Vacuum system for immersion photolithography

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9507270
  • Patent Number
    9,507,270
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 26, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 29, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A vacuum system for extracting a stream of a multi-phase fluid from a photo-lithography tool comprises a pumping arrangement for drawing the fluid from the tool, and an extraction tank located upstream from the pumping arrangement for separating the fluid drawn from the tool into gas and liquid phases. The pumping arrangement comprises a first pump for extracting gas from the tank, and a second pump for extracting liquid from the tank. In order to minimize any pressure fluctuations transmitted from the vacuum system back to the fluid within the tool, a pressure control system maintains a substantially constant pressure in the tank by regulating the amounts of liquid and gas within the tank.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a vacuum system for extracting a multi-phase fluid, and more particularly for extracting a multi-phase fluid from an immersion photolithography exposure tool.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Photolithography is an important process step in semiconductor device fabrication. In photolithography, a circuit design is transferred to a wafer through a pattern imaged onto a photoresist layer deposited on the wafer surface. The wafer then undergoes various etch and deposition processes before a new design is transferred to the wafer surface. This cyclical process continues, building up multiple layers of the semiconductor device.


The minimum feature that may be printed using photolithography is determined by the resolution limit W, which is defined by the Rayleigh equation as:









W
=



k
1


λ

NA





(
1
)








where k1 is the resolution factor, λ is the wavelength of the exposing radiation and NA is the numerical aperture. In lithographic processes used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, it is therefore advantageous to use radiation of very short wavelength in order to improve optical resolution so that very small features in the device may be accurately reproduced. Monochromatic visible light of various wavelengths have been used, and more recently radiation in the deep ultra violet (DUV) range has been used, including radiation at 193 nm as generated using an ArF excimer laser.


The value of NA is determined by the acceptance angle (a) of the lens and the index of refraction (n) of the medium surrounding the lens, and is given by the equation:

NA=n sin α  (2)


For clean dry air (CDA), the value of n is 1, and so the physical limit to NA for a lithographic technique using CDA as a medium between the lens and the wafer is 1, with the practical limit being currently around 0.9.


Immersion photolithography is a known technique for improving optical resolution by increasing the value of NA. With reference to FIG. 1, in this technique a liquid 10 having a refractive index n>1 is placed between the lower surface of the objective lens 12 of a projection device 14 and the upper surface of a wafer 16 located on a moveable wafer stage 18. The liquid placed between lens 12 and wafer 16 should, ideally, have a low optical absorption at 193 nm, be compatible with the lens material and the photoresist deposited on the wafer surface, and have good uniformity. These criteria are met by ultra-pure, degassed water, which has a refractive index n≈1.44. The increased value of n, in comparison to a technique where the medium between lens and wafer is CDA, increases the value of NA, which in turn decreases the resolution limit W, enabling smaller features to be reproduced.


Due to outgassing from the photoresist layer and the generation of particulates during photolithography, it is desirable to maintain a steady flow of water between the lens 12 and the wafer 16. For example, as described in US 2004/0075895 the lens and wafer could be immersed in a bath of water supported by the wafer stage, with a pump used to recirculate the water within the bath. However, due to the weight of the water bath acting on the wafer stage, this technique is generally considered undesirable.


An alternative technique, as shown in FIG. 1, is to use a nozzle or showerhead device 20 connected to a water source and a vacuum system, shown generally at 22, to produce a localized stream of ultra-pure, degassed water between the lens 12 and the wafer 16. To prevent the ingress of water into other parts of the tool, for example, the mechanism used to move the wafer stage 18, one or more differential air seals 24 are used. As a result, the vacuum system 22 extracts from the tool a multi-phase mixture of water and CDA. However, the extraction of such a multi-phase mixture from the tool using a single vacuum pump, especially in slug or churn regime flows, can generate undesirable pressure and flow fluctuations upstream of the pump, which could be transmitted back to the tool. This could lead to errors in the photolithography process, for example, through variations in the refractive index of the medium located between the lens and the wafer, or through the transmission of mechanical vibrations to the tool.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a vacuum system for extracting a stream of a multi-phase fluid from a photolithography tool and which can minimize any pressure fluctuations imparted thereby to fluid within the tool.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect, the present invention provides a system for extracting a stream of multi-phase fluid from a photo-lithography tool, the system comprising a pumping arrangement for drawing the fluid from the tool, separating means located upstream from the pumping arrangement for separating the fluid drawn from the tool into gas and liquid phases, the pumping arrangement comprising a first pumping unit for extracting gas from the separating means and a second pumping unit for extracting liquid from the separating means, and a pressure control system for controlling the pressure within the separating means by regulating the amounts of gas and liquid therewithin.


In order to minimize any pressure fluctuations transmitted from the system back to the fluid within the tool, the pressure control system can maintain a substantially constant pressure in the separating means by regulating the amounts of liquid and gas within the separating means.


In order to control the amount of gas within the separating means, the pressure control system preferably comprises means for supplying gas to the separating means from a source thereof, and control means for controlling the flow of gas to the separating means. For example, where there is a variation in the flow of fluid into the separating means, and/or a variation in the flow of gas from the separating means, gas can be introduced into the separating means from the external source to compensate for such variations. In a preferred embodiment, the pressure control system comprises a variable flow control device, such as a butterfly or other control valve, through which gas is supplied to the separating means, with the control means being configured to vary the conductance of the valve to control the pressure within the separating means. For example, a controller may be configured to receive a signal indicative of the pressure within the separating means, and to control the conductance of the valve in dependence on the received signal. This signal may be received from a pressure sensor, capacitance manometer or other form of sensor of sufficient sensitivity to achieve the required level of pressure control.


As well as, or as an alternative to, controlling the supply of gas to the separating means, the controller is preferably configured to control the flow of gas from the separating means in dependence on the received signal. For example, another variable flow control device may be provided, through which gas is extracted from the tank by the first pumping unit, with the controller being configured to control the conductance of this variable flow control device.


In order to control the amount of liquid in the separating means, the pressure control system preferably comprises means for supplying liquid to the separating means from a source thereof, and control means for controlling the flow of liquid to the separating means. For example, in order to minimize pressure variations due to the extraction of liquid from the separating means by the second pumping unit, the control means is preferably configured to maintain a substantially constant level of liquid within the separating means. In another preferred embodiment, the liquid supply means comprises a variable flow control device such as a butterfly or other control valve, through which liquid is supplied to the separating means, with the control means being configured to vary the conductance of the valve to control the level of liquid within the separating means. For example, a controller may be configured to receive a signal indicative of the level of liquid within the separating means, and to control the conductance of the valve in dependence on the received signal. This signal may be received from a level meter, float detector, or other form of sensor of sufficient sensitivity to allow a substantially constant level of liquid to be maintained within the separating means.


One or more flexible tubes are preferably used to convey fluid (single and/or multi-phase) between the components of the system. For example, a flexible tube may be used to convey the multi-phase fluid to the separating means. Further flexible tubes may also be used to convey the single phase streams from the separating means to respective pumping units. This can minimize the transmission of vibrations generated during use of the system back to the fluid within the tool.


In another aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for extracting a stream of multi-phase fluid from a photo-lithography tool, the method comprising the steps of: connecting a pumping arrangement to the tool via an extraction tank; operating the pumping arrangement to draw the fluid from the tool; separating the fluid drawn from the tool into gas and liquid phases within the extraction tank, the pumping arrangement extracting separately gas and liquid from the extraction tank; and controlling the pressure within the extraction tank by regulating the amounts of gas and liquid therewithin.


Features described above in relation to system aspects of the invention are equally applicable to method aspects, and vice versa.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a known system for immersion photolithography; and



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the present invention vacuum system for extracting a multi-phase fluid from an immersion photolithography tool.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

With reference to FIG. 2, a system 30 for extracting a multi-phase fluid from an immersion photolithography tool comprises a separating means depicted for purposes of illustration as an extraction tank 32 for receiving the multi-stream fluid drawn from the tool by a pumping arrangement located downstream from the tank 32. The tank 32 is connected to the tool by flexible tubing 34 so as to minimize the amount of mechanical coupling between the system 30 and the tool, and thereby minimize the transmission of vibrations generated during use of the system 30 back to the tool.


The tank 32 is configured to separate the liquid and gas phases within the fluid received from the tool. In this example, the fluid received from the tool comprises a mixture of clean dry air (CDA) and ultra-pure water, and so the tank 32 contains any suitable material and/or structure for affecting the separation of the CDA from the water. However, the tank 32 may be configured to separate a different liquid-gas mixture received from the tool. For example, the liquid may comprise an aqueous or non-aqueous solution, and the gas may be other than CDA.


The pumping arrangement comprises a first pumping unit 36 for extracting gas from the tank 32, and a second pumping unit 38 for extracting liquid from the tank 32.


The first pumping unit 36 may comprise any suitable pump for extracting the gas from the tank 32, and is preferably chosen for compatibility with the gas extracted from the tank 32, which is likely to be saturated with liquid vapour, for minimum transmission of pressure fluctuations back to the gas contained in the tank 32, and for relatively long maintenance periods. In this embodiment, the first pumping unit 36 may conveniently comprise an air-powered ejector pump or a water-based liquid ring pump for extracting CDA from the tank 32. In order to inhibit the transfer of vibrations to the tank 32 during use, the first pumping unit 36 is connected to the tank using flexible tubing 40. As the gas exhaust from the first pumping unit 36 may be saturated or supersaturated with liquid vapour, in this embodiment water vapour, a separator vessel 42 may be connected to the exhaust of the first pumping unit 36, the vessel 42 containing any suitable material and/or structure for affecting the separation of water vapour from the CDA. The water extracted from the CDA is exhaust to a drain, and the CDA is vented to the atmosphere.


The second pumping unit 38 may comprise any suitable pump for extracting the liquid from the tank 32, and is preferably chosen for compatibility with the liquid extracted from the tank 32 and for relatively long maintenance periods. In this embodiment where the liquid is water, the second pumping unit 38 may conveniently comprise a water-powered ejector pump or a diaphragm pump for extracting water from the tank 32. In order to inhibit the transfer of vibrations to the tank 32 during use, the second pumping unit 38 is connected to the tank using flexible tubing 44. The internal diameter of the flexible tubing 44 may be chosen to restrict the flow rate of liquid from the tank 32 to the second pumping unit 38. Alternatively, or in addition, a fixed or variable flow restrictor may be located between the tank 32 and the second pumping unit 38.


In order to minimize any pressure fluctuations transmitted from the system 30 back to the fluid within the tool, the system 30 includes a pressure control system for maintain a substantially constant pressure in the tank 32. In this embodiment, this is achieved by regulating the amounts of liquid and gas within the tank 32.


The amount of liquid contained in the tank 32 is maintained at a substantially constant level by a controller 46, thereby maintaining a substantially constant volume of gas in the tank 32. The controller 46 is connected to a sensor 48 for detecting the amount of liquid with the tank 32. The sensor 48 may comprise, for example, a level meter, float meter or other form of suitable sensor. The sensor 48 outputs a signal to the controller 46 indicative of the level of the liquid within the tank 32. In response to this signal, the controller 46 outputs to a variable flow control device 50 located between the tank 32 and a pressurised external liquid source 52 connected to the tank 32 a signal which causes the device 50 to vary the flow of liquid, in this embodiment water, to the tank 32. For example, the device 50 may be a butterfly or other control valve having a conductance that can be varied in dependence on, preferably in proportion to, the signal received from the controller 46. By varying the flow rate of the water to the tank from the external source 52, the controller 46 can compensate for any variation in the flow rate of fluid to the tank 32 from the tool and/or any variation in the rate of extraction of liquid from the tank 32 by the second pumping unit 38, and thus maintain the liquid in the tank 32 at a substantially constant level. The controller 46 may be arranged to process the signal received from the sensor 48 to compensate for any ripples generated in the surface of the liquid during use.


With the gas occupying a substantially constant volume within the tank 32, any variations in the amount of gas contained in the multi-phase fluid received from the tank, and/or any in the rate of extraction of gas from the tank 32 by the first pumping unit 36, and any temperature fluctuations within the tank 32, could vary the pressure of the gas within the tank 32, and impart pressure and flow fluctuations to the fluid in the tool. The pressure control system is therefore configured to maintain a substantially constant pressure within the tank 32 by also regulating the amount of gas within the tank 32.


To achieve this, the pressure control system comprises a controller 54 connected to a sensor 56 for detecting the gas pressure with the tank 32. The sensor 56 may comprise, for example, a pressure sensor, a capacitance manometer or other form of sensor of sufficient sensitivity to achieve the required level of pressure control. The sensor 56 outputs a signal to the controller 54 indicative of the gas pressure within the tank 32. In response to this signal, the controller 54 outputs to a variable flow control device 58 located between the tank 32 and a pressurised external gas source 60 connected to the tank 32 a signal which causes the device 58 to vary the flow of gas, in this embodiment CDA, to the tank 32. A further variable flow control device 62 may be located between the tank 32 and the first pumping unit 36 and configured to receive a signal from the controller 54 to vary the flow of gas from the tank 32. For example, the devices 58, 62 may also be butterfly or other control valves having a conductance that can be varied in dependence on, preferably in proportion to, the signal received from the controller, 54. By controlling the flow of gas into and out from the tank 32, the controller 54 can maintain a substantially constant gas pressure within the tank 32.


System 30 provides the capability of extracting a multi-phase fluid from the immersion lithography tool while minimizing any pressure fluctuations imparted thereby to the fluid within the tool.


While the foregoing description and drawings represent the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A lithographic apparatus, comprising: a projection device configured to project a radiation beam onto a substrate; anda system to extract multi-phase fluid from a part of the lithographic apparatus system, the system comprising: a pump system configured to draw the fluid from the part,a separator configured to separate the fluid drawn from the part into gas and liquid phases, anda control system configured to control the pressure within the separator by regulating the gas and/or liquid therein.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a gas supply configured to supply gas to the separator from a source thereof, and the control system is configured to control flow of the gas to the separator.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the control system is configured to control flow of gas from the separator.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a liquid supply configured to supply liquid to the separator from a source thereof, and the control system is configured to control flow of liquid to the separator.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the control system is configured to control the amount of liquid within the separator.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the separator comprises an extraction tank.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising an outlet configured to remove a multi-phase fluid from a space between the projection device and the substrate.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising an inlet configured to supply liquid to a space between the projection device and a surface facing the projection device, wherein the pump system is configured to remove the multi-phase fluid from the space between the projection device and the surface facing the projection device.
  • 9. A method of extracting a stream of multi-phase fluid from a part of a photolithography tool, the method comprising: operating a pumping arrangement to draw the fluid from the part of the tool;separating the fluid drawn from the part of the tool into gas and liquid phases within a separator chamber; andcontrolling the pressure within the separator chamber by regulating the gas and/or liquid therewithin.
  • 10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the pressure within the separator chamber is controlled by regulating a supply of gas from a source thereof to the separator chamber.
  • 11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the pressure within the separator chamber is controlled by regulating the flow of gas from the separator chamber.
  • 12. The method according to claim 9, wherein the pressure within the separator chamber is controlled by regulating a supply of liquid to the separator chamber from a source thereof.
  • 13. The method according to claim 9, wherein the pressure within the separator chamber is controlled by controlling an amount of liquid within the separator chamber.
  • 14. The method according to claim 9, further comprising supplying liquid to a space between the projection device of the tool and a surface facing the projection device, and wherein the multi-phase fluid is drawn from the space between the projection device and the surface facing the projection device.
  • 15. A lithography apparatus, comprising: a projection device configured to project a radiation beam onto a substrate;an outlet configured to remove a mixture of liquid and gas; andan evacuation extraction system configured to draw the mixture through the outlet, the evacuation extraction system comprising a separator chamber arranged to separate liquid from gas in the removed mixture and a control system configured to maintain a substantially stable pressure within the separator chamber.
  • 16. The apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the control system is configured to control flow of gas from the separator chamber to regulate the pressure within the separator chamber.
  • 17. The apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the control system is configured to control the amount of liquid within the separator to regulate the pressure within the separator chamber.
  • 18. The apparatus according to claim 15, further comprising an inlet configured to supply liquid to a space between the projection device and a surface facing the projection device, wherein the outlet is configured to remove the multi-phase fluid from the space between the projection device and the surface facing the projection device.
  • 19. The apparatus according to claim 15, further comprising a flow restriction in the fluid path between the separator chamber and a pump fluidly connected to the separator chamber.
  • 20. The apparatus according to claim 15, further comprising a sensor configured to measure the liquid in the separator chamber.
  • 21. The apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the separator chamber further comprises an outlet for liquid and further comprising a pump fluidly connected to the outlet, the pump configured to extract liquid through the outlet.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/187,166, filed Jul. 20, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/340,326, filed Dec. 19, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,164,734, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/869,191, filed on Jun. 16, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,481,867. The entire contents of each of the foregoing applications is herein fully incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (76)
Number Name Date Kind
3314219 Griffin, III et al. Apr 1967 A
3573975 Dhaka et al. Apr 1971 A
3648587 Stevens Mar 1972 A
3675395 Baranowski Jul 1972 A
4315760 Bij De Leij Feb 1982 A
4346164 Tabarelli et al. Aug 1982 A
4390273 Loebach et al. Jun 1983 A
4396705 Akeyama et al. Aug 1983 A
4466253 Jaster Aug 1984 A
4480910 Takanashi et al. Nov 1984 A
4509852 Tabarelli et al. Apr 1985 A
4641679 Arnaudeau et al. Feb 1987 A
4696684 Shen Sep 1987 A
4704140 Kujala Nov 1987 A
4730634 Russell Mar 1988 A
4886530 Dussourd Dec 1989 A
5040020 Rauschenbach et al. Aug 1991 A
5610683 Takahashi Mar 1997 A
5715039 Fukuda et al. Feb 1998 A
5825043 Suwa Oct 1998 A
5900354 Batchelder May 1999 A
6033475 Hasebe et al. Mar 2000 A
6191429 Suwa Feb 2001 B1
6236634 Lee et al. May 2001 B1
6560032 Hatano May 2003 B2
6600547 Watson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603130 Bisschops et al. Aug 2003 B1
6633365 Suenaga Oct 2003 B2
6716268 Molyneux et al. Apr 2004 B2
6788477 Lin Sep 2004 B2
6954256 Flagello et al. Oct 2005 B2
7053983 Tokita May 2006 B2
7125438 Skoglund et al. Oct 2006 B2
7292313 Poon et al. Nov 2007 B2
7379155 Mertens et al. May 2008 B2
7481867 Harpham Jan 2009 B2
8164734 Harpham Apr 2012 B2
8830440 Harpham Sep 2014 B2
8934082 Mertens Jan 2015 B2
20020020821 Van Santen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020163629 Switkes et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030123040 Almogy Jul 2003 A1
20030174408 Rostalski et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040000627 Schuster Jan 2004 A1
20040021844 Suenaga Feb 2004 A1
20040069330 Rolfson Apr 2004 A1
20040075895 Lin Apr 2004 A1
20040109237 Epple et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040114117 Bleeker Jun 2004 A1
20040119954 Kawashima et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125351 Krautschik Jul 2004 A1
20040135099 Simon et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040136494 Lof et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040154641 Montierth Aug 2004 A1
20040160582 Lof et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165159 Lof et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040207824 Lof et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211920 Maria Derksen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050024609 De Smit et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050048220 Mertens et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050110973 Streefkerk et al. May 2005 A1
20050132914 Mulkens et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134815 Van Santen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134817 Nakamura Jun 2005 A1
20050140948 Tokita Jun 2005 A1
20050225734 De Smit et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060038968 Kemper et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060082746 Mertens et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060152697 Poon et al. Jul 2006 A1
20070139628 Nagasaka et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070195301 Nagasaka Aug 2007 A1
20070222957 Nagasaka et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070222967 Poon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070263195 Nagasaka et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080259292 Mertens et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266533 Nagasaka et al. Oct 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (81)
Number Date Country
206 607 Feb 1984 DE
221 563 Apr 1985 DE
224448 Jul 1985 DE
242880 Feb 1987 DE
0023231 Feb 1981 EP
0418427 Mar 1991 EP
0 605 103 Jul 1994 EP
1039511 Sep 2000 EP
1 486 827 Dec 2004 EP
1 489 462 Dec 2004 EP
1 491 957 Dec 2004 EP
1 528 433 May 2005 EP
1 571 701 Sep 2005 EP
1 571 701 Sep 2005 EP
2474708 Jul 1981 FR
58-202448 Nov 1983 JP
A 59-19912 Feb 1984 JP
62-065326 Mar 1987 JP
62-121417 Jun 1987 JP
63-157419 Jun 1988 JP
04-305915 Oct 1992 JP
04-305917 Oct 1992 JP
A 05-62877 Mar 1993 JP
06-124873 May 1994 JP
07-132262 May 1995 JP
07-220990 Aug 1995 JP
08-000907 Jan 1996 JP
A 08-316125 Nov 1996 JP
10-228661 Aug 1998 JP
10-255319 Sep 1998 JP
10-303114 Nov 1998 JP
10-340846 Dec 1998 JP
11-176727 Jul 1999 JP
2000-058436 Feb 2000 JP
2001-091849 Apr 2001 JP
2002-257137 Sep 2002 JP
2002257138 Sep 2002 JP
2004-165666 Jun 2004 JP
2004-193252 Jul 2004 JP
2004-282023 Oct 2004 JP
2004-289126 Oct 2004 JP
2004-289127 Oct 2004 JP
A-2004-320016 Nov 2004 JP
A-2004-320017 Nov 2004 JP
2005-005713 Jan 2005 JP
2005-057278 Mar 2005 JP
2005-101488 Apr 2005 JP
2005-175176 Jun 2005 JP
2005-191344 Jul 2005 JP
EI2005-223315 Aug 2005 JP
2005-268759 Sep 2005 JP
2005-277363 Oct 2005 JP
2006-060223 Mar 2006 JP
2006-165500 Jun 2006 JP
2007-504662 Mar 2007 JP
1996-0024699 Jul 1996 KR
2004-0044119 May 2004 KR
2004-0047713 Jun 2004 KR
WO 9949504 Sep 1999 WO
WO 03077036 Sep 2003 WO
WO 03077037 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004019128 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004053596 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053950 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053951 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053952 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053953 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053954 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053955 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053956 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053957 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053958 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053959 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004055803 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004057589 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004057590 Jul 2004 WO
2005006415 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005015315 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005024517 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005111722 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005122221 Dec 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (39)
Entry
Communication from the European Patent Office informing of the intention to grant a EP patent for European Patent Application No. 05747245.8, dated Dec. 4, 2009.
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,626, dated Oct. 1, 2008.
English Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-301607, dated Mar. 9, 2009.
Information Disclosure Statement as filed on Dec. 21, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,626.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node”, 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002.
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography”, TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002.
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997.
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography”, SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269.
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72.
S. Owa et al., “Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues”, SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003.
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003).
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions”, May 15, 2003.
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity”, Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36.
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309.
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Lithography”, NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33.
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts”, EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004.
B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002).
European Search Report issued for European Patent Application No. 05256461.4-2222 dated Feb. 16, 2006.
Information Disclosure Statement filed Apr. 19, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722.
S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool”, Litho Forum, International Sematech, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51.
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools”, Litho Forum, International Sematech, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22.
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update”, SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004.
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521.
B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm”, Future Fab International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003.
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys, vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177.
G. Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036.
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash”, Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3.
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Oct. 25, 2010.
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Feb. 4, 2010.
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Oct. 14, 2008.
U.S. Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,722, dated Apr. 17, 2008.
Japanese Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2011 in related Japanese patent application No. 2007-516020.
Canon KK; Abstract of JP 2002257138 entitled Static Pressure Fluid Bearing Device, Stage Device Using the Same, Exposure Device, and Manufacturing Method for Device, dated Sep. 11, 2002.
United Kingdom Patent Office Search Report for Application No. GB 0414967.0, dated Oct. 12, 2004.
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2011 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201010143405.2.
Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-063578.
Korean Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2013 in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7011954.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140362358 A1 Dec 2014 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13187166 Jul 2011 US
Child 14469389 US
Parent 12340326 Dec 2008 US
Child 13187166 US
Parent 10869191 Jun 2004 US
Child 12340326 US