Race track configuration and method for wafering silicon solar substrates

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8330126
  • Patent Number
    8,330,126
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 29, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 11, 2012
    11 years ago
Abstract
A system for manufacturing free-standing films from work pieces. The system includes a racetrack structure being configured to transfer at least one work piece and one or more accelerator-based ion implanters coupled to the racetrack structure via an end station. Each of the accelerator-based ion implanters is configured to introduce particles having an energy of greater than 1 MeV to implant into a surface of the work piece loaded in the end station to form a cleave region in the work piece. The system includes one or more cleave modules coupled to the racetrack structure configured to perform a cleave process to release a free-standing film from the work piece along the cleave region. Additionally, the system includes an output port coupled to each cleave module to output the free standing film detached from the work piece and one or more service modules each connected to the racetrack structure.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to technique including a method and a structure for forming substrates. More particularly, the present method and system provides a method and system using an accelerator process for the manufacture of thick free standing semiconductor films for a variety of applications including photovoltaic cells. But it will be recognized that the invention has a wider range of applicability; it can also be applied to other types of applications such as for three-dimensional packaging of integrated semiconductor devices, photonic or optoelectronic devices, piezoelectronic devices, flat panel displays, microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”), nano-technology structures, sensors, actuators, integrated circuits, biological and biomedical devices, and the like.


From the beginning of time, human beings have relied upon the “sun” to derive almost all useful forms of energy. Such energy comes from petroleum, radiant, wood, and various forms of thermal energy. As merely an example, human being have relied heavily upon petroleum sources such as coal and gas for much of their needs. Unfortunately, such petroleum sources have become depleted and have lead to other problems. As a replacement, in part, solar energy has been proposed to reduce our reliance on petroleum sources. As merely an example, solar energy can be derived from “solar cells” commonly made of silicon.


The silicon solar cell generates electrical power when exposed to solar radiation from the sun. The radiation interacts with atoms of the silicon and forms electrons and holes that migrate to p-doped and n-doped regions in the silicon body and create voltage differentials and an electric current between the doped regions. Depending upon the application, solar cells have been integrated with concentrating elements to improve efficiency. As an example, solar radiation accumulates and focuses using concentrating elements that direct such radiation to one or more portions of active photovoltaic materials. Although effective, these solar cells still have many limitations.


As merely an example, solar cells rely upon starting materials such as silicon. Such silicon is often made using either polysilicon (i.e. polycrystalline silicon) and/or single crystal silicon materials. These materials are often difficult to manufacture. Polysilicon cells are often formed by manufacturing polysilicon plates. Although these plates may be formed effectively, they do not possess optimum properties for highly effective solar cells. Single crystal silicon has suitable properties for high grade solar cells. Such single crystal silicon is, however, expensive and is also difficult to use for solar applications in an efficient and cost effective manner. Additionally, both polysilicon and single-crystal silicon materials suffer from material losses during conventional manufacturing called “kerf loss”, where the sawing process eliminates as much as 40% and even up to 60% of the starting material from a cast or grown boule and singulate the material into a wafer form factor. This is a highly inefficient method of preparing thin polysilicon or single-crystal silicon plates for solar cell use.


Generally, thin-film solar cells are less expensive by using less silicon material but their amorphous or polycrystalline structure are less efficient than the more expensive bulk silicon cells made from single-crystal silicon substrates. These and other limitations can be found throughout the present specification and more particularly below.


From the above, it is seen that techniques for forming suitable substrate materials of high quality and low cost are highly desired.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, techniques including a method and a structure for forming substrates are provided. More particularly, the present method and system provides a method and system using an accelerator process and a cleave process for the manufacture of thick free standing semiconductor films for a variety of applications including photovoltaic cells. But it will be recognized that the invention has a wider range of applicability; it can also be applied to other types of applications such as for three-dimensional packaging of integrated semiconductor devices, photonic or optoelectronic devices, piezoelectronic devices, flat panel displays, microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”), nano-technology structures, sensors, actuators, integrated circuits, biological and biomedical devices, and the like.


In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a system for manufacturing free standing films from bulk work pieces. The system includes a racetrack structure being configured to transfer at least one work piece. The system further includes one or more accelerator-based ion implanters coupled to the racetrack structure via an end station. Each of the accelerator-based ion implanters is configured to introduce particles having an energy of greater than 1 MeV to implant into a surface of the work piece loaded in the end station to form a cleave region in the work piece. Additionally, the system includes one or more cleave modules coupled to the racetrack structure. Each of the cleave modules is configured to perform a cleave process to release a free standing film from the work piece along the cleave region. Furthermore, the system includes an output port coupled to the cleave module to output the free standing film that is detached from the work piece and one or more service modules each connected to the racetrack structure.


In another specific embodiment, the present invention provides a method for volume manufacturing free standing thickness of materials from bulk work pieces. The method includes providing a racetrack structure including a first conveyor. The method further includes loading at least a work piece in a tray. The work piece has a surface substantially in a predetermined crystallographic plane. Additionally, the method includes transferring the work piece in the tray to an end station coupled to the racetrack structure via the first conveyor. The method further includes generating an ionic particle beam by an implant subsystem coupled to the racetrack structure. The ionic particle beam is introduced to the surface of the work piece in the end station and implanted to a depth defining a cleave region. Furthermore, the method includes transferring the work piece in the tray via the first conveyor to a cleave module coupled to the racetrack structure. The work piece is treated by one or more thermal-mechanical processes to cleave a free standing thickness of material along the cleave region. Moreover, the method includes releasing the free standing thickness of material having a thickness substantially equal to the depth and transferring the free standing thickness of material out of the cleave module via a second conveyor. In one embodiment, the racetrack structure is a closed looped architecture for transferring the tray holding a remaining portion of the work piece and performing a repeated implant process in the implant subsystem and a next round of cleave process in the cleave module.


Numerous benefits are achieved over pre-existing techniques using embodiments of the present invention. In particular, embodiments of the present invention use a cost effective accelerator system and method for providing a high energy implant process for layer transfer techniques. Such accelerator system may include, but is not limited to, a Drift Tube linear accelerator technique, a Radio Frequency Quadrupole (commonly called RFQ), an electrostatic accelerator technique, or combinations of these, (for example, a RFQ combined with a Drift Tube Linac or a RFI (RF-Focused Interdigital) Linear Accelerator), cyclotron, and other suitable techniques. In a preferred embodiment, the accelerator provides an implantation process that forms a thickness of transferable material defined by a cleave plane in a donor substrate. The thickness of transferable material may be further processed to provide a high quality semiconductor material for application such as photovoltaic devices, 3D MEMS or integrated circuits, IC packaging, semiconductor devices, any combination of these, and others. In a preferred embodiment, the present method provides for single crystal silicon for highly efficient photovoltaic cells among others. In a preferred embodiment, the present method and structure use a low initial dose of energetic particles, which allows the process to be cost effective and efficient. Additionally, the present method and structure allow for fabrication of large area substrates. It will be found that this invention can be applied to make thin silicon material plates of the desired form factor (for example, 50 μm-200 μm thickness with an area size from 15 cm×15 cm to upwards of 1 m×1 m or more for polysilicon plates). In an alternative preferred embodiment, embodiments according to the present invention may provide for a seed layer that can further provide for layering of a hetero-structure epitaxial process. The hetero-structure epitaxial process can be used to form thin multi-junction photovoltaic cells, among others. Merely as an example, GaAs and GaInP layers may be deposited heteroepitaxially onto a germanium seed layer, which is a transferred layer formed using an implant process according to an embodiment of the present invention. In a specific embodiment, the present method can be applied successively to cleaving multiple slices from a single ingot, e.g., silicon boule. That is, the method can be repeated to successively cleave slices (similar to cutting slices of bread from a baked loaf) according to a specific embodiment. Of course, there can be other variations, modifications, and alternatives.


Depending upon the embodiment, one or more of these benefits may be achieved. These and other benefits may be described throughout the present specification and more particularly below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram illustrating a method of processing a film of material in a tool having a race track configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 2 is a simplified top-view diagram of a system and process in a race track configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a simplified top-view diagram of a system employing two race tracks in communication with one another.



FIG. 4 is a simplified top-view diagram of a system employing a runway type architecture.



FIG. 5 is a simplified top-view diagram of a system employing a rotating platen rather than conveyor belts, for movement of trays, bricks, or substrates.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to embodiments of the present invention, techniques including a method for forming substrates are provided. More particularly, embodiments according to the present invention provide a method to form a free standing thickness of material from a semiconductor work piece. In a specific embodiment, the free standing layer of material is provided using a plurality of high energy particles to cause a formation of a cleave plane in the semiconductor substrate. The method according to present invent invention can be used in a variety of application, including but not limited to semiconductor device packaging, photovoltaic cells, MEMS devices, and others.



FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram illustrating a method of processing a film of material in a tool having a racetrack configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention. In a specific embodiment, a method 100 for fabricating free standing thickness of materials from a semiconductor work piece in bulk form is provided as follows:


1. Process 110: Provide a racetrack structure including a first conveyor;


2. Process 115: Load at least a work piece in a tray;


3. Process 120: Transfer the work piece in the tray to an end station coupled to the racetrack structure via the first conveyor;


4. Process 125: Generate an ionic particle beam by an implant subsystem coupled to the racetrack structure;


5. Process 130: Introduce the ionic particle beam to implant surface of the work piece and rest at a depth defining a cleave region;


6. Process 135: Transfer the work piece in the tray via the first conveyor to a cleave module coupled to the racetrack structure;


7. Process 140: Perform one or more thermal-mechanical processes to cleave a free-standing thickness of material;


8. Process 145: Release the free standing thickness of material having a thickness substantially equal to the depth;


9. Process 150: Transfer the free standing thickness of material;


10. Process 155: Perform other steps as desired.


The above sequence of steps provide a method of forming substrates using an implantation process and a cleave process according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown, the method 100 includes using an accelerator based high energy implant process and a controlled cleave process to remove a film of material, which is preferably thick and free standing using a system configured in a race track manner. Other alternatives can also be provided where steps may be added, one or more steps may be removed, or one or more steps may be provided in a different sequence without departing from the scope of the claims herein. Further details of the present method can be found throughout the present specific and more particularly below.


Briefly, the method 100 includes at least two major processes. The first major process is implantation process including at least the Processes 120 and 125, in which the surface of the work piece is exposed to an energetic particle beam. For example, the work piece is an ingot or boule of crystalline silicon with a surface prepared to be substantially within a specific crystallographic plane, e.g., an (111) or (110) plane with a miscut angle in a few degrees. The energetic particle beam can be a beam of light ions such as hydrogen which are accelerated to high energy of greater than 1 MeV via a corresponding high current high energy accelerator. The beam of ions then is directed and tuned to have a desired spot size and controllable scanning scheme via a magnetic beam scanner. As the beam of ions is introduced to the surface of the work piece, the ions come to rest in a thin layer at a well-defined depth below the surface of the work piece, defining a cleave region or cleave layer thereof. This cleave region or layer establishes a plane along which a mechanical facture will preferentially propagate. Details about techniques using accelerator based ion implantation and examples of the implant tools thereof can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/936,582, U.S. Patent Application No. 60/997,684, and U.S. Patent Application No. 60/992,086, commonly assigned to Silicon Genesis Corporation of San Jose, Calif., and hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. In one embodiment, the implantation process is performed within an implant subsystem coupled to a racetrack structure which is scalable and modular for coupling with other process or service modules. For example, a racetrack structure will be described in more detail in FIG. 2 below.


A second major process of the method 100 is the actual cleaving of the work piece or processing to cause a facture propagation to form a free standing thickness of material. This process, including at least Processes 140 through 150, is usually performed within a cleave module coupled to the racetrack structure and separated from the end station for implantation process. In particular, this process includes one or more thermal-mechanical treatments of the work piece which has been pre-implanted by the high energy ion beam with a well-defined cleave region. In one implementation, at least a localized initiation region at a defined depth has been formed beneath the surface of the work piece by implanting a beam of ions to a portion of the surface. The one or more thermal-mechanical treatments can be performed, at least starting from the initiation region, to initiate a facture locally. Further, the thermal-mechanical process is to cause the facture to subsequently propagate along the cleave region or layer, which is preferably close to a pre-defined crystallographic plane (such as (111) plane) due to a smaller cost of energy. Finally, the process results in separating a thin upper layer of the work piece from the remainder of the work piece. The thin upper layer is a monolithic, free standing thickness of material with a thickness substantially equal to the depth of the cleave layer. Through one or more extra steps, the free standing thickness of material can be released and transferred out of the cleave module via an output port. The released free standing thickness of material can be called a wafer that self-supporting and can be used as a wafer substrates for many applications including solar cells. Details about techniques of controlled cleaving a free standing thickness of materials and associated examples of the cleaving process tools can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,563 and U.S. Patent Application No. 61/051,344, U.S. Patent Application No. 61/051,307, commonly assigned to Silicon Genesis Corporation of San Jose, Calif., and hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. Of course, there can be other variations, alternatives, and modifications.


In a specific embodiment, the present method can perform other processes. For example, the method can place the thickness of detached material on a support member, which is later processed. Additionally or optionally, the method performs one or more processes on the semiconductor substrate before subjecting the surface region with the first plurality of high energy particles. Depending upon the embodiment, the processes can be for the formation of photovoltaic cells, integrated circuits, optical devices, any combination of these, and the like. Of course, there can be other variations, modifications, and alternatives.



FIG. 2 is a simplified top-view diagram of a system and process in a racetrack configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an example, which should not unduly limit the scope of the claims herein. As shown, a factory volume manufacture system is provided and configured in a racetrack structure 1000. The racetrack structure 1000 is illustrated specifically as a closed loop architecture. Of course, other forms such as linear single runway or multiple parallel runways architectures can be applicable. The racetrack structure inherently includes a track route and a factory conveyor can be built along with. A sample tray 1100 then is able to be installed onto the track route and transferable via this conveyor from one location to another. For example, the arrows within the track route illustrate the directions of the tray 1100 being transferred.


In one embodiment, a tray service module 1200 can be coupled to the racetrack structure 1000. The tray module 1200 can be used for stationing the sample tray 1100, where one or more work pieces can be loaded. In an implementation, the sample tray 1100 is designed to be able to carry multiple work pieces for maximizing the manufacture throughput. For example, the tray 1100 can have 6×6 pallets each seated a 156×156 mm ingots or can have 8×8 pallets each seated a 125×125 mm ingots. Each ingots can have a total height up to 100 mm. In one implementation, the throughput of each implant/cleave process pair is expected to range from 185 to 300 wafers per hour depending on wafer form factors. In an embodiment, more than one tray can be installed for increasing the production.


In another embodiment, the factory volume manufacture system includes one or more implant subsystems. Each of the implant subsystem includes an accelerator-based ion implanter (e.g. 1001) and an end station (e.g. 1011). The tray 1100 can be loaded into the end station 1011, which is a vacuum chamber and coupled to the accelerator 1001 for performing an implantation process to at least one work piece in the tray 1100.


The accelerator-based ion implanter 1001 is characterized as a high current, high energy ion beam accelerator and designed to produce a mono-energetic beam of protons or other light ions at energy greater than 1 MeV. In one example, a RFQ-based or RFI-based linear accelerator is used. In another example, a cyclotron accelerator is applied. In yet another example, an electrostatic accelerator can be used. Ion implant apparatuses useful for embodiments of the present invention have been made recently available by the use of DC electrostatic particle accelerators such as the DYNAMITRON proton accelerator available from Ion Beam Applications SA, Belgium). Other forms of DC electrostatic accelerators which may be used include Van de Graaff or Tandem Van de Graaff accelerator types.


The proton beam generated by the accelerator 1001 is directed into the end station 1011 and tuned with a proper spot diameter and dose control. Within the end station 1011, the surfaces of the work pieces in the tray 1100 is exposed to the proton beam which can be scanned and pulsed to provide proper dosage across the surface area. The energetic ions then are implanted into the surface of each work piece and rest at a well-defined depth depending on the energy level of the beam, causing a formation of a stressed defective structure within a thin layer called a cleave region or cleave layer. In one implementation, there can be some additional implant subsystems being coupled to the racetrack structure 1000. For example, another implant subsystem includes an accelerator 1002 (or 1003, or 100N) and an end station 1012 (or 1013, or 101N) accordingly for performing similar implantation process to a separate tray holding at least one work piece.


Referring to FIG. 2 again, the racetrack structure 1000 also is configured to couple with several process or service modules along the track route. For example, one or more cleave module 1211, 1212, or 121N are directly coupled to the racetrack structure 1000. After the implantation process is performed within one of implant subsystems (described in last paragraph), the tray 1100 can be transferred via the conveyor into the cleave module 1211. The cleave module 1211 includes tools for performing one or more thermal-mechanical treatments to the work pieces in the tray 1100. In particular, the thermal-mechanical treatments are applied and controlled to cause an initiation of mechanical fracture of the work piece near the cleave region and a subsequent controlled propagation along the cleave region. In one embodiment, the thermal-mechanical treatments cause a cleave process or a controlled facture propagation of a thin upper layer of a bulk work piece. The cleave process would lead to a formation and detachment of a complete free standing thickness of material or a free standing film or simply a thin wafer out of each work piece in the tray. In another embodiment, the number of the cleave modules associated with the racetrack structure 1000 can be increased, e.g., by adding redundant cleave modules 1212 through 121N, for achieving a balanced line production with a proper ratio over the number of installed implant subsystems within the same racetrack structure 1000.


Of course, there can be other alternatives, variations, and modifications for the system in the racetrack configuration. For example, the racetrack structure 1000 can be designed to couple with an annealing station 1201 where the work pieces in the tray 1100 can be thermally treated before loaded into the cleave module 1211. In another example, the racetrack structure 1000 can include an optional module 1221 for performing any necessary steps after the formation of the free standing thickness of material. In certain embodiments, each cleave module, e.g., 1211 or 1212, may include an output port 1311 or 1312 for transferring the free standing thickness of material after its detachment. The free standing thickness of material can be firstly inspected, and then boxed, or directly placed on a second conveyor 1300 associated with the racetrack structure 1000. In a specific embodiment, the racetrack structure may also include a quality control (QC) module 1231 for performing quality inspection for a remaining portion of each work piece in the tray 1100 after removing a free standing thickness of material thereof. The QC module 1231 may also be able to performing necessary work piece re-preparation including surface smoothening process to make each work piece ready for a repeated implant/cleave process. In particular, the tray 1100 carrying the work pieces can be transferred again into one of end stations 1011 through 101N for next round of implantation process. The details of a method for manufacturing a film of material subsequently in a tool having a racetrack configuration can be seen in FIG. 1 described above.


Alternative embodiments fall within the scope of the present invention. For example, FIG. 3 shows a simplified schematic diagram of an embodiment utilizing a race track having more than one loop. A first loop 300 of the racetrack is utilized to receive and circulate trays bearing work pieces between implant stations and cleave stations. Following cleaving, wafers are output to a conveyor.


A second loop 302 of the race track is used to refill trays with bricks, once successive implantation and cleaving steps have reduced the amount of material present in an existing brick. The second race track is also in communication with various stations, such as a load lock, a brick inspection node, a brick grinding node, and a brick stocking point.


While the embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3 show a closed-loop architecture, this is not required. According to alternative embodiments, a single runway architecture may be employed.



FIG. 4 shows one such alternative embodiment utilizing a runway configuration. In this embodiment, a single, linear conveyor 400 transports work pieces 402 (which may be supported on trays), for exposure to implantation in the end-station of one or more linear accelerators. The conveyor also is in communication with various other nodes, for example cleave modules or service modules that may be used for analysis or processing of wafers/substrates or the bricks.


Following cleaving, a robot 404 may be employed to transport bricks from regions near the end of the conveyor to the beginning of the conveyor. This transport would allow for implantation of the bricks in order to cleave additional material. In certain embodiments, the robot may be a track robot (shown) or may be an Automated Guide Vehicle (AGV).


And while the previous embodiments show systems having one or more conveyor structures, this is not required by the present invention. Alternative embodiments could use structures other than conveyors for movement of the trays/bricks/substrates. One example of alternative ways of moving these elements could utilize track-based robots. Another example of alternative ways of moving these elements could utilize AGVs.


Still another example of an alternative embodiment employs a rotating lazy susan-type structure to accomplish movement. As shown in the embodiment of FIG. 5, a circular platform 500 is configured to rotate to allow bricks/trays present thereon, to be in communication with different implantation stations or analysis processing nodes. The circular platform is also in communication with input and output nodes allowing successive loading and unloading of trays/bricks/cleaved substrates.


The following nonprovisional patent applications are incorporated by reference in their entireties herein for all purposes: U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 11/782,289, and U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 11/784,524.


While the above is a full description of the specific embodiments, various modifications, alternative constructions and equivalents may be used. Although the above has been described using a selected sequence of steps, any combination of any elements of steps described as well as others may be used. Additionally, certain steps may be combined and/or eliminated depending upon the embodiment. Furthermore, the particles of hydrogen can be replaced using co-implantation of helium and hydrogen ions to allow for formation of the cleave plane with a modified dose and/or cleaving properties according to alternative embodiments. In other embodiments, the work piece can be one or more silicon boules and/or waters, and the like. In other embodiments, the work piece can be configured with a slight miscut or be spatially angled with or without miscuts. Of course there can be other variations, modifications, and alternatives. Therefore, the above description and illustrations should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention which is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for manufacturing free-standing films from bulk work pieces,the system comprising: a racetrack structure being configured to transfer at least one work piece;one or more accelerator-based ion implanters coupled to the racetrack structure via an end station, each of the accelerator-based ion implanters being configured to introduce particles to implant into a surface of the work piece loaded in the end station to form a cleave region in the work piece;one or more cleave modules coupled to the racetrack structure, each of the cleave modules being configured to perform a cleave process to release a free-standing film from the work piece along the cleave region, whereupon following release of the free-standing film from the work piece, the work piece is returned to the end station for introduction of more particles; andone or more service modules each connected to the racetrack structure;wherein the one or more service modules include a quality control station for inspecting and preparing the work piece to be used for repeated implantation and cleave processes.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 further comprising an output port coupled to the cleave module to output the free standing film that is detached from the work piece.
  • 3. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more service modules include a tray service module for loading one or more work pieces to a supporting tray, and performing a maintenance to the tray.
  • 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more service modules include an anneal station for performing thermal treatment before or after a cleave process in the one or more cleave modules.
  • 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the accelerator-based ion implanters is configured to introduce particles having an energy of greater than 1 MeV.
  • 6. The system of claim 1 wherein the racetrack structure can be configured to be a closed loop architecture or a single runway architecture.
  • 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the racetrack structure includes a first conveyor to transfer the at least one work piece in a tray from one location to another location, said another location including an end station, one of the one or more cleave modules, or one of the one or more service modules.
  • 8. The system of claim 7 wherein the racetrack structure is scalable to extend the first conveyor and add additional process modules coupled thereto.
  • 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the work piece is returned to the end station utilizing a track robot, a robotic arm, an automated guide vehicle, or a rotating platform.
  • 10. The system of claim 1 further comprising a line balance for the racetrack structure with an adjustable ratio of a number of the one or more accelerator based ion implanters and a number of the one or more cleave modules.
  • 11. A system for manufacturing free-standing films from bulk work pieces, the system comprising: a racetrack structure being configured to transfer at least one work piece;one or more accelerator-based ion implanters coupled to the racetrack structure via an end station, each of the accelerator-based ion implanters being configured to introduce particles to implant into a surface of the work piece loaded in the end station to form a cleave region in the work piece; andone or more cleave modules coupled to the racetrack structure, each of the cleave modules being configured to perform a cleave process to release a free-standing film from the work piece along the cleave region, whereupon following release of the free-standing film from the work piece, the work piece is returned to the end station for introduction of more particles;wherein the one or more accelerator-based ion implanters comprises a RFQ-based linear accelerator, a QFI-based linear accelerator, a cyclotron accelerator, or an electrostatic accelerator for producing particles having energy up to about 5 MeV.
  • 12. The system of claim 11 wherein the particles include hydrogen ions or other light ions with either positive charges or negative charges.
  • 13. The system of claim 11 wherein the work piece can be a boule of crystalline silicon and the surface can be selected to be along crystallographic (111) or (110) plane with a small miscut angles of a few degrees and square or pseudo-square cross-sectional shape.
  • 14. The system of claim 11 wherein the one or more cleave modules further comprise tools for irradiating and scanning using an electronic-magnetic process to the work piece and performing a cleaving process.
  • 15. A method for volume manufacturing free standing thickness of materials from bulk work pieces, the method comprising: providing a racetrack structure including a first conveyor;loading at least a work piece in the conveyor, the work piece having a surface substantially in a predetermined crystallographic plane;transferring the work piece to an end station coupled to the racetrack structure via the first conveyor;generating an ionic particle beam by an implant subsystem coupled to the racetrack structure, the ionic particle beam being introduced to the surface of the work piece in the end station and implanted to a depth defining a cleave region;transferring the work piece via the first conveyor to a cleave module coupled to the racetrack structure, the work piece being treated by one or more processes to cleave a free standing thickness of material along the cleave region;releasing the free standing thickness of material having a thickness substantially equal to the depth;returning the work piece to the end station;transferring the free standing thickness of material out of the cleave module via a second conveyor; andtransferring the free standing thickness of material to a QC module and performing inspection of the work piece within the QC module, the QC module being coupled to the racetrack structure.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein the loading at least a work piece in a tray is performed in a tray service module coupled to the racetrack structure.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 wherein the tray is a platen comprising a plurality of pallets each being configured to hold one work piece with an mechanism to adjust relative surface angle and relative height.
  • 18. The method of claim 15 wherein the racetrack structure can be configured to be a closed loop architecture or a single runway architecture.
  • 19. The method of claim 15 wherein generating an ionic particle beam by the implant subsystem comprises using an accelerator to produce the ionic particle beam having an energy of a few MeV, redirecting the ionic particle beam to the end station, and using a magnetic scanner to scan the ionic particle beam.
  • 20. The method of claim 15 wherein the depth defining the cleave region depends on an combination of energy level and dosage of the ionic particle beam.
  • 21. The method of claim 15 further comprising annealing the work piece within an annealing module coupled to the racetrack structure before it is transferred to the cleave module via the first conveyor.
  • 22. The method of claim 15 wherein the work piece is loaded in the conveyor supported on a tray.
  • 23. The method of claim 15 wherein the work piece is returned to the end station utilizing a conveyor, a track robot, a robotic arm, an automated guide vehicle, or a rotating platform.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The instant nonprovisional patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/091,710, filed Aug. 25, 2008 and incorporated by reference in its entirety herein for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (257)
Number Name Date Kind
2614055 Senarelens Oct 1952 A
3117002 Bronson et al. Jan 1964 A
3225820 Riordan Dec 1965 A
3390033 Brown Jun 1968 A
3392069 Merkel et al. Jul 1968 A
3551213 Boyle Dec 1970 A
3770499 Crowe et al. Nov 1973 A
3786359 King Jan 1974 A
3806380 Kitada et al. Apr 1974 A
3832219 Nelson et al. Aug 1974 A
3900636 Curry et al. Aug 1975 A
3901423 Hillberry et al. Aug 1975 A
3915757 Engel Oct 1975 A
3946334 Yonezu Mar 1976 A
3957107 Alotz et al. May 1976 A
3964957 Walsk Jun 1976 A
3993909 Drews et al. Nov 1976 A
4006340 Gorinas Feb 1977 A
4039416 White Aug 1977 A
4053335 Hu Oct 1977 A
4074139 Pankove Feb 1978 A
4107350 Berg et al. Aug 1978 A
4108751 King Aug 1978 A
4116751 Zaromb Sep 1978 A
4121334 Wallis Oct 1978 A
4170662 Weiss et al. Oct 1979 A
4216906 Olsen et al. Aug 1980 A
4237601 Woolhouse et al. Dec 1980 A
4244348 Wilkes Jan 1981 A
4252837 Auton Feb 1981 A
4255208 Deutscher et al. Mar 1981 A
4274004 Kanai Jun 1981 A
4342631 White et al. Aug 1982 A
4346123 Kaufmann Aug 1982 A
4361600 Brown Nov 1982 A
4368083 Bruel et al. Jan 1983 A
4375125 Byatt Mar 1983 A
4412868 Brown et al. Nov 1983 A
4452644 Bruel et al. Jun 1984 A
4468309 White Aug 1984 A
4471003 Cann Sep 1984 A
4486247 Ecer et al. Dec 1984 A
4490190 Speri Dec 1984 A
4495219 Kato et al. Jan 1985 A
4500563 Ellenberger et al. Feb 1985 A
4508056 Bruel et al. Apr 1985 A
4530149 Jastrzebski et al. Jul 1985 A
4536657 Bruel Aug 1985 A
4539050 Kramler et al. Sep 1985 A
4566403 Fournier Jan 1986 A
4567505 Pease et al. Jan 1986 A
4568563 Jackson et al. Feb 1986 A
4585945 Bruel et al. Apr 1986 A
4645546 Matsushita Feb 1987 A
4684535 Heinecke et al. Aug 1987 A
4704302 Bruel et al. Nov 1987 A
4706377 Shuskus Nov 1987 A
4717683 Parillo Jan 1988 A
4727047 Bozler et al. Feb 1988 A
4764394 Conrad Aug 1988 A
4766086 Oshima et al. Aug 1988 A
4837172 Mizuno et al. Jun 1989 A
4846928 Dolins et al. Jul 1989 A
4847792 Barna et al. Jul 1989 A
4853250 Boulos et al. Aug 1989 A
4883561 Gmitter et al. Nov 1989 A
4887005 Rough et al. Dec 1989 A
4891329 Reismann et al. Jan 1990 A
4894709 Phillips et al. Jan 1990 A
4906594 Yoneda Mar 1990 A
4931405 Kamijo et al. Jun 1990 A
4948458 Ogle Aug 1990 A
4952273 Popov Aug 1990 A
4956693 Sawahata et al. Sep 1990 A
4960073 Suzuki et al. Oct 1990 A
4982090 Wittmaack Jan 1991 A
4983251 Haisma et al. Jan 1991 A
4996077 Moslehi et al. Feb 1991 A
5015353 Hubler et al. May 1991 A
5034343 Rouse et al. Jul 1991 A
5070040 Pankove Dec 1991 A
5082793 Li Jan 1992 A
5102821 Moslehi Apr 1992 A
5110748 Sarma May 1992 A
5133826 Dandl Jul 1992 A
5141878 Benton et al. Aug 1992 A
5162241 Mori et al. Nov 1992 A
5196355 Wittkower Mar 1993 A
5198071 Scudder et al. Mar 1993 A
5198371 Li Mar 1993 A
5202095 Houchin et al. Apr 1993 A
5203960 Dandl Apr 1993 A
5206749 Zavracky et al. Apr 1993 A
5213451 Frank May 1993 A
5213986 Pinker et al. May 1993 A
5234529 Johnson Aug 1993 A
5234535 Beyer et al. Aug 1993 A
5242861 Inaba Sep 1993 A
5250328 Otto Oct 1993 A
5252178 Moslehi Oct 1993 A
5256562 Vu et al. Oct 1993 A
5258320 Zavracky et al. Nov 1993 A
5258325 Spitzer et al. Nov 1993 A
5269880 Jolly et al. Dec 1993 A
5273610 Thomas, III et al. Dec 1993 A
5277748 Sakaguchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5303574 Matossian et al. Apr 1994 A
5304509 Sopori Apr 1994 A
5308776 Gotou May 1994 A
5317236 Zavracky et al. May 1994 A
5342472 Imahashi et al. Aug 1994 A
5344524 Sharma et al. Sep 1994 A
5354381 Sheng Oct 1994 A
5362671 Zavracky et al. Nov 1994 A
5363603 Miller et al. Nov 1994 A
5368710 Chen et al. Nov 1994 A
5370765 Dandl Dec 1994 A
5374564 Bruel Dec 1994 A
5376560 Aronowitz et al. Dec 1994 A
5377031 Vu et al. Dec 1994 A
5403434 Moslehi Apr 1995 A
5404079 Ohkuni et al. Apr 1995 A
5405480 Benzing et al. Apr 1995 A
5409563 Cathey Apr 1995 A
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995 A
5413679 Godbey May 1995 A
5427052 Ohta et al. Jun 1995 A
5435880 Minato et al. Jul 1995 A
5438241 Zavracky et al. Aug 1995 A
5443661 Oguro et al. Aug 1995 A
5444557 Spitzer et al. Aug 1995 A
5459016 Debe et al. Oct 1995 A
5475514 Salerno et al. Dec 1995 A
5476691 Komvopoulos et al. Dec 1995 A
5480842 Clifton et al. Jan 1996 A
5487785 Horiike et al. Jan 1996 A
5494835 Bruel Feb 1996 A
5504328 Bonser Apr 1996 A
5506176 Takizawa Apr 1996 A
5508207 Horai et al. Apr 1996 A
5514235 Mitani et al. May 1996 A
5518965 Menigaux May 1996 A
5528397 Zavracky et al. Jun 1996 A
5539245 Imura et al. Jul 1996 A
5558718 Leung Sep 1996 A
5559043 Bruel Sep 1996 A
5569620 Linn et al. Oct 1996 A
5581385 Spitzer et al. Dec 1996 A
5585304 Hayashi et al. Dec 1996 A
5611855 Wijaranakula Mar 1997 A
5643834 Harada et al. Jul 1997 A
5653811 Chan Aug 1997 A
5686980 Hirayama et al. Nov 1997 A
5700333 Yamazaki et al. Dec 1997 A
5705421 Matsushita et al. Jan 1998 A
5710057 Kenney Jan 1998 A
5714395 Bruel Feb 1998 A
5744852 Linn et al. Apr 1998 A
5753560 Hong et al. May 1998 A
5755914 Yonehara May 1998 A
5763319 Ling et al. Jun 1998 A
5783022 Cha et al. Jul 1998 A
5793913 Kovacic Aug 1998 A
5804086 Bruel Sep 1998 A
5811348 Matsushita et al. Sep 1998 A
5821158 Shishiguchi Oct 1998 A
5824595 Igel et al. Oct 1998 A
5827751 Nuyen Oct 1998 A
5840590 Nuyen Nov 1998 A
5841931 Foresi Nov 1998 A
5854123 Sato et al. Dec 1998 A
5863830 Bruel et al. Jan 1999 A
5869387 Sato et al. Feb 1999 A
5869405 Gonzalez et al. Feb 1999 A
5877070 Goesele et al. Mar 1999 A
5882987 Srikrishnan Mar 1999 A
5897743 Fujimoto et al. Apr 1999 A
5906951 Chu et al. May 1999 A
5909627 Egloff Jun 1999 A
5920764 Hanson et al. Jul 1999 A
5942050 Green et al. Aug 1999 A
5953622 Lee et al. Sep 1999 A
5966620 Sakaguchi et al. Oct 1999 A
5966625 Zhong et al. Oct 1999 A
5968279 MacLeish et al. Oct 1999 A
5985742 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
5993677 Biasse et al. Nov 1999 A
5994207 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
6004868 Rolfson et al. Dec 1999 A
6008128 Habuka et al. Dec 1999 A
6010579 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6013563 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6013567 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6020252 Aspar et al. Feb 2000 A
6027988 Cheung et al. Feb 2000 A
6033974 Henley et al. Mar 2000 A
6048411 Henley et al. Apr 2000 A
6066915 Pepi May 2000 A
6077383 Laporte Jun 2000 A
6083324 Henley et al. Jul 2000 A
6103599 Henley et al. Aug 2000 A
6107213 Tayanaka Aug 2000 A
6107653 Fitzgerald Aug 2000 A
6120597 Levy et al. Sep 2000 A
6143628 Sato et al. Nov 2000 A
6150239 Goesele et al. Nov 2000 A
6159824 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6162705 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6171965 Kang Jan 2001 B1
6171982 Sato Jan 2001 B1
6184111 Henley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190998 Bruel et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191007 Matsui et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194327 Gonzalez et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204151 Malik et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214701 Matsushita et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225192 Aspar et al. May 2001 B1
6251754 Ohshima et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263941 Bryan et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274464 Drobny et al. Aug 2001 B2
6287941 Kang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291321 Fitzgerald Sep 2001 B1
6294478 Sakaguchi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6335269 Sato Jan 2002 B1
6342436 Takizawa Jan 2002 B1
6376806 Yoo Apr 2002 B2
6452091 Nakagawa et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455397 Belford Sep 2002 B1
6455399 Malik et al. Sep 2002 B2
6503773 Fitzgerald Jan 2003 B2
6513564 Bryan et al. Feb 2003 B2
6514836 Belford Feb 2003 B2
6534381 Cheung et al. Mar 2003 B2
6563152 Roberts et al. May 2003 B2
6621131 Murthy et al. Sep 2003 B2
6723661 Fitzergald Apr 2004 B2
6809009 Aspar et al. Oct 2004 B2
6858107 Ghyselen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6911376 Yoo Jun 2005 B2
6969668 Kang et al. Nov 2005 B1
7019339 Atwater Mar 2006 B2
7354815 Henley Apr 2008 B2
8088669 Yamazaki Jan 2012 B2
20010019371 Zavracky et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010039095 Marty Nov 2001 A1
20020174828 Vasat et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030077885 Aspar et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030096098 Ovshinsky et al. May 2003 A1
20030140844 Maa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030186493 Iwasaki et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040253794 Faris Dec 2004 A1
20050118754 Henley et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050189013 Hartley Sep 2005 A1
20060014366 Currie Jan 2006 A1
20060030122 Shimoda et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060038182 Rogers et al. Feb 2006 A1
20110121207 Brailove May 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (86)
Number Date Country
834363 Mar 1952 DE
19753494 Oct 1998 DE
084287 Jul 1983 EP
099778 Feb 1984 EP
155875 Feb 1984 EP
112238 Jun 1984 EP
181249 May 1986 EP
112230 Apr 1987 EP
0296804 Dec 1988 EP
164281 Feb 1989 EP
355913 Feb 1990 EP
379828 Aug 1990 EP
459177 Dec 1991 EP
504714 Sep 1992 EP
533551 Mar 1993 EP
0553852 Aug 1993 EP
660140 Jun 1995 EP
665587 Aug 1995 EP
0665588 Aug 1995 EP
703609 Mar 1996 EP
763849 Mar 1997 EP
0807970 Nov 1997 EP
0843344 May 1998 EP
867917 Sep 1998 EP
867921 Sep 1998 EP
0905767 Mar 1999 EP
961312 Dec 1999 EP
0971395 Jan 2000 EP
1085562 Mar 2001 EP
1558881 Feb 1969 FR
2235474 Jan 1975 FR
2261802 Sep 1975 FR
2266304 Oct 1975 FR
2298880 Aug 1976 FR
2519437 Jul 1983 FR
2529383 Dec 1983 FR
2575601 Jul 1984 FR
2537768 Aug 1985 FR
2560426 Aug 1985 FR
2563377 Oct 1985 FR
2537777 Apr 1986 FR
2681472 Mar 1993 FR
2714524 Jun 1995 FR
2715501 Jul 1995 FR
2715502 Jul 1995 FR
2715503 Jul 1995 FR
2720189 Nov 1995 FR
2725074 Mar 1996 FR
2211991 Jul 1989 GB
2231197 Nov 1990 GB
53-104156 Sep 1978 JP
58-030145 Feb 1983 JP
58-144475 Aug 1983 JP
59-046750 Mar 1984 JP
59-054217 Mar 1984 JP
59-114744 Jul 1984 JP
59-139539 Aug 1984 JP
59-193904 Nov 1984 JP
60-207237 Oct 1985 JP
60-235434 Nov 1985 JP
61-125012 Jun 1986 JP
3-109731 May 1991 JP
3-132055 Jun 1991 JP
3-265156 Nov 1991 JP
4-076503 Mar 1992 JP
4-246594 Sep 1992 JP
4-298023 Oct 1992 JP
5-211128 Aug 1993 JP
5-218053 Aug 1993 JP
7-164728 Jun 1995 JP
7-215800 Aug 1995 JP
7-254690 Oct 1995 JP
7-263291 Oct 1995 JP
8-097389 Apr 1996 JP
10-200080 Jul 1998 JP
10-275905 Oct 1998 JP
11-045840 Feb 1999 JP
2901031 Jun 1999 JP
2910001 Jun 1999 JP
2000-94317 Apr 2000 JP
WO 9510718 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9520824 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9531825 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9935674 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0063965 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0154175 Jul 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100044595 A1 Feb 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61091710 Aug 2008 US