force of all clamps is set to provide a pressure on the substrate of about 5 to 50 psia. Then, the clamp screws of the two clamps


510


,


512


nearest the gas port


504


are extended an additional ¼ turn further than the clamp


514


furthest from the gas port. In some embodiments, stops may be disposed on the stage to prevent movement of the substrate, while the force is applied by to the substrate during initiation.




This provides a differential pressure across the substrate. A differential pressure is desirable because of the nature of the cleave initiation and propagation. In most materials of interest, the cleave is essentially a stressed fracture. The energy required to initiate such a fracture may be lowered by providing a local mechanical defect, such as a crack or scratch. Thus, once the cleave is initiated in the low pressure region (near the gas port), higher pressure may be applied to the substrate to keep the cleaved halves from “jumping” and potentially breaking across the face of the half. A sensor, represented by a circle


518


, is placed near the flat of the substrate to determine if the cleave has propagated through the substrate, as discussed above. Alternatively, a constant pressure may be applied, depending on the type of material(s) the substrate is made of, the thickness of the cleaved halves, and the pressure and duration of the gas being applied, and other factors.




A pressure gradient may be important to prevent some composite substrates from flying apart and breaking when cleaved, while allowing the cleave to form and propagate. It is believed the combination of the applied pressure gradient and the compliant pad in the top shell allow the efficient cleaving of composite substrates while avoiding breakage, especially of the donor substrate. It is recognized that other combinations of compliant pads and pressures may obtain similar results, and that different pressures and pressure gradients may be appropriate for different materials or cleave conditions. Similarly, the force may be applied between the top shell and the base shell by a variety of mechanisms, such as pre-set springs, weights, gas or hydraulic cylinders, or even a compliant pad with a graded durometer, the durometer being less near the gas port, where the cleave is initiated.





FIG. 6A

is a simplified sectioned view of a tool


600


that combines a mechanical cleaving action with a pressure cleaving action. The tool has an edge


602


suitable for contacting the edge of a composite wafer. The composite wafer may have a perimeter groove, as shown in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, or may be composed of flush-edged wafers, as shown in FIG.


1


C. The edge of the tool is lightly tapped against the edge of the composite substrate to help initiate a cleave. Gas is admitted to the cleave region via a gas port


616


incorporated into the tool edge to help initiate and/or propagate the cleave formed by the mechanical action of the edge of the tool. In another embodiment, thick walled tubing with a small I.D., or rod with a small center through hole, is sharpened to a chisel edge. Alternatively, the process may be performed in two steps using a razor blade, for example, tapped against the edge of a composite wafer before placing the composite wafer into a cleaving apparatus, as shown in FIG.


2


A.





FIG. 6B

is a simplified illustration of a substrate cleaving apparatus incorporating a tool similar to the tool shown in

FIG. 6A. A

composite substrate


40


formed from two substrates with flush edges, as shown in

FIG. 1C

, is placed in the cleaving tool. An edged tool


601


extends through the O-ring


614


to contact the edge


604


of the composite wafer. The edged tool is tapped against the composite substrate by letting a weight


606


of a selected mass supported by an arm


608


of selected length fall a selected height, h, to contact the edge tool so that the edge of the tool taps the edge of the composite wafer with a selected force and momentum. Other mechanisms can be used to create the desired force, such as a spring-loaded trigger mechanism or a pneumatic cylinder. A force sensor


610


, such as a strain gauge or electrical switch, detects when the weight strikes the edged tool and triggers a pre-set pulse of gas from the gas source


220


, controlled by the valve


222


, which is coupled to the pressure sensor. Additional control structure is not shown for purposes of clarity, as such structure is well known in the art.





FIG. 6C

is a simplified flow chart of a cleave process


620


according to another embodiment of the present invention. A substrate is first tapped with an edged tool as shown in

FIGS. 6A and 6B

. It is believed that this can have many effects that promote cleaving, including providing a wedging force between the eventual cleaved halves of the substrate, initiating a scratch or crack to lower the energy required to initiate a cleave, and to form a small volume for the gas to enter and separate the substrate by gas pressure. After tapping the perimeter of the substrate with the edged tool, gas pressure is applied to the tapped region, as described above. The tapping and gas pressure may be performed essentially concurrently, sequentially in the same substrate cleaving tool, or at different locations and times.





FIG. 7

is a simplified diagram of a cleave initiation process


700


according to an embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize many other variations, alternatives, and modifications. The initiation process shows mechanical member


707


, which can be in at least one or more process stages. Mechanical member includes at least an edge


706


, which can begin separation of the stressed region


703


on the donor substrate. As shown, the donor substrate is bonded to the handle substrate. The member can be at a first location


711


(shown as dotted lines), which is generally outside the periphery of the substrate. The member moves toward the substrate and begins a prying action between the donor and handle substrates, as shown by the structure in reference numeral


709


. The prying action causes a separation of the donor substrate or crack


705


from the surface of the donor substrate toward the stressed layer. Once the separation has been initiated, fluid is supplied through the orifice


713


, which pries the material above the stressed region off of the donor substrate according to the methods described herein. Preferably, the member has a wedge shape, which begins with a pointed region (e.g., sharp, blunt) and extends toward a wider region, where the surfaces of the member pry apart or crack the donor substrate. A top view diagram of the mechanical member illustrates an annular surface


706


, which mates with the profile


711


of the substrate. The annular surface is intended to evenly distribute the mechanical member across a periphery of the substrate. Of course, the profile can also be negatively sloped, square, or positively sloped depending upon the application.




While the above is a complete description of specific embodiments of the present invention, various modifications, variations, and alternatives may be employed. For example, although the substrates discussed have been generally round, substrates of other shapes, such as a rectangular shape, could be used. Specifically, a silicon-on-silicon wafer may be used instead of a silicon-on-insulator wafer, or a silicon carbide, gallium-arsenide, or silicon-germanium wafer may be surface finished. Additionally, the cleaved surface of the donor wafer could be prepared for another thin-film transfer by the above methods. Other variations will be apparent to persons of skill in the art. These equivalents and alternatives are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of this invention should not be limited to the embodiments described, and should instead be defined by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A tool for cleaving a substrate, the tool comprising:a body portion having an end and a face opposite the end; a force sensor disposed on the face, the force sensor providing an output when struck; a chisel edge portion formed on the end of the body portion; and a gas chamber wall defining a gas via through the tool, the via terminating in a gas port disposed along the chisel edge portion of the tool.
  • 2. The tool of claim 1 wherein the gas port is disposed at essentially a center of the chisel edge portion.
  • 3. The tool of claim 1 wherein the body portion is essentially cylindrical and the gas chamber wall defines the via essentially along the center axis of the body portion.
  • 4. The tool of claim 1 wherein the gas port has a diameter of about 0.6 mm.
  • 5. The tool of claim 1 wherein the body portion is stepped to create a first thickness and a second thickness, the first thickness being proximate to the chisel edge portion and being less than the second thickness.
  • 6. The tool of claim 1 wherein the body portion has an essentially rectangular cross section normal to the via.
US Referenced Citations (120)
Number Name Date Kind
1275192 Alexis Aug 1918
1412743 Herfjord Apr 1922
2518273 Bergstrom Aug 1950
2614055 Senarelens Oct 1952
2839221 Demaret Jun 1958
3085454 Federighi Apr 1963
3117022 Bronson et al. Jan 1964
3225820 Riordan Dec 1965
3551213 Boyle Dec 1970
3770499 Crowe et al. Nov 1973
3786359 King Jan 1974
3806380 Kitada et al. Apr 1974
3832219 Nelson et al. Aug 1974
3900636 Curry et al. Aug 1975
3901423 Hillberry et al. Aug 1975
3915757 Engel Oct 1975
3957107 Altoz et al. May 1976
3993909 Drews et al. Nov 1976
4006340 Gorinas Feb 1977
4039416 White Aug 1977
4074139 Pankove Feb 1978
4107350 Berg et al. Aug 1978
4108751 King Aug 1978
4116751 Zaromb Sep 1978
4121334 Wallis Oct 1978
4170662 Weiss et al. Oct 1979
4244348 Wilkes Jan 1981
4252837 Auton Feb 1981
4274004 Kanai Jun 1981
4342631 White et al. Aug 1982
4346123 Kaufmann Aug 1982
4361600 Brown Nov 1982
4368083 Bruel et al. Jan 1983
4412868 Brown et al. Nov 1983
4452644 Bruel et al. Jun 1984
4468309 White Aug 1984
4471003 Cann Sep 1984
4486247 Ecer et al. Dec 1984
4490190 Speri Dec 1984
4500563 Ellenberger et al. Feb 1985
4508056 Bruel et al. Apr 1985
4536657 Bruel Aug 1985
4539050 Kramler et al. Sep 1985
4566403 Fournier Jan 1986
4567505 Pease et al. Jan 1986
4568563 Jackson et al. Feb 1986
4585945 Bruel et al. Apr 1986
4684535 Heinecke et al. Aug 1987
4704302 Bruel et al. Nov 1987
4717683 Parrillo et al. Jan 1988
4727047 Bozler et al. Feb 1988
4764394 Conrad Aug 1988
4837172 Mizuno et al. Jun 1989
4846928 Dolins et al. Jul 1989
4847792 Barna et al. Jul 1989
4853250 Boulos et al. Aug 1989
4883561 Gmitter et al. Nov 1989
4887005 Rough et al. Dec 1989
4894709 Phillips et al. Jan 1990
4931405 Kamijo et al. Jun 1990
4948458 Ogle Aug 1990
4952273 Popov Aug 1990
4960073 Suzuki et al. Oct 1990
4982090 Wittmaack Jan 1991
4996077 Moslehi et al. Feb 1991
5015353 Hubler et al. May 1991
5034343 Rouse et al. Jul 1991
5070040 Pankove Dec 1991
5082793 Li Jan 1992
5110748 Sarma May 1992
5133826 Dandl Jul 1992
5196355 Wittkower Mar 1993
5198371 Li Mar 1993
5202095 Houchin et al. Apr 1993
5203960 Dandl Apr 1993
5213451 Frank May 1993
5234529 Johnson Aug 1993
5234535 Beyer et al. Aug 1993
5242861 Inaba Sep 1993
5250328 Otto Oct 1993
5252178 Moslehi Oct 1993
5269880 Jolly et al. Dec 1993
5273610 Thomas, III et al. Dec 1993
5304509 Sopori Apr 1994
5342472 Imahashi et al. Aug 1994
5354381 Sheng Oct 1994
5363603 Miller et al. Nov 1994
5368710 Chen et al. Nov 1994
5370765 Dandl Dec 1994
5374564 Bruel Dec 1994
5376560 Aronowitz et al. Dec 1994
5404079 Ohkuni et al. Apr 1995
5405480 Benzing et al. Apr 1995
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995
5435880 Minato et al. Jul 1995
5476691 Komvopoulos et al. Dec 1995
5487785 Horiike et al. Jan 1996
5494835 Bruel Feb 1996
5504328 Bonser Apr 1996
5558718 Leung Sep 1996
5559043 Bruel Sep 1996
5585304 Hayashi et al. Dec 1996
5611855 Wijaranakula Mar 1997
5643834 Harada et al. Jul 1997
5653811 Chan Aug 1997
5705421 Matsushita et al. Jan 1998
5710057 Kenney Jan 1998
5714395 Bruel Feb 1998
5755914 Yonehara May 1998
5783022 Cha et al. Jul 1998
5804086 Bruel Sep 1998
5854123 Sato et al. Dec 1998
5869387 Sato et al. Feb 1999
5877070 Goesele et al. Mar 1999
5882987 Srikrishnan Mar 1999
5920764 Hanson et al. Jul 1999
5953622 Lee et al. Sep 1999
5966620 Sakaguchi et al. Oct 1999
5994207 Henley et al. Nov 1999
6077383 Laporte Jun 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (63)
Number Date Country
834363 Mar 1952 DE
0084287 Jul 1983 EP
0099778 Feb 1984 EP
0155875 Feb 1984 EP
0112238 Jun 1984 EP
0164281 Dec 1985 EP
0112230 Apr 1987 EP
0181249 Jun 1989 EP
0504714 Sep 1992 EP
0533551 Mar 1993 EP
0355913 Dec 1993 EP
0665588 Feb 1995 EP
0660140 Jun 1995 EP
0665587 Aug 1995 EP
0379828 Sep 1995 EP
0459177 Dec 1995 EP
0703609 Mar 1996 EP
0763849 Mar 1997 EP
0867921 Mar 1998 EP
0867917 Mar 1998 EP
1558881 Jan 1969 FR
2261802 Feb 1974 FR
2235474 Apr 1974 FR
2298880 Jan 1975 FR
2266304 Apr 1975 FR
2519437 Jan 1982 FR
2529383 Jun 1982 FR
2537768 Aug 1982 FR
2537777 Dec 1982 FR
2715502 Jan 1984 FR
2560426 Feb 1984 FR
2563377 Apr 1984 FR
2575601 Dec 1984 FR
2681472 Sep 1991 FR
2714524 Dec 1993 FR
2715501 Jan 1994 FR
2715503 Jan 1994 FR
2720189 May 1994 FR
2725074 Sep 1994 FR
2221991 Jul 1989 GB
60-235434 Nov 1958 JP
53-104156 Sep 1978 JP
58-144475 Aug 1983 JP
60-83591 Oct 1983 JP
59-19394 Jan 1984 JP
59-54217A Mar 1984 JP
59-46750 Mar 1984 JP
59-114744 Jul 1984 JP
59-139539 Aug 1984 JP
60-207237 Oct 1985 JP
4-76503 Jul 1990 JP
2901031 Jan 1992 JP
2910001 Jan 1992 JP
4-246594 Sep 1992 JP
5-211128 Aug 1993 JP
7-215800 Aug 1995 JP
7-254690 Oct 1995 JP
7-263291 Oct 1995 JP
8-97389 Apr 1996 JP
WO 9510718 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9520824 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9531825 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9935674 Jul 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (30)
Entry
Choyke et al., “Mechanical Response of Single Crystal Si to Very High Fluence H+ Implantation,” Nuc. Instr. Meth., 209-210:407-412 (1983).
Choyke et al., “Implanted Hydrogen Effects at High Concentrations in Model Low Z Shielding Materials,” J. Nuc. Mtrls., 122-23:1585-86 (1984).
Choyke et al., “A Comparative Study of Near-Surface Effects Due to Very High Fluence H+ Implantation in Single Crystal FZ, CZ, and Web SI,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 27:359-364 (1984).
Corbett et al., “Embrittlement of Materials: Si(H) as a Model System,” J. Nuc. Mtrls., 169: 179-184 (1989).
Johnson et al., “Hydrogen-Induced Platelets in Silicon: Separation of Nucleation and Growth,” Mtrls. Sci. Forum, 83-87:33-38 (1992).
Milnes et al., “Peeled Film Technology for solar Cells,” pp. 338-341.
Oshima et al., “Defects in Si irradiated with D-T neutrons, D and He ions,” J. Nuc. Mtrls., 179-181:947-950 (1991).
Alles, Michael et al., “Thin Film Silicon on Insulator: An Enabling Technology,” Semiconductor International, pp. 67-72 (1997).
Basta, Nicholas, “Ion-Beam Implantation,” High Technology, (1985).
Burggraff, Peter, “Advanced Plasma Source: What's Working?” Semiconductor International, pp. 56-59 (May 1994.).
Cassidy, Victor M., “Ion Implantation Process Toughens Metalworking Tools,” Modern Metals, pp. 65-67 (1984).
Cheung, N.W., “Plasma Immersion Ion Implanation for Semiconductor Processing,” Material Chemistry and Physics, vol. 46, Nos. 2-3, pp. 132-139 (Oct. 1996).
Chu, P.K. et al. “Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation—A Fledgling Technique for Semiconductor Processing,” Materials Science and Engineering Reports: A Review Journal, vol. R17, Nos. 6-7, pp. 207-280 (Nov. 30, 1996).
Chu, Paul K. et al., “Recent Applications of Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation,” Semiconductor International, pp. 165-172 (1996).
Chu, Paul K., “Synthesis of SOI Materials Using Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation,” 1997 Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 438, pp. 333-343 (1997).
Carter, G. et al., “The Collection of IONS Implanted in Semiconductors Radiation Effects,” Abstract only, vol. 16 Nos. 1-2, pp. 107-114 (Sep. 1972).
Hulett, D.M. et al., “Ion Nitriding and Ion Implantation: A Comparison,” Metal Progress, pp. 18-21 (1985).
I.B.M. Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 29: No. 3, p. 1416 (Aug. 1986).
Lee, B.H. et al., “A Novel Pattern Transfer Process for Bonded SOI Giga-bit DRAMS,” 1996 IEEE Int'l SOI Conference Proceedings, IEEE Electron Devices Society, (1996).
Li, J., “Novel Semiconductor Substrate Formed by Hydrogen Ion Implantation into Silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 55: No. 21, pp. 2223-2224 (Nov. 20, 1989).
Lu, X. et al., “SOI Material Technology Using Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation,” Proceedings 1996 IEEE International SOI Conference (Oct. 1996).
Matsuda et al., “Large Diameter Ion Beam Implantation System,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. B21, pp. 314-316 (1987).
Moreau, Wayne M., “Semiconductor Lithography, Principles, Practices, and Materials,” Plenum Press (1988).
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 7, No. 107 (E-174), (May 11, 1993) JP-58-030145 (Feb. 22, 1983).
Picraux, S. Thomas et al., “Ion Implantation of Surfaces,” Scientific American, vol. 252, No. 3, pp. 102-113 (1985).
Renier, M. et al., “A New Low-Energy Ion Implanter for Bombardment of Cylindrical Surfaces,” Vacuum, vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 577-578 (1985).
Sioshansi, Piran, “Ion Beam Modification of Materials for Industry,” Thin Solid Film, vol. 118, pp. 61-71 (1984).
Wolf, Stanley Ph.D., Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 2, pp. 66-79, Lattice Press (1990).
U.S. Dept. of Energy, “The Fusion Connection: . . . ”, Plasma Coating, pp. 6-7 (1985).
Veldkamp, W.B. et al., Binary Optics, Scientific American, pp. 50-55 (May 1992).