The present invention relates to system and method for calibrating color printers, and related particularly to, a system and method for calibrating color printers over a network utilizing a profile server (representing a networkable computer server system) which provides color transformations in accordance with printer configurations having at least information read from consumable ink or toner cartridges for such printers. Such color transformations enable different color printers, or even the same color printer with different printer configurations, to render color consistently. This is especially useful for high end printers used by publishers and printing houses for proofing or printing color in newspapers, periodicals, catalogs, marketing collateral, and the like. The present invention further relates to a cartridge having identifying information for the toner or ink in such cartridge used in providing transformations for calibration the color rendered by printers.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,157,735, and 6,043,909 describe systems and methods for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,425 describes a related system for automatic color calibration. In these patents, information is communicated for color matching at and among nodes of a network. A computer system called a profile server, is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,425 for assisting a node in determining color calibration for color rendering device in response to color calibration data measured by a color calibration instrument at the rendering device. These patents also describe the import/export of generic and/or standardized color transformations. These transformations may be used in combination with linearization functions customized to a particular, nodal rendering device that are updated regularly. Where color matching among devices in a network is desired, these patents also describe the sharing of information, such as gamut data, to enable matching. In the case of video displays, U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,425 describes the use of multidimensional transformations that are based on measurements made at the time of manufacture of the display and provided in ROM, on diskette or over the Internet. After manufacture, simpler linearization and white balance calibration may be used to maintain the device in a known, baseline state. It would also be useful for hard copy rendering devices, such as color printers, to provide information about their configuration that would allow a user of color printer to obtain calibration data that could be used to prepared a color transformation adequate to handle at least the color-mixing part of device modeling.
It is the principal object of the present invention to provide a system and method for calibrating color printers based on printer configuration information including at least information read from a toner or ink cartridge at the color printer.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a system and method for calibration of a color printer in which a profile server operates responsive to received printer configuration information and/or color calibration data measured at the rendering device to provide color transformation and/or linearization curves for use by the printer.
It is another object of the present invention to provide toner or ink cartridges having stored information readable by one of the printer or user for use in calibrating color printers that use such cartridges.
Briefly described, the system has a network having multiple nodes in which one node has a profile server representing a computer system having a memory storage unit for a database, and one or more other of the nodes have a nodal computer system or device coupled to at least one color printer in which the nodes communicate between others of the nodes over the network. The database stores color profile data for controlling color reproduction by the different printers for different printer configurations. The profile server, via the network, receives data from the nodal computer system representing the printer configuration having at least the identifying information stored in a replaceable cartridge installable in the rendering device. In response to such received data, the profile server determines a color transformation (and/or linearization curves) useable by the printer, and sends such color transformation to the nodal computer system (or to the printer if no computer system is present at the node) for use when rendering color by the color printer.
The profile server responds to received printer configuration information and sends the color transformation to the requested node if stored in the database for the particular printer configuration, otherwise the color transformation is calculated as described in incorporated U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425, 6,157,735, and 6,043,909.
The printer configuration data sent by a node to the profile server may further include user preferences for rendering on the rendering device to be included in the color transformation determined by the profile server.
Once received by the nodal computer system, linearization, gamuts, or other color rendering issues may be handled further at the node, as desired by the user, in which the color transformation received provides a base line in common color rendering by different color cartridges in the same rendering device upon which the user may then adjust as desired. Thus, different color rendering devices may render color in substantially the same manner as attainable by the devices by the use of color transformation received from the profile server in accordance with data read from a cartridge.
Typical hardcopy rendering devices are microprocessor-based systems for controlling their print rendering from toner or ink from installed cartridge(s). In the rendering device, a reader coupled to the microprocessor may be provided which is aligned (or in proximity to) the installed cartridge to read data defining the state of calibration of the cartridge and provide such read to data to the nodal computer system. Devices on or in a ink or toner cartridge for storing such data, such as an identifier (or code), may be passive or active Radio Frequency (RF) Identification Devices, barcodes, or non-volatile memory provided by wire or wirelessly. Alternatively, a software application may be provided which enables the user to input an identifier(s) from the cartridge or its packaging to a software application operating at a nodal computer system as input data, via keyboard and/or mouse, which may be transmitted to the profile server.
Data read by an input device or the user for a set of cartridges is sent to the profile server where the database is maintained and multidimensional transformations are prepared and stored. These transformations optimize performance at the level of the nodal system to printer interactions, where nodal system includes the nodal computer and its software applications, virtual proofing, and the like.
The foregoing objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from a reading of the following description in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
Node A 10 includes components similar to nodes described in
A hardcopy rendering device, printer 17, is shown at node 10. A color measurement instrument (CMI) 18 is provided as a module for calibration of the printer. CMI 18 includes a sensor, lamp, reference and control unit (which may itself be of modular design) and a transport mechanism 20 for transporting hard copy of a calibration or verification sheet rendered by printer 17 so that the sheet may be read by the CMI with a minimum of user effort or involvement. Reflection or transmission measurements are facilitated by the transport mechanism 20 for such a sheet, bearing a matrix or array of color samples, which is actuated by click of computer mouse or, preferably, by insertion of the sheet in the transport mechanism. The transport mechanism may be integrated with the printer 17 in which the optical pickup component of the sensor is mounted to move in tandem with the marking head of the device and transport of the copy may be performed by the mechanism of the printer, such as when the printer is an ink jet printer. In either case, the optical pickup links the devices to a control unit for the CMI by fiber optic or by electrical wire link.
The profile server 16 at Node N 12 may consist of a multiprocessor or locally networked array of processors or high performance workstation processor whose performance may be enhanced by special-purpose hardware. The exact architecture (such as RISC or CISC, MIMD or SIMD) is not critical, but needs to provide the capacity to compute quickly color transformation mappings, gamut operations, etc., as described in incorporated U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425, 6,157,735, and 6,043,909. Any of the processors in the network may have this capability or none may. However, the more responsive the network is in development and modification of Virtual Proof constituents, the more useful it can be. Disk storage or memory 21, such as are hard disk drive or other high volume storage unit represents centralized storage of current and historical constituents, which may be shared by one or more nodes on the network. The profile server further provides a database which stores calibration data for rendering devices of the network, such as color profiles (inter-device color translation files), or data needed to generate such profiles. The calibration data produced for each rendering device in the network is also described in the incorporated U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425, 6,157,735, and 6,043,909.
Referring to
The transport mechanism represents motors, associated rollers and gears of a typical printer which drive the media and/or print engine (print head) with respect to media being printed upon. Media may be paper for example. A controller 26 controls the operation of the printer. The controller 26 may be an integrated circuit, such as a microprocessor or microcontroller, operating in accordance with software or program instructions stored in memory 26a. The controller interfaces the printer with its coupled computer system 14 via an I/O interface 25. Controller 26 operates the print engine and transport mechanism 22 in response to data (such as image data) received via an I/O interface 25 from a computer system 14.
The printer has a color measuring instrument (CMI) 18 shown also as being part of the printer and integrated with the printer's transport system as described earlier. CMI 18 may be a calorimeter or a density sensor. Printer 17 may instead not have an integrated CMI, in which the CMI and its transport system 20 (
The particular nature of the reader device 28 of identifying information 24a depends on how the identifying information 24a is stored in the cartridges 24. For example, the identifying information 24a for each cartridge 24 when encoded as a barcode is printed on a barcode label adhesively attached or printed upon the outside of the cartridge as a certain known location on each cartridge. The reader 28 has a detector for reading the bar code from each cartridge 24. The detector of reader 28 may be a CCD or photodiode with optics. Reader 28 may be moved in alignment with respect to the cartridges to read their barcode identifiers in which one, or both, the cartridges and reader are on a translational stage. Reader 28 may have an illumination source to provide light which is then reflected from the bars and spaces of the barcode and returned to the detector for decoding. The controller 26 of the printer or the host computer 14 has software for decoding electrical signals representing the read barcode data into its corresponding decoded data. Alternatively, the printer 17 has no reader 28, and the computer system 14 has a barcode scanner which a user reads the barcode identifiers of the cartridges prior to, or after (if accessible), installation in the printer.
In another example, the identifying information 24a for each cartridge may be an RFID device or tag storing the identifying information, and reader 28 is an RFID reader which can automatically read the different RFIDs of the cartridges in proximity to the reader. A static RFID reader may be used, or the RFID reader and/or the cartridges are on a translational stage in the printer. The RFID tag and reading may be passive or active. Other means for storing identifying information on each cartridge and reading means may be used as earlier described such as a ROM or other or non-volatile memory chip which is read by controller 26 by wire (or contacts on the cartridge) when they mate with contacts in the printer, or such ROM may be wirelessly read by a RF reader 28, or switch array identification or capacitive sensor identification may be used. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,644,771, 5,835,817, 6,549,732, 6,351,621 or 6,654,567, or Published Application No. 2003/0112419, describing various means for providing data readable from a cartridge. Other data storage means and corresponding reader may also be provided, such as by switch array identification or capacitive sensor identification, as described in U.S. Published Applications 2003/00681885 or 2002/0080335 respectively. Alternatively, a software application on computer system 14 may be provided which enables the user manually to input an identifier(s) from the cartridge or its packaging to computer system, via keyboard and/or mouse.
Node N 12 of
The controller 26 interfaces the printer to host computer 14, which may be a general purpose computer, PC or laptop, capable of executing imaging, retouching and printer applications, or the like. Computer system 14 typically has a video display 11 providing a user interface to various software applications along with keyboard, mouse, and local storage, such as a hard and/or optical disk drives. The computer system 14, links to profile server 16 such as via network interface 30, such as a modem, network interface card (“NIC”) cable interface, DSL, TI, or the like, or if it is on a LAN, it may connect through a server (not shown) that administers the LAN to the network 11a for connecting to the profile server 16. For example, at node 12 of the present invention profile server 16 may be an addressable web site on the Internet.
A scanner, imagical or SOM, as described in the incorporated patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425, 6,157,735, and 6,043,909, may optionally be interfaced with the computer system 14. Such color measurement capability is indicated by CMI 29.
Information about printer configuration is stored in files or records on database 21. Each file includes a printer model number, cartridge lot numbers, and paper type, and for such printer model number, cartridge lot numbers, and paper type, is stored with transformation information similar to a Virtual Proof data structure. This enables the profile server to locate a generic transformation information by looking up in database a record matching a particular printer's model number, cartridge lot numbers, and paper type. In addition, other characteristics may be included in fields of the file by which to look up transformation information, including aim linearization curves, intended viewing illuminant, and gamut scaling objectives that are critical to a simulation of another printer, black utilization objectives, and other information.
Optionally, the database 21 may also maintain a registry enabling participating manufacturers privileged access to the database over network 11a for the purpose of adding information about printer configurations, or retrieving use-of-service or other status information. The use-of-service information may be obtained by linking to a transaction registry which logs accesses, modifications, or additions to printer configurations that results from interaction with peripheral users.
Referring to
1) On one branch, it uses the information to adjust intrinsic parameters that affect the interaction between the cartridges and other components of the printer's image forming chain, to the extent that the information is available locally at the printer (step 36). Often printers have internal sensors for various conditions and these may be exercised as part of an iterative loop in which a parameter is adjusted to within a tolerance (step 38). Failure following an allowed number of iterations causes an exception (error) to be raised.
2) On the other branch, an attempt is initiated to send to the profile server 16 the read identifying information (step 40). In the case in which the identifier on the cartridge 24 is a barcode with only limited information, such as a manufacturer's ID and lot number, the information needed to optimize intrinsic print parameters may not be available locally at the printer and is sought from the database of profile server 16. This information includes color transformations that may have been prepared by the manufacturer for a specific printer configuration that could not be stored with a particular consumables cartridge.
To provide such color transformation for specific printer configuration at the factory, a model of printer is operated to make test prints with different combinations of color cartridges from different lots and for different types of paper, and any other criteria as may be used to look up transformation information in database 21, such as viewing illuminant (such as ambient light or a particular light source), gamut scaling objectives, or black utilization objectives. The test prints are rendered by the printer and read by a CMI, as described in the incorporated U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425, 6,157,735, and 6,043,909, to generate color calibration data used to determine multidimensional transformation information for accurately printing color. The transformation information obtained for different printer configurations is stored in printer configuration files, as described earlier, such as by enabling the cartridge or printer manufactures to update database 21.
In many cases where particular printer configuration is not present on the database 21, node 10 requests from profile server 16 a color transformation and the profile server computes one using the foregoing “ingredients” provided by the node 10 into a final rendering table, such as described in FIG. 13 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,909, or table as close to final as possible. The latter caveat, for example, allows for “up-to-the-minute” verification, at printer 17 using its CMI 18, that linearization functions in each of its colorant channels match the desired aims.
The processing of the measurement branch 44 is described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425 and 6,043,909 and this is only briefly reviewed herein. The profile server first checks for historical data that are generic or specific to the requesting printer configuration (step 45). New data received are evaluated for consistency with any historical data and are added to or averaged with past data as is appropriate (step 46). Evaluation procedures comprise those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425 and 6,043,909, especially in FIGS. 18 and 19 common to both patents. If significant inconsistencies are detected, they are reported to the node 10 in lieu of sending updated color transformation. Otherwise, a color transformation is sent via network 11a to node 10 for use by computer system 14 in rendering on printer 17. Optionally, the profile server includes with the color transformation a call for node 10 to conduct verification at the printer (step 47).
If a lot No. is provided at step 43, branch 48 is taken, and profile server queries the database 21 at step 50 as to whether generic profiles, comprising multidimensional color transforms and aim tone reproduction functions or linearization curves exist for the identified printing configuration. The node 10 sends a request to the profile server with printer model, cartridge lot numbers, and paper type to be printed upon by the printer, and any other criteria for use in querying the database. If results of the search are ambiguous (step 52), then a message is sent to the System Administrator and the requesting node 10 indicating what additional information is required or desirable (step 53). If the sought transformations and other information for the printing configuration are not represented in the database, the software running at the profile server schedules the preparation of profiles and notifies both System Administrator and requesting node (step 54). A default, generic profile (which may be of “one-size-fits-all” variety) is sent to the requesting node 10, if possible, with information about the printing configuration that it represents so that the receiving/requesting node (i.e., user) can evaluate its potential usefulness if it so wishes.
Scheduling the preparation of profiles may require that the manufacturer of the printer be contacted with a request for calibration data, calibration forms and materials and other relevant information about lot nos., media and the like. Although the System Administrator will usually need to be involved in solicitation of such information from a manufacturer, the process is facilitated by the addition of the registry of participating manufacturers, contact points, e-Mail addresses which may be stored in the database 21.
In the case in which the software running at the profile server queries the database 21 and suitable transformations and information are retrieved successfully at step 50, they are sent to the requesting node 10 and logged in a transaction registry within the database (step 56). It is preferred that the transaction registry be associated with the registry of manufacturers within the database so that use-of-service data can be accumulated for the participants.
At this point (step 56) the software running on the profile server may query its own information store or the requesting node directly regarding said node's capabilities for verifying the adequacy of color transformation information sent. Nodal capabilities depend not only on what is built-in to the printer, but also on what calorimeters, SOMs, imagicals, scanners, etc., extrinsic to the printer, are available at CMI 29 of node 10. Since the availability of accessories may vary with time, a query to the peripheral node is well-advised. Depending on the capabilities of the peripheral node for verification, software running at profile server may prompt the node for varying levels of verification such as those described U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425 and 6,043,909. In particular, this step may branch to step 46, depending on the peripheral response to server's query about verification capability. Both the database 21 at the profile server and the node 10 have an interest in the results of verification. At the node, successful verification assures a user that her/his print system is reproducing color to a standard. At the profile server, verification enriches the database of historical information regarding the printing configuration.
The notion of enriching the database 21 can be generalized advantageously as suggested by the following example: a printing configuration is received from the node 10. The closest configuration actually represented in the database 21 is based on a different paper stock from the one employed at the node 10. The profile server transmits the transformation information for the closest configuration with an indicator that the information is expected to be an approximation. The node 10 receives the transformation information and uses it to perform a verification. In this example, the node 10 printer 17 prints and measures one or more verification forms and either uses the information directly or transmits it to profile server in order to prepare a color-to-color′ transform that corrects, to the extent possible, for the difference in configuration. The color-to-color′ transform becomes an ingredient for the preparation of a rendering transform more exactly suited to the specific printing configuration at the node 10. Color to color′ transforms are discussed in the incorporated U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425, 6,157,735, and 6,043,909.
In addition, both identification information (e.g., lot numbers) for the cartridges along with color measurement data from CMI 18 and/or 29 may be provided to the profile server. If such is the case, branch 44 of
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,459,425 and 6,043,909 describe how the foregoing is done and how the node and profile server can determine that it was done reliably or adequately. In this manner an efficient means of enlarging and improving a centrally maintained database of color information relevant to a broad range of specific printing configurations is provided. In some cases, a full color calibration may be required in order to meet the standard of color reproduction accuracy required at the node 10. In other cases, it may be adequate to insure that the printer at node 10 is meeting standardized linearization requirements in combination with the use of “stock” or generic profiles for the given printing configuration.
In this manner, the profile server responds to a request from the host computer of
From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that there has been provided improved system and methods for color calibration of color printers. Variations and modifications in the herein described methods and apparatus in accordance with the invention will undoubtedly suggest themselves to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the foregoing description should be taken as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/209,431, filed Jul. 31, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,075,643, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/139,498, filed Aug. 25, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,459,425, issued Oct. 1, 2002, claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/056,947, filed Aug. 25, 1997, and this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/040,664, filed Jan. 7, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,995,870, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/135,692, filed Aug. 18, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,157,735, filed Dec. 5, 2000, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/606,883, filed Feb. 26, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,909, issued Mar. 28, 2000. The above-patent applications are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5185673 | Sobol | Feb 1993 | A |
5835817 | Bullock et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5859711 | Barry et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6035103 | Zuber | Mar 2000 | A |
6043894 | Van Aken et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6097471 | Buhr et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6219155 | Zuber | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246790 | Huang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256638 | Dougherty et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271937 | Zuber | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282311 | McCarthy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282312 | McCarthy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282313 | McCarthy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285784 | Spaulding et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301393 | Spaulding et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310626 | Walker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320668 | Kim | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335983 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337922 | Kumada | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6341175 | Usami | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342951 | Eschbach et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351621 | Richards et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369901 | Buhr et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373580 | Walker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380951 | Petchenkine et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381343 | Davis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388674 | Ito et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404509 | Kuwata et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414690 | Balasubramanian et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429875 | Pettigrew et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430311 | Kumada | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430312 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437792 | Ito et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459436 | Kumada et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459860 | Childers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477335 | Surya et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483524 | Petchenkine et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501850 | Setchell, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505256 | York | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516089 | McCann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522313 | Cottone | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522778 | Tamagawa | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525721 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539867 | Lee | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549652 | Persiantsev et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549653 | Osawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549732 | Yoshizaki et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559944 | Van Aken et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580524 | Weichmann et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603879 | Haikin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606165 | Barry et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615729 | Hauck et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621923 | Gennetten | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624908 | Petchenkine et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625402 | Takemoto | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633396 | Barry et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636326 | Zuber | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6644771 | Silverbrook | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654491 | Hidaka | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654567 | Karakama et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6704442 | Haikin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722281 | Yamamoto | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725772 | Martinez et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748471 | Keeney et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757450 | Gershony et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6784995 | Merle et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788305 | Ohga | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6803921 | Balasubramanian et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20020063907 | Harrington | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080335 | Silverbrook | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085749 | Setchell, Jr. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097409 | Wexler et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020140985 | Hudson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030007023 | Barclay et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030068185 | Silverbrook | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030112419 | Silverbrook | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177930 | Derhak et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040004651 | Silverbrook | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008327 | Silverbrook | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60056947 | Aug 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09139498 | Aug 1998 | US |
Child | 10209431 | US | |
Parent | 09135692 | Aug 1998 | US |
Child | 10040664 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08606883 | Feb 1996 | US |
Child | 09135692 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10209431 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10880075 | US | |
Parent | 10040664 | Jan 2002 | US |
Child | 10880075 | US |