1. Field of the Invention
This application relates generally to processing substrates. More particularly, this application relates to the deposition of films onto a substrate and equipment configured for the same.
2. Description of the Related Art
As is well known, substrate processing methods and equipment are often employed for semiconductor processing and for the fabrication of integrated circuits, which entails particularly stringent quality demands, but such processing is also employed in a variety of other fields. For example, semiconductor processing techniques are often employed in the fabrication of flat panel displays using a wide variety of technologies and in the fabrication of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).
A variety of methods are used in substrate processing to deposit materials onto surfaces. For example, one of the most widely used methods in the semiconductor manufacturing industry is chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”), in which atoms or molecules contained in a vapor deposit on a wafer and build up to form a film. However, existing processes tend to produce films that are non-uniform across the surface of a wafer, resulting in lower quality and yield, and thus, higher costs. Uniformity is often sought by adjusting the parameters of the CVD process, such as by controlling the temperature, pressure, and flow rates of the process gases to and across the surface of the wafer substrate. This adjustment of CVD process parameters is known as “tuning.”
In some contexts, it is desirable to deposit selectively within semiconductor windows exposed among fields of different materials, such as field isolation oxide. Selective deposition means that a film, such as silicon, is deposited on a first portion of the surface of the substrate at a greater mean rate than on a second portion of the same surface. Selectivity takes advantage of differential nucleation and/or formation of different crystal morphology during deposition on disparate materials, and typically comprises simultaneous etching and deposition of the material being deposited. The precursor of choice will generally have a tendency to form more rapidly on one surface and less rapidly on another surface. For example, silane will generally nucleate on both silicon oxide and silicon, but there is a longer nucleation phase on silicon oxide. At the beginning of a nucleation stage, discontinuous films on oxide have a high exposed surface area relative to merged, continuous films on silicon. Similarly, the growth on the insulating regions (e.g., silicon oxide) can be amorphous or polycrystalline whereas growth on the semiconductor windows (e.g., silicon) can be epitaxial. Accordingly, an etchant added to the process will have a greater effect upon the poorly nucleating film on the oxide as compared to the more rapidly nucleating film on the silicon. Similarly, an etchant can be more effective against amorphous or polycrystalline growth, whether from a prior deposition or during deposition, than against epitaxial growth. The relative selectivity of a process can thus be improved by tuning the precursor and vapor etchant as discussed above. Typically, a selective deposition process is tuned to produce the highest deposition rate feasible on the window of interest while accomplishing no deposition in the other regions.
Known selective silicon deposition processes include reactants such as silane and hydrochloric acid with a hydrogen carrier gas. Co-owned and co-pending U.S. Patent Application Publication No. U.S. 2006/0234504 A1, entitled “SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF SILICON-CONTAINING FILMS,” teaches processes that employ trisilane as a silicon source and chlorine gas as an etchant. These selective deposition processes show improved uniformity, purity, deposition speed and repeatability. However, strong exothermic reactions have been observed, potentially leading to premature reactant breakdown, damage to the gas intermixing tank, combustion, and substrate contamination. Other selective deposition chemistries are also subject to excessive reactivity.
One embodiment provides a reactor for processing substrates, comprising a reaction chamber and a substrate support for supporting a substrate inside the reaction chamber. The reactor comprises a first gas delivery path configured to convey a first gas from a first reactant source to a mixing space, and a second gas delivery path configured to convey a second gas from a second reactant source to the mixing space. The reactor comprises a first set of adjustable gas injectors that inject the first gas into the mixing space and control a gas flow profile of the first gas into the mixing space. The reactor further comprises a second set of adjustable gas injectors that inject the second gas into the mixing space and control a gas flow profile of the second gas into the mixing space. The first and second gases mix at the mixing space and form a common flow path from the mixing space to the substrate support. The common flow path has no flow restrictions between the mixing space and the substrate support.
Another embodiment provides a reactor for processing substrates, comprising a reaction chamber defining a reaction space and a substrate support for supporting a substrate inside the reaction chamber. A first gas delivery path is configured to convey a first gas from a first reactant source to the reaction space, and a second gas delivery path is configured to convey a second gas from a second reactant source to the reaction space. A first set of adjustable gas injectors injects the first gas into the reaction space and controls a gas flow profile of the first gas into the reaction space. A second set of adjustable gas injectors injects the second gas into the reaction space and controls a gas flow profile of the second gas into the reaction space, wherein the first and second gases initially mix within the reaction space.
Another embodiment provides an apparatus for selectively forming a semiconductor film on a substrate. The apparatus comprises a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactor, a substrate support, first and second inlet sets of one or more inlets, and first and second reactant sources. The CVD reactor comprises a reaction space within which the substrate support supports a substrate. The first and second inlet sets are in fluid communication with the reaction space. The first reactant source is configured to supply a precursor for semiconductor deposition to the first inlet set, and the second reactant source is configured to supply an etchant to the second inlet set. The inlet sets and sources define separate flow paths for the precursor and the etchant to a mixing space within the reaction space, wherein the first and second inlet sets are disposed on the same wall of the mixing space.
Another embodiment provides a method for processing substrates in a reaction chamber. The method comprises providing a substrate within a reaction chamber. A first gas is conveyed from a first reactant source to a mixing space through a first gas delivery path, and a second gas is conveyed from a second reactant source to the mixing space through a second gas delivery path. A first set of injectors is adjusted to inject the first gas into the mixing space and control a gas flow profile of the first gas into the mixing space. Likewise, a second set of injectors is adjusted to inject the second gas into the mixing space and control a gas flow profile of the second gas into the mixing space. The method comprises causing the first and second gases to mix at the mixing space and flow along a common flow path from the mixing space to the substrate, wherein the common flow path has no flow restrictions between the mixing space and the substrate.
Another embodiment provides a method for processing substrates in a reaction chamber. The method comprises conveying a first gas from a first reactant source through a first gas delivery path to a reaction space, and conveying a second gas from a second reactant source through a second gas delivery path to the reaction space. A first set of injectors is adjusted to inject the first gas into the reaction space and control a gas profile of the first gas into the reaction space. Likewise, a second set of injectors is adjusted to inject the second gas into the reaction space and control a gas profile of the second gas into the reaction space. The first and second gases mix within the reaction space.
Another embodiment provides a method for selectively forming a semiconductor film on a substrate. The method comprises providing a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactor comprising a reaction space. The substrate is supported within the reaction space with a substrate support. A precursor for semiconductor deposition is conveyed from a first reactant source to a first inlet set of one or more inlets in fluid communication with the reaction space. An etchant is conveyed from a second reactant source to a second inlet set of one or more inlets in fluid communication with the reaction space. The inlet sets and sources define separate flow paths for the precursor and the etchant to a mixing space within the reaction space. The first and second inlet sets are disposed on the same wall of the mixing space.
For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the prior art, certain objects and advantages of the invention have been described above and as further described below. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.
These and other aspects of the invention will be readily apparent from the following description and from the appended drawings (not to scale), which are meant to illustrate and not to limit the invention, and in which:
Supplying substrate processing equipment that can execute a selective deposition process and still mitigate the reactivity issues described above in the Background section may have an impact on the equipment manufacturer or user. Replacing an entire CVD processing system can be cost prohibitive, and the compatibility of a selective deposition-capable equipment design with an existing system may increase the system's footprint in a semiconductor fabrication facility. An equipment design that provides selective deposition capability must also maximize tuning capability as discussed above while providing accessibility to the equipment for the user.
In many selective deposition processes, Si-containing layers are selectively formed over single crystal semiconductor materials while minimizing and more preferably avoiding deposition over adjacent dielectrics. Examples of dielectric materials include silicon dioxide (including low dielectric constant forms such as carbon-doped or fluorine-doped), silicon nitride, metal oxide and metal silicate. More generally, patterned or mixed substrates have two or more different types of surfaces. There are various ways that the surfaces of a mixed substrate can be different from each other. For example, the surfaces can have different material compositions, different crystal morphologies and/or different electrical properties.
Even if the materials are made from the same composition, surfaces can be different if the morphologies, i.e., the crystallinity of the surfaces, are different. The processes described herein are useful for depositing Si-containing films on a variety of substrates, but are particularly useful for mixed substrates having mixed surface morphologies. A mixed substrate with a mixed surface morphology is a substrate that includes a first surface having a first surface crystal structure and a second, different surface crystal structure. Amorphous, polycrystalline and single crystal are examples of different morphologies.
Epitaxial deposition refers to the deposition of a crystalline semiconductor material onto a crystalline substrate in such a way that the deposited layer adopts or follows the lattice constant of the substrate. Epitaxial deposition may be homoepitaxial or heteroepitaxial. Homoepitaxial deposition occurs when the deposited layer is formed of the same material as that of the substrate, such as epitaxially depositing a layer of silicon on a single-crystal silicon substrate. Heteroepitaxial deposition occurs when the composition of the deposited layer differs from that of the substrate, such as when epitaxially depositing germanium or silicon germanium on a single-crystal silicon substrate.
Epitaxial films are characterized by a crystal structure and orientation that is identical to the substrate upon which they are grown. Typically, the substrate is a single crystal, such that the epitaxial film is also a single crystal. The atoms in these materials are arranged in a consistent lattice-like structure that persists over relatively long distances on an atomic scale. By contrast, amorphous morphology is a non-crystalline structure having a low degree of order because the atoms lack a definite repetitive arrangement. Other morphologies include microcrystalline and mixtures of amorphous and crystalline material. As used herein, a “single-crystal” structure is implied by epitaxial deposition and is used to describe a predominantly large crystal structure that may have a tolerable number of faults therein, as is commonly employed for transistor fabrication. The skilled artisan will appreciate that crystallinity of a layer generally falls along a continuum from amorphous to polycrystalline to single-crystal; the skilled artisan can readily determine when a crystal structure can be considered single-crystal or epitaxial, despite low density faults. The skilled artisan will understand that the methods and apparatuses described herein for depositing Si-containing films onto mixed or patterned substrates having two types of surfaces may also be applied to mixed substrates having three or more different types of surfaces.
The gases from the reactant sources 10, 20 can be used in a selective deposition process. Selective deposition means that a film, such as silicon, is deposited on a first portion of the surface of the substrate 80 at a greater mean rate than on a second portion of the same surface. In some selective deposition embodiments, the rate of semiconductor deposition on the second portion may be approximately the same rate at which silicon is etched away, resulting in an effective deposition rate of zero on the second portion. Cyclical deposition and etching can have the same effect. Selective formation processes using a precursor for semiconductor deposition from the first reactant source 10 and an etchant from the second reactant source 20 show excellent selectivity and deposition speed. Generally, selective deposition processes result in net deposition rates over semiconductor areas being greater than 5 times, and preferably greater than 10 times, rates of deposition over insulators and semiconductor windows. Fully selective processes result in no net deposition over insulators or metals. Net deposition rates are calculated over the entire process, whether simultaneously or sequentially providing precursors and etchants. However, some of these processes have shown strong exothermic reactions when the precursor gas for semiconductor deposition and the etchant gas intermix. Precursors for CVD of semiconductors may comprise, for example, silicon precursors, germanium precursors and carbon precursors. Silicon precursors may include, for example, pentasilane, tetrasilane, trisilane (Si3H8), dichlorosilane (H2SiCl2, “DCS”), disilane (Si2H6), partially chlorinated disilane, methyl silane, silane (SiH4) or 2,2-dichlorotrisilane. Germanium precursors may include, for example, germane, digermane and trigermane. Carbon precursors may include, for example, silylalkanes such as monosilylmethane, disilylmethane, trisilylmethane and tetrasilylmethane, and/or alkylsilanes such as monomethyl silane (MMS), and dimethyl silane. In some embodiments, a carbon precursor comprises H3Si—CH2—SiH2—CH3 (1,3-disilabutane) or CCl2(SiH3)2 (2,2-dichlorodisylilmethane). Etchants may include, for example, chlorine gas (Cl2).
Taking trisilane and chlorine gas as an example, it is believed that at high enough partial pressures, Cl2 reacts with Si to produce silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4) in an exothermic reaction. The highly exothermic hypergolic reaction of Cl2 with Si3H8 can lead to combustion of the silicon precursor. The reaction can occur upstream of the reaction chamber 300 and therefore lead to premature silicon deposition, which can also lead to subsequent spalling or aerosol particle formation and contamination. In addition, the powerful exothermic reactions can damage the equipment at the point of interaction, such as expensive gas panel units 100. Similar issues can arise with other combinations of semiconductor precursors and etchant gases. Without being limited by theory, it is believed that interaction among the reactant gases in a limited volume and/or passing the reactant gases along common or shared flow paths through flow restrictions prior to entry into the reaction chamber 300 may contribute to these problems. Interaction between highly reactive precursors and etchants under the high pressures caused by these restrictions in a very confined flow path might cause the highly energetic reactions that have been observed. Damage is greater in confined passages, and may exacerbate reactivity by inhibiting heat dissipation, relative to wider, more voluminous spaces. Note that such interaction can occur within these tight confines whether the reactants are supplied simultaneously or sequentially. In sequential supply, residual reactants from a first pulse inevitably remain within the shared flow path when the next pulsed is supplied, which can then react in the shared flow path upstream of the chamber.
Embodiments taught herein avoid undesired effects of highly reactive combinations of a semiconductor precursor and an etchant species in selective formation processes by separately injecting the reactive species into the reaction chamber 300. Particularly volatile combinations of precursor and etchant produce reactions that are at least as exothermic as the reaction of DCS+Cl2. Several highly reactive combinations include without limitation pentasilane+Cl2; tetrasilane+Cl2; trisilane+Cl2; disilane+Cl2; a partially chlorinated disilane+Cl2. The table below compares exothermicity, in terms of approximate enthalpy values, for certain silicon precursors when combined with Cl2.
While much of the description herein focuses on the exemplary combination of trisilane+Cl2, the skilled artisan will readily appreciate from the disclosure herein that the described equipment will also benefit process recipes employing other highly reactive combinations, particularly those more exothermic than DCS+Cl2, at the reaction temperature (e.g., more exothermic than −270 kcal/mol at 0° C. or −250 kcal/mol at 550° C.).
Exemplary processes in which selective formation of semiconductor films is accomplished by supplying deposition precursors and etchants sequentially, rather than simultaneously, are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0287272, published Dec. 13, 2007 (the '272 publication), the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The sequential and preferably cyclical process of the '272 publication provides for blanket deposition over insulating and single-crystal silicon surfaces of a patterned or mixed substrate, followed by selective etching of non-epitaxial material. The blanket deposition is conducted in the absence of etchant, or with low enough levels of etchant as to result in significant net deposition on all surfaces. Epitaxial semiconductor material is left on single crystal semiconductor windows of the patterned substrate, while nonepitaxial material is left on other surfaces, such as metals on insulators. Nonepitaxial (e.g., amorphous or polycrystalline) semiconductor material is more susceptible to etching, and the subsequent etchant pulse is timed to remove all non-epitaxial material from the deposition while leaving at least some of the epitaxial material from the deposition.
Processes and equipment for processing substrates have now been discovered that minimize risk of violent reaction between reactant sources. The described processes and equipment supply the reactants to the reaction chamber using separate gas delivery paths rather than a common flow path upstream of the reaction chamber. Without limiting the invention by theory, it is believed that embodiments of the present invention minimize the risk of premature reactant breakdown, combustion, damage to equipment and substrate contamination by providing adjustable separate flow paths for process gases, thereby avoiding their interaction under high pressure in a limited volume at the gas panel 100 (
Some embodiments of the present invention can be used to separate precursors used in forming transistor structures, such as NMOS structures. For example, the present invention can be used when forming an n-doped silicon layer using trisilane, or a combination of trisilane and monomethyl silane, and an n-dopant such as PH3. Deposition can be followed by a cleaning process, using, for example, HCL and Cl2. Some of these embodiments are discussed further herein.
In the embodiment shown in
Precursors for CVD of semiconductors may comprise, for example, silicon precursors, germanium precursors and carbon precursors. In an embodiment, first reactant source 10 is a silicon precursor. Silicon precursors may include silanes such as, for example, pentasilane, tetrasilane, trisilane (Si3H8), dichlorosilane (H2SiCl2, “DCS”), disilane (Si2H6), partially chlorinated disilane, methylsilane, monosilane (SiH4), or 2,2-dichlorotrisilane. As used herein, the term “silane” encompasses chlorinated silanes, non-chlorinated silanes, and organic silanes. Non-chlorinated silanes include those having a formula SinH2n+2, including monosilane (SiH4), disilane (Si2H6), and trisilane (Si3H8). Some chlorinated silanes are dichlorosilane (“DCS”) and trichlorosilane (“TCS”). An example of an organic silane is trimethylsilane. In other embodiments, first reactant source 10 is a germanium precursor. Germanium precursors may include, for example, germane, digermane and trigermane. In another embodiment, first reactant source 10 is a carbon precursor. Carbon precursors may include, for example, silylalkanes such as monosilylmethane, disilylmethane, trisilylmethane and tetrasilylmethane, and/or alkylsilanes such as monomethyl silane (MMS), and dimethyl silane. In some embodiments, a carbon precursor comprises H3Si—CH2—SiH2—CH3 (1,3-disilabutane) or CCl2(SiH3)2 (2,2-dichlorodisylilmethane).
Embodiments can employ a chlorine-containing species, such as diatomic chlorine gas (Cl2), in the second reactant source 20. Employing diatomic chlorine as an etchant can provide superior etch capability even at low temperatures in the range of 400° C. and 600° C., but can be highly reactive in combination with precursors for semiconductor deposition. In another embodiment, the second reactant source 20 may comprise an etchant comprising hydrogen chloride (HCl). HCl is a very corrosive gas, and it retains moisture. The corrosivity and moisture retention properties inherent to a HCl etchant can be detrimental to other gases and equipment with which it contacts. As such, embodiments of the present invention are useful in isolating the HCl etchant and preventing it from contaminating other gases and other equipment until it mixes in the reaction space, as discussed further below. In one embodiment, the precursor comprises trisilane (Si3H8) and the etchant comprises diatomic chlorine (Cl2). In another embodiment, the precursor comprises a silane, and the etchant comprises HCl. In another embodiment, the precursor comprises monosilane (SiH4) and the etchant comprises hydrogen chloride. The first reactant source 10 can also represent multiple reactant vessels, such as for deposition of SiGe, Si:C or SiGe:C. The second reactant source 20 can contain a halogen-containing etchant to provide selectivity to the deposition process. As noted above, processes taught herein provide particular advantages when the combination of the first reactant source 10 and the second reactant source 20 is a highly reactive combination that produces exothermic reactions.
Note that more than two reactant sources 10, 20 can be used, but only two are shown in
In some embodiments, it is desirable to prevent interaction of the vapor phase gases from the first reactant source 10 and the second reactant source 20 in the gas panel 100. Referring still to
In the illustrated embodiment, as best shown in
It may be desirable to control or adjust the gas flow from first reactant source 10 into reaction space 340, and to control or adjust a flow profile of gas from first reactant source 10 across the width of reaction space 340, to provide improved uniformity in thickness and chemical composition for the deposited film on substrate 80. The gas flow from first reactant source 10 can be controlled in many different ways, such as with an MFC positioned on the gas panel 100 as discussed above. In an embodiment shown in
The flow profile of gas from first reactant source 10 across the width of reaction space 340 can be controlled with a first set of adjustable gas injectors 212a extending across the width of housing 500 and corresponding to a first set of entrance paths 213a, horizontal channels 214a, and slits 216a, spanning some, most, or all of the width of reaction space 340. In an embodiment of the substrate processing system shown in
In operation, the first gas from the first reactant source 10 is conveyed into injector housing 500 through first supply line 60, and enters first gas delivery path 510a via first channel 211a. The first gas is conveyed from first channel 211a through the first set of adjustable gas injectors 212a. Each adjustable gas injector 212 in the first set of adjustable gas injectors 212a is adjusted relative to each other to control the flow of gas from the first channel 211a into each associated entrance path 213a. Next, the first gas is conveyed from each first entrance path 213a into each first horizontal channel 214a. From each first horizontal channel 214a, the first gas flows into the reaction space 340 via each first slit 216a. The first slit 216a can have a smaller cross-sectional area, transverse to the gas flow path, than the channel 214a and can therefore be a bottleneck or flow constriction on gases from the first reactant source 10, aiding in distributing the gases across the portion of the width of the reaction space 340 that the slit 216a traverses. In this way, the first set of adjustable gas injectors 212a injects the first gas into the reaction space 340.
In operation, the second gas is conveyed from the second reactant source 20 through the second gas delivery path 510b and into reaction space 340 similarly to the manner discussed above for first gas delivery path 510a, with first supply line 60, first channel 211a, first entrance paths 213a, first horizontal channels 214a and first slits 216a functioning similarly to second supply line 70, second channel 211b, second entrance paths 213b, second horizontal channels 214b and second slits 216b, respectively. A second set of adjustable gas injectors 212b injects the second gas into the reaction space 340 and controls the gas flow and flow profile of the second gas from second reactant source 20 into the reaction space 340 similarly to the first set of gas injectors 212a for the first gas. The second set of adjustable gas injectors 212b can be configured to be at least partially contained by the housing 500, similar to the first set of gas injectors 212a. The alternative features and functions discussed above for the first gas delivery path 510a and its components can be similarly employed with second gas delivery path 510b and its components.
In the embodiment shown in
Slits 216a, 216b can be configured in many different ways. Referring again to an embodiment illustrated in
With reference to
In an embodiment shown in
From the mixing space 342, the gas curtain 371 changes direction, flowing horizontally towards substrate 80. As such, the first and second gases preferably follow a shared or common flow path from mixing space 342, through channel 341, through and away from opening 343f, and over a substrate support 350, which is sized and shaped to support the substrate 80 (
Referring again to
As illustrated in
In some modes of operation, gas from the first reactant source 10 and gas from the second reactant source 20 are introduced sequentially into the reaction space 340 such that the reactants from the reactant sources 10, 20 are not intended to mix during processing. The illustrated separate flow paths still reduce the risk of explosive interaction between reactants for such sequential modes of operation. Because the illustrated injector housing 500 keeps the flow paths for the gases separate until they intersect at the mixing space 342, there is no danger that residual reactant from one pulse will interact with a subsequent pulse of the other reactant within the confines of the gas panel 100 (
In other modes of operation, the gases are introduced simultaneously into the reaction space 340 and actually mix and interact during selective deposition. As the precursors and etchants mix within the reaction space, under lower pressures and in a larger volume than the upstream gas panel 100 (
In some processes, temperature in the reaction space 340 is below about 750° C., and particularly between about 500° C. and about 600° C. Thus, temperature control of manifold 200 may be desirable. Referring again to
Referring to
The skilled artisan will appreciate that some of the advantages of the equipment and processes taught herein will be obtained with other geometric configurations, and that various alterations of these geometric configurations might present different advantages. For example,
As shown in
The foregoing embodiments provide methods and equipment for separately providing precursors for semiconductor deposition and etchants that provide selectivity. The first intersection, or mixing space, for these two reactants is within the relatively spacious reaction space, rather than upstream manifolds and gas panels. By avoiding interaction within the tight confines of portion flow paths upstream of the reaction space, potentially harmful reactions are avoided or such reactions take place within the reaction space where reactions are not confined to a small volume, pressures can be kept lower, and less damage is incurred. Advantages are obtained whether the precursors and etchants for selective film formation are supplied simultaneously or in sequential steps.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications thereof. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2761853 | Uraneck et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2860173 | Jones et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
3377395 | Christoph, Jr. | Apr 1968 | A |
4058430 | Suntola et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4161462 | Bocharov et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4369031 | Goldman et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4413022 | Suntola et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4612077 | Tracy et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4656021 | Tanabe et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4747367 | Posa | May 1988 | A |
4761269 | Conger et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4793283 | Sarkozy | Dec 1988 | A |
4854263 | Chang et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4902572 | Horne et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4980204 | Fujii et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5024182 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5071670 | Kelly | Dec 1991 | A |
5112439 | Reisman et al. | May 1992 | A |
5194398 | Miyachi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5221556 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5250323 | Miyazaki | Oct 1993 | A |
5269847 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5304247 | Kondo et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306666 | Izumi | Apr 1994 | A |
5411590 | Hawkins et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413671 | Ketchum | May 1995 | A |
5421288 | Ohta et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5453124 | Moslehi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455070 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5487358 | Ohta et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5525157 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5551982 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5674781 | Huang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5698070 | Hirano et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702530 | Shan et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5711811 | Suntola et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5769950 | Takasu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5831335 | Miyamoto | Nov 1998 | A |
5849092 | Xi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851589 | Nakayama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5879459 | Gadgil et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888907 | Tomoyasu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904565 | Nguyen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916365 | Sherman | Jun 1999 | A |
5933761 | Lee | Aug 1999 | A |
5948168 | Shan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948958 | Bang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976261 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003535 | Ollivier | Dec 1999 | A |
6013155 | McMillin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015590 | Suntola et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022412 | Vincenzo et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037258 | Liu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042654 | Comita et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048790 | Iacoponi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069068 | Rathore et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077775 | Stumborg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083818 | Stumborg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093252 | Wengert et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093368 | Rafferty et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100184 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6139700 | Kang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143080 | Bartholomew et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146517 | Hoinkis | Nov 2000 | A |
6148761 | Majewski et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162323 | Koshimizu | Dec 2000 | A |
6181012 | Edelstein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184128 | Wang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185839 | Kholodenko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188134 | Stumborg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203613 | Gates et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207487 | Kim et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207567 | Wang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217659 | Botelho et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225213 | Urabe | May 2001 | B1 |
6270572 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287965 | Kang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291876 | Stumborg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303523 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6328221 | Moore et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333272 | McMillin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340619 | Ko | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342448 | Lin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
RE37546 | Mahawili | Feb 2002 | E |
6347749 | Moore et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351039 | Jin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352594 | Cook et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6358829 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6368954 | Lopatin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380065 | Komai et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383954 | Wang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391785 | Satta et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399491 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6444495 | Leung et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482733 | Raaijmakers et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6511539 | Raaijmakers | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521048 | Miller et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531347 | Huster et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555839 | Fitzgerald | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562140 | Bondestam et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572924 | Halpin | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583015 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583048 | Vincent et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593191 | Fitzgerald | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6716713 | Todd | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727169 | Raaijmakers et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6820570 | Kilpela et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821825 | Todd et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6900115 | Todd | May 2005 | B2 |
6927140 | Soman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958253 | Todd | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962859 | Todd et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969875 | Fitzgerald | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7020981 | Shero et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026219 | Pomarede et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7071127 | Dong et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091522 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7132338 | Samoilov et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7166528 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186630 | Todd | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195985 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208362 | Chidambaram | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235492 | Samoilov | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7237460 | Hu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273526 | Shinriki et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7307273 | Currie | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312128 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335545 | Currie | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7655543 | Bauer | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7682947 | Brabant et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7732305 | Ye et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740704 | Strang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806078 | Yoshida | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7897491 | Bauer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7939447 | Bauer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7960256 | Ye et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8067061 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8088223 | Todd et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010001742 | Huang et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010009138 | Botelho et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010013363 | Kitayama et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034123 | Jeon et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020023520 | Hu | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042205 | McMillin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020168868 | Todd | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033979 | Kholodenko et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030075273 | Kilpela et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040035358 | Basceri et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041216 | Mori | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043636 | Vaartstra et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048439 | Soman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040107897 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040142558 | Granneman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040216665 | Soininen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216668 | Lindfors et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040219735 | Brabant et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224089 | Singh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235295 | Dong et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262694 | Chidambaram | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023520 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061243 | Sarigiannis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079691 | Kim et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079692 | Samoilov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092247 | Schmidt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050150454 | Li et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050250298 | Bauer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011984 | Currie | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014366 | Currie | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060115933 | Ye et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115934 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148151 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166414 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169668 | Samoilov | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060169669 | Zojaji et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205194 | Bauer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216417 | Todd et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234504 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240630 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266289 | Verghese et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275546 | Arena et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289900 | Thirupapuliyur et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015374 | Granneman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070101939 | Sumakeris et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070259112 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287272 | Bauer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026149 | Tomasini et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080202416 | Provencher et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090111246 | Bauer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090163001 | Bauer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090260572 | Kim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100255658 | Aggarwal et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110230036 | Ye et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19820147 | Jul 1999 | DE |
10026180 | Dec 2001 | DE |
1024210 | Aug 2000 | EP |
03131594 | Jun 1991 | JP |
04-252023 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04-085818 | Sep 1992 | JP |
06151338 | May 1994 | JP |
08-139017 | May 1996 | JP |
2006253696 | Sep 2006 | JP |
200305202 | Oct 2003 | TW |
WO 8912703 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO 9617107 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9941423 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9962109 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0011721 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0013207 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0015866 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0015881 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0016377 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0022659 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0055895 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0075964 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0079576 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0115220 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0136702 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0145149 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0166832 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0178123 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178124 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0199166 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 2004025716 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abeles et al.; Amorphous Semiconductor Superlattices; Physical Review Letters; Nov. 21, 1983; pp. 2003-2006; vol. 51; No. 21. |
Antonell et al., “Carbon incorporation for strain compensation during solid phase epitaxial recrystallization of SiGe on Si at 500-600°C”, J. Appl. Phys. 79 (10), pp. 7646-7651 (1996). |
Aoyama, T., “Si Selective Epitaxial Growth Using Cl2 Pulsed Molecular Flow Method,” Thin Solid Films 321 (1998) 256-260, © 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. |
Bauer et al., “Si3H8 based epitaxy of biaxially stressed silicon films doped with carbon and arsenic for CMOS applications”, in Semiconductor Defect Engineering—Materials, Synthetic Structures and Devices, edited by S. Ashok, J. Chevallier, B.L. Sopori, M. Tabe, and P. Kiesel (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 864, Warrendale, PA, 2005), E4.30. |
Bauer et al., “Time resolved reflectivity measurements of silicon solid phase epitaxial regrowth”, Thin Solid Films 364, pp. 228-232 (2000). |
Bedair; Selective area and sidewall growth by atomic layer epitaxy; Semicond Sci. Technol; 1993; 1052-1062; vol. 8. |
Düscö et al.; Deposition of Tin Oxide into Porous Silicon by Atomic Layer Epitaxy; J. Electrochem. Soc.; Feb. 1996; pp. 683-687; vol. 143, No. 2. |
Eberl et al., “Structural properties of SiC and SiGeC alloy layers on Si”, Chapter 2.5 in “Properties of Silicon Germanium and SiGe:Carbon”, Institution of Electrical Engineers, pp. 75-77 (1999). |
Fazan et al.; A High-C Capacitor (20.4 Ff/μm2) with Ultrathin CVD—Ta2O5 Films Deposited on Rugged Poly-Si for High Density DRAMs; IEEE; 1992; pp. IDEM 92-263-IDEM 92-266. |
Feng et al., “Raman determination of layer stresses and strains for heterostructures and its application to the cubic SiC/Si system”, J. Appl. Phys. 64 (12), pp. 6827-6835 (1988). |
George et al.; Nucleation and Growth During Tungsten Atomic Layer Deposition on Oxide Surfaces; Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. vol. 672; Materials Research Society 2001; 07.7.1-07.7.7. |
Haukka et al.; Chemisorption of chromium acetylacetonate on porous high surface area silica; Applied Surface Science; 1994; pp. 220-227. |
Hiltunen et al.; Nitrides of Titanium, Niobium, Tantalum and Molybdenum Grown as Thin Films by the Atomic Layer Epitaxy Method; Thin Solid Films; 1988; pp. 149-154; vol. 166. |
Horiike et al.; Filling of Si Oxide into a Deep Trench using Digital CVD Method; Applied Surface Science; 1990; pp. 168-174; vol. 46. |
Hoyt, “Substitutional carbon incorporation and electronic characterization of Si1-yCy/Si and Si1-x-yGexCy/Si heterojunctions”, Chapter 3 in “Silicon-Germanium Carbon Alloy”, Taylor and Francis (New York, NY), pp. 59-89 (2002). |
Jin et al.; Porous Silica Xerogel Processing and Integration for ULSI Applications; Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings; 1998; pp. 213-222; vol. 511. |
Jorke, “Segregation of Ge and dopant atoms during growth of SiGe layers”, Chapter 6.3 in “Properties of Silicon Germanium and SiGe:Carbon”, Institution of Electrical Engineers, pp. 287-301 (1999). |
Juppo et al.; Deposition of copper films by an alternate supply of CuCl and Zn; J. Vac. Sci. Technol.; 1997; pp. 2003; vol.-issue A 15(4). |
Kaizuka et al.; Conformal Chemical Vapor Deposition TiN(111) Film Formation as an Underlayer of Al for Highly Reliable Interconnects; Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.; 1994; pp. 470-474; vol. 33. |
Kikkawa et al.; A Quarter-Micrometer Interconnection Technology Using a TiN/Al-Si-Cu/TiN/Al-Si-Cu/TiN/Ti Multilayer Structure; IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices; Feb. 1993; pp. 296-302; vol. 40, No. 2. |
Kikkawa et al.; Al-Si-Cu/TiN multilayer interconnection and Al-Ge reflow sputtering technologies for quarter-micron devices; SPIE; 1992; pp. 54-64; vol. 1805. |
Kim et al.; Applicability of ALE Tin films as Cu/Si diffusion barriers; Thin Solid Films; 2000; pp. 276-283; 372(1). |
Kim et al.; Comparison of TiN and TiAIN as a Diffusion Barrier Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition; Journal of the Korean Physical Society; 2002; pp. 176-179; 40(1). |
Klaus et al.; Atomic Layer Deposition of SiO2 Using Catalyzed and Uncatalyzed Self-Limiting Surface Reactions; Surface Review and Letters; 1999; pp. 435-448; vol. 6, Nos. 3 & 4. |
Klaus et al.; Atomic Layer Deposition of Tungsten Nitride Films Using Sequential Surface Reactions; J. Electrochem Soc.; 2000; 1175-1181; 147(3). |
Klaus et al.; Atomically controlled growth of tungsten and tungsten nitride using sequential surface reactions; Applied Surface Science; 2000; pp. 479-491; Vols. 162-163. |
Koo et al.; Study on the characteristics of Ti AIN thin film deposited by atomic layer deposition method; Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology, A: Vacuum Surfaces, and Films; 2001; 2931-2834; 19(6). |
Kouvetakis et al., “Synthesis and analysis of compounds and alloys in the GeC, SiC, and SiGeC systems”, Chapter 2 in Series—Optoelectronic properties of semiconductors and superlattices; v. 15 Silicon-germanium carbon alloy / edited by S.T. Pantelides and S. Zollner; pp. 19-58. |
Kukli et al.; Atomic Layer Epitaxy Growth of Tantalum Oxide Thin Films from Ta(OC2H5)5 and H2O; J. Electrochem. Soc.; May 1995; pp. 1670-1674; vol. 142, No. 5. |
Leskelä et al.; Atomic Layer Epitaxy in Deposition of Various Oxide and Nitride Thin Films; Journal De Physique IV, Colloque C5, supplement au Journal de Physique II; Jun. 1995; pp. C5-937-C5-951; vol. 5. |
MacKnight et al., “RTP applications and technology options for the sub-45 nm node”, Proceedings, RTP2004 Conference (Portland, OR) (2004). |
Martensson et al.; Atomic layer epitaxy of copper an ab inition investigation of the CuCl/H2 process Ill. Reaction barriers; Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2000; 92-100; 157(1). |
Martensson et al.; Atomic Layer Epitaxy of Copper on Tantalum; Chemical Vapor Deposition; 1997; pp. 45-50; vol. 3, No. 1. |
Martensson et al.; Atomic Layer Epitaxy of Copper, Growth and Selectivity in the Cu(ll)-2,2,6, 6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionate/H2 Process; J. Electrochem. Soc.; Aug. 1998; pp. 2926-2931; vol. 145, No. 8. |
Martensson et al.; CU(THD)2 as Copper Source in Atomic Layer Epitaxy; Proc. Electrochem. Soc.; 1997; 1529-1536; 97-25. |
Martensson et al.; Use of Atomic Layer Epitaxy for Fabrication of Si/TiN/Cu Structures; J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Sep./Oct. 1999; pp. 2122-2128; vol. 17, No. 5. |
Meléndez-Lira et al., “Substitutional carbon in Si1-yCy alloys as measured with infrared absorption and Raman spectroscopy”, J. Appl. Phys. 82, pp. 4246-4252 (1997). |
Min et al.; Atomic Layer Deposition of TiN Films by Alternate Supply of Tetrakis (ethylmethylarnino)—Titanium and Ammonia; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics; 1998; pp. 4999-5004; vol. 37. |
Min et al.; Chemical Vapor Deposition of Ti-Si-N Films with Alternating Source Supply; Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.; 1999; pp. 207-210; vol. 564; Materials Research Society. |
Min et al.; Metal-Organic Atomic-Layer Deposition of Titanium-Silicon-Nitride Films; Applied Physics Letters; 1999; pp. 1521-1523; vol. 75, No. 11. |
Min; Atomic Layer Deposition of TiN Thin Films by Sequential Introduction of Ti Precursor and NH3; Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings; 1998; pp. 337-343; vol. 514. |
Moller; Copper and Nickel Ultrathin Films on Metal-Oxide Crystal Surfaces Mater. Soc. Monogr.; 1994; 473-522; 81. |
Niinistö et al.; Synthesis of oxide thin films and overlayers by atomic layer epitaxy for advanced applications; Materials Science and Engineering; 1996; pp. 23-29; vol. B41. |
Oehme et al., “A novel measurement method of segregating adlayers in MBE”, Thin Solid Films 369, pp. 138-142 (2000). |
Oehme et al., “Carbon segregation in silicon”, Thin Solid Films 380, pp. 75-77 (2000). |
O'Neil et al., “Optimization of process conditions for selective silicon epitaxy using disilane, hydrogen, and chlorine”, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (9), pp. 3309-3315 (1997). |
Osten et al., “Substitutional carbon incorporation in epitaxial Si1-yCy alloys on Si(001) grown by molecular beam epitaxy”, Applied Physics Letters 74 (6), pp. 836-838 (1999). |
Osten et al., “Substitutional versus interstitial carbon incorporation during psuedomorphic growth of Si1-yCy on Si(001)”, J. Appl. Phys. 80 (12), pp. 6711-6715 (1996). |
Ott et al.; Modification of Porous Alumina membranes Using Al2O3 Atomic Layer Controlled Deposition; Chem. Mater.; 1997; pp. 707-714; vol. 9. |
PCT Search Report, PCT Application PCT/US2006/003333; Jun. 30, 2006. |
PCT Search Report, PCT Application PCT/US2006/003465; Jul. 7, 2006. |
Ritala et al.; Atomic Layer Epitaxy Growth of TiN Thin Films from Tila and NH3; J. Electrochem. Soc.; Aug. 1998; pp. 2914-2920; vol. 145; No. 8. |
Ritala et al.; Controlled Growth of TaN, Ta3N5, and TaOxNy Thin Filims by Atomic Layer Deposition; Chem. Mater.; 1999; pp. 1712-1718; vol. 11. |
Ritala et al.; Effects of intermediate zinc pulses on properties of TiN and NbN films deposited by atomic layer epitaxy; Appl. Surf. Sci.; 1997; 199-212; 120. |
Ritala et al.; Perfectly Conformal TiN and Al2O3 Films Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition; Chem Vap. Deposition; 1999; pp. 7-9; vol. 5, No. 1. |
Rossnagel et al.; Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of Ta and Ti for interconnect diffusin barriers; J. Vac. Sci. Technol.; 2000; 2016-2020; 18(4). |
Ryan et al.; Material Property Characterization and Integration Issues for Mesoporous Silica; IEEE, 1999, pp. IITC 99-187-IITC 99-189. |
Sakaue et al.; Digital Chemical Vapor Deposition of SiO2 Using a Repetitive Reaction of Triethylsilane/Hydrogen and Oxidation; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics; Jan. 1990; pp. L124-L127; vol. 30, No. 1B. |
Singer; Atomic Layer Deposition Targets Thin Films; Semiconductor International; Sep. 1999; pp. 40. |
Sneh et al.; Atomic layer growth of SiO2 on Si(100) using SiCl4 and H2O in a binary reaction sequence; Surface Science; 1995; pp. 135-152; vol. 334. |
Solanki et al.; Atomic Layer Deposition of Copper Seed Layers; Electrochem. and Solid State Lett.; 2000; 479-480; 3(10). |
Strane et al., “Carbon incorporation into Si at high concentrations by ion implantation and solid phase epitaxy”, J. Appl. Phys. 79 (2), pp. 637-646 (1996). |
Strane et al., “Precipitation and relaxation in strained Si1-yCy/Si heterostructures”, J. Appl. Phys. 76 (6), pp. 3656-3668 (1994). |
Tiitta et al.; Preparation and Characterization of Phosphorus-Doped Aluminum Oxide Thin Films; Materials Research Bulletin; 1998; pp. 1315-1323; vol. 33, No. 9. |
U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service; Ceramic Coatings on Metals Using Atomic Layer Controlled Chemical Vapor Deposition (Assert-96); Feb. 16, 2000; Colorado University at Boulder. |
Utriainen et al.; Studies of metallic thin film growth in an atomic layer epitaxy reactor using M(ACAC)2 (M=Ni,Cu,Pt) precursors; Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2000; 151-158; 157(3). |
Van Zant, “Microchip Fabrication”, 4th Ed., McGraw Hill (New York, NY), pp. 364-365 (2000). |
Violette et al., “On the role of chlorine in selective silicon epitaxy by chemical vapor deposition”, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (10), pp. 3290-3296 (1996). |
Wang; Spin on Dielectric Films—A General Overview; 1998 5th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology Proceedings; Oct. 21-23, 1998; p. 961; Beijing, China. |
Windl et al., “Theory of strain and electronic structure of Si1-yCy and Si1-x-yGexCy alloys”, Phys. Rev. B57 (4), pp. 2431-2442 (1998). |
Wise et al.; Diethyldiethoxysilane as a New Precursor for SiO2 Growth on Silicon; Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.; 1994; pp. 37-43; vol. 334. |
Wolf et al.; Process and Equipment Simulation of Copper Chemical Vapor Deposition Using Cu(hfac)vtms; Microelectronic Engineering; 1999; 15-27; 45. |
Yagi et al.; Substitutional C incorporation into Si1—yCy alloys using novel carbon source, 1,3-disilabutane; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics; 2004; pp. 4153-4154; vol. 43, No. 7A. |
Singapore Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2011 for Singapore Application No. 201004102-8. |
Agrawal, et al., “Cl Insertion on Si(100)-(2x1): Etching Under Conditions of Supersaturation”, Physical Review Letters (2007) 98, 136104-1-136104-4. |
Aketagawa, et al., The influence of Cl2 on Si1-xGex selective epitaxial growth and B-doping properties by UHV-CVD'< Journal of Crystal Growth 127 (1993) 484-488. |
Aketagawa, et al., “Limitations of selective epitaxial growth conditions in gas-source MBE using Si2H6”, Journal of Crystal Growth 111(1991) 860-863. |
Aldao, et al., “Halogen etching of Si via atomic-scale processes”, Progress in Surface Science (2001) 68; 189-230. |
Aldao, et al., Atomic processes during Cl supersaturation etching of Si(100)-(2x1), Physical Review B (2009) 79: 125303-1-125303-5. |
Aoyama, et al., “Si selective epitaxial growth using Cl2 pulsed molecular flow method”, Thin Solid Firms 321 (1998) 256-260. |
Bauer, et al., “Low temperature Si:C co-flow and hybrid process using Si3H8/Cl2”, Thin Solid Films 520 (2012) 3133-3138. |
Bauer, et al., “Low temperature selective eoitaxial growth of SiCP on Si (110) oriented surfaces”, Thin Solid Films 520 (2012) 3144-3148. |
Bauer, et al., “Low temperature catalyst enhanced etch process with high etch rate selectivity for amorphous silicon based alloys over single-crystalline silicon based alloys”, Thin Solid Films 520 (2012) 3139-3143. |
Gao, et al., “Comparison of Cl2 and HCl adsorption on Si(100)-(2x1)”, Thin Solid Films (1993) 225: 140-144. |
Gao, et al., “Influence of phosphine flow rate on Si growth rate in gas source molecular beam epitaxy”, Journal of Crystal Growth 220 (200) 461-465. |
Maruno, et al., “Selective Epitaxial Growth by Ultrahigh-Vacuum Chemical Vapor Deposition with Alternating Gas Supply of Si2H6 and Cl2”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39 (200)) 6139-6142. |
Ogryzlo, et al., “The etching of doped polycrystalline silicon by molecular chlorine”, J. Appl. Phys. (1988) 64(11) 6510-6514. |
Ogryzlo, et al., “Doping and crystallographic effects in Cl-atom etching of silicon”, J. Appl. Phys. (1990) 67(6) 3115-3120. |
Tatsumi, et al., “Selective epitaxial growth by UHV-CVD using Si2H6 and Cl2”, Journal of Crystal Growth 120 (1992) 275-278. |
Violette, et al., “Low temperature selective silicon epitaxy by ultra high vacuum rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition using Si2H6, H2 and Cl2”, Appl. Phys. Lett. (1996) 68(1) 66-68. |
The pending file history for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,865, filed May 31, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100255658 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |