Those skilled in the art know that spin transfer can be used as an alternative to, or in addition to, an external magnetic field in switching current perpendicular to plane (CPP) configurations of magnetic elements, otherwise known as ST-RAM cells, which may be either of the magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) type or of the spin valve (SV) type. When a spin-polarized current passes through a free magnetic layer of a magnetic element, a portion of the spin angular momentum of the electrons incident on the free layer is transferred to the free layer. A spin transfer effect, that is caused by conduction electrons traveling from a reference magnetic layer of the magnetic element to the free magnetic layer, switches the magnetization orientation of the free layer from antiparallel, with the magnetization orientation of the reference layer, to parallel, with the magnetization orientation of the reference layer; and, a spin transfer effect that is caused by conduction electrons traveling in the opposite direction, switches the magnetization orientation of the free layer from parallel with the magnetization orientation of the reference layer back to antiparallel.
The free magnetic layer should be thick enough, compared with the spin diffusion length (SDL), to allow for efficient spin torque transfer from the spin polarized current passing therethrough. For a free magnetic layer formed by a NiFeCo alloy, the SDL for efficient spin torque transfer is on the order of 100 nm, yet a typical thickness of this free layer is approximately 5 nm or less. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that increasing a thickness of this free layer is not a desirable option, since the switching current requirement is proportional to the thickness of the layer; in addition, a thicker free magnetic layer creates a larger fringe magnetic field that can interfere with neighboring elements, particularly in a densely packed memory system. Thus, the present disclosure pertains to magnetic elements, or ST-RAM cells, having configurations facilitating a relatively dense packing of the elements and a relatively low switching current for the elements.
A current perpendicular to plane (CPP) magnetic element for a memory device, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure, includes a free magnetic layer, which has an electronically reflective surface. According to some alternate embodiments, a CPP magnetic element includes a permanent magnet layer, which has perpendicular anisotropy, in order to bias a free magnetic layer of the magnetic element. According to yet further embodiments, a CPP magnetic element includes both a reflective surface of the free magnetic layer, and the permanent magnet layer having perpendicular anisotropy.
The following drawings are illustrative of particular embodiments of the disclosure and therefore do not limit the scope. The drawings are not to scale (unless so stated) and are intended for use in conjunction with the explanations in the following detailed description. Embodiments of the disclosure will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, wherein like numerals denote like elements.
The following detailed description is exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration in any way. Rather, the following description provides practical illustrations for implementing exemplary embodiments.
Two representative spin-up conduction electrons e, of a plurality of spin-up conduction electrons of a switching current are shown traveling, from left to right, through magnetic element 10, according to two different paths. As previously described above, a thickness of layer FL is preferably on the order of 5 nm or less, so that the thickness of layer FL does not provide an adequate SDL to allow enough of the plurality of electrons of the switching current to be spin-flipped for an efficient spin torque transfer effect to switch layer FL; electrons e, when traveling along the path indicated by the solid line arrow of
Reflective surface R may be formed on layer FL via a low energy ion bombardment process (i.e. sputtering), which is known to those skilled in the art; suitable materials for forming surface R are conductive and include, without limitation, Copper (Cu), Gold (Au), Ruthenium (Ru), Platinum (Pt), Bismuth (Bi), Niobium (Nb) and Chromium (Cr), Hafnium (Hf) and Zirconium (Zr), as well as conductive oxides such as RuO2, IrO2 and CoFeOx. According to preferred embodiments, reflective surface R is formed to be as atomically flat, or smooth, as possible, in order to approach perfect specular reflection, however such a specular reflective surface is not essential. It should be noted that reflective surface R is preferably not 100% reflective to allow passage of the current therethrough. According to some embodiments, the layer forming electrode E is also reflective.
A particular process which may be used to form reflective surface R is described by Egelhoff et al. in their article entitled: “Oxygen as a surfactant in the growth of giant magnetoresistive spin valves” (J. Appl. Phys. 82 (12), 15 Dec. 1997). On page 6149 of the article, Egelhoff et al. describe forming a capping layer on a bottom spin valve sample by exposing the top Co layer of the sample to ˜10−4 Torrs of O2 to produce ˜0.4 nm CoO, depositing ˜0.4 nm Ta, and exposing the sample to air to oxidize the Ta. The giant magnetoresistance (GMR) and resistance demonstrated by spin valves incorporating such a capping layer suggest to Egelhoff et al. an increase in specular scattering due to the capping layer.
Another group of embodiments of the present disclosure incorporates an in-stack perpendicular bias; the bias helps to start the switching of the magnetization orientation of the free layer when a switching current is applied, so that a relatively lower switching current may be effective.
Both of elements 50, 60 are shown including first and second electrodes E1 and E2 terminating either end of the stack, bottom and top, respectively. Although
According to the illustrated embodiments, each permanent magnet layer PML has a perpendicular anisotropy, which is indicated by the upward pointing arrow, in order to produce a biasing field that facilitates switching. Some examples of suitable materials for layer PML include, without limitation, CoPt, TbCoFe and CoPd; and some examples of suitable materials for decoupling layer DL include, without limitation, Ta, Ru, Ta/Ru and Cu. A thickness of layer PML may from tens of nanometers to many micrometers, while a thickness of layer DL may be from one nanometer to many micrometers. Although
In the foregoing detailed description, embodiments of the disclosure have been described. These implementations, as well as others, are within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/108,706, filed Apr. 24, 2008, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6532164 | Redon et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6700753 | Singleton et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714444 | Huai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6829161 | Huai et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838740 | Huai et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847547 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6888742 | Nguyen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6933155 | Albert et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958927 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6967863 | Huai | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6985385 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992359 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995959 | Ju et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006375 | Covington | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7057921 | Valet | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7088609 | Valet | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110287 | Huai et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126202 | Huai et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139188 | Moore et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154769 | Krieger et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161829 | Huai et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190611 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224598 | Perner | May 2007 | B2 |
7230845 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233039 | Huai et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241631 | Huai et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7242045 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7242048 | Huai | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245462 | Huai et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7369427 | Diao et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7430135 | Huai et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7463458 | Aono | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486551 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7486552 | Apalkov et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7489541 | Pakala et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7518835 | Huai et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7576956 | Huai | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7826256 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7940551 | Zheng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20060018057 | Huai | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060049472 | Diao et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060901 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070177421 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090050991 | Nagai et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090109581 | Fukuzawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090180308 | Inomata et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090302403 | Nguyen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100078742 | Zheng et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 903 624 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 970 911 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1 918 937 | May 2008 | EP |
93 08258 | Apr 1993 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110254113 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12108706 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 13169449 | US |