The present application claims priority to Singapore Patent Application No. 10201803943 W, filed by Applicant National University of Singapore on May 10, 2018, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present disclosure relates generally to conversion of radio-frequency (RF) energy into direct current (DC) power, and more specifically to RF-to-DC converters that integrate a spintronic element (e.g., a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)) that operates as a rectifier into a structure (e.g., a split-ring resonator (SRR)) that acts as a RF energy absorber.
With the prevalence of RF wireless and telecommunication technologies, there is often considerable ambient (e.g., waste) RF energy that, if it could be efficiently harvested, would provide an environmental-friendly power solution. Harvesting RF energy may be a desirable power source for a number of types of devices, including wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Sensors using RF harvesting technology may work in a variety of situations, and have the potential for long sensor life cycles. Harvesting RF energy provides advantages over other energy harvesting technologies. For example, it may provide greater flexibility, as RF can be obtained from ambient sources, or from a dedicated transmitter if there is not sufficient ambient RF available. Given its potential, RF-to-DC conversion has become a hot spot of research.
Conventional RF-to-DC converters typically include Schottky diodes that operate as rectifiers, and separate antennas that operate as RF energy absorbers. A Schottky diode is a semiconductor diode with a very fast switching action, but a low forward voltage drop. In a Schottky diode, a semiconductor-metal junction is formed, creating a Schottky barrier. The semiconductor acts as a cathode and the metal side acts as the anode of the diode. The cathode and anode are coupled to the antenna that absorbs RF energy and feeds it to the Schottky diode. The antenna is typically a separate entity, and impedance matching circuits are typically required to solve impedance matching issues.
While RF-to-DC converters including Schottky diodes are functional, they suffer a number of disadvantages. Schottky diodes, and their required circuitry (e.g., the impedance matching circuits), are relatively large, and pose significant obstacles to device scaling. Further, Schottky diode-based devices are already rapidly approaching to their theoretical limits for RF-to-DC conversion. Accordingly, there is little room for further energy harvesting efficiency improvement.
Thus, there is a need for a new type of RF-to-DC converter that may provide improved compactness, scalability, energy harvesting efficiency, and/or other advantages.
In example embodiments, an RF-to-DC converter includes one or more unit cells that integrate a spintronic element (e.g., a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)) into a conductor ring RF energy absorber (e.g., a split-ring resonator (SRR)). A RF-to-DC converter that includes one or more MTJ-integrated SRR unit cells may provide improved compactness, as each unit cell includes its own independent SRR and integrated MTJ; increased scalability, as multiple unit cells may be connected into an array to increase DC power output; and improved energy harvesting efficiency, as a MTJ may be much more sensitive than a Schottky diode and the SRR of each unit cell may directly feed energy to a MTJ without impedance matching circuits.
In one specific example embodiment, an RF-to-DC converter includes one or more MTJ-integrated SRR unit cells. Each MTJ-integrated SRR unit cell includes a conductor ring for absorbing RF energy, having a first electrode, a second electrode, and a gap that electrically uncouples the first electrode and second electrodes from each other. A MTJ element for converting absorbed RF energy to DC power is electrically connected to the first electrode and the second electrode. The MTJ element includes a MTJ that covers at least a portion of an area of the MTJ element.
It should be understood that a variety of additional features and alternative embodiments may be implemented other than those discussed in this Summary. This Summary is intended simply as a brief introduction to the reader, and does not indicate or imply that the examples mentioned herein cover all aspects of the disclosure, or are necessary or essential aspects of the disclosure.
The description below refers to the accompanying drawings of example embodiments, of which:
As used herein, the term “substrate” should be interpreted to refer to a structure to which one or more materials, or one or more layers of material, may be deposited thereon.
As used herein, the term “layer” should be interpreted to refer to a level or to thickness of a structure that is distinguishable from another level or thickness of another structure. A layer may comprise the same, or different materials, from the other structure. The layer and the other structure may be the same or different in properties (e.g., size, shape, etc.), as long as they are distinguishable from each other. A layer may comprise one or more sub-layers or intermediate layers, which themselves may also be distinguishable from adjacent layers.
As used herein, the terms “coupled” and “connected” are intended to cover both directly connected, or connected through one or more intermediate structures, unless otherwise stated.
As used herein, the term “and/or” (e.g., as in “X and/or Y”) should be interpreted to mean either “and” or “or” (e.g., as in “X and Y” or “X or Y”).
Further, as used herein, the term “substantially” should be understood to include, exactly or completely, and also to include within a reasonable variation, defined as a variation of no more than +/−5% when used in reference to a value.
Dimensions (e.g., a, b, d, e, g, w, l in
The example MTJ-integrated SRR 100 of
When the frequency of the incident RF coincides with the intrinsic resonance frequency of the MTJ-integrated SRR 100, maximum RF energy will be transferred to the latter. The MTJ-integrated SRR 100 can be represented by an equivalent circuit consisting of a resistor R (due to the MTJ and conductor resistance), an inductor L (due to the conductor ring 120) and a capacitor C (due to the gap 150) connected in series. Hence, resonance of the MTJ-integrated SRR 100 is due to RLC circuit resonance. By changing the dimensions of the SRR (e.g., such as l, w, g, e, and/or ring-width) one can change the resonance frequency f=½π√{square root over (LC)} to match the RF frequency to be harvested. For example, changing the dimensions of the SRR one may change the resonance frequency to match the 2.4 GHz frequency of the popular WiFi-band.
Operation of the example MTJ-integrated SRR 100 may be verified by finite-element simulation.
To emphasize the merits of such a MTJ-integrated SRR structure over a simple structure in which the MTJ is fed directly by a transmission line, simulation may be conducted with the MTJ element 110 being directly fed by a microstrip feed line.
Operation of the MTJ element 110 to convert harvested RF energy into DC power may be further considered. A DC current/voltage appears across the first (e.g., top) and bottom (e.g., bottom) electrode of the MTJ element 110, which can be harvested via electrical leads to power a load (e.g., represented by the test resistor 510 in above discussed simulation model). The ability to tap this DC current/voltage is assured due to the presence of the gap 150 that prevents current shunting of this DC voltage, while allowing AC resonance for maximum RF absorption.
It has been shown that a MTJ can be used as a rectifier to convert a RF energy into a DC power in a process referred to as the spin-torque diode (STD) effect. In the STD effect, a sinusoidal microwave current injected into the MTJ excites a magnetization precession in the magnetic layers via spin-torque transfer, resulting in tunnelling magneto-resistance (TMR) oscillations that rectify with the microwave current to produce a DC current. It has been shown that MTJ-based rectifiers can achieve sensitivities (e.g., upwards of 12,000 mV mW−1 or even 75,400 mV mW−1) that are far higher than even the theoretical thermodynamic limit (e.g., 4000 mV mW−1) for conventional Schottky diodes at low input microwave powers. The high sensitivity of STD is mainly attributed to the highly efficient spin-torque spin excitation by RF current, which can be achieved even under zero magnetic field bias. Further, MTJs have the potential to be far more compact than Schottky diodes. The actual MTJ of a MTJ element 110 may be a nano-pillar of a few hundred nanometres or less in diameter, while a Schottky diodes is typically on the order of millimetres.
The rectification mechanism in a MTJ is very different than that in a Schottky diode. Current density passing through the MTJ J may be given as:
J=Jdc+Jac cos(2πft) (1)
where Jdc and Jac are the applied DC current and AC microwave current respectively. When the current density J passes through the MTJ fixed layer/MgO/free layer stack 312, 314, 316, oscillations of the free layer 312 generate free layer spins {circumflex over (m)}, which in turn results in oscillations of the TMR. The TMR oscillations then rectify with the AC microwave at the same frequency to give rise to a DC voltage. The dynamics of the free layer spins {circumflex over (m)} is given by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert-Slonczewski (LLGS) equation:
where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, d is the free layer thickness, e is the electronic charge, ℏ is the reduced Planck's constant, P is the spin polarization, β is the angle between the fixed and free layer magnetization and b is the ratio of the in-plane spin-torque (ST) {right arrow over (τ)}IP and out-of-plane (OOP) field-like ST {right arrow over (τ)}OOP magnitudes, and êp is the unit vector in the direction of the fixed magnetization. Here, the effective field {right arrow over (H)}eff is given as:
{right arrow over (H)}eff={right arrow over (H)}+(1/μ0Ms)dE/d{circumflex over (m)}+ΔHs cos(2πft)cos θ (3)
where {right arrow over (H)} is the applied static field, ΔHs is voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy (VCMA), μ0 is the permeability and E is the magnetic energy. The VCMA field ΔHs may act like an AC field torque at frequency f to drive the spin precession, in addition to AC {right arrow over (τ)}IP and {right arrow over (τ)}OOP driving torques induced by the microwave current Jac. The spin polarization P is related to the MTJ resistance R by:
R−1=G0(1+P2 cos β) (4)
where G0 is the mid-point conductance.
Because of the spin-torque term (3rd term in equation (2), the excitation of {circumflex over (m)} oscillations can be highly efficient for nano-scale MTJs with a large TMR value, resulting in large amplitude resistance oscillations that rectify the microwave current to a large DC voltage, giving rise to a high sensitivity for AC-to-DC conversion that can far exceed that of semiconductor Schottky diodes.
One or more MTJ-integrated SRRs 100 may be utilized as unit cells of a RF-to-DC converter to enable scaling. The MTJ-integrated SRR unit cells may be organized into an array with parallel and series elements.
To test an RF-to-DC converter that includes an array of MTJ-integrated SRR unit cells, simulations may be performed.
It should be understood that various adaptations and modifications may be made to the above-discussed RF-to-DC converter that includes one or more MTJ-integrated SRRs. Various elements described above may be made from differing materials, substituted for different elements, implemented in different combinations or otherwise arranged or used differently without departing from the intended scope of the disclosure. Example embodiments are not necessarily mutually exclusive as some may be combined with one or more others to form new example embodiments. Figures are not drawn to scale and relative relationships in size may be exaggerated for clarity in presentation. The example embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10201803943W | May 2018 | SG | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20110181303 | Xiao | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20140266967 | Ramahi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160308402 | Alavikia et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170346193 | AlShareef et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105895675 | Aug 2016 | CN |
106469860 | Mar 2017 | CN |
3046181 | Jul 2016 | EP |
WO-2018021973 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alavikia, Babak, et al., “Complementary Split Ring Resonator Arrays for Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting,” AIP Publishing LLC, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 107, Jul. 21, 2015, pp. 1-5. |
Aljaloud, Khaled, et al., “A Compact Rectenna Using Split Ring Resonator for Energy Harvesting,” IEEE, IEEE Xplore, 2017 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition, London, UK, May 30, 2017-Jun. 1, 2017, pp. 1-2. |
Fang, Bin, et al., “Giant Spin-Torque Diode Sensitivity in the Absence of Bias Magnetic Field,” Nature Communication, Article, Apr. 7, 2016, pp. 1-7. |
Fang, Bin, et al., “Spintronic Nano-Scale Harvester of Broadband Microwave Energy,” arXiv.org, Jan. 1, 2018, pp. 1-29. |
Fowler, C., et al., “A Metamaterial-Inspired Approach to RF Energy Harvesting,” arXiv.org, May 7, 2017, pp. 1-11. |
Fu, L., et al., “Microwave Reflection Imaging Using a Magnetic Tunnel Junction Based Spintronic Microwave Sensor,” American Institute of Physics, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, Dec. 5, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
Hemour, Simon, et al., “Towards Low-Power High-Efficiency RF and Microwave Energy Harvesting,” IEEE, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, No. 4, Apr. 2014, pp. 965-976. |
Maedler, Carsten, et al., “Wireless Transfer of Power by a 35GHz Metamaterial Split-Ring Resonator Rectenna,” arXiv.org, Aug. 4, 2016, pp. 1-8. |
Miwa, S., et al., “Highly Sensitive Nanoscale Spin-Torque Diode,” Nature Materials, Articles, vol. 13, Oct. 20, 2013, pp. 50-56. |
Shi, Yanyan, et al., “Design of a Novel Compact and Efficient Rectenna for WiFi Energy Harvesting,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research C, Pier C, vol. 83, Jan. 2018, pp. 57-70. |
Tulapurkar, A. A., et al., “Spin-Torque Diode Effect in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” Nature Publishing Group, Nature, Letters, vol. 438, Nov. 17, 2005, pp. 339-342. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190348869 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |