This application is based upon prior filed Application No. PCT/GB2014/051895, filed Jun. 20, 2014, the entire subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This application relates to Single-Photon Avalanche Diodes (SPADs), and, in particular to, SPADs usable in ambient light sensing and ranging applications.
A SPAD is based on a p-n junction device biased beyond its breakdown region. The high reverse bias voltage generates a sufficient magnitude of electric field such that a single charge carrier introduced into the depletion layer of the device can cause a self-sustaining avalanche via impact ionization. The avalanche is quenched, either actively or passively to allow the device to be “reset” to detect further photons. The initiating charge carrier can be photo-electrically generated by way of a single incident photon striking the high field region. It is this feature which gives rise to the name “Single Photon Avalanche Diode”. This single photon detection mode of operation is often referred to as “Geiger Mode”.
Single photon counting devices output response to incident light intensity becomes significantly non-linear as intensity increases. This may be problematic for many applications, such as ambient light sensing and ranging. It may be desirable to provide a SPAD and/or SPAD array with a better linear output response to illumination levels.
A SPAD is disclosed. The SPAD may include an active region for detection of incident radiation, and a cover configured to shield part of the active region from the incident radiation. An array is also disclosed and includes SPADs arranged in rows and columns. A method for making the SPAD is also disclosed.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, by reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
An avalanche is triggered when reverse biasing a PN-junction to around the breakdown voltage. This effect can be used in two modes of operation. Commonly, the avalanche photodiodes are biased just below the breakdown voltage, the photocurrent remaining proportional to the incoming light intensity. Gain values of a few hundred are obtained in III-V semiconductors as well as in silicon.
SPADs are solid-state photo detectors which utilize the fact that p-n diodes can be stable for a finite time above their breakdown voltage. When an incident photon with sufficient energy to liberate an electron arrives, avalanche multiplication of the photo-generated electron occurs due to the high electric field. This produces a measurable current pulse signaling the arrival of the photon which negates the need for amplification due to the internal gain of the device.
Essentially SPADs are photodiodes that are biased above the breakdown voltage in the so-called Geiger mode. This mode of operation requires the introduction of a quenching mechanism to stop the avalanche process. Each incoming photon results in a strong current pulse of few nanoseconds duration. The device works as an optical Geiger counter.
Quenching is required to stop the avalanche process, which is done by reducing the SPAD's reverse bias below its breakdown voltage. The simplest quenching circuit is commonly referred to as passive quenching. Usually, passive quenching is simply performed by providing a resistance in series to the SPAD. The avalanche current self-quenches simply because it develops a voltage drop across the resistance (a high-value ballast load), reducing the voltage across the SPAD to below its breakdown voltage. After the quenching of the avalanche current, the SPAD's bias slowly recovers to at or above the breakdown voltage and the detector is ready to be triggered again.
An alternative to passive quenching is active quenching. There are a number of different active quenching arrangements, although in general active quenching refers to detection of a breakdown event by some subsequent digital logic connected to the SPAD output, and actively pulling the SPAD moving node to a voltage below breakdown, quenching the avalanche. Active quenching is desirable for several reasons, including a reduction in dead time, and improved photon counting rate at high light levels enabling a dynamic range extension. Active quenching is essential in many applications of SPAD technology.
Dead time is the time interval after detection of a photon, during which it is quenched and returned to its active state. During this time, no photons are detected by the SPAD. While actively quenching the SPAD will bring it to its active state more quickly after a detection event than with passive quenching, under high light levels (with many detection events), the SPAD can still spend a large fraction of its time inactive. This can lead to saturation and reduction in the number of photons detected by the SPAD. The result of this is that the SPAD output does not track the light level linearly, which causes problems in some applications. By the nature of their design, SPADs have no gain control mechanism to address this problem. It is proposed therefore, to attenuate the SPAD to improve output linearity.
Attenuation may be achieved by further reducing the SPAD's active area. This may be done by covering more of the breakdown region with a non-transmissive cover, which acts to block any photons incident on the cover surface. One way of doing this is to cover part of the breakdown region with a metal layer when forming the metal track and anode. The metal layer may completely cover the active area, except for one or more apertures 160. In this way, the only photons detected by the SPAD are those which pass through the aperture and onto the SPAD's active area.
In
The effect of the attenuation is to reduce the number of photons detected by the SPAD. In doing this, the SPAD does not need to be reset so often, and therefore the likelihood is reduced, of a photon arriving during a SPAD reset following a previous detection event. Consequently, fewer photons are missed by the SPAD, and linearity is maintained at higher incident light levels. This results in a more linear output response to light intensity.
In practical applications, the SPADs disclosed herein will be arranged in arrays. The attenuation levels chosen for particular arrays of SPADs will depend on the specific application, the likely illumination conditions and the acceptable level of non-linearity. For example, if the SPAD array is always likely to be used in situations where illumination levels are high, then an array of SPADs all having high attenuation (such as 1/117× attenuation) may be suitable. However, should illumination levels then fall, the detection rate may fall close to zero.
Consequently, for many practical applications, an array of SPADs with different attenuation levels may be advantageous. This allows an acceptably linear output to be achievable in a wide range of light conditions. In one embodiment, an array may comprise banks of SPADs, one or more having no attenuation, one or more having lesser attenuation (for example 1/1.73× attenuation) and one or more having greater attenuation (for example 1/117× attenuation). In very low light levels (less than 500 lux as illustrated in
Suitable logic 180 may be provided to select the appropriate SPAD outputs depending on illumination conditions. There are a number of different ways such logic 180 may be implemented. For example, the outputs of particular banks (having particular attenuation levels) may be selected if their count rate is measured to be over a certain lower threshold level, or between upper and lower threshold levels.
It should be appreciated that the above description is for illustration only and other embodiments and variations may be envisaged without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In particular, the specific levels of attenuation may be varied from those illustrated. SPADs according to the concepts described herein may have, depending on the embodiment, over 40% over 50%, over 75%, over 85%, over 95% or over 99% of the active area covered/shielded. Arrays may comprise any combination of such SPADs.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1311055.6 | Jun 2013 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2014/051895 | 6/20/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/202995 | 12/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4078243 | De Bar et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
9728659 | Hirigoyen | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20030160250 | Cova et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040132262 | Ayabe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050256349 | Matsuyama et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080075474 | Kawai | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080237769 | Okihara | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090184384 | Sanfilippo | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110169117 | McIntosh et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120205522 | Richardson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120262606 | Yagyu | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140104474 | Tange et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150293021 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160064579 | Hirigoyen | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1679749 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1840967 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2040308 | Mar 2009 | EP |
63-058977 | Mar 1988 | JP |
6358977 | Apr 1988 | JP |
2010056173 | Mar 2010 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Rochas et al., Single Photon Detector Fabricated in a Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor High-Voltage Technology, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 74, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 3263-3270. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160056185 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |