The present invention is related to solid precursor sources used for the deposition of thin films on substrates. More specifically, the present invention is related to the enhancement of thermal conductivity to the solid precursor inside the precursor source apparatus.
Quite often solid precursors are used for vapor reactants, because liquid or gaseous precursors for a certain element may not be readily available or do not exist at all. Such solid precursors are useful in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, atomic layer deposition (ALD) and other semiconductor fabrication processes. However, it is more difficult to use solid precursors than liquid and gaseous precursors.
Basically, the handling of solid precursors seems to be straightforward. Solid precursor is loaded into a container that is heated to a sufficiently high temperature. The precursor sublimes and the precursor vapor is conducted to a reaction space where it is used for the deposition of thin film on the substrate surface.
Precursor powder generally has rather poor thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity of the precursor bulk may be low and/or there may be empty voids between the precursor particles with little contact surface between the particles, which is undesirable for the conduction of heat energy through the precursor. The volume of the voids depends on the packing density of the precursor powder. At low pressures, heat transport by convection is also generally inefficient, especially when the precursor volume consists of very small voids between the precursor particles. Heat transport by radiation is also generally inefficient because the temperature differences are relatively small and the radiation view factor (line-of-sight paths available for radiant heating) for the bulk of the powder is essentially zero.
When the precursor vessel is heated from outside, the precursor may have a sufficiently high temperature near the vessel walls while the center parts of the precursor powder are insufficiently heated. This temperature differential results from the long period of time required to heat the centrally located portions of the precursor powder in the precursor vessel. In addition, sublimation of the non-centrally located precursor consumes thermal energy, further contributing to the center of the precursor powder volume remaining at a lower temperature than the powder proximate the vessel surfaces throughout the process. During ALD pulsing, this temperature differential can cause the solid source to demonstrate a poor recovery rate after using the precursor source for an extended period, because it becomes more and more difficult to reach an equilibrium state in the gas phase of the precursor vessel. Although ALD processes are relatively insensitive to small drifts in pulse concentration, significant decreases in the recovery rate can cause problems, such as less than full surface coverage of a semiconductor wafer (or other substrate) with the precursor molecules.
Temperature differences inside the precursor vessel lead to the sublimation of the precursor into the gas phase in hotter parts of the vessel volume and to the condensation of the precursor back to the solid phase in cooler parts of the vessel volume. Often the top surface of the precursor seems to be cooler than the rest of the precursor. It has been observed that a hard and dense crust forms over the surface of the heated precursor over time, causing a pulse concentration drift in the process employing the vapor reactant (e.g. ALD). The crust limits the diffusion of precursor molecules from the bulk material to the surface and eventually into the gas phase. The result is a decrease in the observed sublimation rate of the precursor. Initially, the solid precursor source works well but later it is difficult to get a high enough flux of precursor molecules from the source into the reaction chamber, despite the fact that a significant amount of solid precursor remains in the precursor vessel.
Another consideration in sublimation vessel design is that prolonged presence of heated corrosive precursors places heavy demands on those materials in contact with precursors in the precursor vessel.
The preferred embodiments of the invention provide means for improving the uniformity of the source temperature in the whole solid precursor vessel volume. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, inert materials that have high thermal conductivity are mixed with the solid precursor to improve the thermal conductivity through the precursor. For example, the inert materials can comprise particles, fibers, rods, or other elements with high thermal conductivity distributed through the precursor vessel and intermixed with precursor powder.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a method of producing a vapor from a solid precursor for processing a substrate is provided, including placing solid units of precursor into a vessel and interspersing a thermally conductive material through the precursor. The thermally conductive material thereby preferably serves to conduct heat energy throughout the units of precursor. A vapor is then formed through applying heat energy to both the thermally conductive material and the solid units of precursor. In one embodiment, after vapor formation, the vapor is routed from the vessel to a reaction chamber and reacted to deposit a layer on a substrate.
In accordance with another embodiment, a substrate processing system is provided for forming a vapor from a solid precursor by distributing heat throughout the precursor. The provided system comprises a heat conducting vessel configured to hold units of solid precursor, thermally conductive elements being interspersed with the units of solid precursor. A heater is also provided for heating both the precursor and the thermally conductive elements.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, a substrate processing system for forming a vapor from a solid precursor is provided. The system includes a vessel configured to hold units of solid precursor and a microwave generator adjacent to the vessel. The generator is configured to transmit heat energy in the form of microwave energy to effectuate the heating of the precursor.
In accordance with a further embodiment, a mixture for producing a vapor used in substrate processing is provided. The mixture includes a batch of precursor for producing a substrate processing vapor and a plurality of heat transmitting solid forms interspersed through the batch of precursor. The plurality of heat transmitting solid forms collectively increase the thermal conductivity of the batch of precursor.
Advantageously, implementation of the preferred embodiments decreases crust formation at the precursor surface and enhances the sublimation of the precursor. In addition, improving sublimation rate uniformity over the operational life of the precursor batch decreases the amount of unused precursor. Refilling of the precursor vessel is also needed less often due to more efficient material utilization. Another benefit of the present invention is the improvement of the thin film thickness uniformity on substrates by processes employing vapor from the solid precursor by encouraging rapid recovery of the partial pressure of reactant in the gas phase of the vessel to a steady-state value (one such value is P0, the saturation vapor pressure of the material) from pulse-to-pulse.
For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the prior art, certain objects and advantages of the invention have been described herein above. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.
Referring to
In accordance with one preferred embodiment, the insert 38 of
In accordance with the embodiments shown in
In yet other alternate embodiments the thermally conductive elements interspersed with the precursor units can be formed from fixed elements such as, for example, rods, stacked screens, sieves, coils, plates, etc. These units or elements can include both porous and nonporous structures. Preferably, these fixed units or elements are arranged so as to maximize the total amount of thermally conductive surfaces in contact with precursor, while allowing vapor diffusion from the carrier gas inlet to the outlet. Precursor preferably diffuses through the mixture of powder and thermally conductive elements. Preferably, the carrier gas convectively transports the chemical in the upper portion of the vessel (or head space) from the inlet to the outlet.
In an alternate embodiment, a plurality of conductive elements 46 are interspersed with a batch of precursor to form a mixture. Preferably, the inclusion of heat transmitting solid forms collectively increases the thermal conductivity of the batch of precursor.
Referring to
In a preferred operation, microwaves heat the microwave-absorbing material and heat flows from the heated material, which can be in accordance with
In alternate arrangements of the aforementioned embodiments, it should be understood that it is also possible to omit the inert crucible and load the precursor directly into the bottom of the pressure chamber 10; preferably, the pressure chamber 10 surfaces in contact with the precursor are sufficiently inert. A particle filter is also preferably placed on top of the precursor powder or, in an alternate embodiment, in the conduit (not shown in figures) between the precursor source and reaction chamber. In embodiments in which a crucible is employed, the crucible can be formed to have porous walls to serve as a filter, thereby reducing the need for a separate particle filter. In accordance with one preferred embodiment, heat conducting material is then mixed with the precursor, while in another preferred embodiment a machined insert is placed into the chamber prior to, during, or after loading of the precursor into the chamber.
Size and Shape of the Inert Heat Conducting Material
Heat conducting material or thermally conductive elements can be used in different shapes, e.g., powders, fibers, irregular pieces and machined pieces.
The grain size of inert powders is selected according to the application, as would be appreciated by the skilled artisan. Precursor source vessels that do not include any particle filters should preferably be filled with conductive, inert elements (e.g., SiC powder) that are coarse enough to prevent the dusting of the material. Precursor source vessels equipped with a filter can be filled with a wide range of conductor particle size; preferably the smallest particles are stopped by the particle filter. One benefit of using small inert, conductive particles is that very small voids in the precursor powder can be filled and the packing density and the heat conductivity through the precursor volume is increased. One goal of certain preferred embodiments is to provide uniform and high heat conductivity through the precursor powder.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the mixture of conductive elements and precursor has a heat conductivity lower than that of pure conductor material and higher than that of pure precursor. For example, inert heat conducting material is added to the solid precursor forming a solid mixture, so that there is preferably about 10-80% by volume of heat conducting material in the precursor/conductor mixture and, more preferably, about 30-60% by volume of heat conducting material in the mixture. Re-use of the conductor, although possible, is a challenge, especially when the particle size of the conductor is very small.
In another embodiment, fibers of inert, conductive material, such as carbides or carbon, are employed. Fibers preferably conduct heat efficiently along the fibers through the precursor volume and, also, donate heat to the precursor that is located near the fibers. The fibers are preferably cut into pieces that have a length of about 1-20 mm and are mixed with the aforementioned precursor. For example, suitable SiC fibers are sold, e.g., by Reade Advanced Materials, USA. The heat conducting fibers selected preferably distribute heat from the heater or the precursor vessel walls to the precursor.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, machined pieces of inert, conductive material are used, thereby preferably allowing certain benefits. By employing larger machined pieces, recovery of heat conducting material is relatively easy after use. In addition, the heat conducting material can be cleaned and reused many times. Accordingly, very high purity and expensive heat conducting material can be used economically. Machined pieces can take the form of, for example, rods and plates (as illustrated in
One embodiment employs a combination of machined pieces and smaller heat conducting pieces. Machined pieces preferably effectuate long-distance heat transport from the heater or heated walls of the precursor vessel deep into the precursor volume, while loose heat conducting units (e.g., beads, powder, fibers, etc.) are preferably mixed with the precursor to effectuate the local distribution of heat to the precursor. In one arrangement, heat conducting material in the form of powder is employed in combination with heat conducting material in the form of fibers. In another arrangement, rods are employed in conjunction with a powdered heat conducting material. In view of the disclosure contained herein, the skilled artisan will readily recognize other combinations of heat conducting material forms and materials that would also be advantageous.
In selecting the added inert material that is used according to the present invention, good thermal conductivity is desirable. Inert materials for this purpose preferably have a thermal conductivity of at least about 50 W/m*K, more preferably at least about 80 W/m*K, for the applications presented in this patent application at room temperature, and most preferably have such high conductivity under the conditions of use.
Silicon Carbide
Silicon carbide (SiC) is employed in certain preferred embodiments to form the inert material which is added to the crucible or vessel. SiC is an extremely hard material that has high thermal conductivity, negligible vapor pressure and very good resistance against chemicals at elevated temperatures. According to Performance Materials, Inc., USA, the thermal conductivity of SiC is 250 W/m*K at room temperature and about 120 W/m*K at 400° C. A wide range of SiC grades with different purities are commercially available. The color of silicon carbide (SiC) is known to correlate with its purity. According to Reade Advanced Materials, USA, black SiC has a purity of up to about 99.2%, dark green SiC has a purity of about 99.5% and the purity of light green SiC is about 99.7%. SiC is available in the form of powder, grit, crystals, granules, wafers, fibers, platelets, bars and arbitrary form pieces. Typical impurities in SiC that is produced from silica sand and coke are SiO2, elemental Si, free C, and Fe2O3. Preferably, such impurities are minimized to decrease potential contamination of the process employing the precursor. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, the inert conductive material is preferably greater than 99% pure.
A number of commercial sources of high purity SiC exist. For example, SiC of 99% purity is available from Atlantic Equipment Engineers, USA, in all grit sizes. Poco Graphite, Inc., USA, also produces very high purity SiC with a Chemical Vapour Infiltration (CVI) method where pure graphite is contacted with silicon monoxide (SiO) vapor (Eq. 1). The amount of impurities in SiC is in the ppm level.
SiO(g)+2C----->SiC+CO(g) Eq. 1
Cerac, Inc., USA, sells vacuum deposition grade (99.5%) SiC pieces that have dimensions in the range of 3-12 mm.
Other Materials
A number of other suitable inert carbides are commercially available. The thermal conductivity of transition metal carbides is typically about 50% lower than the thermal conductivity of SiC; the conductivity of transitions metal carbides will often be sufficient to provide improved sublimation. Atlantic Equipment Engineers, USA, sells powders of tungsten carbide (WC), vanadium carbide (VC), tantalum carbide (TaC), zirconium carbide (ZrC), hafnium carbide (HfC), molybdenum carbide (MoC), niobium carbide (NbC) and titanium carbide (TiC). The purity of the carbide powder is typically 99.8-99.9%. Such metal carbides may also have useful metal-carbon stoichiometries other than 1:1.
In addition, alternate carbides, such as boron carbides (e.g., B4C) that have sufficiently high thermal conductivity can also be employed; boron carbides are preferably not used for applications that are sensitive to boron impurities.
Another suitably inert and conductive material is PocoFoam™, manufactured by Poco Graphite, USA, which is very light carbon foam and has a thermal conductivity in the 100 to 150 W/m*K range.
Coated Materials
In selecting a material from which to form the heat conducting material, it is undesirable to utilize materials that have high heat conductivity but have a property that, unmodified, prevents the direct use of the material in solid precursor vessels. For example, a potential material may have a desirable thermal conductivity, but the material reacts with the precursor during processing, i.e., during sublimation. Therefore, the material which is chosen to directly contact the precursor is preferably inert. Certain preferred embodiments allow the use of material that if used alone would be undesirable, by coating a non-inert material having a high thermal conductivity with an inert substance. For example, both graphite and silicon are good conductors of heat. Graphite is very soft and easily forms solid particles that may contaminate substrates in a reaction chamber. A hard inert coating is thus preferably formed on the graphite surface to decrease the number of particles released from the graphite. Similarly, silicon is an efficient reducing agent if the native oxide on the silicon surface is broken. An inert coating deposited on the silicon surface preferably prevents the reactions between the silicon and precursors.
In particular, graphite or silicon can, in certain preferred embodiments, be coated with SiC. Other suitable coating materials are boron carbides, niobium carbide (NbC), tantalum carbide (TaC), titanium carbide (TiC), tungsten carbide (WC), zirconium carbide (ZrC), molybdenum carbide (MoC), vanadium carbide (VC) and hafnium carbide (HfC). Such metal carbides may also have useful stoichiometries other than 1:1. In one embodiment, insufficiently pure carbides are preferably coated with a thin, high-purity CVD carbide film that prevents the contamination of the precursor in the precursor vessel. In this embodiment, impurities of the CVD carbide coatings are in the parts per million (ppm) range and, thus, do not significantly contaminate precursors or substrates. Transition metal nitrides, such as niobium nitride (NbN), tantalum nitride (TaN), titanium nitride (TiN), tungsten nitride (WN), zirconium nitride (ZrN), molybdenum nitride (MoN), vanadium nitride (VN) and hafnium nitride (HfN), serve as further examples of suitable inert coatings on heat conducting materials. In addition, in one embodiment, silicon nitride is formed on the silicon surface and, thus, silicon parts and pieces are passivated.
The following examples, including the methods performed and results achieved are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting upon the present invention.
A Pulsar® 3000 ALCVD™ reactor, available commercially from ASM International, N.V. of Bilthoven, The Netherlands, was used for the deposition of HfO2 from alternating pulses of HfCl4 and H2O via sequential, self-saturating surface reactions. The HfCl4 vapor for those pulses was provided from a solid source. A mixture of 157.6 g of HfCl4 and 200.8 g of 99.5% SiC (obtained from Orkla Exolon, Norway) was loaded into a source container. In the mixture there was approximately 100 cm3 of each precursor. Thus, the mixture of precursor material and conductive elements was a 1:1 volumetric mixture.
As a result, the source temperature could be lowered from 200-205° C. (no carbide fill) to 180° C. (with carbide fill). It is believed that the recovery rate (i.e., time after pulsing that sufficient vapor develops for the next pulse) of the source improved because of the increased and more stable sublimation rate of the precursor. The deposition of thin films from the same precursor batch was made possible for a longer time than without the carbide fill. The addition of SiC improved the HfO2 thin film thickness uniformity on the substrates. Use of SiC conductive filler did not affect the number of particles on wafers.
ZrCl4 powder was mixed with boron carbide (B4C) powder in a glove box. The mixture was loaded into a source boat made of glass. The source boat with the mixture was then placed in a glass tube to serve as a carrier tube. Ends of the tube were covered with Parafilm to prevent the exposure of ZrCl4 to room air and moisture. The tube was carried from the glove box to an F120 ALD reactor from ASM International N.V., and the source boat was moved from the carrier tube to a source tube (pressure vessel) of the reactor while inert nitrogen gas was flowing out of the source tube. After the loading of the source boat was completed and substrates were placed into the reaction chamber of the reactor, the reactor was evacuated to vacuum with a mechanical vacuum pump. Pressure of the reactor was adjusted to about 3-10 mbar with flowing inert nitrogen gas. The reaction chamber was heated to the deposition temperature and the ZrCl4 reactant zone of the reactor was heated also to the sublimation temperature. ZrO2 thin film was deposited from sequential alternating pulses of ZrCl4 and H2O vapor. It was found that the sublimation rate of ZrCl4 increased clearly when boron carbide had been mixed with ZrCl4. Boron carbide helped to transport heat energy through the precursor volume.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications thereof. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
The present application claims priority to and is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/170,801, filed Jul. 10, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,851,019, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/463,309, filed Jun. 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,601,225, which is a non-provisional of U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 60/389,528, filed on Jun. 17, 2002, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. The present application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,085, issued on Oct. 17, 2006, entitled “Sublimation Bed Employing Carrier Gas Guidance Structures,” which claims priority from Provisional Application No. 60/400,210, filed Jul. 30, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
87192 | Paine | Feb 1869 | A |
113147 | Dupas et al. | Mar 1871 | A |
160410 | Ferguson | Mar 1875 | A |
230656 | Radkey | Aug 1880 | A |
1103789 | Macey | Jul 1914 | A |
1525786 | Waldo | Feb 1925 | A |
1860111 | Miller | May 1932 | A |
2206688 | Bloomheart | Jul 1940 | A |
2333898 | Stevenson et al. | Nov 1943 | A |
2447789 | Barr | Aug 1948 | A |
2738762 | Pawlyk | Mar 1956 | A |
3569672 | Hurko | Mar 1971 | A |
3849077 | Becuwe | Nov 1974 | A |
3912795 | Jackson | Oct 1975 | A |
3957467 | Kim | May 1976 | A |
3989477 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4221182 | Brown | Sep 1980 | A |
4268279 | Shindo et al. | May 1981 | A |
4297971 | Henery | Nov 1981 | A |
4314128 | Chitre | Feb 1982 | A |
4351861 | Henery | Sep 1982 | A |
4389973 | Suntola et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4393013 | McMenamin | Jul 1983 | A |
4436674 | McMenamin | Mar 1984 | A |
4548138 | Korenberg | Oct 1985 | A |
4585673 | Sigai | Apr 1986 | A |
4610859 | Miyagawa et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4683541 | David | Jul 1987 | A |
4684542 | Jasinski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4747367 | Posa | May 1988 | A |
4761269 | Conger et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4774032 | Coates et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4783343 | Sato | Nov 1988 | A |
4828224 | Crabb et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834020 | Bartholomew | May 1989 | A |
4844949 | Arai et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4849259 | Biro et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883362 | Gartner et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4891103 | Zorinsky et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904419 | Reynolds | Feb 1990 | A |
4911101 | Ballingall et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4947790 | Gartner et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5053132 | Sirkar | Oct 1991 | A |
5084089 | Zekely et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5143526 | Lee et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5171734 | Sanjurjo et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5204314 | Kirlin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5221556 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227329 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5272880 | Nishizato et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5385689 | Tom et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389570 | Shiozawa | Feb 1995 | A |
5536323 | Kirlin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543043 | Bates et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551278 | Rounbehler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5553395 | Wen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5674574 | Atwell et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5698037 | Stauffer | Dec 1997 | A |
5711816 | Kirlin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719417 | Roeder et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5786027 | Rolfson | Jul 1998 | A |
5822991 | Pierzchala et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5862605 | Horie et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876503 | Roeder et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904771 | Tasaki et al. | May 1999 | A |
5989305 | Ohsaki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015590 | Suntola et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6033493 | Hertz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039894 | Sanjurjo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082714 | Dornfest et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093252 | Wengert et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096134 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120640 | Shih et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132492 | Hultquist et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6178925 | Sturm et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6231641 | Utigard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244331 | Budelman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244575 | Vaartstra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251233 | Plester et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258170 | Somekh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270839 | Onoe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6325017 | DeBoer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6409839 | Sun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6470833 | Hyppanen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6582496 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586046 | Ackerman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589868 | Rossman | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6640840 | MacNeil | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6699524 | Kesälä | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718126 | Lei | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720259 | Londergan et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6783590 | Lindfors et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6905541 | Chen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906296 | Centanni et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921062 | Gregg et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7108747 | Leskelä et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7122085 | Shero et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156380 | Soininen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186385 | Ganguli et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7253084 | Todd et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7270709 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7497420 | Soininen | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7601225 | Tuominen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7851019 | Tuominen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010042523 | Kesala | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020168868 | Todd | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020197831 | Todd et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012873 | Hirono et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053799 | Lei | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030082300 | Todd et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030175650 | De Ridder et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040016404 | Gregg et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040173336 | Graham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050000428 | Shero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050039794 | Birtcher et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050079692 | Samoilov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060110930 | Senzaki | May 2006 | A1 |
20060216419 | Shero et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20110076402 | Tuominen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 39 625 | Jan 1991 | DE |
2 151 662 | Jul 1985 | GB |
1-265511 | Oct 1989 | JP |
08-299778 | Nov 1996 | JP |
011 168 092 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2002-359238 | Dec 2002 | JP |
WO 02064853 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2004011695 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2007057631 | May 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110076402 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60389528 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12170801 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12964222 | US | |
Parent | 10463309 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 12170801 | US |