This invention relates generally to the telephony field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for queuing a communication session in the telephony field.
In recent years, telephony applications have seen advancement due in part to internet based interfaces for telephony applications. The application of internet-based technologies in telephony communication has dramatically expanded the possibilities for telephony applications. Voice or telephony based calls are often limited by the fact that often a user is on one end of the call. In many cases, the resources to support these callers, such as customer service representatives, cannot be dynamically scaled to meet demand. As a result, telephony applications place callers in a holding pattern with the familiar looping music and canned messages. Waiting to leave the holding pattern is an annoyance to the caller, and the bad user experience reflects poorly upon the operators of the telephony application. Additionally, a generic waiting experience will not be suitable for all applications using a telephony platform that supports a wide variety of applications. Some PBX solutions provide basic static customization of music and announcements, but fail to provide flexibility use the queue. Thus, there is a need in the telephony field to create a new and useful system and method for queuing a communication session. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.
The following description of the preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
As shown in
In an exemplary implementation, the system allows accounts or different applications to establish various call queues. The call queues can be for any suitable resource. In many cases, the call queue will be for a connection to an available agent (e.g., customer service representative). In other cases, the call queue could be to a limited resource such as a processing server that provides some unique service such as image processing. Communication sessions can preferably be enqueued during an active communication (e.g., an entity is concurrently participating in a live communication session) or in preparation for an eventually active communication session (e.g., a proxy for an upcoming call is enqueued and a live communication session is not active while waiting in the queue). A communication session may be enqueued in response to an API request and/or an instruction of an application. Any suitable number of queue resources can be generated for an account, and the platform can enable any suitable number of accounts to maintain queue resources. For example, an account on the platform may use the platform to provide a customer service phone system. There may be three call queues that are used for three different regions of customer support. Simultaneously, a second account may use a different queue setup to support a different application. The queues of the preferred embodiment are additionally configured for application execution during various states of waiting in the queue. Different applications, instructions, media resources or other resources can be set to be executed/played for a communication session for a particular state in the call queue. These various queue-state applications (as they may be generally referred) enable developers and account managers to customize the call queue experience.
The communication platform 100 of the preferred embodiment functions to provide a base service that participates in and/or facilitates communication with at least one endpoint. The communication platform can provide a wide variety of services. The communication platform can be a network provider to a collection of endpoints. The communication platform can alternatively include a plurality of call routers such that the communication platform 100 routes calls to various endpoints and/or services according to some configured logic. Preferably, the communication platform 100 facilitates executing communication applications. Communication applications are preferably uniquely configured by developers to provide a wide variety of different solutions such as implementing call trees, conference calls, customer service call systems, automated phone message service, voicemail, programmatic messaging/notifications, or any suitable application.
The communication platform 100 is preferably multi-medium and multitenant. The multi-medium aspect of the communication platform 100 can be defined as a communication platform that facilitates communication over multiple forms of communication. The forms of communication can include PSTN, SIP, SMS, MMS, WebRTC, voice chat, video chat, screen-sharing sessions, IP based messaging, and/or other forms of communication. The communication platform 100 is preferably multitenant in the sense that multiple users, accounts, or entities share resources of the communication platform. The accounts preferably use account authentication practices when working with the application during graphical user interface configuration, API interactions, and/or during other suitable stages of account management. Accounts can further include sub-accounts or any suitable segmentation of application control and operation. The queues of an account are preferably independent from other queues and furthermore other accounts. In some variations, platform level queues may be used to manage account queues to provided resources of the communication platform. The communication platform is preferably a cloud service operating on a distributed computing system, but may alternatively be a computer cluster, an on-premise installation, or on any suitable computing infrastructure. The communication platform operates substantially similar to the communication platform described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,306,021, issued 2 Apr. 2009, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference. The communication platform may alternatively be any suitable network accessible platform.
The queue management resource no functions to control and alter the state of queue resources. The queue management resource no is preferably capable of instantiating, managing, and deleting a queue resource. When an item is instructed to be enqueued and a queue does not exist within the scope of that queue (e.g., within an account, sub-account, platform, etc.), the queue management resource preferably creates a queue resource and adds the enqueued item to the queue. Multiple queues may additionally be created within any given scope. Queues can preferably be specified by including a queue identifier in an enqueue request. An identifier for a non-existent queue preferably results in a queue with the specified queue identifier.
The items added to a queue are preferably communication sessions. The enqueued communication sessions can be added through any suitable process and do not have to originate from the same source. Some communication sessions may be added programmatically through the API, while some may be active communication sessions that transitioned to the queue to await the limited resource. An enqueued communication session can have at least two different states or modes of operation: an active state and an inactive state. The enqueued communication session may be an active communication session with a live participant on at least one endpoint of the communication. A wait-state application (e.g., queue-state application executed while waiting in the queue) will preferably execute and play audio or perform text-to-speech conversion or otherwise engage the connected endpoint as the caller waits. In another variation, the communication session is in an inactive state. An inactive communication session is preferably a proxy for a communication session. The proxy for a communication session is preferably not a live connection, but represents some entity or action that will occur upon dequeuing. The enqueued inactive communication session preferably includes a parameter specifying a communication endpoint that should be connected upon dequeuing. For example, an inactive communication session may be enqueued in response to a communication application of a received SMS message or in response to an API request. In this example, someone can get in a call waiting line and be connected when it's the entity's turn. A communication session can additionally transition between inactive and active. The queue is preferably persistent such that state or place of a communication session in the queue is maintained during changes in state of a communication session. For example, once in line, a caller can hangup (e.g., transition from active to inactive), and the queue will maintain the communication session and take appropriate action to connect the caller when the session is dequeued. A communication session proxy item is progressed through the queue, and upon dequeuing, the caller is connected.
The enqueued communication sessions can additionally be queried and/or manipulated through the API 120. Additionally, a queued communication (active, inactive or an alternative state), may be configured with various queue-state applications. Queue-state applications are preferably executable instructions, services, playable media, and the like that are set to be initiated and performed during particular stages of the queue. A queue-state application is preferably individually executed for a single communication session. Queue-state applications can include at least the variations of an added-state application, a wait-state application, and/or an action state application. There may alternatively be similar applications that execute in the background or interject into the communication sessions based on overall state of the queue or an account. An added-state application is preferably invoked before or alternatively directly after a communication session is added to a queue. The added-state application can be used to announce to the user that they have been added to a queue. A wait-state application is preferably invoked while the communication session is waiting. The wait-state application is preferably invoked repeatedly. Alternatively, the wait-state application may be invoked when updating position or in response to any suitable event. Each time the wait-state application is invoked, updated queue statistics (e.g., estimated wait time, place in the queue, etc.) may be supplied to the application. For example, the wait-state application may include text-to-speech instructions to read to the current user their place in line and then play music for one minute before ending. When this application is looped, the caller is updated with their wait position roughly every minute. The wait-state application may additionally be invoked for non-active communication sessions. Since there is no active endpoint connected in this variation, the wait-state application functions as a background script. For example, the wait-state application may be used to send an SMS message when the user's place in the queue is updated. The action-state application (i.e., an application for the newly dequeued-state) is preferably invoked in response to the communication session being dequeued. For example, the action-state application may play a message notifying a listener that the call is being connected. The action-state application may be configured or defined when a communication session is queued, when the queue is created, or when a dequeuing agent makes a dequeue request. A post-action application can be specified to be transferred control logic control after a dequeuer agent (e.g., a customer care representative) hangs up. Similarly, the control logic can be transferred to an original application that made the original enqueue request. For example, an initial application may include an enqueue instruction followed by instructions to receive customer feedback. A caller is first queued, then an agent helps the caller, and after the agent hangs up, the caller is transferred back to the original application so that the customer feedback instructions can execute. Any alternative types of applications may be configured or specified for the queue or for interactions with the queue.
The queue management resource no additionally includes operational configuration to manage the procession of communication sessions in a queue resource. The queue is preferably managed to enable first in first out queue behavior. The queue can alternatively enforce first in last out queue behavior. The queue could also use various prioritization policies to enable particular queued items to be move through the queue faster or slower than other items. The queue management resource preferably selects the item to dequeue, updating remaining items in the queue to reflect their new position, and add an item to the queue. The queue management resource is preferably responsive to the queue targeted API calls and particular application instructions.
The API 120 with queue targeted interfaces functions to enable programmatic interaction with queued items. An API 120 is preferably a REST API. The API preferably works according to an HTTP request and response model. HTTP requests (or any suitable request communication) to the communication platform 100 and/or the queue management resource 110 preferably observe the principles of a RESTful design. RESTful is understood in this document to describe a Representational State Transfer architecture as is known in the art. The RESTful HTTP requests are preferably stateless. The components of the communication platform and/or the interface service preferably do not need to remember or store previous communications to be aware of the state. Additionally or alternatively, the API 120 may be used or accessed through application instructions. The API 120 preferably works around a queue instance resource that allows users to query and manage the state of individual call queues. Call queues can be referenced using a queue identifier. When using a REST API, a particular queue may be referenced by a resource URI with the following pattern: “/2010-04-01/Accounts/{AccountSid}/Queues/{QueueSid}”. A queue resource may include various properties such as an identifier, a friendly name (i.e., a user-provided string that identifies the queue), a current size metric, maximum size, average wait time, and/or any suitable property. A queue resource can additionally include a members sub-resource. The members sub-resource is preferably a list of communication sessions currently in the queue. A member instance is preferably the construct or proxy for an enqueued communication session. A member resource can include properties such as data enqueued, wait time, position, queue-state application configuration, and/or any suitable properties. The API 120 is preferably used to query information of the queue resources, but may additionally be used to manipulate or modify aspects of the queue. When the queue resources are used in application instructions, a call router or other suitable communication processor can add, remove, connect, and/or manage members of the queue (i.e., communication sessions of the queue). In one implementation, there is an enqueue instruction, which can be used to add a communication session as a member resource. Attributes of the enqueue instruction can include an action-state application configuration, a wait-state application configuration, other queue-state application configuration, and/or any suitable attribute. The name of the queue may additionally be specified to identify which queue is to be used. If no queue is specified, a default queue can be used. A queue-state application configuration is preferably an absolute or relative URI, but the configuration can alternatively be application logic, an application data file, or any suitable application configuration. Queue-state applications may be limited in their functionality. For example, a wait-state application may be limited to play, say, pause, hangup, redirect, leave, and gather instructions during a telephony communication. Accessing queued members preferably involves using a queue instruction. The queue instruction is preferably specified within a dial instruction. When invoking a queue instruction within a dial instruction, the queue is accessed and the first enqueued communication session is connected. If the queue is empty, one variation may include the dialing entity or agent waiting until a new communication session joins the queue. Alternatively, an error or other suitable response may be returned if the queue is empty or does not exist. An application configuration can be configured with the queue instruction to specify an application to be invoked directly preceding, during, or directly after dequeuing a communication session.
2. Method for Queuing a Communication Session
As shown in
Step S110, which recites at a queue manager receiving a request to enqueue a communication session, functions to obtain a notification from an entity to add a communication session to a queue. The request is preferably communicated from a telephony application. More preferably, the request is initiated by a telephony application instruction such as in the example request shown in
Preferably, the request to enqueue a communication session specifies various queuing parameters that define the queuing behavior for that communication session. The queuing parameters may include a wait-state application, an action-state application, a queue identifier, a time-out, queue error application, and/or any suitable queuing parameter. The wait-state application, the action-state applications, and/or any suitable application parameters are preferably universal resource indicators (URIs) that reference an internet accessible resource with application instructions. The wait-state, action-state, or other applications may alternatively be any suitable reference to a queue-state application. Alternatively, queuing parameters may be specified to define queue behavior for an application, a user-account, a platform, or any suitable entity. As mentioned, the request may specify a queue identifier. The queue identifier may be for an application-based namespace or a global namespace. A default queue for a telephony application or account may be used if a queue identifier is not specified. In other words, the lack of a specified queue identifier within an account may be an implicit identifier for the default queue of the account. If a queue does not yet exist, one is preferably created. If the intended queue is unavailable due to capacity or other limitations, a new queue may be created, an error response taken, or any suitable action may be taken.
S120, adding the communication session to a queue of a plurality of communication sessions, functions to appropriately add the communication session to a queue. The queue is preferably a prioritized or ordered list of communication sessions (i.e., queue members) ordered by priority, and the recently added communication session is preferably added to the end of the communication queue. Depending on the type of queue management policy in place, the communication session may alternatively be placed in any suitable location in the queue. The entities/members in the queue are preferably persistent and may be decoupled from any associated active communication session. In other words, the communication session stored in the queue may be a proxy representative for a prior and/or subsequent communication session. In one exemplary application described in more detail below, a caller may hang-up once they are placed on hold, but their place in the queue is maintained despite the fact that the user no longer has an active communication session. In other words, an active communication session can become inactive while in the queue, and an inactive communication session can become active. An inactive communication session preferably becomes active in various ways. In one variation, the communication session becomes active by the communication platform calling out to the original endpoint of the enqueued communication session. In a second variation, the communication platform can reestablish an active communication session for an incoming communication to the original endpoint made by the endpoint associated with the enqueued communication session. For example, endpoint A calls service B. Service B queues the caller of endpoint A and plays some waiting music. The caller of endpoint A may hang up, and the place of endpoint A is managed in the queue as if the caller was still actively listening to the waiting music. Endpoint A can then call service B a second time, and the communication platform identifies that a communication session is already established between endpoint A and service B, and will reconnect the caller to the enqueued communication session. When added to the queue, the queue manager may additionally begin accounting for the communication session when measuring queue analytics. The queue analytics preferably includes statistics on overall queue properties (e.g., average wait time, number of queued communication sessions, etc.) and individual communication session queue properties (e.g., total wait time, number in line, etc.). The queue analytics is fed back to the wait state application to enable the wait state application to feed back queue information to the enqueued user.
Additionally, Step S120 preferably includes transferring control of the communication session to a wait-state application while the communication session is in the queue as shown in
In a variation of a preferred embodiment, the method may include handling an error response after a failure of adding the communication session to a queue, which functions to recover from the situation where a communication session cannot be added to a queue. A communication session may not be able to be added to a queue if the queue is full, if the wait time is beyond a wait limit, or for any suitable reason or error. A failure state application is preferably transferred control of the communication session as part of the error response. A failure state application is preferably configured in a manner substantially similar to the wait-state application and action state application. The failure application is preferably transferred control of the communication session when an error response is received after attempting to add the communication session to a queue. Alternatively or additionally, the failure state application may be invoked for an error at any suitable time such as an error when dequeuing a communication session. The failure state application may provide any suitable application logic for gracefully handling an error. The type of error and any suitable error information may be passed to the failure state application. The failure state application can preferably elect to place the communication session in a second queue. A second queue may be pre-existing or generated in response to the error.
S130, which recites managing the procession of communication sessions in the queue, functions to update the queue based on specified or default queue heuristics. The management of the queue preferably includes adding new communication sessions to the appropriate location, updating priority/order of communication sessions, and dequeuing communication sessions. The queue is preferably configured to apply a standardized queuing heuristic. One exemplary preferred queuing policy would be a “last in, last out” policy, where queued communication sessions are dequeued in the order they are queued. However, the dequeuing and prioritization of sessions may follow any suitable heuristic. Other queuing heuristics may include “first in, last out”, a priority-based policy, random selection, or any suitable heuristic to determine the servicing of the queue. The queuing heuristic may be based on properties of the queued communication sessions such as associated account IDs, phone numbers, or any suitable parameter of the communication sessions.
The queue manager may additionally enable customization of queue behavior through specifying a parameter in the queue request or through a queue API. As mentioned, the queue manager may additionally include an interface to enable dynamic queue management. The queue manager preferably has an application programming interface (API) so that an outside party may make changes to the queue and/or query status of the queue. The queue API preferably exposes various API resources, service calls, or other mechanisms that are responsive to requests to add or remove communication sessions from a queue and to requests for analytics of the call queue. The queue API may be used to retrieve queue statistics/analytics, the status of a communication session in the queue, modify the ordering of communication sessions in the queue, add or remove a communication session, alter the behavior of the queue, delete or create queues, and/or perform any suitable action. In providing a queue API interface, the method functions to enable API calls that are responsive to managing members of a queue resource and querying information of the queue. Managing members of the queue preferably includes calls that add, remove, and/or reposition communication sessions in a queue. Querying information of a queue preferably includes accessing overall queue analytics, queue member specific analytics, and/or other forms of information about the queue. The queues are preferably presented as REST API resources. For example, a queue named Foo of account Bar may be targeted in an API request through an API call to “/2010-04-01/Accounts/Bar/Queues/Foo”. By issuing an HTTP GET to this queue resource, information about the queue can be retrieved. By issuing an HTTP POST to this resource, properties such as max size, queue name, and other attributes can be changed. Similarly, members of the Foo queue resource (i.e., the enqueued communication sessions) can be targeted with API calls to “/2010-04-01/Accounts/Bar/Queues/Foo/Members/”. A list of members can be retrieved or specific communication sessions can be targeted by appending a communication session id or descriptor (e.g., front or back).
S140, which recites dequeuing the communication session and bridging the communication session to a second entity according to the management of the queue, functions to connect the communication session with another party when the communication session is selected to be dequeued. Phrased another way, block S140 functions to establish communication of an enqueued communication session with a second entity. Bridging the communication session to a second entity can include establishing a connection between a second endpoint and the endpoint of the communication session. If the communication session is active this may simple include merging the enqueued communication session with a second communication session, where the second communication session is one established between the second entity and at least the communication platform. If the communication session is inactive, bridging may include calling out or re-establishing an active communication session with the original caller (i.e., the user associated with the enqueued communication session), and then subsequently merging the communication session with a second communication session. The second entity is in many exemplary situations associated with a limited resource that necessitated the need of the queue. For example, the second entity may be a voice connection to a customer representative (i.e., the dequeuer) for whom an initial caller had been waiting. The second entity may alternatively be an application or device with less capacity than demand. The dequeuing of the communication session may be initiated by the second entity, but a request to dequeue a communication session may alternatively be made by any suitable party. In one embodiment, the second entity is a telephony application that dials the queue to initiate bridging with the next communication session in the queue. As shown in
Additionally, step S140 preferably includes transferring control of a communication session to an action-state application in response to dequeuing the communication session S142 as shown in
The customizable queue of the preferred embodiment may be utilized be developers to create a wide variety of queue systems. As a first example application of a preferred embodiment, the method may be employed to enable a call waiting system where callers are not required to stay on the line. A caller can preferably communicate that they would like to hold a place in line. In one variation, the user may be placed in the line due to the control logic of a telephony application with which the user has a voice connection. Once a place in the line has been established, the user may hang up while the communication session remains queued in the persistent queue. In a second variation, the user may use an alternative form of communication to initiate getting in line. For example, the user may send a text message to a specified number, that number may be directly associated with the queue or may be associated with an application that enqueues a communication session on behalf of the user. Similarly, a communication session may be automatically enqueued without direct initiation of a user. This variation functions to illustrate how an active communication session does not need to exist prior to being enqueued. As an additional feature, while the communication session is enqueued, a wait-state application may facilitate a user establishing a connection to the enqueued communication session. The user may call a number that identifies the associated queued communication session, and connects the user with the communication session in the queue as if the user never left the holding state. Similarly, the user may send a message to a phone number and in response, receive a message indicating the wait time, position in line, and/or any suitable message. When the communication session is dequeued and there is no active connection to the queued communication session, the action-state application preferably establishes a connection with the intended user. So for a user that had hung up when placed on hold, the system preferably calls the user. After the caller has an active connection then the call is preferably bridged with the intended person or device.
In a second exemplary application of a preferred embodiment, the API of a queue is preferably used to dynamically alter the waiting experience of a user. A user may have been placed in a line waiting for the next available customer representative. While waiting for the customer representative, the user may listen to a message controlled by the wait-state application. The wait-state application may include an advertisement of a way to skip ahead in the line. For example, a user may receive queue priority by listening to an advertisement, answering a survey, agreeing to be charged a fee, or through any suitable action. In response to the action of the user, the wait-state application preferably uses the queue API to alter the ordering of the communication sessions in the queue so that the user will be dequeued sooner than if they had not performed that action.
A system for an alternative embodiment preferably implements the above methods in a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with a queue manager of a telephony/communication platform. The computer-readable medium may be stored on any suitable computer readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a processor but the instructions may alternatively or additionally be executed by any suitable dedicated hardware device. As mentioned above, the queue manager is preferably integrated with a telephony/communication platform. More preferably the queue manager is integrated into a cloud hosted communication platform. As part of a cloud computing infrastructure, a cluster of a queue managers preferably are preferably coordinated to manage the allocation and deallocation of queues, load balancing of communication sessions in the queues, and any suitable issues of managing a plurality of queues in a multitenant environment.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/661,730, filed on 19 Jun. 2012, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5526416 | Dezonno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5581608 | Jreij et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598457 | Foladare et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5934181 | Adamczewski | Aug 1999 | A |
6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138143 | Gigliotti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6185565 | Meubus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192123 | Grunsted et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6373836 | Deryugin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426995 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430175 | Echols et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434528 | Sanders | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445776 | Shank et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459913 | Cloutier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496500 | Nance et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501832 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507875 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6577721 | Vainio et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600736 | Ball et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614783 | Sonesh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625258 | Ram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625576 | Kochanski et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6704785 | Koo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707889 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711249 | Weissman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6738738 | Henton | May 2004 | B2 |
6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765997 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768788 | Langseth et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778653 | Kallas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788768 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792086 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792093 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798867 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807529 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819667 | Brusilovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820260 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829334 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834265 | Balasuriya | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836537 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873952 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874084 | Dobner et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885737 | Gao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898567 | Balasuriya | May 2005 | B2 |
6912581 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922411 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6931405 | El-Shimi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937699 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940953 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941268 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947988 | Saleh | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6964012 | Zirngibl et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970915 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6977992 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985862 | Stroem et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999576 | Sacra | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003464 | Ferrans et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006606 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010586 | Allavarpu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039165 | Saylor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7062709 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076037 | Gonen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076428 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103003 | Brueckheimer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106844 | Holland | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111163 | Haney | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7197331 | Anastasakos et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197461 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197462 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197544 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7225232 | Elberse | May 2007 | B2 |
7227849 | Raesaenen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7260208 | Cavalcanti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266181 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269557 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272564 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277851 | Henton | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283515 | Fowler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7287248 | Adeeb | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7289453 | Riedel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296739 | Mo et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7298732 | Cho | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308085 | Weissman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308408 | Stifelman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7324633 | Gao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324942 | Mahowald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328263 | Sadjadi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330463 | Bradd et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7330890 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7349714 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369865 | Gabriel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373660 | Guichard et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376223 | Taylor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376586 | Partovi et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376733 | Connelly et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376740 | Porter et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7412525 | Cafarella et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428302 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440898 | Eberle et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7447299 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7457397 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7473872 | Takimoto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486780 | Zirngibl et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496054 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500249 | Kampe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505951 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519359 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522711 | Stein et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7536454 | Balasuriya | May 2009 | B2 |
7552054 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7571226 | Partovi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7613287 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7623648 | Oppenheim et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630900 | Strom | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7631310 | Henzinger | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7644000 | Strom | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657433 | Chang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657434 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668157 | Weintraub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672295 | Andhare et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7675857 | Chesson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7676221 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715547 | Ibbotson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7779065 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7875836 | Imura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882253 | Pardo-Castellote et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7920866 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926099 | Chakravarty et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7936867 | Hill et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7962644 | Ezerzer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979555 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8069096 | Ballaro et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8081958 | Soederstroem et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103725 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126128 | Hicks, III et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8149716 | Ramanathan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150918 | Edelman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8156213 | Deng et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8233611 | Zettner | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8243889 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8295272 | Boni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306021 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8326805 | Arous et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8346630 | McKeown | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8355394 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429827 | Wetzel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8438315 | Tao et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462670 | Chien et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8509068 | Begall et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532686 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542805 | Agranovsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8594626 | Woodson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8611338 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8649268 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667056 | Proulx et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675493 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8755376 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8806024 | Francis et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8837465 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838707 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9014664 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015702 | Bhat | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20010038624 | Greenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043684 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006124 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006125 | Josse et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006193 | Rodenbusch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077833 | Arons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020126813 | Partovi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136391 | Armstrong | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165957 | Devoe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006137 | Wei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014665 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026426 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046366 | Pardikar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051037 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058884 | Kallner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059020 | Meyerson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061317 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061404 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123640 | Roelle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195990 | Greenblat | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196076 | Zabarski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211842 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040011690 | Marfino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044953 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052349 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071275 | Bowater et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101122 | Da Palma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040165569 | Sweatman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172482 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205689 | Ellens et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213400 | Golitsin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228469 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005200 | Matena et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010483 | Ling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021626 | Prajapat et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025303 | Hostetler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038772 | Colrain | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043952 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047579 | Salame | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091572 | Gavrilescu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125251 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128961 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135578 | Ress et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177635 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181835 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238153 | Chevalier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240659 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243977 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246176 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008073 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015467 | Morken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067506 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129638 | Deakin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168334 | Potti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060203979 | Jennings | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209695 | Archer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215824 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217823 | Hussey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217978 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222166 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262915 | Marascio et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285489 | Francisco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002744 | Mewhinney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050306 | Mcqueen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070906 | Thakur | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070980 | Phelps et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074174 | Thornton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070121651 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127691 | Lert, Jr. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127703 | Siminoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130260 | Weintraub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133771 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149166 | Turcotte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153711 | Dykas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192629 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208862 | Fox et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232284 | Mason et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242626 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265073 | Novi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286180 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293200 | Roundtree et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005275 | Overton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025320 | Bangalore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037746 | Dufrene et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040484 | Yardley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052395 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091843 | Kulkarni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101571 | Harlow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104348 | Kabzinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134049 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139166 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146268 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152101 | Griggs | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154601 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155029 | Helbling et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162482 | Ahern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165708 | Moore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177883 | Hanai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209050 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232574 | Baluja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235230 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275741 | Loeffen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313318 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316931 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317222 | Griggs et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317232 | Couse et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090046838 | Andreasson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052437 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052641 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074159 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075684 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083155 | Tudor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089165 | Sweeney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089699 | Saha et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093250 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125608 | Werth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129573 | Gavan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136011 | Goel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170496 | Bourque | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171659 | Pearce et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171669 | Engelsma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171752 | Galvin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182896 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217293 | Wolber et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220057 | Waters | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090221310 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222341 | Belwadi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225748 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225763 | Forsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232289 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235349 | Lai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252159 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288165 | Qiu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300194 | Ogasawara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316687 | Kruppa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318112 | Vasten | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037204 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082513 | Liu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087215 | Gu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088187 | Courtney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088698 | Krishnamurthy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115041 | Hawkins et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150139 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167689 | Sepehri-Nik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188979 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191915 | Spencer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208881 | Kawamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232594 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251329 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281108 | Cohen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291910 | Sanding et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110029882 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053555 | Cai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078278 | Cui et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081008 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083179 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093516 | Geng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096673 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110366 | Moore et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131293 | Mori | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167172 | Roach et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170505 | Rajasekar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176537 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211679 | Mezhibovsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251921 | Kassaei et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253693 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255675 | Jasper et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265172 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274111 | Narasappa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276892 | Jensen-Horne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280390 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283259 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289126 | Aikas et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299672 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310902 | Xu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320449 | Gudlavenkatasiva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320550 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000903 | Baarman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011274 | Moreman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017222 | May | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028602 | Lisi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036574 | Heithcock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039202 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120079066 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083266 | VanSwol et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110564 | Ran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120114112 | Rauschenberger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120149404 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173610 | Bleau et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174095 | Natchadalingam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198004 | Watte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201238 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208495 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226579 | Ha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239757 | Firstenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254828 | Aiylam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281536 | Gell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288082 | Segall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290706 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304245 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304275 | Ji et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316809 | Egolf et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321070 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130029629 | Lindholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031158 | Salsburg | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054684 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058262 | Parreira | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067448 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130156024 | Burg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130201909 | Bosch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204786 | Mattes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212603 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130244632 | Spence et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140064467 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140105372 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106704 | Cooke et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140123187 | Reisman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129363 | Lorah et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153565 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185490 | Holm et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254600 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274086 | Boerjesson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282473 | Saraf et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140355600 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004932 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150004933 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023251 | Giakoumelis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150181631 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1684587 | Mar 1971 | DE |
0282126 | Sep 1988 | EP |
1464418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1522922 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1770586 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2134107 | Sep 1999 | ES |
10294788 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2004166000 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004220118 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006319914 | Nov 2006 | JP |
9732448 | Sep 1997 | WO |
02087804 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2006037492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2009018489 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009124223 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010037064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010040010 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010101935 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011091085 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax; T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter; Jan. 2005; The Internet Society. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement, Telinit Technologies, LLC v.Twilio Inc., dated Oct. 12, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130336472 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61661730 | Jun 2012 | US |