There exists many types of processes for fabricating micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometers or gyros. In order to produce a MEMS device that has low parasitic capacitance, multiple wafers must pass through multiple masking, etching and attachment steps in order to produce an effective MEMS device. The greater the number of processing steps, the greater the fabrication costs.
The present invention includes methods for producing a MEMS device from a single silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. An SOI wafer includes a silicon (Si) handle layer, a Si mechanism layer and an insulator layer located between the Si handle and Si mechanism layers. An example method includes etching active components from the Si mechanism layer. Then, the exposed surfaces of the Si mechanism layer is doped with boron. Next, portions of the insulator layer proximate to the etched active components of the Si mechanism layer are removed and the Si handle layer is etched proximate to the etched active components.
The etching of the handle layer is an anisotropic etch.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
As shown in
In one embodiment, the SOI wafer 20 is a P-type SOI wafer. The etching performed on the mechanism layer 24 is a silicon deep reactive ion etch (DRIE) that etches through the mechanism layer 24 all the way to the SiO2 layer 26 that acts as an etch stop. Thus, a predefined array/pattern of holes/cavities are formed in the mechanism layer 24
As shown in
The boron doping penetrates both the horizontal and vertical surfaces exposed in the etched mechanism layer 24. The silicon oxide layer 26 is resistant to boron doping thereby preventing doping the handle layer 28.
As shown in
As shown in
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6410361 | Dhuler et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
7138694 | Nunan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7190007 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090176370 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |