System and method for facilitating efficient packet forwarding using a message state table in a network interface controller (NIC)

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11855881
  • Patent Number
    11,855,881
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 23, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 26, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
One embodiment provides a network interface controller (NIC). The NIC can include a storage device, a network interface, a hardware list-processing engine (LPE), and a message state table (MST) logic block. The storage device can store an MST. The network interface can couple the NIC to a network. The LPE can perform message matching on a first packet of a message received via the network interface. The MST logic block can store results of the message matching in the MST and receive a request to read the results of the message matching from the MST if the NIC receives a second packet associated with the message.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field

This is generally related to the technical field of networking. More specifically, this disclosure is related to systems and methods for facilitating MPI (message passing interface) list matching for out-of-order packets in a network interface controller (NIC).


Related Art

As network-enabled devices and applications become progressively more ubiquitous, various types of traffic as well as the ever-increasing network load continue to demand more performance from the underlying network architecture. For example, applications such as high-performance computing (HPC), media streaming, and Internet of Things (IOT) can generate different types of traffic with distinctive characteristics. As a result, in addition to conventional network performance metrics such as bandwidth and delay, network architects continue to face challenges such as scalability, versatility, and efficiency.


SUMMARY

The disclosed embodiments provide a network interface controller (NIC) capable of performing message passing interface (MPI) list matching for out-of-order packets. The NIC can include a storage device, a network interface, a hardware list-processing engine (LPE), and a message state table (MST) logic block. The storage device can store an MST. The network interface can couple the NIC to a network. The LPE can perform message matching on a first packet of a message received via the network interface. The MST logic block can store results of the message matching in the MST and receive a request to read the results of the message matching from the MST if the NIC receives a second packet associated with the message.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows an exemplary network.



FIG. 2A shows an exemplary NIC chip with a plurality of NICs.



FIG. 2B shows an exemplary architecture of a NIC.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary architecture of the message state table (MST) logic block.



FIG. 4A shows a flowchart illustrating the exemplary process of storing list-matching results in the MST.



FIG. 4B shows a flowchart illustrating the exemplary process of obtaining list-matching results from the MST.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary computer system equipped with a NIC that facilitates MPI list matching for out-of-order packets.





In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown.


Overview

The present disclosure describes systems and methods that facilitate MPI list matching for out-of-order packets of a multi-packet message or a retry packet for a single-packet message in a network interface controller (NIC). The NIC can include a message state table (MST) logic block having a plurality of interfaces for interfacing with other logic blocks of the NIC. More specifically, the MST logic block can include a match interface that can receive list-matching results for a first packet of a multi-packet message and an MST memory logic block for storing the list-matching results (which can include at least the target memory address and length) together with other header information generated by the list-processing engine (LPE). When subsequent continuation packets for the same message are received, which can be out of order, instead of requiring the list-processing engine to perform list matching again, the MST memory can be queried to provide the matching results. The MST can also be used to store matching results of unrestricted single packets, which can be used in the event of a retry.


One embodiment provides a NIC. The NIC can include a storage device, a network interface, a hardware list-processing engine (LPE), and an MST logic block. The storage device can store an MST. The network interface can couple the NIC to a network. The LPE can perform message matching on a first packet of a message received via the network interface. The MST logic block can store results of the message matching in the MST and receive a request to read the results of the message matching from the MST if the NIC receives a second packet associated with the message.


In a variation on this embodiment, the message is associated with a direct memory access (DMA) or a remote direct memory access (RDMA) operation.


In a further variation, the message can include a multi-packet PUT message, a GET message, or a single-packet atomic memory operations (AMO) message.


In a further variation, the message includes a multi-packet PUT message. The first packet is the initial packet of the multi-packet PUT message, the second packet is a continuation packet in the message, and the second packet is delivered out of order.


In a further variation, the message includes a single-packet message, and the second packet belongs to a retry message of the single-packet message.


In a variation on this embodiment, the MST logic block can set a bit associated with an entry in the MST when the LPE provides message-matching results for a message associated with the entry.


In a further variation, a request to read the message-matching results associated with the entry is processed subsequent to the bit associated with the entry being set.


In a variation on this embodiment, the MST logic block can arbitrate among respective head requests of a plurality of request queues for providing access to the MST.


In a variation on this embodiment, the MST logic block can generate a completion event in response to the network interface controller receiving a response to a last packet associated with the message. The MST can then deallocate an entry from the MST corresponding to the message.


In a variation on this embodiment, a respective entry in the MST is associated with an index, and wherein the index is available for reuse subsequent to the corresponding entry being deallocated from the MST.


In this disclosure, the description in conjunction with FIG. 1 is associated with the network architecture, and the description in conjunction with FIG. 2A and onward provide more details on the architecture and operations associated with a NIC that supports efficient list matching for out-of-order packets.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary network. In this example, a network 100 of switches, which can also be referred to as a “switch fabric,” can include switches 102, 104, 106, 108, and 110. Each switch can have a unique address or ID within switch fabric 100. Various types of devices and networks can be coupled to a switch fabric. For example, a storage array 112 can be coupled to switch fabric 100 via switch 110; an InfiniBand (IB) based HPC network 114 can be coupled to switch fabric 100 via switch 108; a number of end hosts, such as host 116, can be coupled to switch fabric 100 via switch 104; and an IP/Ethernet network 118 can be coupled to switch fabric 100 via switch 102. In general, a switch can have edge ports and fabric ports. An edge port can couple to a device that is external to the fabric. A fabric port can couple to another switch within the fabric via a fabric link. Typically, traffic can be injected into switch fabric 100 via an ingress port of an edge switch, and leave switch fabric 100 via an egress port of another (or the same) edge switch. An ingress link can couple a NIC of an edge device (for example, an HPC end host) to an ingress edge port of an edge switch. Switch fabric 100 can then transport the traffic to an egress edge switch, which in turn can deliver the traffic to a destination edge device via another NIC.


Exemplary NIC Architecture



FIG. 2A shows an exemplary NIC chip with a plurality of NICs. With reference to the example in FIG. 1, a NIC chip 200 can be a custom application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) designed for host 116 to work with switch fabric 100. In this example, chip 200 can provide two independent NICs 202 and 204. A respective NIC of chip 200 can be equipped with a host interface (HI) (e.g., an interface for connecting to the host processor) and one high-speed network interface (HNI) for communicating with a link coupled to switch fabric 100 of FIG. 1. For example, NIC 202 can include an HI 210 and an HNI 220, and NIC 204 can include an HI 211 and an HNI 221.


In some embodiments, HI 210 can be a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) or a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) interface. HI 210 can be coupled to a host via a host connection 201, which can include N (e.g., N can be 16 in some chips) PCle Gen 4 lanes capable of operating at signaling rates up to 25 Gbps per lane. HNI 210 can facilitate a high-speed network connection 203, which can communicate with a link in switch fabric 100 of FIG. 1. HNI 210 can operate at aggregate rates of either 100 Gbps or 200 Gbps using M (e.g., M can be 4 in some chips) full-duplex serial lanes. Each of the M lanes can operate at 25 Gbps or 50 Gbps based on non-return-to-zero (NRZ) modulation or pulse amplitude modulation 4 (PAM4), respectively. HNI 220 can support the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3 Ethernet-based protocols as well as an enhanced frame format that provides support for higher rates of small messages.


NIC 202 can support one or more of: point-to-point message passing based on message passing interface (MPI), remote memory access (RMA) operations, offloading and progression of bulk data collective operations, and Ethernet packet processing. When the host issues an MPI message, NIC 202 can match the corresponding message type. Furthermore, NIC 202 can implement both eager protocol and rendezvous protocol for MPI, thereby offloading the corresponding operations from the host.


Furthermore, the RMA operations supported by NIC 202 can include PUT, GET, and atomic memory operations (AMO). NIC 202 can provide reliable transport. For example, if NIC 202 is a source NIC, NIC 202 can provide a retry mechanism for idempotent operations. Furthermore, connection-based error detection and retry mechanism can be used for ordered operations that may manipulate a target state. The hardware of NIC 202 can maintain the state necessary for the retry mechanism. In this way, NIC 202 can remove the burden from the host (e.g., the software). The policy that dictates the retry mechanism can be specified by the host via the driver software, thereby ensuring flexibility in NIC 202.


Furthermore, NIC 202 can facilitate triggered operations, a general-purpose mechanism for offloading, and progression of dependent sequences of operations, such as bulk data collectives. NIC 202 can support an application programming interface (API) (e.g., libfabric API) that facilitates fabric communication services provided by switch fabric 100 of FIG. 1 to applications running on host 116. NIC 202 can also support a low-level network programming interface, such as Portals API. In addition, NIC 202 can provide efficient Ethernet packet processing, which can include efficient transmission if NIC 202 is a sender, flow steering if NIC 202 is a target, and checksum computation. Moreover, NIC 202 can support virtualization (e.g., using containers or virtual machines).



FIG. 2B shows an exemplary architecture of a NIC. In NIC 202, the port macro of HNI 220 can facilitate low-level Ethernet operations, such as physical coding sublayer (PCS) and media access control (MAC). In addition, NIC 202 can provide support for link layer retry (LLR). Incoming packets can be parsed by parser 228 and stored in buffer 229. Buffer 229 can be a PFC Buffer provisioned to buffer a threshold amount (e.g., one microsecond) of delay bandwidth. HNI 220 can also include control transmission unit 224 and control reception unit 226 for managing outgoing and incoming packets, respectively.


NIC 202 can include a command queue (CQ) unit 230. CQ unit 230 can be responsible for fetching and issuing host side commands. CQ unit 230 can include command queues 232 and schedulers 234. Command queues 232 can include two independent sets of queues for initiator commands (PUT, GET, etc.) and target commands (append, search, etc.), respectively. Command queues 232 can be implemented as circular buffers. In some embodiments, command queues 232 can be maintained in the main memory of the host. Applications running on the host can write to command queues 232 directly. Schedulers 234 can include two separate schedulers for initiator commands and target commands, respectively. The initiator commands are sorted into flow queues 236 based on a hash function. One of flow queues 236 can be allocated to a unique flow. Furthermore, CQ unit 230 can further include a triggered operations module (or logic block) 238, which is responsible for queuing and dispatching triggered commands.


Outbound transfer engine (OXE) 240 can pull commands from flow queues 236 in order to process them for dispatch. OXE 240 can include an address translation request unit (ATRU) 244 that can send address translation requests to address translation unit (ATU) 212. ATU 212 can provide virtual to physical address translation on behalf of different engines, such as OXE 240, inbound transfer engine (IXE) 250, and event engine (EE) 216. ATU 212 can maintain a large translation cache 214. ATU 212 can either perform translation itself or may use host-based address translation services (ATS). OXE 240 can also include message chopping unit (MCU) 246, which can fragment a large message into packets of sizes corresponding to a maximum transmission unit (MTU). MCU 246 can include a plurality of MCU modules. When an MCU module becomes available, the MCU module can obtain the next command from an assigned flow queue. The data received from the host can be written into data buffer 242. The MCU module can then send the packet header, the corresponding traffic class, and the packet size to traffic shaper 248. Shaper 248 can determine which requests presented by MCU 246 can proceed to the network.


Subsequently, the selected packet can be sent to packet and connection tracking (PCT) 270. PCT 270 can store the packet in a queue 274. PCT 270 can also maintain state information for outbound commands and update the state information as responses are returned. PCT 270 can also maintain packet state information (e.g., allowing responses to be matched to requests), message state information (e.g., tracking the progress of multi-packet messages), initiator completion state information, and retry state information (e.g., maintaining the information required to retry a command if a request or response is lost). If a response is not returned within a threshold time, the corresponding command can be obtained from retry buffer 272 to facilitate the retry operation. PCT 270 can facilitate connection management for initiator and target commands based on source tables 276 and target tables 278, respectively. For example, PCT 270 can update its source tables 276 to track the necessary state for reliable delivery of the packet and message completion notification. PCT 270 can forward outgoing packets to HNI 220, which stores the packets in outbound queue 222.


NIC 202 can also include an IXE 250, which provides packet processing if NIC 202 is a target or a destination. IXE 250 can obtain the incoming packets from HNI 220. Parser 256 can parse the incoming packets and pass the corresponding packet information to a List Processing Engine (LPE) 264 or a message state table (MST) 266 for matching. LPE 264 can match incoming messages to buffers. LPE 264 can determine the buffer and start address to be used by each message. LPE 264 can also manage a pool of list entries 262 used to represent buffers and unexpected messages. MST 266 can store matching results and the information required to generate target side completion events. MST 266 can be used by unrestricted operations, including multi-packet PUT commands, and single-packet and multi-packet GET commands.


Subsequently, parser 256 can store the packets in packet buffer 254. IXE 250 can obtain the results of the matching for conflict checking. DMA write and AMO module 252 can then issue updates to the memory generated by write and AMO operations. If a packet includes a command that generates target side memory read operations (e.g., a GET response), the packet can be passed to the OXE 240. NIC 202 can also include an EE 216, which can receive requests to generate event notifications from other modules or units in NIC 202. An event notification can specify that either a fill event or a counting event is generated. EE 216 can manage event queues, located within host processor memory, to which it writes full events. EE 216 can forward counting events to CQ unit 230.


Message State Table


In MPI, send/receive operations can be identified with an envelope that can include a number of parameters such as source, destination, message ID, and communicator. The envelope can be used to match a given message to its corresponding user buffer. The whole list of buffers posted by a given process is referred to as the matching list, and the process of finding the corresponding buffer from the matching list to a given buffer is referred to as list matching or tag matching.


In some embodiments, processing of the MPI messages, including both the “eager” message and the “rendezvous” message, can be offloaded to the NIC hardware, which can also provide hardware acceleration of MPI list matching. However, the MPI lists can be required to be matched in order. In situations where packets are received out of order, the list-processing engine in the NIC cannot maintain order and can produce incorrect matching results. Note that out-of-order delivery of network packets can provide certain performance advantages and can sometimes be the preferred packet-delivery method.


For example, an application, which may run on a source device of a NIC, can issue a message indicating a data operation (e.g., a “GET” or a “PUT” command of remote direct memory access (RDMA)) for a memory location of a remote target device. The NICs of the source and target devices can be referred to as the source and target NICs, respectively. The operation can be an idempotent or a non-idempotent operation. An idempotent operation may be executed more than once without causing an error. On the other hand, a non-idempotent operation can be executed once. Executing a non-idempotent operation more than once may cause an error. Typically, if an idempotent RDMA operation is not completed, instead of the target NIC executing the operation, the software of the target device (e.g., an operating system) may replay the operation.


The message indicating the operation can be a large message that may be transmitted via a plurality of packets. Ordered delivery of such a large message may incur significant overhead, such as transmission over a predetermined path, strict enforcement of in-order packet transmission, and packet drops for out-of-order packets, which can lead to inefficient data forwarding. To solve this problem, the source NIC can use both ordered and unordered packet delivery for the message to improve performance while preserving order at message boundaries. In particular, if the message is for an idempotent operation, the NIC may send some of the packets based on unordered delivery. During operation, the source NIC may receive a message larger than a maximum transmission unit (MTU). Accordingly, the source NIC can generate a plurality of packets from the message based on the MTU. Since the plurality of packets may include a portion of the message in their respective payloads, these packets can be referred to as a packet stream. The source NIC can send a first packet using ordered delivery to the target NIC. Subsequent to receiving a response to the first packet, the source NIC can determine whether the number of the remaining packets of the packet stream is greater than a threshold. In some embodiments, the threshold can correspond to a packet number for which the transfer time is greater than twice the round-trip time (RTT) between the source and target NICs.


If the number of remaining packets is greater than the threshold, the source NIC can initiate an in-out-in (IOI) packet transfer for the packet stream. To facilitate IOI packet transfer, the source NIC can forward an initial set of packets with ordered delivery. Each of these packets can include a sequence number and an indicator indicating in-order delivery. The target NIC may receive one or more packets, and issue corresponding responses. A response can also be a cumulative response since these packets are ordered packets. However, since the responses may not be ordered, the source NIC may receive any of the responses. Based on the first received response, the source NIC can determine that all packets up to the sequence number of the response have been successfully received by the target NIC.


The source NIC can then switch to unordered delivery for the subsequent packets. When the number of remaining packets becomes less than a switchover threshold (i.e., the packets with the end of the message), the source NIC can switch back to ordered delivery. In some embodiments, the switchover threshold can indicate the number of outstanding packets. An outstanding packet is a packet for which the source NIC has not received a response yet. To further ensure that the last packet is delivered in order, the source NIC may refrain from sending the last packet of the packet stream until the source NIC has received responses for all unordered packets. In this way, the source NIC can use IOI packet transfer that can incorporate both ordered and unordered packet delivery, thereby facilitating efficient packet forwarding for large messages.


To facilitate the IOI packet transfer, the NIC can implement a message state table (MST), which stores previous results of message matching. The NIC can store the MST in a storage device (e.g., a memory module) of the NIC. For example, the MST can store the matching result of an initial packet of the packet stream, which is delivered in order. When subsequent packets of the same packet stream are received, rather than having the list-processing engine to perform list matching and preserve order, the MST can be queried to obtain the corresponding matching result.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary architecture of the MST logic block. MST logic block 300 can include a plurality of interfaces and a plurality of subblocks that operate together and also interface with other blocks in the NIC to facilitate the list-matching operation for out-of-order packets.


The interfaces of MST logic block 300 can include an MST-request interface 302, an MST-match interface 304, a MST-result interface 306, a first event-generation-and-deallocation interface 308, and a second event-generation-and-deallocation interface 310, an event-engine interface 312, and a deallocated-index interface 314. The subblocks of MST logic block 300 can include a set of MST-request first-in, first-out (FIFO) queues 322, an MST-match FIFO 324, a first event-generation FIFO 326, a second event-generation FIFO 328, an MST memory 330, and a match-done-bits data block 332.


MST-request interface 302 can allow MST logic block 300 to receive requests from the IXE to read the matching result for each communication packet of an unrestricted message. Note that the NIC can support both restricted and unrestricted transfers, which differ in their ordering and in their target behavior. Restricted transfers may be unordered and unrestricted transfers require ordering to be maintained, at least at the message level. Note that restricted PUT, GET, and AMO operations may not use MST logic block 300.


MST-match interface 304 can allow MST logic block 300 to receive matching results for an unrestricted message from the IXE. This update may occur on the first packet of the message. MST-result interface 306 can allow MST logic block 300 to return back the matching result stored in MST memory 330.


First event-generation-and-deallocation interface 308 can allow MST logic block 300 to receive a notification from the packet and connection tracking (PCT) module, when the PCT module receives a clear request for the last packet of an unrestricted single- or multi-packet GET message, the notification can cause MST logic block 300 to generate a completion event and deallocate the corresponding entry for that GET message. This path also includes packet error notification.


Second event-generation-and-deallocation interface 310 can provide a path for MST logic block 300 to receive two types of commands from the PCT packet-out block. The first type of command is event generation and deallocation. When the last response of a multi-packet unrestricted PUT message is sent out by the PCT packet-out block, it notifies the MST to generate a completion event and deallocate the entry for that message. The second type of command can be a command indicating a packet error for a PUT or GET message. When the PCT module sends out an error response packet of either an unrestricted multi-packet PUT message or an unrestricted single- or multi-packet GET message, the PCT module notifies MST logic block 300 and the error is logged in the MST entry for that message.


Event-engine interface 312 may allow MST logic block 300 to generate and send an event to the event engine after a message has been complete. Deallocated-index interface 314 may allow MST logic block 300 to notify the PCT module that an entry has been deallocated and the MST index can be reused.


MST-request FIFOs 322 can include a set of FIFOs that accept MST requests from the IXE via MST-request interface 302. In some embodiments, MST-request FIFOs 322 can include 32 linked-list FIFOs. MST-match FIFO 324 is a FIFO that accepts MST matching results from the IXE via MST-match interface 304.


First event-generation FIFO 326 can include a FIFO that accepts event-generation/deallocation requests from the PCT target-side clear engine via first event-generation-and-deallocation interface 308. Second event-generation FIFO 328 can include a FIFO that accepts event-generation/deallocation request and PUT and GET error updates for messages from the PCT packet outbound path via second event-generation-and-deallocation interface 310.


MST memory 330 can include a table that stores the matching results (which can include at least the target memory address and length) together with other header information generated by the LPE. In some embodiments, MST memory 330 can include a table that can hold 2048 entries. MST memory 330 can include a content-addressable memory (CAM) that can be used to identify the entry in the table to use for a message. In some embodiments, the CAM can be located in the PCT module. The PCT module is responsible for managing the credits and allocation of the MST entries. Before the IXE sends in an MST request or MST match to MST logic block 300, the IXE may obtain the MST index from the PCT. The request can then be sent, via the appropriate interface, to MST logic block 300 along with the index that it is assigned.


Match-done-bits data block 332 can include a set of bits that specify whether matching results have been provided for each of the messages. In the event that MST memory logic block 300 includes a 2K-entry table, the set of bits can include 2048 bits.



FIG. 4A shows a flowchart illustrating the exemplary process of storing list-matching results in the MST. At the target NIC, the IXE can receive the initial packet of an unrestricted message (operation 402) and subsequently obtain the list-matching results that include the target address and other information for this message through a list-matching process (operation 404). The initial packet can include the message envelope. The list-matching process can be performed by a hardware list-processing engine. The unrestricted message can be associated with a DMA or RDMA operation (e.g., PUT or GET). For multi-packet PUT and all GET messages, the IXE can send the matching results to the MST. The matching results can be sent to MST-match FIFO via the MST-match interface.


Subsequent to MST memory block, which holds the MST, storing the matching results forwarded by the MST-match FIFO (operation 406), the MST can set a corresponding “match-done” bit (operation 408), indicating that the matching results are available and can be used when processing the rest of the message.



FIG. 4B shows a flowchart illustrating the exemplary process of obtaining list-matching results from the MST. During operation, the IXE of the target NIC can receive a subsequent continuation packet for a message (operation 412), and send an MST request to read back the matching result of the message via the MST-request interface (operation 414). The MST request can enter one of the MST-request FIFOs (operation 416). In some embodiments, the MST logic block can select an MST-request FIFO to enqueue the MST request based on a hashed result of the MST index and the traffic class (TC) number of the request. The MST index can have multiple bits (e.g., 11-bit) and the TC number can have a smaller set of bits (e.g., 3-bit).


The MST can check the corresponding “match-done” bit of the head of each FIFO to determine if it is set and if there is a credit available to return the matching results via the match-result interface (operation 418). If so, the MST request at the head of the FIFO is allowed to access the MST (operation 420). This is because the continuation packet may arrive before the matching result of the first packet has arrived. This qualification process allows the MST logic block to block the progress of the continuation packets until the result of the match is available. When checking for credit availability for returning the result of a match request, the MST logic block can use two credit pools dependent on whether the request is a PUT or a GET. Each type of message gets its own credit pool.


All qualified FIFOs can be arbitrated (e.g., using round-robin) to access the MST (operation 422). The matching result corresponding to the granted match request can then be returned to the IXE via the MST-result interface (operation 424). Once the IXE obtains the matching result for each continuation packet, the IXE can write the payload data to memory (operation 426).


In the examples shown in FIGS. 4A-4B, the MST is used for unrestricted multi-packet messages. In practice, the MST can also store the matching results for unrestricted single-packet GET messages. The matching result for such a message can be sent through by the IXE to the MST via the MST-match interface. There is no continuation packet for this type of message, and the MST is only used for remembering the matching result in case of a retry. In the case of the retry, when the IXE requests the MST index, the PCT will return the already existing MST index, and the information that the packet is a retry packet. This allows the IXE to recover the original matching results from the MST entry. On the other hand, sending the match request to the LPE a second time would be an error.


In addition, the MST may not be used for any other single-packet requests. However, the MST is not used for any restricted messages. Matching results can be read from the MST for continuation packets, which may be delivered in any order.


The processing of the retry packets depends on the packet type. If the retry packet is an unrestricted GET, an MST request can be sent to read back the matching result via the MST-request interface and the MST-request FIFOs. This is because the matching operation performed by the LPE may not be idempotent. To replay the GET response, the IXE may need to obtain the original matching result stored in the MST. If the retry packet is an unrestricted PUT or AMO, the PCT can detect that the request is a retry and then recreates a response from the target result store (TRS) and directs the IXE to drop the packet. The TRS can store packet-level information for non-idempotent operations. Hence, the MST is not accessed.


The MST can also log errors that have occurred at the message level for unrestricted multi-packet PUT or GET messages, and unrestricted single-packet GET messages. When the PCT sends out an error response packet for either an unrestricted multi-packet PUT message or an unrestricted single- or multi-packet GET message, an error notification can be sent to the MST through the second event-generation FIFO and the second event-generation-and-deallocation interface. These errors are accumulated in the corresponding MST entries.


It is also the responsibility of the MST logic block to generate and send an event to the event engine through the event-engine interface once a message that it is tracking is complete. For an unrestricted multi-packet PUT message, once its last-response packet is sent out by the PCT, the MST logic block can be notified to generate an event and also to deallocate the entry through a path that includes the second event-generation FIFO and the second event-generation-and-deallocation interface. For an unrestricted single-packet or multi-packet GET message, after a “clear” command is received by the PCT for the message, indicating that a response to the last packet in the message is received, the MST logic block is notified to generate the event and also to deallocate the MST entry through a path that includes the first event-generation FIFO and the first event-generation-and-deallocation interface. These notifications pass through the first and second event-generation FIFOs before arbitrating for access of the MST to generate the event. Once the event is generated, it is sent to the event engine through the event-engine interface. The corresponding MST entry is then deallocated from the MST and the index of the entry can be sent back to the PCT for reuse through the deallocated-Index interface.


Exemplary Computer System



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary computer system equipped with a NIC that facilitates MPI list matching for out-of-order packets. Computer system 550 includes a processor 552, a memory device 554, and a storage device 556. Memory device 554 can include a volatile memory device (e.g., a dual in-line memory module (DIMM)). Furthermore, computer system 550 can be coupled to a keyboard 562, a pointing device 564, and a display device 566. Storage device 556 can store an operating system 570. An application 572 can operate on operating system 570.


Computer system 550 can be equipped with a host interface coupling a NIC 520 that facilitates MPI list matching for out-of-order packets. NIC 520 can provide one or more HNIs to computer system 550. NIC 520 can be coupled to a switch 502 via one of the HNIs. NIC 520 can include a MST logic block 530, as described in conjunction with FIG. 2B and FIG. 3. MST logic block 530 can include an MST-request logic block 532 that receives MST requests, an MST-match logic block 534 that may receive matching results from the list-matching engine, and an MST 536 for storing the matching results.


In summary, the present disclosure describes a NIC that implements an MST. The NIC can include a storage device, a network interface, a hardware LPE, and an MST logic block. The storage device can store an MST. The network interface can couple the NIC to a network. The LPE can perform message matching on a first packet of a message received via the network interface. The MST logic block can store results of the message matching in the MST and receive a request to read the results of the message matching from the MST if the NIC receives a second packet associated with the message.


The methods and processes described above can be performed by hardware logic blocks, modules, logic blocks, or apparatus. The hardware logic blocks, modules, or apparatus can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), dedicated or shared processors that execute a piece of code at a particular time, and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware logic blocks, modules, or apparatus are activated, they perform the methods and processes included within them.


The methods and processes described herein can also be embodied as code or data, which can be stored in a storage device or computer-readable storage medium. When a processor reads and executes the stored code or data, the processor can perform these methods and processes.


The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A network interface controller (NIC), comprising: a storage device to store a message state table (MST);a network interface to couple a network;a hardware list-processing engine (LPE) to perform message matching on a first packet of a message received via the network interface; andan MST logic block to: store results of the message matching in the MST;receive a request to read the results of the message matching from the MST in response to the network interface controller receiving a second packet associated with the message;set a bit associated with a respective entry in the MST in response to the LPE providing message-matching results for a message associated with the respective entry;determine qualified request queues of a plurality of request queues based on the bit associated with the respective MST entry; andarbitrate among respective head requests of the qualified request queues for providing access to the MST.
  • 2. The network interface controller of claim 1, wherein the message is associated with a direct memory access (DMA) or a remote direct memory access (RDMA) operation.
  • 3. The network interface controller of claim 2, wherein the message comprises a multi-packet PUT message, a GET message, or a single-packet atomic memory operations (AMO) message.
  • 4. The network interface controller of claim 3, wherein the message comprises a multi-packet PUT message, wherein the first packet is the initial packet of the multi-packet PUT message, wherein the second packet is a continuation packet in the message, and wherein the second packet is delivered out of order.
  • 5. The network interface controller of claim 4, wherein the message comprises a single-packet message, and wherein the second packet belongs to a retry message of the single-packet message.
  • 6. The network interface controller of claim 1, wherein a request to read the message-matching results associated with the entry is processed subsequent to the bit associated with the entry being set.
  • 7. The network interface controller of claim 1, wherein the MST logic block is further to: generate a completion event in response to the network interface controller receiving a response to a last packet associated with the message; anddeallocate an entry from the MST corresponding to the message.
  • 8. The network interface controller of claim 1, wherein a respective entry in the MST is associated with an index, and wherein the index is available for reuse subsequent to the corresponding entry being deallocated from the MST.
  • 9. A method, comprising: storing, in a storage device of a network interface controller (NIC), a message state table (MST);performing, by a hardware list-processing engine (LPE) of the NIC, message matching on a first packet of a message received via a network interface coupling the NIC to a network;storing results of the message matching in the MST;receiving a request to read the results of the message matching from the MST in response to the NIC receiving a second packet associated with the message;setting a bit associated with a respective entry in the MST in response to the LPE providing message-matching results for a message associated with the respective entry;determining qualified request queues of a plurality of request queues based on the bit associated with the respective MST entry; andarbitrating among respective head requests of the qualified request queues for providing access to the MST.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the message is associated with a direct memory access (DMA) or a remote direct memory access (RDMA) operation.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the message comprises a multi-packet PUT message, a GET message, or a single-packet atomic memory operations (AMO) message.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the message comprises a multi-packet PUT message, wherein the first packet is the initial packet of the multi-packet PUT message, wherein the second packet is a continuation packet in the message, and wherein the second packet is delivered out of order.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the message comprises a single-packet message, and wherein the second packet belongs to a retry message of the single-packet message.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, wherein a request to read the message-matching results associated with the entry is processed subsequent to the bit associated with the entry being set.
  • 15. The method of claim 9, further comprising: generating a completion event in response to the network interface controller receiving a response to a last packet associated with the message; anddeallocating an entry from the MST corresponding to the message.
  • 16. The method of claim 9, wherein a respective entry in the MST is associated with an index, and wherein the index is available for reuse subsequent to the corresponding entry being deallocated from the MST.
  • 17. The network interface controller of claim 1, wherein determining the qualified request queues is further based on determining that a credit is available for returning the message-matching results, andwherein a respective type of message uses a corresponding respective credit pool.
  • 18. The network interface controller of claim 8, wherein the MST logic block is further to: select a queue into which to enqueue the request based on the index and a traffic class number of the request.
  • 19. The method of claim 9, further comprising: determining the qualified request queues further based on determining that a credit is available for returning the message-matching results,wherein a respective type of message uses a corresponding respective credit pool.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, further comprising: selecting a queue into which to enqueue the request based on the index and a traffic class number of the request.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2020/024241 3/23/2020 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/236268 11/26/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (433)
Number Name Date Kind
4807118 Lin et al. Feb 1989 A
5138615 Lamport et al. Aug 1992 A
5457687 Newman Oct 1995 A
5937436 Watkins Aug 1999 A
5960178 Cochinwala et al. Sep 1999 A
5970232 Passint et al. Oct 1999 A
5983332 Watkins Nov 1999 A
6112265 Harriman et al. Aug 2000 A
6230252 Passint et al. May 2001 B1
6246682 Roy et al. Jun 2001 B1
6493347 Sindhu et al. Dec 2002 B2
6545981 Garcia et al. Apr 2003 B1
6633580 Toerudbakken et al. Oct 2003 B1
6674720 Passint et al. Jan 2004 B1
6714553 Poole et al. Mar 2004 B1
6728211 Peris et al. Apr 2004 B1
6732212 Sugahara et al. May 2004 B2
6735173 Lenoski et al. May 2004 B1
6894974 Aweva et al. May 2005 B1
7023856 Washabaugh et al. Apr 2006 B1
7133940 Blightman et al. Nov 2006 B2
7218637 Best et al. May 2007 B1
7269180 Bly et al. Sep 2007 B2
7305487 Blumrich et al. Dec 2007 B2
7337285 Tanoue Feb 2008 B2
7397797 Alfieri et al. Jul 2008 B2
7430559 Lomet Sep 2008 B2
7441006 Biran et al. Oct 2008 B2
7464174 Ngai Dec 2008 B1
7483442 Torudbakken et al. Jan 2009 B1
7562366 Pope et al. Jul 2009 B2
7593329 Kwan et al. Sep 2009 B2
7596628 Aloni et al. Sep 2009 B2
7620791 Wentzlaff et al. Nov 2009 B1
7633869 Morris et al. Dec 2009 B1
7639616 Manula et al. Dec 2009 B1
7734894 Wentzlaff et al. Jun 2010 B1
7774461 Tanaka et al. Aug 2010 B2
7782869 Chitlur Srinivasa Aug 2010 B1
7796579 Bruss Sep 2010 B2
7856026 Finan et al. Dec 2010 B1
7933282 Gupta et al. Apr 2011 B1
7953002 Opsasnick May 2011 B2
7975120 Sabbatini, Jr. et al. Jul 2011 B2
8014278 Subramanian et al. Sep 2011 B1
8023521 Woo et al. Sep 2011 B2
8050180 Judd Nov 2011 B2
8077606 Mark Dec 2011 B1
8103788 Miranda Jan 2012 B1
8160085 Voruganti et al. Apr 2012 B2
8175107 Yalagandula et al. May 2012 B1
8249072 Sugumar et al. Aug 2012 B2
8281013 Mundkur et al. Oct 2012 B2
8352727 Chen et al. Jan 2013 B2
8353003 Noehring et al. Jan 2013 B2
8443151 Tang et al. May 2013 B2
8473783 Andrade et al. Jun 2013 B2
8543534 Alves et al. Sep 2013 B2
8619793 Lavian et al. Dec 2013 B2
8626957 Blumrich et al. Jan 2014 B2
8650582 Archer et al. Feb 2014 B2
8706832 Blocksome Apr 2014 B2
8719543 Kaminski et al. May 2014 B2
8811183 Anand et al. Aug 2014 B1
8948175 Bly et al. Feb 2015 B2
8971345 McCanne et al. Mar 2015 B1
9001663 Attar et al. Apr 2015 B2
9053012 Northcott et al. Jun 2015 B1
9088496 Vaidya et al. Jul 2015 B2
9094327 Jacobs et al. Jul 2015 B2
9178782 Matthews et al. Nov 2015 B2
9208071 Talagala et al. Dec 2015 B2
9218278 Talagala et al. Dec 2015 B2
9231876 Mir et al. Jan 2016 B2
9231888 Bogdanski et al. Jan 2016 B2
9239804 Kegel et al. Jan 2016 B2
9269438 Nachimuthu et al. Feb 2016 B2
9276864 Pradeep Mar 2016 B1
9436651 Underwood et al. Sep 2016 B2
9455915 Sinha et al. Sep 2016 B2
9460178 Bashyam et al. Oct 2016 B2
9479426 Munger et al. Oct 2016 B2
9496991 Plamondon et al. Nov 2016 B2
9544234 Markine Jan 2017 B1
9548924 Pettit et al. Jan 2017 B2
9594521 Blagodurov et al. Mar 2017 B2
9635121 Mathew et al. Apr 2017 B2
9742855 Shuler et al. Aug 2017 B2
9762488 Previdi et al. Sep 2017 B2
9762497 Kishore et al. Sep 2017 B2
9830273 Bk et al. Nov 2017 B2
9838500 Ilan et al. Dec 2017 B1
9853900 Mula et al. Dec 2017 B1
9887923 Chorafakis et al. Feb 2018 B2
10003544 Liu et al. Jun 2018 B2
10009270 Stark et al. Jun 2018 B1
10031857 Menachem et al. Jul 2018 B2
10050896 Yang et al. Aug 2018 B2
10061613 Brooker et al. Aug 2018 B1
10063481 Jiang et al. Aug 2018 B1
10089220 McKelvie et al. Oct 2018 B1
10169060 Mncent et al. Jan 2019 B1
10178035 Dillon Jan 2019 B2
10200279 Aljaedi Feb 2019 B1
10218634 Aldebert et al. Feb 2019 B2
10270700 Burnette et al. Apr 2019 B2
10305772 Zur et al. May 2019 B2
10331590 Macnamara et al. Jun 2019 B2
10353833 Hagspiel et al. Jul 2019 B2
10454835 Contavalli et al. Oct 2019 B2
10498672 Graham et al. Dec 2019 B2
10567307 Fairhurst et al. Feb 2020 B2
10728173 Agrawal et al. Jul 2020 B1
10802828 Volpe et al. Oct 2020 B1
10817502 Talagala et al. Oct 2020 B2
11128561 Matthews et al. Sep 2021 B1
11271869 Agrawal et al. Mar 2022 B1
11416749 Bshara et al. Aug 2022 B2
11444886 Stawitzky et al. Sep 2022 B1
20010010692 Sindhu et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010047438 Forin Nov 2001 A1
20020174279 Wynne et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030016808 Hu et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030041168 Musoll Feb 2003 A1
20030110455 Baumgartner et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030174711 Shankar Sep 2003 A1
20030200363 Futral Oct 2003 A1
20030223420 Ferolito Dec 2003 A1
20040008716 Stiliadis Jan 2004 A1
20040059828 Hooper et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040095882 Hamzah et al. May 2004 A1
20040133634 Luke et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040223452 Santos et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050021837 Haselhorst et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050047334 Paul et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050088969 Carlsen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091396 Nilakantan et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050108444 Flauaus et al. May 2005 A1
20050108518 Pandya May 2005 A1
20050152274 Simpson Jul 2005 A1
20050182854 Pinkerton et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050270974 Mayhew Dec 2005 A1
20050270976 Yang et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060023705 Zoranovic et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060067347 Naik et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075480 Noehring et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060174251 Pope et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060203728 Kwan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070061433 Reynolds et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070070901 Aloni et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070198804 Moyer Aug 2007 A1
20070211746 Oshikiri et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070242611 Archer et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070268825 Corwin et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080013453 Chiang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080013549 Okagawa et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080071757 Ichiriu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080084864 Archer et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091915 Moertl et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126553 Boucher May 2008 A1
20080147881 Krishnamurthy et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159138 Shepherd et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080253289 Naven et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090003212 Kwan et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010157 Holmes et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090013175 Elliott Jan 2009 A1
20090055496 Garg et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090092046 Naven et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090141621 Fan et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090198958 Arimilli et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090259713 Blumrich et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090285222 Hoover et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100061241 Sindhu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100169608 Kuo et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100172260 Kwan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100183024 Gupta Jul 2010 A1
20100220595 Petersen Sep 2010 A1
20100274876 Kagan et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100302942 Shankar et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100316053 Miyoshi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110051724 Scott et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066824 Bestler Mar 2011 A1
20110072179 Lacroute et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110099326 Jung et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110110383 Yang et al. May 2011 A1
20110128959 Bando et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110158096 Leung et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110158248 Vorunganti et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110164496 Loh et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110173370 Jacobs et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110264822 Ferguson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276699 Pedersen Nov 2011 A1
20110280125 Jayakumar Nov 2011 A1
20110320724 Mejdrich et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120093505 Yeap et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120102506 Hopmann et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120117423 Andrade et al. May 2012 A1
20120137075 Vorbach May 2012 A1
20120144064 Parker et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120144065 Parker et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120147752 Ashwood-Smith et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170462 Sinha Jul 2012 A1
20120170575 Mehra Jul 2012 A1
20120213118 Lindsay et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120250512 Jagadeeswaran et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120287821 Godfrey et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120297083 Ferguson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300669 Zahavi Nov 2012 A1
20120314707 Epps et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130010636 Regula Jan 2013 A1
20130039169 Schlansker et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060944 Archer et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130103777 Kagan et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130121178 Mainaud et al. May 2013 A1
20130136090 Liu et al. May 2013 A1
20130182704 Jacobs et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130194927 Yamaguchi et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130201983 Ghosh Aug 2013 A1
20130203422 Masputra et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130205002 Wang et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130208593 Nandagopal Aug 2013 A1
20130246552 Underwood et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130290673 Archer et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130301645 Bogdanski et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130304988 Totolos et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130311525 Neerincx et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130329577 Suzuki et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130336164 Yang et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140019661 Hormuth et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032695 Michels et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140036680 Lih et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140064082 Yeung et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140095753 Crupnicoff et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140098675 Frost et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140119367 Han et al. May 2014 A1
20140122560 Ramey et al. May 2014 A1
20140129664 McDaniel et al. May 2014 A1
20140133292 Yamatsu et al. May 2014 A1
20140136646 Tamir et al. May 2014 A1
20140169173 Naouri et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140185621 Decusatis et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140189174 Ajanovic et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207881 Nussle et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211804 Makikeni et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226488 Shamis et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140241164 Cociglio et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140258438 Ayoub Sep 2014 A1
20140301390 Scott et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140307554 Basso et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140325013 Tamir et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140328172 Kumar et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140347997 Bergamasco et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140362698 Arad Dec 2014 A1
20140369360 Carlstrom Dec 2014 A1
20140379847 Williams Dec 2014 A1
20150003247 Mejia et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150006849 Xu et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150009823 Ganga et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150026361 Matthews et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150029848 Jain Jan 2015 A1
20150055476 Decusatis et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150055661 Boucher et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150067095 Gopal et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150089495 Persson et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150103667 Elias et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150124826 Edsall et al. May 2015 A1
20150146527 Kishore et al. May 2015 A1
20150154004 Aggarwal Jun 2015 A1
20150161064 Pope Jun 2015 A1
20150180782 Rimmer et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150186318 Kim et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150193262 Archer et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150195388 Snyder et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150208145 Parker et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150220449 Stark et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150229557 Kim Aug 2015 A1
20150237180 Swartzentruber et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150244617 Nakil et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150244804 Warfield et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150261434 Kagan et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150263955 Talaski et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150263994 Haramaty et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150288626 Aybay Oct 2015 A1
20150301963 Tatar Oct 2015 A1
20150365337 Pannell Dec 2015 A1
20150370586 Cooper et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160006664 Sabato et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160012002 Arimilli et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160028613 Haramaty et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160065455 Wang et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160094450 Ghanwani et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160134518 Callon et al. May 2016 A1
20160134535 Callon May 2016 A1
20160134559 Abel et al. May 2016 A1
20160134573 Gagliardi et al. May 2016 A1
20160142318 Beecroft May 2016 A1
20160154756 Dodson et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160182383 Pedersen Jun 2016 A1
20160205023 Janardhanan Jul 2016 A1
20160226797 Aravinthan et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160254991 Eckert et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160259394 Ragavan Sep 2016 A1
20160283422 Crupnicoff et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160285545 Schmidtke et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160285677 Kashyap et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160294694 Parker et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160294926 Zur et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160301610 Amit et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160344620 G. Santos et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160381189 Caulfield et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170024263 Verplanken Jan 2017 A1
20170039063 Gopal et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170041239 Goldenberg et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170048144 Liu Feb 2017 A1
20170054633 Underwood et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170063619 Hama Mar 2017 A1
20170091108 Arellano et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170093770 Flajslik Mar 2017 A1
20170097840 Bridgers Apr 2017 A1
20170103108 Datta et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170118090 Pettit et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170118098 Littlejohn et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170153852 Ma et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170177541 Berman et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170220500 Tong Aug 2017 A1
20170237654 Turner et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170237671 Rimmer et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170242753 Sherlock et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170250914 Caulfield et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170251394 Johansson et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170270051 Chen et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170272331 Lissack Sep 2017 A1
20170272370 Ganga et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170286316 Doshi et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170289066 Haramaty et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170295098 Watkins et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170324664 Xu et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170371778 McKelvie et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180004705 Menachem et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180019948 Patwardhan et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180026878 Zahavi et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180077064 Wang Mar 2018 A1
20180083868 Cheng Mar 2018 A1
20180097645 Rajagopalan et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180097912 Chumbalkar et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180113618 Chan et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180115469 Erickson et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180131602 Civanlar et al. May 2018 A1
20180131678 Agarwal et al. May 2018 A1
20180150374 Ratcliff May 2018 A1
20180152317 Chang et al. May 2018 A1
20180152357 Natham et al. May 2018 A1
20180173557 Nakil et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180183724 Callard et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180191609 Caulfield et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180191742 Dawes Jul 2018 A1
20180198736 Labonte et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180212876 Bacthu et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180212902 Steinmacher-Burow Jul 2018 A1
20180219804 Graham et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180225238 Karguth et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180234343 Zdornov et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180254945 Bogdanski et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180260324 Marathe et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180278540 Shalev et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180287928 Levi et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180323898 Dods Nov 2018 A1
20180335974 Simionescu et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180341494 Sood et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190007349 Wang et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190018808 Beard et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190036771 Sharpless et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190042337 Dinan et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190042518 Marolia Feb 2019 A1
20190044809 Willis et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190044827 Ganapathi et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190044863 Mula et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190044872 Ganapathi et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190044875 Murty et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190052327 Motozuka et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190058663 Song Feb 2019 A1
20190068501 Schneider et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190081903 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190095134 Li Mar 2019 A1
20190104057 Goel et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190104206 Goel et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190108106 Aggarwal et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190108332 Glew et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190109791 Mehra et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190121781 Kasichainula Apr 2019 A1
20190140979 Levi et al. May 2019 A1
20190146477 Cella et al. May 2019 A1
20190171612 Shahar et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190196982 Rozas et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190199646 Singh et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190253354 Caulfield et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190280978 Schmatz et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190294575 Dennison et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190306134 Shanbhogue et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190332314 Zhang et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190334624 Bernard Oct 2019 A1
20190356611 Das et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190361728 Kumar et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190370214 Vidyadhara Dec 2019 A1
20190379610 Srinivasan et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200036644 Belogolovy et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200084150 Burstein et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200145725 Eberle et al. May 2020 A1
20200177505 Li Jun 2020 A1
20200177521 Blumrich et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200259755 Wang et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200272579 Humphrey et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200274832 Humphrey et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200334195 Chen et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200349098 Caulfield et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210081410 Chavan et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210152494 Johnsen et al. May 2021 A1
20210263779 Haghighat et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210334206 Colgrove et al. Oct 2021 A1
20210377156 Michael et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210409351 Das et al. Dec 2021 A1
20220131768 Ganapathi et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220166705 Froese May 2022 A1
20220200900 Roweth Jun 2022 A1
20220210058 Bataineh et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220217078 Ford et al. Jul 2022 A1
20220217101 Yefet et al. Jul 2022 A1
20220245072 Roweth et al. Aug 2022 A1
20220278941 Shalev et al. Sep 2022 A1
20220309025 Chen et al. Sep 2022 A1
20230035420 Sankaran et al. Feb 2023 A1
20230046221 Pismenny et al. Feb 2023 A1
20230208748 Goel Jun 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
101729609 Jun 2010 CN
102932203 Feb 2013 CN
110324249 Oct 2019 CN
110601888 Dec 2019 CN
0275135 Jul 1988 EP
2187576 May 2010 EP
2219329 Aug 2010 EP
2947832 Nov 2015 EP
3445006 Feb 2019 EP
2003-244196 Aug 2003 JP
3459653 Oct 2003 JP
10-2012-0062864 Jun 2012 KR
10-2012-0082739 Jul 2012 KR
10-2014-0100529 Aug 2014 KR
10-2015-0026939 Mar 2015 KR
10-2015-0104056 Sep 2015 KR
10-2017-0110106 Oct 2017 KR
10-1850749 Apr 2018 KR
2001069851 Sep 2001 WO
0247329 Jun 2002 WO
2003019861 Mar 2003 WO
2004001615 Dec 2003 WO
2005094487 Oct 2005 WO
2007034184 Mar 2007 WO
2009010461 Jan 2009 WO
2009018232 Feb 2009 WO
2014092780 Jun 2014 WO
2014137382 Sep 2014 WO
2014141005 Sep 2014 WO
2018004977 Jan 2018 WO
2018046703 Mar 2018 WO
2019072072 Apr 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (74)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US20/24340, dated Oct. 26, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US20/24342, dated Oct. 27, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/024192, dated Oct. 23, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/024221, dated Oct. 26, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report cited in PCT/US2020/024170 dated Dec. 16, 2020; 3 pages.
Maabi, S., et al.; “ERFAN: Efficient reconfigurable fault-tolerant deflection routing algorithm for 3-D Network-on-Chip”; Sep. 6-9, 2016.
Maglione-Mathey, G., et al.; “Scalable Deadlock-Free Deterministic Minimal-Path Routing Engine for InfiniBand-Based Dragonfly Networks”; Aug. 21, 2017; 15 pages.
Mamidala, A.R., et al.; “Efficient Barrier and Allreduce on Infiniband clusters using multicast and adaptive algorithms”; Sep. 20-23, 2004; 10 pages.
Mammeri, Z; “Reinforcement Learning Based Routing in Networks: Review and Classification of Approaches”; Apr. 29, 2019; 35 pages.
Mollah; M. A., et al.; “High Performance Computing Systems. Performance Modeling, Benchmarking, and Simulation: 8th International Workshop”; Nov. 13, 2017.
Open Networking Foundation; “OpenFlow Switch Specification”; Mar. 26, 2015; 283 pages.
Prakash, P., et al.; “The TCP Outcast Problem: Exposing Unfairness in Data Center Networks”; 2011; 15 pages.
Ramakrishnan, K., et al.; “The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP”; Sep. 2001; 63 pages.
Roth, P. C., et al; “MRNet: A Software-Based Multicast/Reduction Network for Scalable Tools1”; Nov. 15-21, 2003; 16 pages.
Silveira, J., et al.; “Preprocessing of Scenarios for Fast and Efficient Routing Reconfiguration in Fault-Tolerant NoCs”; Mar. 4-6, 2015.
Tsunekawa, K.; “Fair bandwidth allocation among LSPs for AF class accommodating TCP and UDP traffic in a Diffserv-capable MPLS network”; Nov. 17, 2005; 9 pages.
Underwood, K.D., et al.; “A hardware acceleration unit for MPI queue processing”; Apr. 18, 2005; 10 pages.
Wu, J.; “Fault-tolerant adaptive and minimal routing in mesh-connected multicomputers using extended safety levels”; Feb. 2000; 11 pages.
Xiang, D., et al.; “Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Routing in Dragonfly Networks”; Apr. 12, 2017; 15 pages.
Xiang, D., et al; “Deadlock-Free Broadcast Routing in Dragonfly Networks without Virtual Channels”, submission to IEEE transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2015, 15 pages.
Awerbuch, B., et al.; “An On-Demand Secure Routing Protocol Resilient to Byzantine Failures”; Sep. 2002; 10 pages.
Belayneh L.W., et al.; “Method and Apparatus for Routing Data in an Inter-Nodal Communications Lattice of a Massively Parallel Computer System by Semi-Randomly Varying Routing Policies for Different Packets”; 2019; 3 pages.
Bhatele, A., et al.; “Analyzing Network Health and Congestion in Dragonfly-based Supercomputers”; May 23-27, 2016; 10 pages.
Blumrich, M.A., et al.; “Exploiting Idle Resources in a High-Radix Switch for Supplemental Storage”; Nov. 2018; 13 pages.
Chang, F., et al.; “PVW: Designing Vir PVW: Designing Virtual World Ser orld Server Infr er Infrastructur astructure”; 2010; 8 pages.
Chang, F., et al.; “PVW: Designing Virtual World Server Infrastructure”; 2010; 8 pages.
Chen, F., et al. .; “Requirements for RoCEv3 Congestion Management”; Mar. 21, 2019; 8 pages.
Cisco Packet Tracer; “packet-tracer;—ping”; https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa-command-reference/l-R/cmdref2/p1.html; 2017.
Cisco; “Understanding Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (802.1w)”; Aug. 1, 2017; 13 pages.
Eardley, EE, P; “Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture”; Jun. 2009; 54 pages.
Escudero-Sahuquillo, J., et al.; “Combining Congested-Flow Isolation and Injection Throttling in HPC Interconnection Networks”; Sep. 13-16, 2011; 3 pages.
Hong, Y.; “Mitigating the Cost, Performance, and Power Overheads Induced by Load Variations in Multicore Cloud Servers”; Fall 2013; 132 pages.
Huawei; “The Lossless Network for Data Centers”; Nov. 7, 2017; 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024248, dated Jul. 8, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/024332, dated Jul. 8, 2020, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24243, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24253, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24256, dated Jul. 7, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24257, dated Jul. 7, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24258, dated Jul. 7, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24259, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24260, dated Jul. 7, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24268, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24269, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US20/24339, dated Jul. 8, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024125, dated Jul. 10, 2020, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024129, dated Jul. 10, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024237, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024239, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024242, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024244, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024245, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024246, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024250, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024254, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024262, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024266, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024270, dated Jul. 10, 2020, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024271, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024272, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024276, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024304, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024311, dated Jul. 17, 2020, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024321, dated Jul. 9, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024324, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024327, dated Jul. 10, 2020, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/24158, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/24251, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/24267, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US20/24303, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 9 pages.
Ramakrishnan et al., RFC 3168, “The addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP”, Sep. 2001 (Year: 2001).
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion received for EP Application No. 20809930.9, dated Mar. 2, 2023, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion received for EP Application No. 20810784.7, dated Mar. 9, 2023, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/024241, dated Jul. 14, 2020, 13 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220231965 A1 Jul 2022 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
62852273 May 2019 US
62852289 May 2019 US
62852203 May 2019 US