The present invention relates to a charged-particle microscope that scans the surface of a sample, more particularly to a scanning charged-particle microscope that enables both focal depth and resolution to be improved at the same time.
The scanning electron microscope (hereinafter referred to as SEM), which is one type of electron microscope, is an observation apparatus that, as disclosed in, for example, Japanese Application Patent Laid-Open Publication No. Hei05-94798, enables the surface shape of a sample to be displayed on an image display unit (for example, a CRT monitor) by focusing through an electromagnetic lens and the like the electron beam emitted from the electron gun inside, then scanning this electron beam in two-dimensional form on the sample, and detecting the secondary charged particles emitted from the sample.
The surface of the sample to be observed using SEM is usually not uniform. For a semiconductor device, for example, humps such as wiring, and recesses such as contact holes, are present in mixed form on the device. To obtain a clear image of such a sample, it is necessary that the diameter, dp, of the electron beam should be equal to or less than image resolution and that such a status should be maintained over the entire observation region. That is to say, the differences in level between the humps and recesses formed in the observation region need to stay within the focal depth, DF, of SEM.
The focal depth, DF, can be approximately represented using the following expression:
DF=dp/α (1)
where α is the half-opening angle of the beam.
For SEM, however, it is different to enlarge the focal depth, especially, during high-magnification observation, because, in the case of SEM, the electron beam needs to be focused into a probe shape for improved spatial resolution and the beam diameter, dp, cannot therefore be increased and because a decrease in the beam half-opening angle, a, may affect diffractive aberration.
Furthermore, lamination in a vertical direction in addition to mounting-density enhancement of two-dimensional circuit elements has come to be demanded towards recent semiconductor devices in order to achieve a higher degree of integration. In the case of SEM, which is intended to observe high-density semiconductor devices, although the beam diameter, dp, needs to be reduced for enhancing the spatial resolution of the electron probe during high-magnification observation, since the focal depth is reduced by the relationship of calculation expression (1), the focus of the beam which has been focused on a contact hole deeply formed by lamination deflects at the bottom of the contact hole, with the result that the image of the sample becomes partly indistinct.
In other words, SEM has a contradictory relationship between the spatial resolution and focal depth of its electron probe, and this contradiction poses the problem that SEM cannot be applied to semiconductor devices particularly high in the degree of integration.
It is the object of the present invention to solve the above-mentioned problem and provide a scanning charged-particle microscope capable of achieving both the improvement of resolution and that of focal depth at the same time.
In order to fulfill the object described above, the present invention provides a scanning charged-particle microscope having
a charged-particle source,
a lens for focusing the charged-particle optical beam emitted from said charged-particle source, and
a scanning deflector for scanning said charged-particle optical beam in two-dimensional form on a sample,
wherein said scanning charged-particle microscope is characterized in that a passage aperture for limiting the passage of the charged-particle optical beam is located between the charged-particle source and said scanning deflector, and in that a member for limiting the passage of the charged-particle optical beam is provided at least in the center of said passage aperture.
[Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments]
The apparatus according to the present invention is intended to realize both the improvement of both electron beam spatial resolution and focal depth at the same time in the scanning electron microscope (SEM), one type of scanning charged-particle microscope. How the apparatus according to the present invention works is described below. Although the description below relates to SEM, the description can also be applied to an apparatus by which a positron beam having inverse positive polarity at the same weight as that of an electron is scanned on a sample.
Focal depth, as explained in expression (1), is represented as DF=dp/α, whereas the beam diameter, dp, is approximately represented by the following expression as the square root of the sum of squares between the Gaussian image size, dg, determined by the electron optical system, and the respective indistinctness levels (dd, dc, ds) of the beam due to diffractive aberration, chromatic aberration, and spherical aberration:
dp2=dg2+dd2+dc2+ds2 (2)
dg=Mo·ρ (3)
dd=0.6λ/α (4)
dc=Cc·(ΔE/E)α (5)
ds=(½)Cs·α3 (6)
where Mo is the magnification of the electron optical system, ρ is the size of the virtual light source of the electron gun, λ is the wavelength of the electron radiated, Cc and Cs are a chromatic aberration coefficient and a spherical aberration coefficient, respectively, E is an electron radiation energy level, and ΔE is the fluctuation spread of the electron radiation energy. A typical α-dependency curve of dp is shown as
The curve of dp has its minimum value in a region of α=αopt, and in this case, the maximum image resolution (spatial resolution) can be obtained. In a region of α<<αopt, there is the relationship that dp=dd, whereas in a region of α>>αopt, there is the relationship that dp=ds.
For example, when a semiconductor device high in the degree of integration is to be observed using an electron beam determined under such conditions as set forth above, since there is a contradictory relationship between the beam diameter, dp, and focal depth, DF, reduction in the beam diameter under fixed “α” conditions for the purpose of observing the microstructured semiconductor device results in the insufficiency of focal depth. In other words, even when focus is placed on the surface of a semiconductor device high in the degree of integration, the focus may shift at a section significantly different in level with respect to the corresponding surface, such as the bottom of a contact hole.
Also, although it seems possible, from expression (1), to increase DF by reducing α from αopt, since the relationship of dd∝1/α exists as can be seen from expression (4), dd increases and image resolution deteriorates.
The apparatus according to the present invention enables both the spatial resolution of an electron beam to be improved and its focal depth to be enlarged, and relates to a scanning electron microscope by which, during SEM observation of a semiconductor device particularly high in the degree of integration and significantly different in level, clear and sharp images of the sample can be obtained over the entire observation region (electron beam scanning region).
In this embodiment, in order to fulfill such an object, a plate-like annular aperture body with an aperture annularly formed therein (an aperture in the center of which is provided a member that limits the passage of the electron beam) is located between the electron source and scanning deflector of SEM to ensure that the electron beam that has passed through the aperture is focused in probe form and that the electron probe is two-dimensionally scanned using the above-mentioned scanning deflector.
Art relating to an electron beam apparatus equipped with an annular aperture plate is disclosed in, for example, Japanese Application Patent Laid-Open Publication Nos. Hei11-297610, 12454 (2000), and Sho48-85069. The art disclosed in the literature is intended to radiate an electron beam to a sample or mask and project the transmitted electron beam onto a phosphor plate or the sample. That is to say, the art is not such that the electron beam that has been passed through the annular aperture plate described below is focused into probe form by objective lenses with the view of scanning the corresponding electron probe on the sample.
Unlike the electron beam aligner or transmission-type electron microscope projecting an electron beam onto a sample or mask, in SEM that scans an electron beam, since its beam diameter determines the resolution for a high magnification, the beam diameter must be reduced to achieve high resolution. At the same time, however, to maintain high resolution always on the nonuniform surfaces of samples, it is necessary not only to reduce the beam diameter, but also to increase focal depth under the reduced status of the beam diameter.
However, as described earlier in this SPECIFICATION, there is a contradictory relationship between the beam diameter and focal depth, and it has thus been difficult to increase focal depth while at the same time reducing the beam diameter. With the apparatus according to the present invention, images of samples such as semiconductor devices high in the degree of three-dimensional integration can be observed at high resolution levels by satisfying the originally contradictory conditions mentioned above. The principles of the apparatus according to the invention are described below using drawings.
A schematic view of SEM equipped with a plate-like annular aperture body is shown as
If the parameter, β, that denotes the annulation level is defined as β=αb/αa, the aperture of β=0 is equivalent to a circular aperture. Aperture body 11 with annular aperture 12 and circular aperture 13 is shown in
A comparative example of the calculation curve for the transfer function (also called the response function), τ(υD), that is used as a criterion for evaluating the SEM optical systems whose β values are 0 and 0.6, is shown in
B=(¼)Cs·αa3 (4)
C=(½)Cc(ΔE/E)αa (5)
b=ρ/2 (6)
Typical calculation results obtained in the case that (C/D, b/D) takes values of (0, 0), (0.4, 0), and (0.4, 0.1) with respect to B/D=0, β=0, and β=0.6, are shown in
Next, calculation results on focal depth, Δz, are shown below. The standardized beam intensity distribution, i(z), on the optical path (z-axis) is shown in
Although the electron gun used in the embodiment set forth above is of the Schottky, a heating type (tungsten [W] hairpin) or an electric field emission type is likewise available as an electron gun suitable for an electron microscope (the electric field emission type is further divided into two subtypes:cold and hot). The characteristics of these electron guns (namely, luminance, the size, ρ, of a virtual light source, an energy spread, ΔE, and a beam current noise level) are shown in TABLE 2. In terms of the improvement effects that can be obtained by use of the annulation described above, electron guns small in ρ and ΔE, namely, the electric field emission type and Schottky type of electron guns are particularly excellent and this has also been confirmed experimentally.
The τ(υD) curves in
Although electron microscopes are evaluated in terms of characteristics such as image resolution, image quality, and focal depth, the weight attached to each characteristic differs according to the particular observation requirements. To meet various observation requirements, it is desirable that an aperture body having both a circular aperture and an annular aperture should be adopted. A movement feature not shown in the present embodiment is provided so that the above apertures are positioned on the passage route of the electron beam. In the apparatus according to the present embodiment, aperture body 11 having a circular aperture 13 adjacent to the annular aperture 12 shown in
First, (1) the position of the aperture body is adjusted beforehand within a plane parallel to the aperture body surface so that the centers of annular aperture 12 and circular aperture 13 almost align with the optical axis. Next, (2) the beam position correction data and scan image rotational correction data to be applied to the deflector in order to perform corrections for both the shift in position of the beam focused on the sample, and for any scan image rotational errors on the sample, between both apertures, are registered along with the above-mentioned amounts of position adjustment. During actual observation, (3) the appropriate data is retrieved from registered data so as to enable either aperture to be selected according to the particular requirements, and position setting of the apertures in the aperture body, the correction of the beam position, and the correction of scan image rotational errors are conducted.
Since the rate at which the electron beam passes through an annular aperture is smaller than that of a circular aperture, it is advisable to use circular apertures when priority is to be assigned to, for example, image contrast and brightness, or to use annular apertures when priority is to be assigned to image resolution during the imaging of samples. Also, since image observation at higher magnifications, in particular, requires higher image resolution, an easier-to-use scanning electron microscope can be supplied by providing the apparatus with such a sequence that enables automatic selection of a circular aperture or an annular aperture in synchronization with the selection of a low-magnification mode or a high-magnification mode.
In addition, for an apparatus having the ability to conduct multi-point observation on a semiconductor wafer, automatic multi-point observation based on the appropriate beam conditions can be implemented by adopting the configuration that permits the creation of a recipe which sets the annular aperture or the circular aperture, depending on the particular situation of the observation point.
The apparatus according to the present embodiment has a control unit and a display unit, and the control unit is further equipped with a storage medium which can contain the data required for such aperture selection as mentioned above, and for automatic selection of another optical apparatus, with the two selection functions being performed in accordance with the data stored within the corresponding storage medium.
Aperture body 11 in the embodiment described above is of a single-piece configuration. An embodiment using an aperture body of a two-piece configuration is described below using
The creation of the annular aperture body consists of three steps: step 1, in which the center of circular aperture A is located on the optical axis of the objective lens; step 2, in which two-dimensional scanning of electron beam 2 by use of an aligner 5 is conducted on the circular aperture A of circular aperture body 11A (see
Although the focusing point for the electron beam 2 scanned on circular aperture A in step 2 does not always need to be matched to the z-position of circular aperture A, it is desirable that the focusing point be matched to the z-position, because a sharper image of circular aperture A can be obtained in step 3 and because axial matching accuracy between circular aperture A and shielding disc 12b improves.
If the distance between circular aperture body 11A and shielding disc/large circular aperture body 11B is short enough and changes in beam diameter, associated with the divergence or focusing of the beam between both aperture bodies can be ignored, the size (radius) ratio between circular aperture A, shielding disc 12b, and large circular aperture C, that is to be used for calculating the annulation level, β, does not need to be adjusted. For example, for the formation of an annular aperture, if the radii of circular aperture A and shielding disc 12b are taken as ra and rb, respectively, the annulation level, β, is equal to rb/ra. However, the radius, r11a, of the aperture outer surface which forms shielding disc 12b is sufficiently great in comparison to ra.
Next, an embodiment using the aperture body 11 which requires the adjustment of the size (radius) of its aperture during the calculation of the annulation level, β, is shown in
β=rb/ra,11B=Krb/ra
where K, a size correction coefficient, is equal to ra/ra,11B and does not always become 1.
Although, in the configurations of aperture bodies 11 in
Also, although the apparatus according to this embodiment uses a secondary electron to create an image of a sample, the embodiment is not limited to such an application and can likewise be applied to an apparatus which uses a reflected electron to create an image of a sample. Next, an embodiment of an imaging method which uses an electron microscope characterized in that the electron microscope images D and E obtained when the above-described apertures according to the present invention are a circular aperture and an annular aperture can be photographed and then after a new microscope image F has been created from both images, this new image can be displayed, is described using
The summation-based image F has the features that this image, is one to two times improved over image C in terms of the contrast level of the high-frequency components in the υ≧υc region and that focal depth is improved by several tens of percent. In addition, image resolution is improved by several percent. These improvement effects are described below from the viewpoint of the response function, τ(υD). Three types of curves . . . namely, τc(υD) and τA(υD) curves of the electron microscope images obtained when a circular aperture and an annular aperture were used, and τc+A(υD) curve of the electron microscope image corresponding to the summation-based image F created by low-pass filtering and high-pass filtering, are shown in
An example of an apparatus using a pupil of an annular shape in an imaging optical system is disclosed in Chapter 2 of “Optics of Ultrahigh-Image Resolution”, compiled by Satoshi Kawada and published in 1999 by the GAKKAI Publishing Center.
According to the present invention heretofore described, both the focal depth and resolution of a charged-particle microscope which scans the surface of a sample can be improved at the same time.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2000-316843 | Oct 2000 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3714422 | Hosoki et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3996468 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4608491 | Kokubo | Aug 1986 | A |
5866905 | Kakibayashi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5900629 | Todokoro et al. | May 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
48 85069 | Nov 1973 | JP |
5-94798 | Apr 1993 | JP |
A 5-258700 | Oct 1993 | JP |
A 8-17714 | Jan 1996 | JP |
A 8-138600 | May 1996 | JP |
A 11-186150 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-297610 | Oct 1999 | JP |
A 11-297610 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-012454 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-299081 | Oct 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020079448 A1 | Jun 2002 | US |