The present disclosure relates to solar cells and methods of manufacture. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a high volume porous silicon process.
In the solar cell industry, known high-efficiency technologies usually use semiconductor-grade mono-crystalline silicon wafers, produced using extensive and costly process steps.
Presently, and into the foreseeable future, the use of costly high-quality bulk mono-crystalline-Silicon (c-Si) will be the cost barrier preventing all competing high-efficiency c-Si technologies from reaching the critical “grid-parity” cost threshold.
Existing technologies rely on a supply of semiconductor-grade substrates fabricated from expensive CZ or FZ mono-crystalline silicon ingots which are processed into substrates using a series of high-precision subtractive processes, such as ingot slicing, mechanical lapping, chemical etching and chemical-mechanical polishing.
The inherent cost of semiconductor-grade silicon substrates may prevent competing c-Si PV technologies from reaching grid-parity costs because of the high degree of silicon cost combined with the extensive substrate preparation steps.
Therefore, it is an object of this disclosure to provide high productivity, low cost-of-ownership manufacturing equipment for the high-volume production of photovoltaic (PV) solar cell devices.
The PV solar cell architecture of the present disclosure may deliver best-of-class efficiency, over 20%, while consuming a small fraction, as little as 15%, of source silicon material, at a much lower cost than that used in the production of present high-efficiency cells.
It is a further object of this disclosure to reduce material processing steps and material cost compared to existing technologies by using gas-phase source silicon.
The present disclosure achieves high efficiency and low cost by using the disclosed process to grow the PV cell substrate from gas-phase source silicon into a substantially finished shape with close to 100% source-material utilization.
The presently disclosed substrate growth process allows the in-situ formation of three-dimensional structured substrates or two-dimensional substrates that may enhance efficiency through formation of highly effective light trapping PN junction structures.
The present disclosure teaches the fabrication of a sacrificial substrate base layer that is compatible with a gas-phase substrate growth process. Porous silicon is used as the sacrificial layer in the present disclosure.
Further, the present disclosure provides equipment to produce a sacrificial porous silicon PV cell-substrate base layer, which may assist in the fabrication of highly cost-effective and efficient mono-crystalline silicon PV solar cells.
The porous silicon process uses electrochemical etching of the bulk silicon surface to produce a controlled thickness of a highly porous silicon layer or a stack of multiple porous silicon layers referred to as the porous silicon layer system. The porosity of the films may be controlled from 20% to 70% volumetric ratio of open porosity to silicon, and the thickness may be controlled from 0.2 μm to over 5 μm.
The electrochemical reaction is similar to processes most often referred to as “anodization” in the metal finishing industry. The basic reaction is shown in
The porous silicon layer system may provide two primary functions: 1) the porous silicon provides a sacrificial base on which the aforementioned gas-phase mono-crystalline silicon-cell substrate is grown, and 2) the porous silicon is removed after the growth of the mono-crystalline silicon-cell substrate, using a highly selective chemical etch process, a controlled mechanical process, or a combination of chemical and mechanical process, which results in the release of the cell substrate from the bulk-silicon wafer from which the porous silicon layer was originally formed.
These and other advantages of the disclosed subject matter, as well as additional novel features, will be apparent from the description provided herein. The intent of this summary is not to be a comprehensive description of the subject matter, but rather to provide a short overview of some of the subject matter's functionality. Other systems, methods, features and advantages here provided will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following FIGURES and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages included within this description, be within the scope of the claims.
The features, nature, and advantages of the disclosed subject matter may become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference numerals indicate like features and wherein:
The following description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made for the purpose of describing the general principles of the present disclosure. The scope of the present disclosure should be determined with reference to the claims. Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are illustrated in the drawings, like numbers being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
The present disclosure presents a PV cell substrate fabrication process flow using porous silicon as a sacrificial layer.
The system may produce porous silicon films with acceptable quality for supporting the manufacturing of PV cells.
At step 62, resist 71 has been stripped away from wafer 10, and wafer 10 has been cleaned. Then a sacrificial layer system 12 of porous silicon has been grown on the frontside of wafer 10.
At step 63, solar cell substrate 14 has been epitaxially deposited onto sacrificial layer system 12. At step 64, substrate 14 has been diced to the correct size (in one embodiment, five inches square), and its backside has been lapped (in one embodiment, to approximately 260 um).
At step 65, sacrificial layer system 12 has been selectively etched, releasing substrate 14 from wafer 10.
The present disclosure is focused on the characterization of films treated with varying levels of porosity and annealing conditions relative to etch rate and compatibility with several etch chemistries.
The present disclosure teaches a porous silicon process system used to develop a high quality porous silicon electro-etching process that can be scaled into high volume PV cell manufacturing and can deliver very high wafer throughputs, on the order of 1,500 to 2,000 substrates per hour.
To accomplish these wafer throughputs, the present disclosure teaches transitioning from the present single-wafer, cylindrical, sealed electrolytic “chamber” configuration to an open-cell, unconfined or suitably confined multi-wafer immersion configuration for the silicon electro-etching process. This transition may enable high-throughput, low cost-of-ownership in-line conveyor style wafer handling and transport.
Because the silicon wafer may have a higher resistance than the surrounding electrolyte, if a conduction path is available that does not pass through the wafer, current may flow through the electrolyte without affecting the wafer. It is thus an object of the present disclosure to eliminate such conduction paths that do not pass through the wafer. A wafer transport pallet that isolates electrochemical conduction paths other than through the silicon wafer may force the electrical field to pass only through the silicon wafer.
Palletized wafer handling may allow a higher rate of wafer throughput than the stationary immersion tank methods of
An embodiment 90 of a pallet according to the present disclosure is shown in
The present disclosure includes a pallet-based wafer transport system, where the electrolytic cell is oriented vertically, with the wafer frontside facing upward and the wafer backside facing downward. The wafer transport pallets may be connected in-line and oriented perpendicular to the vertical electrolytic cell orientation. This may enable simple in-line wafer transport through the immersion electro-etching process system, while providing a compact spacing of electro-etching cells and a non-confined chamber design.
The wafer transport pallet-based electrolytic cell design of the present disclosure may eliminate the reliance on circumferential seals applied directly to the front and back of a silicon wafer. The present disclosure relies on a circumferential seal to the silicon wafer backside combined with the pressure head of the electrolyte that is created by a column of electrolyte above the silicon wafer and pallet. Since the frontside seal is eliminated, electro-etching may span the entire front surface of the wafer, with no exclusion zones from the wafer center to around the wafer edge. Thus, this design may provide full wafer edge bevel wrap-around electro-etching due to the lack of a frontside wafer seal. This is an improvement over prior art electro-etching systems, which may have difficulty etching a wafer all the way to its edge.
Wafer 200 may be inserted into the electrolytic chamber by any suitable mechanism known in the art. For example, a robotic arm could be used to place the wafer in the chamber.
Inside the chamber, the back side of wafer 200 may rest on a circumferential sealing mechanism. As shown in
As shown in
A silicon wafer electro-etching cell in which the silicon wafer has a three dimensional surface topography that forms a cavity or trench pattern may be used in the formation of crystalline silicon PV solar cell substrates. The silicon PV substrate may be formed on a layer of porous silicon using gas-phase deposition of silicon and then released from the fragile structure provided by the porous silicon layer. The porous silicon layer produced by this system is used as a release layer for the gas-phase deposited silicon substrate. The 3D patterned silicon wafer processed through this system is referred to in the FIGURES as a template.
The silicon wafer template is the equivalent of a 3D reverse mold for the fabrication of 3D shaped silicon substrates. This pallet-based non-frontside-sealed electro-etching process cell design also has the advantage that frontside template topography does not interfere with the ability to produce a continuous, high-uniformity porous silicon layer, since there is no direct-contact frontside seal on the template wafer.
The present disclosure includes an open electrolytic cell that applies a differential pressure (top vs. bottom) on a silicon wafer by confining a tall column of electrolyte on the frontside of the wafer and providing an electrolytic contact on the backside of the silicon wafer that applies little or no upward force to the wafer. This ensures a differential pressure load on the wafer, which compresses the seal between the wafer backside and the pallet top-edge.
A non-confined silicon wafer electro-etching cell design may transport silicon wafers on pallets that are transported through a single or a series of electrolytic cells using a continuous conveyor system, or it may simply rely on a lip inside the electrolytic cells to support the wafer and ensure a uniform electric field across the entire wafer.
The present disclosure provides an electro-etching system which consists of conveyorized transport of wafer-holding pallets, in which the pallets form an integral and critical functional component of the electrolytic cell and a means of sealing a silicon wafer solely from the backside of the wafer. This sealing allows the prevention of shadowing, blocking, and exclusion zones on the wafer frontside. The pallets also provide transport from wafer loading to wafer un-loading through the electro-etching system. The pallets are a component of some embodiments of the present disclosure, but they are not a necessary component of all embodiments.
The transition from a single-wafer sealed cylindrical chamber in known systems to the newly presented in-line immersion configuration may result in a significant increase in the electrical field and an improved porous silicon distribution across the surface of the wafer in process.
The pallet and conveyor based in-line immersion porous silicon electro-etching process system embodiment of the present disclosure is designed with several key components and design considerations, which may be varied in order to change the characteristics of the resulting system. Some of these design considerations include the following: electrode shape, size and spacing; electrode segmentation (multi-staged electrodes); electrode material; electrode current density; AC, DC, or pulsed current supply; wafer-to-electrode spacing; wafer configuration (topography, via holes, wafer thickness, wafer doping conditions, and surface treatments); wafer orientation within the wafer processing zone; wafer processing zone shape and size; wafer transport speed through the processing zone; reactant-gas extraction from the wafer in process (avoidance of gas bubbles and the resulting blocked electro-etching); electrolyte concentrations, flow rates, and flow direction; and electrolyte stability.
The foregoing description of embodiments is provided to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the disclosed subject matter. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without the use of the innovative faculty.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4043894 | Gibbs | Aug 1977 | A |
4070206 | Kressel et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4082570 | House et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4165252 | Gibbs | Aug 1979 | A |
4249959 | Jebens | Feb 1981 | A |
4251679 | Zwan | Feb 1981 | A |
4348254 | Lindmayer | Sep 1982 | A |
4361950 | Amick | Dec 1982 | A |
4409423 | Holt | Oct 1983 | A |
4427839 | Hall | Jan 1984 | A |
4461922 | Gay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4479847 | McCaldin et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4626613 | Wenham et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4672023 | Leung | Jun 1987 | A |
4922277 | Carlson | May 1990 | A |
5024953 | Uematsu et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5073230 | Maracas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5112453 | Behr et al. | May 1992 | A |
5208068 | Davis | May 1993 | A |
5248621 | Sano | Sep 1993 | A |
5316593 | Olson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5348618 | Canham et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358600 | Canham et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5397400 | Matsuno et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5458755 | Fujiyama et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459099 | Hsu | Oct 1995 | A |
5494832 | Lehmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5538564 | Kaschmitter | Jul 1996 | A |
5645684 | Keller | Jul 1997 | A |
5660680 | Keller | Aug 1997 | A |
5679233 | Van Anglen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681392 | Swain | Oct 1997 | A |
5689603 | Huth | Nov 1997 | A |
5882988 | Haberern et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928438 | Salami | Jul 1999 | A |
6091021 | Ruby | Jul 2000 | A |
6096229 | Shahid | Aug 2000 | A |
6114046 | Hanoka | Sep 2000 | A |
6127623 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6204443 | Kiso et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6254759 | Rasmussen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6294725 | Hirschberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331208 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6399143 | Sun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416647 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429037 | Wenham et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441297 | Keller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448155 | Iwasaki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461932 | Wang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6517697 | Yamagata | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524880 | Moon et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534336 | Iwane | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555443 | Artmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566235 | Nishida et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602760 | Poortmans et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602767 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613148 | Rasmussen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624009 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645833 | Brendel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649485 | Solanki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653722 | Blalock | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664169 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6756289 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6881644 | Malik et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6946052 | Yanagita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964732 | Solanki | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7014748 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022585 | Solanki et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026237 | Lamb | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7368756 | Bruhns et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7402523 | Nishimura | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20020153039 | Moon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168592 | Vezenov | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179140 | Toyomura | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030017712 | Brendel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039843 | Johnson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030124761 | Baert | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040173790 | Yeo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217005 | Rosenfeld et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259335 | Narayanan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265587 | Koyanagi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050160970 | Niira | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172998 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176164 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177343 | Nagae | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199279 | Yoshimine et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274410 | Yuuki et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281982 | Li | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021565 | Zahler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043495 | Uno | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054212 | Fraas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070884 | Momoi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105492 | Veres et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060196536 | Fujioka | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231031 | Dings et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266916 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283495 | Gibson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070077770 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082499 | Jung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080047601 | Nag et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080157283 | Moslehi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080210294 | Moslehi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080264477 | Moslehi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277885 | Duff et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289684 | Moslehi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295887 | Moslehi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090042320 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090107545 | Moslehi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090301549 | Moslehi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022074 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100116316 | Moslehi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0597428 | May 1994 | EP |
0879902 | Nov 1998 | EP |
06-260670 | Sep 1994 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Alvin D. Compaan, Photovoltaics: Clean Power for the 21st Century, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2170-2180, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Berge, 150-mm Layer Transfer for Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3102-3107, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Oules et al, Silicon on Insulator Structures Obtained by Epitaxial Growth of Silicon over Porous Silicon, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1992, p. 3595, vol. 139, No. 12, Meylan Cedex, France. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Porous Silicon Layer Transfer Processes for Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2004, pp. 101-113, vol. 83, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Self-Standing Porous Silicon Films by One-Step Anodizing, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 2004, pp. C307-C314, vol. 151, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Leuven, Belgium. |
F.Duerinckx, et al, Reorganized Porous Silicon Bragg Reflectors for Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Oct. 2006, vol. 27, No. 10. |
Francois J. Henley, Layer-Transfer Quality Cleave Principles, SiGen, Jul. 8, 2005, pp. 1-6, The Silicon Genesis Corporation, San Jose, California. |
H.J.Kim, et al, Large-Area Thin-Film Free-Standing Monocrystalline Si Solar cells by Layer Transfer, Leuven, Belgium, IEEE. |
J.H.Werner et al, From Polycrystalline to Single Crystalline Silicon on Glass, Thin Solid Films, 2001, pp. 95-100, vol. 383, Issue 1-2, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
J.J. Schermer et al., Epitaxial Lift-Off for large area thin film III/V devices, phys. Stat. sol. (a) 202, No. 4, 501-508 (2005). |
Jianhua Zhao, et al, A 19.8% Efficient Honeycomb Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cell with Improved Light Trapping, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1999, vol. 46, No. 10. |
K. Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., Progress in epitaxial deposition on low-cost substrates for thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells at IMEC, Journal of Crystal Growth, 2006, pp. 438-441, vol. 287, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
K.L. Chopra et al., Thin-Film Solar Cells: An Overview, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, pp. 69-92, vol. 12, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Lammert et al., The Interdigitated Back Contact Solar Cell: A Silicon Solar Cell for Use in Concentrated Sunlight, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, pp. 337-342. |
MacDonald et al., “Design and Fabrication of Highly Topographic Nano-imprint Template for Dual Damascene Full 3-D Imprinting,” Dept. of Chemical Eng., University of Texas at Austin, Oct. 24, 2005. |
Martin A. Green, Consolidation of Thin-Film Photovoltaic Technology: The Coming Decade of Opportunity, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 383-392, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Martin A. Green, Silicon Photovoltaic Modules: A Brief History of the First 50 Years, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2005, pp. 447-455, vol. 13, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Nobuhiko Sato et al, Epitaxial Growth on Porous Si for a New Bond and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator, Journal of Electrochemical Society, Sep. 1995, vol. 142, No. 9, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Hiratsuka, Japan. |
P.J.Verlinden, et al, Sliver® Solar Cells: A New Thin-Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Technology, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3422-3430, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
P.R. Hageman et al., Large Area, Thin Film Epitaxial Lift Off III/V Solar Cells, 25th PVSC, May 13-17, 1996, Washington D.C., IEEE. |
Photovoltaic Technology Research Advisory Council, A Vision for Photovoltaic Technology, 2005, pp. 1-41, European Commision Publications Office. |
Prometheus Institute, U.S. Solar Industry Year in Review: U.S. Solar Energy Industry Charging Ahead, (SEIA) The Solar Energy Industry Association. |
R.Brendel, et al, Sol-Gel Coatings for Light Trapping in Crystalline Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1997, pp. 391-394, vol. 218, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
Richard Auer et al, Simplified Transfer Process for High-Current Thin-Film Crystalline Si Solar Modules, 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, May 11-18, 2003, Osaka, Japan. |
Richard M. Swanson, A Vision for Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 443-453, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Rolf Brendel, A Novel Process for Ultrathin Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells on Glass, 14th European Photovolaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 1997, Barcelona, Spain. |
Rolf Brendel, Review of Layer Transfer Processes for Cystalline Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, The Japan Journal of Applied Physics, 2001, pp. 4431-4439, vol. 40, Part 1, No. 7, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, Japan. |
Rolf Brendel, Thin-Film Crystalline Silicone Mini-Modules Using Porous Si for Layer Transfer, Solar Energy, 2004, pp. 969-982, vol. 77, Elsevier Ltd., Germany. |
S. Hegedus, Thin Film Solar Modules: The Low Cost, High Throughput and Versatile Alternative to Si Wafers, Progress in Photvoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 393-411, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Takao Yonehara, et al, Epitaxial Layer Transfer by Bond and Etch Back of Porous Si, Applied Physics Letter 64, Apr. 18, 1994, vol. 16, American Institute of Physics. |
Toshiki Yagi, et al, Ray-Trace Simulation of Light Trapping in Silicon Solar Cell with Texture Structures, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2647-2656, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110120882 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61145018 | Jan 2009 | US |