Technical Field
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to memory devices. More particularly, embodiments relate to throttling memory in a computer system.
Discussion
While recent trends in the computer industry toward smaller computing platforms and greater functionality have been desirable to consumers, these trends have presented a number of challenges to computer system designers as well as manufacturers. For example, designing notebook personal computers (PCs), personal digital assistants (PDAs) and wireless “smart” phones can be quite difficult due to the small form factor of these systems and their susceptibility to component overheating. In particular, excessive temperatures can cause processors, memory devices and other components to operate at a less than optimum performance level. In some cases, overheating can cause device failure. Overheating can also cause safety concerns with regard to the surface temperature of the platform enclosure. In addition, the applications being designed for computer systems continue to demand an increasing amount of power, which has a direct effect on temperature. For example, 3D gaming applications and “always-on” wireless features are just a sampling of the types of relatively high power applications available to consumers. When such applications are incorporated into small form factor computer systems, thermal concerns increase even more.
To better manage the above-described concerns, many computer designers establish a thermal design power (TDP) limit for a given platform, where the TDP essentially defines a power threshold that the platform should operate below in order to minimize overheating-related performance losses and safety concerns. In particular, it has been determined that accesses to memory units such as system memory can contribute significantly to the power consumption of the overall system. To address this problem, some solutions involve incorporating a temperature sensor into a memory controller hub (MCH), where the MCH controls accesses to the memory unit over a memory bus. If the temperature of the MCH exceeds a pre-set value, the memory unit is “throttled” by reducing memory access traffic to the memory unit.
While the above-described approach has been suitable under certain circumstances, a number of difficulties remain. For example, the temperature measured within the MCH does not reflect the actual internal temperature of the memory unit. As a result, correlating the measured temperature to the actual temperature can be difficult and may result in inaccuracies. Furthermore, to offset the risk of inaccurate temperature measurement, many designs involve overly conservative temperature limits and are therefore associated with significant performance losses. Another difficulty with the conventional approach relates to response time. In particular, some memory devices such as synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) devices have relatively high current surge transients that may require immediate shutdown in cases of overheating. The relatively long response time of the conventional approach, however, may not be able to detect the overheating in time because the temperature is measured at the MCH.
The various advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to one skilled in the art by reading the following specification and appended claims, and by referencing the following drawings, in which:
The illustrated temperature measurement module 14 measures an internal temperature of each of the memory devices 12. By measuring the internal temperature of the memory devices 12 rather than the internal temperature of a neighboring memory controller hub (MCH, not shown), the temperature measurement module 14 significantly obviates conventional concerns over accuracy and response time. For example, temperature measurements made by the module 14 more accurately reflect the die temperature of the memory devices 12, and can be used to detect overheating much more quickly than conventional temperature measurements.
Turning now to
In addition to storing configuration information (e.g., module size, data width, speed and voltage) used by the basic input/output system (BIOS, not shown) at system start-up, the SPD device 18 is able to transfer internal temperatures of the SDRAM devices 12′ to the system management interface 26. The system management interface 26 can generate throttling control signals if the internal temperatures exceed the temperature threshold, where the MCH 22 can reduce memory access traffic to (i.e., throttle) the SO-DIMM 10′ in response to the throttling control signals.
In particular, the illustrated system management interface 26 includes a system management bus 28 coupled to the SPD device 18 and a system controller (e.g., system management controller and keyboard controller, SMC/KBC) 30 coupled to the system management bus 28. The system controller 30 receives the internal temperatures from the SPD device 18 over the system management bus 28, compares the internal temperatures to the temperature threshold and generates the throttling control signals if the internal temperatures exceed the temperature threshold.
In one example, the system management bus 28 is an inter integrated circuit (I2C) bus (e.g., I2C Specification, Version 2.1, Phillips Semiconductors, January 2000), which can physically consist of two active wires and a ground connection. The active wires, termed serial data line (SDA) and serial clock line (SCL) are both bidirectional. In such an approach, each component connected to the bus can act as a receiver and/or transmitter depending on its functionality. In any given transaction, the component acting as a transmitter is considered the bus master and the remaining components are regarded as bus slaves. Thus, the SPD device 18 can function as a bus master and the system controller 30 can function as a bus slave with regard to the transfer of the internal temperatures. In cases where configuration information is being retrieved from an SPD electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM, not shown) for BIOS purposes, the system controller 30 may act as the bus master and the SPD device 18 may function as the bus slave.
The system management bus 28 can also operate under an SMBus framework (e.g., SMBus Specification, Version 2.0, SBS Implementers Forum, August 200). An SMBus interface uses I2C as its backbone, and enables components to pass messages back and forth rather than merely tripping individual control lines. Such an approach is particularly useful for memory units such as the SO-DIMM 10′, which transfers SPD data to BIOS.
The illustrated system management interface 26 also includes a chipset bus (e.g., Intel® low pin count/LPC Interface Specification, Rev. 1.1, August 2002) 32 coupled to the system controller 30, an input/output controller hub (ICH) 34 coupled the chipset bus 32 and a hub interface 36 coupled to the ICH 34 and the MCH 22. The ICH receives the throttling control signals from the system controller 30 over the chipset bus 32 and forwards the control signals to the MCH 22 over the hub interface 36. As already noted, the MCH 22 is able to throttle the SO-DIMM 10′ based on the control signals. In this regard, the system 16 may include other components (not shown) such as processors, graphics controllers, network interfaces, etc., that desire read and/or write access to the SDRAM devices 12′ on the SO-DIMM 10′ by way of the system memory bus 24 and/or MCH 22.
For example, a graphics controller could be processing a 3-dimensional (3D) gaming application that requires frequent accesses to one or more of the SDRAM devices 12′ over the system memory bus 24, where the MCH 22 has the ability to modulate traffic on the system memory bus 24. If the increased activity of the SDRAM devices 12′ results in an internal temperature of the SDRAM devices 12′ that is above a particular threshold, the system controller 30 generates a throttling initiation signal, which ultimately causes the MCH 22 to restrict memory access traffic on the system memory bus 24. By measuring the more accurate internal temperatures of the SDRAM devices 12′, the system 16 is able to implement more aggressive memory throttling. Furthermore, the system 16 is able to react to temperature spikes much more quickly than conventional systems.
Turning now to
The illustrated SPD device 18′ also has a multiplexer 40, which selects between the thermal diodes based on a selection signal from control logic 42. Selection can be in a “round-robin” fashion, or based on some other parameter such as memory device usage. In response to the selection signal, the multiplexer 40 connects the current source 38 to one of a pair of ports. For example, the control logic 42 can signal the multiplexer 40 to select ports DP1 and DN1, which may correspond to the anode and cathode terminals of thermal diode 20a (
In practice, additional circuitry may be used. For example, a low pass filter can be used to remove noise from the differential waveform and a chopper stabilized amplifier can be used to amplify and rectify the differential waveform to produce a direct current (DC) voltage proportional to the differential. Such circuitry has not been illustrated so as not to obscure more relevant aspects of the embodiments of the invention.
The ADC 44 can convert the temperature dependant voltage differential into a digital signal. Thus, each DP port can function as a combined current source and ADC positive input for a thermal diode channel, and each DN port can function as a combined current sink and ADC negative input. The control logic 42 may then proceed to the next pair of ports and the process is repeated. The illustrated SPD device 18′ also has a temperature calculation circuit 46 coupled to the ADC 44 to calculate the internal temperatures of the memory devices based on the digital signals.
Turning now to
Thus, the techniques described herein can be used to significantly improve memory throttling and thermal design power in systems such as servers, desktop PCs, notebook PCs, personal digital assistants (PDAs), wireless “smart” phones, and so on. In particular, the small form factors associated with notebook PCs, PDAs and smart phones particularly lend themselves to the embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, memory structures having relatively high current surge transients that may require immediate shutdown in cases of overheating, can benefit considerably from the principles discussed.
The term “coupled” is used herein to refer to any type of connection, direct or indirect, that enables communication to take place across the interface in question. Thus, coupling might include intermediate components. The coupling might also provide for electronic, electromagnetic, optic and other forms of communication.
Those skilled in the art can appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad techniques of the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while the embodiments of this invention have been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the embodiments of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, specification, and following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/495,510, filed on Jun. 30, 2009; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/924,754, filed on Oct. 26, 2007 and issued on Jun. 30, 2009, as U.S. Pat. No. 7,553,075; which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/825,923, filed May 24, 2004, issued on Dec. 4, 2007, as U.S. Pat. No. 7,304,905, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4843026 | Ong et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5680362 | Parris | Oct 1997 | A |
5787462 | Hafner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5809547 | Taoda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835963 | Yoshioka et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5897663 | Stancil | Apr 1999 | A |
5918982 | Nagati et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6008685 | Kunst | Dec 1999 | A |
6020834 | Rider et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021076 | Woo et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047373 | Hall et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060874 | Doorenbos | May 2000 | A |
6067593 | Schade | May 2000 | A |
6112164 | Hobson | Aug 2000 | A |
6122733 | Christeson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6149299 | Aslan | Nov 2000 | A |
6154821 | Barth | Nov 2000 | A |
6256731 | Hall et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283628 | Goodwin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314503 | D'Errico et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324620 | Christenson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373768 | Woo et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374338 | Garvey | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6452790 | Chu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453218 | Vergis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6507530 | Williams | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6567763 | Javanifard et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611911 | O'shea et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6662136 | Lamb et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6697254 | King | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6725320 | Barenys | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6757857 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6809978 | Alexander et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829547 | Law | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836704 | Walsh | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6870357 | Falik et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6888763 | Guo | May 2005 | B1 |
6895483 | Eguchi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6941432 | Ronstrom | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955164 | Kesler et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963959 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7032037 | Garnett | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032070 | Kodama | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035159 | Janzen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050959 | Pollard, II | May 2006 | B1 |
7064994 | Wu | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7099735 | Jain et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7135913 | Min et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7260007 | Jain | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266031 | Kim et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281846 | McLeod | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7304905 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7363531 | Vecoven | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7404071 | Janzen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412614 | Ku | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450456 | Jain et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454586 | Shi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7480792 | Janzen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7545617 | Foster | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553075 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7765825 | Wyatt | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8042999 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8185771 | Ramachandran | May 2012 | B2 |
8590332 | Wyatt | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8656072 | Hinkle | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010014049 | Woo et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010026576 | Beer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020059539 | Anderson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020108076 | Barenys | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020180543 | Song et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030060934 | Walsh | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076125 | McCord | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090879 | Doblar | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103402 | Tran et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030145194 | O'Shea et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158696 | Gold et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177293 | Bilak et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185058 | Leclerg | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210506 | Edmonds et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040141370 | Tran et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040215912 | Vergis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221198 | Vecoven | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267984 | Fukushima et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050050279 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081010 | DeWitt, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091438 | Chatterjee | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050138267 | Bains | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050216221 | Broyles et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246558 | Ku et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259718 | Phan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281096 | Bhakta | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060146629 | Lee | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060221741 | Jain et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239095 | Shi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265615 | Janzen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070204201 | Gower | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211548 | Jain et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080043556 | Nale | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043808 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080137256 | Foster | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080186562 | Moskowitz | Aug 2008 | A2 |
20100001786 | Ramachandran | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100128507 | Solomon | May 2010 | A1 |
20110054714 | Santos et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20140192583 | Rajan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140237205 | Takefman | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140304445 | Gervasi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1957318 | May 2007 | CN |
2000165420 | Jun 2000 | JP |
126564 | Nov 2006 | SG |
1319137 | Jan 2010 | TW |
0004481 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2005116800 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005116800 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/015886, mailed on Dec. 15, 2005, 13 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/015886, mailed on Dec. 7, 2006, 8 pages. |
European Search Report Received for European Patent Application No. 12156944.6, mailed on May 22, 2012, 6 pages. |
Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200580016090.2, mailed on Mar. 21, 2008, 5 pages of Office Action and 9 pages of English Translation. |
Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200580016090.2, mailed on Sep. 14, 2007, 10 pages of Office Action and 16 pages of English Translation. |
Microsoft, “Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition,” Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, 2002, 1 page. |
Notice of Grant received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200580016090.2, Aug. 8, 2008, 4 pages of Notice of Grant including 2 pages of English Translation. |
Notice of Grant received for Taiwan Patent Application No. 094114731, mailed on Oct. 26, 2009, 2 pages of Taiwan Notice of Grant Only. |
Office Action for European Patent Application No. 05749995.6, mailed on Mar. 31, 2016, 6 pages. |
Office Action for European Patent Application No. 12156944.6, mailed on Mar. 2, 2016, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/924,754, mailed on Oct. 1, 2008, 15 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/924,754, mailed on Feb. 21, 2008, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/924,754, mailed on Feb. 23, 2008, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/852,923, mailed on Apr. 9, 2007, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/852,923, mailed on Jul. 19, 2007, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/852,923, mailed on May 31, 2006, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Mar. 11, 2010, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Sep. 14, 2010, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on May 10, 2011, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Jan. 6, 2012, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on May 25, 2012, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Nov. 20, 2012, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Apr. 18, 2013, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Jan. 29, 2014, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Apr. 16, 2014, 3 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Sep. 11, 2014, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/495,510, mailed on Feb. 9, 2015, 9 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,510, mailed on Mar. 19, 2015, 2 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,737, mailed Oct. 6, 2006, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,737, mailed Jun. 4, 2007, 11 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,737, mailed Oct. 25, 2007, 3 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,737, mailed Feb. 21, 2008, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,737, mailed Jul. 31, 2008, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,737, mailed Dec. 8, 2008, 6 pages. |
Office Action for European Patent Application No. 05749995.6, mailed on Nov. 29, 2016, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140112370 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10852923 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11924754 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12495510 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 14142466 | US | |
Parent | 11924754 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 12495510 | US |