This application claims priority to and the benefit of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-0130392 filed in the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Dec. 13, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a deposition apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to a substrate mounting error detector for a deposition apparatus.
2. Description of the Related Art
In manufacturing semiconductor devices, various apparatuses and processes have been developed to provide a high quality thin film on a substrate. Several methods have been used to form a thin film, employing surface reaction of a semiconductor substrate. The methods include vacuum evaporation deposition, Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE), different variants of Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) (including low-pressure and organometallic CVD and plasma-enhanced CVD), and Atomic Layer Epitaxy (ALE). ALE was studied extensively for semiconductor deposition and electroluminescent display applications, and has been more recently referred to as Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) for the deposition of a variety of materials.
Certain deposition apparatuses include one or more reactors housed in a chamber. The reactors may be a chemical vapor deposition reactor or an atomic layer deposition reactor. Each of the reactors can include a substrate support on which a substrate is mounted during a deposition process. If the substrate is not correctly mounted on the substrate support, an abnormal deposition may be made on the substrate, adversely affecting the quality of a deposited film on the substrate. However, because the substrate is inside the chamber, it may be difficult to determine from the outside whether the substrate has been correctly mounted on the substrate support.
The above information disclosed in this Background section is only for enhancement of understanding of the background of the invention and therefore it may contain information that does not form prior art already known in this country to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
In one embodiment, a deposition apparatus includes: a chamber and a substrate support positioned in the chamber. The substrate support is configured to support a substrate. The apparatus also includes a substrate mounting error detector including: a light source configured to provide a light beam to the substrate, such that the substrate reflects the light beam; a collimator configured to selectively pass at least a portion of the light beam reflected by the substrate when the substrate is property mounted; and an optical sensor configured to detect the at least a portion of the reflected light beam passed by the collimator.
In another embodiment, a deposition apparatus includes: a substrate support configured to support a substrate; and a substrate mounting error detector. The substrate mounting error detector includes: a light source configured to generate a light beam directed to the substrate support; a collimator including one or more openings that are configured to selectively pass particularly oriented and directed portions of the light beam as reflected from the substrate or the substrate support; and an optical sensor configured to detect the portions of the light beam passed by the collimator.
In yet another embodiment, a method of depositing a thin film includes: loading a substrate onto a substrate support within a chamber; providing a light beam onto the substrate such that the light beam is reflected by the substrate; passing at least a portion of the reflected light beam when the substrate is positioned at a correct location of the substrate support while blocking the entire portion of the light beam when the substrate is positioned at an incorrect location of the substrate support; and detecting the at least a portion of the light beam.
The invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments are shown. As those skilled in the art would realize, the described embodiments may be modified in various different ways, all without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
The drawings are not to scale, but rather have dimensions exaggerated for clarity. Like reference numerals designate like elements throughout the specification. It will be understood that when an element, such as a device or part, is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” another element, there are no intervening elements present.
The chamber 10 serves to house the plurality of reactors. The chamber 10 may include a top plate 10a, sidewalls 10b, and a bottom plate 10c, which together define an isolated space therein. While the chamber 10 is shown in cross-section to house two reactors in the illustrated embodiment, a skilled artisan will appreciate that the number of reactors in the chamber 10 can vary widely, depending on the design of the deposition apparatus.
The reactors may be used for atomic layer deposition (ALD) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Each of the reactors may include a substrate support 20 and an upper cover 30 that together define a reaction space for a deposition process.
The substrate support 20 serves to support a substrate 1 thereon during a deposition process. In the illustrated embodiment, the substrate support 20 is vertically movable between a lower position and an upper position. The upper cover 30 is positioned over the substrate support 20 while being spaced apart therefrom by a gap during loading or unloading a substrate. After a substrate is loaded on the substrate support 30 for deposition, the substrate support 20 is moved upward toward the upper cover 30. During a deposition process, the substrate support 20 may be in contact with peripheral portions of the upper cover 30 to form the reaction space. The upper cover 30 and the substrate support 20 together form a so-called clamshell reactor.
The substrate transfer device 40 serves to transfer a substrate 1 into and out of the chamber 10. The substrate transfer device 40 may include a robot arm and an end effector. In the illustrated embodiment, there is only one door for the robot arm, and the positions of the reactors may change such that one of the reactors is positioned close to the robot arm when loading a substrate onto the reactor or unloading the substrate from the reactor. In some embodiments, the substrate supports 20 of the reactors may be mounted on a rotating platform. In other embodiments, the substrate supports 20 may be configured to rotate around the center of the chamber 10, using any suitable mechanism. A skilled artisan will appreciate that various configurations of transfer devices can be adapted for use in the apparatus.
The substrate loader 50 serves to place the substrate 1 onto the substrate support 20 or lift it from the substrate support 20. When the substrate 1 is loaded into the reactor, it is transferred into the chamber 10 by the substrate transfer device 40. Then, the substrate loader 50 loads the substrate 1 onto the substrate support 20. The substrate loader 50 is installed at the substrate support 20. The substrate loader 50 may include a plurality of substrate supporting pins 51 for holding the substrate 1, and a substrate supporting pin elevating member 52 connected to the substrate supporting pins 51 to elevate them. The substrate supporting pin elevating member 52 may include an electrical motor or an air cylinder. In the illustrated embodiment, the substrate supporting pin driver 52 includes an air cylinder. In other arrangements, the pins could be stationary while movement of the support relative to the stationary pins accomplishes the loading and unloading.
The substrate support driver 60 is connected to the bottom of the substrate support 20 to vertically drive it. The substrate support driver 60 may include a shaft 61 connected to the substrate support 20, and a shaft elevating member 62 for elevating the shaft 61. The shaft elevating member 62 may include an electrical motor or an air cylinder. In the illustrated embodiment, the shaft elevating member 62 includes an air cylinder.
Each of the substrate mounting error detectors may include a light source 110, a reflecting mirror 120, a collimator 130, and an optical sensor 140. In one embodiment, each of the reactors may be provided with a substrate mounting error detector. In other embodiments, two or more of the reactors may share the same substrate mounting error detector.
The light source 110 may be positioned over the top plate 10a of the chamber 10 outside the chamber 10. The light source 110 serves to provide a light beam for detection of a substrate mounting error. The light beam may be a visible light beam or laser, The light source 110 may include a head that includes a lens. The lens serves to provide a focused light beam. The light beam travels into the chamber 10 through the first light transmission window 150 in the top plate 10a of the chamber 10. A skilled artisan will appreciate that the position of the light source can vary widely, depending on the design of the deposition apparatus.
In the illustrated embodiment, the light source 110 is oriented to provide a light beam such that the light beam travels substantially perpendicular to the first light transmission window 150. This configuration allows the light beam to pass through the first light transmission window 150 with minimal or no loss. Therefore, the light beam from the light source 110 placed outside the chamber 10 can pass through the chamber 10 with minimal or no loss, and reach the reflecting mirror 120.
The reflecting mirror 120 is positioned within the chamber 10. The reflecting mirror 120 is oriented such that it can reflect the light beam from the light source 110 toward the substrate support 20. If the mirror is partially transparent, preferably the angle of incidence is such that the reflecting mirror 120 may substantially totally reflect the light beam from the light source 110 toward the substrate 1. The reflecting mirror 120 may be installed such that it does not interfere with vertical movements of either or both of the substrate support 20 and the upper cover 30. In the illustrated embodiment, the reflecting mirror 120 is fixed to a lower surface of the top plate 10a of the chamber 10. The reflecting mirror 120 may include a plate coated with a specular material. In other embodiments, the reflecting mirror 120 can include a conventional mirror.
The collimator 130 is positioned at or outside the sidewall 10b of the chamber 10 such that it is interposed between the optical sensor 140 and the second light transmission window 160. The collimator 130 is positioned at a point on a path of the light beam that originates from the light source 110 and is reflected by the substrate 1 in the reactor. The collimator 130 blocks at least a portion of the light beam reflected by the substrate 1 such that it passes the light beam to the optical sensor 140 only when the substrate 1 is correctly or properly mounted on the substrate support 20. In the illustrated embodiment, a substrate is “correctly” or “properly” mounted if it sits in a pocket of the substrate support 20, and is flush with the support surface of the substrate support 20. In other embodiments, a substrate is “correctly” or “properly” mounted if it is flush with the support surface of a substrate support at a selected location of the substrate support. The details of the collimator 130 will be described later in detail.
The optical sensor 140 serves to sense the light beam that has passed the collimator 130. The optical sensor 140 may include any suitable light sensor for detecting a light beam reflected by the substrate 1. A sensor amplifier (not shown) may be connected to the optical sensor 140 to amplify an output signal from the optical sensor 140 to enhance the accuracy of detecting a substrate mounting error. The optical sensor 140 may include a light-receiving head that receives a light beam. In the illustrated embodiment, the term “light-receiving head” refers to an area that forms a light-sensitive surface. In one embodiment, the head may have a selected diameter of about 2 mm to about 3 mm. When the optical sensor 140 receives no light beam at the light-receiving head, it outputs no signal, indicating that a substrate mounting error has occurred.
Each of the first light transmission windows 150 may be installed at the top plate 10a of the chamber 10. The first light transmission window 150 is positioned to provide a passage through the top plate 10a such that the light beam from the light source 110 can reach the mirror 120 in the inner space of the chamber 10. The first light transmission window 150 may be formed of a substantially transparent material, such as quartz.
Each of the second light transmission windows 160 may be installed at the sidewall 10b of the chamber 10 on a path of the light beam from the substrate 1 to the optical sensor 140. The second light transmission window 160 may be formed of a transparent material, such as quartz. The light beam reflected from the substrate 1 may be refracted before reaching the optical sensor 140, depending upon the refractive index of the second light transmission window 160. Thus, the position of the optical sensor 140 may be selected to account for any refraction.
Referring to
The collimator 130 serves to prevent such an error by narrowing the light beam. The collimator 130 passes at least a portion of the reflected light beam only when the substrate is correctly mounted on the substrate support 20.
The vertically moving member 131 and the horizontally moving member 132 partially overlap with each other such that the vertical slit 131a and the horizontal slit 132a cross each other. The vertical slit 131a and the horizontal slit 132a together form a square-shaped opening 135 where they overlap with each other. In one embodiment, the opening 135 may have horizontal and vertical widths, each of which may be about 0.9 mm to about 1.1 mm. The opening 135 of the collimator 130 has a dimension that is smaller than the diameter D of the light-receiving head of the optical sensor 140 and accordingly covers a smaller area than the head of the optical sensor 140. In addition, the opening 135 of the collimator 130 may allow the reflected light beam to pass therethrough only when the light beam is oriented to have a selected angle relative to the collimator 130 such that it travels in a specific direction defined by the opening of the collimator 130. In the illustrated embodiment, the position of the opening 135 may be calibrated by moving the vertically and horizontally moving members 131, 132.
When no substrate is mounted on the substrate support 20 or a substrate 1 is incorrectly mounted on the substrate support 20, the light beam reflected by the substrate support 20 or the incorrectly mounted substrate may not reach the opening 135 of the collimator. In such instances, even if the light beam reaches the opening 135, it may not be oriented to have the selected angle that would allow the light beam through the collimator 130. Thus, in such instances, the collimator 130 does not allow the light beam to reach the optical sensor 140. The light-receiving head of the optical sensor 140 does not receive the light beam, and the optical sensor 140 indicates that the substrate is not correctly mounted on the substrate support 20.
Referring to
When no substrate is mounted on the substrate support 20, a light beam reflected from the substrate support 20 may not reach the optical sensor 140 because it is blocked by the collimator 130. Because the optical sensor 140 has a relatively big light-receiving head, absent the collimator 130 the reflected light beam may reach the head of the optical sensor 140, resulting in an erroneous reading of a present substrate. However, the collimator 130 blocks the entire portion of the light beam from reaching the optical sensor 140 when the substrate is absent, and the optical sensor 140 does not detect a light. Thus, the substrate mounting error detector can provide a correct result.
When a substrate is incorrectly mounted on the substrate support 20, a light beam reflected from the substrate 20 may not reach the optical sensor 140 because it is blocked by the collimator 130. However, because the optical sensor 140 has a relatively big light-receiving head, absent the collimator 130 the reflected light beam may reach the head of the optical sensor 140, resulting in an erroneous reading of proper substrate mounting. However, the collimator 130 blocks the entire portion of the light beam from reaching the optical sensor 140 when the substrate is so tilted, and the optical sensor 140 does not detect a light. Thus, the substrate mounting error detector can provide a correct result.
Referring to
Next, as shown in
Subsequently, as shown in
Next, as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, because the substrate support 20 and the upper cover 30 are formed of an opaque material, such as a metal, a light beam cannot pass therethrough. The detection of a substrate mounting error is performed only when the substrate support 20 is at a lower position at which the substrate support 20 is spaced apart from the upper cover 30. The substrate mounting error detector provides a light beam through a space between the substrate support 20 and the upper cover while the substrate support 20 is at the lower position, but not when the substrate support 20 is in contact with the upper cover 30.
In the embodiments described above, a deposition process is performed after it is determined whether a substrate has been correctly mounted on the support. Thus, abnormal film deposition due to a substrate mounting error can be prevented. Moreover, the proper detection of mounting errors can prevent wasted time and gases (if there was no substrate), and prevent wafer breakage (if the substrate was improperly mounted during reactor closure). Thus, it is possible to prevent the substrate and the film from being damaged due to the substrate mounting error, thereby enhancing the device reliability.
While this invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be practical exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2007-0130392 | Dec 2007 | KR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3308709 | Harrick | Mar 1967 | A |
3822946 | Rynkowski | Jul 1974 | A |
3907439 | Zanoni | Sep 1975 | A |
3945505 | Frisbie et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4024944 | Adams et al. | May 1977 | A |
4107539 | Kirsch | Aug 1978 | A |
4148344 | Critchell et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4201378 | Hams | May 1980 | A |
4228886 | Moran | Oct 1980 | A |
4449885 | Hertel et al. | May 1984 | A |
4457664 | Judell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466073 | Boyan et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4507078 | Tam et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4523985 | Dimock | Jun 1985 | A |
4545106 | Juengel | Oct 1985 | A |
4559451 | Curl | Dec 1985 | A |
4618292 | Judge et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4635373 | Miyazaki et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4647268 | Scholl | Mar 1987 | A |
4697089 | Drage | Sep 1987 | A |
4698511 | Sueda et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4698775 | Koch et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4705951 | Layman et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720635 | Uga | Jan 1988 | A |
4730882 | Messerschmidt | Mar 1988 | A |
4743769 | Schwaiger | May 1988 | A |
4744713 | Hrovath | May 1988 | A |
4765793 | Goddeau | Aug 1988 | A |
4770590 | Hugues et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4789294 | Sato et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4818169 | Schram et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4819167 | Cheng et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4833790 | Spencer et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836733 | Hertel et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4838733 | Katz | Jun 1989 | A |
4880348 | Baker et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4907035 | Galburt et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4951601 | Maydan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5044752 | Thurfjell et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5162642 | Akamatsu et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5194743 | Aoyama et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5239182 | Tateyama et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5264918 | Kagami | Nov 1993 | A |
5483138 | Shmookler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5555051 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563798 | Berken et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5631171 | Sandstrom et al. | May 1997 | A |
5651086 | Russell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5706201 | Andrews | Jan 1998 | A |
5706930 | Sahoda et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710069 | Farkas et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5721607 | Ota | Feb 1998 | A |
5729337 | Tanaka | Mar 1998 | A |
5740062 | Berken et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5768125 | Zinger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783834 | Shatas | Jul 1998 | A |
5812714 | Hulse | Sep 1998 | A |
5822213 | Huynh | Oct 1998 | A |
5841540 | Mondie | Nov 1998 | A |
5844683 | Pavloski et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870488 | Rush et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870498 | Mayer | Feb 1999 | A |
5885353 | Strodtbeck et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900737 | Graham et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905850 | Kaveh | May 1999 | A |
5906860 | Motoda et al. | May 1999 | A |
5917601 | Shimazaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923694 | Culver | Jul 1999 | A |
5961169 | Kalenian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969639 | Lauf et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980194 | Freerks et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995234 | Nishi | Nov 1999 | A |
6026561 | Lafond | Feb 2000 | A |
6051074 | Strodtbeck et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6075606 | Doan | Jun 2000 | A |
6082950 | Altwood et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086064 | Biegelsen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090209 | Strodtbeck et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099596 | Li et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108092 | Sandhu | Aug 2000 | A |
6113165 | Wen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131589 | Vogtmann et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162008 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167322 | Holbrooks | Dec 2000 | A |
6172756 | Chalmers et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197117 | Li et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198976 | Sundar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220945 | Hirokawa et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242718 | Ferro et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267642 | Vogtmann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280291 | Gromko et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293749 | Raaijmakers et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6305898 | Yamagishi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322116 | Stevens | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327517 | Sundar | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331023 | Goodwin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332116 | Qian et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6438449 | Kawamatsu et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6502054 | Mooring et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6615113 | Kretz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624898 | Chen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6665583 | Kretz et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683654 | Haijima | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690986 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6728596 | Lindseth | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6771374 | Rangarajan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788891 | Mitsugi | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6823753 | Beginski | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6849151 | Barnes et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900877 | Raaijmakers | May 2005 | B2 |
6950774 | Donald | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961639 | Gaudon et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7008802 | Lu | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20020052052 | Robinson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040255853 | Ma et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060130750 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070037300 | Qin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070242281 | Beginski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090093906 | Takizawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090252580 | Takizawa et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 282 233 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 313 466 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0 597 637 | May 1994 | EP |
58-055270 | Apr 1983 | JP |
60-024518 | Feb 1985 | JP |
61-087352 | May 1986 | JP |
361125038 | Jun 1986 | JP |
61-184842 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61-228639 | Oct 1986 | JP |
62-073643 | Apr 1987 | JP |
403012946 | Jan 1991 | JP |
11-347975 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2005-093807 | Apr 2005 | JP |
WO 9952686 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0042638 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0068977 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090155452 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |