The present disclosure relates generally to a reduced noise microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device, and more particularly to a MEMS device having a reduced noise structure and a force feedback system.
MEMS devices are used in a variety of applications. For example, many types of acoustic sensors include a MEMS die having a diaphragm and a backplate and an integrated circuit, in which relative movement between the backplate and the diaphragm causes a change in capacitance, which is detected by the integrated circuit and ultimately interpreted as sound. As with any acoustic sensor, it is usually a design goal to minimize noise.
The foregoing and other features of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. These drawings depict only several embodiments in accordance with the disclosure and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope.
In the following detailed description, various embodiments are described with reference to the appended drawings. The skilled person will understand that the accompanying drawings are schematic and simplified for clarity. Like reference numerals refer to like elements or components throughout. Like elements or components will therefore not necessarily be described in detail with respect to each figure.
According to various embodiments described herein, a MEMS die can include a dual diaphragm having one or more pluralities of electrodes disposed within a low pressure region disposed between the diaphragms, for example, as shown in U.S. application Ser. No. 17/133,506, filed on Dec. 23, 2020 and hereby incorporated in its entirety herein. Such a diaphragm structural arrangement can be useful in reducing acoustic damping noise associated with air typically within a MEMS structure. MEMS dies having a miniaturized back volume for reducing thermal boundary layer noise in the back volume are shown in U.S. application Ser. No. 17/037,959, filed on Sep. 30, 2020 and hereby incorporated in its entirety herein. A MEMS die constructed from a combination of a low pressure diaphragm structure and a miniaturized back volume and used, for example, as a transducer, may still produce acoustic noise that can be reduced using various embodiments described herein.
According to an embodiment, a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) device comprises a diaphragm assembly and an enclosure disposed on a side of the diaphragm assembly, which includes a first diaphragm, a second diaphragm facing the first diaphragm, with a low pressure region being defined therebetween. The diaphragm assembly further includes a first plurality of electrodes, each of the first plurality having a first end connected to a first side of the first diaphragm and a second end connected to the second diaphragm, a second plurality of electrodes, each of the second plurality having a first end connected to the first diaphragm and a free second end, and a third plurality of electrodes, each of the third plurality having a free first end and a second end connected to the second diaphragm. A solid dielectric is spaced between the first and second diaphragms and includes a plurality of apertures. Each electrode of the first, second, and third pluralities of electrodes is disposed at least partially within an aperture of the plurality of apertures, and the dielectric surrounds the second ends of each of the second plurality of electrodes and the first ends of each of the third plurality of electrodes. The MEMS device further includes a force feedback system that receives output from the diaphragm assembly and produces a feedback voltage that is applied to the diaphragm assembly to produce an electrostatic force on the diaphragm assembly that counters a low-frequency pressure across the diaphragm assembly.
In an embodiment, the MEMS device includes an enclosure that is disposed on a second side of the first diaphragm opposite the first side. The enclosure bounds a back volume in which all points within the back volume are less than a single thermal boundary layer thickness from a nearest surface of the enclosure.
According to an embodiment, the MEMS device further comprises a tunnel structure disposed through the first and second diaphragms, wherein the tunnel structure provides fluid communication between the second sides of the first and second diaphragms, and wherein the tunnel structure is configured to maintain the low pressure region disposed between the first sides of the first and second diaphragms outside of the tunnel structure.
In an embodiment, the MEMS device further includes a force feedback system comprising a differential amplifier. The force feedback system further includes a first electrical connection between the first ends of at least a first subset of the second plurality of electrodes and a first input to the differential amplifier, and a second electrical connection between the second ends of at least a first subset of the third plurality of electrodes and a second input to the differential amplifier. A frequency filter circuit is included having an input connected to an output of the differential amplifier. The force feedback system further includes a feedback amplifier having an input connected to an output of the frequency filter circuit and an output connected to a second subset of the first plurality of electrodes not connected to the voltage source. Motion of the diaphragm assembly in response to pressure produces a voltage signal at an output of the differential amplifier, the voltage signal is filtered by the frequency filter circuit to select a portion of the signal below a predetermined frequency, and the selected portion of the signal is provided to the feedback amplifier to produce a feedback voltage that is applied to the second subset of the first plurality of electrodes. The feedback voltage produces an electrostatic force on the diaphragm assembly counter to the force of the pressure.
Turning to
Referring to
In an embodiment, a first plurality of electrodes 120 is disposed between the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B. Each of the first plurality 120 of electrodes has a first end 122 connected to the first side 124 of the first diaphragm 106A and a second end 126 connected to the first side 128 of the second diaphragm 106B. The diaphragm assembly 106 in an embodiment further comprises a second plurality of electrodes 130 disposed between the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B. Each of the second plurality 130 of electrodes has a first end 132 connected to the first side 124 of the first diaphragm 106A and a free second end 134. In an embodiment the diaphragm assembly 106 further includes a third plurality of electrodes 140 disposed between the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B. Each of the third plurality 140 of electrodes has a free first end 142 and a second end 144 connected to the first side 128 of the second diaphragm 106B.
Still referring to
In an embodiment each of the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B and the solid dielectric 150 comprises at least an insulative layer of material 107. The insulative material 107 can be any insulative material as known in the art that would not be damaged during a sacrificial layer removal process. For example, without limitation, the insulative material 107 can be silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, metal oxides, polymers, materials that are not damaged by a sacrificial layer removal process, and combinations thereof.
Referring again to
In an embodiment, both the diaphragm assembly 106 and the solid dielectric 150 are circular in a plan view (as viewed along the arrow labeled A in
In an embodiment, the solid dielectric 150 is relatively thick and stiff compared to the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B and remains relatively motionless when the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B are deflected. Deflection of the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B moves the first, second, and third pluralities of electrodes 120, 130, 140 relative to the solid dielectric 150.
In an embodiment the solid dielectric 150 has a thickness of about 3 microns; however, in other embodiments the solid dielectric 150 can have a thickness in a range between about 1 micron and about 10 microns. Further, in an embodiment the solid dielectric has holes that are cylindrically shaped and about 3 microns in diameter; however, in other embodiments the holes can have any cross-sectional shape and/or can have a largest cross-sectional dimension in a range between about 0.6 microns and about 6 microns. In an embodiment the spacers 182, 184 have a thickness of about 1.5 microns; however, in other embodiments the spacers 182, 184 can have a thickness in a range between about 0.1 micron and about 10 microns. The first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B in an embodiment are about 0.5 micron thick; however, in other embodiments the first and second diaphragms 106A and 106B can have a thickness in a range between about 0.1 micron and 2 microns. The first, second, and third pluralities of electrodes 120, 130, and 140 in an embodiment are made from polycrystalline silicon and are cylindrically shaped and about 2 microns in diameter; however, in other embodiments the first, second, and third pluralities of electrodes 120, 130, and 140 can be made of other conductive materials and can have other shapes and/or have a largest cross-sectional dimension of between about 0.5 micron and 5 microns.
Referring to
Similarly, still referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Still referring to
In an embodiment the tunnel structure 118, as shown schematically in
The at least one passage 114 allows for pressure equalization between the back volume 175 and the surrounding environment. The at least one passage 114 is important for low-frequency roll off (LFRO) performance of the device ultimately made from the MEMS die 100, and in some embodiments there can be more than one passage 114 disposed through the diaphragm assembly 106.
Referring again to
where ω is the operating angular frequency of the diaphragm assembly 106, κ is the thermal conductivity, ρ is the density and Cp is the specific heat at constant pressure of the gas within the back volume 175.
The cross-sectional view of the enclosure 170 illustrated in
Turning to
As shown in
The assembly 300 includes an electrical circuit disposed within the enclosed volume 308. In an embodiment, the electrical circuit includes an integrated circuit (IC) 310. In an embodiment the IC 310 is disposed within the interior of the housing, for example, on the first surface 305 of the base 302, and is electrically connected to the diaphragm assembly 106. The IC 310 may be an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Alternatively, the IC 310 may include a semiconductor die integrating various analog, analog-to-digital, and/or digital circuits. In an embodiment the cover 304 is disposed over the first surface 305 of the base 302 covering the MEMS acoustic transducer 100 and the IC 310.
The portion of enclosed volume 308 between the cover 304 and the outer surface of MEMS transducer 100 is not acoustically active. The cover 304 is typically soldered in a region around its periphery to the base 302 which would cause the pressure within the portion of enclosed volume 308 to increase dramatically during soldering. To prevent solder from being blown out of the soldered region, in an embodiment the cover 304 includes a vent hole 316 to the outside atmosphere and/or the soldered region is discontinuous, for example, having one or more openings 318 disposed therethrough so that air can escape between the cover 304 and the base 302
In the assembly 300 of
Structural aspects of the MEMS die 100 have been described hereinabove. Embodiments of electrical circuitry connected with the MEMS die 100 (and included, for example, within the IC 310) are described hereinbelow.
Referring to
Still referring to
In operation, a MEMS device incorporating the MEMS die 100 and the force feedback system 400 described in regard to
The acoustic low pass frequency determined by the resistance of the pierces 114A and 114B and the effective compliance of the back volume 175 should be lower than that of the predetermined frequency set by the frequency filter circuit 460. The acoustic low pass frequency is typically less than 20 Hz, for example, 10 Hz, 5 Hz, 1 Hz, 0.1 Hz, or 0.01 Hz. By lowering the acoustic low pass frequency, the overall acoustic noise of the MEMS device for example, a microphone is reduced. By using force feedback with a predetermined frequency higher than the acoustic low pass frequency, the microphone output is restricted to the common audio frequency band and potential overload from sub-audible signals is avoided.
The selected portion of the signal is provided to the feedback amplifier 470 and the optional PWM circuit 480 to produce a feedback voltage that is applied to the second subset of the first plurality of electrodes 120. The feedback voltage produces an electrostatic force on the diaphragm assembly 106 that is counter to the force of the pressure. For example, by utilizing a frequency of 35 Hz, large acoustic impulses at frequencies of 35 Hz and below that could potentially overload the diaphragm assembly can be removed via the force feedback provided by the described circuitry.
Referring to
Still referring to
In operation, a MEMS device incorporating the MEMS die 100 and the force feedback system 500 described in regard to
Again, the selected portion of the signal is provided to the second amplifier 550 to produce a feedback voltage that is applied to the second subset of the first plurality of electrodes 120. The feedback voltage produces an electrostatic force on the diaphragm assembly 106 that is counter to the force of the pressure causing motion of the diaphragm assembly 106.
The components described in the circuitry with regard to
Steps in a production process utilized to produce the MEMS die 100 as described hereinabove include etching, masking, patterning, cutting, boring, and/or release steps executed on a workpiece. Accordingly, all of the steps are not described in detail herein. However, generally the portions of the MEMS die 100 that ultimately end up as the space 112 and the back volume 175 are layered onto a workpiece using sacrificial material, or otherwise bored or etched out of a solid block of material.
With respect to the use of plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
Unless otherwise noted, the use of the words “approximate,” “about,” “around,” “substantially,” etc., mean plus or minus ten percent.
The foregoing description of illustrative embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and of description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or limiting with respect to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the disclosed embodiments. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4154115 | Hartung et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4435986 | Choffat | Mar 1984 | A |
| 6075867 | Bay et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6431003 | Stark et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6435033 | Delaye | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6535460 | Loeppert et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6571445 | Ladabaum | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6662663 | Chen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 7030407 | Michler | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7040173 | Dehe | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7124638 | Kandler | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7150195 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7190038 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7470546 | Lehmann | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7489593 | Nguyen-Dinh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7535156 | Kvisteroy et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7545012 | Smith et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7781249 | Laming et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7793550 | Elian et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7795695 | Weigold et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7825484 | Martin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7829961 | Hsiao | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7903831 | Song | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918135 | Hammerschmidt | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8127619 | Hammerschmidt | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8339764 | Steeneken et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8461655 | Klein et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8575037 | Friza et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8650963 | Barr et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8723277 | Dehe et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8809973 | Theuss | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8969980 | Lee | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8989411 | Hall et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9031266 | Dehe et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9179221 | Barzen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9181080 | Dehe et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9237402 | Loeppert | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9321630 | Xu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9332330 | Elian et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9380381 | Straeussnigg et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9383282 | Besling et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9383285 | Phan Le et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9425757 | Straeussnigg et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9432759 | Elian et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9438979 | Dehe | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9510107 | Dehe et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9516428 | Dehe et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9549263 | Uchida | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9550211 | Dirksen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9631996 | Wiesbauer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9689770 | Hammerschmidt | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9828237 | Walther et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9884757 | Winkler et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9903779 | Hammerschmidt | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9942677 | Wiesbauer et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 10129676 | Walther et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10231061 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10322481 | Dehe et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10433070 | Dehe et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10560771 | Dehe et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10582306 | Dehe | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10589990 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10641626 | Bretthauer et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10669151 | Strasser et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10676346 | Walther et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10689250 | Fueldner et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10715926 | Bretthauer et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10939214 | Kuntzman et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 20020132113 | Tanaka | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20050177045 | Degertekin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207605 | Dehe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219953 | Bayram et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20070205492 | Wang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278501 | Macpherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080175425 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080267431 | Leidl et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279407 | Pahl | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283942 | Huang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001553 | Pahl et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175477 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090180655 | Tien et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100046780 | Song | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052082 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128914 | Khenkin | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170346 | Opitz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100173437 | Wygant et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100183181 | Wang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100246877 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290644 | Wu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322443 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322451 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110013787 | Chang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110075875 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20120051575 | Akino | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20130001550 | Seeger et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20140071642 | Theuss | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140109680 | Tsai | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20150001647 | Dehe | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150090043 | Ruhl et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150247879 | Meinhold | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150296307 | Shao et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160096726 | Dehe et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20180091906 | Khenkin et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180146296 | Meisel | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180152798 | Thomsen | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180194615 | Nawaz | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180234774 | Walther et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180317022 | Evans et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190112182 | Metzger-Brueckl et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190181776 | Tumpold et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190246459 | Tumpold et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190270639 | Lorenz et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190331531 | Glacer et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190339193 | Eberl et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190352175 | Tumpold et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190363757 | Mikolajczak et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200057031 | Theuss et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20210120323 | Naderyan et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 103344377 | Oct 2013 | CN |
| 106162476 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 206212271 | May 2017 | CN |
| 108551646 | Sep 2018 | CN |
| 110115048 | Sep 2019 | CN |
| 100571967 | Apr 2006 | KR |
| 2012085335 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2019183283 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/037,959 for application entitled “Sub-Miniature Microphone,” Applicant: Knowles Electronics LLC, filed Sep. 30, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/111,465 for application entitled “MEMS Device With Electrodes and a Dielectric,” Applicant: Knowles Electronics LLC, filed Dec. 3, 2020. |
| Andrews et al., “A comparison of squeeze-film theory with measurements on a microstructure,” Sensors and Actuators A 36 (1993) 79-87, 9 pages. |
| Bay et al., “Design of a silicon microphone with differential read-out of a sealed double parallel-plate capacitor,” Sensors and Acutators A 53 (1996), pp. 232-236, 5 pages. |
| Hansen et al., “Wideband micromachined capacitive microphones with radio frequency detection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2), Aug. 2004, pp. 828-842, 15 pages. |
| Lin, Der-Song, “Interface Engineering of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers for Medical Applications,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Committee on Graduate Studies of Stanford University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Jun. 2011, 168 pages. |
| Park et al., “Fabrication of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers via Local Oxidation and Direct Water Bonding,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 20, No. 1, Feb. 2011, 10 pages. |
| Krzysztof Iniewski, “Smart Sensors for Industrial Applications,” Figure 19. 1, p. 306, 1 page (2013). |
| Wygant et al., “50 kHz Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers for Generation of Highly Directional Sound with Parametric Arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, No. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 193-203, 11 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220337947 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |