The present invention relates generally to semiconductor devices and more particularly to methods and systems for providing matched transistors.
Since semiconductor transistors were first implemented, there has been an on-going effort to reduce the area that individual transistors take up on an integrated circuit (i.e., “shrink” them), thereby allowing more transistors to fit on the integrated circuit. This trend is one factor that helps manufacturers to produce more powerful integrated circuits that have more functionality than previous generations. Indeed, this is one factor that has helped to usher in the communication age as we know it.
In addition to shrinking the area of individual transistors, in many applications designers also go to great lengths to match the characteristics of various transistors on a single integrated circuit. For example, designers often match transistors' geometries (i.e., layouts) so that the transistors experience similar electrical stresses with respect to surrounding devices. Depending on design constraints, designers may want to match the gains (β), currents delivered (IDS), voltage thresholds (VT), or other transistor characteristics of two or more transistors.
Accordingly, there is an on-going need for integrated circuits that strike a balance between minimal transistor area and precise matching.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of one or more aspects of the invention. This summary presents one or more concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later and is not an extensive overview of the invention. In this regard, the summary is not intended to identify key or critical elements of the invention, nor does the summary delineate the scope of the invention.
One embodiment of the invention relates to a semiconductor device formed over a semiconductor body. In this device, source and drain regions are formed in the body about lateral edges of a gate electrode and are separated from one another by a gate length. A channel region, which is configured to allow charged carriers to selectively flow between the source and drain regions during operation of the device, has differing widths under the gate electrode. These widths are generally perpendicular to the gate length. Other devices, methods, and systems are also disclosed.
The following description and annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects and implementations of the invention. These are indicative of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout, and wherein the illustrated structures and devices are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Referring now to
A gate-electrode 110, about which a source 112 and drain 114 are laterally disposed, overlies the substrate 102. Pocket implant regions 116, 118 can be formed near the lateral edges of the gate-electrode, where a bulk region 120 separates the pocket implants from one another. A dielectric layer 122 directly overlies the substrate 102, providing electrical isolation between the gate electrode 110 and a channel region in the body between the source 112 and drain 114.
Typically, the source and drain 112, 114 have a first conductivity type, while the bulk region 120 and pocket implant regions 116, 118 have a second conductivity type that is opposite to the first conductivity type. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the source and drain 112, 114 are p-type (highly doped P++), while the bulk region 120 and pocket implant regions 116, 118 are n-type (lightly doped N−, and highly doped N+, respectively). In such a configuration (i.e., a PMOS device), the substrate could be lightly doped p-type material (P−). As shown in
During operation, current selectively flows between the source and drain 112, 114 through the pocket implant regions 116, 118 and the bulk region 120 (i.e., through the channel region), depending on the bias applied to the device.
Referring now to
As the inventors have appreciated, the previously discussed conventional MOSFET transistor 100 is in some ways ill-suited for use in such an analog circuit 1700. More specifically, the inventors have appreciated that the pocket implant regions 116, 118 often act as a “blockade” to regulate the amount of current that actually flows through the device. Because the concentration of dopant atoms in the pocket implant regions 116, 118 is difficult to precisely control (e.g., due to statistical variations in the small number of atoms that make up the pocket region), the potential barriers associated with the pocket implant regions can vary widely from one transistor to another. This makes it difficult to precisely match one transistor to another, particularly at low overdrive (VGS−VT) values used to save headroom in analog circuits.
By analyzing the relative contributions of the bulk region 120 and pocket regions 116, 118 to matching in the device 100, the inventors have appreciated that the majority of the area in the bulk region 120 may be wasted in terms of the ability to match one transistor to another. The inventors have taken advantage of this realization by fashioning devices with “I-shaped” or “T-shaped” channel regions instead of more typical rectangular-shaped channel regions. These I-shaped or T-shaped channel regions could be achieved by forming correspondingly shaped isolation structures or by corresponding doping variations under the gate electrode. Some illustrative devices and methods are now set forth below.
Referring now to
The transistor 200 is formed within an isolation trench 218 that defines an I-shaped isolated region 220 in the semiconductor body 102. This isolated region 220 includes the I-shaped bulk region 216 and the pocket implant regions 212, 214, where different widths are associated therewith. One can see that the I-shaped bulk region 216, which may also be referred to as a first region in some embodiments, has various widths w1, w2, w3 under the gate 206. In the illustrated embodiment, width w1 is measured between a pair of opposing sidewalls 216A, 216B, w2 is measured between opposing sidewalls 210A, 210B, and w3 is measured between opposing sidewalls 208A, 208B. All of these sidewalls are adjacent to the isolation trench 218.
Often, the pocket implant regions do not coincide precisely with the relatively wide regions of the I-shaped bulk region. Rather, the relatively wide regions typically extend further under the gate than the pocket implants to avoid current crowding.
In various embodiments where the device 200 is used in an analog manner, this width w1 could typically be less than the gate length L. For example, width w1 could be less than the gate length L by a factor of approximately 1 to approximately 50. The drain 210 and source 208, which in some embodiments may be referred to as a second region and third region, respectively, have a second width w2 and a third width w3 respectively. In the I-beam configuration 200, the second and third widths w2, w3 are approximately equal to one another and are greater than the first width w1. However, in other embodiments (e.g., in a T-shaped configuration discussed below), these widths w2, w3 could differ from one another.
In one embodiment, these widths w1, w2, w3, can be tailored such that two matched transistors in separate isolation structures are optimally matched to one another, while they also take up a minimal area on the integrated circuit. In effect, this configuration allows a designer to “shrink” a rectangular-shaped device without sacrificing quality of matching. For example, in one embodiment, a designer may want the matching precision of a rectangular-shaped MOSFET having a length of 20 um and a width of 2 um, but cannot tolerate the large area (i.e., at least 20 um*2 um=40 um2) required for such a device. Thus, the designer could use an I-shaped MOSFET where the pocket regions have lengths L2=L3=(about 0.5 um) and widths w2=w3=(about 2 um). The designer could use a bulk region with a total length (L−L2−L3)=(about 2 um) and a width w1=(about 0.5 um). Thus, the I-shaped device with similar matching characteristics would have an active area of about (2×(2 um×0.5 um)+(0.2 um*2 um)=2.4 um2), in other words consuming a rectangular area of (0.5 um+2 um+0.5 um)*2 um=6 um2. Thus, the I-shaped device results in a significant reduction in area in comparison to a rectangular-shaped device. Of course, these values are only illustrative and it will be appreciated that the lengths and widths of transistors in accordance with the invention could vary widely from those set forth here.
As shown in
Referring now to
The T-shaped transistors may be advantageous in that they can be tiled together in an inter-digitated configuration 400 as shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In
In
In
In
In
Referring now to
The layout dimensions of studied in
Four mismatch parameters were analyzed for each device style. More precisely,
Although matched transistors (e.g., transistors 200, 300) and methods for performing operations thereon have been illustrated and described, alterations and/or modifications may be made to these examples. For example, although transistor 200 has been shown as having an n-type bulk region, a p-type source, and a p-type drain (i.e., a PMOS device); in other embodiments the doping conventions could be reversed. For example, the bulk region could be p-type, and the source and drain could be n-type (i.e., an NMOS device). Alternatively, the present invention could be used with an NMOS device that is placed with a p-well or a shallow p-well as the body, such that the body is contained within a deep n-well, isolating the body from a p-type substrate.
Although as described herein, the terms “first region” and “first width” were used to describe a bulk region in one embodiment, these terms also include other structures. For example, these terms could also relate to the source, drain, or pocket implant regions, or they could relate to other structures in other devices (e.g., bipolar transistors). Similarly, the terms “second region”, “second width”, “third region”, “third width”, “fourth region”, “fourth width”, and other related terms could include any other structures and should not be limited to those structures described above. In various embodiments, these regions could be defined without using a shallow trench isolation structure. For example, the first and second regions could be achieved by doping variations or other manners of differentiating between regions.
Although the invention has been illustrated and described with respect to one or more implementations, alterations and/or modifications may be made to the illustrated examples without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components or structures (assemblies, devices, circuits, systems, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component or structure which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary implementations of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”.
This application claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/948,172 filed Nov. 30, 2007, entitled “MATCHED ANALOG TRANSISTORS WITH EXTENSION WELLS.”