The embodiments relate to an integrated circuit manufacture, more particularly, to manufacturing more efficient CMOS image sensors.
An image sensor has a large number of identical sensor elements (pixels), generally greater than 1 million, in a Cartesian (square) grid. The distance between adjacent pixels is called the pitch (p). The area of a pixel is p2. The area of the photosensitive element, i.e., the area of the pixel that is sensitive to light for conversion to an electrical signal, is normally only about 20% to 30% of the surface area of the pixel.
The challenge of a designer is to channel as much of the light impinging on the pixel to the photosensitive element of the pixel. There are a number of factors that diminish the amount of light from reaching the photosensitive element. One factor is the manner in which the image sensor is constructed. A complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor is manufactured by a process of etching and depositing a number of layers of oxides of silicon, metal and nitride on top of crystalline silicon. The layers of a typical sensor are listed in Table I and shown in
In Table I, typically the first layer on a silicon substrate is the ILD layer and the topmost layer is the overcoat. In Table I, ILD refers to a inter-level dielectric layer, METAL1, METAL2 and METAL3 refer to different metal layers, IMD1B, IMD2B and IMD5B refer to different inter-metal dielectric layers which are spacer layers, PASS1, PASS2 and PASS3 refer to different passivation layers (typically dielectric layers).
The total thickness of the layers above the silicon substrate of the image sensor is the stack height (s) of the image sensor and is the sum of the thickness of the individual layers. In the example of Table I, the sum of the thickness of the individual layers is about 11.6 micrometers (μm).
The space above the photosensitive element of a pixel must be transparent to light to allow incident light from a full color scene to impinge on the photosensitive element located in the silicon substrate. Consequently, no metal layers are routed across the photosensitive element of a pixel, leaving the layers directly above the photosensitive element clear.
The pixel pitch to stack height ratio (p/s) determines the cone of light (F number) that can be accepted by the pixel and conveyed to the photosensitive element on the silicon. As pixels become smaller and the stack height increases, this number decreases, thereby lowering the efficiency of the pixel.
More importantly, the increased stack height with greater number of metal layers obscure the light from being transmitted through the stack to reach the photosensitive element, in particular of the rays that impinge the sensor element at an angle. One solution is to decrease the stack height by a significant amount (i.e., >2 μm). However, this solution is difficult to achieve in a standard CMOS process.
Another issue, which possibly is the one that most limits the performance of the conventional image sensors, is that less than about one-third of the light impinging on the image sensor is transmitted to the photosensitive element such as a photodiode. In the conventional image sensors, in order to distinguish the three components of light so that the colors from a full color scene can be reproduced, two of the components of light are filtered out for each pixel using a filter. For example, the red pixel has a filter that absorbs green and blue light, only allowing red light to pass to the sensor.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here.
This disclosure is drawn, inter alia, to methods, apparatus, systems, and devices related to an image sensor and compound pixels. An embodiment relates to a method for increasing the efficiency of an image sensor. Another embodiment provides a means for eliminating the color filter so that more than only one-third of the impinging light is use to produce an electrical signal. Another embodiment relates to a method for increasing the efficiency of an image sensor by increasing the amount of electromagnetic radiation such as light impinging on the image sensor. An embodiment of the image sensor comprises an optical pipe such as a light pipe to transfer electromagnetic radiation incident on the image sensor to the photosensitive element on or within the substrate of the image sensor. The optical pipe include of a high refraction index core with a lower refraction index cladding. The end of the optical pipe adjacent to the photosensitive element is about the same size as the photosensitive element so that most or all of the electromagnetic radiation in the pipe impinges on the photosensitive element. A coupler that may take the shape of a micro lens efficiently could be located on the optical pipe to collect and guide the electromagnetic radiation into the optical pipe.
Another embodiment relates to use the optical pipe to eliminate pigmented color filters that absorb about ⅔ of the light that impinges on the image sensor. The core and the cladding of the optical pipe could function as waveguides. Waveguides do not absorb light like color filters, but can be designed to selectively transmit selected wavelengths.
A waveguide has a cutoff wavelength that is the lowest frequency that the waveguide can propagate. As a result, a waveguide in the core whose cutoff wavelength is at green will not propagate red light, and a waveguide in the core whose cutoff wavelength is at blue will not propagate red and green light. In one implementation, a blue waveguide and a blue/green waveguide could be embedded within a white waveguide, which could be in the cladding. For example, any blue light could remain in the blue waveguide in a core, any blue or green light could remain in the green/blue waveguide of another core, and the remainder of the light could remain in the white waveguide in one or more the claddings.
An embodiment relates to an image sensor comprising (a) a optical pipe comprising a core and a cladding, and (b) a pair of photosensitive elements comprising a central photosensitive element and a peripheral photosensitive element, wherein the central photosensitive element is operably coupled to the core and the peripheral photosensitive element is operably coupled to the cladding. Preferably, the image sensor comprises no color filter, or optionally it could comprise a color filter. Preferably, the optical pipe is circular, non-circular or conical. Preferably, the core has a core index of refraction (n1) and the cladding has a cladding index of refraction (n2), and further wherein n1 is greater than n2. Preferably, the optical pipe is configured to separate wavelengths of an electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the image sensor at a cutoff wavelength through the core and the cladding. Preferably, the optical pipe is configured to separate wavelengths of an electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the image sensor at a cutoff wavelength through the core and the cladding without a color filter. Preferably, an electromagnetic radiation beam receiving end of the optical pipe comprises a curved surface. Preferably, the core has a greater cross-sectional area at an electromagnetic radiation beam receiving end of the core than that at an electromagnetic radiation beam emitting end of the core. Preferably, the pair of photosensitive elements are located on or within a substrate.
The image sensor could further comprise a lens structure or an optical coupler over the optical pipe, wherein the lens structure or the optical coupler is operably coupled to the optical pipe. Preferably, the core comprises a first waveguide having a cutoff wavelength such that electromagnetic radiation of wavelength greater than the cutoff wavelength leaks out from the core into the cladding. Preferably, the cladding comprises a second waveguide that permits electromagnetic radiation of wavelength of greater than the cutoff wavelength to remains within the cladding and be transmitted to the peripheral photosensitive element. Preferably, a cross-sectional area of the core at an electromagnetic radiation beam emitting end of the core is substantially equal to an area of the central photosensitive element. Preferably, a cross-sectional area of the cladding at an electromagnetic radiation beam emitting end of the cladding is substantially equal to an area of the peripheral photosensitive element.
The image sensor could further comprise a stack surrounding the optical pipe, the stack comprising metallic layers embedded in dielectric layers, wherein the dielectric layers have a lower refractive index than that of the cladding. Preferably, a surface of the stack comprises a reflective surface. Preferably, the image sensor is a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor. Preferably, the optical is could also be used for charge-coupled devices (CCD). Preferably, an amount of an electromagnetic radiation beam impinging on the image sensor is transmitted to the photosensitive element is greater than about a third of the electromagnetic radiation beam impinging on the image sensor. Preferably, the core has a core index of refraction (n1), the cladding has a cladding index of refraction (n2), and the stack has a stack refractive index (n3), and further wherein n1>n2>n3. Preferably, the photosensitive element comprises a photodiode. Preferably, the core is the first waveguide and the cladding is the second waveguide. Preferably, the lens structure or the optical coupler comprises a curved surface and a flat surface such that the lens structure or the optical coupler is shaped as a stationary liquid droplet. Preferably, the lens structure or the optical coupler comprises a first opening and a second opening with the first opening being larger than the second opening, and a connecting surface extending between the first and second openings. Preferably, a diameter of the first opening is substantially the same as a diameter of the cladding and a diameter of the second opening is substantially the same as a diameter of the core. Preferably, the connecting surface is flat or curved. Preferably, the connecting surface comprises a reflective surface.
Another embodiment relates to a compound pixel comprising at least two different image sensors, each image sensor comprising (a) a optical pipe comprising a core and a cladding, and (b) a pair of photosensitive elements comprising a central photosensitive element and a peripheral photosensitive element, wherein the central photosensitive element is operably coupled to the core and the peripheral photosensitive element is operably coupled to the cladding, wherein each of the at least two different image sensors is configured to separate wavelengths of an electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the compound pixel at a cutoff wavelength, and the compound pixel is configured to reconstruct a spectrum of wavelengths of the electromagnetic radiation beam. Preferably, the core comprises a first waveguide having the cutoff wavelength such that electromagnetic radiation of wavelength greater than the cutoff wavelength leaks out from the core into the cladding, further wherein the cutoff wavelength of the core of each of the at least two different image sensors is different such that the at least two different image sensors separate the electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the compound pixel at different cutoff wavelengths. Preferably, the cladding comprises a second waveguide that permits electromagnetic radiation of wavelength of greater than the cutoff wavelength to remains within the cladding and be transmitted to the peripheral photosensitive element. Preferably, a cross-sectional area of the cladding at an electromagnetic radiation beam emitting end of the cladding is substantially equal to an area of the peripheral photosensitive element. The compound pixel could further comprise a stack of metallic and non-metallic layers surrounding the optical pipe of each of the at least two different optical sensors.
Another embodiment relates to a compound pixel comprising at least a first image sensor and a second image sensor, wherein the first image sensor is configured to provide a first separation of an electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the image sensor at a first cutoff wavelength without any color filter, the second image sensor is configured to provide a second separation of the electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the image sensor at a second cutoff wavelength without any color filter, the first cutoff wavelength is different from the second cutoff wavelength, and the compound pixel is configured to reconstruct a spectrum of wavelengths of the electromagnetic radiation beam. Preferably, the first image sensor comprises a first waveguide having the first cutoff wavelength such that electromagnetic radiation of wavelength greater than the first cutoff wavelength leaks out from the first waveguide, wherein the second image sensor comprises a second waveguide having the second cutoff wavelength such that electromagnetic radiation of wavelength greater than the second cutoff wavelength leaks out from the second, further wherein the first cutoff wavelength is different from the second cutoff wavelength. Preferably, the first image sensor further comprises a first white waveguide that permits electromagnetic radiation of wavelength of greater than the first cutoff wavelength to remains within the first white waveguide and the second image sensor further comprises a second white waveguide that permits electromagnetic radiation of wavelength of greater than the second cutoff wavelength to remains within the second white waveguide. Preferably, the first image sensor comprises a first pair of photosensitive elements and the second image sensor comprises a second pair of photosensitive elements. The compound pixel could further comprise a stack of metallic and non-metallic layers in the vicinity of the first and second waveguides. Preferably, the two different image sensors comprise cores of different diameters. Preferably, the first image sensor comprises a core of a different diameter than that of the second image sensor.
Another embodiment relates to a method of manufacturing an image sensor, comprising (a) forming a pair of photosensitive elements comprising a central photosensitive element and a peripheral photosensitive element, and (b) forming a optical pipe comprising a core and a cladding, wherein the central photosensitive element is operably coupled to the core and the peripheral photosensitive element is operably coupled to the cladding.
The embodiments relate to a high efficiency image sensor and a method for increasing the efficiency of an image sensor. The efficiency could be increased when more of the light impinging on an image sensor is received by the photosensitive element and converted to an electrical signal.
The method of manufacturing an embodiment of the image sensor (
Each of the photosensitive elements (photosensors) typically comprises a photodiode, although not limited to only a photodiode. Typically, the photodiode is doped to a concentration from about 1e(E)16 to about 1e(E)18 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter, while using an appropriate dopant.
The layers 1-11 in
The dielectric material-containing layers may be formed using methods appropriate to their materials of composition. Non-limiting examples of methods include thermal or plasma oxidation or nitridation methods, chemical vapor deposition methods (including atomic layer chemical vapor deposition methods) and physical vapor deposition methods.
The metal-containing layers could function as electrodes. Non-limiting examples include certain metals, metal alloys, metal silicides and metal nitrides, as well as doped polysilicon materials (i.e., having a dopant concentration from about 1e18 to about 1e22 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter) and polycide (i.e., doped polysilicon/metal silicide stack) materials. The metal-containing layers may be deposited using any of several methods. Non-limiting examples include chemical vapor deposition methods (also including atomic layer chemical vapor deposition methods) and physical vapor deposition methods. The metal-containing layers could comprise a doped polysilicon material (having a thickness typically in the range 1000 to 1500 Angstrom) from about 1000 to about 1500 angstroms.
The dielectric and metallization stack layer comprises a series of dielectric passivation layers. Also embedded within the stack layer are interconnected metallization layers. Components for the pair of interconnected metallization layers include, but are not limited to contact studs, interconnection layers, interconnection studs.
The individual metallization interconnection studs and metallization interconnection layers that could be used within the interconnected metallization layers may comprise any of several metallization materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Non-limiting examples include certain metals, metal alloys, metal nitrides and metal silicides. Most common are aluminum metallization materials and copper metallization materials, either of which often includes a barrier metallization material, as discussed in greater detail below. Types of metallization materials may differ as a function of size and location within a semiconductor structure. Smaller and lower-lying metallization features typically comprise copper containing conductor materials. Larger and upper-lying metallization features typically comprise aluminum containing conductor materials.
The series of dielectric passivation layers may also comprise any of several dielectric materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Included are generally higher dielectric constant dielectric materials having a dielectric constant from 4 to about 20. Non-limiting examples that are included within this group are oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon. For example, the series of dielectric layers may also comprise generally lower dielectric constant dielectric materials having a dielectric constant from about 2 to about 4. Included but not limiting within this group are hydrogels, aerogels, silsesquioxane spin-on-glass dielectric materials, fluorinated glass materials and organic polymer materials.
Typically, the dielectric and metallization stack layer comprises interconnected metallization layers and discrete metallization layers comprising at least one of copper metallization materials and aluminum metallization materials. The dielectric and metallization stack layer also comprises dielectric passivation layers that also comprise at least one of the generally lower dielectric constant dielectric materials disclosed above. The dielectric and metallization stack layer could have an overall thickness from about 1 to about 4 microns. It may comprise from about 2 to about 4 discrete horizontal dielectric and metallization component layers within a stack.
The layers of the stack layer could be patterned to form patterned dielectric and metallization stack layer using methods and materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art, and appropriate to the materials from which are formed the series of dielectric passivation layers. The dielectric and metallization stack layer may not be patterned at a location that includes a metallization feature located completely therein. The dielectric and metallization stack layer may be patterned using wet chemical etch methods, dry plasma etch methods or aggregate methods thereof. Dry plasma etch methods as well as e-beam etching if the dimension needs to be very small, are generally preferred insofar as they provide enhanced sidewall profile control when forming the series of patterned dielectric and metallization stack layer.
The planarizing layer 11 may comprise any of several optically transparent planarizing materials. Non-limiting examples include spin-on-glass planarizing materials and organic polymer planarizing materials. The planarizing layer 11 could extend above the optical pipe such that the planarizing layer 11 would have a thickness sufficient to at least planarize the opening of the optical pipe 22, thus providing a planar surface for fabrication of additional structures within the CMOS image sensor whose schematic cross-sectional diagram is illustrated in
Optionally, as shown in
The spacer layer (13) could be one or more layers made of any material that physically, but not optically, separates the stacking layers from the micro lens (14). The spacer layer could be formed of a dielectric spacer material or a laminate of dielectric spacer materials, although spacer layers formed of conductor materials are also known. Oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon are commonly used as dielectric spacer materials. Oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of other elements are not excluded. The dielectric spacer materials may be deposited using methods analogous, equivalent or identical to the methods described above. The spacer layer could be formed using a blanket layer deposition and etchback method that provides the spacer layer with the characteristic inward pointed shape.
The micro lens (14) may comprise any of several optically transparent lens materials that are known in the art. The lens layers may comprise any of several optically transparent lens materials that are known in the art. Non-limiting examples include optically transparent inorganic materials, optically transparent organic materials and optically transparent composite materials. Most common are optically transparent organic materials. Typically the lens layers could be formed incident to patterning and reflow of an organic polymer material that has a glass transition temperature lower than the series of color filter layers 12, if present, or the patterned planarizing layer 11.
In the optical pipe 22, the high index material could, for example, be silicon nitride having a refractive index of about 2.0. The lower index cladding layer material could, for example, be a glass, for example a material selected from Table II, having a refractive index about 1.5.
In Table II, PESiN refers to plasma enhanced SiN and PESiO refers to plasma enhanced SiO.
Preferably, the cross sectional area of the end of the optical pipe adjacent to the photosensitive element is about the same size as the area of the photosensitive element. Otherwise, electromagnetic radiation guided through the optical pipe outside of the photosensitive element could impinge on non-sensitive regions of the substrate, thereby reducing the amount of light converted to an electrical signal and reducing the efficiency of the image sensor.
Optionally, a micro lens could be located on the optical pipe near the incident electromagnetic radiation beam receiving end of the image sensor. The function of the micro lens or in more general terms is to be a coupler, i.e., to couple the incident electromagnetic radiation beam into the optical pipe. If one were to choose a micro lens as the coupler, its distance from the optical pipe would be much shorter than to the photosensitive element, so the constraints on its curvature are much less stringent, thereby making it implementable with existing fabrication technology.
The shape of the optical pipe could be different for different embodiments. In one configuration, the optical pipe could cylindrical, that is, the diameter of the pipe remains the substantially the same throughout the length of the optical pipe. In another configuration, the optical pipe could conical, where the upper diameter of the cross sectional area of the optical pipe could be greater than the lower diameter of the cross sectional area of the optical pipe. The terms “upper” and “lower” refer to the ends of the optical pipe located closer to the incident electromagnetic radiation beam receiving and exiting ends of the image sensor. Other shapes include a stack of conical sections.
Table II lists several different glasses and their refractive indices. These glasses could be used for the manufacture of the optical pipe such that refractive index of the core is higher than that of the cladding. The CMOS image sensors of the embodiments could be fabricated using different transparent glasses having different refractive indices without the use of pigmented color filters. As waveguides of the embodiments do not absorb light like color filters, but may be designed to selectively transmit selected wavelengths, the light transmission efficiency of the optical pipe could be at least 50%, more preferably at least 75%, most preferably at least 99%, i.e., substantially 100%. With the proper arrangement of waveguides in the optical pipe of the embodiments, it is possible to more efficiently transmit the electromagnetic radiation beam incident on the image sensor to the photosensitive element, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the sensor.
In some embodiments, the optical pipe could be circular in or cross section so as to function as a circular waveguide characterized by the following parameters: (1) the core radius (Rc); (2) the core index of refraction (n1); and (3) the cladding index of refraction (n2). These parameters could generally determine the wavelength of light that can propagate through the waveguide. A waveguide has a cutoff wavelength, λct. The portion of the incident electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths longer than the cutoff wavelength would not be confined with the core. As a result, an optical pipe that functions as a waveguide whose cutoff wavelength is at green will not propagate red light though the core, and an optical pipe that functions as a waveguide whose cutoff wavelength is at blue will not propagate red and green light through the core.
By nesting optical pipes that function as waveguides and using a micro lens coupler as shown in
Each physical pixel of a device containing an image sensor of the embodiments disclosed herein would have two outputs representing the complementary colors, e.g., (cyan, red) designated as output type 1 or (yellow, blue) designated as output type 2. These outputs would be arranged as follows:
Each physical pixel would have complete luminance information obtained by combining its two complementary outputs. As a result, the same image sensor can be used either as a full resolution black and white or full color sensor.
In the embodiments of the image sensors disclosed herein, the full spectrum of wavelengths of the incident electromagnetic radiation beam (e.g., the full color information of the incident light) could be obtained by the appropriate combination of two adjacent pixels either horizontally or vertically as opposed to 4 pixels for the conventional Bayer pattern.
The image sensors of the embodiments disclosed herein would have a three-fold impact on the future of CMOS image sensor technology.
The first impact would be the increase in the F-number, or the light acceptance cone of each pixel, thereby increasing the overall efficiency of the sensor. Also, with the embodiments disclosed herein, the F-number of the sensor would be relatively insensitive to stack height (distance of the surface of the micro lens to the photodiode). Thus, stack eights of 10 microns or greater could be easily accommodated.
The second impact would be the elimination of color filters (unless desired for some other purposes) whose light absorption characteristics reduce the sensitivity of the conventional image sensor by about a factor of three.
The third impact would stem from the fact that advanced CMOS fabrication processes use metals and materials that may compromise the transparency of the electromagnetic radiation beam such as light propagating through all the metal layers stacked on top of the photoelectric element such as a photodiode. An optical pipe of the embodiments disclosed herein would provide a solution to this problem. Also, the system of the embodiments disclosed herein would decouple the light path of the image sensor, i.e., the optical pipe, from impurities that may be introduced during fabrication of patterned stacked layers of the image sensor. The optical pipe itself, however, should be fabricated with low transmission loss materials such as glasses.
Depending on minimum transistor sizes, each pixel containing an image sensor of the embodiments disclosed herein could be as small as 1 micron or less in pitch and yet have sufficient sensitivity. This could open the way for contact imaging of very small structures such as biological systems.
The embodiments, which include a plurality of embodiments of an image sensor, preferably a CMOS image sensor, as well as methods for fabrication thereof, will be described in further detail within the context of the following description. The description is further understood within the context of the drawings described above. The drawings are for illustrative purposes and as such are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Within the photoactive region R1, the series of isolation regions separates a series of photosensor regions (i.e., the dual photodiodes shown in
Within both the photoactive region R1 and the circuitry region R2, the series of isolation regions 12 may comprise materials, have dimensions and be formed using methods that are otherwise conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art.
The series of isolation regions may comprise isolation regions including but not limited to local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS) isolation regions, shallow trench isolation regions (i.e., having a depth up to about 5000 angstroms) and deep trench isolation regions (i.e., having a depth up to about 60000 angstroms). Typically, the first embodiment uses shallow trench isolation regions that are located within shallow isolation trenches. The isolation regions (whether located within shallow isolation trenches or deep isolation trenches) may comprise any of several dielectric materials. Typically included are oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon, as well as laminates thereof and composites thereof. Oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of other elements are not excluded.
The series of isolation regions could be formed at least in part using a blanket layer deposition and planarizing method. Appropriate blanket layers may be formed using thermal or plasma oxidation or nitridation methods, chemical vapor deposition methods and physical vapor deposition methods. Planarization methods may include, but are not limited to mechanical planarizing methods, and chemical mechanical polish (CMP) planarizing methods. Chemical mechanical polish planarizing methods are most common.
Within the photoactive region R1, each of the series of photosensor regions may comprise photosensors that are otherwise generally conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Each of the photosensors typically comprises a photodiode, although the invention is not limited to a photosensor region as only a photodiode. The photodiodes could be doped to a concentration from about 1e(E)16 to about 1e(E)18 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter, while using an appropriate dopant.
Within the circuitry region R2, each of the pair of field effect transistors T1 and T2 could comprise a gate dielectric layer located upon the semiconductor substrate. A gate electrode could be located upon the gate dielectric layer. Spacer layers could be located adjoining the sidewalls of the gate dielectric layer and the gate electrode. Finally, each of the first transistor T1 and the second transistor T2 could comprise a pair of source/drain regions separated by a channel region located beneath the gate electrode.
Each of the foregoing layers and structures that comprise that first transistor T1 and the second transistor T2 may comprise materials and have dimensions that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Each of the foregoing layers and structures that comprise the first transistor T1 and the second transistor T2 may also be formed using methods that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art.
The gate dielectric layers may comprise any of several gate dielectric materials. Included but not limiting are generally lower dielectric constant gate dielectric materials such as but not limited to oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon having a dielectric constant from about 4 to about 20, measured in vacuum. Also included, and also not limiting, are generally higher dielectric constant gate dielectric materials having a dielectric constant from about 20 to at least about 100. These higher dielectric constant dielectric materials may include, but are not limited to hafnium oxides, hafnium silicates, titanium oxides, barium-strontium titanates (BSTs) and lead-zirconate titanates (PZTs).
The foregoing gate dielectric materials may be formed using methods appropriate to their materials of composition. Non-limiting examples of methods include thermal or plasma oxidation or nitridation methods, chemical vapor deposition methods (including atomic layer chemical vapor deposition methods) and physical vapor deposition methods. Typically, the gate dielectric layers could comprise a thermal silicon oxide gate dielectric material having a thickness from about 20 to about 70 angstroms.
The gate electrodes may similarly also comprise any of several gate electrode conductor materials. Non-limiting examples include certain metals, metal alloys, metal silicides and metal nitrides, as well as doped polysilicon materials (i.e., having a dopant concentration from about 1e18 to about 1e22 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter) and polycide (i.e., doped polysilicon/metal silicide stack) materials. The gate electrode materials may be deposited using any of several methods. Non-limiting examples include chemical vapor deposition methods (also including atomic layer chemical vapor deposition methods) and physical vapor deposition methods. Typically, each of the gate electrodes 18 comprises a doped polysilicon material having a thickness from about 1000 to about 1500 angstroms.
The spacer layers could be typically formed of a dielectric spacer material or a laminate of dielectric spacer materials, although spacer layers formed of conductor materials are also known. Oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon are commonly used as dielectric spacer materials. Oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of other elements are not excluded. The dielectric spacer materials may be deposited using methods analogous, equivalent or identical to the methods used for forming the gate dielectric layers. Typically, the spacer layers could be formed using a blanket layer deposition and etchback method that provides the spacer layers with the characteristic inward pointed shape.
The source/drain regions could be formed using a two-step ion implantation method. The source/drain regions could be implanted at a polarity appropriate to a field effect transistor within which they are formed. The two step ion implantation method uses the gate electrode, with and without the spacer layers, as a mask. Typical concentrations of dopants within the source/drain regions could be from about 1c(E)15 to about 1c(E)22 dopant atoms per cubic centimeter.
The blanket etch stop layer may comprise etch stop materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Non-limiting examples also include oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon. Oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of other elements are also not excluded. A particular composition of the etch stop layer could be selected in accordance with a composition of materials located and formed thereover. Thus in light of further disclosure below, the blanket etch stop layer could comprise a nitride etch stop material, although the invention is not so limited. The blanket etch stop layer may be formed using any of several methods. Non-limiting examples include chemical vapor deposition or physical vapor deposition methods. Typically, the blanket etch stop layer comprises a silicon nitride material that has a thickness from about 100 to about 300 angstroms.
The individual metallization interconnection studs and metallization interconnection layers CA, M1, V1, M2, V2, M3, V3 and M4 that could be used within the interconnected metallization layers may comprise any of several metallization materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Non-limiting examples include certain metals, metal alloys, metal nitrides and metal silicides. Most common are aluminum metallization materials and copper metallization materials, either of which often includes a barrier metallization material, as discussed in greater detail below. Types of metallization materials may differ as a function of size and location within a semiconductor structure. Smaller and lower-lying metallization features typically comprise copper containing conductor materials. Larger and upper-lying metallization features typically comprise aluminum containing conductor materials.
The series of dielectric passivation layers the stack may also comprise any of several dielectric materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art. Included are generally higher dielectric constant dielectric materials having a dielectric constant from 4 to about 20. Non-limiting examples that are included within this group are oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides of silicon. The series of dielectric layers may also comprise generally lower dielectric constant dielectric materials having a dielectric constant from about 2 to about 4. Included but not limiting within this group are hydrogels, aerogels, silsesquioxane spin-on-glass dielectric materials, fluorinated glass materials and organic polymer materials.
The dielectric and metallization stack layer could comprise interconnected metallization layers and discrete metallization layers M1, M2 and M3 comprising at least one of copper metallization materials and aluminum metallization materials. The dielectric and metallization stack layer may also comprise dielectric passivation layers that also comprise at least one of the generally lower dielectric constant dielectric materials disclosed above. The dielectric and metallization stack layer could have an overall thickness from about 1 to about 4 microns (μm). It may typically comprise from about 2 to about 4 discrete horizontal dielectric and metallization component layers within a stack.
The patterned dielectric and metallization stack layer may be patterned from the dielectric and metallization stack layer while using methods and materials that are conventional in the semiconductor fabrication art, and appropriate to the materials from which are formed the series of dielectric passivation layers. The dielectric and metallization stack layer may be patterned using wet chemical etch methods, dry plasma etch methods or aggregate methods thereof. Dry plasma etch methods are generally preferred insofar as they provide enhanced sidewall profile control when forming the series of patterned dielectric and metallization stack layer. As is illustrated in
Dielectric materials within the series of patterned dielectric and metallization stack layer typically have dielectric constants from about 1.4 to about 1.6 (e.g., when comprised of silicon oxide). Aperture fill materials of high light refraction (n1) could have a dielectric constant from about 1.6 to about 2.1. A silicon nitride dielectric material typically has a dielectric constant from about 2.0 to about 2.1, and could be used for forming the high light refraction material filling apertures, but the embodiment is not so limited.
Optionally, in one embodiment, a planarizing layer could be located upon the reflective layer and/or above filled apertures. The planarizing layer may comprise any of several optically transparent planarizing materials. Non-limiting examples include spin-on-glass planarizing materials and organic polymer planarizing materials. The planarizing layer could have a thickness sufficient to at least planarize the series of apertures A1 and A2, thus providing a planar surface for fabrication of additional structures within the CMOS image sensor.
Optionally, a series of color filter layers could be located upon the patterned on the apertures. The color filter layers would be registered with respect to the photosensor regions. The series of color filter layers could typically include either the primary colors of red, green and blue, or the complementary colors of yellow, cyan and magenta. The series of color filter layers could comprise a series of dyed or pigmented patterned photoresist layers that are intrinsically imaged to form the series of color filter layers. Alternatively, the series of color filter layers may comprise dyed or pigmented organic polymer materials that are otherwise optically transparent, but extrinsically imaged while using an appropriate mask layer. Alternative color filter materials may also be used.
To achieve the good light detection, it is desirable to create a good coupling of light to the photodiode. In one embodiment, this can be achieved by placing a microlens on top of the pixel, or creating a monolithic coupler. No color filter may be used in the embodiments of the image sensor with or without the microlens or optionally, as explained above, color filter could also be used in the embodiments of the sensor with or without the microlens.
The microlens should to be placed at the appropriate height such as the light is preferably focused on top of the light pipe.
The microlenses of the embodiments of the image sensor may comprise any of several optically transparent lens materials that are known in the art. Non-limiting examples include optically transparent inorganic materials, optically transparent organic materials and optically transparent composite materials. Most common could be optically transparent organic materials. The microlens layer could be formed incident to patterning and reflow of an organic polymer material that has a glass transition temperature lower than the series of color filter layers (if present) or the patterned planarizing layer (which is generally present in the embodiments of the image sensors).
The recognition of color and luminance by the embodiments of the image sensors could be done by color reconstruction. Each compound pixel has complete luminance information obtained by combining its two complementary outputs. As a result, the same image sensor can be used either as a full resolution black and white or full color sensor.
The color reconstruction could be done to obtain full color information by the appropriate combination of two adjacent pixels, which could be one embodiment of a compound pixel, either horizontally or vertically. The support over which color information is obtained is less than the dimension of two pixels as opposed to 4 for the Bayer pattern.
Each physical pixel of a device containing an image sensor of the embodiments disclosed herein would have two outputs representing the complementary colors, e.g., cyan, red (C, R) designated as output type 1 or yellow, blue (Y, B) designated as output type 2 as shown in
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, several portions of the subject matter described herein may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), digital signal processors (DSPs), or other integrated formats. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that some aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of skill in the art in light of this disclosure. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms of the subject matter described herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment of the subject matter described herein applies regardless of the particular type of signal bearing medium used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of a signal bearing medium include, but are not limited to, the following: a recordable type medium such as a floppy disk, a hard disk drive, a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Video Disk (DVD), a digital tape, a computer memory, etc.; and a transmission type medium such as a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link, etc.).
Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is common within the art to describe devices and/or processes in the fashion set forth herein, and thereafter use engineering practices to integrate such described devices and/or processes into data processing systems. That is, at least a portion of the devices and/or processes described herein can be integrated into a data processing system via a reasonable amount of experimentation. Those having skill in the art will recognize that a typical data processing system generally includes one or more of a system unit housing, a video display device, a memory such as volatile and non-volatile memory, processors such as microprocessors and digital signal processors, computational entities such as operating systems, drivers, graphical user interfaces, and applications programs, one or more interaction devices, such as a touch pad or screen, and/or control systems including feedback loops and control motors (e.g., feedback for sensing position and/or velocity; control motors for moving and/or adjusting components and/or quantities). A typical data processing system may be implemented utilizing any suitable commercially available components, such as those typically found in data computing/communication and/or network computing/communication systems.
The herein described subject matter sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected,” or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality, and any two components capable of being so associated can also be viewed as being “operably couplable,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality. Specific examples of operably couplable include but are not limited to optical coupling to permit transmission of optical light, for example via an optical pipe or fiber, physically interacting components and/or wirelessly interactable and/or wirelessly interacting components and/or logically interacting and/or logically interactable components.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to inventions containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that virtually any disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.”
All references, including but not limited to patents, patent applications, and non-patent literature are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
This Application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/648,942, filed Dec. 29, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/204,686, filed Sep. 4, 2008, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1918848 | Land | Jul 1933 | A |
3903427 | Pack | Sep 1975 | A |
4017332 | James | Apr 1977 | A |
4292512 | Miller | Sep 1981 | A |
4316048 | Woodall | Feb 1982 | A |
4357415 | Hartman | Nov 1982 | A |
4387265 | Dalal | Jun 1983 | A |
4394571 | Jurisson | Jul 1983 | A |
4400221 | Rahilly | Aug 1983 | A |
4443890 | Eumurian | Apr 1984 | A |
4513168 | Borden | Apr 1985 | A |
4531055 | Shepherd, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4620237 | Traino et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4678772 | Segal et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4827335 | Saito | May 1989 | A |
4846556 | Haneda | Jul 1989 | A |
4857973 | Yang | Aug 1989 | A |
4876586 | Dyck | Oct 1989 | A |
4880613 | Satoh | Nov 1989 | A |
4896941 | Hayashi | Jan 1990 | A |
4950625 | Nakashima | Aug 1990 | A |
4971928 | Fuller | Nov 1990 | A |
4972244 | Buffet | Nov 1990 | A |
4990988 | Lin | Feb 1991 | A |
5071490 | Yokota | Dec 1991 | A |
5081049 | Green | Jan 1992 | A |
5096520 | Faris | Mar 1992 | A |
5124543 | Kawashima | Jun 1992 | A |
5217911 | Denda | Jun 1993 | A |
5247349 | Olego | Sep 1993 | A |
5272518 | Vincent | Dec 1993 | A |
5311047 | Chang | May 1994 | A |
5347147 | Jones | Sep 1994 | A |
5362972 | Yazawa | Nov 1994 | A |
5374841 | Goodwin | Dec 1994 | A |
5391896 | Wanlass | Feb 1995 | A |
5401968 | Cox | Mar 1995 | A |
5449626 | Hezel | Sep 1995 | A |
5468652 | Gee | Nov 1995 | A |
5602661 | Schadt | Feb 1997 | A |
5612780 | Rickenbach | Mar 1997 | A |
5671914 | Kalkhoran et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696863 | Kleinerman | Dec 1997 | A |
5723945 | Schermerhorn | Mar 1998 | A |
5747796 | Heard | May 1998 | A |
5767507 | Unul | Jun 1998 | A |
5798535 | Huang | Aug 1998 | A |
5844290 | Furumiya | Dec 1998 | A |
5853446 | Carre | Dec 1998 | A |
5857053 | Kane | Jan 1999 | A |
5877492 | Fujieda | Mar 1999 | A |
5880495 | Chen | Mar 1999 | A |
5885881 | Ojha | Mar 1999 | A |
5900623 | Tsang | May 1999 | A |
5943463 | Unuma | Aug 1999 | A |
5968528 | Deckner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6013871 | Curtin | Jan 2000 | A |
6033582 | Lee | Mar 2000 | A |
6037243 | Ha | Mar 2000 | A |
6046466 | Ishida | Apr 2000 | A |
6074892 | Bowers | Jun 2000 | A |
6100551 | Lee | Aug 2000 | A |
6270548 | Campbell | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301420 | Greenaway et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326649 | Chang | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6388243 | Berezin | May 2002 | B1 |
6388648 | Clifton | May 2002 | B1 |
6407439 | Hier et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459034 | Muramoto | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463204 | Ati | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6542231 | Garrett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563995 | Kane et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566723 | Vook | May 2003 | B1 |
6680216 | Kwasnick | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6709929 | Zhang | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720594 | Rahn | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6771314 | Bawolek | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6805139 | Savas | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812473 | Amemiya | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6904187 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927145 | Yang | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6960526 | Shah | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967120 | Jang | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969899 | Yaung | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987258 | Mates | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996147 | Majumdar | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7052927 | Fletcher | May 2006 | B1 |
7064372 | Duan | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7105428 | Pan | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106938 | Baek et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109517 | Zaidi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7153720 | Augusto | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163659 | Stasiak | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192533 | Bakkers | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208783 | Palsule | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230286 | Cohen | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235475 | Kamins | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241434 | Anthony | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253017 | Roscheisen | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7254151 | Lieber | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262400 | Yaung | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265328 | Mouli | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272287 | Bise et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285812 | Tang | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7306963 | Linden | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7307327 | Bahl | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311889 | Awano | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326915 | Kaluzhny | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330404 | Peng | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335962 | Mouli | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336860 | Cyr | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7358583 | Reznik | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381966 | Starikov | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388147 | Mulligan | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416911 | Heath et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7446025 | Cohen | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462774 | Roscheisen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471428 | Ohara | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7491269 | Legagneux | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507293 | Li | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521322 | Tang | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524694 | Adkisson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7582857 | Gruev | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598482 | Verhulst | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7622367 | Nuzzo | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7626685 | Jin | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646138 | Williams | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7646943 | Wober | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7647695 | MacNutt | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7649665 | Kempa et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655860 | Parsons | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663202 | Wang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7692860 | Sato et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704806 | Chae | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713779 | Firon | May 2010 | B2 |
7719678 | Kamins | May 2010 | B2 |
7719688 | Kamins | May 2010 | B2 |
7732769 | Snider | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7732839 | Sebe | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7736954 | Hussain | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740824 | Godfried | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7790495 | Assefa | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7888155 | Chen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7902540 | Cohen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7948555 | Kwon et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8030729 | Quitoriano | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8035184 | Dutta | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8049203 | Samuelson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8063450 | Wernersson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067299 | Samuelson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067736 | Gruss | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084728 | Tsang | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8093675 | Tsunemi | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118170 | Sato | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8143658 | Samuelson | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8154127 | Kamins | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8193524 | Bjoerk | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208776 | Tokushima | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212136 | Shirai | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8212138 | Landis | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8222705 | Ogino | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8242353 | Karg | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8269985 | Wober | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8274039 | Wober | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8299472 | Yu et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8330090 | Agarwal | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8384007 | Yu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8455857 | Samuelson | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8471190 | Wober | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8546742 | Wober | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8766272 | Yu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791470 | Wober | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8810808 | Wober | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8835831 | Yu | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020003201 | Yu | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020020846 | Pi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021879 | Lee | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020071468 | Sandstrom | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104821 | Bazylenko | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109082 | Nakayama | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117675 | Mascarenhas | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130311 | Lieber et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020172820 | Majumdar et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003300 | Korgel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006363 | Campbell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030077907 | Kao | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089899 | Lieber | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103744 | Koyama | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030132480 | Chau | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160176 | Vispute | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030189202 | Li | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227090 | Okabe | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040011975 | Nicoli | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021062 | Zaidi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040021602 | Zaidi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040026684 | Empedocles | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058058 | Shchegolikhin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065362 | Watabe | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075464 | Samuelson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095658 | Buretea et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109666 | Kim | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114847 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118337 | Mizutani | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118377 | Bloms | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122328 | Wang | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124366 | Zeng | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155247 | Benthien | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156610 | Charlton et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160522 | Fossum | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040180461 | Yaung | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213307 | Lieber | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217086 | Kawashima | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040223681 | Block | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040241965 | Merritt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252957 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261840 | Schmit | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050009224 | Yang | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035381 | Holm | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082676 | Andry | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087601 | Gerst et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095699 | Miyauchi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109388 | Murakami | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116271 | Kato | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133476 | Islam | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050161662 | Majumdar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164514 | Rauf | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190453 | Dobashi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201704 | Ellwood | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218468 | Owen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050224707 | Guedj | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242409 | Yang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284517 | Shinohara | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011362 | Tao | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038990 | Habib et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060113622 | Adkisson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115230 | Komoguchi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121371 | Wu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146323 | Bratkovski | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060162766 | Gee | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060180197 | Gui | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208320 | Tsuchiya et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060257071 | Bise et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260674 | Tran | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273262 | Sayag | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060273389 | Cohen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284118 | Asmussen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070012980 | Duan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070012985 | Stumbo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023799 | Boettiger | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025504 | Tumer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029545 | Striakhilev | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052050 | Dierickx | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076481 | Tennant | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082255 | Sun | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099292 | Miller | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104441 | Ahn | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107773 | Fork | May 2007 | A1 |
20070108371 | Stevens | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114622 | Adkisson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120254 | Hurkx et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126037 | Ikeda | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137697 | Kempa | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138376 | Naughton | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138380 | Adkisson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138459 | Wong | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139740 | Igura et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140638 | Yang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145512 | Rhodes | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148599 | True | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152248 | Choi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070155025 | Zhang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070164270 | Majumdar | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070170418 | Bowers | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172623 | Kresse | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187787 | Ackerson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196239 | Vink | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200054 | Reznik | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205483 | Williams | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217754 | Sasaki | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228421 | Shioya | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238265 | Kurashina | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238285 | Borden | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241260 | Jaeger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246689 | Ge | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248958 | Jovanovich | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070272828 | Xu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278500 | Lin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285378 | Lankhorst | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290193 | Tucker | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290265 | Augusto | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001498 | Muller | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006319 | Bettge | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029701 | Onozawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080036038 | Hersee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044984 | Hsieh | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047601 | Nag | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047604 | Korevaar | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055451 | Kanbe | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073742 | Adkisson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079022 | Yamamoto | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080079076 | Sheen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083963 | Hsu | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088014 | Adkisson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090401 | Bratkovski | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092938 | Majumdar | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096308 | Santori | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108170 | Adkisson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116537 | Adkisson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128760 | Jun | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080145965 | Reznik | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149914 | Samuelson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149944 | Samuelson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157253 | Starikov | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166883 | Liu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169017 | Korevaar | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169019 | Korevaar | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173615 | Kim | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178924 | Kempa | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188029 | Rhodes | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080191278 | Maekawa | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080191298 | Lin | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211945 | Hong | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218740 | Williams | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224115 | Bakkers | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225140 | Raynor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233280 | Blanchet | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237568 | Kobayashi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246020 | Kawashima | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246123 | Kamins | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248304 | Hanrath | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251780 | Li | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258747 | Kluth | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260225 | Szu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264478 | Ahn | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266556 | Kamins | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266572 | Kamins | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271783 | Murakami | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080277646 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283728 | Inoue | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283883 | Shim | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297281 | Ayazi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311693 | Maxwell | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311712 | Anwar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001498 | Wang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020150 | Atwater | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020687 | Lehmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032687 | Lapstun | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046362 | Guo | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046749 | Mizuuchi | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050204 | Habib | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052029 | Dai et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090057650 | Lieber | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072145 | Peczalski et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104160 | Young | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120498 | Yamazaki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121136 | Gruss et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127442 | Lee | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146198 | Joe | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090151782 | Ko | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152664 | Klem | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153961 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165844 | Dutta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173976 | Augusto | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179225 | Fertig et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179289 | Park | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090188552 | Wang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189144 | Quitoriano | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189145 | Wang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194160 | Chin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090199597 | Danley | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201400 | Zhang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206405 | Doyle | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090223558 | Sun | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224245 | Umezaki | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224349 | Gambino et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230039 | Hoenig et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090233445 | Lee | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242018 | Ahn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243016 | Kawahara | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090244514 | Jin | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260687 | Park | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261438 | Choi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266418 | Hu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266974 | Verhulst | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272423 | Niira | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278998 | El-Ghoroury | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289320 | Cohen | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305454 | Cohen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100006817 | Ohlsson | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019252 | Bratkovski | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019296 | Cha | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019355 | Kamins | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025710 | Yamada | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078055 | Vidu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090341 | Wan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101633 | Park | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100104494 | Meng | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110433 | Nedelcu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116976 | Wober | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126573 | Youtsey | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127153 | Agarwal | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132779 | Hong | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100133986 | Kim | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100136721 | Song | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148221 | Yu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163714 | Wober | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100163941 | Jung | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178018 | Augusto | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186809 | Samuelson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187404 | Klem | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200065 | Choi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207103 | Farrow | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218816 | Guha | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229939 | Shen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100230653 | Chen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100237454 | Fujisawa | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244108 | Kohnke | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244169 | Maeda | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249877 | Naughton | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100258184 | Laughlin | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276572 | Iwabuchi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100277607 | Choi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282314 | Coakley | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295019 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302440 | Wober | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304061 | Ye | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308214 | Wober | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313952 | Coakley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319763 | Park | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320444 | Dutta | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018424 | Takada | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036396 | Jayaraman | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037133 | Su | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049572 | Jeon et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050042 | Choi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057231 | Jeon et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057234 | Jeon et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057286 | Jeon et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080508 | Katsuno | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084212 | Clark | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110127490 | Mi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110133060 | Yu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110133160 | Yui | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110135814 | Miyauchi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110139176 | Cheung | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146771 | Chuang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147870 | Ang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110180894 | Samuelson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110195577 | Kushibiki | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110220191 | Flood | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226937 | Yu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248315 | Nam | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249219 | Evans | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249322 | Wang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253982 | Wang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110272014 | Mathai | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297214 | Kim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309237 | Seo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309240 | Yu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309331 | Yu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315988 | Yu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316106 | Kim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120006390 | Huo et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120009714 | Mouli | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014837 | Fehr et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029328 | Shimizu | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031454 | Fogel | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120060905 | Fogel | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075513 | Chipman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120153124 | Yu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120192939 | Tamboli et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120196383 | Nitkowski et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120196401 | Graham | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120240999 | Yoshida | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120258563 | Ogino | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280345 | Zhu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298843 | Yu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313078 | Fukui | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120318336 | Hekmatshoar-Tabari | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120322164 | Lal | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000704 | Fogel | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130020620 | Wober | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130037100 | Platzer Bjorkman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130112256 | Yu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125965 | Hazeghi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130174904 | Yamasaki | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130220406 | Day | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130341749 | Yu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140045209 | Chou | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140117401 | Herner | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1624925 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1306619 | Mar 2007 | CN |
100350429 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101459185 | Jun 2009 | CN |
100568516 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101675522 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101681941 | Mar 2010 | CN |
0809303 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2923651 | May 2009 | FR |
2348399 | Apr 2000 | GB |
359013708 | Jan 1984 | JP |
59198413708 | Jan 1984 | JP |
2000324396 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002151715 | May 2002 | JP |
2005252210 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005328135 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007134562 | May 2007 | JP |
2007152548 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007184566 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007520877 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007201091 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007317961 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008288585 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009506546 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009236914 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2013513253 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2013513254 | Apr 2013 | JP |
I318418 | May 2004 | TW |
I228782 | Mar 2005 | TW |
200535914 | Nov 2005 | TW |
200536048 | Nov 2005 | TW |
200742115 | Apr 2007 | TW |
200810100 | Feb 2008 | TW |
200814308 | Mar 2008 | TW |
200845402 | Nov 2008 | TW |
200847412 | Dec 2008 | TW |
200915551 | Apr 2009 | TW |
200941716 | Oct 2009 | TW |
201027730 | Jul 2010 | TW |
201034172 | Sep 2010 | TW |
201044610 | Dec 2010 | TW |
201140859 | Nov 2011 | TW |
8603347 | Jun 1986 | WO |
0002379 | Jan 2000 | WO |
03107439 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005064337 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2008069565 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008079076 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008131313 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008135905 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008135905 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008143727 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009099841 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009116018 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009137241 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010019887 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010039631 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011074457 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kalkofen et al., Atomic layer deposition of boron oxide as dopant source for shallow doping of silicon, Meeting Abstract 943, 217th ECS Meeting, 2010, available at http://ma.ecsdl.org/content/MA2010-01/17/943.full.pdf. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,635, mailed Jun. 6, 2013, 24 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,535, mailed Jun. 14, 2013, 22 pages. |
International Preliminary Search Report on Patentability of PCT/US201-057325, mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,573, dated Aug. 6, 2013, 13 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514, dated Aug. 15, 2013, 17 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313, dated Aug. 1, 2013, 20 pages. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,661, notification date Nov. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,582, dated Jun. 28, 2012. |
Taiwanese Office Action of Taiwan Patent Application No. 099116881, issued Jul. 18, 2013 (8 pages). |
Canadian Office Action of Canadian Application No. 3,676,376, dated Oct. 11, 2013. |
Catrysse, et al., An Integrated Color Pixel in 0.18pm CMOS Technology, Proceedings IEDM 2001, pp. 559-562. |
Choi et al., Optimization of sidewall roughness in silica waveguides to reduce propagation losses, May 2001, Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2001. CLEO '01. Technical Digest. Summaries of papers presented at the Conference on, pp. 175-176. |
Geyer et al., Model for the Mass Transport during Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching with Contiguous Metal Films as Catalysts, J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 13446-13451. |
Hopkins, Addressing sidewall roughness using dry etching silicon and Si02, Jul. 1, 2004, ElectroIQ, vol. 47, Issue 7. |
Mei-Ling Kuo et al. “Realization of a near-perfect antireflection coating for silicon solar energy utilization” (Nov. 1, 2008, vol. 33, No. 21, Optics Letters). |
Mukhopadhyay, When PDMS Isn't the Best, American Chemical Society, May 1, 2007. |
Seo, et. al., “Multicolored vertical silicon nanowires,” Nano Letters, vol. 11 issue 4, pp. 1851-1856, 2010. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514, mailed Mar. 19, 2013, 50 pages. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,661, mailed Mar. 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 3, 2014 in Chinese Application No. 200980142671.9. |
Office Action issued on Jan. 28, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 100146327. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 17, 2014 in Korean Application No. 10-2013-7018243. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,664, mailed Feb. 26, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514, mailed Feb. 25, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/021,672 mailed May 9, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,492 mailed May 13, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,851 mailed May 29, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,269 mailed Jun. 11, 2014. |
Office Action issued on Jun. 19, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 099133891. |
Office Action issued on Oct. 29, 2014 in Korean Application No. 10-2013-7020107. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,429 mailed Nov. 4, 2014. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability issued on Oct. 14, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,535. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/543,307 mailed Dec. 24, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,448 mailed Dec. 5, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/056558 mailed Dec. 12, 2014. |
Office Action issued on Nov. 11, 2014 in Taiwanese Application No. 098129911. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/050544 mailed Jan. 9, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Dec. 1, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,664. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514 mailed Sep. 23, 2014. |
Berstein et al., “Modern Physics”, Chapter 14, Section 6, pp. 420-421, 2000, Prentice-Hall, Inc. |
University of California San Diego, Class ECE 183 Lab 1, 2013. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313 mailed Aug. 1, 2014. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,207 mailed Oct. 9, 2014. |
Adler, Nanowire Lawns Make for Sheets of Image Sensors, NewScientist.com, Jul. 28, 2008. |
Babinec et al., High-Flux, Low-Power Diamond Nanowire Single-Photon Source Arrays: An Enabling Material for Optical and Quantum Computing and Cryptography, obtained on Jul. 22, 2010 at URL: http://otd.harvard.edu/technologies/tech.php?case=3702. |
Baillie et al., ‘Zero-space microlenses for CMOS image sensors: optical modeling and lithographic process development’, Publication Date May 2004, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004SPIE.5377.953B, pp. 1-2. |
Baomin Wang and Paul W. Leu, Nanotechology 23 (2012) 194003, 7 pages. |
Barclay et al., Chip-Based Microcavities Coupled to NV Centers in Single Crystal Diamond, Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 12, 2009, vol. 95, Issue 19. |
Brouri et al., Photon Antibunching in the Flurescence of Individual Colored Centers in Diamond, Optics Letters, Sep. 1, 2000, vol. 25, Issue 17. |
Chung, Sung-Wook et al. Silicon Nanovvire Devices. Applied Physics Letters, vol., 76, No. 15 (Apr. 10, 2000), pp. 2068-2070. |
CMOS image sensor pixel microlens array optimization using FDTD Solutions, http://www.lumerical—com/ fdtd—microlens/cmos—image—sensor—pixel—microlens.php, pp. 1-2, Jun. 25, 2008. |
CMOS image sensor pixel optical efficiency and optical crosstalk optimization using FDTD Solutions www.lumerical.com/fdtd—microlens/cmos—image—sensor—pixel—microlens.php, Mar. 19, 2009. |
Deptuch et al., Vertically Integrated Circuits at Fermilab, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Aug. 2010, vol. 54, Issue 4, pp. 2178-2186. |
Ekroll, On the Nature of Simultaneous Color Contrast, Dissertation, University of Kiel, 2005. |
Fan et al., Large-Scale, Heterogeneous Integration of Nanowire Arrays for Image Sensor Circuitry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the United States of America, Aug. 12, 2008, vol. 105, No. 32. |
Fang et al., Fabrication of Slantingly-Aligned Silicon Nanowire Arrays for Solar Cell Applications, Nanotechnology, 2008, Vol, 19, No. 25. |
Furumiya, et al, ‘High-sensitivity and no-crosstalk pixel technology for embedded CMOS image sensor’; IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 48, No. 10, Oct. 2001. |
Gadelrab et al., The Source-Gated Amorphous Silicon Photo-Transistor, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Oct. 1997, vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1789-1794. |
Gambino et al., ‘CMOS Imager with Copper Wiring and Lightpipe,’ Electron Devices Meeting, 2006. IEDM '06, International Publication Date: Dec. 11-13, 2006, pp. 1-4. |
Garnett et al., Light Trapping in Silicon Nanowire Solar Cells, Nanoletters, Jan. 28, 2010, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1082-1087. |
Ge et al., Orientation-Controlled Growth of Single-Crystal Silicon-Nanowire Arrays, Advanced Materials, Jan. 18, 2005, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 56-61. |
Guillaumée, et al., Polarization Sensitive Silicon Photodiodes Using Nanostructured Metallic Grids, Applied Physics Letters 94, 2009. |
Hanrath et al., Nucleation and Growth of Germanium Nanowires Seeded by Organic Monolayer-Coated Gold Nanocrystals, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Feb. 20, 2002, vol. 124, No. 7, pp. 1424-1429. |
Hanrath et al., Supercritical Fluid-Liquid-Solid (SFLS) Synthesis of Si and Ge Nanowires Seeded by Colloidal Metal Nanocrystals, Advanced Materials, Mar. 4, 2003, vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 437-440. |
Hochbaum et al., Controlled Growth of Si Nanowire Arrays for Device Integration, Nano Letters, Mar. 2005, vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 457-460. |
Holmes et al., Control of Thickness and Orientation of Solution-Grown Silicon Nanowires, Science, Feb. 25, 2000, vol. 287, No. 5457, pp. 1471-1473. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US 2010-059468, mailed Jun. 21, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2010/059491, mailed Jun. 21, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2010/059496, mailed Jun. 21, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2010/059504, mailed Jun. 21, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/035722, mailed Nov. 3, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/055963, mailed Mar. 17, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/035722, mailed Jul. 20, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/035726, mailed Jul. 21, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/057227, mailed Jan. 26, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/055963, mailed Oct. 15, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/063592, mailed Jan. 13, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/035727, mailed Sep. 27, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051435, mailed Dec. 3, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051446, mailed Jan. 3, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059468, mailed Feb. 11, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059491, mailed Feb. 9, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059501, mailed Feb. 15, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/059504, mailed Apr. 7, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/060348, mailed Mar. 9, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/064635, mailed Apr. 13, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/066097, mailed Mar. 12, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/067712, mailed May 3, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2011/57325, mailed Jun. 22, 2012. |
Jin-Kon Kim; ‘New Functional Nanomaterials Based on Block Copolymers’ http://www.ziu.edu.cn/adver/subjectizyhd/jz0707061313.html, Jul. 7, 2011. |
Juan et al., High Aspect Ratio Polymide Etching Using an Oxygen Plasma Generated by Electron Cyclotron Resonance Source, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Jan./Feb. 1994, vol. 12, No. 1., pp. 422-426. |
Junger, et. al., Polarization- and wavelength-sensitive sub-wavelength structures fabricated in the metal layers of deep submicron CMOS processes, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7712, 2010. |
Kane, Why Nanowires Make Great Photodetectors, EurekAlert.com article, Apr. 25, 2007. |
Kempa, Thomas J. et al. Single and Tandem Axial p-i-n. Nanowire Photovoltaic Devices. Nano Letters. 2008, vol. 8, No. 10, 3456-3460. |
Kim et al., Electronic Structure of Vertically Aligned Mn-Doped CoFe2O4 Nanowires and Their Application as Humidity Sensors and Photodetectors, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Apr. 7, 2009. |
Law, et al., ‘Semiconductor Nanowires and Nanotubes’; Annu, Rev. Mater. Res. 2004, 34:83-122. |
Lee et al., Vertical Pillar-Superlattice Array and Graphene Hybrid Light Emitting Diodes, Nano Letters, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 2783-2788. |
Lin et al., Fabrication of Nanowire Anisotropic Conductive Film for Ultra-fine Pitch Flip Chip Interconnection, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Jun. 20, 2005, 55th Proceedings, pp. 66-70. |
Lin et al., Reducing Dark Current in a High-Speed Si-Based Interdigitated Trench-Electrode MSM Photodetector, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, May 2003, vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1306-1313. |
Loncar et al., Diamond Nanotechnology, SPIE Newsroom, May 18, 2010, obtained at url: http://spie.org/x40194,xml?ArticleID=x40194. |
Loose et al., CMOS Detector Technology, Scientific Detector Workshop, Sicily, 2005, Experimental Astronomy, vol. 19, Issue 1-3, pp. 111-134. |
Lu et al., Growth of Single Crystal Silicon Nanowires in Supercritical Solution from Tethered Gold Particles on a Silicon Substrate, NanoLetters, Jan. 2003, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 93-99. |
Lugstein et al., Ga/Au Alloy Catalyst for Single Crystal Silicon-Nanowire Epitaxy, Applied Physics Letters, Jan. 8, 2007, vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 023109-1-023109-3. |
Madou, Properties and Growth of Silicon, Including Crystalline Silicon, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, 2002, pp. 125-204. |
Makarova et al., Fabrication of High Density, High-Aspect-Ratio Polyimide Nanofilters, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Nov./Dec. 2009, vol. 27, No. 6., pp. 2585-2587. |
Morales et al., A Laser Ablation Method for the Synthesis of Crystalline Semiconductor Nanowires, Science, Jan. 9, 1998, vol. 279, pp. 208-211. |
N. L. Dmitruk, et al.; ‘Modeling and Measurement of Optical Response of 1D Array of Metallic Nanowires for Sensing and Detection Application’; 26th International Conference on Microelectronics (MIEL 2008), Nis, Serbia, May 11-14, 2008. |
Nguyen et al., Deep Reactive Ion etching of Polyimide for Microfluidic Applications, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Sep. 2007, vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 984-988. |
Ozgur Yavuzcetin, et al.; ‘Index-tuned Anti-reflective Coating using a Nanostructured Metamaterial’; http://www.umass.edu/research/rld/bioportal/vuewtech.php?tid=40, Feb. 28, 2007. |
Pain et al., A Back-Illuminated Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor, IEEE Workshop on Charge-Coupled Devices and Advanced Image Sensors, Karuizawa, Japan, Jun. 9-11, 2005, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Pasadena California. |
Parraga et al., Color and Luminance Information in Natural Scenes, Journal of Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image, Science and Vision, Jun. 1998, vol. 15, No. 6. |
Reynard Corporation; ‘Anti-Reflection Coatings (AR)’, http://www.reynardcorp.com/coating—anti—reflection.php, undated. |
Rosfjord et al., Nanowire Single-Photon Detector with an Integrated Optical Cavity and Anti-Reflection Coating, Optics Express: The International Electronic Journal of Optics, Jan. 23, 2006, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 527-534. |
Rugani, First All-Nanowire Sensor, Technology Review, Aug. 13, 2008, Published by MIT. |
Rutter, Diamond-Based Nanowire Devices Advance Quantum Science, SEAS Communications, Feb. 14, 2010, obtained at url:http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2010/02/digging-deep-into-diamonds/. |
Sangmoo Jeon, et al., Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2971-2976. |
Sangmoo Jeong et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol, A 30(6), Nov./Dec. 2012. |
Sarkar et. al., Integrated polarization-analyzing CMOS image sensor for detecting incoming light ray direction, Sensors Application Symposium (SAS), Mar. 29, 2012, p. 194-199, 1010 IEEE. |
Schmidt et al,, Realization of a Silicon Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor, Small, Jan. 2006, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 85-88. |
Shimizu et al., Homoepitaxial Growth of Vertical Si Nanowires on Si(100) Substrate using Anodic Aluminum Oxide Template, (abstract only), Materials Research Society, Fall 2007. |
Song et al., Vertically Standing Ge Nanowires on GaAs(110) Substrates, Nanotechnology 19, Feb. 21, 2008. |
T. H. Hsu, et al. ‘Light Guide for Pixel Crosstalk Improvement in Deep Submicron CMOS Image Sensor’; IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 1, Jan. 2004. |
Thelander et al., Nanowire-Based One-Dimensional Electronics, Materials Today, Oct. 2006, vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 28-35. |
Trentler, Timothy J. et al. Solution-Liquid-Solid Growth of Cyrstalline III-V Semiconductors: An Analogy to Vapor Liquid-Solid Growth. vol. 270(5243), Dec. 15, 1995, pp. 1791-1794. |
Tseng, et al. ‘Crosstalk improvement technology applicable to 0.14 μm CMOS image sensor’; IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 13-15, 2004; IEDM Technical Digest, pp. 997-1000. |
Verheijen, Marcel A. et al. Growth Kinetics of Heterostructured GaP-GaAs Nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1353-1359. |
Wagner, R.S. and Ellis, W.C. Vapor-Liquid-Solid Mechanism of Single Crystal Growth. Applied Physics Letters. vol. 4, No. 5 (Mar. 1, 1964), pp. 89-90. |
Wang, Introduction to Nanotechnology—Where Opportunities arise Great Future Being Built from Small Things, Fall 2008. |
William Shockley and H. Queisser, Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar Cells, J. of Appl. Physics, Mar. 1961, 32(3). |
Wong et al., Lateral Nanoconcentrator Nanowire Multijunction Photovoltaic Cells, GCEP Progress report, Apr. 20, 2009, pp. 1-18. |
Ye et al., Fabrication Techniques of High Aspect Ratio Vertical Lightpipes Using a Dielectric Photo Mask, SPIE, Proceedings, Feb. 2010, vol. 7591. |
Zhang et al., Ultrahigh Responsivity Visible and Infrared Detection Using Silicon Nanowire Phototransistors, Nanoletters, May 14, 2010, vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 2117-2120. |
Office Action issued Jul. 9, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 102124069. |
A. Gu et al., “Design and growth of III-V nanowire solar cell arrays on low cost substrates,” Conf. Record, 35rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Honolulu, Jun. 2010, pp. 20-25. |
Office Action issued Jun. 23, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201310284409.6. |
Notice of Allowance issued Jan. 30, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,375. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,269, mailed Jan. 15, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,492 mailed Jan. 16, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514 mailed Mar. 10, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,847 mailed Mar. 12, 2015. |
Office Action issued on Jan. 16, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180054442.9. |
Office Action issued Feb. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,429. |
Bernstein et al., “Modern Physics”, Chapter 14, Section 6, pp. 420-421, 2000 by Prentice Hall, Inc. |
Kosonocky, et al., 160 x 244 Element PtSi Schottky-Barrier IR-CCD Image Sensor, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. Ed-32, No. 8, Aug. 1985. |
Office Action issued Apr. 3, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180051048.X. |
Office Action issued May 22, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 099142971. |
Office Action mailed May 26, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2014 138265. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,864 mailed Jun. 15, 2015. |
Office Action issued on May 5, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201410264248.9. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,207 mailed May 7, 2015. |
Kim, Y.S. et al., “ITO/AU/ITO multilayer thin films for transparent conducting electrode applications”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 254 (2007), pp. 1524-1527. |
Philipp, H.R. et al., “Optical Constants of Silicon in the Region 1 to 10 ev”, Physical Review, vol. 120, No. 1, pp. 37-38. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/543,307 mailed Apr. 17, 2015. |
Office Action issued Mar. 19, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180065814.8. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,131 mailed Apr. 17, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/281,108 mailed Apr. 6, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,812 mailed Apr. 1, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313 mailed Apr. 9, 2015. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 18, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180066970.6. |
Office Action issued May 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,448. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/982,269 mailed May 22, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,812 mailed Jul. 23, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,164 mailed Aug. 14, 2015. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,041. |
Bernstein et al. “Modern Physics”, Chapter 14, Section 6, pp. 420-421, 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc. |
Office Action issued Aug. 12, 2015 in Chinese Application No. 201180054442.9. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2014-094365. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,514 mailed Nov. 2, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,313 mailed Oct. 21, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,847 mailed Sep. 1, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,492 mailed Sep. 9, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/459,398 mailed Sep. 16, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,448 mailed Aug. 26, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,131 mailed Oct. 22, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,429 mailed Sep. 4, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,812 mailed Oct. 28, 2015. |
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 100141376. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 103143553. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 27, 2015 in International Application No. PCT/US2015/038999. |
Office Action issued on Nov. 25, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2015-005091. |
Office Action issued Oct. 22, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 103139449. |
Office Action issued Oct. 16, 2015 in Taiwanese Application No. 103145582. |
Office Action issued Nov. 17, 2015 in Taiwanese Application 103102171. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130020620 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12648942 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13556041 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12204686 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 12648942 | US |