This invention relates generally to the field of cooling systems and, more particularly, to a system and method of boiling heat transfer using self-induced coolant transport and impingements.
A variety of different types of structures can generate heat or thermal energy in operation. To prevent such structures from over heating, a variety of different types of cooling systems may be utilized to dissipate the thermal energy. To facilitate the dissipation of such thermal energy in such cooling systems, a variety of different types of coolants may be utilized.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a cooling system for a heat-generating structure comprises a chamber and structure disposed within the chamber. The chamber has an inlet and an outlet. The inlet receives fluid coolant into the chamber substantially in the form of a liquid. The outlet dispenses the fluid coolant out of the chamber at least partially in the form of a vapor. The structure disposed within the chamber receive thermal energy from the heat generating structure and transfers at least a portion of the thermal energy to the fluid coolant. The thermal energy from the heat-generating structure causes at least a portion of the fluid coolant substantially in the form of a liquid to boil and effuse vapor upon contact with a portion of the structure. The effusion of vapor creates a self-induced flow in the chamber. The self-induced flow distributes non-vaporized fluid coolant substantially in the form of a liquid to other portions of the structure.
Certain embodiments of the invention may provide numerous technical advantages. For example, a technical advantage of one embodiment may include the capability to enhance heat transfer in a coolant stream. Other technical advantages of other embodiments may include the capability to utilize pin fin configurations to alter the heat transfer phenomenology and thereby enhance the transfer of thermal energy. Yet other technical advantages of other embodiments may include the capability to reduce a flow requirement into a chamber utilized for heat transfer.
Although specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include all, some, or none of the enumerated advantages. Additionally, other technical advantages may become readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after review of the following figures and description.
For a more complete understanding of example embodiments of the present invention and its advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It should be understood at the outset that although example embodiments of the present invention are illustrated below, the present invention may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or in existence. The present invention should in no way be limited to the example embodiments, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, including the embodiments and implementation illustrated and described herein. Additionally, the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The cooling system 10 of
The structure 12 may be arranged and designed to conduct heat or thermal energy to the channels 23, 24. To receive this thermal energy or heat, the channels 23, 24 may be disposed on an edge of the structure 12 or may extend through portions of the structure 12, for example, through a thermal plane of structure 12. In particular embodiments, the channels 23, 24 may extend up to the components of the structure 12, directly receiving thermal energy from the components. Further, in particular embodiments the channels 23, 24 may be cold walls. Although two channels 23, 24 are shown in the cooling system 10 of
In operation, a fluid coolant flows through each of the channels 23, 24. As discussed later, this fluid coolant may be a two-phase fluid coolant, which enters inlet conduits 25 of channels 23, 24 in liquid form. Absorption of heat from the structure 12 causes part or all of the liquid coolant to boil and vaporize such that some or all of the fluid coolant leaves the exit conduits 27 of channels 23, 24 in a vapor phase. To facilitate such absorption or transfer of thermal energy, the channels 23, 24 may be lined with pin fins or other similar surface enhancement devices which, among other things, increase surface contact between the fluid coolant and walls of the channels 23, 24. Further details of the surface enhancement configurations, namely pin fin configurations, are described below with reference to
The fluid coolant departs the exit conduits 27 and flows through the condenser heat exchanger 41, the expansion reservoir 42, a pump 46, and a respective one of two orifices 47 and 48, in order to again to reach the inlet conduits 25 of the channels 23, 24. The pump 46 may cause the fluid coolant to circulate around the loop shown in
The orifices 47 and 48 in particular embodiments may facilitate proper partitioning of the fluid coolant among the respective channels 23, 24, and may also help to create a large pressure drop between the output of the pump 46 and the channels 23, 24 in which the fluid coolant vaporizes. The orifices 47 and 48 may have the same size, or may have different sizes in order to partition the coolant in a proportional manner which facilitates a desired cooling profile.
A flow 56 of fluid (either gas or liquid) may be forced to flow through the condenser heat exchanger 41, for example by a fan (not shown) or other suitable device. In particular embodiments, the flow 56 of fluid may be ambient fluid. The condenser heat exchanger 41 transfers heat from the fluid coolant to the flow 56 of ambient fluid, thereby causing any portion of the fluid coolant which is in the vapor phase to condense back into a liquid phase. In particular embodiments, a liquid bypass 49 may be provided for liquid fluid coolant that either may have exited the channels 23, 24 or that may have condensed from vapor fluid coolant during travel to the condenser heat exchanger 41.
The liquid fluid coolant exiting the condenser heat exchanger 41 may be supplied to the expansion reservoir 42. Since fluids typically take up more volume in their vapor phase than in their liquid phase, the expansion reservoir 42 may be provided in order to take up the volume of liquid fluid coolant that is displaced when some or all of the coolant in the system changes from its liquid phase to its vapor phase. The amount of the fluid coolant which is in its vapor phase can vary over time, due in part to the fact that the amount of heat or thermal energy being produced by the structure 12 will vary over time, as the structure 12 system operates in various operational modes.
Turning now in more detail to the fluid coolant, one highly efficient technique for removing heat from a surface is to boil and vaporize a liquid which is in contact with a surface. As the liquid vaporizes in this process, it inherently absorbs heat to effectuate such vaporization. The amount of heat that can be absorbed per unit volume of a liquid is commonly known as the latent heat of vaporization of the liquid. The higher the latent heat of vaporization, the larger the amount of heat that can be absorbed per unit volume of liquid being vaporized.
The fluid coolant used in the embodiment of
Water boils at a temperature of approximately 100° C. at an atmospheric pressure of 14.7 pounds per square inch absolute (psia). In particular embodiments, the fluid coolant's boiling temperature may be reduced to between 55-65° C. by subjecting the fluid coolant to a subambient pressure of about 2-3 psia. Thus, in the cooling system 10 of
In particular embodiments, the fluid coolant flowing from the pump 46 to the orifices 47 and 48 may have a temperature of approximately 55° C. to 65° C. and a pressure of approximately 12 psia as referenced above. After passing through the orifices 47 and 48, the fluid coolant may still have a temperature of approximately 55° C. to 65° C., but may also have a lower pressure in the range about 2 psia to 3 psia. Due to this reduced pressure, some or all of the fluid coolant will boil or vaporize as it passes through and absorbs heat from the channels 23 and 24.
After exiting the exits ports 27 of the channels 23, 24, the subambient coolant vapor travels to the condenser heat exchanger 41 where heat or thermal energy can be transferred from the subambient fluid coolant to the flow 56 of fluid. The flow 56 of fluid in particular embodiments may have a temperature of less than 50° C. In other embodiments, the flow 56 may have a temperature of less than 40° C. As heat is removed from the fluid coolant, any portion of the fluid which is in its vapor phase will condense such that substantially all of the fluid coolant will be in liquid form when it exits the condenser heat exchanger 41. At this point, the fluid coolant may have a temperature of approximately 55° C. to 65° C. and a subambient pressure of approximately 2 psia to 3 psia. The fluid coolant may then flow to pump 46, which in particular embodiments 46 may increase the pressure of the fluid coolant to a value in the range of approximately 12 psia, as mentioned earlier. Prior to the pump 46, there may be a fluid connection to an expansion reservoir 42 which, when used in conjunction with the pressure controller 51, can control the pressure within the cooling loop.
It will be noted that the embodiment of
Although components of one embodiment of a cooling system 10 have been shown in
In boiling heat transfer, there are four general ways in which a fluid interacts with a surface: (1) pool boiling, (2) flow boiling, (3) jet impingement cooling, and (4) spray cooling. With pool boiling, a volume of coolant comes in contact with a heated surface and the coolant is not forced to flow over the surface using a pump or other forcible method. Rather, gravity feeds coolant to the heated surface to replenish the coolant that has turned to vapor. Pool boiling reaches a limit when the effusing vapor does not allow for adequate coolant replenishment. When this happens, a film of vapor develops between the heated surface and the body of coolant as the boiling action transitions to film boiling. As a result, a higher temperature of the heated surface is required to drive the heat through the vapor film for boiling to happen at the vapor-liquid interface. When this happens the heat transfer coefficient drops significantly resulting in poor transfer of heat.
With flow boiling, coolant is forced to flow across the heated surface. As a result, vapor bubbles are washed away allowing for liquid coolant to replenish the coolant that has vaporized. This approach, in general, supports higher heat fluxes and yields higher heat transfer coefficients than pool boiling. Flow boiling has a limit at which there can be so much vapor produced that even a forced flow of coolant can not ensure adequate wetting of the heated surface. Flow boiling can also transition to film boiling, but generally at significantly higher heat fluxes than pool boiling.
With jet impingement cooling, coolant is forced to impinge the heated surface due to the momentum of the coolant coming out of a jet. The coolant forcibly passes through any vapor bubbles or a vapor film to wet the heated surface and pushes the vapor bubbles outward along the heated surface. Once the coolant flow is away from the area of impingement, the coolant flow behaves like flow boiling as there is no more impingement action to penetrate a volume of bubbles or a vapor film.
Spray cooling creates a mist or stream of coolant drops that impact the heated surface. In this case a thin liquid film of coolant is “painted” on the surface. As the coolant vaporizes, it is replenished by a continuing stream of mist from the spay head. Because spray nozzles for spray cooling are typically positioned at an appreciable distance from the heated surface, spray cooling is unsuitable for particular applications, namely densely packaged electronics.
For conventional two-phase coldplates to be efficient, coolant typically flows in excess of that needed for energy balance to ensure wetting of the surfaces by forcing the removal of created vapor—thereby preventing surfaces from transitioning to film boiling. In an energy balance, a flow rate of “1×” is the amount of flow necessary to absorb thermal energy with 100% conversion—that is, one unit of liquid is put in that totally goes to vapor and takes out all the heat. For coldplates that require low temperature gradients, the required flow rate can be many times that needed for energy balance (1×)—that is, flow rates on the order of 3×, 4×, 5×, or 6×. This is due to the confining action of the walls of the fin stock, which create channels that allow the effusing vapor to hold the liquid off the walls thus preventing wetting. Thus, such conventional configurations need very high flow rates to allow the momentum of the liquid stream to overcome the ability of the effusing vapor to hold the liquid trapped in the vapor stream.
To overcome the action of the vapor that prevents wetting of the walls, the above-referenced jet impingement cooling or spray cooling may be utilized. Although jet impingement and spray cooling work well, they are more complex and may not be able to be used due to packaging limitations. Accordingly, teaching of some embodiments of the invention recognize that pin fins configurations can be utilized to alter the heat transfer phenomenology and thereby enhance heat transfer. In some of such embodiments, when a small amount of liquid enters a field of pin fins, a violent, exploding, and chaotic reaction occurs as liquid vaporizes. This reaction disperses the unvaporized liquid as globs amongst the pin fins in a Brownian motion-like or stochastic-like manner. This dispersion can create jet impingement-like and spray-like qualities with a low flow rate.
With reference to
In particular embodiments, pin fins 113, 115, may be used inside a coldplate, allowing the coolant to move in multiple directions since there are no confining walls. At high heat fluxes, the effusing vapor creates a violent and near chaotic flow with liquid entrained in the vapor. Because the effusing vapor is confined to the core of the coldplate, its motion is internal to the core thus forcing it over the pin fins 113, 115. As the vapor effuses, it transports unvaporized liquid coolant in a near chaotic swirl, which results in the pin fins being impinged with liquid coolant. The vapor produced at all sites of the pin fins 113, 115 collectively energizes the swirl of vapor with liquid embedded in it. Additionally, globs of liquid coolant (e.g., formed from the vaporization of other liquid coolant) are thrown against downstream pin fins 113, 115—creating a spray cooling-like quality. Accordingly, the pin fin configurations 110A, 110B allow a cross flowing coolant to be used while taking advantage of the attributes of jet impingement and spray cooling, which are provided by the chaotic cross flowing liquid impacting the pin fins 113, 115. Such a phenomenology in particular embodiments may result in a need for less coolant flow rate because the effusing vapor self induces the flow of coolant and creates a form of spray cooling or jet impingement cooling as the liquid impinges the pins. In other words, the spraying effect in particular embodiments is self-induced by the effusing vapor—that is, the energizing means for the spraying effect is the effusing vapor itself.
As referenced above, in particular embodiments relatively small flow rates may be used with pin fin configurations. In some of such embodiments, reduced pumping requirements, reduced sizes of flow lines, and the like may be achieved. Generally, a flow rate of “1×” is the amount of flow necessary to absorb thermal energy with 100% conversion—that is, one unit of liquid is put in that totally goes to vapor and takes out all the heat. To ensure proper wetting, for example in conventional configurations described above, flow rates must typically be on the order of 3×, 4×, 5×, or 6×. Such flow rates provide excessive amount of liquids. In particular embodiments, such conventional configurations can be contrasted with pin fin configurations in which the chaotic action reduces the flow rate towards 1×. For example, in particular embodiments, flow rate requirements for pin fin configurations can be 1.1×, 1.2×, or 1.3×. Thus, a dribble of liquid can be provided at the opening of the chamber housing the pin fins. Upon the liquid contacting the pin fins, the chaotic reaction occurs dispersing the liquid in a Brownian motion-like manner amongst all pin fins in the chamber.
A further benefit of the above referenced distribution in particular embodiments is small temperature differentials amongst the pin fins. Because the chaotic reaction creates Brownian motion-like distributions, the—result is a near-equal energy transfer distribution amongst pin fins—that is, each of the pins fins is allowed to transfer its thermal energy to the fluid in more equal-like manner. Thus, the chaos of the effusing action creates order in the thermal energy transfer. In particular embodiments, temperature differentials amongst pin fins can be on the order of one degrees Celsius.
A yet further benefit of the above referenced distribution in particular embodiments is prevention of excess fluid. Excess fluid is created by either excess flows or spray nozzles that spray outside of an effective thermal transfer area. In particular embodiments, fluid slightly above that needed for energy balance (1×) may be placed in the chamber of pin fins and the chaotic action will equally distribute the fluid amongst the pin fins.
In particular embodiments, no powering mechanism (e.g., a pump or the like) is needed to create a flow in the system. Rather, flow may be gravity fed to the pins fins (as is seen in
The pin fins 113, 115 may be made of a variety of materials and may take on a variety of sizes and shapes. In this embodiment, the pin fins are made of a nickel plated copper and vary in size from 0.04 inches high to 0.1675 inches high. The pin fins 113, 115 are shown with a columnar shape. In other embodiments, the pin fins 113, 115 may be made of other materials, may have heights less than 0.04 inches, may have heights greater than 0.1675 inches, and may have shapes other than columnar shapes. Additionally, in other embodiments the pin fins 113, 115 may be arranged in configurations other than inline or staggered configurations. Further, in particular embodiments, the pin fins may be made of a conductive foam or conductive fiber.
The pin fin configuration 140 of
The embodiments of pin fin configurations may be utilized in a variety of configurations including but not limited to:
Although the present invention has been described with several embodiments, a myriad of changes, variations, alterations, transformations, and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the present invention encompass such changes, variations, alterations, transformation, and modifications as they fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent Ser. No. 11/465,372 filed on Aug. 17, 2006 which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/290,065 filed on Nov. 30, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1528619 | Alphonse | Mar 1925 | A |
1906422 | Roulton | May 1933 | A |
2321964 | Zieber | Jun 1943 | A |
2371443 | Harold | Mar 1945 | A |
2991978 | Jones | Jul 1961 | A |
3131548 | Chubb et al. | May 1964 | A |
3174540 | Dutton | Mar 1965 | A |
3371298 | Narbut | Feb 1968 | A |
3524497 | Chu et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3586101 | Chu | Jun 1971 | A |
3609991 | Chu et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3756903 | Jones | Sep 1973 | A |
3774677 | Antonetti et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3989102 | Jaster et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4003213 | Cox | Jan 1977 | A |
4019098 | McCready et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4129180 | Larinoff | Dec 1978 | A |
4169356 | Kingham | Oct 1979 | A |
4295341 | Gale | Oct 1981 | A |
4296455 | Leaycraft et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4301861 | Larinoff | Nov 1981 | A |
4330033 | Okada et al. | May 1982 | A |
4381817 | Brigida et al. | May 1983 | A |
4411756 | Bennett et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4495988 | Grossman | Jan 1985 | A |
4511376 | Coury | Apr 1985 | A |
4585054 | Köprunner | Apr 1986 | A |
4638642 | Tokuno | Jan 1987 | A |
4733293 | Gabuzda | Mar 1988 | A |
4794984 | Lin | Jan 1989 | A |
4851856 | Altoz | Jul 1989 | A |
4938280 | Clark | Jul 1990 | A |
4945980 | Umezawa | Aug 1990 | A |
4998181 | Haws et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5019880 | Higgins, III | May 1991 | A |
5021924 | Kieda et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5067560 | Carey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5086829 | Asakawa | Feb 1992 | A |
5128689 | Wong et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5148859 | Beamer | Sep 1992 | A |
5158136 | Azar | Oct 1992 | A |
5161610 | Leidinger | Nov 1992 | A |
5168919 | Berenholz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181395 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183104 | Novotny | Feb 1993 | A |
5198889 | Hisano et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5239443 | Fahey et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245839 | Chang et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5261246 | Blackmon et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5333677 | Molivadas | Aug 1994 | A |
5353865 | Adiutori et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5447189 | Mcintyre | Sep 1995 | A |
5464325 | Albring et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5493305 | Wooldridge et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497631 | Lorentzen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501082 | Tachibana et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515690 | Blackmon et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522452 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5605054 | Chen | Feb 1997 | A |
5655600 | Dewar et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666269 | Romero et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5701751 | Flores | Dec 1997 | A |
5761037 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5815370 | Sutton | Sep 1998 | A |
5818692 | Denney, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829514 | Smith et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841564 | McDunn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862675 | Scaringe et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871043 | Osakabe et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5910160 | Caakmakci et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943211 | Havey et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950717 | Fay | Sep 1999 | A |
5960861 | Price et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018192 | Root et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052284 | Suga et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055154 | Azar | Apr 2000 | A |
6173758 | Ward et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6292364 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297775 | Haws et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305463 | Salmonson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341645 | Tanaka | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347531 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349760 | Budelman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366462 | Chu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397932 | Calaman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415619 | Bash | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6498725 | Cole et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6519148 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519955 | Marsala | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529377 | Somadder et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536516 | Davies et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6594479 | Ammar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603662 | Ganrot | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6679081 | Marsala | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6708511 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729383 | Cannell et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6827135 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6952345 | Weber et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6952346 | Tilton et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957550 | Wyatt et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976527 | Kirshberg et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000691 | Weber | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7254957 | Weber et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20030053298 | Yamada et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062149 | Goodson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030178178 | Breuer et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188858 | Miyazaki | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205363 | Chu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040231351 | Wyatt | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060021736 | Tran | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070119568 | Weber et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119572 | Weber et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 46 750 | Apr 1971 | DE |
103 33 877 | Feb 2005 | DE |
0 243 239 | Apr 1987 | EP |
02 51 836 | May 1987 | EP |
0 817 263 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 666 214 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1 081 759 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 143 778 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1380 799 | May 2003 | EP |
1 381 083 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 448 040 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 519 646 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 601 043 | Nov 2005 | EP |
2 730 556 | Feb 1995 | FR |
1220952 | Mar 1968 | GB |
60 039853 | Mar 1985 | JP |
60136349 | Jul 1985 | JP |
60136349 | Jul 1985 | JP |
04 147657 | May 1992 | JP |
4-316972 | Sep 1992 | JP |
WO 0065890 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0223966 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0242703 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2006072244 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Margaret Ingels, (pp. 59 and 80 of Willis Haviland Carrier “Father of Air Conditioning”, Country Life Press—Garden City (1952). |
Dirk Van Orshoven, “The use of water as a refrigerant—an exploratory investigation”, Thesis University Wisconsin, 1991, pp. I, III-XIII, 1-114. |
“An Integrated Thermal Architecture for Thermal Management of High Power Electronics”, High Power Electronics, http:www.coolingzone.com/Guest/News/NL—JAN—2003/Thermacore/Thermacore Jan. 2003, 22 pages. |
Beaty, et al., “New Guidelines for Data Center Cooling”, Dec. 2003; 8 pages. |
Wilson, et al., “A Thermal Bus System for Cooling Electronic Components in High-Density Cabinets”, 2004 AHSRAE Transactions; Symposia, pp. 567-573. |
Center for the Analysis and Dissemination of Demonstrated Energy Technology (CADDET), Cooling plant at LEGO uses water as refrigerant, Sep. 1997. |
Muller, Norbert, Ph.D. Turbo Chillers using Water as a Refrigerant, Michigan State University, AMSE Process Industry Division PID Newsletter, Fall 2002, p. 3. |
Maab, Jurgen and Feddeck, Paul, BINE Projectinfo, BINE Informationsdienst, Wasser als Kaltemittel, Aug. 2003. |
Kharzi, A., Ph.D., Preliminary Study of a Novel R718 Turbo-Compression Cycle using a 3-port condensing wave rotor, 2004 International ASME Turbo Exposition, ASME Paper GT2004-53622, Austria, Jun. 2004. |
“Subcooled Flow Boiling With Flow Pattern Control” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 1843-1844 Oct. 1, 1979. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/193,571, filed Jul. 11, 2002, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Removing Heat from a Circuit”, 33 pages of text and 3 pages of drawings. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/192,891, filed Jul. 11, 2002 by inventor Richard M. Weber for “Method and Apparatus for Cooling with Coolant at a Subambient Pressure”, 21 pages of text and 2 pages of drawings. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/440,716, filed May 19, 2003 by inventors William Gerald Wyatt and Richard M. Weber for “Method and Apparatus for Extracting Non-Condensable Gases in a Cooling System”, 21 pages of text and 1 drawing sheet. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/853,038, filed May 25, 2004 by inventors Richard M. Weber, et al. for “Method and Apparatus for Controlling Cooling with Coolant at a Subambient Pressure” 25 pages of text and 4 drawing sheets. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/058,691, filed Feb. 15, 2005 by inventors Weber, et al., “Method and Apparatus for Cooling with Coolant at a Subambient Pressure”, 28 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration dated Sep. 27, 2004 for PCT/US2004/015086. |
EPO Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2004 for U.S. Pat. No. 03254283.9-2203; Reference No. JL3846. |
EPO Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2004 for U.S. Pat. No. 03254285.4-2301; Reference No. JL3847. |
EP Search Report dated May 4, 2005 for European Patent Application No. EP 04256509.3. |
EP Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2005 for European Patent Application No. EP 04256509.3-2220. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority or the Declaration Int'l Application No. PCT/US2005/1020544; date of mailing: Oct. 10, 2005; Int'l filing date Jun. 10, 2005; 3 pages. |
“International Search Report”, Int'l Application No. PCT/US2005/020544; Earliest Priority Date: Jun. 14, 2004; Int'l filing date: Jun. 10, 2005; 5 pages. |
“Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Int'l Application No. PCT/US2005/020544; Earliest Priority Date: Jun. 14, 2004; Int'l filing date: Jun. 10, 2005; International Patent Classification:F25B43/04; 9 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/US2007/004146; dated Jul. 31, 2007; 6 pages. |
European Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/008842; 9 pages, Oct. 5, 2007. |
Application Bulletin #16; “Water Purity Requirements in Liquid Cooling Systems;” Jun. 12, 1995; 4 pages. |
European Patent Office Communication, dated Mar. 20, 2008, Reference JL36895P.EPP, 6 pages. |
Kilicarslan, et al., “A comparative study of water as a refrigerant with some current refrigerants”, International Journal of Energy Research, pp. 948-959, 2005. |
Akbari, et al., “Utilizing Wave Rotor Technology to Enhance the Turbo Compression in Power and Refrigeration Cycles”, Proceedings of IMECE'03, 2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering, Nov. 16-21, 2003. |
Kharazi, et al., “Implementation of 3-Port Condensing Wave Rotors in R718 Cycles”, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Dec. 2006, vol. 128, pp. 325-334. |
Karazi, et al. “An Application of Wave Rotor Technology for Performance Enhancement of R718 Refrigeration Cycles”, The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., pp. 965-977. |
Kharazi, et al., “Performance Benefits of R718 Turbo-Compression Cycle Using 3-Port Condensing Wave Rotors”, Proceedings of IMECE04; 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov. 13-20, 2004, pp. 167-176. |
Kharazi, et al., “Preliminary Study of a Novel R718 Turbo-Compression Cycle Using a 3-Port Condensing Wave Rotor”, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo. 2004, Jun. 14-17, 2004. |
Kharazi, et al., “Preliminary Study of a Novel R718 Compression Refrigeration Cycle Using a Three-Port Condensing Wave Rotor”, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Jul. 2005, vol. 127, pp. 539-544. |
Akbari, et al., “A Review of Wave Rotor Technology and Its Applications”, Proceedings of IMEC04, 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov. 13-20, 2004, IMECE2004-60082, pp. 81-103. |
European Search Report and Communication, 06256124.6-1235 / 1793422, 8 pages, dated Apr. 22, 2010. |
European Patent Office Communication, dated Nov. 26, 2008, JL40551P.EPP, 7 pages. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005, in the name of Richard M. Weber, (5 pg), Notification Date Jun. 15, 2007. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005, in the name of Richard M. Weber, (16 pg), Notification Date Sep. 18, 2007. |
USPTO; Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005, in the name of Richard M. Weber, (8 pg), Notification Date Mar. 10, 2008. |
USPTO; Notice of Abandonment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005, in the name of Richard M. Weber, (3 pg), Notification Date Oct. 8, 2008. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber; (8 pg), Notification Date Sep. 18, 2007. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber; (5 pg), Notification Date Jun. 15, 2007. |
USPTO;Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber; (9 pg), Notification Date Mar. 10, 2008. |
USPTO; Notice of Abandonment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber; (2pg), Notification Date Jan. 28, 2009. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel, Weber; (5 pg), Notification Date Jun. 15, 2007. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of of Kerrin A. Rummel; (9 pg), Notification Date Dec. 14, 2007. |
USPTO; Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of of Kerrin A. Rummel; (8 pg), Notification Date Jul. 14, 2008. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of of Kerrin A. Rummel; (5 pg), Notification Date Jan. 12, 2009. |
USPTO; Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of of Kerrin A. Rummel; (10 pg), Notification Date Mar. 11, 2009. |
USPTO; Notice of Abandonment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of of Kerrin A. Rummel; (2 pg), Notification Date Sep. 23, 2009. |
European Patent Office Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; Application No. 07 253 191.6-2301, Ref. JL 40551P.EPP, (5 pgs), Date mailed: Jan. 14, 2011. |
European Patent Office Communication, Munich Germany office action Re: Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, for Application No. 07 253 191.6-2301, Ref. JL40551P.EPP, (5 pgs), Aug. 18, 2011. |
Response to Notice to File Corrected Application Paper; U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005; in the name of Richard M. Weber, et al.; (3 pgs), mailed Feb. 28, 2006. |
Response to Examiner's Election/Restriction Requirement re: OA mailed Jun. 15, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005, in the name of Richard M. Weber, et al.; (2 pgs), filed Jul. 16, 2007. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action re: OA mailed Sep. 18, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,065, filed Nov. 30, 2005, in the name of Richard M. Weber, et al.; (11 pgs), filed Dec. 18, 2007. |
Response to Examiner's Election/Restriction Requirement re: OA mailed Jun. 15, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber, et al.; (2 pgs), filed Jul. 16, 2007. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action re: OA mailed Sep. 18, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber, et al.; (12 pgs), filed Dec. 18, 2007. |
Notice of Appeal, Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review re: OA mailed Mar. 10, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,372, filed Aug. 17, 2006, in the name of Richard M. Weber, et al.; (6 pgs), filed Jun. 10, 2008. |
Response to Examiner's Election/Restriction Requirement re: OA mailed Jun. 15, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel; (4 pgs), filed Aug. 13, 2007. |
Response to Non-Responsive Reply re: OA mailed Aug. 24, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel; (2 pgs), filed Sep. 24, 2007. |
Response to Non-Final Office Action re: OA mailed Dec. 14, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel; (13 pgs), filed Mar. 14, 2008. |
Response to Final Office Action re: OA mailed Jul. 14, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel; (8 pgs), filed Sep. 9, 2008. |
Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Transmittal; U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel; (1 pg), filed Oct. 14, 2008. |
Response to Examiner's Election/Restriction Requirement re: OA mailed Jan. 12, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/420,184, filed May 24, 2006, in the name of Kerrin A. Rummel; (7 pgs), filed Feb. 12, 2009. |
European Search Report and Communication; JL38696P.EPP / 07251481.3-1235 / 1860695; 9 pages, May 20, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090020266 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11465372 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 12208641 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11290065 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11465372 | US |