Systems and methods for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10585804
  • Patent Number
    10,585,804
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 7, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 10, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions are disclosed. As a part of a method, data is accessed that is received in a write-back data holding buffer from a cache flushing operation, the data is flagged with a processor identifier and a serialization flag, and responsive to the flagging, the cache is notified that the cache flush is completed. Subsequent to the notifying, access is provided to data then present in the write-back data holding buffer to determine if data then present in the write-back data holding buffer is flagged.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Modern microprocessors operate much faster than associated memories where program data is kept. In particular, main memories operate much slower than do modern microprocessors. Because of this, program data may not be able to be read fast enough to keep a microprocessor busy. Moreover, the performance gap creates a bottleneck that is the source of latency. Cache memory is used to help ameliorate the performance gap that exists between processors and main memory. Cache memory is memory that is smaller in storage capacity than main memory, but is memory that can be accessed much more quickly than can main memory.


As such, cache memory is used by the central processing unit of a computer to reduce the time that it takes to access data and instructions associated with the execution of an application. Cache memory is small, high speed memory, usually static RAM, which stores copies of data and instructions accessed from the most recently used main memory locations. As long as data and instructions are accessed from cached memory locations, the latency associated with data and instruction accesses is that of cache memory accesses as opposed to being that of main memory accesses, which are much slower. Cache memory improves latency by decreasing the time that it takes to move information to and from the processor.


Cache flushing is the intentional removal of information from a cache. Individual modified or dirty cache lines can be evicted from a cache and written into main memory in an operation called a write-back. The write-back updates the version of the cache line that is stored in main memory. A writeback may result from actions in either hardware or software. If the write-back was initiated by software, as a result of the execution of a cache flush instruction, after the processor finishes the write-backs, it then generates a special bus cycle called a flush acknowledge cycle.


In conventional processors, when a flush of data from a cache is requested, the processor is stalled until the flush of data to main memory or the next level of cache is completed. As such, latency that is attributable to the period during which the processor waits for the write backs to complete is incurred. Accordingly, some conventional processors exhibit an unsatisfactory latency that is attributable to the waiting period that is associated with writebacks to main memory (or other locations).


SUMMARY

Conventional processors exhibit an unsatisfactory latency that is attributable to the waiting period that is associated with data write-backs. A method for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions is disclosed that addresses these shortcomings. However, the claimed embodiments are not limited to implementations that address any or all of the aforementioned shortcomings. As a part of a method, data is accessed that is received in a write-back data holding buffer from a cache flushing operation, the data is flagged with a processor identifier and a serialization flag, and responsive to the flagging, the processor executing the cache flush instruction is prematurely/expediently notified that the cache flush operation is completed. Subsequent to such notification, access is provided to data then present in the write-back data holding buffer to determine if data then present in the writeback data holding buffer is flagged. The aforementioned methodology does not require a waiting period during which the processor waits (e.g., is stalled) for write-backs to complete. Accordingly, the aforementioned methodology avoids unsatisfactory latency that is attributable to the waiting period that is associated with data flushes in conventional processors.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention, together with further advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1A shows an exemplary operating environment of a system for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1B shows how the data that is temporarily held in the data holding buffer is tagged and thereafter an indicator that the data has been completely flushed to a main memory/next level cache/private memory of a device is provided to L2 cache.



FIG. 1C illustrates how the flagging of data enables data associated with a specific processor core and a specific cache flush to be distinguished from other data that is associated with other processor cores and cache flushes that can be extant on a chip.



FIG. 1D illustrates operations performed by system for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2 shows components of a system for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of the steps performed in a method for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment.





It should be noted that like reference numbers refer to like elements in the figures.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Although the present invention has been described in connection with one embodiment, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific forms set forth herein. On the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can be reasonably included within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


In the following detailed description, numerous specific details such as specific method orders, structures, elements, and connections have been set forth. It is to be understood however that these and other specific details need not be utilized to practice embodiments of the present invention. In other circumstances, well-known structures, elements, or connections have been omitted, or have not been described in particular detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring this description.


References within the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” are intended to indicate that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. The appearance of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places within the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.


Some portions of the detailed descriptions, which follow, are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals of a computer readable storage medium and are capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.


It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “receiving” or “accessing” or “flagging” or “notifying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories and other computer readable media into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.


Exemplary Operating Environment of a System for Non-Blocking Implementation of Cache Flush Instructions According to One Embodiment


FIG. 1A shows an exemplary operating environment 100 of a system 101 for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment. System 101 accesses data received by a writeback data holding buffer as a result of software initiated cache flushing operations, flags the data and notifies the cache that a write-back of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device has completed before the write-back of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device has actually completed. Subsequently, access to the write-back data holding buffer is provided to a serialization operation to determine if data that is then present in the write-back data holding buffer has been flagged. System 101 enables an efficient flushing of L2 cache, such that processor stalls, that are attributable to a necessity to wait for write-backs to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device to complete, before making L2 cache available for new/fresh data, are prevented. FIG. 1A shows system 101, cache controller 102, L1 cache 103, CPU 105, L2 cache 107, WDHB (write-back data holding buffer) 109, main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111 and system interface 113.


Referring to FIG. 1A, L1 cache 103 is a level 1 cache and L2 cache 107 is a level 2 cache. In one embodiment, when a software based request is made to flush modified data from L2 cache 107, a copy of the modified data is written back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111, replacing the old data located therein. In one embodiment, when a request to flush data from L2 cache 107 is made the data is flushed from L2 cache 107 into WDHB 109. In one embodiment, an indicator that the data has been flushed to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111 is provided to L2 cache 107 when the data is flushed into WDHB 109. The processor is then freed to receive new/fresh instructions that are needed by the software executing on the processor. In this manner, because requests to flush data typically involve blocking instructions, the blocking instruction is removed and the processor is not forced to wait until the write-back of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device is actually completed before it can resume processing new requests. In conventional systems, it can take several hundred cycles for flushed data to reach main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111. Accordingly, in exemplary embodiments, processor stalls that are attributable to such delays are avoided.


WDHB 109 receives data that is flushed from L2 cache 107 based on a software based request to flush the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device. WDHB 109 is a temporary data holding buffer that temporarily holds data that is in the process of being flushed from L2 cache 107 to main memory/next level cache/private memory of a device 111. In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1B, the flushed data that is temporarily held in WDHB 109 is flagged (e.g., with a processor identifier and a serialization flag). And, thereafter an indicator that the data has been completely flushed to main memory/next level cache/private memory of a device 111 is provided to L2 cache 107 (e.g., a write-back acknowledgement is provided to L2 cache 107 in response to the flagging and before the data is actually written back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of a device).


In one embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 1C, the flagging enables data associated with a specific processor core (e.g., one of P0-P3) and a specific flush (e.g., one of CF0-CF3) to be distinguished from other data in WDHB 109 that is associated with other processor cores and flushes that can be extant on a chip. In this manner a serialization operation (e.g., one of SI0-SI3) can readily identify data held in WDHB 109 that is associated with a corresponding processor core and data flush request, and can operate to block the execution of subsequent instructions in the software that includes the serialization instruction, until the write-back of the identified data is completed. In one embodiment, because the execution of the instructions that are executed, after the flush request is executed, and before the serialization instruction is executed, can take many cycles, the data that is caused to be flushed by a flush request is typically already written back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of a device 111 at the point in time when the serialization instruction is executed (see flushed data P0, CF0 in FIG. 1C); the data that is temporarily held in WDHB 109 having been forwarded to main memory/next level cache/private memory of a device 111 when the forwarding of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device is approved by the interconnect fabric.


Referring again to FIG. 1A, system 101 accesses data that is received by WDHB 109 as a result of a cache flushing operation (as illustrated in FIG. 1B). The data that is placed into WDHB 109 is flagged by system 101 with a processor identifier and a serialization flag (as illustrated in FIG. 1B). Prior to the completion of the flush of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device and responsive to the flagging of the data, a cache completion indicator is provided by system 101 to L2 cache 107 (as illustrated in FIG. 1B). Subsequently, system 101 provides access to data held in WDHB 109 to determine if data that is then present therein is flagged (see above discussion). In one embodiment, system 101 can be located in cache controller 102. In other embodiments, system 101 can be separate from cache controller 102 but operate cooperatively therewith.


Main Memory/Next Level Cache/Private Memory of Device 111 stores data that is flushed from L2 cache 107 to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111 via WDHB 109. Having been placed into WDH B 109 to avoid blocking the ingress of data into L2 cache 107, data is moved to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111 when the interconnect fabric authorizes the forwarding of the data from WDHB 109. The data that is flushed to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device from L2 cache 107 updates the data that is stored in the involved address of main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111. Also shown in FIG. 1A is system interface 113.


Operation


FIG. 1D illustrates operations performed by system 101 for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment. These operations, which relate to the implementation of cache flush instructions are illustrated for purposes of clarity and brevity. It should be appreciated that other operations not illustrated by FIG. 1D can be performed in accordance with one embodiment.


Referring to FIG. 1D, at A, a software based cache flush request is made. In one embodiment, the software based cache flush request is implemented as an instruction that is a part of the software. In one embodiment, the instruction causes the flushing of modified data from L2 cache 107 that is to be written back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111.


At B, data is flushed from L2 cache 107 and forwarded to WDHB 109. In one embodiment, WDHB 109 has an 8 entry data holding capacity. In other embodiments, WDHB 109 can have other data holding capacities.


At C, system 101 accesses the data that is received by WDHB 109 and flags the data with a processor identifier and a serialization flag. In one embodiment, the processor identifier and the serialization flag refer to a specific processor and a specific cache flush.


At D, responsive to the flagging of the data, L2 cache 107 is notified that the cache flush has been completed (that the data has been written back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111). In one embodiment, L2 cache 107 is notified that that the cache flush has been completed, in response to the flagging of the data and before the data is actually written-back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111.


At E, the data that is flushed from L2 cache 107 is written-back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device 111. At F, access to the contents of the write-back data holding buffer is provided to a serialization instruction in the software program that initiated the cache flush request. The serialization instruction ensures that the write-back of data is completed before subsequent instructions in the software program can be executed. The serialization operation uses the flags to identify data held in WDHB 109 that is associated with a specific processor core and data flush request, and blocks the execution of subsequent instructions, until the write-back of the identified data is completed.


Components of System for Non-Blocking Implementation of Cache Flush Instructions According to One Embodiment


FIG. 2 shows components of a system 101 for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment. In one embodiment, components of system 101 implement an algorithm for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions. In the FIG. 2 embodiment, components of system 101 include data accessor 201, data flagger 203, cache notifier 205 and access provider 207.


Referring to FIG. 2, data accessor 201 accesses data that is received by a write-back data holding buffer (e.g., WDHB 109 in FIG. 1A) as part of a cache flushing operation. In one embodiment, the data is that is received is received from L2 cache (e.g., 107 in FIG. 1A) en route to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device (e.g., 111 in FIG. 1A). In one embodiment, the write-back data holding buffer temporarily holds the data until the interconnect fabric indicates that the data that is being temporarily held in the write-back holding buffer can be forwarded onward.


Data flagger 203 flags the data that is flushed to the write-back data holding buffer with a processor identifier and a serialization flag. In one embodiment, the flagging enables data associated with a specific processor core and a specific flush to be identified from among other data associated with various other processor cores and flushes that are extant on a chip.


Cache notifier 205, responsive to the flagging, notifies L2 cache that a flush of the flagged data has been completed (e.g., that the data has been written back to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device). In one embodiment, the notification is provided to L2 cache prior to the completion of the flush of the flagged data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device.


Access provider 207, after a cache flush completion notification is provided to the cache, provides access to the data that is then present in the write-back holding buffer, such that it can be determined if the data then present in the write-back data holding buffer is flagged. In one embodiment, access is provided to a serialization instruction, which determines if any of the data then present in the write-back data holding buffer is flagged.


It should be appreciated that the aforementioned components of system 101 can be implemented in hardware or software or in a combination of both. In one embodiment, components and operations of system 101 can be encompassed by components and operations of one or more computer components or operations (e.g., cache controller 102 in FIG. 1A). In another embodiment, components and operations of system 101 can be separate from the aforementioned one or more computer components or operations but can operate cooperatively with components and operations thereof.


Method for Non-Blocking Implementation of a Cache Flush Instruction According to One Embodiment


FIG. 3 shows a flowchart 300 of the steps performed in a method for non-blocking implementation of cache flush instructions according to one embodiment. The flowchart includes processes that, in one embodiment can be carried out by processors and electrical components under the control of computer-readable and computer-executable instructions. Although specific steps are disclosed in the flowcharts, such steps are exemplary. That is the present embodiment is well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited in the flowchart.


Referring to FIG. 3, at 301, a cache flush request is made and data is flushed to a write-back data holding buffer as a part of cache flushing operations. In one embodiment, the cache flush request is made by a software program that seeks to flush modified data from L2 cache.


At 303, data is accessed that is received by a write-back data holding buffer as a part of the cache flushing operation.


At 305, the flushed data is flagged with a processor identifier and a serialization flag. In one embodiment, as described herein, the flagging enables data associated with a specific processor core and a specific flush to be distinguished from among other data associated with various other processor cores and flushes that can be extant on a chip.


At 307, the L2 cache is notified that a write-back of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device has been completed (that the flush of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device is completed) prior to the actual completion of the write-back of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device. In one embodiment, the cache is notified that a write-back of the data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device has been completed in response to the flagging of the data.


At 309, subsequent to notifying the L2 cache that a write-back of the flagged data to main memory/next level cache/private memory of device has been completed, access is provided to data then present in the write-back holding buffer to determine if the data then present in the write-back data holding buffer has been flagged.


With regard to exemplary embodiments thereof, systems and methods for efficient cache flushing are disclosed. As a part of a method, data is accessed that is received in a write-back data holding buffer from a cache flushing operation, the data is flagged with a processor identifier and a serialization flag, and responsive to the flagging, the cache is notified that the cache flush is completed. Subsequent to the notifying, access is provided to data then present in the write-back data holding buffer to determine if data then present in the write-back data holding buffer is flagged.


Although many of the components and processes are described above in the singular for convenience, it will be appreciated by one of skill in the art that multiple components and repeated processes can also be used to practice the techniques of the present invention. Further, while the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in the form and details of the disclosed embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. For example, embodiments of the present invention may be employed with a variety of components and should not be restricted to the ones mentioned above. It is therefore intended that the invention be interpreted to include all variations and equivalents that fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for non-blocking implementation of a cache flushing operation by a cache controller, comprising: signaling a write-back data holding buffer to flag data flushed by a cache with an identifier for a processor that initiated the cache flushing operation to flush the data from the cache; andnotifying the cache that the cache flushing operation is complete before the data is written back to a memory.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cache flushing operation is a software based cache flushing operation.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: enabling access to the data in the write-back holding buffer to enable a check for serialization flag by a serialization operation.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: signaling the write-back data holding buffer to flag the data flushed by the cache with a serialization flag.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the serialization flag identifies a specific cache flushing operation associated with the processor identifier.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: over-writing the data in the cache after flushed from the cache and before the data is written back to the memory.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the notifying is performed before an execution of a serialization instruction in software that initiated the cache flushing operation.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the processor identifier identifies a specific processor core among a plurality of processor cores of the processor.
  • 9. A method to support non-blocking implementation of a cache flushing operation by a write-back data holding buffer, the method comprising: receiving, by the write-back data holding buffer, data from a cache in response to the cache flushing operation;flagging data flushed by a cache with a serialization flag indicating a specific cache flush; andenabling access to an initiator of the cache flushing operation to check the serialization flag.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the cache flushing operation is a software based cache flushing operation.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, further comprising: receiving a processor identifier from a cache controller to associate with the data.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 wherein the processor identifier identifies a specific processor core among a plurality of processor cores of the processor.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, further comprising: over-writing the data in the cache after flushed from the cache and before the data is written back to a memory.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, wherein the serialization flag identifies a specific cache flushing operation associated with a specific processor or processing core.
  • 15. A device to support non-blocking cache flushing operations, the device comprising: a memory device for long term data storage;a processor to initiate a cache flushing operation;an interconnect to enable communication between the processor and memory device;a cache coupled to the processor to hold data;a write-back data holding buffer (WDHB) coupled to the cache, the WDHB to hold the data in response to the cache flushing operation; anda cache controller coupled to the cache, the processor and the WDHB, the cache controller to signal a write-back data holding buffer to flag data flushed by the cache with an identifier for the processor, and to notify the cache that the cache flushing operation is complete before the data is written to the memory.
  • 16. The device of claim 15, wherein the cache flushing operation is a software based cache flushing operation.
  • 17. The device of claim 15, wherein the cache controller is configured to enable access to the data in the write-back holding buffer to enable a check for serialization flag by a serialization operation.
  • 18. The device of claim 15, wherein the cache controller is configured to signal the write-back data holding buffer to flag the data flushed by the cache with a serialization flag.
  • 19. The device of claim 18 wherein the serialization flag identifies a specific cache flushing operation associated with the processor identifier.
  • 20. The device of claim 15, wherein the cache controller is configured to over-write the data in the cache after flushed from the cache and before the data is written back to the memory.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 15/003,486, filed Jan. 21, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,842,056, issued Dec. 12, 2017), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/649,532, filed Oct. 11, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,678,882, issued Jun. 13, 2017), which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (178)
Number Name Date Kind
4075704 O'Leary Feb 1978 A
4245344 Richter Jan 1981 A
4356550 Katzman et al. Oct 1982 A
4414624 Summer, Jr. et al. Nov 1983 A
4524415 Mills, Jr. et al. Jun 1985 A
4527237 Frieder et al. Jul 1985 A
4577273 Hopper et al. Mar 1986 A
4597061 Cline et al. Jun 1986 A
4600986 Scheuneman et al. Jul 1986 A
4633434 Scheuneman Dec 1986 A
4682281 Woffinden et al. Jul 1987 A
4816991 Watanabe et al. Mar 1989 A
4920477 Colwell et al. Apr 1990 A
5294897 Notani et al. Mar 1994 A
5317705 Gannon et al. May 1994 A
5317754 Blandy et al. May 1994 A
5548742 Wang et al. Aug 1996 A
5559986 Alpert et al. Sep 1996 A
5574878 Onodera et al. Nov 1996 A
5634068 Nishtala et al. May 1997 A
5752260 Liu May 1998 A
5754818 Mohamed May 1998 A
5758166 Ajanovic May 1998 A
5787243 Stiffler Jul 1998 A
5787494 Delano et al. Jul 1998 A
5793941 Pencis et al. Aug 1998 A
5802602 Rahman et al. Sep 1998 A
5806085 Berliner Sep 1998 A
5809524 Singh Sep 1998 A
5813031 Chou et al. Sep 1998 A
5835951 McMahan Nov 1998 A
5852738 Bealkowski et al. Dec 1998 A
5860146 Vishin et al. Jan 1999 A
5864657 Stiffler Jan 1999 A
5872985 Kimura Feb 1999 A
5881277 Bondi et al. Mar 1999 A
5903750 Yeh et al. May 1999 A
5905509 Jones et al. May 1999 A
5918251 Yamada et al. Jun 1999 A
5956753 Glew et al. Sep 1999 A
5974506 Sicola et al. Oct 1999 A
6016533 Tran Jan 2000 A
6073230 Pickett et al. Jun 2000 A
6075938 Bugnion et al. Jun 2000 A
6088780 Yamada et al. Jul 2000 A
6092172 Nishimoto et al. Jul 2000 A
6101577 Tran Aug 2000 A
6115809 Mattson, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6134634 Marshall, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6138226 Yoshioka et al. Oct 2000 A
6157998 Rupley, II et al. Dec 2000 A
6167490 Levy et al. Dec 2000 A
6205545 Shah et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212613 Belair Apr 2001 B1
6226732 Pei et al. May 2001 B1
6247097 Sinharoy Jun 2001 B1
6253316 Tran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256727 McDonald Jul 2001 B1
6256728 Witt et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260131 Kikuta et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260138 Harris Jul 2001 B1
6272662 Jadav et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275917 Okada Aug 2001 B1
6321298 Hubis Nov 2001 B1
6332189 Baweja et al. Dec 2001 B1
6341324 Caulk, Jr. et al. Jan 2002 B1
6437789 Tidwell et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442700 Cooper Aug 2002 B1
6449671 Patkar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457120 Sinharoy Sep 2002 B1
6557083 Sperber et al. Apr 2003 B1
6594755 Nuechterlein et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604187 McGrath et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609189 Kuszmaul et al. Aug 2003 B1
6658549 Wilson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6681395 Nishi Jan 2004 B1
6907600 Neiger et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912644 O'Connor et al. Jun 2005 B1
7007108 Emerson et al. Feb 2006 B2
7111145 Chen et al. Sep 2006 B1
7143273 Miller et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149872 Rozas et al. Dec 2006 B2
7213106 Koster et al. May 2007 B1
7278030 Chen et al. Oct 2007 B1
7380096 Rozas et al. May 2008 B1
7406581 Southwell et al. Jul 2008 B2
7546420 Shar et al. Jun 2009 B1
7680988 Nickolls et al. Mar 2010 B1
7783868 Ukai Aug 2010 B2
7856530 Mu Dec 2010 B1
7913058 Rozas et al. Mar 2011 B2
8145844 Bruce Mar 2012 B2
8239656 Rozas et al. Aug 2012 B2
8301847 Dantzig et al. Oct 2012 B2
8522253 Rozas et al. Aug 2013 B1
8868838 Glasco et al. Oct 2014 B1
8930674 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2015 B2
9047178 Talagala et al. Jun 2015 B2
20010049782 Hsu et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020069326 Richardson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082824 Neiger et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099913 Steely et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030028737 Kaiya et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065887 Maiyuran et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088752 Harman May 2003 A1
20040034762 Kacevas Feb 2004 A1
20040044850 George et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064668 Kjos et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093483 Nguyen et al. May 2004 A1
20040117441 Liu et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117593 Uhlig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117594 Vanderspek Jun 2004 A1
20040143727 McDonald Jul 2004 A1
20040193857 Miller et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040205296 Bearden Oct 2004 A1
20040215886 Cargnoni et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225872 Bonanno et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050005085 Miyanaga Jan 2005 A1
20050027961 Zhang Feb 2005 A1
20050027972 Harrington Feb 2005 A1
20050044320 Olukotun Feb 2005 A1
20050060457 Olukotun Mar 2005 A1
20050108480 Correale, Jr. et al. May 2005 A1
20050154867 Dewitt et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060004964 Conti et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015689 Okawa Jan 2006 A1
20060026381 Doi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060190707 McIlvaine et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060236074 Williamson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060277365 Pong Dec 2006 A1
20080077813 Keller et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091880 Vishin Apr 2008 A1
20080126771 Chen et al. May 2008 A1
20080195844 Shen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215865 Hino et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235500 Davis et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080270758 Ozer et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270774 Singh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080282037 Kusachi et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090138659 Lauterbach May 2009 A1
20090157980 Bruce Jun 2009 A1
20090158017 Mutlu et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164733 Kim et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172344 Grochowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090287912 Sendag Nov 2009 A1
20100138607 Hughes et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100169578 Nychka et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100169611 Chou et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100211746 Tsukishiro Aug 2010 A1
20110010521 Wang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110082980 Gschwind et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110082983 Koktan Apr 2011 A1
20110153955 Herrenschmidt Jun 2011 A1
20120005462 Hall et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120042126 Krick et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120239857 Jibbe Sep 2012 A1
20130019047 Podvalny et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130046934 Nychka et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130086417 Sivaramakrishnan et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130097369 Talagala et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130212321 Talagala et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130238874 Avudaiyappan Sep 2013 A1
20130304991 Boettcher et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130311759 Abdallah et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130332660 Talagala Dec 2013 A1
20130346699 Walker Dec 2013 A1
20140032844 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032845 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032856 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140075168 Abdallah Mar 2014 A1
20140108730 Avudaiyappan et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140156947 Avudaiyappan Jun 2014 A1
20140281242 Abdallah et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140365736 Simionescu Dec 2014 A1
20160041908 Avudaiyappan et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160041913 Avudaiyappan et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160041930 Avudaiyappan Feb 2016 A1
20160048469 Waugh Feb 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
1305150 Jul 2001 CN
0596636 May 1994 EP
0706133 Apr 1996 EP
2343270 May 2000 GB
200707284 Mar 1995 TW
539996 Jul 2003 TW
200401187 Jan 2004 TW
591530 Jun 2004 TW
I233545 Jun 2005 TW
I281121 May 2007 TW
0125921 Apr 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (17)
Entry
Barham, et al., “Xen and the Art of Virtualization,” Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, XP002298786, Oct. 2003, pp. 164-177.
Cooperman, “Cache Basics,” Winter 2003, downloaded from http://www.ccs.neu.edu/course/com3200/parent/NOTES/cache-basics.html on Sep. 24, 2015, 3 pages. (no publication month available).
Garmany, J., “The Power of Indexing: Oracle Tips by Burleson Consulting,” Burleson Enterprises, Inc., archived on Mar. 9, 2009, retrieved Sep. 17, 2015 via Internet: web.archive.org/web/20090309201136/http://dba-oracle.com/t_indexing_power.htm, 7 pages.
Jacobson, et al., “Path-based Next Trace Prediction,” MICRO 30—Proceedings of the 30th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, Dec. 1-3, 1997, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 14-23.
Nanda, et al., “The Misprediction Recovery Cache,” International Journal of Parallel Programming—Special issue: MICRO-29, 29th annual IEEE/ACM international symposium on microarchitecture, Plenum Press, New York, NY, Aug. 1998, vol. 26 (4), pp. 383-415.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,532, dated Apr. 7, 2015, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/003,486, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,532, dated Feb. 10, 2017, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,532, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,532, dated May 18, 2016, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,532, dated Oct. 22, 2015, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,532, dated Sep. 21, 2016, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/003,486, dated Aug. 21, 2017, 33 pages.
Rotenberg, et al., “Trace Cache: a Low Latency Approach to High Bandwidth Instruction Fetching,” MICRO 29—Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on Microarchitecture, IEEE Computer Society, Apr. 11, 1996, 48 pages.
Wallace, et al., “Multiple Branch and Block Prediction,” Third International symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, IEEE, Feb. 1997, pp. 94-103.
Ye, et al., “A New Recovery Mechanism in Superscalar Microprocessors by Recovering Critical Misprediction,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Dec. 1, 2011, vol. E94-A (12), pp. 2639-2648.
Yeh, et al., “Increasing the Instruction Fetch Rate via Multiple Branch Prediction and a Branch Address Cache,” ICS 93, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Supercomputing, ACM, New York, NY, Jul. 19-23, 1993, pp. 57-76.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180060243 A1 Mar 2018 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15003486 Jan 2016 US
Child 15806178 US
Parent 13649532 Oct 2012 US
Child 15003486 US