The present invention relates to probe measurement systems for measuring the electrical characteristics of integrated circuits or other microelectronic devices at high frequencies.
There are many types of probing assemblies that have been developed for the measurement of integrated circuits and other forms of microelectronic devices. One representative type of assembly uses a circuit card on which the upper side are formed elongate conductive traces that serve as signal and ground lines. A central opening is formed in the card, and a needle-like probe tip is attached to the end of each signal trace adjacent the opening so that a radially extending array of downwardly converging needle-like tips is presented by the assembly for selective connection with the closely spaced pads of the microelectronic device being tested. A probe assembly of this type is shown, for example, in Harmon U.S. Pat. No. 3,445,770. This type of probing assembly, however, is unsuitable for use at higher frequencies, including microwave frequencies in the gigahertz range, because at such frequencies the needle-like tips act as inductive elements and because there are no adjoining elements present to suitably counteract this inductance with a capacitive effect in a manner that would create a broadband characteristic of more or less resistive effect. Accordingly, a probing assembly of the type just described is unsuitable for use at microwave frequencies due to the high levels of signal reflection and substantial inductive losses that occur at the needle-like probe tips.
In order to obtain device measurements at somewhat higher frequencies than are possible with the basic probe card system described above, various related probing systems have been developed. Such systems are shown, for example, in Evans U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,728; Kikuchi Japanese Publication No. 1-209,380; Sang et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,749,942; Lao et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,593,243; and Shahriary U.S. Pat. No. 4,727,319. Yet another related system is shown in Kawanabe Japanese Publication No. 60-223,138 which describes a probe assembly having needle-like tips where the tips extend from a coaxial cable-like structure instead of a probe card. A common feature of each of these systems is that the length of the isolated portion of each needle-like probe tip is limited to the region immediately surrounding the device-under-test in order to minimize the region of discontinuity and the amount of inductive loss. However, this approach has resulted in only limited improvement in higher frequency performance due to various practical limitations in the construction of these types of probes. In Lao et al., for example, the length of each needle-like tip is minimized by using a wide conductive blade to span the distance between each tip and the supporting probe card, and these blades, in turn, are designed to be arranged relative to each other so as to form transmission line structures of stripline type. As a practical matter, however, it is difficult to join the thin vertical edge of each blade to the corresponding trace on the card while maintaining precisely the appropriate amount of face-to-face spacing between the blades and precisely the correct pitch between the ends of the needle-like probe tips.
One type of probing assembly that is capable of providing a controlled-impedance low-loss path between its input terminal and the probe tips is shown in Lockwood et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,697,143. In Lockwood et al., a ground-signal-ground arrangement of strip-like conductive traces is formed on the underside of an alumina substrate so as to form a coplanar transmission line on the substrate. At one end, each associated pair of ground traces and the corresponding interposed signal trace are connected to the outer conductor and the center conductor, respectively, of a coaxial cable connector. At the other end of these traces, areas of wear-resistant conductive material are provided in order to reliably establish electrical connection with the respective pads of the device to be tested. Layers of ferrite-containing microwave absorbing material are mounted about the substrate to absorb spurious microwave energy over a major portion of the length of each ground-signal-ground trace pattern. In accordance with this type of construction, a controlled high-frequency impedance (e.g., 50 ohms) can be presented at the probe tips to the device under test, and broadband signals that are within the range, for example, of DC to 18 gigahertz can travel with little loss from one end of the probe assembly to another along the coplanar transmission line formed by each ground-signal-ground trace pattern. The probing assembly shown in Lockwood et al. fails to provide satisfactory electrical performance at higher microwave frequencies and there is a need in microwave probing technology for compliance to adjust for uneven probing pads.
To achieve improved spatial conformance between the tip conductors of a probe and an array of non-planar device pads or surfaces, several high-frequency probing assemblies have been developed. Such assemblies are described, for example, in Drake et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,894,612; Coberly et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,523; and Boll et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,964. The Drake et al. probing assembly includes a substrate on the underside of which are formed a plurality of conductive traces which collectively form a coplanar transmission line. However, in one embodiment shown in Drake et al., the tip end of the substrate is notched so that each trace extends to the end of a separate tooth and the substrate is made of moderately flexible nonceramic material. The moderately flexible substrate permits, at least to a limited extent, independent flexure of each tooth relative to the other teeth so as to enable spatial conformance of the trace ends to slightly non-planar contact surfaces on a device-under-test. However, the Drake et al. probing assembly has insufficient performance at high frequencies.
With respect to the probing assembly shown in Boll et al., as cited above, the ground conductors comprise a pair of leaf-spring members the rear portions of which are received into diametrically opposite slots formed on the end of a miniature coaxial cable for electrical connection with the cylindrical outer conductor of that cable. The center conductor of the cable is extended beyond the end of the cable (i.e., as defined by the ends of the outer conductor and the inner dielectric) and is gradually tapered to form a pin-like member having a rounded point. In accordance with this construction, the pin-like extension of the center conductor is disposed in spaced apart generally centered position between the respective forward portions of the leaf-spring members and thereby forms, in combination with these leaf-spring members, a rough approximation to a ground-signal-ground coplanar transmission line structure. The advantage of this particular construction is that the pin-like extension of the cable's center conductor and the respective forward portions of the leaf-spring members are each movable independently of each other so that the ends of these respective members are able to establish spatially conforming contact with any non-planar contact areas on a device being tested. On the other hand, the transverse-spacing between the pin-like member and the respective leaf-spring members will vary depending on how forcefully the ends of these members are urged against the contact pads of the device-under-test. In other words, the transmission characteristic of this probing structure, which is dependent on the spacing between the respective tip members, will vary in an ill-defined manner during each probing cycle, especially at high microwave frequencies.
Burr et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,788, disclose a microwave probe that includes a supporting section of a coaxial cable including an inner conductor coaxially surrounded by an outer conductor. A tip section of the microwave probe includes a central signal conductor and one or more ground conductors generally arranged normally in parallel relationship to each other along a common plane with the central signal conductor so as to form a controlled impedance structure. The signal conductor is electrically connected to the inner conductor and the ground conductors are electrically connected to the outer conductor, as shown in
In another embodiment, Burr et al. disclose a microwave probe that includes a supporting section of a coaxial cable including an inner conductor coaxially surrounded by an outer conductor, as shown in
The present inventors considered the co-planar fingered probing devices disclosed by Burr et al., including the co-planar finger configuration and the microstrip configuration with fingers extending therefrom. In both cases, electromagnetic fields are created during probing between the fingers. These electromagnetic fields encircle each of the fingers, electrically couple the signal finger to the ground fingers, and electrically couple the ground fingers one another. While the probing device is being used for probing, the resulting electromagnetic fields surrounding the fingers interact with the wafer environment. While probing in different regions of the wafer, the interaction between the electromagnetic fields around the fingers and the wafer change, typically in an unknown manner. With a significant unknown change in the interaction it is difficult, if not impossible, to accurately calibrate out the environmental conditions while probing a device under test.
When multiple probes are being simultaneously used for probing the same area of the wafer, the probe tips come into close proximity with one another and result in additional coupling between the probes, normally referred to as cross-talk. In addition, the region between the support for the fingers, such as a dielectric substrate, and the extended portion of the fingers results in a significant capacitance, which impedes high frequency measurements.
The present inventors were surprised to determine that the microstrip structure disclosed by Burr et al. further does not calibrate well on calibration test substrates at very high frequencies, such as in excess of 70 GHz. This calibration is independent of potential interaction with a wafer at a later time during actual probing of a device under test. After examination of this unexpected non-calibration effect the present inventors speculate that an energy is created in an “undesired mode”, other than the dominant field modes, at such extreme frequencies. This “undesired mode” results in unexpected current leakages from the signal path thus degrading the signal integrity. The present inventors further speculate that this “undesired mode” involves resonating energy in the ground plane as a result of discontinuities in the ground path, including for example, the connection between the ground plane and the external portion of the cable, and the inductance in the ground plane. This ground plane resonant energy results in unpredictable changing of the energy in the signal path to the device under test, thus degrading performance. This degradation wasn't apparent at lower operating frequencies, so accordingly, there was no motivation to modify existing probe designs in order to eliminate or otherwise reduce its effects.
Referring to
A microstrip style probe tip 80 includes a dielectric substrate 88 that is affixed to the end of the coaxial cable 40. The underside of the cable 40 is cut away to form a shelf 85, and the dielectric substrate 88 is affixed to the shelf 85. Alternatively, the dielectric substrate 88 may be supported by an upwardly facing shelf cut away from the cable or the end of the cable without a shelf. Referring also to
One or more conductive signal traces 92 are supported by the upper surface of the substrate 88. The conductive traces 92, may be for example, deposited using any technique or otherwise supported by the upper surface of the substrate. The conductive trace(s) 92 is electrically interconnected to the inner conductor 41 of the coaxial cable 40. The inner conductor 41 of the coaxial cable 40 and the conductive trace(s) 92 normally carries the signal to and from the device under test. The conductive trace(s) 92 together with the shield layer 90 separated by a dielectric material 88 form one type of a microstrip transmission structure. Other layers above, below, and/or between the shield layer 90 and the conductive trace 92 may be included, if desired.
To reduce the effects of the aforementioned unexpected high frequency signal degradation, the present inventors determined that the signal path may include a conductive via 94 passing through the substrate 88. The conductive via 94 provides a manner of transferring the signal path from the upper surface of the substrate to the lower surface of the substrate. The conductive via 94 avoids the need for using a conductive finger extending out from the end of the substrate 88 that would otherwise result in a significant capacitance between the extended finger and the end of the substrate 88. The conductive via 94 provides a path from one side of the substrate 88 to the other side of the substrate 88 in a manner free from an air gap between the conductive via 94 and the substrate 88 for at least a majority of the thickness of the substrate 88. In addition, the shield layer 90 preferably extends beyond the via 94 to provide additional shielding.
Referring also to
Referring to
The upper shield 110 has a tapered cylindrical portion whose forward end is a tapered tip and whose rear end has a contour that is in continuous contact with the outer coaxial conductor along its circumference so that there is no gap between the outer conductor and portions of the shield that could create fringing fields that could effect probe measurements. Likewise, anyother shape may be used for the shield 110, as desired. In addition, the forward end preferably extends past the via and forms a substantially closed region so that there is reduced fringing fields at the forward end. The shield reduces parasitic coupling to any external structure and the construction of the shield as a single piece of metal reduces complexity of assembly. The shield is preferably made of a thin foil and is capable of being formed by a fabrication process. The sheild may also be deposited or made of other material.
The lower shield member 90 extends underneath the conductive trace between the fingers and the chuck holding the device under test. The shield therefore helps to block the generation of ground plane resonant modes that can otherwise interfere with and degrade the signal from the device under test.
Referring to
While the use of an upper shield 110 that includes a curved surface provides an improvement to signal integrity, the changes in the structure of the upper shield tend to introduce some limitations into the signal integrity at high frequencies, thus impeding performance. For example, the changes in the height of the upper shield changes the electromagnetic field pattern along the length of the signal conductor. In addition, increased manufacturing complexity occurs with the upper shield. Furthermore, in most cases microwave microstrip transmission structures are enclosed in a housing, such as a conductive case, and accordingly there is reduced motivation to include an upper shield structure.
To further increase the performance at high frequencies the present inventors considered the effects of the substrate material. In many cases the dielectric constant of the dielectric substrate material is high, such as Al2O3 which has a 9.9 dielectric constant. Materials with a high dielectric constant have a tendency to concentrate the electromagnetic fields therein, thus decreasing the electromagnetic fields susceptible to influence by other devices. In addition, the thickness of the substrate is typically 250–500 microns to provide mechanical stability. Thus the fields tend to concentrate within the substrate.
Referring to
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3445770 | Harmon | May 1969 | A |
3700998 | Lee et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3849728 | Evans | Nov 1974 | A |
4593243 | Lao et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4663840 | Ubbens et al. | May 1987 | A |
4697143 | Lockwood et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4727319 | Shahriary | Feb 1988 | A |
4727391 | Shahriary | Feb 1988 | A |
4749942 | Sang et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4791363 | Logan | Dec 1988 | A |
4795962 | Yanagawa et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4849689 | Gleason et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4871964 | Boll et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4894612 | Drake et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4983910 | Majidi-Ahy et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998062 | Ikeda | Mar 1991 | A |
5003253 | Majidi-Ahy et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5021186 | Ota et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5045781 | Gleason et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5126286 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5136237 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5274336 | Crook | Dec 1993 | A |
5293175 | Hemmie et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5371654 | Beaman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5441690 | Ayola-Esquilin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453404 | Leedy | Sep 1995 | A |
5476211 | Khandros | Dec 1995 | A |
5506515 | Godshalk et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5531022 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537372 | Albrecht et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5565788 | Burr et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5601740 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5635846 | Beaman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5700844 | Hedrick et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5723347 | Hirano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726211 | Hedrick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742174 | Kister et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756021 | Hedrick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772451 | Dozier, II et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773780 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785538 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5804607 | Hedrick et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806181 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810607 | Shih et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811982 | Beaman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813847 | Eroglu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814847 | Shihadeh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820014 | Dozier, II et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821763 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829128 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832601 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838160 | Beaman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5864946 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878486 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884398 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900738 | Khandros et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912046 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914613 | Gleason et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914614 | Beaman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917707 | Khandros et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926951 | Khandros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5974662 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983493 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994152 | Khandros | Nov 1999 | A |
5998228 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998864 | Khandros et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023103 | Chang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029344 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032356 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033935 | Dozier, II et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042712 | Mathieu | Mar 2000 | A |
6043563 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049976 | Khandros | Apr 2000 | A |
6050829 | Eldridge | Apr 2000 | A |
6054651 | Fogel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062879 | Beaman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064213 | Khandros et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078500 | Beaman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090261 | Mathieu | Jul 2000 | A |
6104201 | Beaman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110823 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114864 | Soejima et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118287 | Boil et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6150186 | Chen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168974 | Chang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174744 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184053 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184587 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206273 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208225 | Miller | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215196 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215670 | Khandros | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218910 | Miller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229327 | Boll et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232149 | Dozier, II et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242803 | Khandros et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246247 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255126 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268015 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274823 | Khandros et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281691 | Matsunaga et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286208 | Shih et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295729 | Beaman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300780 | Beaman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307161 | Grube et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310483 | Taura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329827 | Beaman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330164 | Khandros et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332270 | Beaman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334247 | Beaman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339338 | Eldridge et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6384614 | Hager et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400168 | Matsunaga et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429029 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441315 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442831 | Khandros et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448865 | Miller | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452406 | Beaman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452411 | Miller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456099 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456103 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459343 | Miller | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459739 | Vitenberg | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468098 | Eldridge | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475822 | Eldridge | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476333 | Khandros et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476630 | Whitten et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479308 | Eldridge | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480978 | Roy et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482013 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491968 | Mathieu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499121 | Roy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501343 | Miller | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509751 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520778 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525555 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526655 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6528984 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534856 | Dozier, II et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538214 | Khandros | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538538 | Hreish et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539531 | Miller et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549106 | Martin | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551884 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559671 | Miller et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6597187 | Eldridge et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603323 | Miller et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603324 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606014 | Miller | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606575 | Miller | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615485 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616966 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621260 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622103 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624648 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627483 | Ondricek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627980 | Eldridge | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640415 | Eslamy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6640432 | Mathieu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6642625 | Dozier, II et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6644982 | Ondricek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646520 | Miller | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655023 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6657455 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661316 | Hreish et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664628 | Khandros et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669489 | Dozier, II et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672875 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6677744 | Long | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678850 | Roy et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678876 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680659 | Miller | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685817 | Mathieu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6686754 | Miller | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690185 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701612 | Khandros et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708403 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713374 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714828 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720501 | Henson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6722032 | Beaman et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727579 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727580 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727716 | Sharif | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6729019 | Grube et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741085 | Khandros et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741092 | Eldridge et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6759311 | Eldridge et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764869 | Eldridge | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6777319 | Grube et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778406 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780001 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784674 | Miller | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784677 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6784679 | Sweet et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788094 | Khandros et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791176 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798225 | Miller | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807734 | Eldridge et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6811406 | Grube | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6812691 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6815963 | Gleason et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816031 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6817052 | Grube | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818840 | Khandros | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822529 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825052 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825422 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827584 | Mathieu et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6835898 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836962 | Khandros et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839964 | Henson | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845491 | Miller et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6856150 | Sporck et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862727 | Stevens | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6864105 | Grube et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6864694 | McTigue | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870381 | Grube | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882239 | Miller | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882546 | Miller | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6887723 | Ondricek et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6888362 | Eldridge et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6891385 | Miller | May 2005 | B1 |
6900647 | Yoshida et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6900652 | Mazur | May 2005 | B1 |
6900653 | Yu et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6910268 | Miller | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911814 | Miller et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911835 | Chraft et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6913468 | Dozier, II et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6917210 | Miller | Jul 2005 | B1 |
20050062533 | Vice | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
230348 | Jul 1985 | EP |
945736 | Sep 1999 | EP |
62239050 | Oct 1987 | JP |
7012871 | Jan 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050099191 A1 | May 2005 | US |