1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a semiconductor integrated circuit including an MOS transistor, in particular, to a technique effectively applied to a layout structure in consideration of a transistor characteristic varying depending on a stress-strain applied by a shallow trench isolation (STI).
2. Description of the Related Art
With the recent miniaturization of a transistor, an STI structure has been widely used as a technique of isolating MOS transistors from each other. In a CMOS device fabricated by a refined process, a phenomenon that the MOS transistor demonstrates a variation in a threshold voltage, current drivability, and the like under a stress applied by the STI has been confirmed. In particular, for the CMOS device including a plurality of transistors in a predetermined region surrounded by the STI, the stress applied by the STI is varied for each of the plurality of transistors depending on the position of the transistor in the predetermined region. More specifically, because a diffusion area, a gate, or the like has an irregular pattern in an end area of the predetermined region, the transistor is more remarkably affected by the stress from the STI as compared with that in a central area. With an increase in the degree of integration and miniaturization, less suppression of the variation is requested.
The relation between the STI structure and the transistor characteristic is described in, for example, the following patent publications.
First, Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2006-190727 (hereinafter, referred to as Patent Document 1) describes a variation in effect of a stress generated in an STI structure on each of a P-channel transistor and an N-channel transistor. The stress is applied by the STI to a device active region in a compression direction. As a result, an electron mobility decreases, whereas a hole mobility increases. In view of the problem, Patent Document 1 discloses that full (100%) transistor performance (Ids characteristic) can be obtained by increasing a distance from a device isolation region to a channel region in a gate length direction in the N-channel transistor.
Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2005-101453 (hereinafter, referred to as Patent Document 2) discloses a semiconductor device including an extra dummy cell region provided in an outer peripheral area of a memory cell array so as to absorb a variation in processing size of the other cells.
Furthermore, Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2002-76148 (hereinafter, referred to as Patent Document 3) discloses a technique of reducing a variation in size of a memory cell array in a non-volatile memory in the following manner. A width of a device isolation region and an interval between floating gates are increased only in a boundary area between an end area of a memory cell array and an inner area of the memory cell array. In addition, a width of a device region is increased only in the end area of the memory cell array.
The above description is summarized as follows. According to Patent Documents 1 and 3, an area of each of outermost cells 2 is increased in directions as indicated with arrows as compared with an inner cell 1 in an array 3, as illustrated in
According to Patent Documents 1 and 3, however, a device region in the end area of the array is increased to correspondingly increase a chip size. Similarly, in Patent Document 2, the dummy region is required to be provided in the end area of the array, which prevents a chip-size reduction from being achieved.
In view of the above-described problems, the present invention has an object of providing a semiconductor integrated circuit including an array of a plurality of unit cells, each including a transistor and a device isolation, and a device isolation surrounding the array. The shape of a predetermined transistor in each of the unit cells situated close to the device isolation is adjusted according to a stress applied by the device isolation (STI) to reduce a variation in transistor performance of the whole array.
More preferably, a channel length or a channel width of each of the predetermined transistors is adjusted in a direction which allows the performance of a P-channel transistor to be decreased and the performance of an N-channel transistor to be enhanced.
Furthermore, for a transistor situated at the corner of the array, the amount of adjustment is more increased as compared with that for the other outermost transistors.
As described above, even if the stress by the STI varies the characteristic of each of the transistors in the individual unit cell, the shape of each of the transistors is optimized in each of the transistors according to the stress applied by the STI. Therefore, an electrical characteristic of the transistors does not vary as the whole array.
As described above, according to the present invention, a variation in transistor between unit blocks arranged in an array, each having the same layout pattern, can be suppressed.
In addition, a chip area can be reduced without increasing a distance from the STI to an active region nor providing a dummy region.
In the accompanying drawings:
In order to further clarify the above and other objects, features, and effects of the present invention, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail referring to the accompanying drawings.
For a further detailed description,
As can be seen from
For a more specific description of this first embodiment, a structure of the unit cell 20, specifically, an SRAM cell including six transistors, will be described referring to
Although the channel width of each of the transistors TN2 and TP2 is not changed in this embodiment, it is likely that even the channel widths of the transistors TN2 and TP2 must be changed according to the stress from the STI. The resizing of the transistors TN1, TN3 and TN4 is as described above. Even for the relationship between transistors TN3 and TN4, however, the transistor TN3 is stressed by the STI from left in the gate width direction in
A final form of the unit cell according to this embodiment will be briefly described as a supplemental explanation, referring to
A more specific description will be given referring to
Although the channel lengths of the transistors TN2 and TP2 are not changed in this second embodiment as in the case of the first embodiment, it is likely that the channel lengths of the transistors TN2 and TP2 must be changed according to the stress from the STI. The resizing of the transistors TN1, TN3 and TN4 is as described above. Even for the relationship between transistors TN3 and TN4, however, the resizing of the transistors TN3 and TN4 according to a difference in the direction of the applied stress is well conceivable.
It is apparent that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments and each of the embodiments can be appropriately changed within the scope of the technical idea of the present invention. For example, the first and second embodiments can be combined. Specifically, according to the stress from the STI, it is possible to change the channel length of the N-channel transistor and the channel width of the P-channel transistor.
In the embodiments of the present invention, the SRAM cell has been described as an example of the content of the unit cell. However, the content of the unit cell is not limited thereto. A DRAM cell or a non-volatile memory cell may also be used as the content of the unit cell. Furthermore, a logic circuit element such as an inverter, which is repeatedly arranged, or a transistor itself may be used as the content of the unit cell. Specifically, the present invention is applicable to the case where multiple elements (group), each having the same shape and function, are arranged in an array.
Therefore, although the element at the corner, which is the most strongly affected by the STI, is the N-channel transistor in the embodiments of the present invention, the element at the corner is not limited thereto. It is apparent that the element at the corner may also be the P-channel transistor.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007-057119 | Mar 2007 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6320223 | Hueting et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6531357 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6891761 | Kumagai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6924560 | Wang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7032194 | Hsueh et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7093215 | Sahara et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109568 | Kumagai et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7205617 | Ohta et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20060145266 | Zushi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070007617 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070164317 | Nakanishi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-76148 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2005-101453 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-190727 | Jul 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080217704 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |