The present Application is related to the following U.S. Patents and U.S. Patent Applications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/173,729, filed Jun. 30, 2005 and entitled “A Method And Apparatus For Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) In A Proximity System;” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/539,611, filed Oct. 6, 2006 and entitled “Proximity Processing Using Controlled Batch Volume With An Integrated Proximity Head.
In the manufacture of integrated circuit (IC) devices, a semiconductor substrate, such as a silicon wafer, is processed by placing the substrate through any number of process steps. Such steps include deposition steps, removal steps, patterning steps (e.g., photolithography), and doping. In many instances, material is removed, added, or modified by exposing the substrate to a chemical for a period of time. In addition, there may be cleaning and rinsing steps to remove residue of the chemical left on the substrate, which could damage the device if allowed to remain.
As IC device features continue to decrease in size, existing methods for processing wafers by exposing the wafers to liquid chemicals have become inadequate. For example, a traditional immersion method, whereby a substrate is submerged in a liquid chemical, such as an organic solvent chemical or wet etching chemical, does not provide sufficient control over contact time between the substrate and the chemical. For example, the upper portion of the substrate may be the last to be lowered into the chemical and the first to be lifted out from the chemical. Furthermore, after being raised out of the chemical, the substrate may still have a layer of chemical adhered to the surface of the substrate for some time until the substrate can be moved to a rinsing and drying station. It would be desirable to more precisely control the contact time and the time to rinse.
In addition, substrate immersion does not provide an efficient use of the chemicals. For example, immersion requires significantly more chemical liquid than necessary to carry out the desired chemical reaction or process. In some instances, this liquid cannot be reused, or can only be reused a limited number of times. It would therefore be desirable to reduce the amount of chemical usage for a given process.
Finally, immersion techniques are amenable to batch processing, wherein a number of substrates are lowered into the chemical at the same time. While this improves the efficiency of the immersion technique, it requires additional handling of the substrate to load a number of substrates into a tray and then unload them. Each time a substrate is handled, i.e., moved from one process station to the next, it delays the time to the next process step. In addition, a time delay between removal of a substrate from a chemical and washing, rinsing, and drying operations can vary when a number of substrates are removed at once, but then are further processed only one at a time. It would be desirable to handle a substrate fewer times, and to provide for more consistent handling of substrates from one substrate to the next.
To overcome the advantages noted above, there is a need for improved mechanisms for treatment of a substrate with a liquid chemical.
Broadly speaking, the present invention fills these needs by providing various techniques for wet treatment of substrates including etching, cleaning, wetting, washing, rinsing and drying resulting in a removal of unwanted layers, residuals, contaminants, watermarks, etc. left on the surface during previous processing steps.
It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device, or a method, Several inventive embodiments of the present invention are described below.
In one embodiment, a system for processing a substrate is provided. The system includes a proximity head, a mechanism to move the proximity head with respect to a substrate (or a substrate with respect to proximity head, or both), and a liquid management system providing fluid communication with the proximity head. The proximity head is configured to generate on a surface of a substrate a controlled meniscus. Specifically, the proximity head has a plurality of distinct dispensing nozzles formed on a face of the proximity head, the dispensing nozzles being configured to supply a liquid to the meniscus, and plurality of distinct retrieving nozzles formed to remove a liquid from a meniscus after contacting with substrate. The mechanism to move the proximity head, or a substrate, or both with respect one to another, maintains controllable contact between the meniscus and a surface of the substrate and causes a thin layer of the liquid to remain on the surface after being contacted by the meniscus. The liquid supply is configured to balance an amount of the liquid delivered to the meniscus with an amount of liquid removed from the meniscus, the liquid removed including at least the thin layer of the liquid remaining on the substrate.
In another embodiment, a method for processing a substrate is provided. The method includes generating a controlled meniscus using a proximity head, the proximity head having a face in close proximity to a surface of the substrate. The controlled meniscus is generated by delivering a chemical to the meniscus through discrete nozzles formed in the face of the proximity head. The proximity head is moved over the substrate so that an area of contact between the meniscus and the substrate moves from one location to another location on the substrate. The moving of the proximity head causes a chemical remainder to be left behind the surface of the substrate at the first location, the chemical remainder being a layer of the chemical from the meniscus that adheres to the surface of the substrate. An amount of chemical being delivered to the proximity head is balanced with an amount of chemical removed from the meniscus back to the head (static mode), or with an amount of chemical removed from the meniscus back to the head and the chemical remainder (dynamic mode), so that the meniscus maintains a substantially constant volume of the chemical.
The advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations and implementation details have not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention. The term, “meniscus,” as used herein, refers to a volume of liquid bounded and contained in part by surface tension of the liquid. The meniscus is also controllable and can be moved over a surface in the contained shape. In specific embodiments, the meniscus is maintained by the delivery of fluids to a surface while also removing the fluids so that the meniscus remains controllable. Furthermore, the meniscus shape can be controlled by precision fluid delivery and removal systems that are in part interfaced with a controller a computing system, which may be networked. In some embodiments, a fluid delivery system is provided and no fluid removal system is provided, as described in more detail below.
Although only pair of upper and lower proximity heads 110, 120 is shown, any number of proximity heads, generating a plurality of menisci side-by-side, with carrier 150 passing through each in series. A plurality of menisci can be used, for example, to perform a plurality of treatment steps, such as etch, clean, and then rinse and dry. Furthermore, it is not required to have both an upper and lower proximity head, since a controlled meniscus can be generated on one side of a substrate with a single proximity head.
It should further be noted that, while in the example shown in
In certain embodiments, a controller 130, which may be a general purpose or specific purpose computer system whose functionality is determined by logic circuits or software, or both, controls the movement of carrier 150 and the flow of fluids to upper and lower proximity heads 110, 120. The flow of fluids to and from proximity heads 110, 120 is controlled to maintain the meniscus in a stable state.
Proximity head 110 includes at least one dispensing nozzle 116 (two are shown in
Substrate processing system 100 also includes a chemical supply system 180 and a chemical removal system 190. Chemical supply system 180 and chemical removal system 190 may be connected to one another to allow recycling of chemicals. For example, a tertiary recycling system (not shown) may receive used chemical from chemical removal system 190 and treat the used chemical, e.g., by filtering, distilling, or other operations, before returning the used chemical to chemical supply system 180. Chemical supply system 180 may include heating means (not shown) for heating the chemical, e.g., to enhance the reacting power of the chemical. Control unit 130 regulates the operation of chemical supply and retrieval systems 180, 190 to ensure that the chemical flows to and from meniscus 200 are at controlled rates so that meniscus 200 remains in a stable state. By “a stable state,” it is meant that the meniscus has a substantially constant volume, spillage from the meniscus, which may be expected at the edges of the substrate, is controlled and compensated for. Thus, the fluid flowing to and from meniscus 200 is substantially balanced, with only sufficient additional fluid flowing to the meniscus to compensate for fluid 202 remaining on the meniscus and the expected amount, if any, of spillage.
In one embodiment, proximity head 110 includes a plurality of dispensing nozzles 116 surrounding a plurality of suction ports 114 as shown and described in more detail below with reference to
Sensors 262, 262′ signal control unit 270 when the liquid level in chemical supply tanks 260, 260′ becomes too high or too low. In response to a signal indicating that liquid is too low, control unit 270 operates pump 275 to recycle used chemical 257 from chemical retrieval tank 280 to chemical supply tanks 255, 255′ via fluid lines 268, 276, and 276′. Valves V1, V1′ are operated by control unit 270 to ensure that recycled chemical is supplied to the correct chemical supply tank.
In operation 506, the proximity head is moved over the substrate, leaving a chemical remainder on the substrate surface. The chemical remainder may be, for example, a film of chemical adhering to the substrate surface. In one embodiment, a surfactant is added to the chemical to ensure adhesion with the substrate surface, which may or may not be hydrophilic.
In operation 508, used chemical is optionally removed from the meniscus using suction ports formed in the proximity head. It should be noted that, depending on the chemical processes, the chemical may degrade and need to be refreshed by removing used chemicals and supplying new chemicals. For example, if the chemical is used for oxide removal and the chemical comprises a solution of sulfuric acid, the acidity of the solution may reduce as it reacts with the substrate surface. In one embodiment, therefore, the chemical is constantly being replaced with unused chemical for the purpose of maintaining desired properties thereof. The flow rate of chemical removal may depend on the chemical and process involved. In another embodiment, chemical replacement is not required so that removal is unnecessary.
In operation 510, the meniscus is controlled by balancing the amount of chemical delivered to the meniscus with the amount of chemical removed and the amount of chemical remainder. The procedure then ends as indicated by operation 512. It should be noted that, although the operations presented in
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This Application is a continuation-in-part application under 35 U.S.C. §120 and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/750,960 filed on May 18, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,387,689, issued on Jun. 17, 2008, entitled “Methods For Drying Semiconductor Wafer Surfaces Using A Plurality Of Inlets And Outlets Held In Close Proximity To The Wafer Surfaces,” which claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/261,839 filed on Sep. 30, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,234,477, issued on Jun. 26, 2007, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Drying Semiconductor Wafer Surfaces Using A Plurality Of Inlets And Outlets Held In Close Proximity To The Wafer Surface,” which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3953265 | Hood | Apr 1976 | A |
4086870 | Canavello et al. | May 1978 | A |
4367123 | Beck | Jan 1983 | A |
4444492 | Lee | Apr 1984 | A |
4838289 | Kottman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5102494 | Harvey et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5180431 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5271774 | Leenaars et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5294257 | Kelly et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5343234 | Kuehnle | Aug 1994 | A |
5361449 | Akimoto | Nov 1994 | A |
5472502 | Batchelder | Dec 1995 | A |
5558111 | Lofaro | Sep 1996 | A |
5601655 | Bok et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5654034 | Tulloch et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660642 | Britten | Aug 1997 | A |
5696348 | Kawamura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705223 | Bunkofske | Jan 1998 | A |
5709757 | Hatano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5807522 | Brown et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820686 | Moore | Oct 1998 | A |
5830334 | Kobayashi | Nov 1998 | A |
5882433 | Ueno | Mar 1999 | A |
5893004 | Yamamura | Apr 1999 | A |
5945351 | Mathuni | Aug 1999 | A |
5975098 | Yoshitani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989478 | Ouellette et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997653 | Yamasaka | Dec 1999 | A |
6022099 | Chwalek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6086454 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092937 | Snodgrass et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103636 | Zahorik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108932 | Chai | Aug 2000 | A |
6132586 | Adams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169244 | Carlos | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214513 | Cai et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230722 | Mitsumori et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6341998 | Zhang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6391166 | Wang | May 2002 | B1 |
6398975 | Mertens et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417117 | Davis | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433541 | Lehman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446358 | Mitsumori et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6474786 | Percin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488040 | De Larios et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491764 | Mertens et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6495005 | Colgan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514570 | Matsuyama et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530823 | Ahmadi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531206 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6550988 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555017 | Rushford et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6616772 | De Larios et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629540 | Mitsumori et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6689323 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6764720 | Pui et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6799584 | Yogev et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6851435 | Mertens et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854473 | Hanson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6954993 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6988326 | O'Donnell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988327 | Garcia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000622 | Woods et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7069937 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093375 | O'Donnell | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153400 | Ravkin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7193232 | Lof et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7234477 | de Larios et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240679 | Woods et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252097 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020121290 | Tang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030091754 | Chihani et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092264 | Kajita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040069319 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050132515 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139318 | Woods et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145265 | Ravkin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145267 | Korolik et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145268 | Woods | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148197 | Woods et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050217703 | O'Donnell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070146399 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 905 746 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 905 747 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 489 461 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 489 462 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 571 697 | Sep 2005 | EP |
05837190 | Mar 1983 | JP |
62150828 | Jul 1987 | JP |
02280330 | Nov 1990 | JP |
02309638 | Dec 1990 | JP |
08277486 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9199488 | Jul 1997 | JP |
11-042057 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11031672 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-309400 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11350169 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001220688 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2003-151948 | May 2003 | JP |
480221 | Mar 2002 | TW |
483075 | Apr 2002 | TW |
503455 | Sep 2002 | TW |
542791 | Jul 2003 | TW |
WO 9916109 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0201613 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0232825 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02101795 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03014416 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03087436 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004030051 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080266367 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11750960 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 11774542 | US |