System and method for manufacturing photovoltaic structures with a metal seed layer

Abstract
One embodiment of the present invention can provide a system for fabrication of a photovoltaic structure. The system can include a physical vapor deposition tool configured to sequentially deposit a transparent conductive oxide layer and a metallic layer on an emitter layer formed in a first surface of a Si substrate, without requiring the Si substrate to be removed from the physical vapor deposition tool after depositing the transparent conductive oxide layer. The system can further include an electroplating tool configured to plate a metallic grid on the metallic layer and a thermal annealing tool configured to anneal the transparent conductive oxide layer.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO OTHER APPLICATION

This is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/220,532, entitled “SOLAR CELL WITH ELECTROPLATED METAL GRID,” filed Aug. 29, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This generally relates to the fabrication of photovoltaic structures. More specifically, this is related to the fabrication of photovoltaic structures having a metal seed layer.


DEFINITIONS

“Solar cell” or “cell” is a photovoltaic structure capable of converting light into electricity. A cell may have any size and any shape, and may be created from a variety of materials. For example, a solar cell may be a photovoltaic structure fabricated on a silicon wafer or one or more thin films on a substrate material (e.g., glass, plastic, or any other material capable of supporting the photovoltaic structure), or a combination thereof.


A “solar cell strip,” “photovoltaic strip,” or “strip” is a portion or segment of a photovoltaic structure, such as a solar cell. A photovoltaic structure may be divided into a number of strips. A strip may have any shape and any size. The width and length of a strip may be the same or different from each other. Strips may be formed by further dividing a previously divided strip.


“Finger lines,” “finger electrodes,” and “fingers” refer to elongated, electrically conductive (e.g., metallic) electrodes of a photovoltaic structure for collecting carriers.


A “busbar,” “bus line,” or “bus electrode” refers to an elongated, electrically conductive (e.g., metallic) electrode of a photovoltaic structure for aggregating current collected by two or more finger lines. A busbar is usually wider than a finger line, and can be deposited or otherwise positioned anywhere on or within the photovoltaic structure. A single photovoltaic structure may have one or more busbars.


A “photovoltaic structure” can refer to a solar cell, a segment, or solar cell strip. A photovoltaic structure is not limited to a device fabricated by a particular method. For example, a photovoltaic structure can be a crystalline silicon-based solar cell, a thin film solar cell, an amorphous silicon-based solar cell, a polycrystalline silicon-based solar cell, or a strip thereof.


BACKGROUND

Most of the current solar cell manufacturing facilities, however, are insufficiently equipped and/or not optimized for large-scale production. The emerging solar market demands factories that can produce hundreds of megawatts, if not gigawatts, of solar cells per year. The design, size, and throughput of present facilities are not intended for such high-volume manufacturing. Hence, various new designs in the manufacturing process are needed.


SUMMARY

One embodiment of the present invention can provide a system for fabrication of a photovoltaic structure. The system can include a physical vapor deposition tool configured to sequentially deposit a transparent conductive oxide layer and a metallic layer on an emitter layer formed on a first surface of a Si substrate, without requiring the Si substrate to be removed from the physical vapor deposition tool after depositing the transparent conductive oxide layer. The system can further include an electroplating tool configured to plate a metallic grid on the metallic layer and a thermal annealing tool configured to anneal the transparent conductive oxide layer.


In a variation of this embodiment, the thermal annealing tool can be configured to subject the photovoltaic structure to a temperature ranging from 150° C. to 400° C.


In a further variation, the thermal annealing tool can be configured to subject the photovoltaic structure to the temperature for a time period ranging from 5 seconds to 5 minutes.


In a further variation, the thermal annealing tool can be configured to anneal the transparent conducing oxide layer in air, vacuum, forming gas, or inert gases.


In a variation of this embodiment, the electroplating tool can be configured to plate a metallic grid before the thermal annealing tool annealing the transparent conductive oxide layer, and the thermal annealing tool can be configured to simultaneously anneal the plated metallic grid and the transparent conductive oxide layer.


In a variation of this embodiment, the physical vapor deposition tool can be further configured to sequentially deposit a second transparent conductive oxide layer and a second metallic layer on a surface-field layer formed on a second surface of the Si substrate, without requiring the Si substrate to be removed from the physical vapor deposition tool after depositing the second transparent conductive oxide layer. The electroplating tool can be further configured to deposit a second metallic grid on the second metallic seed layer.


In a variation of this embodiment, the physical vapor deposition tool can be configured to perform sputtering, evaporation, or both.


In a variation of this embodiment, the metallic thin layer can include: Cu, Ni, Ag, Ti, Ta, W, TiN, TaN, WN, TiW, NiCr, or any combination thereof.


In a variation of this embodiment, the transparent conductive oxide layer can include: indium-tin-oxide (ITO), aluminum-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Al), gallium-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Ga), tungsten-doped indium oxide (IWO), Zn—in—Sn—O (ZITO), or any combination thereof.


In a variation of this embodiment, the physical vapor deposition tool can be configured to deposit the transparent conductive oxide layer at a temperature lower than 100° C.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows an exemplary photovoltaic structure, according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows an exemplary fabrication system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary fabrication process, according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 shows an exemplary fabrication system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary substrate holder, according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary fabrication system, according to an embodiment of the present invention





In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.


Overview


Embodiments of the present invention can solve the technical problem of improving the production throughput for photovoltaic structures with electroplated metallic grids. The photovoltaic structures can include a metallic seed layer formed using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process to improve adhesion between an electroplated metallic grid and a TCO layer. Typically, a conventional fabrication process involves post-deposition annealing of the TCO layer. For photovoltaic structures with a metallic seed layer on the TCO layer, the annealing is usually performed before depositing the metallic seed layer, and often involves removing the photovoltaic structures from the deposition chamber. In some embodiments of the present invention, the metallic seed layer can be deposited after the deposition of the TCO layer and before the TCO annealing. This arrangement allows the TCO layer and the metallic seed layer to be deposited in the same chamber. The consolidation of these two operations can streamline the fabrication of photovoltaic structures, which can then increase the production throughput. Subsequently, a high-temperature, rapid annealing process can be performed after the deposition of the metallic seed layer or after electrochemical plating (ECP) of the bulk metallic grid to improve the film quality of the TCO layer.


Photovoltaic Structures with Electroplated Metallic Grids


Electroplated metallic electrode grids (e.g., electroplated Cu grids) have been shown to exhibit lower resistance than conventional aluminum or screen-printed-silver-paste electrodes. Such low electrical resistance can be essential in achieving high-efficiency photovoltaic structures. In addition, electroplated copper electrodes can also tolerate micro cracks better, which may occur during a subsequent cleaving process. Such micro cracks might impair silver-paste-electrode cells. Plated-copper electrode, on the other hand, can preserve the conductivity across the cell surface even if there are micro cracks. The copper electrode's higher tolerance for micro cracks allows the use of thinner silicon wafers, which can reduce the overall fabrication cost. More details on using copper plating to form low-resistance electrodes on a photovoltaic structure are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/220,532, entitled “SOLAR CELL WITH ELECTROPLATED GRID,” filed on Aug. 29, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary photovoltaic structure, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, photovoltaic structure 100 can include base layer 102, front and back quantum tunneling barrier (QTB) layers 104 and 106, emitter layer 108, surface-field layer 110, front and back TCO layers 112 and 114, a front electrode grid that can include Cu seed layer 116 and electroplated bulk Cu layer 118, and a back electrode grid that can include Cu seed layer 120 and electroplated bulk Cu layer 122.


Base layer 102 can include various materials, such as undoped or lightly doped monocrystalline silicon and undoped or lightly doped micro-crystalline silicon. QTB layers 104 and 106 can include various dielectric materials, such as silicon oxide (SiOx), hydrogenated SiOx, silicon nitride (SiNx), hydrogenated SiNx, aluminum oxide (AlOx), silicon oxynitride (SiON), aluminum oxide (AlOx), hydrogenated SiON, and any combination thereof. In addition to dielectric material, the QTB layers may also include intrinsic (e.g., undoped) silicon in various forms, such as single crystalline Si, polycrystalline Si, amorphous Si, and any combination thereof. The QTB layers can be formed using a wet process that may involve wet or steam oxidation. Emitter layer 108 can include heavily doped wide bandgap material, such as amorphous Si (a-Si) or hydrogenated a-Si (a-Si:H). If base layer 102 is lightly doped, emitter layer 108 can have a conductive doping type opposite to that of base layer 102. Surface-field layer 110 can also include heavily doped wide bandgap material, such as a-Si or a-Si:H. The conductive doping type of surface-field layer 110 can be opposite to that of emitter layer 108. In some embodiments, emitter layer 108 and/or surface-field layer 110 can have a graded doping profile, with a lower doping concentration near the base/emitter or base/surface-field layer interface. The formation of emitter layer 108 and/or surface-field layer 110 can involve a chemical-vapor-deposition (CVD) epitaxial process, such as a plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor-deposition (PECVD) process.


Front and back TCO layers 112 and 114 can be formed using materials such as indium-tin-oxide (ITO), aluminum-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Al), gallium-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Ga), tungsten-doped indium oxide (IWO), Zn—in—Sn—O (ZITO), and their combinations. The TCO layers can be formed using a PVD process. The TCO layers can then be annealed to improve their electro-optical properties (e.g., high transparency over a wide wavelength range and low electrical resistivity). For example, if the TCO layers include ITO, the annealing can reduce its sheet resistance. Typically, the annealing process can include subjecting the photovoltaic structure to an elevated temperature for a period of time. For example, the annealing of an ITO film can involve subjecting the photovoltaic structure to 200° C. for 20 minutes or longer.


As discussed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/220,532, a thin metallic seed layer (e.g., Cu seed layer 116) can be deposited to improve the adhesion between the electroplated Cu grid and the underlying TCO layer using a PVD technique (e.g., sputtering or evaporation), on top of the TCO layer, because high-energy atoms sputtered from the target can adhere well to the TCO layer. This metallic seed layer can then enhance the adhesion between the TCO layer and the subsequently plated Cu grid.


As discussed previously, electroplated Cu grids can provide a number of advantages, such as reduced resistance and increased tolerance to micro cracks. However, the fabrication of a reliable Cu grid can involve depositing a Cu seed layer using a PVD process, which can complicate the fabrication process of photovoltaic structures with Cu grids.



FIG. 2 shows an exemplary fabrication system of photovoltaic structures, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 2, fabrication system 200 can include wet station 202, PECVD tool 204, PVD tool 206, annealing station 208, PVD tool 210, and electrochemical plating (ECP) tool 212.


During fabrication, the substrates (e.g., crystalline Si wafers) can first undergo a series of wet processes (e.g., surface cleaning and texturing, and wet oxidization) at wet station 202, and then be loaded into PECVD tool 204 for the deposition of the emitter and/or surface-field layers. Subsequently, they can be loaded into PVD tool 206 for the deposition of the front and/or back side TCO layer(s). In this approach, the TCO annealing typically occurs right after the TCO deposition, which often requires taking the photovoltaic structures out of the PVD chamber. This is because the PVD process and the TCO annealing process may require different temperatures. For example, radio-frequency (RF) sputtering of an ITO film can be performed at room temperature (e.g., between 20 and 25° C.), whereas typical annealing of the ITO film may require a temperature of at least 150° C. In a production line, it might not be efficient to adjust the temperature setting of a processing tool between batches, because it can take a long time for the ambient temperature inside the processing tool to reach the desired setting. Hence, after the deposition of the TCO layer(s), the photovoltaic structures can be removed from PVD tool 206 and transferred to annealing station 208. After the TCO layer(s) are annealed, the photovoltaic structures can be sent to PVD tool 210, which can be different from PVD tool 206, for the deposition of the metallic seed layer. It is also possible to send the photovoltaic structures back to PVD tool 206 for metal deposition. This approach, however, will increase the product's wait time or the equipment's idle time. Subsequent to the deposition of the metallic seed layer, the photovoltaic structures can be transferred to ECP station 212 for Cu plating. ECP station 212 can include a large electrolyte bath and a moving cathode. Photovoltaic structures attached to the moving cathode can be plated with metal as they move through the electrolyte bath.


Large-scale fabrication may need each processing tool to process tens, sometimes even hundreds, of wafers during each processing cycle. Various deposition tools, such as PECVD tool and PVD tool, can be expensive and have large footprints. The fabrication system shown in FIG. 2 can often include two separate PVD tools for the deposition of the TCO layer and the metallic seed layer. Such a system can be costly and have a large footprint. Moreover, loading and unloading the photovoltaic structures in and out of multiple processing tools can be time-consuming and can lead to wafer damage, thus reducing the overall system throughput.


To solve such a problem, in some embodiments, annealing of the TCO layer can be performed after the deposition of the metallic seed layer or ECP of the metallic grids. The two PVD processes can be performed back-to-back, making it possible to use a single PVD tool to deposit both the TCO layer(s) and the metallic seed layers.



FIG. 3 shows an exemplary fabrication process, according to an embodiment of the present invention. During fabrication, a plurality of substrates can be obtained (operation 302). The substrates can include crystalline silicon (e.g., monocrystalline silicon or polycrystalline silicon) wafers and can be optionally texturized. The substrates can also be cleaned. In addition, saw damages can be removed via wet etching. The substrates can then be oxidized (e.g., steam or wet oxidation) to form the front and/or back QTB layers (operation 304).


After the wet processes, the substrates can be dried and sent to the PECVD tool for deposition of the emitter layer and surface-field layer (operation 306). For large-scale, high-throughput fabrication, the PECVD tool may simultaneously deposit material onto a large number of substrates at a time. In some embodiments, a wafer carrier that can carry over 100 Si wafers (e.g., 5-inch or 6-inch square or pseudo-square Si wafers) can be used inside the PECVD tool to allow simultaneous material deposition. The wafer carrier can be a graphite or carbon fiber composite (CFC) carrier coated with a low-porosity material, such as pyrolytic carbon or silicon carbide. The wafer carrier may also include a non-flat surface or a partially carved-out structure at the bottom of the wafer-holding pockets. After deposition of the emitter layer, the wafers may be turned over for deposition of a surface-field layer. Alternatively, the deposition sequence may change so that the surface-field layer can be deposited first.


After the PECVD operation(s), the multilayer structures can be sent to a PVD tool for deposition of front and/or back TCO layers (e.g., ITO films) (operation 308). The back TCO layer can facilitate the bifacial operation of the photovoltaic structures. Alternatively, only the front (e.g., the side that faces incident light) TCO layer might be needed.


In some embodiments, the PVD tool can include a sputtering machine, such as a radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering machine. In further embodiments, the RF magnetron sputtering machine can include one or more rotary targets coupled to a periodically tuned capacitor. This arrangement can ensure a uniform etching profile of the targets, which can reduce cost and time for maintenance. A detailed description of the rotary targets can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/142,605, entitled “Radio-Frequency Sputtering System with Rotary Target for Fabricating Solar Cells,” filed Dec. 27, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In some embodiments, deposition of the front and/or back TCO layers can be performed under a relatively low temperature (e.g., at room temperature or at a temperature lower than 100° C.) in order to improve the open circuit voltage (Voc) of the photovoltaic structures. For example, low-temperature PVD can increase the Voc of double-sided heterojunction photovoltaic structures from 710 mV to 720 mV. In addition to improved Voc, room temperature PVD can also improve the system throughput, because there is no longer a need to raise the temperature of the PVD tool. TCO films (e.g., ITO films) formed using low-temperature PVD can be in an amorphous structure state. Annealing can crystallize the amorphous TCO to reduce resistivity and improve transparency.


After PVD of the front and/or back TCO layers, the multilayer structures can remain in the same PVD tool for deposition of the metallic seed layers (e.g., Cu seed layers) on the front and back side of the multilayer structures (operation 310). To do so, in some embodiments, the sputtering tool can include multiple targets (e.g., an ITO target and one or more metallic targets) to enable sequential deposition of multiple layers of thin films. For example, the sputtering tool can sequentially deposit an ITO layer and a Cu seed layer. Moreover, the sputtering tool may also deposit one or more metallic adhesive layers between the ITO layer and seed layer. These adhesive layers can improve the adhesion between any subsequently deposited metallic layer and the ITO layer. The metallic seed layers typically can include the same metallic material as the subsequently plated metallic grids, whereas the metallic adhesive layers can include Cu, Ni, Ag, Ti, Ta, W, TiN, TaN, WN, TiW, NiCr, and their combinations. In some embodiments, the multiple targets can be electrically insulated from each other, and can be sequentially biased to allow one active target at a time. Alternatively, the PVD tool can include a rotational shutter to expose only one target to the deposition surface at a time. Other types of sputtering tool (e.g., a sputtering tool with multiple chambers) can also be possible, as long as they allow sequential deposition of multiple layers. In some embodiments, the sputtering tool can be configured to deposit thin films of different materials without breaking the vacuum. For example, the sputtering tool can first deposit a thin layer of ITO and then deposit a thin layer of Cu under the same vacuum, thus significantly reducing the processing time.


In some embodiments, subsequent to PVD deposition of the multiple layers (e.g., a TCO layer and a metallic seed layer), the multilayer structures can be taken out of the PVD tool and sent to the ECP station for the plating of the front and back side metallic grids (operation 312). The photolithography process that defines the grid pattern can be a standard process and is not shown in the flowchart. ECP of the metallic grids can include electroplating of a Cu grid on both the front and back sides of the multilayer structures.


After ECP, the multilayer structures with metallic grids can be sent to the annealing station for annealing of the TCO layers and/or ECP metallic grids (operation 314). As discussed previously, annealing is important to TCO because it can improve the optical and electrical properties of the TCO material. However, because the multilayer structures now include metallic grids with thin lines (e.g., front and back Cu grids with thin Cu finger lines), the conventional annealing process may not be suitable. For example, a typical TCO annealing process may involve subjecting the TCO-coated multilayer structures to a temperature of 200° C. for 20 minutes or longer. Exposing the metallic grids to a high temperature for a prolonged period may weaken the thin metal lines, especially the bonding between the thin metal lines and the underlying structure. To prevent peeling-off of the thin metal lines, in some embodiments, the annealing of the TCO can include a high-temperature, rapid annealing process. More specifically, the annealing temperature can be between 150° C. and 400° C., and the time duration can be between a few seconds (e.g., 5 seconds) and a few minutes (e.g., 5 minutes). Because the metallic grids are only exposed to the high temperature environment for a short time period, minimal or no damage can occur. Additional advantages provided by the high-temperature, rapid annealing process can also include reduced fabrication time, and thus increased production throughput. In some embodiments, the annealing can be performed in air on hot plates. In alternative embodiments, the annealing can be performed in a vacuum chamber, or in a chamber filled with a forming gas (N2/H2), one or more inert gases (e.g., Ar2), or a combination thereof.


As discussed before, high-temperature, rapid annealing can re-crystallize the amorphous TCO, which not only improves transparency but also reduces the resistivity of the TCO material. Consequently, the annealing and the low-temperature PVD of TCO layers can improve overall efficiency of photovoltaic structures by about 1-2%.


In addition to the TCO, the subsequently formed metallic layers (e.g., the metallic seed layer and the ECP Cu layer) can also be annealed. Annealing the Cu grid after the ECP can increase the reliability and reduce resistivity of the grid. In some embodiments, the same high-temperature, rapid annealing process used for annealing of the TCO layer can also anneal the electroplated Cu grid. As a result, both the TCO layers and the Cu grids are annealed at the same time.



FIG. 4 shows an exemplary fabrication system, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 4, fabrication system 400 can include wet station 402, PECVD tool 404, PVD tool 406, ECP station 408, and annealing station 410. Wet station 402 and PECVD tool 404 can be similar to wet station 202 and PECVD tool 204 shown in FIG. 2, respectively. Both wet station 402 and PECVD tool 404 can process Si substrate in batches, with each batch including tens or hundreds of Si substrates. In some embodiments, wet station 402 can be configured to form the front and back QTB layers simultaneously using a wet oxidation technique on the Si substrates. Multilayer structures emerging from PECVD tool 404 can include an emitter layer on one side and a surface-field layer on the other side.


PVD tool 406 can be configured to sequentially deposit a thin layer of TCO and one or more metallic layers on one or both sides of the multilayer structures. In some embodiments, PVD tool 406 can include a multiple-target sputtering tool (e.g., an RF magnetron sputtering tool). The multiple targets inside the deposition chamber can include an ITO target and one or more metallic targets. In some embodiments, the targets can include rotary targets coupled to periodically tuned capacitors. Because the multiple layers (e.g., a TCO layer and one or more metallic layers) can be deposited sequentially without needing to break the vacuum, the PVD process consumes significantly less time than multiple separate PVD processes. In some embodiments, the substrate holder inside PVD tool 406 can be vertically oriented, as shown in FIG. 5, to expose both sides of the substrate to the sputtered ions to allow simultaneous material deposition. For example, the front and back TCO layers can be simultaneously deposited onto the emitter and surface-field layers, and the front and back metallic seed layers can be simultaneously deposited onto the front and back TCO layers. Alternatively, substrates can be placed in a carrier that is oriented substantially horizontally during deposition. However, this might require that the substrates be turned over to allow deposition on the other side.



FIG. 5 shows an exemplary substrate holder, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 5, substrate holder 500 for PVD can include a number of openings (e.g., openings 502 and 504), which can be arranged in an array. Each opening can accommodate a Si-based substrate. For example, opening 502 can accommodate Si-based substrate 506. Depending on the system, the openings can be configured to accommodate Si-based substrates of various sizes and shapes, including but not limited to: 5-inch by 5-inch square, 6-inch by 6-inch square, 5-inch by 5-inch pseudo-square, and 6-inch by 6-inch pseudo-square. Each substrate can be held in place by multiple clips, such as clips 508 and 510. During a PVD process, one or more substrate holders can be placed inside the PVD chamber vertically to allow simultaneous material deposition on both sides of the Si-based substrates. In some embodiments, a thin layer of ITO and a thin layer of Cu can be sequentially deposited on both sides of the Si-based substrates.


Now returning to FIG. 4, ECP station 408 can be similar to ECP station 212 shown in FIG. 2. More specifically, the wafer-holding jigs can carry the photovoltaic structures in such a way that both the front and back sides of the photovoltaic structures are exposed to the electrolyte solution. Therefore, metallic ions (e.g., Cu ions) can be deposited on both sides of the photovoltaic structures as the wafer-holding jigs moving through the electrolyte bath. In other words, the front and back metallic grids can be formed simultaneously. Photovoltaic structures emerging from ECP station 408 can be cleaned, dried, and sent to annealing station 410 for a high-temperature, rapid annealing. Annealing station 410 can take on various forms. In some embodiments, annealing station 410 can include hot plates, which can be placed in air or in a vacuum. In some embodiments, annealing station 410 can include an oven, which can be filled with various ambient gases, such as air, a forming gas, one or more inert gases (e.g., Ar2), or any combinations thereof. The annealing temperature can range from 150° C. to 400° C., and the annealing time can range from a few seconds to a few minutes (e.g., from 5 seconds to 5 minutes). If the annealing temperature is set high, the annealing time can be set relatively short.


Compared with the fabrication system shown in FIG. 2, fabrication system 400 provides a number of advantages. The most obvious advantage is that system 400 can include fewer components than system 200. Novel fabrication system 400 can include a single PVD tool configured to deposit multiple layers of different materials. Fewer tools means lower equipment cost, smaller factory spaces, and hence reduced capital expenditures. In addition, the novel fabrication system can also provide a more streamlined fabrication process. There is no longer a need to unload the photovoltaic structures from one PVD tool and load them into another PVD tool, or to wait for the deposition chambers to be pumped down after the loading/unloading. Consequently, the production time of one batch of photovoltaic structures can be significantly reduced. The batch production time can be further reduced by the shorter time needed for annealing.


This novel fabrication system can also provide additional advantages. More specifically, the low-temperature PVD of the TCO layers can improve the Voc of the fabricated photovoltaic structures, and the high-temperature rapid annealing can improve the TCO film property (e.g., transparency and resistivity) and reliability of the metallic grid. Overall, this novel fabrication system can produce, with high throughput, photovoltaic structures that have a higher Voc, higher TCO transparency, lower TCO resistivity, lower grid resistivity, and better grid reliability.


In the example shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, the TCO annealing is performed after the ECP process of the metallic grid. In practice, it is also possible to have the TCO annealed before the ECP process. FIG. 6 shows an exemplary fabrication system, according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 6, fabrication system 600 can include wet station 602, PECVD tool 604, PVD tool 606, annealing station 608, and ECP station 610. Functions and settings of the various components of fabrication system 600 can be similar to those of fabrication system 400, with the exception of annealing station 608. For example, wet station 602 can be similar to wet station 402, PECVD tool 604 can be similar to PECVD tool 404, PVD tool 606 can be similar to PVD tool 406, and ECP station 610 can be similar to ECP tool 408.


Unlike the annealing station shown in FIG. 4, in FIG. 6, annealing station 608 can be positioned between PVD tool 606 and ECP station 610 to allow photovoltaic structures emerging from PVD tool 606 to be annealed before the ECP process. In some embodiments, after depositions of both the TCO layer and the Cu seed layer, the photovoltaic structures can be sent directly to anneal station 608, which can be a separate tool. In alternative embodiments, annealing station 608 can be incorporated into PVD tool 606 to allow in-situ annealing. The annealing process can be performed at a lower temperature and for a longer duration due to the absence of the Cu grid at the moment.


Allowing in-situ annealing of the TCO layer can simplify the fabrication system because a separate annealing tool may no longer be needed. A simplified system can lead to reduced cost. However, annealing the TCO prior to the formation of the Cu grids also means that the Cu grids will not be annealed by the same process. Additional annealing may be needed in order to anneal the Cu grids.


In general, embodiments of the present can invention provide a solution to a technical problem that is unique to photovoltaic structures with electroplated metallic grids. More specifically, the relative weak bonding between the electroplated metallic grid and the underlying TCO layer may require a metallic seed layer be deposited on the TCO layer using a PVD technique. This additional PVD operation can reduce the fabrication throughput. However, by allowing the TCO layer and metallic seed layer to be deposited in the same PVD chamber and by using a high temperature, rapid post-PVD annealing process, embodiments of the present invention can not only improve the optical and electrical properties of the TCO layer but also increase the fabrication throughput. The annealing of the TCO layer can be performed before or after the electroplating of the metallic grids.


The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for fabricating a photovoltaic structure, the method comprising: obtaining a Si substrate;forming an emitter layer on a first surface of the Si substrate;depositing, using a physical vapor deposition machine, a transparent conductive oxide layer on the emitter layer;depositing, without removing the Si substrate from the physical vapor deposition machine and without first annealing the deposited transparent conductive oxide layer, a metallic layer on the transparent conductive oxide layer; andannealing the transparent conductive oxide layer after depositing the metallic layer.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: before the annealing, depositing, using a plating technique, a metallic grid on the metallic layer, and wherein the annealing process simultaneously anneals the transparent conductive oxide layer and the plated metallic grid.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: forming a surface-field layer on a second surface of the Si substrate;depositing, using the physical vapor deposition machine, a second transparent conductive oxide layer on the surface-field layer;depositing, without removing the substrate from the physical vapor deposition machine, a second metallic layer on the second transparent conductive oxide layer; anddepositing, using a plating technique, a second metallic grid on the second metallic seed layer.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein depositing the transparent conductive oxide layer or the metallic layer comprises sputtering, evaporation, or both.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the metallic layer includes: Cu, Ni, Ag, Ti, Ta, W, TiN, TaN, WN, TiW, NiCr, or any combination thereof.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the transparent conductive oxide layer includes: indium-tin-oxide (ITO), aluminum-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Al), gallium-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Ga), tungsten-doped indium oxide (IWO), Zn—In—Sn—O (ZITO), or any combination thereof.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein depositing the transparent conductive oxide layer is performed at a temperature lower than 100° C.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein annealing the transparent conductive oxide layer involves subjecting the photovoltaic structure to a temperature ranging from 150° C. to 400° C.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein annealing the transparent conductive oxide layer comprises subjecting the photovoltaic structure to the temperature for a time period ranging from 5 seconds to 5 minutes.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the annealing is performed in: air;vacuum;forming gas; orinert gases.
  • 11. A system for fabrication of a photovoltaic structure, the system comprising: a physical vapor deposition tool configured to sequentially deposit a transparent conductive oxide layer and a metallic layer on an emitter layer formed on a first surface of a Si substrate, without requiring the Si substrate to be removed from the physical vapor deposition tool after depositing the transparent conductive oxide layer and without first annealing the deposited transparent conductive oxide layer;an electroplating tool configured to plate a metallic grid on the metallic layer; anda thermal annealing tool configured to anneal the transparent conductive oxide layer.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the electroplating tool is configured to plate a metallic grid before the thermal annealing tool annealing the transparent conductive oxide layer, and wherein the thermal annealing tool is configured to simultaneously anneal the plated metallic grid and the transparent conductive oxide layer.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the physical vapor deposition tool is further configured to sequentially deposit a second transparent conductive oxide layer and a second metallic layer on a surface-field layer formed on a second surface of the Si substrate, without requiring the Si substrate to be removed from the physical vapor deposition tool after depositing the second transparent conductive oxide layer; andwherein the electroplating tool is further configured to deposit a second metallic grid on the second metallic seed layer.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the physical vapor deposition tool is configured to perform sputtering, evaporation, or both.
  • 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the metallic layer includes: Cu, Ni, Ag, Ti, Ta, W, TiN, TaN, WN, TiW, NiCr, or any combination thereof.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the transparent conductive oxide layer includes: indium-tin-oxide (ITO), aluminum-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Al), gallium-doped zinc-oxide (ZnO:Ga), tungsten-doped indium oxide (IWO), Zn—in—Sn—O (ZITO), or any combination thereof.
  • 17. The system of claim 11, wherein the thermal annealing tool is configured to subject the photovoltaic structure to a temperature ranging from 150° C. to 400° C.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the thermal annealing tool is configured to subject the photovoltaic structure to the temperature for a time period ranging from 5 seconds to 5 minutes.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the thermal annealing tool is configured to anneal the transparent conductive oxide layer in: air;vacuum;forming gas; orinert gases.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the physical vapor deposition tool is configured to deposit the transparent conductive oxide layer at a temperature lower than 100° C.
US Referenced Citations (372)
Number Name Date Kind
819360 Mayer Mar 1902 A
2626907 De Jan 1953 A
2938938 Dickson May 1960 A
3094439 Mann Jun 1963 A
3116171 Nielsen Dec 1963 A
3459597 Baron Aug 1969 A
3961997 Chu Jun 1976 A
3969163 Wakefield Jul 1976 A
4015280 Matsushita Mar 1977 A
4082568 Lindmayer Apr 1978 A
4124410 Kotval Nov 1978 A
4124455 Lindmayer Nov 1978 A
4193975 Kotval Mar 1980 A
4200621 Liaw Apr 1980 A
4213798 Williams Jul 1980 A
4251285 Yoldas Feb 1981 A
4284490 Weber Aug 1981 A
4315096 Tyan Feb 1982 A
4336648 Pschunder Jun 1982 A
4342044 Ovshinsky Jul 1982 A
4431858 Gonzalez Feb 1984 A
4514579 Hanak Apr 1985 A
4540843 Gochermann Sep 1985 A
4567642 Dilts Feb 1986 A
4571448 Barnett Feb 1986 A
4577051 Hartman Mar 1986 A
4586988 Nath May 1986 A
4589191 Green May 1986 A
4612409 Hamakawa Sep 1986 A
4617421 Nath Oct 1986 A
4633033 Nath Dec 1986 A
4652693 Bar-On Mar 1987 A
4657060 Kaucic Apr 1987 A
4667060 Spitzer May 1987 A
4670096 Schwirtlich Jun 1987 A
4694115 Lillington Sep 1987 A
4753683 Ellion Jun 1988 A
4771017 Tobin Sep 1988 A
4784702 Henri Nov 1988 A
4877460 Flodl Oct 1989 A
4933061 Kulkarni Jun 1990 A
4968384 Asano Nov 1990 A
5053355 von Campe Oct 1991 A
5075763 Spitzer Dec 1991 A
5084107 Deguchi Jan 1992 A
5118361 Fraas Jun 1992 A
5131933 Floedl Jul 1992 A
5178685 Borenstein Jan 1993 A
5181968 Nath Jan 1993 A
5213628 Noguchi May 1993 A
5217539 Fraas Jun 1993 A
5279682 Wald Jan 1994 A
5286306 Menezes Feb 1994 A
5364518 Hartig Nov 1994 A
5401331 Ciszek Mar 1995 A
5455430 Noguchi Oct 1995 A
5461002 Safir Oct 1995 A
5563092 Ohmi Oct 1996 A
5576241 Sakai Nov 1996 A
5627081 Tsuo May 1997 A
5676766 Probst Oct 1997 A
5681402 Ichinose Oct 1997 A
5698451 Hanoka Dec 1997 A
5705828 Noguchi Jan 1998 A
5726065 Szlufcik Mar 1998 A
5808315 Murakami Sep 1998 A
5814195 Lehan Sep 1998 A
5903382 Tench May 1999 A
5935345 Kuznicki Aug 1999 A
6034322 Pollard Mar 2000 A
6091019 Sakata Jul 2000 A
6140570 Kariya Oct 2000 A
6232545 Samaras May 2001 B1
6303853 Fraas Oct 2001 B1
6333457 Mulligan Dec 2001 B1
6410843 Kishi Jun 2002 B1
6441297 Keller Aug 2002 B1
6468828 Glatfelter Oct 2002 B1
6488824 Hollars Dec 2002 B1
6538193 Fraas Mar 2003 B1
6552414 Horzel Apr 2003 B1
6586270 Tsuzuki Jul 2003 B2
6620645 Chandra Sep 2003 B2
6672018 Shingleton Jan 2004 B2
6683360 Dierickx Jan 2004 B1
6736948 Barrett May 2004 B2
6803513 Beernink Oct 2004 B2
6841051 Crowley Jan 2005 B2
7030413 Nakamura Apr 2006 B2
7164150 Terakawa Jan 2007 B2
7328534 Dinwoodie Feb 2008 B2
7388146 Fraas Jun 2008 B2
7399385 German Jul 2008 B2
7534632 Hu May 2009 B2
7635810 Luch Dec 2009 B2
7737357 Cousins Jun 2010 B2
7749883 Meeus Jul 2010 B2
7769887 Bhattacharyya Aug 2010 B1
7772484 Li Aug 2010 B2
7777128 Montello Aug 2010 B2
7825329 Basol Nov 2010 B2
7829781 Montello Nov 2010 B2
7829785 Basol Nov 2010 B2
7872192 Fraas Jan 2011 B1
7905995 German Mar 2011 B2
7977220 Sanjurjo Jul 2011 B2
8070925 Hoffman Dec 2011 B2
8115093 Gui Feb 2012 B2
8152536 Scherer Apr 2012 B2
8168880 Jacobs May 2012 B2
8182662 Crowley May 2012 B2
8196360 Metten Jun 2012 B2
8209920 Krause Jul 2012 B2
8222513 Luch Jul 2012 B2
8222516 Cousins Jul 2012 B2
8258050 Cho Sep 2012 B2
8343795 Luo Jan 2013 B2
8586857 Everson Nov 2013 B2
8671630 Lena Mar 2014 B2
8686283 Heng Apr 2014 B2
8815631 Cousins Aug 2014 B2
9029181 Rhodes May 2015 B2
9147788 DeGroot Sep 2015 B2
9287431 Mascarenhas Mar 2016 B2
20010008143 Sasaoka Jul 2001 A1
20020015881 Nakamura Feb 2002 A1
20020072207 Andoh Jun 2002 A1
20020086456 Cunningham Jul 2002 A1
20020176404 Girard Nov 2002 A1
20020189939 German Dec 2002 A1
20030000568 Gonsiorawski Jan 2003 A1
20030000571 Wakuda Jan 2003 A1
20030034062 Stern Feb 2003 A1
20030042516 Forbes Mar 2003 A1
20030070705 Hayden Apr 2003 A1
20030097447 Johnston May 2003 A1
20030116185 Oswald Jun 2003 A1
20030121228 Stoehr Jul 2003 A1
20030168578 Taguchi Sep 2003 A1
20030183270 Falk Oct 2003 A1
20030201007 Fraas Oct 2003 A1
20040065363 Fetzer Apr 2004 A1
20040103937 Bilyalov Jun 2004 A1
20040112426 Hagino Jun 2004 A1
20040123897 Ojima Jul 2004 A1
20040135979 Hazelton Jul 2004 A1
20040152326 Inomata Aug 2004 A1
20040185683 Nakamura Sep 2004 A1
20040200520 Mulligan Oct 2004 A1
20050009319 Abe Jan 2005 A1
20050012095 Niira Jan 2005 A1
20050022861 Rose Feb 2005 A1
20050061665 Pavani Mar 2005 A1
20050064247 Sane Mar 2005 A1
20050074954 Yamanaka Apr 2005 A1
20050109388 Murakami May 2005 A1
20050133084 Joge Jun 2005 A1
20050178662 Wurczinger Aug 2005 A1
20050189015 Rohatgi Sep 2005 A1
20050199279 Yoshimine Sep 2005 A1
20050252544 Rohatgi Nov 2005 A1
20050257823 Zwanenburg Nov 2005 A1
20060012000 Estes Jan 2006 A1
20060060238 Hacke Mar 2006 A1
20060060791 Hazelton Mar 2006 A1
20060130891 Carlson Jun 2006 A1
20060154389 Doan Jul 2006 A1
20060213548 Bachrach Sep 2006 A1
20060231803 Wang Oct 2006 A1
20060255340 Manivannan Nov 2006 A1
20060260673 Takeyama Nov 2006 A1
20060272698 Durvasula Dec 2006 A1
20060283496 Okamoto Dec 2006 A1
20060283499 Terakawa Dec 2006 A1
20070023081 Johnson Feb 2007 A1
20070023082 Manivannan Feb 2007 A1
20070108437 Tavkhelidze May 2007 A1
20070110975 Schneweis May 2007 A1
20070132034 Curello Jun 2007 A1
20070137699 Manivannan Jun 2007 A1
20070148336 Bachrach Jun 2007 A1
20070186968 Nakauchi Aug 2007 A1
20070186970 Takahashi Aug 2007 A1
20070202029 Burns Aug 2007 A1
20070235829 Levine Oct 2007 A1
20070256728 Cousins Nov 2007 A1
20070274504 Maes Nov 2007 A1
20070283996 Hachtmann Dec 2007 A1
20070283997 Hachtmann Dec 2007 A1
20080000522 Johnson Jan 2008 A1
20080041436 Lau Feb 2008 A1
20080041437 Yamaguchi Feb 2008 A1
20080047602 Krasnov Feb 2008 A1
20080047604 Korevaar Feb 2008 A1
20080053519 Pearce Mar 2008 A1
20080061293 Ribeyron Mar 2008 A1
20080092947 Lopatin Apr 2008 A1
20080121272 Besser May 2008 A1
20080121276 Lopatin May 2008 A1
20080121932 Ranade May 2008 A1
20080128013 Lopatin Jun 2008 A1
20080149161 Nishida Jun 2008 A1
20080156370 Abdallah Jul 2008 A1
20080173347 Korevaar Jul 2008 A1
20080173350 Choi Jul 2008 A1
20080196757 Yoshimine Aug 2008 A1
20080202577 Hieslmair Aug 2008 A1
20080202582 Noda Aug 2008 A1
20080216891 Harkness Sep 2008 A1
20080230122 Terakawa Sep 2008 A1
20080251114 Tanaka Oct 2008 A1
20080251117 Schubert Oct 2008 A1
20080264477 Moslehi Oct 2008 A1
20080276983 Drake Nov 2008 A1
20080283115 Fukawa Nov 2008 A1
20080302030 Stancel Dec 2008 A1
20080303503 Wolfs Dec 2008 A1
20080308145 Krasnov Dec 2008 A1
20090007965 Rohatgi Jan 2009 A1
20090056805 Barnett Mar 2009 A1
20090078318 Meyers Mar 2009 A1
20090084439 Lu Apr 2009 A1
20090101872 Young Apr 2009 A1
20090139512 Lima Jun 2009 A1
20090151783 Lu Jun 2009 A1
20090155028 Boguslavskiy Jun 2009 A1
20090160259 Naiknaware et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090188561 Aiken Jul 2009 A1
20090221111 Frolov Sep 2009 A1
20090229854 Fredenberg Sep 2009 A1
20090239331 Xu Sep 2009 A1
20090250108 Zhou Oct 2009 A1
20090255574 Yu Oct 2009 A1
20090283138 Lin Nov 2009 A1
20090283145 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090293948 Tucci Dec 2009 A1
20090308439 Adibi Dec 2009 A1
20090317934 Scherff Dec 2009 A1
20090320897 Shimomura Dec 2009 A1
20100006145 Lee Jan 2010 A1
20100015756 Weidman Jan 2010 A1
20100043863 Wudu Feb 2010 A1
20100065111 Fu Mar 2010 A1
20100068890 Stockum Mar 2010 A1
20100084009 Carlson Apr 2010 A1
20100087031 Veschetti Apr 2010 A1
20100108134 Ravi May 2010 A1
20100116325 Nikoonahad May 2010 A1
20100124619 Xu May 2010 A1
20100132774 Borden Jun 2010 A1
20100132792 Kim Jun 2010 A1
20100147364 Gonzalez Jun 2010 A1
20100154869 Oh Jun 2010 A1
20100169478 Saha Jul 2010 A1
20100175743 Gonzalez Jul 2010 A1
20100186802 Borden Jul 2010 A1
20100193014 Johnson Aug 2010 A1
20100218799 Stefani Sep 2010 A1
20100224230 Luch Sep 2010 A1
20100229914 Adriani Sep 2010 A1
20100236612 Khajehoddin Sep 2010 A1
20100240172 Rana Sep 2010 A1
20100269904 Cousins Oct 2010 A1
20100279492 Yang Nov 2010 A1
20100300506 Heng Dec 2010 A1
20100300507 Heng Dec 2010 A1
20100307592 Chang Dec 2010 A1
20100313877 Bellman Dec 2010 A1
20100326518 Juso Dec 2010 A1
20110005569 Sauar Jan 2011 A1
20110005920 Ivanov Jan 2011 A1
20110073175 Hilali Mar 2011 A1
20110088762 Singh Apr 2011 A1
20110146759 Lee Jun 2011 A1
20110146781 Laudisio Jun 2011 A1
20110156188 Tu Jun 2011 A1
20110168250 Lin Jul 2011 A1
20110168261 Welser Jul 2011 A1
20110186112 Aernouts Aug 2011 A1
20110220182 Lin Sep 2011 A1
20110245957 Porthouse Oct 2011 A1
20110259419 Hagemann Oct 2011 A1
20110272012 Heng Nov 2011 A1
20110277688 Trujillo Nov 2011 A1
20110277816 Xu Nov 2011 A1
20110277825 Fu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110284064 Engelhart Nov 2011 A1
20110297224 Miyamoto Dec 2011 A1
20110297227 Pysch Dec 2011 A1
20110308573 Jaus Dec 2011 A1
20120000502 Wiedeman Jan 2012 A1
20120012174 Wu Jan 2012 A1
20120028461 Ritchie Feb 2012 A1
20120031480 Tisler Feb 2012 A1
20120040487 Asthana Feb 2012 A1
20120073975 Ganti Mar 2012 A1
20120080083 Liang Apr 2012 A1
20120085384 Beitel Apr 2012 A1
20120122262 Kang May 2012 A1
20120125391 Pinarbasi May 2012 A1
20120145233 Syn Jun 2012 A1
20120152349 Cao Jun 2012 A1
20120167986 Meakin Jul 2012 A1
20120192932 Wu Aug 2012 A1
20120240995 Coakley Sep 2012 A1
20120248497 Zhou Oct 2012 A1
20120279443 Kornmeyer Nov 2012 A1
20120279548 Munch Nov 2012 A1
20120285517 Souza Nov 2012 A1
20120305060 Fu Dec 2012 A1
20120318319 Pinarbasi Dec 2012 A1
20120318340 Heng Dec 2012 A1
20120325282 Snow Dec 2012 A1
20130000705 Shappir Jan 2013 A1
20130014802 Zimmerman Jan 2013 A1
20130056051 Jin Mar 2013 A1
20130096710 Pinarbasi Apr 2013 A1
20130112239 Liptac May 2013 A1
20130130430 Moslehi May 2013 A1
20130139878 Bhatnagar Jun 2013 A1
20130152996 DeGroot Jun 2013 A1
20130160826 Beckerman Jun 2013 A1
20130174897 You Jul 2013 A1
20130206213 He Aug 2013 A1
20130206221 Gannon Aug 2013 A1
20130213469 Kramer Aug 2013 A1
20130220401 Scheulov Aug 2013 A1
20130228221 Moslehi Sep 2013 A1
20130247955 Baba Sep 2013 A1
20130269771 Cheun Oct 2013 A1
20130291743 Endo Nov 2013 A1
20140000682 Zhao Jan 2014 A1
20140053899 Haag Feb 2014 A1
20140066265 Oliver Mar 2014 A1
20140102524 Xie Apr 2014 A1
20140124013 Morad May 2014 A1
20140124014 Morad May 2014 A1
20140154836 Kim Jun 2014 A1
20140196768 Heng Jul 2014 A1
20140242746 Albadri Aug 2014 A1
20140318611 Moslehi Oct 2014 A1
20140345674 Yang Nov 2014 A1
20150007879 Kwon Jan 2015 A1
20150020877 Moslehi Jan 2015 A1
20150075599 Yu Mar 2015 A1
20150090314 Yang Apr 2015 A1
20150096613 Tjahjono Apr 2015 A1
20150114444 Lentine Apr 2015 A1
20150171230 Kapur Jun 2015 A1
20150214409 Pfeiffer Jul 2015 A1
20150270410 Heng Sep 2015 A1
20150280641 Garg Oct 2015 A1
20150349145 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349153 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349161 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349162 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349167 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349168 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349169 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349170 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349171 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349172 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349173 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349174 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349175 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349176 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349190 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349193 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349701 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349702 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349703 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20160190354 Agrawal Jun 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (71)
Number Date Country
101553933 Oct 2009 CN
100580957 Jan 2010 CN
102263157 Nov 2011 CN
104409402 Mar 2015 CN
4030713 Apr 1992 DE
102006009194 Aug 2007 DE
202007002897 Aug 2008 DE
102010061317 Jun 2012 DE
10201201051 Nov 2013 DE
102012010151 Nov 2013 DE
1770791 Apr 2007 EP
1816684 Aug 2007 EP
2071635 Jun 2009 EP
2113946 Nov 2009 EP
2362430 Aug 2011 EP
2385561 Nov 2011 EP
2479796 Jul 2012 EP
2626907 Aug 2013 EP
2479796 Jul 2015 EP
2626907 Aug 2015 EP
H04245683 Sep 1992 JP
H07249788 Sep 1995 JP
10004204 Jan 1998 JP
H1131834 Feb 1999 JP
2000164902 Jun 2000 JP
2002057357 Feb 2002 JP
2005159312 Jun 2005 JP
2006324504 Nov 2006 JP
2008135655 Jun 2008 JP
2009054748 Mar 2009 JP
2009177225 Aug 2009 JP
2013526045 Jun 2013 JP
2013161855 Aug 2013 JP
2013536512 Sep 2013 JP
2013537000 Sep 2013 JP
2013219378 Oct 2013 JP
2013233553 Nov 2013 JP
2013239694 Nov 2013 JP
2013247231 Dec 2013 JP
20050122721 Dec 2005 KR
20060003277 Jan 2006 KR
20090011519 Feb 2009 KR
9117839 Nov 1991 WO
9120097 Dec 1991 WO
03083953 Oct 2003 WO
2006097189 Sep 2006 WO
2008089657 Jul 2008 WO
2009094578 Jul 2009 WO
2009150654 Dec 2009 WO
2009150654 Dec 2009 WO
2010070015 Jun 2010 WO
2010075606 Jul 2010 WO
2010075606 Jul 2010 WO
2010085949 Aug 2010 WO
2010104726 Sep 2010 WO
2010123974 Oct 2010 WO
2010123974 Oct 2010 WO
2011005447 Jan 2011 WO
2011005447 Jan 2011 WO
2011008881 Jan 2011 WO
2011008881 Jan 2011 WO
2011053006 May 2011 WO
2011123646 Oct 2011 WO
2013020590 Feb 2013 WO
2013020590 Feb 2013 WO
2013046351 Apr 2013 WO
2014074826 May 2014 WO
2014110520 Jul 2014 WO
2014117138 Jul 2014 WO
2015183827 Dec 2015 WO
2016090332 Jun 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
WP Leroy et al., “In Search for the Limits of Rotating Cylindrical Magnetron Sputtering”, Magnetron, ION Processing and ARC Technologies European Conference, Jun. 18, 2010, pp. 1-32.
Beaucarne G et al: ‘Epitaxial thin-film Si solar cells’ Thin Solid Films, Elsevier-Sequoia S.A. Lausanne, CH LNKD- DOI:10.1016/J.TSF.2005.12.003, vol. 511-512, Jul. 26, 2006 (Jul. 26, 2006), pp. 533-542, XP025007243 ISSN: 0040-6090 [retrieved on Jul. 26, 2006].
Chabal, Yves J. et al., ‘Silicon Surface and Interface Issues for Nanoelectronics,’ The Electrochemical Society Interface, Spring 2005, pp. 31-33.
Collins English Dictionary (Convex. (2000). In Collins English Dictionary. http://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/hcengdict/convex/0 on Oct. 18, 2014).
Cui, ‘Chapter 7 Dopant diffusion’, publically available as early as Nov. 4, 2010 at <https://web.archive.org/web/20101104143332/http://ece.uwaterloo.ca/˜bcui/content/NE/%20343/Chapter/%207%20Dopant%20 diffusion%20—%20I.pptx> and converted to PDF.
Davies, P.C.W., ‘Quantum tunneling time,’ Am. J. Phys. 73, Jan. 2005, pp. 23-27.
Dosaj V D et al: ‘Single Crystal Silicon Ingot Pulled From Chemically-Upgraded Metallurgical-Grade Silicon’ Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, May 6, 1975 (May 6, 1975), pp. 275-279, XP001050345.
Green, Martin A. et al., ‘High-Efficiency Silicon Solar Cells,’ IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-31, No. 5, May 1984, pp. 679-683.
Hamm, Gary, Wei, Lingyum, Jacques, Dave, Development of a Plated Nickel Seed Layer for Front Side Metallization of Silicon Solar Cells, EU PVSEC Proceedings, Presented Sep. 2009.
JCS Pires, J Otubo, AFB Braga, PR Mei; The purification of metallurgical grade silicon by electron beam melting, J of Mats Process Tech 169 (2005) 16-20.
Khattak, C. P. et al., “Refining Molten Metallurgical Grade Silicon for use as Feedstock for Photovoltaic Applications”, 16th E.C. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, May 1-5, 2000, pp. 1282-1283.
Merriam-Webster online dictionary—“mesh”. (accessed Oct. 8, 2012).
Mueller, Thomas, et al. “Application of wide-band gap hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxide layers to heterojunction solar cells for high quality passivation.” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2008. PVSC'08. 33rd IEEE. IEEE, 2008.
Mueller, Thomas, et al. “High quality passivation for heteroj unction solar cells by hydrogenated amorphous silicon suboxide films.” Applied Physics Letters 92.3 (2008): 033504-033504.
Munzer, K.A. “High Throughput Industrial In-Line Boron BSF Diffusion” Jun. 2005. 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp. 777-780.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office (“Why Do We have Seasons?” http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lmk/?n=seasons Accessed Oct. 18, 2014).
O'Mara, W.C.; Herring, R.B.; Hunt L.P. (1990). Handbook of Semiconductor Silicon Technology. William Andrew Publishing/Noyes. pp. 275-293.
Roedern, B. von, et al., ‘Why is the Open-Circuit Voltage of Crystalline Si Solar Cells so Critically Dependent on Emitter-and Base-Doping?’ Presented at the 9th Workshop on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell Materials and Processes, Breckenridge, CO, Aug. 9-11, 1999.
Stangl et al., Amorphous/Crystalline Silicon heterojunction solar cells—a simulation study; 17th European Photovoltaic Conference, Munich, Oct. 2001.
Warabisako T et al: ‘Efficient Solar Cells From Metallurgical-Grade Silicon’ Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Japan Society of Applied Physics, JP, vol. 19, No. Suppl. 19-01, Jan. 1, 1980 (Jan. 1, 1980), pp. 539-544, XP008036363 ISSN: 0021-4922.
Yao Wen-Jie et al: ‘Interdisciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology;The p recombination layer in tunnel junctions for micromorph tandem solar cells’, Chinese Physics B, Chinese Physics B, Bristol GB, vol. 20, No. 7, Jul. 26, 2011 (Jul. 26, 2011), p. 78402, XP020207379, ISSN: 1674-1056, DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/20/7/078402.
Parthavi, “Doping by Diffusion and Implantation”, <http://www.leb.eei.uni-erlangen.de/winterakademie/2010/report/course03/pdf/0306.pdf>.
Weiss, “Development of different copper seed layers with respect to the copper electroplating process,” Microelectronic Engineering 50 (2000) 443-440, Mar. 15, 2000.
Tomasi, “Back-contacted Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells With Efficiency>21%” 2014 IEEE.
Hornbachner et al., “Cambered Photovoltaic Module and Method for its Manufacture” Jun. 17, 2009.
Machine translation of JP 10004204 A, Shindou et al.
Jianhua Zhao et al. “24% Efficient pert silicon solar cell: Recent improvements in high efficiency silicon cell research”.
“Nonequilibrium boron doping effects in low-temperature epitaxial silicon” Meyerson et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50 (2), p. 113 (1987).
“Doping Diffusion and Implantation” Parthavi, <http://www.leb.eei.uni-erlangen.de/winterakademie/2010/report/content/course03/pdf/0306.pdf>.
Kanani, Nasser. Electroplating: Basic Principles, Processes and Practice, Chapter 8—“Coating Thickness and its Measurement,” 2004, pp. 247-291.
P. Borden et al. “Polysilicon Tunnel Junctions as Alternates to Diffused Junctions” Proceedings of the 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Sep. 1, 2008-Sep. 5, 2008, pp. 1149-1152.
L. Korte et al. “Overview on a-Se:H/c heterojunction solar cells—physics and technology”, Proceedings of the 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Sep. 3, 2007-Sep. 7, 2007, pp. 859-865.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170117423 A1 Apr 2017 US