The present disclosure generally relates to sort probe assembly and repair.
In the manufacture of semiconductor devices, it is necessary that such devices be tested at the wafer level to evaluate their functionality. The process in which die in a wafer are tested is commonly referred to as “wafer sort.” Testing and determining design flaws at the die level offers several advantages. First, it allows designers to evaluate the functionality of new devices during development. Increasing packaging costs also make wafer sorting a viable cost saver, in that reliability of each die on a wafer may be tested before incurring the higher costs of packaging. Measuring reliability also allows the performance of the production process to be evaluated and production consistency rated, such as for example by “bin switching” whereby the performance of a wafer is downgraded because that wafer's performance did not meet the expected criteria.
Generally, two tests are conducted on devices at the wafer level. The first test is conducted to determine if the individual devices on the wafer are functional. A second test is conducted to determine a performance parameter for the good devices on the wafer. For example, currently wafers have hundreds to thousands of microprocessors. Each of these microprocessors is tested to determine if the microprocessor is good. The speed of the microprocessor is determined in a second test. Once measured, the speed of the microprocessor is saved and the location of the microprocessor on the wafer is noted. This information is used to sort the microprocessors based on performance at the time the wafer is sliced and diced to form individual dies, each of which has a microprocessor thereon.
Each device formed on a wafer has a number of electrical contacts. For example, testing an individual microprocessor commonly requires hundreds to thousands of different individual contacts to be made to the microprocessor on the wafer. Testing each contact requires more than merely touching each electrical contact. An amount of force must be applied to a contact to break through any oxide layer that may have been formed on the surface of the contact. Forming 3000 contacts, which are not all at the same height and not all in the same plane, is also difficult. As a result, a force has to be applied to the contacts to assure good electrical contact and to compensate for the lack of planarity among the contacts.
A membrane probe card is currently used to conduct high frequency sort and test procedures. The membrane probe card includes a rigid substrate and a large number of electrical probes. Probe card substrates have for example 500 to 7,000 probes or more depending, for example, on the microprocessor testing requirements. The probes include an attached end and a free end to contact individual electrical contacts on a device. Repair of a probe card substrate, such as when a probe is deformed (e.g., recessed) is generally work that has to be done by hand. For example, sort probe repair is currently carried out an operator physically accessing a damaged probe via a pair of tweezers, and mechanically manipulating the probe to place it at a desired location. Often, the operator will pull the probe a significant distance past the spacing between the probes during the repair process, causing the probe to bump and deform neighboring probes. As a result, otherwise fine probes are damaged and/or pushed out of original positions.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments. However, various embodiments of the invention may be practiced without the specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the particular embodiments of the invention.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in at least an implementation. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification may or may not be all referring to the same embodiment.
Referring again to
In one or more embodiments, robot 130 may have a robotic arm or other mechanical limb. The arm or limb may include an interconnected set of two or more links and one or more powered joints. In one or more embodiments, the arm or limb may allow rotation or movement in at least four axes. As is known, the flexibility or freedom of movement of the arm increases with increasing number of axes. The arm or limb may support and move an end-of-arm tooling or other end effector that is connected at the end of the arm or limb.
The end effector may allow the robot to perform certain intended functions, such as, for example, engaging with an item (e.g., a probe), holding and moving the item, and disengaging from the item. In one or more embodiments, the end effector may include gripper 140. Gripper 140 may serve as a “hand” to grasp, clasp, or otherwise engage with, hold and move, and disengage from an item.
Referring back to
Referring back to
During a probe gripping operation, actuator sleeve 330 slides down over gripper jaws 360. Upon coming in contact with actuator sleeve 330, gripper jaws 360 are closed, enabling gripping of a sort probe.
Gripper 300 is capable of generating up to one Newton of gripping force, enabling the manipulation of probes without losing hold. In a further embodiment, gripper enables current to be passed to a probe during repair, which heats up the probe in order to limit an amount of deformation required to manipulate the probe into position.
Referring back to
System 100 of
In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring again to
Other features of system 800 are similar to that of system 100 in
Although embodiments of the invention have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that claimed subject matter may not be limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as sample forms of implementing the claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2918646 | Davidson | Dec 1959 | A |
5495667 | Farnworth | Mar 1996 | A |
5568682 | Gates et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5590455 | Kato et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5975604 | Wolin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
7877876 | Burke et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8646676 | Nagao | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8701276 | Burke et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20030048108 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050062464 | Foster et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060021669 | Stark | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20100043224 | Burke et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120139365 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130269173 | Albertson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9616440 | May 1996 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2011/068229, Oct. 4, 2012, 11 pages. |
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/995,931, Apr. 20. 2015, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140091828 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |