This disclosure relates to on-chip testing for jitter in integrated circuit (“IC”) components.
Jitter is the deviation of a timing event of a signal from its ideal position. Data errors result when this deviation extends past the sampling point at the receiver. A built-in self-test (“BIST”) structure is sometimes included as part of an integrated circuit to test for jitter in components of the integrated circuit. Such an on-chip testing structure allows for internal testing of integrated circuit components instead of more time-consuming external tests.
Some BIST structures for jitter are based on statistical analysis of time measurement testing. These tests calculate the jitter using standard deviation computations with embedded time to digital converters (“TDC”). High accuracy using these converters may be difficult to achieve because TDCs can be sensitive to crosstalk, substrate and power supply noise.
There are different types of jitter. Total jitter is the convolution of all independent jitter processes; deterministic, or systematic, jitter and random, or non-systematic, jitter. Deterministic jitter is due to non-Gaussian processes and has a bounded amplitude and a specific cause. Deterministic jitter may include jitter resulting from duty cycle distortion, data dependent jitter (e.g., inter-symbol interference-ISI), sinusoidal jitter, and un-correlated (to the data) bounded jitter. Deterministic jitter is measured as a peak-to-peak value and sums linearly.
Random jitter is characterized by a Gaussian distribution and is assumed to be unbounded. It is often measured in root-mean-square value, which equals the standard deviation (σ) in a Gaussian process.
Because random jitter can be modeled as a Gaussian distribution it can be used to predict peak-to-peak jitter as a function of a bit error rate (“BER”).
The delay line 20 is used to simulate jitter contribution in a system cascade in which the CUT 18 is inserted. Delaying the clock signal 16 under test edge so it becomes closer to the reference edge makes more jitter values appear as bit errors. For example, if the delay line 20 is adjusted so that the difference between the delayed CUT output and the reference signal equals a specified intrinsic jitter RMS value, the number of bit errors obtained can be interpreted as the BER that the circuit would yield in a cascade that contributes jitter near the specified value.
The different delay values of the delay line 32 may be characterized prior to any measurements using a ring oscillator circuit into which the delay line is inserted. For every step of the delay line's value variations, bit errors are counted by the recovery and BER circuitry 34 during a fixed interval of time. These counts can be used to create a graph representing the number of errors as a function of the delay between the two clocks.
If the jitter has a normal distribution, the standard deviation of the time interval to be measured can be computed as a difference between the times that correspond to 84% and 64% of the final CDF value. To interpret the results, a lookup table such as the one shown in
Various features of the system may be implemented in hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software. For example, some aspects of this disclosure can be implemented in computer programs executing on programmable computers. Each program can be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. Furthermore, each such computer program can be stored on a storage medium, such as read only memory (“ROM”) readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer, for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium is read by the computer to perform the functions described above.
Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4164648 | Chu | Aug 1979 | A |
5489466 | Inaba et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5590341 | Matter | Dec 1996 | A |
5663991 | Kelkar et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5703838 | Gorbics et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5793822 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6295315 | Frisch et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6421794 | Chen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448754 | Ihs et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6657467 | Seki et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670800 | Beach et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6747470 | Muhtaroglu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6777921 | Abdennadher et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6836872 | Abdennadher | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6822491 | Fattouh et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868534 | Fattouh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6934307 | DeCusatis et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020190283 | Seno | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030112027 | Muhtaroglu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141859 | Abdennadher et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177427 | Fattouh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030210028 | Beach et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040060017 | Abdennadher | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085085 | Muhtaroglu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040128591 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |