Shielded probe for testing a device under test

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7057404
  • Patent Number
    7,057,404
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 23, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 6, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
A probe measurement system for measuring the electrical characteristics of integrated circuits or other microelectronic devices at high frequencies. The probe measurement system preferably includes a probe having a conductive path between the first and second sides of a substrate and a probe contact electrically connected to the conductive path.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to probe measurement systems for measuring the electrical characteristics of integrated circuits or other microelectronic devices at high frequencies.


There are many types of probing assemblies that have been developed for the measurement of integrated circuits and other forms of microelectronic devices. One representative type of assembly uses a circuit card on which the upper side are formed elongate conductive traces that serve as signal and ground lines. A central opening is formed in the card, and a needle-like probe tip is attached to the end of each signal trace adjacent the opening so that a radially extending array of downwardly converging needle-like tips is presented by the assembly for selective connection with the closely spaced pads of the microelectronic device being tested. A probe assembly of this type is shown, for example, in Harmon U.S. Pat. No. 3,445,770. This type of probing assembly, however, is unsuitable for use at higher frequencies, including microwave frequencies in the gigahertz range, because at such frequencies the needle-like tips act as inductive elements and because there are no adjoining elements present to suitably counteract this inductance with a capacitive effect in a manner that would create a broadband characteristic of more or less resistive effect. Accordingly, a probing assembly of the type just described is unsuitable for use at microwave frequencies due to the high levels of signal reflection and substantial inductive losses that occur at the needle-like probe tips.


In order to obtain device measurements at somewhat higher frequencies than are possible with the basic probe card system described above, various related probing systems have been developed. Such systems are shown, for example, in Evans U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,728; Kikuchi Japanese Publication No. 1-209,380; Sang et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,749,942; Lao et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,593,243; and Shahriary U.S. Pat. No. 4,727,319. Yet another related system is shown in Kawanabe Japanese Publication No. 60-223,138 which describes a probe assembly having needle-like tips where the tips extend from a coaxial cable-like structure instead of a probe card. A common feature of each of these systems is that the length of the isolated portion of each needle-like probe tip is limited to the region immediately surrounding the device-under-test in order to minimize the region of discontinuity and the amount of inductive loss. However, this approach has resulted in only limited improvement in higher frequency performance due to various practical limitations in the construction of these types of probes. In Lao et al., for example, the length of each needle-like tip is minimized by using a wide conductive blade to span the distance between each tip and the supporting probe card, and these blades, in turn, are designed to be arranged relative to each other so as to form transmission line structures of stripline type. As a practical matter, however, it is difficult to join the thin vertical edge of each blade to the corresponding trace on the card while maintaining precisely the appropriate amount of face-to-face spacing between the blades and precisely the correct pitch between the ends of the needle-like probe tips.


One type of probing assembly that is capable of providing a controlled-impedance low-loss path between its input terminal and the probe tips is shown in Lockwood et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,697,143. In Lockwood et al., a ground-signal-ground arrangement of strip-like conductive traces is formed on the underside of an alumina substrate so as to form a coplanar transmission line on the substrate. At one end, each associated pair of ground traces and the corresponding interposed signal trace are connected to the outer conductor and the center conductor, respectively, of a coaxial cable connector. At the other end of these traces, areas of wear-resistant conductive material are provided in order to reliably establish electrical connection with the respective pads of the device to be tested. Layers of ferrite-containing microwave absorbing material are mounted about the substrate to absorb spurious microwave energy over a major portion of the length of each ground-signal-ground trace pattern. In accordance with this type of construction, a controlled high-frequency impedance (e.g., 50 ohms) can be presented at the probe tips to the device under test, and broadband signals that are within the range, for example, of DC to 18 gigahertz can travel with little loss from one end of the probe assembly to another along the coplanar transmission line formed by each ground-signal-ground trace pattern. The probing assembly shown in Lockwood et al. fails to provide satisfactory electrical performance at higher microwave frequencies and there is a need in microwave probing technology for compliance to adjust for uneven probing pads.


To achieve improved spatial conformance between the tip conductors of a probe and an array of non-planar device pads or surfaces, several high-frequency probing assemblies have been developed. Such assemblies are described, for example, in Drake et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,894,612; Coberly et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,523; and Boll et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,964. The Drake et al. probing assembly includes a substrate on the underside of which are formed a plurality of conductive traces which collectively form a coplanar transmission line. However, in one embodiment shown in Drake et al., the tip end of the substrate is notched so that each trace extends to the end of a separate tooth and the substrate is made of moderately flexible nonceramic material. The moderately flexible substrate permits, at least to a limited extent, independent flexure of each tooth relative to the other teeth so as to enable spatial conformance of the trace ends to slightly non-planar contact surfaces on a device-under-test. However, the Drake et al. probing assembly has insufficient performance at high frequencies.


With respect to the probing assembly shown in Boll et al., as cited above, the ground conductors comprise a pair of leaf-spring members the rear portions of which are received into diametrically opposite slots formed on the end of a miniature coaxial cable for electrical connection with the cylindrical outer conductor of that cable. The center conductor of the cable is extended beyond the end of the cable (i.e., as defined by the ends of the outer conductor and the inner dielectric) and is gradually tapered to form a pin-like member having a rounded point. In accordance with this construction, the pin-like extension of the center conductor is disposed in spaced apart generally centered position between the respective forward portions of the leaf-spring members and thereby forms, in combination with these leaf-spring members, a rough approximation to a ground-signal-ground coplanar transmission line structure. The advantage of this particular construction is that the pin-like extension of the cable's center conductor and the respective forward portions of the leaf-spring members are each movable independently of each other so that the ends of these respective members are able to establish spatially conforming contact with any non-planar contact areas on a device being tested. On the other hand, the transverse-spacing between the pin-like member and the respective leaf-spring members will vary depending on how forcefully the ends of these members are urged against the contact pads of the device-under-test. In other words, the transmission characteristic of this probing structure, which is dependent on the spacing between the respective tip members, will vary in an ill-defined manner during each probing cycle, especially at high microwave frequencies.


Burr et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,788, disclose a microwave probe that includes a supporting section of a coaxial cable including an inner conductor coaxially surrounded by an outer conductor. A tip section of the microwave probe includes a central signal conductor and one or more ground conductors generally arranged normally in parallel relationship to each other along a common plane with the central signal conductor so as to form a controlled impedance structure. The signal conductor is electrically connected to the inner conductor and the ground conductors are electrically connected to the outer conductor, as shown in FIG. 1. A shield member is interconnected to the ground conductors and covers at least a portion of the signal conductor on the bottom side of the tip section. The shield member is tapered toward the tips with an opening for the tips of the conductive fingers. The signal conductor and the ground conductors each have an end portion extending beyond the shield member and the end portions are able to resiliently flex, despite the presence of the shielding member, relative to each other and away from their common plane so as to permit probing devices having non-planar surfaces.


In another embodiment, Burr et al. disclose a microwave probe that includes a supporting section of a coaxial cable including an inner conductor coaxially surrounded by an outer conductor, as shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C. A tip section of the microwave probe includes a signal line extending along the top side of a dielectric substrate connecting a probe finger with the inner conductor. A metallic shield may be affixed to the underside of the dielectric substrate and is electrically coupled to the outer metallic conductor. Ground-connected fingers are placed adjacent the signal line conductors and are connected to the metallic shield by way of vias through the dielectric substrate. The signal conductor is electrically connected to the inner conductor and the ground plane is electrically connected to the outer conductor. The signal conductor and the ground conductor fingers (connected to the shield via vias) each have an end portion extending beyond the shield member and the end portions are able to resiliently flex, despite the presence of the shielding member, relative to each other and away from their common plane so as to permit probing devices having non-planar surfaces. While the structures disclosed by Burr et al. are intended to provide uniform results of a wide frequency range, they unfortunately tend to have non-uniform response characteristics at high microwave frequencies.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an existing probe.



FIGS. 2A–2C illustrate another existing probe.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a probe.



FIG. 4 illustrates a side view of a portion of the probe of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 illustrates a bottom view of a portion of the probe of FIG. 3.



FIG. 6 illustrates another embodiment of a probe.



FIG. 7 illustrates yet another embodiment of a probe.



FIG. 8 illustrates still another embodiment of a probe.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present inventors considered the co-planar fingered probing devices disclosed by Burr et al., including the co-planar finger configuration and the microstrip configuration with fingers extending therefrom. In both cases, electromagnetic fields are created during probing between the fingers. These electromagnetic fields encircle each of the fingers, electrically couple the signal finger to the ground fingers, and electrically couple the ground fingers one another. While the probing device is being used for probing, the resulting electromagnetic fields surrounding the fingers interact with the wafer environment. While probing in different regions of the wafer, the interaction between the electromagnetic fields around the fingers and the wafer change, typically in an unknown manner. With a significant unknown change in the interaction it is difficult, if not impossible, to accurately calibrate out the environmental conditions while probing a device under test.


When multiple probes are being simultaneously used for probing the same area of the wafer, the probe tips come into close proximity with one another and result in additional coupling between the probes, normally referred to as cross-talk. In addition, the region between the support for the fingers, such as a dielectric substrate, and the extended portion of the fingers results in a significant capacitance, which impedes high frequency measurements.


The present inventors were surprised to determine that the microstrip structure disclosed by Burr et al. further does not calibrate well on calibration test substrates at very high frequencies, such as in excess of 70 GHz. This calibration is independent of potential interaction with a wafer at a later time during actual probing of a device under test. After examination of this unexpected non-calibration effect the present inventors speculate that an energy is created in an “undesired mode”, other than the dominant field modes, at such extreme frequencies. This “undesired mode” results in unexpected current leakages from the signal path thus degrading the signal integrity. The present inventors further speculate that this “undesired mode” involves resonating energy in the ground plane as a result of discontinuities in the ground path, including for example, the connection between the ground plane and the external portion of the cable, and the inductance in the ground plane. This ground plane resonant energy results in unpredictable changing of the energy in the signal path to the device under test, thus degrading performance. This degradation wasn't apparent at lower operating frequencies, so accordingly, there was no motivation to modify existing probe designs in order to eliminate or otherwise reduce its effects.


Referring to FIG. 3, a semi-rigid coaxial cable 40 is electrically connected at its rearward end to a connector (not shown). The coaxial cable 40 normally includes an inner conductor 41, a dielectric material 42, and an outer conductor 43. The coaxial cable 40 may likewise include other layers of materials, as desired. The forward end of the cable 40 preferably remains freely suspended and, in this condition, serves as a movable support for the probing end of the probe.


A microstrip style probe tip 80 includes a dielectric substrate 88 that is affixed to the end of the coaxial cable 40. The underside of the cable 40 is cut away to form a shelf 85, and the dielectric substrate 88 is affixed to the shelf 85. Alternatively, the dielectric substrate 88 may be supported by an upwardly facing shelf cut away from the cable or the end of the cable without a shelf. Referring also to FIG. 4, a conductive shield 90, which is preferably planar in nature, is affixed to the bottom of the substrate 88. The conductive shield 90, may be for example, a thin conductive material (or otherwise) that is affixed to the substrate 88. By using a generally planar conductive material having a low profile the shield 90 is less likely to interfere with the ability to effectively probe a device under test by accidently contacting the device under test. The conductive shield 90 is electrically coupled to the outer conductor 43 to form a ground plane. The other conductor 43 is typically connected to the ground, thought the outer conductor 43 may be provided with any suitable voltage potential (either DC or AC). The conductive shield 90 preferably covers all of the lower surface of the substrate 88. Alternatively, the conductive shield 90 may cover greater than 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and/or the region directly under a majority (or more) of the length of a conductive signal trace on the opposing side of the substrate 88.


One or more conductive signal traces 92 are supported by the upper surface of the substrate 88. The conductive traces 92, may be for example, deposited using any technique or otherwise supported by the upper surface of the substrate. The conductive trace(s) 92 is electrically interconnected to the inner conductor 41 of the coaxial cable 40. The inner conductor 41 of the coaxial cable 40 and the conductive trace(s) 92 normally carries the signal to and from the device under test. The conductive trace(s) 92 together with the shield layer 90 separated by a dielectric material 88 form one type of a microstrip transmission structure. Other layers above, below, and/or between the shield layer 90 and the conductive trace 92 may be included, if desired.


To reduce the effects of the aforementioned unexpected high frequency signal degradation, the present inventors determined that the signal path may include a conductive via 94 passing through the substrate 88. The conductive via 94 provides a manner of transferring the signal path from the upper surface of the substrate to the lower surface of the substrate. The conductive via 94 avoids the need for using a conductive finger extending out from the end of the substrate 88 that would otherwise result in a significant capacitance between the extended finger and the end of the substrate 88. The conductive via 94 provides a path from one side of the substrate 88 to the other side of the substrate 88 in a manner free from an air gap between the conductive via 94 and the substrate 88 for at least a majority of the thickness of the substrate 88. In addition, the shield layer 90 preferably extends beyond the via 94 to provide additional shielding.


Referring also to FIG. 5, the lower surface of the substrate 88 illustrates a contact bump 100 electrically connected to the via 94 and the trace 92 extending below the lower surface of the substrate 88 and the shield 90 which may be used to make contact with the device under test during probing. The conductive shield 90 may include an “patterned” section around the contact “bump” 100 so that the shield layer 90 and the signal path are free from being electrically interconnected (e.g., the shield layer 90 may be greater than 50%, 75%, or laterally surrounding all of the contact at some point). It is to be understood that the contact may take any suitable form, such as for example a bump, a patterned structure, a conductive structure, a needle structure, or an elongate conductor. The conductive shield 90 may laterally encircle the conductive bump which increases the resistance to external electromagnetic fields. Also, the conductive shield 90 extending beyond the conductive bump 100 reduces the crosstalk from other probes. For some probing applications, one or more shield 90 contacts 102 may be provided, if desired. The shield layer and the conductive trace are normally constructed to provide a microstrip transmission line controlled impedance structure. While typically the signal line has a test signal and the shield has a ground potential, the two conductive paths may likewise be any other configuration, such as balanced inputs which vary with respect to ground.


Referring to FIG. 6, the probe may employ an outer cone shaped upper shield 110. The outer conductor 43 of the coaxial cable is connected to the upper shield 110 is therefore electrically connected to ground. This design provides a smooth transition between the coaxial cable and the end of the probe. The probe is therefore shielded as it transitions to the tip of the cone portion.


The upper shield 110 has a tapered cylindrical portion whose forward end is a tapered tip and whose rear end has a contour that is in continuous contact with the outer coaxial conductor along its circumference so that there is no gap between the outer conductor and portions of the shield that could create fringing fields that could effect probe measurements. Likewise, anyother shape may be used for the shield 110, as desired. In addition, the forward end preferably extends past the via and forms a substantially closed region so that there is reduced fringing fields at the forward end. The shield reduces parasitic coupling to any external structure and the construction of the shield as a single piece of metal reduces complexity of assembly. The shield is preferably made of a thin foil and is capable of being formed by a fabrication process. The sheild may also be deposited or made of other material.


The lower shield member 90 extends underneath the conductive trace between the fingers and the chuck holding the device under test. The shield therefore helps to block the generation of ground plane resonant modes that can otherwise interfere with and degrade the signal from the device under test.


Referring to FIG. 7, in an alternative embodiment a conductive finger 112 or other elongate conductive element may be provided that is electrically interconnected to the via. One or more additional ground fingers 114 may be electrically connected to the lower shield material. If desired, each respective finger may include a cantilevered portion that extends down away from the substrate. The cantilevered portions are preferably arranged in transversely spaced apart relationship to each other so as to cooperatively form a controlled impedance transmission line in order that a low loss transition can be made between the respective conductors on the cable and the respective pads on the device-under test.


While the use of an upper shield 110 that includes a curved surface provides an improvement to signal integrity, the changes in the structure of the upper shield tend to introduce some limitations into the signal integrity at high frequencies, thus impeding performance. For example, the changes in the height of the upper shield changes the electromagnetic field pattern along the length of the signal conductor. In addition, increased manufacturing complexity occurs with the upper shield. Furthermore, in most cases microwave microstrip transmission structures are enclosed in a housing, such as a conductive case, and accordingly there is reduced motivation to include an upper shield structure.


To further increase the performance at high frequencies the present inventors considered the effects of the substrate material. In many cases the dielectric constant of the dielectric substrate material is high, such as Al2O3 which has a 9.9 dielectric constant. Materials with a high dielectric constant have a tendency to concentrate the electromagnetic fields therein, thus decreasing the electromagnetic fields susceptible to influence by other devices. In addition, the thickness of the substrate is typically 250–500 microns to provide mechanical stability. Thus the fields tend to concentrate within the substrate.


Referring to FIG. 8, while considering such substrates the present inventors came to the realization that the flexible membrane substrate may be substituted for the more rigid substrate 88. An example of membrane material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,613, incorporated by reference herein together will all other references cited herein incorporated by reference herein. In general, membrane based probes are characterized by a flexible (or semi-flexible) substrate with traces supported thereon together with contacting portions being supported thereon. The membrane portion of the probe may be constructed from a sacrificial substrate into which is created a depression. Into this depression is located conductive material, traces are located thereon if desired, and flexible dielectric material is located on or under the traces. Thereafter, the sacrificial substrate is removed leaving the probe tip, traces, and membrane material. The contacting portions come into contact with the device under test and the traces are normally on the opposing side of the membrane connected to the contacting portions using vias. In many cases, the membrane technology may be significantly thinner than ceramic based substrates, (see, e.g., substrate 88) such as 40, 30, 20, 10, 5, or 3 microns or less. Normally the dielectric constant of the membrane material is 7 or less, sometimes less than 6, 5, or 4 depending on the particular material used. While normally using a lower dielectric constant substrate is unsuitable, using a significantly thinner substrate together with a lower dielectric constant substrate raises the theoretical frequency range of effective signal transmission to 100's of GHz. The significantly thinner substrate material permits positioning the lower shield material significantly closer to the signal traces than the relatively thick ceramic substrate, and therefore tends to more tightly confine the electromagnetic fields there between. With a tight confinement of the electric fields in the membrane material, the present inventors determined that the high frequency performance of the membrane material may be increased by locating an upper shield material above the membrane material. Moreover, the upper shield material should likewise be correspondingly close to the signal path, so the curved upper shield material positioned at a significant distance from the signal trace previously used may not normally be sufficient. Accordingly, the shield material should be patterned on the top of the membrane material with a dielectric between the signal trace and the upper shield material. In many cases, the distance between the signal trace and the upper shield directly above the signal trace should be no more than 10 times the distance between the signal trace and the lower shield material. More preferably, the aforementioned distance would be preferably 7, 5, 4, or 2 times.

Claims
  • 1. A probe comprising: (a) a dielectric substrate;(b) an elongate conductor suitable to be electrically interconnected to a test signal supported by a first side of said substrate;(c) a conductive member suitable to be electrically interconnected to a ground signal supported by said second side of said substrate wherein said conductive member is under a majority of the length of said elongate conductor;(d) a conductive path between said first side of said substrate and said second side of said substrate in a manner free from an air gap between the conductive path and the end of said substrate for at least a majority of the thickness of said substrate and said conductive path free from electrical interconnection with said conductive member; and(e) a contact electrically interconnected to said conductive path for testing a device under test.
  • 2. The probe of claim 1 wherein said elongate conductor is electrically interconnected to a central conductor of a coaxial cable.
  • 3. The probe of claim 2 wherein said conductive member is electrically connected to a conductor surrounding said central conductor of said coaxial cable.
  • 4. The probe of claim 3 wherein said substrate is supported by said coaxial cable.
  • 5. The probe of claim 4 wherein said substrate is supported by a shelf of said coaxial cable.
  • 6. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member is substantially planar.
  • 7. The probe of claim 1 wherein said dielectric substrate is semi-flexible.
  • 8. The probe of claim 7 wherein said dielectric substrate is a membrane.
  • 9. The probe of claim 1 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 7.
  • 10. The probe of claim 1 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 5.
  • 11. The probe of claim 1 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 4.
  • 12. The probe of claim 1 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 2.
  • 13. The probe of claim 1 wherein said ground signal is zero volts.
  • 14. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 50% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 15. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 60% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 16. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 70% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 17. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 80% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 18. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 90% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 19. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member, said elongate conductor, and said substrate collectively form a microstrip transmission structure.
  • 20. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive path is a via through said substrate.
  • 21. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member laterally surrounds at least 50% of said contact.
  • 22. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member laterally surrounds at least 75% of said contact.
  • 23. The probe of claim 1 wherein said conductive member laterally surrounds at least 100% of said contact.
  • 24. The probe of claim 1 wherein said contact is in the form of a bump.
  • 25. The probe of claim 1 wherein said substrate has a thickness less than 40 microns.
  • 26. The probe of claim 1 wherein said substrate has a thickness less than 30 microns.
  • 27. The probe of claim 1 wherein said substrate has a thickness less than 20 microns.
  • 28. A probe comprising: (a) a dielectric substrate supporting an elongate conductor on a first side of said substrate and a conductive member supported by said second side of said substrate wherein said conductive member is under a majority of the length of said elongate conductor;(b) a conductive path between said first side of said substrate and said second side of said substrate in a region within the periphery of said substrate for at least a majority of the thickness of said substrate; and(c) a contact electrically interconnected to said conductive path for testing a device under test.
  • 29. The probe of claim 28 wherein said elongate conductor is electrically interconnected to a central conductor of a coaxial cable.
  • 30. The probe of claim 29 wherein said conductive member is electrically connected to a conductor surrounding said central conductor of said coaxial cable.
  • 31. The probe of claim 28 wherein said dielectric substrate is flexible.
  • 32. The probe of claim 31 wherein said dielectric substrate is a membrane.
  • 33. The probe of claim 28 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 7.
  • 34. The probe of claim 28 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 5.
  • 35. The probe of claim 28 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 4.
  • 36. The probe of claim 28 wherein said dielectric substrate has a dielectric constant less than 2.
  • 37. The probe of claim 28 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 50% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 38. The probe of claim 28 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 60% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 39. The probe of claim 28 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 70% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 40. The probe of claim 28 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 80% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 41. The probe of claim 28 wherein said conductive member covers greater than 90% of said second side of said substrate.
  • 42. The probe of claim 28 wherein said conductive member, said elongate conductor, and said substrate collectively form a microstrip transmission structure.
  • 43. The probe of claim 28 wherein said substrate has a thickness less than 40 microns.
  • 44. The probe of claim 28 wherein said substrate has a thickness less than 20 microns.
  • 45. The probe of claim 28 wherein said substrate has a thickness less than 10 microns.
US Referenced Citations (232)
Number Name Date Kind
3445770 Harmon May 1969 A
3700998 Lee et al. Oct 1972 A
3849728 Evans Nov 1974 A
4593243 Lao et al. Jun 1986 A
4663840 Ubbens et al. May 1987 A
4697143 Lockwood et al. Sep 1987 A
4727319 Shahriary Feb 1988 A
4727391 Shahriary Feb 1988 A
4749942 Sang et al. Jun 1988 A
4791363 Logan Dec 1988 A
4795962 Yanagawa et al. Jan 1989 A
4849689 Gleason et al. Jul 1989 A
4871964 Boll et al. Oct 1989 A
4894612 Drake et al. Jan 1990 A
4983910 Majidi-Ahy et al. Jan 1991 A
4998062 Ikeda Mar 1991 A
5003253 Majidi-Ahy et al. Mar 1991 A
5021186 Ota et al. Jun 1991 A
5045781 Gleason et al. Sep 1991 A
5126286 Chance Jun 1992 A
5136237 Smith et al. Aug 1992 A
5274336 Crook Dec 1993 A
5293175 Hemmie et al. Mar 1994 A
5371654 Beaman et al. Dec 1994 A
5441690 Ayola-Esquilin et al. Aug 1995 A
5453404 Leedy Sep 1995 A
5476211 Khandros Dec 1995 A
5506515 Godshalk et al. Apr 1996 A
5531022 Beaman et al. Jul 1996 A
5537372 Albrecht et al. Jul 1996 A
5565788 Burr et al. Oct 1996 A
5601740 Eldridge et al. Feb 1997 A
5635846 Beaman et al. Jun 1997 A
5700844 Hedrick et al. Dec 1997 A
5723347 Hirano et al. Mar 1998 A
5726211 Hedrick et al. Mar 1998 A
5742174 Kister et al. Apr 1998 A
5756021 Hedrick et al. May 1998 A
5772451 Dozier, II et al. Jun 1998 A
5773780 Eldridge et al. Jun 1998 A
5785538 Beaman et al. Jul 1998 A
5804607 Hedrick et al. Sep 1998 A
5806181 Khandros et al. Sep 1998 A
5810607 Shih et al. Sep 1998 A
5811982 Beaman et al. Sep 1998 A
5813847 Eroglu et al. Sep 1998 A
5814847 Shihadeh et al. Sep 1998 A
5820014 Dozier, II et al. Oct 1998 A
5821763 Beaman et al. Oct 1998 A
5829128 Eldridge et al. Nov 1998 A
5832601 Eldridge et al. Nov 1998 A
5838160 Beaman et al. Nov 1998 A
5864946 Eldridge et al. Feb 1999 A
5878486 Eldridge et al. Mar 1999 A
5884398 Eldridge et al. Mar 1999 A
5900738 Khandros et al. May 1999 A
5912046 Eldridge et al. Jun 1999 A
5914613 Gleason et al. Jun 1999 A
5914614 Beaman et al. Jun 1999 A
5917707 Khandros et al. Jun 1999 A
5926951 Khandros et al. Jul 1999 A
5974662 Eldridge et al. Nov 1999 A
5983493 Eldridge et al. Nov 1999 A
5994152 Khandros Nov 1999 A
5998228 Eldridge et al. Dec 1999 A
5998864 Khandros et al. Dec 1999 A
6023103 Chang et al. Feb 2000 A
6029344 Khandros et al. Feb 2000 A
6032356 Eldridge et al. Mar 2000 A
6033935 Dozier, II et al. Mar 2000 A
6042712 Mathieu Mar 2000 A
6043563 Eldridge et al. Mar 2000 A
6049976 Khandros Apr 2000 A
6050829 Eldridge Apr 2000 A
6054651 Fogel et al. Apr 2000 A
6062879 Beaman et al. May 2000 A
6064213 Khandros et al. May 2000 A
6078500 Beaman et al. Jun 2000 A
6090261 Mathieu Jul 2000 A
6104201 Beaman et al. Aug 2000 A
6110823 Eldridge et al. Aug 2000 A
6114864 Soejima et al. Sep 2000 A
6118287 Boil et al. Sep 2000 A
6150186 Chen et al. Nov 2000 A
6168974 Chang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174744 Watanabe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184053 Eldridge et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184587 Khandros et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206273 Beaman et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208225 Miller Mar 2001 B1
6215196 Eldridge et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215670 Khandros Apr 2001 B1
6218910 Miller Apr 2001 B1
6229327 Boll et al. May 2001 B1
6232149 Dozier, II et al. May 2001 B1
6242803 Khandros et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246247 Eldridge et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255126 Mathieu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268015 Mathieu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274823 Khandros et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281691 Matsunaga et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286208 Shih et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295729 Beaman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300780 Beaman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307161 Grube et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310483 Taura et al. Oct 2001 B1
6329827 Beaman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330164 Khandros et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332270 Beaman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334247 Beaman et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339338 Eldridge et al. Jan 2002 B1
6384614 Hager et al. May 2002 B1
6400168 Matsunaga et al. Jun 2002 B1
6429029 Eldridge et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441315 Eldridge et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442831 Khandros et al. Sep 2002 B1
6448865 Miller Sep 2002 B1
6452406 Beaman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6452411 Miller et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456099 Eldridge et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456103 Eldridge et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459343 Miller Oct 2002 B1
6459739 Vitenberg Oct 2002 B1
6468098 Eldridge Oct 2002 B1
6475822 Eldridge Nov 2002 B1
6476333 Khandros et al. Nov 2002 B1
6476630 Whitten et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479308 Eldridge Nov 2002 B1
6480978 Roy et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482013 Eldridge et al. Nov 2002 B1
6491968 Mathieu et al. Dec 2002 B1
6499121 Roy et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501343 Miller Dec 2002 B1
6509751 Mathieu et al. Jan 2003 B1
6520778 Eldridge et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525555 Khandros et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526655 Beaman et al. Mar 2003 B1
6528984 Beaman et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534856 Dozier, II et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538214 Khandros Mar 2003 B1
6538538 Hreish et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539531 Miller et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549106 Martin Apr 2003 B1
6551884 Eldridge et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559671 Miller et al. May 2003 B1
6597187 Eldridge et al. Jul 2003 B1
6603323 Miller et al. Aug 2003 B1
6603324 Eldridge et al. Aug 2003 B1
6606014 Miller Aug 2003 B1
6606575 Miller Aug 2003 B1
6615485 Eldridge et al. Sep 2003 B1
6616966 Mathieu et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621260 Eldridge et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622103 Miller Sep 2003 B1
6624648 Eldridge et al. Sep 2003 B1
6627483 Ondricek et al. Sep 2003 B1
6627980 Eldridge Sep 2003 B1
6640415 Eslamy et al. Nov 2003 B1
6640432 Mathieu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6642625 Dozier, II et al. Nov 2003 B1
6644982 Ondricek et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646520 Miller Nov 2003 B1
6655023 Eldridge et al. Dec 2003 B1
6657455 Eldridge et al. Dec 2003 B1
6661316 Hreish et al. Dec 2003 B1
6664628 Khandros et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669489 Dozier, II et al. Dec 2003 B1
6672875 Mathieu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677744 Long Jan 2004 B1
6678850 Roy et al. Jan 2004 B1
6678876 Stevens et al. Jan 2004 B1
6680659 Miller Jan 2004 B1
6685817 Mathieu Feb 2004 B1
6686754 Miller Feb 2004 B1
6690185 Khandros et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701612 Khandros et al. Mar 2004 B1
6708403 Beaman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6713374 Eldridge et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714828 Eldridge et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720501 Henson Apr 2004 B1
6722032 Beaman et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727579 Eldridge et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727580 Eldridge et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727716 Sharif Apr 2004 B1
6729019 Grube et al. May 2004 B1
6741085 Khandros et al. May 2004 B1
6741092 Eldridge et al. May 2004 B1
6759311 Eldridge et al. Jul 2004 B1
6764869 Eldridge Jul 2004 B1
6777319 Grube et al. Aug 2004 B1
6778406 Eldridge et al. Aug 2004 B1
6780001 Eldridge et al. Aug 2004 B1
6784674 Miller Aug 2004 B1
6784677 Miller et al. Aug 2004 B1
6784679 Sweet et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788094 Khandros et al. Sep 2004 B1
6791176 Mathieu et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798225 Miller Sep 2004 B1
6807734 Eldridge et al. Oct 2004 B1
6811406 Grube Nov 2004 B1
6812691 Miller Nov 2004 B1
6815963 Gleason et al. Nov 2004 B1
6816031 Miller Nov 2004 B1
6817052 Grube Nov 2004 B1
6818840 Khandros Nov 2004 B1
6822529 Miller Nov 2004 B1
6825052 Eldridge et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825422 Eldridge et al. Nov 2004 B1
6827584 Mathieu et al. Dec 2004 B1
6835898 Eldridge et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836962 Khandros et al. Jan 2005 B1
6839964 Henson Jan 2005 B1
6845491 Miller et al. Jan 2005 B1
6856150 Sporck et al. Feb 2005 B1
6862727 Stevens Mar 2005 B1
6864105 Grube et al. Mar 2005 B1
6864694 McTigue Mar 2005 B1
6870381 Grube Mar 2005 B1
6882239 Miller Apr 2005 B1
6882546 Miller Apr 2005 B1
6887723 Ondricek et al. May 2005 B1
6888362 Eldridge et al. May 2005 B1
6891385 Miller May 2005 B1
6900647 Yoshida et al. May 2005 B1
6900652 Mazur May 2005 B1
6900653 Yu et al. May 2005 B1
6910268 Miller Jun 2005 B1
6911814 Miller et al. Jun 2005 B1
6911835 Chraft et al. Jun 2005 B1
6913468 Dozier, II et al. Jul 2005 B1
6917210 Miller Jul 2005 B1
20050062533 Vice Mar 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
230348 Jul 1985 EP
945736 Sep 1999 EP
62239050 Oct 1987 JP
7012871 Jan 1995 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050099191 A1 May 2005 US