The present disclosure relates generally to robotic systems and, more particularly, to robotic systems for shoulder arthroplasty.
Robotic systems used in surgery are well known. One such system comprises a robotic manipulator and a cutting tool for sculpting a bone into a desired shape. The cutting tool is coupled to the robotic manipulator to remove material from the bone for purposes of creating space to receive an implant. Typically, these systems are used to prepare bones for hip implants and knee implants. As the world population continues to live longer, there is a growing need for arthroplasty. Owing to the relatively greater need for hip arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty, prior art robotic systems focus on preparing bones for hip and knee procedures. There remains a need for robotic systems for shoulder arthroplasty to provide higher accuracy and more precision in replacing shoulder joints.
Shoulder arthroplasty procedures commonly involve preparing a patient's humerus to receive a stemmed implant and preparing the patient's glenoid cavity to receive a glenoid implant. However, in some cases, instead of preparing the humerus to receive a stemmed implant, the humerus is prepared for a stemless implant. Generally speaking, stemless implants are bone-sparing, meaning that less bony material is required to be removed from the patient as compared to stemmed implants. This can provide several advantages to the patient. Yet, because a stem is not placed in the humerus, i.e., in a humeral canal that can enhance stability of the implant, there is a desire and need for stemless implants and procedures that securely place such stemless implants in the humerus.
A robotic surgery system is provided for preparing a humerus to receive a shoulder implant. The robotic surgery system comprises a robotic manipulator and a cutting tool to be coupled to the robotic manipulator. A localizer is configured to track movement of the cutting tool and the humerus. A controller is coupled to the robotic manipulator and the localizer. The controller is configured to operate the robotic manipulator to control movement of the cutting tool relative to the humerus based on a virtual object that defines a volume of material to be removed from the humerus to receive the shoulder implant. The controller is further configured to determine positions of a plurality of landmarks on the humerus, define a virtual resection in a coordinate system based on the plurality of landmarks, and define the virtual object in the coordinate system based on a location of the virtual resection.
A method is provided for performing robotic surgery with a robotic manipulator and a cutting tool coupled to the robotic manipulator to prepare a humerus to receive a shoulder implant. The method comprises determining positions of a plurality of landmarks on the humerus and defining a virtual resection in a coordinate system based on the positions of the plurality of landmarks. A virtual object is defined in the coordinate system based on a location of the virtual resection wherein the virtual object defines a volume of material to be removed from the humerus to receive the shoulder implant. The method further comprises tracking movement of the cutting tool, tracking movement of the humerus, and controlling movement of the cutting tool relative to the humerus based on the virtual object to remove the volume of material from the humerus.
Another robotic surgery system is provided for preparing a humerus to receive a stemless shoulder implant. The robotic surgery system comprising a robotic manipulator and a cutting tool to be coupled to the robotic manipulator. A localizer is configured to track movement of the cutting tool and the humerus. A controller is coupled to the robotic manipulator and the localizer. The controller is configured to operate the robotic manipulator to control movement of the cutting tool relative to the humerus based on a virtual object that defines a volume of material to be removed from the humerus to receive the stemless shoulder implant. The controller is further configured to: define a virtual intramedullary axis of the humerus in a coordinate system prior to resecting a humeral head of the humerus; determine positions of a plurality of landmarks on the humerus; plan a resection of the humeral head based on a location of the virtual intramedullary axis and the positions of the plurality of landmarks; and define the virtual object in the coordinate system based on the planned resection.
Another method is provided for performing robotic surgery with a robotic manipulator and a cutting tool coupled to the robotic manipulator to prepare a humerus to receive a shoulder implant. The method comprises defining a virtual intramedullary axis of the humerus in a coordinate system prior to resecting a humeral head of the humerus and determining positions of a plurality of landmarks on the humerus. A resection of the humeral head is planned based on a location of the virtual intramedullary axis and the positions of the plurality of landmarks. A virtual object is defined in the coordinate system based on the planned resection, wherein the virtual object defines a volume of material to be removed from the humerus to receive the shoulder implant. The method further comprises tracking movement of the cutting tool, tracking movement of the humerus, and controlling movement of the cutting tool relative to the humerus based on the virtual object to remove the volume of material from the humerus.
Another method is provided for planning a surgery to prepare a humerus to receive a stemless shoulder implant based on a future location of a stemmed shoulder implant to be placed in the humerus during a revision surgery. The method comprises defining the future location of the stemmed shoulder implant in a coordinate system associated with the humerus, wherein the future location is defined in the coordinate system prior to resecting a humeral head of the humerus and prior to removing a volume of material from the humerus to receive the stemless shoulder implant. The method also comprises planning a location of the stemless shoulder implant in the coordinate system based on the future location of the stemmed shoulder implant defined in the coordinate system so that movement of one or more cutting tools can be controlled to resect the humeral head and remove the volume of material from the humerus to receive the stemless shoulder implant based on the planned location of the stemless shoulder implant, which is derived from the future location of the stemmed shoulder implant.
Advantages of the present disclosure will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The guidance station 20 is set up to track movement of various objects in the operating room. Such objects include, for example, a surgical tool 22, a humerus H of a patient, and a scapula S of the patient. The guidance station 20 tracks these objects for purposes of displaying their relative positions and orientations to the surgeon and, in some cases, for purposes of controlling movement (e.g., causing movement, guiding movement, constraining movement, etc.) of the surgical tool 22 relative to virtual cutting boundaries or other virtual objects associated with the humerus H and scapula S.
The guidance station 20 includes a computer cart assembly 24 that houses a navigation controller 26. A navigation interface is in operative communication with the navigation controller 26. The navigation interface includes a first display 28 adapted to be situated outside of a sterile field and a second display 29 adapted to be situated inside the sterile field. The displays 28, 29 are adjustably mounted to the computer cart assembly 24. First and second input devices such as a keyboard and mouse can be used to input information into the navigation controller 26 or otherwise select/control certain aspects of the navigation controller 26. Other input devices are contemplated including a touch screen 30 or voice-activation.
A localizer 34 communicates with the navigation controller 26. In the embodiment shown, the localizer 34 is an optical localizer and includes a camera unit 36. Other types of localizers are also contemplated, including localizers that employ ultrasound, radio frequency (RF) signals, electromagnetic fields, and the like. The camera unit 36 has an outer casing 38 that houses one or more optical position sensors 40. In some embodiments at least two optical sensors 40 are employed, preferably three or four. The optical sensors 40 may be four separate charge-coupled devices (CCD). In one embodiment four, one-dimensional CCDs are employed. It should be appreciated that in other embodiments, separate camera units, each with a separate CCD, or two or more CCDs, could also be arranged around the operating room. The CCDs detect infrared (IR) signals.
The camera unit 36 is mounted on an adjustable arm to position the optical sensors 40 with a field of view of the below discussed trackers that, ideally, is free from obstructions. In some embodiments the camera unit 36 is adjustable in at least one degree of freedom by rotating about a rotational joint. In other embodiments, the camera unit 36 is adjustable about two or more degrees of freedom.
The camera unit 36 includes a camera controller 42 in communication with the optical sensors 40 to receive signals from the optical sensors 40. The camera controller 42 communicates with the navigation controller 26 through either a wired or wireless connection (not shown). One such connection may be an IEEE 1394 interface, which is a serial bus interface standard for high-speed communications and isochronous real-time data transfer. The connection could also use a company specific protocol. In other embodiments, the optical sensors 40 communicate directly with the navigation controller 26.
Position and orientation signals and/or data are transmitted to the navigation controller 26 for purposes of tracking objects. The computer cart assembly 24, display 28, and camera unit 36 may be like those described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,725,162 to Malackowski, et al. issued on May 25, 2010, entitled “Surgery System,” hereby incorporated by reference.
The navigation controller 26 can be a personal computer or laptop computer. The navigation controller 26 has the display 28, central processing unit (CPU) and/or other processors, memory (not shown), and storage (not shown). The navigation controller 26 is loaded with software. The software converts the signals received from the camera unit 36 into data representative of the position and orientation of the objects being tracked.
The guidance station 20 is operable with a plurality of tracking devices 44, 46, 48, also referred to herein as trackers. In the illustrated embodiment, one tracker 44 is firmly affixed to the humerus H of the patient and another tracker 46 is firmly affixed to the scapula S of the patient. The trackers 44, 46 are firmly affixed to sections of bone. The trackers 44, 46 could be mounted like those shown in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0200621, published on Jul. 17, 2014, entitled, “Navigation Systems and Methods for Indicating and Reducing Line-of-Sight Errors,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The trackers 44, 46 could be mounted to other tissue types or parts of the anatomy.
A tool tracker 48 is firmly attached to the surgical tool 22. The tool tracker 48 may be integrated into the surgical tool 22 during manufacture or may be separately mounted to the surgical tool 22 in preparation for surgical procedures. In the embodiment shown, the surgical tool 22 is attached to a manipulator 56 of the machining station 12. Such an arrangement is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 9,119,655, issued Sep. 1, 2015, entitled, “Surgical Manipulator Capable of Controlling a Surgical Instrument in Multiple Modes,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
A separate tracker (not shown) may be attached to a base 57 of the manipulator 56 to track movement of the base 57 in some embodiments. In this case, the working end of the surgical tool 22 may be tracked via the base tracker by virtue of additional encoder data being provided by encoders in joints of the manipulator 56, which provide joint position data that can be collectively processed to generate information regarding a location of the working end of the surgical tool 22 relative to the base 57. The working end of the surgical tool 22, which is being tracked by virtue of the tool tracker 48 (or base tracker in some cases), may be an energy applicator EA such as a rotating bur, saw blade, electrical ablation device, or the like. The energy applicator EA may be a separate component that is releasably connected to a handpiece of the surgical tool 22 or may be integrally formed with the handpiece.
The trackers 44, 46, 48 can be battery powered with an internal battery or may have leads to receive power through the navigation controller 26, which, like the camera unit 36, receives external power.
The optical sensors 40 of the localizer 34 receive light signals from the trackers 44, 46, 48. In the illustrated embodiment, the trackers 44, 46, 48 are active trackers. In this embodiment, each tracker 44, 46, 48 has at least three active tracking elements or markers for transmitting light signals to the optical sensors 40. The active markers can be, for example, light emitting diodes or LEDs 50 (see
Each of the LEDs 50 are connected to a tracker controller (not shown) located in a housing of the associated tracker 44, 46, 48 that transmits/receives data to/from the navigation controller 26. In one embodiment, the tracker controllers transmit data on the order of several Megabytes/second through wired connections with the navigation controller 26. In other embodiments, a wireless connection may be used. In these embodiments, the navigation controller 26 has a transceiver (not shown) to receive the data from the tracker controller.
In other embodiments, the trackers 44, 46, 48 may have passive markers (not shown), such as reflectors that reflect light emitted from the camera unit 36. The reflected light is then received by the optical sensors 40. Active and passive arrangements are well known in the art.
In some embodiments, the trackers 44, 46, 48 also include a gyroscope sensor and accelerometer, such as the trackers shown in U.S. Pat. No. 9,008,757, issued on Apr. 14, 2015, entitled, “Navigation System Including Optical and Non-Optical Sensors,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The navigation controller 26 includes a navigation processor 52. It should be understood that the navigation processor 52 could include one or more processors to control operation of the navigation controller 26. The processors can be any type of microprocessor or multi-processor system. The navigation controller 26 may additionally or alternatively comprise one or more microcontrollers, field programmable gate arrays, systems on a chip, discrete circuitry, and/or other suitable hardware, software, or firmware that is capable of carrying out the functions described herein. The term processor is not intended to limit the scope of any embodiment to a single processor.
The camera unit 36 receives optical signals from the LEDs 50 of the trackers 44, 46, 48 and outputs to the processor 52 signals relating to the position of the LEDs 50 of the trackers 44, 46, 48 relative to the localizer 34. Based on the received optical (and non-optical signals in some embodiments), navigation processor 52 generates data indicating the relative positions and orientations of the trackers 44, 46, 48 relative to the localizer 34 using triangulation and/or other techniques.
Prior to the start of the surgical procedure, additional data are loaded into the navigation processor 52. Based on the position and orientation of the trackers 44, 46, 48 and the previously loaded data, the navigation processor 52 determines the position of the working end of the surgical tool 22 (e.g., the centroid of a surgical bur, cutting envelope of a sagittal saw, etc.) and the orientation of the surgical tool 22 relative to the tissue against which the working end is to be applied. In some embodiments, the navigation processor 52 forwards these data to a manipulator controller 54. The manipulator controller 54 can then use the data to control the manipulator 56 as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,119,655, issued Sep. 1, 2015, entitled, “Surgical Manipulator Capable of Controlling a Surgical Instrument in Multiple Modes,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In one embodiment, the surgical tool 22 is controlled to stay within one or more preoperatively defined virtual boundaries set by the surgeon, which defines the material (e.g., tissue) of the humerus H and scapula S to be removed by the surgical tool 22. These boundaries are defined by virtual objects stored in memory in the robotic system 10 (e.g., in the navigation controller 26 and/or the manipulator controller 54). The boundaries may be defined within a virtual model of the humerus H and scapula S and be represented as a mesh surface, constructive solid geometry (CSG), voxels, or may be represented using other boundary representation techniques. The boundaries may also be defined separately from virtual models of the humerus H and scapula S.
The navigation processor 52 also generates image signals that indicate the relative position of the working end of the surgical tool 22 to the tissue to be removed. These image signals are applied to the displays 28, 29. The displays 28, 29, based on these signals, generate images that allow the surgeon and staff to view the relative position of the working end to the surgical site. The displays, 28, 29, as discussed above, may include a touch screen or other input/output device that allows entry of commands.
In the embodiment shown in
The manipulator 56 has the ability to operate in one or more of: (1) a free mode in which a user grasps the end effector of the manipulator 56 in order to cause movement of the surgical tool 22 (e.g., directly, through force/torque sensor measurements that cause active driving of the manipulator 56, passively, or otherwise); (2) a haptic mode in which the user grasps the end effector of the manipulator 56 to cause movement as in the free mode, but is restricted in movement by the virtual boundaries defined by the virtual objects stored in the robotic system 10; (3) a semi-autonomous mode in which the surgical tool 22 is moved by the manipulator 56 along a tool path (e.g., the active joints of the manipulator 56 are operated to move the surgical tool 22 without requiring force/torque on the end effector from the user); (4) a service mode in which the manipulator 56 performs preprogrammed automated movements to enable servicing; or (5) other modes to facilitate preparation of the manipulator 56 for use, e.g., for draping, etc. Examples of operation in the haptic mode and the semi-autonomous mode are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,010,180, issued Aug. 30, 2011, entitled, “Haptic Guidance System and Method” and U.S. Pat. No. 9,119,655, issued Sep. 1, 2015, entitled, “Surgical Manipulator Capable of Controlling a Surgical Instrument in Multiple Modes,” the entire disclosures of both of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
During operation in the haptic mode, for certain surgical tasks, the user manually manipulates (e.g., manually moves or manually causes the movement of) the manipulator 56 to manipulate the surgical tool 22 to perform the surgical procedure on the patient, such as drilling, cutting, reaming, implant installation, and the like. As the user manipulates the surgical tool 22, the guidance station 20 tracks the location of the surgical tool 22 and/or the manipulator 56 and provides haptic feedback (e.g., force feedback) to the user to limit the user's ability to manually move (or manually cause movement of) the surgical tool 22 beyond one or more predefined virtual boundaries that are registered (mapped) to the patient's anatomy, which results in highly accurate and repeatable drilling, cutting, reaming, and/or implant placement.
The manipulator controller 54 may have a central processing unit (CPU) and/or other manipulator processors, memory (not shown), and storage (not shown). The manipulator controller 54 is loaded with software as described below. The manipulator processors could include one or more processors to control operation of the manipulator 56. The processors can be any type of microprocessor, multi-processor, and/or multi-core processing system. The manipulator controller 54 may additionally or alternatively comprise one or more microcontrollers, field programmable gate arrays, systems on a chip, discrete circuitry, and/or other suitable hardware, software, or firmware that is capable of carrying out the functions described herein. The term processor is not intended to limit any embodiment to a single processor.
In one version, in the haptic mode, the manipulator controller 54 determines the desired location to which the surgical tool 22 should be moved based on forces and torques applied by the user on the surgical tool 22. In this version, most users are physically unable to actually move the manipulator 56 any appreciable amount to reach the desired position, but the manipulator 56 emulates the user's desired positioning by sensing the applied forces and torques and reacting in a way that gives the user the impression that the user is actually moving the surgical tool 22 even though active motors on the joints are performing the movement. For example, based on the determination of the desired location to which the user wishes to move, and information relating to the current location (e.g., pose) of the surgical tool 22, the manipulator controller 54 determines the extent to which each of the plurality of links 58 needs to be moved in order to reposition the surgical tool 22 from the current location to the desired location. The data regarding where the plurality of links 58 are to be positioned is forwarded to joint motor controllers (not shown) (e.g., one for controlling each motor) that control the active joints of the manipulator 56 to move the plurality of links 58 and thereby move the surgical tool 22 from the current location to the desired location.
A user control pendant assembly 60 may be used to interface with the manipulator controller 54 in the semi-autonomous mode and/or to switch between the free mode, haptic mode, semi-autonomous mode, service mode, and/or other modes. The user control pendant assembly 60 includes a processor or pendant controller 62. The pendant controller 62 may have a central processing unit (CPU) and/or other pendant processors, memory (not shown), and storage (not shown). The pendant controller 62 is in communication with the manipulator controller 54. The pendant controller 62 is also in communication with switches (not shown) associated with user controls such as buttons 64, 68, 70. The pendant processor could include one or more processors to transmit signals resulting from pressing of buttons 64, 68, 70 on the user control pendant assembly 60 to the manipulator controller 54. Once the practitioner is ready to begin autonomous advancement of the surgical tool 22, in the semi-autonomous mode, for example, the practitioner depresses button 64 (and may be required to hold down button 64 to continue autonomous operation). In some versions, based on the depression of buttons 68 and 70, a feed rate (e.g., velocity) of the working end of the surgical tool 22 may be controlled.
Referring to
The robotic system 10 may be employed to prepare the humerus H and a glenoid cavity G of a scapula S to receive the shoulder implant system 100. In this case, the shoulder implant system 100 comprises a humeral component 102 and a glenoid component 104. The humerus H is prepared by the robotic system 10 to receive the humeral component 102, which in some embodiments is stemless and the glenoid cavity G is prepared by the robotic system 10 to receive the glenoid component 104.
Virtual boundaries, pre-defined tool paths, and/or other autonomous movement instructions, that correspond to the desired placement of the humeral component 102 and the glenoid component 104 are created to control movement of the manipulator 56 so that the working end of the surgical tool 22 (e.g., bur, drill, saw) are controlled in a manner that ultimately places the components 102, 104 according to the user's plan. This may comprise ensuring during the surgical procedure that the surgical tool 22 (or cutting accessory attached to it) stays within a pre-defined cutting volume delineating the bounds of the material to be removed to receive the implant. This may also comprise, for example, ensuring during the surgical procedure that a trajectory of the surgical tool 22 is aligned with a desired pose of peg holes, that the trajectory of the surgical tool 22 is aligned with a desired pose of pilot holes for anchoring screws, and the like. This may further comprise ensuring that a plane of the surgical tool 22 (e.g., for a sagittal saw) is aligned with a desired pose of a planar resection.
The robotic system 10 and/or the user may pre-operatively plan the desired cutting volume, trajectories, planar cuts, etc. For example, the desired cutting volumes may simply correspond to the geometry of the implants being used. Furthermore, these cutting volumes may be virtually located and registered to the anatomy by virtue of the user planning the location of the implants relative to the 3-D models of the humerus H and scapula S and registering the 3-D models of the implants, along with the 3-D models of the humerus H and the scapula S to the actual humerus H and scapula S during the procedure.
The robotic system 10 and/or the user may also intra-operatively plan the desired cutting volume, trajectories, planar cuts, etc. or may intra-operatively adjust the cutting volumes, trajectories, planar cuts, etc. that were defined pre-operatively. For example, in the free mode, the user could position a drill or bur at a desired entry point relative to the anatomy of interest, e.g., the humerus, and orient the drill or bur until the display 28, 29 shows that the trajectory of a rotational axis of the drill or bur is in a desired orientation. Once the user is satisfied with the trajectory, the user provides input to the robotic system 10 to set this trajectory as the desired trajectory to be maintained during the procedure. The input could be provided via input devices such as the mouse, keyboard, touchscreen, push button, foot pedal, etc. coupled to the navigation controller 26 or the manipulator controller 54. This same procedure can be followed for the user to set a desired planar cut, etc. 3-D models of the cutting volumes, desired trajectory, desired planar cuts, etc. are stored in memory for retrieval during the procedure.
One or more boundaries used by the robotic system 10 could be defined by a navigation pointer 106 by touching anatomy of interest with the navigation pointer 106 and capturing associated points on the anatomy with the guidance station 20. For example, the navigation pointer 106 (
A line haptic object LH (see
Referring to
One of several options may be employed to determine the location of the resection of the humeral head HH, and by extension the location of the planar haptic object PH. In one case, a surgeon may prefer to make the resection along an anatomical neck AN. In this case, referring to
In order to define the resection of the humeral head HH, the user touches the tip 110 of the navigation pointer 106 to at least three locations along the anatomical neck AN, and the navigation controller 26 determines positions of these plurality of landmarks in a coordinate system registered to the humerus H (one or more coordinate systems may be employed). Once the positions of the landmarks are determined, the virtual resection plane can be defined as passing through each of the three points in the coordinate system. The location of the virtual resection plane defines a location of the planar haptic object PH shown in
Other methods of establishing the resection includes placing the resection plane at a predetermined angle (e.g., 135 degrees or other angle) with respect to a longitudinal axis MA of the humerus (e.g. relative to an intramedullary axis of the intramedullary canal) defined in the coordinate system. Yet another method of establishing the plane comprises selecting one or more landmarks on the humerus H, e.g., the greater tuberosity, lesser tuberosity, bicipital groove, and defining the resection based on the one or more landmarks, either alone, or in conjunction with the intramedullary axis MA of the intramedullary canal and/or in conjunction with an extramedullary axis or axis based on an outer shape of the humerus H.
Referring to
Referring to
Other methods of determining the location of the intramedullary axis MA are also contemplated. For instance, the navigation pointer 106 could be employed to locate certain anatomical landmarks on the patient that have a predetermined relationship to the intramedullary axis MA. In one embodiment, the navigation pointer 106 may comprise a needle sharp pointer tip able to penetrate soft tissue to contact an exterior surface of the humerus H at one or more locations (e.g., 3 or more locations) on the humerus H with the navigation controller 26 using these points to automatically establish a virtual location of the intramedullary axis MA. Landmarks on both ends of the humerus H, or on only the humeral head HH, could be touched with the tip of the navigation pointer 106 to establish the intramedullary axis MA. In many cases, the virtual intramedullary axis of the humerus H is established prior to resecting the humeral head HH.
Once the location of the intramedullary axis MA is determined in the desired coordinate system, the ultimate virtual resection (e.g., the virtual resection plane) may be based on the plane defined by an upper surface 113 of the stemmed implant component 111. In other words, the user may first virtually plan the surgery by locating the stemmed implant component 111 at a desired future location (e.g., position and/or orientation should the stemmed implant component 111 need to be used in a future revision surgery) relative to the pre-operative model and the virtual intramedullary axis MA. The robotic system 10 could then derive the virtual resection as simply being the virtual plane passing through the upper surface 113 relative to the 3-D model. The robotic system 10 could then be programmed to resect the humeral head HH based on this virtual resection plane by controlling a sagittal saw blade 112 as described below.
In some cases, the surgeon or other user may require guidance as to where to locate the stemmed implant component 111 along the intramedullary axis MA. Such guidance may be established based on anatomical landmarks associated with the humeral head HH. In one embodiment, the user determines a location of a first virtual resection object RO in the desired coordinate system that intersects the virtual intramedullary axis MA to establish an intersection point IP. The first virtual resection object RO may comprise a line, plane, or other form of virtual object that is utilized to determine the location of the intersection point IP. The first virtual resection object RO may be defined by the user touching the tip 110 of the navigation pointer 106 to at least three locations along the anatomical neck AN. The navigation controller 26 then determines positions of these plurality of landmarks in the coordinate system registered to the humerus H. Once the positions of the landmarks are determined, a virtual plane can be defined as passing through each of the three points in the coordinate system. A line in the plane oriented in the A-P direction that intersects the intramedullary axis MA can then be defined as the first virtual resection object RO, as shown in
With the intersection point IP established, the virtual resection can be defined by a virtual resection plane that passes through the intersection point IP, contains the first virtual resection object RO, and is orthogonal to the intramedullary axis MA in the A-P direction. However, this virtual resection plane may not be ideal for the stemmed implant component 111 owing to differences in the angle α of this virtual resection plane to the intramedullary axis MA and the angle of the upper surface 113 (and the associated upper surface plane) with respect to the intramedullary axis MA. In other words, if the stemmed implant component 111 is positioned with respect to the intramedullary axis MA so that a stem 115 of the stemmed implant component 111 lies along the intramedullary axis MA as needed to stay within the humeral canal and provide a stable fit therein, and the upper surface 113 in this position is unable to match the virtual resection plane that has been calculated, then the navigation controller 26 may adjust the virtual resection plane so that it matches the angle of the upper surface 113 or the navigation controller 26 may perform a best fit analysis of the two planes to create a new virtual resection plane. In this case, the navigation controller 26 may analyze the best fit adjustment of the location of the stemmed implant component 111 to ensure that the best fit does not virtually move the stem 115 outside of the humeral canal.
Once the resection location has been determined, the robotic system 10 stores the virtual resection object (e.g., the final virtual resection plane) to guide operation of the manipulator 56 and the surgical tool 22. As shown in
Visual feedback can additionally be provided on the displays 28, 29, which depict a representation of the saw blade 112 and a representation of the humerus H and updates in substantially real-time such representations so that the user and/or others can visualize movement of the saw blade 112 relative to the humerus H during resection. The user operates the saw blade 112 to finish the resection and ready the humerus H for further preparation to receive the humeral component 102. In some versions, the humeral head HH is manually resected using a conventional sagittal saw outfitted with a separate navigation tracker so that the user can visualize a location of the saw blade 112 relative to the desired resection on the displays 28, 29 while manually resecting the humeral head HH.
In some embodiments, before sawing commences, the robotic system 10 autonomously aligns the saw blade 112 with the desired resection plane. Such autonomous positioning may be initiated by the user pulling a trigger (not shown) on the surgical tool 22, or otherwise providing input to the robotic system 10 to start the autonomous movement. In some cases, a reference point RP of the surgical tool 22 is first brought to within a predefined distance of a starting point SP of the planar haptic object PH (such as within a predefined starting sphere as shown or starting box). Once the reference point RP is within the predefined distance of the starting point SP, then pulling the trigger (or alternatively pressing a foot pedal or actuating some other input) causes the manipulator 56 to autonomously align and position the saw blade 112 on the desired plane. Once the saw blade 112 is in the desired pose, the robotic system 10 may effectively hold the surgical tool 22 on the desired plane (i.e., within the planar haptic object PH) by tracking movement of the patient and autonomously adjusting the manipulator 56 as needed to keep the saw blade 112 on the desired trajectory/plane.
While the robotic system 10 holds the saw blade 112 on the desired plane, the user may then manually manipulate the surgical tool 22 to move (or cause movement of) the saw blade 112 within the planar haptic object PH toward the bone to resect the humeral head HH. In some cases, such as in the haptic mode, the robotic system 10 constrains the user's movement of the surgical tool 22 to stay in the planar haptic object PH by providing haptic feedback to the user should the user attempt to move the surgical tool 22 in a manner that deviates from the planar haptic object PH and the desired plane. If the user desires to return the manipulator 56 to a free mode, for unconstrained movement of the surgical tool 22, the user can then pull the surgical tool 22 back along the planar haptic object PH, away from the patient, until an exit point of the planar haptic object PH is reached.
Once the humeral head HH has been resected, the humerus H is ready to be further prepared for receiving the humeral component 102 of the shoulder implant system 100. In some embodiments, one or more virtual objects that extend below the virtual resection plane could be used by the manipulator controller 54 to define a volume of material to be removed from the humerus H to receive the humeral component 102. The manipulator controller 54 is configured to operate the manipulator 56 to control movement of a drill, bur, saw blade, or other cutting tool, based on the one or more virtual objects. The one or more virtual objects may be sized so that a distal portion of the volume of material to be removed from the humerus H extends below the anatomical neck AN of the humerus and terminates above a diaphysis DPH of the humerus H (see
Referring to
The humeral component 102 shown in
Base flange 124 includes at least one hole 134 extending from proximal end surface 128 to distal bone-engaging surface 130. The holes 134 are each adapted to receive a screw. In the illustrated embodiment, there are two holes 134 and two screws, although there can be more or fewer holes and/or screws. The screws may be variable angle locking screws capable of being inserted through holes 134 at variable angles, with the heads of the screws having locking threads to mate with corresponding locking threads in the holes. The screws may engage the bone to provide fixation of the distal body 120 in the bone. The screws may have varying lengths to accommodate bone purchase to help with fixation, although any combination of screw lengths may be appropriate.
The central anchor 126 is coupled to the base flange 124 at a first end and extends distally from the base flange 124 along the implant axis IA to a second end. In the illustrated embodiment, the central anchor 126 has a straight portion 136, which may be cylindrical, and a tapered portion 138, which may be conical or frustoconical. Tapered portion 138 is tapered along the implant axis IA so that the proximal end of the tapered portion 138 has a relatively large diameter, with the diameter of the central anchor 126 generally narrowing toward second end until the central anchor terminates in distal tip 140.
The distal body 120 may further define an opening 142. Opening 142 may extend distally along the implant axis IA from proximal end surface 128 of base flange 124. Opening 142 may extend partially or fully through the central anchor 126 along the implant axis IA or it may be shallow and extend only into base flange 124. The proximal body 122 has a hemispherical head 144 to provide an articulation surface for interfacing with a mating glenoid implant component described further below. A taper 146 extends distally and centrally from the head 144 to be received in the opening 142. The taper 146 may be placed within opening 142 and attached thereto, for example by threads, a taper lock such as a Morse taper, or the like. The proximal body 122 may be attached by any known securement means including screw or friction fit. The distal body 120 may include additional holes for use with insertion/extraction tools and/or for accepting sutures.
During preparation of the humerus H, one virtual object V1 may be sized and shaped to correspond to the anchor 126 to define the volume of material to be removed from the humerus H to receive the central anchor 126. In order to take full advantage of planning the location of the humeral component 102 of the shoulder implant system 100 so that a minimum amount of tissue is removed in the event of a revision surgery to remove the humeral component 102 and replace it with the stemmed implant component 111, the location of the virtual object V1 can be centered on the bore 117 (i.e., the virtual location of the bore 117 in the model). This way, the only tissue removed is tissue that would need to be removed for the stemmed implant component 111 during the revision surgery.
One or more secondary virtual objects V2 may be sized and shaped to correspond to pilot holes to be placed in the humerus H for the one or more locking screws. The secondary virtual objects V2 may comprise trajectories, such as line haptic objects LH. The secondary virtual objects V2 can similarly be located to intersect with portions of the stemmed implant component 111 as shown in
The one or more virtual objects are registered to the coordinate system to which the pre-operative model is registered (or are defined in the pre-operative model) to define one or more virtual cutting boundaries for the surgical tool 22 so that the user is limited from removing more material than needed to accurately position the humeral component 102 securely within the humerus H. As previously described, the manipulator 56 may be operated in the haptic mode during cutting to generate haptic feedback to the user based on a position of the surgical tool 22 relative to the virtual cutting boundaries. For example, the manipulator 56 may be controlled by the manipulator controller 54 to generate haptic feedback in response to the working end of the surgical tool 22 reaching or exceeding a virtual cutting boundary defined by the virtual objects.
Owing to the attachment of the tracker 44 to the humerus H, the location of the working end of the surgical tool 22 relative to the humerus H can be visualized on the displays 28, 29, along with a visualization of the virtual objects. For instance, isometric, side, top, cross-sectional, or other views of the humerus H may be displayed with graphical representations of the virtual objects overlaid on the representation of the humerus H. Similarly, a representation of the working end of the surgical tool 22 can be displayed in relation thereto and updated so that the user is able to visualize, in substantially real-time, a pose of the surgical tool 22 relative to the humerus H and the associated virtual cutting boundaries.
Referring to
In step 154, the resection of the humeral head HH is planned based on the location of the virtual intramedullary axis MA and the positions of the landmarks. For instance, the landmarks are used to establish the virtual resection plane that defines the intersection point IP as previously discussed, and then the virtual resection plane is modified to match the upper surface 113 of the stemmed implant component 111. In some cases, these merely comprises modifying the plane to create a new virtual resection plane orthogonal to the intramedullary axis MA in the A-P direction and oriented at an angle α that matches the angle formed by the upper surface 113 of the stemmed implant component 111 and the intramedullary axis MA when the stem 115 of the stemmed implant component 111 is properly aligned with the intramedullary axis MA. In some cases, the new virtual resection plane may also be constrained to pass through the same intersection point IP. The new virtual resection plane is defined in the desired coordinate system to control operation of the manipulator 54 and movement of a cutting tool, such as the saw blade 112 to resect the humeral head HH from the rest of the humerus H.
In step 156, one or more virtual objects V1, V2 are defined in the desired coordinate system to control operation of the manipulator 54 and movement of a cutting tool, such as a bur to remove material from the humerus H to receive an implant, such as the distal body 120 of the humeral component 102. In steps 158 and 160, the cutting tool is tracked relative to movement of the humerus H. At the same time, the virtual objects V1, V2 define boundaries that constrain movement of the cutting tool relative to the humerus H. The manipulator 54 can then be operated in one or more of the modes described herein to remove tissue from the humerus H to receive the distal body 120 in step 162.
Referring to
Referring to
Owing to the attachment of the tracker 46 to the scapula S, the location of the working end of the surgical tool 22 relative to the glenoid cavity G can be visualized on the displays 28, 29, along with a visualization of the virtual object, such as the line haptic object LH. For instance, isometric, side, top, cross-sectional, or other views of a representation of the glenoid cavity G may be displayed with virtual representations of the line haptic object LH overlaid on the representation of the glenoid cavity G. Similarly, a representation of the working end of the surgical tool 22 can be displayed in relation thereto and updated so that the user is able to visualize, in substantially real-time, a pose of the surgical tool 22 relative to the glenoid cavity G and the associated virtual line haptic object LH, which also defines a virtual cutting boundary for the surgical tool 22.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Several embodiments have been discussed in the foregoing description. However, the embodiments discussed herein are not intended to be exhaustive or limit the invention to any particular form. The terminology which has been used is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings and the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/582,620, filed on Nov. 7, 2017, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5824085 | Sahay et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6002859 | DiGioia, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36974 | Bonutti | Nov 2000 | E |
6205411 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6500195 | Bonutti | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6702821 | Bonutti | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6770078 | Bonutti | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7104996 | Bonutti | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7206626 | Quaid, III | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7468075 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510557 | Bonutti | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7534263 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7615054 | Bonutti | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7618451 | Berez et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635390 | Bonutti | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7708740 | Bonutti | May 2010 | B1 |
7708741 | Bonutti | May 2010 | B1 |
7725162 | Malackowski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7747311 | Quaid, III | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749229 | Bonutti | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7806896 | Bonutti | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7806897 | Bonutti | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7828852 | Bonutti | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831292 | Quaid et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837736 | Bonutti | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7892236 | Bonutti | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7931690 | Bonutti | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7959635 | Bonutti | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7981158 | Fitz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010180 | Quaid et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8014984 | Iannotti et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8066708 | Lang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083745 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095200 | Quaid, III | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105330 | Fitz et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8122582 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133229 | Bonutti | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8234097 | Steines et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8277454 | Neubauer et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287522 | Moses et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8337501 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337507 | Lang et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337508 | Lavallee et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343218 | Lang et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361163 | Quaid | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366771 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8377129 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380471 | Iannotti et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8391954 | Quaid, III | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8425522 | Bonutti | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8439926 | Bojarski et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8439978 | Ebbitt | May 2013 | B2 |
8457719 | Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460304 | Fitz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480754 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8498744 | Odermatt et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500740 | Bojarski et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529630 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551099 | Lang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551102 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551103 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551169 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556906 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556907 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556971 | Lang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556983 | Bojarski et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561278 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562611 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562618 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568479 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568480 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8585708 | Fitz et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8617172 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623026 | Wong et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8623030 | Bonutti | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632552 | Bonutti | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641660 | Bonutti et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8641716 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8641726 | Bonutti | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657827 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8690945 | Fitz et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8709016 | Park et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731885 | Annotti et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753346 | Suarez et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768028 | Lang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8771365 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784495 | Bonutti | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801719 | Park et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8801720 | Park et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8834490 | Bonutti | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840629 | Bonutti | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858557 | Bonutti | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8882779 | Park et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8906107 | Bojarski et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8911499 | Quaid et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926706 | Bojarski et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8936596 | Mittelstadt et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8951259 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8974539 | Bojarski et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977021 | Kang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8979859 | Leparmentier et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992542 | Hagag et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998915 | Fitz et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9002426 | Quaid et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9008757 | Wu | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020788 | Lang et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023050 | Lang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9055953 | Lang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060797 | Bonutti | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066728 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072531 | Fitz et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9084617 | Lang et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095353 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9101394 | Arata et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9101443 | Bonutti | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9107679 | Lang et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9107680 | Fitz et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9113921 | Lang et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119655 | Bowling et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9125672 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9125673 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9125753 | Caballes | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9131597 | Taft et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149281 | Bonutti | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9155544 | Bonutti | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9186161 | Lang et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9192395 | Bonutti | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9192459 | Bonutti | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9216025 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9220510 | Cheal et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9220516 | Lang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9220517 | Lang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226828 | Bonutti | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241724 | Lang et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9241725 | Lang et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9265509 | Park et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9271766 | Bonutti | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9275192 | Kang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289264 | Iorgulescu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9292657 | Kang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295481 | Fitz et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295482 | Fitz et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9308005 | Fitz et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9308053 | Bojarski et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9314256 | Fitz et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9320620 | Bojarski et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9326780 | Wong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358018 | Fitz et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9364291 | Bellettre et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9375222 | Fitz et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9381025 | Fitz et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9381085 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9387079 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9402726 | Linderman et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9408615 | Fitz et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9439767 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9474847 | Bonutti et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486227 | Bonutti | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9492237 | Kang et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9495483 | Steines et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9545268 | Bonutti | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9579110 | Bojarski et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9579129 | Bonutti | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585725 | Bonutti | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9588587 | Otto et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9597157 | Hagag et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9603711 | Bojarski et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9610084 | Walker | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629687 | Bonutti | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636185 | Quaid et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9655683 | Iorgulescu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9665686 | Vorhis et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9687308 | Windolf et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20030055502 | Lang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060089646 | Bonutti | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060142657 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070066917 | Hodorek et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070179626 | Barrera et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070282450 | Habermeyer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004633 | Arata et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010705 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058945 | Hajaj et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090000626 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012532 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090157192 | Stuart | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100106194 | Bonutti et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100153081 | Bellettre et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100217400 | Nortman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100329530 | Lang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110060375 | Bonutti | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071528 | Carson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071529 | Carson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071530 | Carson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071531 | Carson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071532 | Carson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071645 | Bojarski et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082587 | Ziaei et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110213374 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213377 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213428 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213429 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238073 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110313423 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010623 | Bonutti | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120066892 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071883 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109150 | Quaid et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109152 | Quaid, III | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191205 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191420 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197408 | Lang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215226 | Bonutti | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226198 | Carson | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226481 | Carson | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245699 | Lang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120310617 | Bellettre et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130103363 | Lang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110471 | Lang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130211531 | Steines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226185 | Bonutti | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130237989 | Bonutti | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130238039 | Bonutti | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245803 | Lang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130289729 | Bonutti | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140005792 | Lang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031826 | Bojarski et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066959 | Bonutti | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140142710 | Lang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140188134 | Nortman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140188240 | Lang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140194989 | Bonutti | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200621 | Malackowski et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140228860 | Steines et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140309560 | Bonutti | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330278 | Park et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330279 | Park et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150032217 | Bojarski et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150185846 | Otto | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150250597 | Lang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150257768 | Bonutti | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150320500 | Lightcap et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150335444 | Caballes | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160015466 | Park et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030126 | Netravali et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038243 | Miller et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038244 | Netravali et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038291 | Netravali et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160074124 | Fitz et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081758 | Bonutti | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095609 | Park et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160143744 | Bojarski et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160143749 | Holovacs et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160175054 | Kang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199136 | Iorgulescu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206331 | Fitz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206375 | Abbasi et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206377 | Cheal et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160228193 | Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160228204 | Quaid et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160242931 | Wong et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160262910 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160310282 | Bojarski et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160317312 | Bojarski et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160324581 | Bojarski et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331467 | Slamin et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331481 | Bonutti | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160374693 | Van Citters et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170000562 | Frank et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007275 | Park et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007331 | Couture et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007408 | Fitz et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170020613 | Kang et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049487 | Bonutti et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170056022 | Cheal et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170056183 | Steines et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065347 | Bojarski et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079803 | Lang | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170119531 | Bojarski et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151021 | Quaid, III | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170164957 | Bojarski et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172665 | Otto et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170181755 | Librot | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170181798 | Panescu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189203 | Hagag et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180271667 | Kemp et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0176711 | Apr 1986 | EP |
2009057964 | May 2009 | WO |
2010068212 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010068213 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2016094298 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016115306 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016115423 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Arthrex, Inc., “Partial Eclipse Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty Brochure”, 2016, 12 pages. |
Arthrex, Inc., “Patient's Guide to Shoulder Replacement Surgery with the Arthrex Eclipse and Univers II Brochure”, 2015, 12 pages. |
Biomet Orthopedics, “Comprehensive Nano Stemless Shoulder Anatomic and Reverse Brochure”, 2012, 60 pages. |
Biomet Orthopedics, “T.E.S.S. Shoulder System Surgical Technique Brochure”, 2011, 43 pages. |
Casagrande Md, Danielle J. et al., “Radiographic Evaluation of Short-Stem Press-Fit Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Short-Term Follow-Up”, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 25, Issue 7, Jul. 2016, pp. 1163-1169. |
Choi et al., “Visbone: 3D Visualization of Bone Mineral Density”, Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Computer Society, 1999, pp. 138-146. |
Costouros, Md Facs, John G., “Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty Presentation”, 2017, 41 pages. |
FX Solutions, “Easytech Anatomical Surgical Technique Brochure”, 2016, 8 pages. |
Harmer, L. et al., “Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Are the Humeral Components Getting Shorter?”, Curr. Rev. Muscuskelet. Med., vol. 9, Issue 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 17-22. |
Lima Corporate, “SMR System Surgical Technique Brochure”, 2015, 62 pages. |
Mathys European Orthopaedics, Affinis Short—Short Stemmed Total Shoulder Prosthesis Brochure, 2016, 28 pages. |
Nguyen, Duong et al., “Improved Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Glenoid Implantation in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An In-Vitro Randomized Controlled Trial”, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 18, 2009, pp. 907-914. |
Pandey, Rupesh Kumar et al., “Drilling of Bone: A Comprehensive Review”, Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, vol. 4, 2013, pp. 15-30. |
Schnetzke, M. et al., “Radiologic Bone Adaptations on a Cementless Short-Stem Shoulder Prosthesis”, J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., vol. 25, Issue 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 650-657. |
Stryker, “Reunion TSA—Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System-Operative Technique”, Sep. 2016, pp. 1-88. |
Wright, “Tomier Simpliciti Shoulder System Surgical Technique Brochure”, 2016, 24 pages. |
Zimmer Biomet, “Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder Brochure”, Jan. 2018, 40 pages. |
Atmani, H. et al., “Computer-Aided Surgery System for Shoulder Prosthesis Placement”, Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 60-70. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190142518 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62582620 | Nov 2017 | US |