The present invention relates generally to microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to a MEMS die with improved stress isolation.
Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices are semiconductor devices with embedded mechanical components. MEMS devices include, for example, pressure sensors, accelerometers, gyroscopes, microphones, digital mirror displays, micro fluidic devices, and so forth. MEMS devices are used in a variety of products such as automobile airbag systems, control applications in automobiles, navigation, display systems, inkjet cartridges, and so forth.
There are significant challenges to be surmounted in the packaging of MEMS devices due at least in part to the necessity for the MEMS devices to interact with the outside environment, the fragility of many types of MEMS devices, and severe cost constraints. Indeed, many MEMS device applications require smaller size and low cost packaging to meet aggressive cost targets. The packaging of MEMS sensor applications often uses materials with dissimilar coefficients of thermal expansion. As such, a high thermally induced stress can develop during MEMS device manufacture or operation. These thermal stresses, as well as stresses due to moisture and assembly processes, can result in deformation of the underlying substrate, referred to herein as package stress. Variations in package stress can cause instability of the MEMS device and output shifts in the MEMS device.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar items throughout the Figures, the Figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and:
As the uses for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices continue to grow and diversify, increasing emphasis is being placed on smaller size and low cost packaging without sacrificing part performance. Embodiments entail a MEMS die and a method of a MEMS die for improved stress isolation. In particular, a MEMS device is created through the execution of relatively simple methodology on a cantilevered platform structure which is connected to a bulk substrate at a sole attachment point. Such a configuration enables isolation of the MEMS device from outside stresses, such as packaging and/or thermal stresses.
Referring now to
MEMS die 20 generally includes a bulk substrate 22, a structural layer 24 fixed to a surface 26 of bulk substrate 22, and a MEMS device 28 formed on, or alternatively in, structural layer 24. MEMS die 20 further includes bond pads 30 on structural layer 24 and conductive traces 32 interconnected between MEMS device 28 and bond pads 30. Conductive traces 32 suitably electrically couple MEMS device 28 with bond pads 30. Bond pads 30 may be utilized to electrically connect MEMS device 28 to external components, such as an integrated circuit die, not shown herein for simplicity. MEMS die 20 may include additional components such as a cap layer, overmolding, and the like, also not shown herein for simplicity.
In accordance with an embodiment, bulk substrate 22 has a recess 34 extending inwardly from surface 26, and structural layer 24 is fixed to surface 26 of bulk substrate 22 surrounding recess 34. A material portion of structural layer 24 is removed surrounding MEMS device 28 to form a cantilevered platform structure 36 at which MEMS device 28 resides. Thus, cantilevered platform structure 36 is formed in structural layer 24 and resides over recess 34.
Cantilevered platform structure 36 includes a platform 38 and an arm 40 extending from platform 38. A first end 42 of arm 40 is fixed to platform 38, and a second end 44 of arm 40 is fixed to bulk substrate 22. More particularly, second end 44 of arm 40 is fixed to bulk substrate 22 via an attachment of arm 40 to a portion of structural layer 24 fixed to surface 26 of bulk substrate 22. Thus, once the material portion of structural layer 24 is removed, an opening 46 extends through structural layer 24 and partially surrounds cantilevered platform structure 36. Accordingly, platform 38 and arm 40 are suspended over recess 34, with second end 44 of arm 40 being the sole attachment point of cantilevered platform structure 36 to the surrounding bulk substrate 22. The terms “first” and “second” used herein do not refer to an ordering or prioritization of elements within a countable series of elements. Rather, the terms “first” and “second” are used to distinguish the particular elements for clarity of discussion.
In the illustrated embodiment, bulk substrate 22 exhibits a thickness 48, and structural layer 24 exhibits a thickness 50 that is less than thickness 48 of bulk substrate 22. Additionally, recess 34 is defined by a depth 52 that is less than thickness 48 of bulk substrate 22. That is, recess 34 extends only partially through substrate 22. Additionally, recess 34 exhibits a first area defined by a length 56 and a width 58 of a rectangular shape of recess 34. The first area, defined by length 56 and width 58, is substantially parallel to a second area defined by a length 60 and a width 62 of the rectangular shape of platform 38. Length 56 and width 58 of recess 34 are greater than the corresponding length 60 and width 62 of platform 38 so that platform 38 does not contact edges 64 of bulk substrate 22 that surround recess 34. This difference in areas defines the width of opening 46 between platform 38 and edges 64 of bulk substrate 22.
The illustrated configuration yields MEMS device 22 formed on a cantilevered platform structure 36 that is suspended over recess 34. Moreover, cantilevered platform structure 36 merely extends through the thickness of structural layer 24, instead of extending through the bulk, i.e., the entirety, of substrate 22. This cantilevered platform structure can achieve the benefits of improved package stress isolation, improved device performance, and a simplified package which reduces package costs.
Now referring to
The methodology of
In a block 72 of MEMS die fabrication process 70, recess 34 is formed in bulk substrate 22. In a block 74, a second substrate (e.g., structural layer 24) is attached to surface 26 of bulk substrate 22 over recess 34. In a block 76, MEMS device 28, conductive traces 32, and bond pads 30 are formed on the second substrate. In a block 78, a portion of the second substrate is etched, sawn, or otherwise removed to form cantilevered platform structure 36. Ellipses following block 78 represent additional operations that may ensue during the execution of MEMS die fabrication process 70. These additional operations may include, for example, wafer level testing, singulation of a wafer structure of the first and second substrates having a plurality of cantilevered platform structures and MEMS devices formed thereon, attachment of a lid, wirebonding with an application specific integrated circuit, overmolding, and so forth. These additional operations are not described herein for brevity.
An embodiment of a MEMS die includes a substrate having a recess formed therein and a cantilevered platform structure having a platform and an arm extending from the platform. The platform and the arm are suspended over the recess, the arm is fixed to the substrate, and a MEMS device resides on the platform.
An embodiment of a method of making a MEMS die includes forming a recess in a substrate, the recess extending from a first surface of the recess, and fixing a cantilevered platform structure to the substrate. The cantilevered platform structure has a platform and an arm extending from the platform, wherein the fixing attaches the arm to the substrate and suspends the platform and the arm over the recess. The method further includes forming a MEMS device on the platform.
Thus, a MEMS die is created through the execution of relatively simple methodology on a cantilevered platform structure which is connected to a bulk substrate at a sole attachment point. Such a cantilevered platform structure enables isolation of a MEMS device residing on the cantilevered platform structure from outside stresses, such as packaging and/or thermal stresses. Accordingly, the cantilevered platform structure can achieve the benefits of improved package stress isolation for the MEMS device, improved device performance, and a simplified package which reduces package costs.
The preceding detailed description is merely illustrative in nature and is not intended to limit the embodiments of the subject matter or the application and uses of such embodiments. As used herein, the word “exemplary” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as exemplary is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, or detailed description.
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or embodiments described herein are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the claimed subject matter in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the described embodiment or embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope defined by the claims, which includes known equivalents and foreseeable equivalents at the time of filing this patent application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5488862 | Neukermans et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5770883 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5850042 | Warren | Dec 1998 | A |
5914801 | Dhuler et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6215137 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6433401 | Clark et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7019231 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7280014 | Potter | Oct 2007 | B2 |
8049287 | Combi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8304275 | Schlarmann et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8648432 | Haeusler | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20050172717 | Wu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20080016683 | Brida et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080290430 | Mahadevan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100019393 | Hsieh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100315938 | Ascanio et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130214365 | Schlarmann et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140252512 | Yang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150115387 | Buckley et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160051131 | Jeong et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
OA from U.S. Appl. No. 14/564,340 dated Feb. 19, 2016. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,598, 17 pages dated Jun. 24, 2016. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 14/564,340, 19 pages dates Jun. 16, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160096724 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |