Thin film deposition apparatus and method thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8347813
  • Patent Number
    8,347,813
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 10, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 8, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A thin film deposition apparatus including a substrate mounting error detector, a chamber and a substrate support positioned in the chamber. The substrate support is configured to support a substrate. The substrate mounting error detector includes: a light source configured to provide a light beam to the substrate, such that the substrate reflects the light beam; a collimator configured to selectively pass at least a portion of the light beam reflected by the substrate; and an optical sensor configured to detect the at least a portion of the reflected light beam passed by the collimator. The detector is positioned and oriented to detect substrate position on a lowered support prior to raising the support into contact with an upper cover of a clamshell reactor arrangement. This configuration allows a thin film deposition process only if the substrate is correctly mounted on the substrate support. Thus, abnormal deposition due to a substrate mounting error is prevented in advance.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to and the benefit of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-0130392 filed in the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Dec. 13, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to a deposition apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to a substrate mounting error detector for a deposition apparatus.


2. Description of the Related Art


In manufacturing semiconductor devices, various apparatuses and processes have been developed to provide a high quality thin film on a substrate. Several methods have been used to form a thin film, employing surface reaction of a semiconductor substrate. The methods include vacuum evaporation deposition, Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE), different variants of Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) (including low-pressure and organometallic CVD and plasma-enhanced CVD), and Atomic Layer Epitaxy (ALE). ALE was studied extensively for semiconductor deposition and electroluminescent display applications, and has been more recently referred to as Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) for the deposition of a variety of materials.


Certain deposition apparatuses include one or more reactors housed in a chamber. The reactors may be a chemical vapor deposition reactor or an atomic layer deposition reactor. Each of the reactors can include a substrate support on which a substrate is mounted during a deposition process. If the substrate is not correctly mounted on the substrate support, an abnormal deposition may be made on the substrate, adversely affecting the quality of a deposited film on the substrate. However, because the substrate is inside the chamber, it may be difficult to determine from the outside whether the substrate has been correctly mounted on the substrate support.


The above information disclosed in this Background section is only for enhancement of understanding of the background of the invention and therefore it may contain information that does not form prior art already known in this country to a person of ordinary skill in the art.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a deposition apparatus includes: a chamber and a substrate support positioned in the chamber. The substrate support is configured to support a substrate. The apparatus also includes a substrate mounting error detector including: a light source configured to provide a light beam to the substrate, such that the substrate reflects the light beam; a collimator configured to selectively pass at least a portion of the light beam reflected by the substrate when the substrate is property mounted; and an optical sensor configured to detect the at least a portion of the reflected light beam passed by the collimator.


In another embodiment, a deposition apparatus includes: a substrate support configured to support a substrate; and a substrate mounting error detector. The substrate mounting error detector includes: a light source configured to generate a light beam directed to the substrate support; a collimator including one or more openings that are configured to selectively pass particularly oriented and directed portions of the light beam as reflected from the substrate or the substrate support; and an optical sensor configured to detect the portions of the light beam passed by the collimator.


In yet another embodiment, a method of depositing a thin film includes: loading a substrate onto a substrate support within a chamber; providing a light beam onto the substrate such that the light beam is reflected by the substrate; passing at least a portion of the reflected light beam when the substrate is positioned at a correct location of the substrate support while blocking the entire portion of the light beam when the substrate is positioned at an incorrect location of the substrate support; and detecting the at least a portion of the light beam.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a deposition apparatus including a substrate mounting error detector according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a side view of a collimator of a substrate mounting error detector in a deposition apparatus according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 illustrates paths of a light beam during the operation of the substrate mounting error detector of FIG. 1(A) when no substrate is mounted on a substrate support and (B) when a substrate is correctly mounted on the substrate support, respectively.



FIG. 4 illustrates paths of a light beam during the operation of the substrate mounting error detector of FIG. 1(C) when a substrate is incorrectly mounted on a substrate support and (B) when a substrate is correctly mounted on the substrate support, respectively.



FIG. 5 to FIG. 9 are cross-sectional views of the apparatus of FIG. 1 illustrating a method of loading a substrate into a deposition apparatus according to one embodiment.












<Description of Reference Numerals For Components in the Drawings>


















 10: chamber
 20: substrate support



 30: upper cover
 40: substrate transfer device



110: light source
120: reflecting mirror



130: collimator
140: optical sensor













DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments are shown. As those skilled in the art would realize, the described embodiments may be modified in various different ways, all without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.


The drawings are not to scale, but rather have dimensions exaggerated for clarity. Like reference numerals designate like elements throughout the specification. It will be understood that when an element, such as a device or part, is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” another element, there are no intervening elements present.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a deposition apparatus having a substrate mounting error detector according to one embodiment. The illustrated deposition apparatus includes a chamber 10 housing a plurality of reactors, a substrate transfer device 40, a substrate loader 50 for each reactor, a substrate support driver 60 for each reactor, a plurality of substrate mounting error detectors, first light transmission windows 150, and second light transmission windows 160.


The chamber 10 serves to house the plurality of reactors. The chamber 10 may include a top plate 10a, sidewalls 10b, and a bottom plate 10c, which together define an isolated space therein. While the chamber 10 is shown in cross-section to house two reactors in the illustrated embodiment, a skilled artisan will appreciate that the number of reactors in the chamber 10 can vary widely, depending on the design of the deposition apparatus.


The reactors may be used for atomic layer deposition (ALD) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Each of the reactors may include a substrate support 20 and an upper cover 30 that together define a reaction space for a deposition process.


The substrate support 20 serves to support a substrate 1 thereon during a deposition process. In the illustrated embodiment, the substrate support 20 is vertically movable between a lower position and an upper position. The upper cover 30 is positioned over the substrate support 20 while being spaced apart therefrom by a gap during loading or unloading a substrate. After a substrate is loaded on the substrate support 30 for deposition, the substrate support 20 is moved upward toward the upper cover 30. During a deposition process, the substrate support 20 may be in contact with peripheral portions of the upper cover 30 to form the reaction space. The upper cover 30 and the substrate support 20 together form a so-called clamshell reactor.


The substrate transfer device 40 serves to transfer a substrate 1 into and out of the chamber 10. The substrate transfer device 40 may include a robot arm and an end effector. In the illustrated embodiment, there is only one door for the robot arm, and the positions of the reactors may change such that one of the reactors is positioned close to the robot arm when loading a substrate onto the reactor or unloading the substrate from the reactor. In some embodiments, the substrate supports 20 of the reactors may be mounted on a rotating platform. In other embodiments, the substrate supports 20 may be configured to rotate around the center of the chamber 10, using any suitable mechanism. A skilled artisan will appreciate that various configurations of transfer devices can be adapted for use in the apparatus.


The substrate loader 50 serves to place the substrate 1 onto the substrate support 20 or lift it from the substrate support 20. When the substrate 1 is loaded into the reactor, it is transferred into the chamber 10 by the substrate transfer device 40. Then, the substrate loader 50 loads the substrate 1 onto the substrate support 20. The substrate loader 50 is installed at the substrate support 20. The substrate loader 50 may include a plurality of substrate supporting pins 51 for holding the substrate 1, and a substrate supporting pin elevating member 52 connected to the substrate supporting pins 51 to elevate them. The substrate supporting pin elevating member 52 may include an electrical motor or an air cylinder. In the illustrated embodiment, the substrate supporting pin driver 52 includes an air cylinder. In other arrangements, the pins could be stationary while movement of the support relative to the stationary pins accomplishes the loading and unloading.


The substrate support driver 60 is connected to the bottom of the substrate support 20 to vertically drive it. The substrate support driver 60 may include a shaft 61 connected to the substrate support 20, and a shaft elevating member 62 for elevating the shaft 61. The shaft elevating member 62 may include an electrical motor or an air cylinder. In the illustrated embodiment, the shaft elevating member 62 includes an air cylinder.


Each of the substrate mounting error detectors may include a light source 110, a reflecting mirror 120, a collimator 130, and an optical sensor 140. In one embodiment, each of the reactors may be provided with a substrate mounting error detector. In other embodiments, two or more of the reactors may share the same substrate mounting error detector.


The light source 110 may be positioned over the top plate 10a of the chamber 10 outside the chamber 10. The light source 110 serves to provide a light beam for detection of a substrate mounting error. The light beam may be a visible light beam or laser, The light source 110 may include a head that includes a lens. The lens serves to provide a focused light beam. The light beam travels into the chamber 10 through the first light transmission window 150 in the top plate 10a of the chamber 10. A skilled artisan will appreciate that the position of the light source can vary widely, depending on the design of the deposition apparatus.


In the illustrated embodiment, the light source 110 is oriented to provide a light beam such that the light beam travels substantially perpendicular to the first light transmission window 150. This configuration allows the light beam to pass through the first light transmission window 150 with minimal or no loss. Therefore, the light beam from the light source 110 placed outside the chamber 10 can pass through the chamber 10 with minimal or no loss, and reach the reflecting mirror 120.


The reflecting mirror 120 is positioned within the chamber 10. The reflecting mirror 120 is oriented such that it can reflect the light beam from the light source 110 toward the substrate support 20. If the mirror is partially transparent, preferably the angle of incidence is such that the reflecting mirror 120 may substantially totally reflect the light beam from the light source 110 toward the substrate 1. The reflecting mirror 120 may be installed such that it does not interfere with vertical movements of either or both of the substrate support 20 and the upper cover 30. In the illustrated embodiment, the reflecting mirror 120 is fixed to a lower surface of the top plate 10a of the chamber 10. The reflecting mirror 120 may include a plate coated with a specular material. In other embodiments, the reflecting mirror 120 can include a conventional mirror.


The collimator 130 is positioned at or outside the sidewall 10b of the chamber 10 such that it is interposed between the optical sensor 140 and the second light transmission window 160. The collimator 130 is positioned at a point on a path of the light beam that originates from the light source 110 and is reflected by the substrate 1 in the reactor. The collimator 130 blocks at least a portion of the light beam reflected by the substrate 1 such that it passes the light beam to the optical sensor 140 only when the substrate 1 is correctly or properly mounted on the substrate support 20. In the illustrated embodiment, a substrate is “correctly” or “properly” mounted if it sits in a pocket of the substrate support 20, and is flush with the support surface of the substrate support 20. In other embodiments, a substrate is “correctly” or “properly” mounted if it is flush with the support surface of a substrate support at a selected location of the substrate support. The details of the collimator 130 will be described later in detail.


The optical sensor 140 serves to sense the light beam that has passed the collimator 130. The optical sensor 140 may include any suitable light sensor for detecting a light beam reflected by the substrate 1. A sensor amplifier (not shown) may be connected to the optical sensor 140 to amplify an output signal from the optical sensor 140 to enhance the accuracy of detecting a substrate mounting error. The optical sensor 140 may include a light-receiving head that receives a light beam. In the illustrated embodiment, the term “light-receiving head” refers to an area that forms a light-sensitive surface. In one embodiment, the head may have a selected diameter of about 2 mm to about 3 mm. When the optical sensor 140 receives no light beam at the light-receiving head, it outputs no signal, indicating that a substrate mounting error has occurred.


Each of the first light transmission windows 150 may be installed at the top plate 10a of the chamber 10. The first light transmission window 150 is positioned to provide a passage through the top plate 10a such that the light beam from the light source 110 can reach the mirror 120 in the inner space of the chamber 10. The first light transmission window 150 may be formed of a substantially transparent material, such as quartz.


Each of the second light transmission windows 160 may be installed at the sidewall 10b of the chamber 10 on a path of the light beam from the substrate 1 to the optical sensor 140. The second light transmission window 160 may be formed of a transparent material, such as quartz. The light beam reflected from the substrate 1 may be refracted before reaching the optical sensor 140, depending upon the refractive index of the second light transmission window 160. Thus, the position of the optical sensor 140 may be selected to account for any refraction.


Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, the configuration of the collimator 130 according to one embodiment will be described below in detail. As shown in FIG. 3, the light-receiving head of the optical sensor 140 may have a relatively large diameter D of, for example, about 2 mm to about 3 mm. Absent the collimator 130, even when the substrate 1 is not correctly mounted on the substrate support 20, the light-receiving head of the optical sensor 140 may receive the light beam reflected by the substrate 1. Thus, the optical sensor 140 may erroneously indicate that the substrate is mounted without an error.


The collimator 130 serves to prevent such an error by narrowing the light beam. The collimator 130 passes at least a portion of the reflected light beam only when the substrate is correctly mounted on the substrate support 20.



FIG. 2 is an enlarged side view of the collimator 130 installed at the sidewall 10b of the chamber 10. The illustrated collimator 130 includes a vertically moving member 131, and a horizontally moving member 132. The vertically moving member 131 includes a horizontal slit 131a for light passage. The vertically moving member 131 is vertically movable. The horizontally moving member 132 includes a vertical slit 132a for light passage. The horizontally moving member 132 is horizontally movable. In one embodiment, the horizontal slit 131 a may have a length of about 10 mm to about 20 mm, and a width of about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm. The vertical slit 132a have a length of about 10 mm to about 20 mm, and a width of about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm.


The vertically moving member 131 and the horizontally moving member 132 partially overlap with each other such that the vertical slit 131a and the horizontal slit 132a cross each other. The vertical slit 131a and the horizontal slit 132a together form a square-shaped opening 135 where they overlap with each other. In one embodiment, the opening 135 may have horizontal and vertical widths, each of which may be about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm. The opening 135 of the collimator 130 has a dimension that is smaller than the diameter D of the light-receiving head of the optical sensor 140 and accordingly covers a smaller area than the head of the optical sensor 140. In addition, the opening 135 of the collimator 130 may allow the reflected light beam to pass therethrough only when the light beam is oriented to have a selected angle relative to the collimator 130 such that it travels in a specific direction defined by the opening of the collimator 130. In the illustrated embodiment, the position of the opening 135 may be calibrated by moving the vertically and horizontally moving members 131, 132.


When no substrate is mounted on the substrate support 20 or a substrate 1 is incorrectly mounted on the substrate support 20, the light beam reflected by the substrate support 20 or the incorrectly mounted substrate may not reach the opening 135 of the collimator. In such instances, even if the light beam reaches the opening 135, it may not be oriented to have the selected angle that would allow the light beam through the collimator 130. Thus, in such instances, the collimator 130 does not allow the light beam to reach the optical sensor 140. The light-receiving head of the optical sensor 140 does not receive the light beam, and the optical sensor 140 indicates that the substrate is not correctly mounted on the substrate support 20.


Referring to FIG. 3, the operation of the substrate mounting error detector will now be described below in detail. FIG. 3 illustrates possible paths A, B of a light beam provided by the light source 110. As shown in FIG. 3, the light path A when the substrate 1 is not mounted on the substrate support 20 is different from the light path B when the substrate 1 is correctly mounted on the substrate support 20. In the illustrated embodiment, a distance between the light paths A, B may be about 1.6 mm.


When no substrate is mounted on the substrate support 20, a light beam reflected from the substrate support 20 may not reach the optical sensor 140 because it is blocked by the collimator 130. Because the optical sensor 140 has a relatively big light-receiving head, absent the collimator 130 the reflected light beam may reach the head of the optical sensor 140, resulting in an erroneous reading of a present substrate. However, the collimator 130 blocks the entire portion of the light beam from reaching the optical sensor 140 when the substrate is absent, and the optical sensor 140 does not detect a light. Thus, the substrate mounting error detector can provide a correct result.



FIG. 4 illustrates other possible paths of a light beam provided by the light source 110. As shown in FIG. 4, a light path B is formed when the substrate 1 is mounted at the correct position on the substrate support 20. A light path C is formed when the substrate 1 is incorrectly mounted on the substrate support 20. In the illustrated example, the incorrectly mounted substrate 1 is tilted at an angle of, for example, 0.15 degrees. For that example, a distance between the light paths B, C may be about 2.8 mm.


When a substrate is incorrectly mounted on the substrate support 20, a light beam reflected from the substrate 20 may not reach the optical sensor 140 because it is blocked by the collimator 130. However, because the optical sensor 140 has a relatively big light-receiving head, absent the collimator 130 the reflected light beam may reach the head of the optical sensor 140, resulting in an erroneous reading of proper substrate mounting. However, the collimator 130 blocks the entire portion of the light beam from reaching the optical sensor 140 when the substrate is so tilted, and the optical sensor 140 does not detect a light. Thus, the substrate mounting error detector can provide a correct result.


Referring to FIGS. 5 to 9, a method of loading a substrate into the deposition apparatus of FIG. 1 according to one embodiment will be described below. First, as shown in FIG. 5, a substrate 1 is transferred into the chamber 10 using the substrate transfer device 40. The substrate 1 is positioned at a first vertical level above the substrate support 20.


Next, as shown in FIG. 6, the substrate supporting pins 51 are moved up to hold the substrate 1 at a second vertical level above the first vertical level. The transfer device 40 is moved outside of the chamber 10 after unloading the substrate 1 from its end effector. As shown in FIG. 7, the substrate supporting pins 51 are moved down to load the substrate 1 onto the substrate support 20.


Subsequently, as shown in FIG. 8, a substrate mounting error detector (110, 120, 130, and 140) detects whether or not the substrate 1 has been correctly mounted on the support 20. The light source 110 provides a light beam to the mirror 120. The light beam is reflected by the mirror 120 and reaches the top surface of the substrate 1. The light beam is reflected by the top surface of the substrate 1, and travels toward the collimator 130. A portion of the light beam may pass the collimator 130 and reach the optical sensor 140 if the substrate is present and has been correctly mounted on the substrate support 20. In contrast, if the substrate is absent or has not been correctly mounted on the substrate support 20, the collimator 130 blocks the entire portion of the light beam, and thus the light beam does not reach the optical sensor 140. In this manner, depending on whether the optical sensor 140 detects light, the substrate mounting error detector can determine whether the substrate 1 has been correctly mounted on the substrate support 20.


Next, as shown in FIG. 9, when it is found that the substrate 1 has been correctly mounted on the substrate support 20, the substrate support 20 is elevated such that it tightly contacts the upper cover 30 to form a reaction space for deposition. Then, a deposition process is conducted in the reaction space. If the substrate 1 has been incorrectly mounted on the substrate support 20, the substrate 1 may be returned to the outside by the substrate transfer device 40. A new substrate 1 may be transferred into the chamber 10. Alternatively, the returned substrate may be reloaded onto the substrate support 1 after adjustment of the position of the substrate 1.


In the illustrated embodiment, because the substrate support 20 and the upper cover 30 are formed of an opaque material, such as a metal, a light beam cannot pass therethrough. The detection of a substrate mounting error is performed only when the substrate support 20 is at a lower position at which the substrate support 20 is spaced apart from the upper cover 30. The substrate mounting error detector provides a light beam through a space between the substrate support 20 and the upper cover while the substrate support 20 is at the lower position, but not when the substrate support 20 is in contact with the upper cover 30.


In the embodiments described above, a deposition process is performed after it is determined whether a substrate has been correctly mounted on the support. Thus, abnormal film deposition due to a substrate mounting error can be prevented. Moreover, the proper detection of mounting errors can prevent wasted time and gases (if there was no substrate), and prevent wafer breakage (if the substrate was improperly mounted during reactor closure). Thus, it is possible to prevent the substrate and the film from being damaged due to the substrate mounting error, thereby enhancing the device reliability.


While this invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be practical exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A deposition apparatus comprising: a chamber;a substrate support positioned in the chamber, the substrate support being configured to support a substrate; anda substrate mounting error detector comprising: a light source configured to provide a light beam to the substrate, such that the substrate reflects the light beam;a collimator configured to selectively pass at least a portion of the light beam reflected by the substrate when the substrate is properly mounted; andan optical sensor configured to detect the at least a portion of the reflected light beam passed by the collimator, wherein the collimator comprises a vertically moving member including a horizontal slit, and a horizontally moving member including a vertical slit partially overlapping with the horizontal slit, and wherein the horizontal slit and the vertical slit cross each other to together define an opening that selectively pass the at least a portion of the reflected light beam when the substrate is properly mounted.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the optical sensor includes a light-receiving head including a light-sensitive area, and wherein the opening covers a smaller area than the light-sensitive area of the light-receiving head.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the opening is aligned with the light-receiving head such that the at least a portion of the reflected light beam reaches the light-receiving head through the opening.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the opening has an area having a horizontal width and a vertical width, at least one of the horizontal and vertical widths being from about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the optical sensor comprises a light-receiving head having a diameter of about 2 mm to about 3 mm.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the optical sensor is positioned outside the chamber, and wherein the apparatus further comprises a light transmission window in one of the sidewalls between the substrate support and the optical sensor.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the optical sensor is positioned at or adjacent to one of the sidewalls, and wherein the collimator is interposed between the optical sensor and the substrate support.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising an upper cover configured to define a reaction space together with the substrate support, wherein the substrate support is vertically movable between a lower position and an upper position, and wherein the light source is configured to provide the light beam through a space between the upper cover and the substrate support, when the substrate support is at the lower position.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a mirror in the chamber, wherein the mirror is oriented to reflect the light beam from the light source toward the substrate.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the optical sensor includes a light-receiving head including a light-sensitive area, and wherein the opening covers a smaller area than the light-sensitive area of the light-receiving head.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the opening is aligned with the light-receiving head such that the at least a portion of the reflected light beam reaches the light-receiving head through the opening.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the opening has an area having a horizontal width and a vertical width, at least one of the horizontal and vertical widths being from about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the optical sensor comprises a light-receiving head having a diameter of about 2 mm to about 3 mm.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the optical sensor is positioned outside the chamber, and wherein the apparatus further comprises a light transmission window in one of the sidewalls between the substrate support and the optical sensor.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the optical sensor is positioned at or adjacent to one of the sidewalls, and wherein the collimator is interposed between the optical sensor and the substrate support.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising an upper cover configured to define a reaction space together with the substrate support, wherein the substrate support is vertically movable between a lower position and an upper position, and wherein the light source is configured to provide the light beam through a space between the upper cover and the substrate support when the substrate support is at the lower position.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2007-0130392 Dec 2007 KR national
US Referenced Citations (120)
Number Name Date Kind
3308709 Harrick Mar 1967 A
3822946 Rynkowski Jul 1974 A
3907439 Zanoni Sep 1975 A
3945505 Frisbie et al. Mar 1976 A
4024944 Adams et al. May 1977 A
4107539 Kirsch Aug 1978 A
4148344 Critchell et al. Apr 1979 A
4201378 Hams May 1980 A
4228886 Moran Oct 1980 A
4449885 Hertel et al. May 1984 A
4457664 Judell et al. Jul 1984 A
4466073 Boyan et al. Aug 1984 A
4507078 Tam et al. Mar 1985 A
4523985 Dimock Jun 1985 A
4545106 Juengel Oct 1985 A
4559451 Curl Dec 1985 A
4618292 Judge et al. Oct 1986 A
4635373 Miyazaki et al. Jan 1987 A
4647268 Scholl Mar 1987 A
4697089 Drage Sep 1987 A
4698511 Sueda et al. Oct 1987 A
4698775 Koch et al. Oct 1987 A
4705951 Layman et al. Nov 1987 A
4720635 Uga Jan 1988 A
4730882 Messerschmidt Mar 1988 A
4743769 Schwaiger May 1988 A
4744713 Hrovath May 1988 A
4765793 Goddeau Aug 1988 A
4770590 Hugues et al. Sep 1988 A
4789294 Sato et al. Dec 1988 A
4818169 Schram et al. Apr 1989 A
4819167 Cheng et al. Apr 1989 A
4833790 Spencer et al. May 1989 A
4836733 Hertel et al. Jun 1989 A
4838733 Katz Jun 1989 A
4880348 Baker et al. Nov 1989 A
4907035 Galburt et al. Mar 1990 A
4951601 Maydan et al. Aug 1990 A
5044752 Thurfjell et al. Sep 1991 A
5162642 Akamatsu et al. Nov 1992 A
5194743 Aoyama et al. Mar 1993 A
5239182 Tateyama et al. Aug 1993 A
5264918 Kagami Nov 1993 A
5483138 Shmookler et al. Jan 1996 A
5555051 Maruyama et al. Sep 1996 A
5563798 Berken et al. Oct 1996 A
5631171 Sandstrom et al. May 1997 A
5651086 Russell et al. Jul 1997 A
5706201 Andrews Jan 1998 A
5706930 Sahoda et al. Jan 1998 A
5710069 Farkas et al. Jan 1998 A
5721607 Ota Feb 1998 A
5729337 Tanaka Mar 1998 A
5740062 Berken et al. Apr 1998 A
5768125 Zinger et al. Jun 1998 A
5783834 Shatas Jul 1998 A
5812714 Hulse Sep 1998 A
5822213 Huynh Oct 1998 A
5841540 Mondie Nov 1998 A
5844683 Pavloski et al. Dec 1998 A
5870488 Rush et al. Feb 1999 A
5870498 Mayer Feb 1999 A
5885353 Strodtbeck et al. Mar 1999 A
5900737 Graham et al. May 1999 A
5905850 Kaveh May 1999 A
5906860 Motoda et al. May 1999 A
5917601 Shimazaki et al. Jun 1999 A
5923694 Culver Jul 1999 A
5961169 Kalenian et al. Oct 1999 A
5969639 Lauf et al. Oct 1999 A
5980194 Freerks et al. Nov 1999 A
5995234 Nishi Nov 1999 A
6026561 Lafond Feb 2000 A
6051074 Strodtbeck et al. Apr 2000 A
6075606 Doan Jun 2000 A
6082950 Altwood et al. Jul 2000 A
6086064 Biegelsen et al. Jul 2000 A
6090209 Strodtbeck et al. Jul 2000 A
6099596 Li et al. Aug 2000 A
6108092 Sandhu Aug 2000 A
6113165 Wen et al. Sep 2000 A
6131589 Vogtmann et al. Oct 2000 A
6162008 Perkins et al. Dec 2000 A
6167322 Holbrooks Dec 2000 A
6172756 Chalmers et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197117 Li et al. Mar 2001 B1
6198976 Sundar et al. Mar 2001 B1
6220945 Hirokawa et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242718 Ferro et al. Jun 2001 B1
6267642 Vogtmann et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280291 Gromko et al. Aug 2001 B1
6293749 Raaijmakers et al. Sep 2001 B1
6305898 Yamagishi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6322116 Stevens Nov 2001 B1
6327517 Sundar Dec 2001 B1
6331023 Goodwin et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332116 Qian et al. Dec 2001 B1
6438449 Kawamatsu et al. Aug 2002 B2
6502054 Mooring et al. Dec 2002 B1
6615113 Kretz et al. Sep 2003 B2
6624898 Chen Sep 2003 B1
6665583 Kretz et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683654 Haijima Jan 2004 B1
6690986 Mitchell et al. Feb 2004 B1
6728596 Lindseth Apr 2004 B1
6771374 Rangarajan et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788891 Mitsugi Sep 2004 B1
6823753 Beginski Nov 2004 B1
6849151 Barnes et al. Feb 2005 B2
6900877 Raaijmakers May 2005 B2
6950774 Donald Sep 2005 B2
6961639 Gaudon et al. Nov 2005 B2
7008802 Lu Mar 2006 B2
20020052052 Robinson et al. May 2002 A1
20040255853 Ma et al. Dec 2004 A1
20060130750 Ishikawa et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070037300 Qin et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070242281 Beginski et al. Oct 2007 A1
20090093906 Takizawa et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090252580 Takizawa et al. Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
0 282 233 Sep 1988 EP
0 313 466 Apr 1989 EP
0 597 637 May 1994 EP
58-055270 Apr 1983 JP
60-024518 Feb 1985 JP
61-087352 May 1986 JP
361125038 Jun 1986 JP
61-184842 Aug 1986 JP
61-228639 Oct 1986 JP
62-073643 Apr 1987 JP
403012946 Jan 1991 JP
11-347975 Dec 1999 JP
2005-093807 Apr 2005 JP
WO 9952686 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0042638 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0068977 Nov 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090155452 A1 Jun 2009 US