Vessels, contact surfaces, and coating and inspection apparatus and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9272095
  • Patent Number
    9,272,095
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 30, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 1, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Methods for processing a contact surface, for example to provide a gas barrier or lubricity or to modify the wetting properties on a medical device, are disclosed. First and second PECVD or other contact surface processing stations or devices and a contact surface holder comprising a contact surface port are provided. An opening of the contact surface can be seated on the contact surface port. The interior contact surface of the seated contact surface can be processed via the contact surface port by the first and second processing stations or devices. contact surface barrier, lubricity and hydrophobic coatings and coated contact surfaces, for example syringes and medical sample collection tubes are disclosed. A contact surface processing system and contact surface inspection apparatus and methods are also disclosed.
Description

The present invention relates to the technical field of fabrication of coated contact surfaces of a medical device, for example a vessel and/or other device for storing or contacting biologically active compounds or body fluids. For example, the invention relates to a contact surface processing system for coating of a contact surface, a contact surface processing system for coating and inspection of a contact surface, a portable contact surface holder for a contact surface processing system, to a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition apparatus for coating a contact surface of a medical device, for example a vessel, to a method for coating an interior contact surface of a vessel, to a method for coating and inspection of a vessel or contact surface, to a method of processing a vessel or contact surface, to the use of a vessel or contact surface processing system, to a computer-readable medium and to a program element.


The present disclosure also relates to improved methods for processing medical devices, for example vessels, for example multiple identical vessels used for venipuncture and other medical sample collection, pharmaceutical preparation storage and delivery, and other purposes. Such vessels or contact surfaces are used in large numbers for these purposes, and must be relatively economical to manufacture and yet highly reliable in storage and use.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Evacuated blood collection tubes are used for drawing blood from a patient for medical analysis. The tubes are sold evacuated. The patient's blood is communicated to the interior of a tube by inserting one end of a double-ended hypodermic needle into the patient's blood vessel and impaling the closure of the evacuated blood collection tube on the other end of the double-ended needle. The vacuum in the evacuated blood collection tube draws the blood (or more precisely, the blood pressure of the patient pushes the blood) through the needle into the evacuated blood collection tube, increasing the pressure within the tube and thus decreasing the pressure difference causing the blood to flow. The blood flow typically continues until the tube is removed from the needle or the pressure difference is too small to support flow.


Evacuated blood collection tubes should have a substantial shelf life to facilitate efficient and convenient distribution and storage of the tubes prior to use. For example, a one-year shelf life is desirable, and progressively longer shelf lives, such as 18 months, 24 months, or 36 months, are also desired in some instances. The tube desirably remains essentially fully evacuated, at least to the degree necessary to draw enough blood for analysis (a common standard is that the tube retains at least 90% of the original draw volume), for the full shelf life, with very few (optimally no) defective tubes being provided.


A defective tube is likely to cause the phlebotomist using the tube to fail to draw sufficient blood. The phlebotomist might then need to obtain and use one or more additional tubes to obtain an adequate blood sample.


Prefilled syringes are commonly prepared and sold so the syringe does not need to be filled before use. The syringe can be prefilled with saline solution, a dye for injection, or a pharmaceutically active preparation, for some examples.


Commonly, the prefilled syringe is capped at the distal end, as with a cap, and is closed at the proximal end by its drawn plunger. The prefilled syringe can be wrapped in a sterile package before use. To use the prefilled syringe, the packaging and cap are removed, optionally a hypodermic needle or another delivery conduit is attached to the distal end of the barrel, the delivery conduit or syringe is moved to a use position (such as by inserting the hypodermic needle into a patient's blood vessel or into apparatus to be rinsed with the contents of the syringe), and the plunger is advanced in the barrel to inject the contents of the barrel.


One important consideration in manufacturing pre-filled syringes is that the contents of the syringe desirably will have a substantial shelf life, during which it is important to isolate the material filling the syringe from the barrel wall containing it, to avoid leaching material from the barrel into the prefilled contents or vice versa.


Since many of these vessels or contact surfaces are inexpensive and used in large quantities, for certain applications it will be useful to reliably obtain the necessary shelf life without increasing the manufacturing cost to a prohibitive level. It is also desirable for certain applications to move away from glass vessels or contact surfaces, which can break and are expensive to manufacture, in favor of plastic vessels or contact surfaces which are rarely broken in normal use (and if broken do not form sharp shards from remnants of the vessel, like a glass tube would). Glass vessels have been favored because glass is more gas tight and inert to pre-filled contents than untreated plastics. Also, due to its traditional use, glass is well accepted, as it is known to be relatively innocuous when contacted with medical samples or pharmaceutical preparations and the like.


A further consideration when regarding syringes is to ensure that the plunger can move at a constant speed and with a constant force when it is pressed into the barrel. For this purpose, a lubricity layer, either on one or on both of the barrel and the plunger, is desirable.


Similar considerations apply for other medical devices, particularly those used in contact with a patient's tissue or body fluids, either in vivo or in vitro. Many such devices have surfaces that require a barrier coating, lubricity, and/or a surface characteristic compatible with body fluids and tissues.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the present invention is a medical device comprising a substrate defining a contact surface and a lubricity layer deposited on the contact surface. The contact surface is a point or area of contact between the substrate and a fluid or tissue when the medical device is in use. The lubricity layer is deposited on the contact surface and configured to provide a lower sliding force or breakout force for the contact surface than for the uncoated substrate.


The lubricity layer has one of the following atomic ratios, measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), SiwOxCy or SiwNxCy, where w is 1, x in this formula is from about 0.5 to 2.4, and y is from about 0.6 to about 3. The lubricity layer has a thickness by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) between 10 and 1000 nm. The lubricity layer deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) under conditions effective to form a coating from a precursor. The precursor is selected from a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, a silatrane, a silquasilatrane, a silproatrane, an azasilatrane, an azasilquasiatrane, an azasilproatrane, or a combination of any two or more of these precursors.


Another aspect of the invention is a medical device comprising a substrate defining a contact surface as defined above and a barrier layer deposited on the contact surface. The barrier layer is configured to reduce the transmission of a fluid to or from the contact surface.


The barrier layer has one of the following atomic ratios, measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), SiOx or SiNx, where x is from about 0.5 to 2.4. The barrier layer has a thickness by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) between 1 and 1000 nm. The barrier layer is deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) under conditions effective to form a coating from a precursor. As defined above.


Still another aspect of the invention is a medical device comprising contact surface as previously defined. The contact surface is a hydrophobic layer having the composition: SiOxCy or SiNxCy, where x in this formula is from about 0.5 to 2.4 and y is from about 0.6 to about 3. The contact surface is of the type made by providing a precursor as defined above, applying the precursor to a contact surface, and polymerizing or crosslinking the coating, or both, to form a hydrophobic contact surface having a higher contact angle than the untreated contact surface.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a vessel holder in a coating station according to an embodiment of the disclosure.



FIG. 2 is an exploded longitudinal sectional view of a syringe and cap adapted for use as a prefilled syringe.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a blood collection tube assembly having a closure according to still another embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a fragmentary section of the blood collection tube and closure assembly of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is an isolated section of an elastomeric insert of the closure of FIGS. 3 and 4.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a double-walled blood collection tube assembly according to still another embodiment of the invention.





The following reference characters are used in the drawing figures:















28
Coating station


80
Vessel


82
Opening


84
Closed end


86
Wall


88
Interior contact surface


90
Barrier layer


92
Vessel port


94
Vacuum duct


96
Vacuum port


98
Vacuum source


100
O-ring (of 92)


102
O-ring (of 96)


104
Gas inlet port


106
O-ring (of 100)


108
Probe (counter electrode)


110
Gas delivery port (of 108)


114
Housing (of 50 or 112)


116
Collar


118
Exterior contact surface (of 80)


144
PECVD gas source


160
Electrode


162
Power supply


164
Sidewall (of 160)


166
Sidewall (of 160)


168
Closed end (of 160)


80
Vessel


84
Closed end


250
Syringe barrel


252
Syringe


254
Interior contact surface (of 250)


256
Back end (of 250)


258
Plunger (of 252)


260
Front end (of 250)


262
Cap


264
Interior contact surface (of 262)


268
Vessel


270
Closure


272
Interior facing contact surface


274
Lumen


276
Wall-contacting contact surface


278
Inner contact surface (of 280)


280
Vessel wall


282
Stopper


284
Shield


286
Lubricity layer


288
Barrier layer


408
Inner wall (FIG. 6)


410
Outer wall (FIG. 6)


412
Interior contact surface (FIG. 6)









DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which several embodiments are shown. This invention can, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth here. Rather, these embodiments are examples of the invention, which has the full scope indicated by the language of the claims. Like numbers refer to like or corresponding elements throughout.


DEFINITION SECTION

In the context of the present invention, the following definitions and abbreviations are used:


RF is radio frequency; sccm is standard cubic centimeters per minute.


The term “at least” in the context of the present invention means “equal or more” than the integer following the term. The word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality unless indicated otherwise.


“First” and “second” or similar references to, e.g., processing stations or processing devices refer to the minimum number of processing stations or devices that are present, but do not necessarily represent the order or total number of processing stations and devices. These terms do not limit the number of processing stations or the particular processing carried out at the respective stations.


For purposes of the present invention, an “organosilicon precursor” is a compound having at least one of the linkage:




embedded image



which is a tetravalent silicon atom connected to an oxygen atom and an organic carbon atom (an organic carbon atom being a carbon atom bonded to at least one hydrogen atom). A volatile organosilicon precursor, defined as such a precursor that can be supplied as a vapor in a PECVD apparatus, is an optional organosilicon precursor. Optionally, the organosilicon precursor is selected from the group consisting of a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, an alkyl trimethoxysilane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, and a combination of any two or more of these precursors.


In the context of the present invention, “essentially no oxygen” or (synonymously) “substantially no oxygen” is added to the gaseous reactant in some embodiments. This means that some residual atmospheric oxygen can be present in the reaction space, and residual oxygen fed in a previous step and not fully exhausted can be present in the reaction space, which are defined here as essentially no oxygen present. Essentially no oxygen is present in the gaseous reactant if the gaseous reactant comprises less than 1 vol. % O2, for example less than 0.5 vol. % O2, and optionally is O2-free. If no oxygen is added to the gaseous reactant, or if no oxygen at all is present during PECVD, this is also within the scope of “essentially no oxygen.”


A “vessel” in the context of the present invention is a subset exemplary of the broader set of medical devices as defined herein. A vessel per se can be any type of article that is adapted to contain or convey a material. The material can be a liquid, a gas, a solid, or any two or more of these. One example of a vessel is an article with at least one opening and a wall defining an interior contact surface. Optionally, at least a portion of the interior contact surface defines a “contact surface” which is treated according to the present disclosure. The term “at least” in the context of the present invention means “equal or more” than the integer following the term. Thus, a vessel in the context of the present invention has one or more openings.


One or two openings, like the openings of a sample tube (one opening) or a syringe barrel (two openings) are preferred. If the vessel has two or more openings, they can be of same or different size. If there is more than one opening, one opening can be used for the gas inlet for a PECVD coating method according to the present invention, while the other openings are either capped or open.


A vessel according to the present invention can be a sample tube, e.g. for collecting or storing biological fluids like blood or urine, a syringe (or a part thereof, for example a syringe barrel) for storing or delivering a biologically active compound or composition, e.g. a medicament or pharmaceutical composition, a vial for storing biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions, a pipe, e.g. a catheter for transporting biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions, or a cuvette for holding fluids, e.g. for holding biological materials or biologically active compounds or compositions.


A vessel can be of any shape. One example of a vessel has a substantially cylindrical wall adjacent to at least one of its open ends. Generally, the interior wall of a vessel of this type is cylindrically shaped, like, e.g. in a sample tube or a syringe barrel. Sample tubes and syringes or their parts (for example syringe barrels), vials, and petri dishes, which commonly are generally cylindrical, are contemplated.


Some other non-limiting examples of contemplated vessels include well or non-well slides or plates, for example titer plates or microtiter plates. Still other non-limiting examples of contemplated vessels include pump contact surfaces in contact with the pumped material, including impeller contact surfaces, pump chamber contact surfaces and the like. Even other non-limiting examples of contemplated vessels include parts of an fluid containment, pumping, processing, filtering, and delivery system, such as an intravenous fluid delivery system, a blood processing system (such as a heart-lung machine or a blood component separator) a dialysis system, or an insulin delivery system, as several examples. Examples of such vessel parts are tubing, pump interior contact surfaces, drug or saline containing bags or bottles, adapters and tubing connectors for connecting parts of the system together, intravenous needles and needle assemblies, membranes and filters, etc. Other examples of vessels include measuring and delivery devices such as pipettes.


The invention has more general application to “contact surfaces” of medical devices and the like used or usable in contact with human or animal fluids or tissues, whether or not associated with a vessel. Some additional non-limiting examples of devices having contact surfaces are devices inserted in an orifice, through the skin, or otherwise within the body of a human or animal, such as thermometers, probes, guidewires, catheters, electrical leads, surgical drains, pacemakers, defibrillators, orthopedic devices such as screws, plates, and rods, clothing, face masks, eye shields, and other equipment worn by medical personnel, surgical drapes, sheet or fabric material used to make the same, surgical instruments such as saws and saw blades, drills and drill bits, etc.


The invention further has application to any contact surfaces of devices used or usable in contact with pharmaceutical preparations or other materials, such as ampoules, vials, syringes, bottles, bags, or other containment vessels, stirring rods, impellers, stirring pellets, etc., also within the definition of “contact surfaces.”


Some specific medical devices having fluid or tissue contacting surfaces that can be treated according to the present disclosure follow:


ACL/PCL Reconstruction Systems


Adapters


Adhesion barriers


Agar Petri dishes


Anesthesia units


Anesthesia ventilators


Angiographic Catheter


Ankle replacements


Aortic valve replacement


Apnea monitors


Applicators


Argon enhanced coagulation units


Artificial facet replacement


Artificial heart


Artificial heart valve


Artificial organ


Artificial pacemaker


Artificial pancreas


Artificial urinary bladder


Aspirators


Aspirators


Atherectomy Catheter


Auditory brainstem implant


Auto transfusion units


Bags


Balloon Catheter


Bare-metal stent


Beakers


bileaflet valves


Biliary Stent


Bio implants


Bioceramic devices


Bioresorbable stents


Biphasic Cuirass Ventilation


Blood Culture devices


Blood sample cassettes


Blood Sampling Systems


Bottles


Brain implant


Breast implant


Breast pumps


Buccal sample cassettes


Buttock augmentation


Caged-ball valves


Cannulated Screws


Capillary Blood Collection devices


Capsular contracture


Cardiac Catheter


Cardiac Catheter


Cardiac defibrillator, external or internal


Cardiac Output Injectate Kits & Cables


Cardiac prostheses


Cardiac shunt


Catheters


Cell lifters


Cell scrapers


Cell spreaders


Central Venous Catheter


Centrifuge components


Cerebral shunt


CHD Stent


Chemical transfer pumps


Chin augmentation


Chin sling


Cochlear implant


Collection and Transport devices


Colonic Stent


Compression pump


Connectors


Containers


Contraceptive implants


cornea implants


Coronary stents


Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation


Cover glasses


Cranio Maxillofacial Implants


Cryo/Freezer boxes


Dehydrated Culture Media devices


Deltec Cozmo


Dental implants


Depression microscopic slides


Dewar flasks


DHS/DCS & Angled Blade Plates


Diabetes accessories


Diaphragm pumps


Diaphragmatic pacemaker


Direct Testing and Serology devices


Disposable Domes and Kits


Double Channel Catheter


Double-Lumen Catheter


Drug-Eluting Stents


Duodenal Stent


Dynamic compression plate


Dynamic hip screw


Elastomeric pump


Elbow replacements


Elbowed Catheter


Electrocardiograph (ECG)


Electrode Catheter


Electroencephalograph (EEG)


Electronic thermometer


Electrosurgical units


Endoscopes


Enteral feeding pumps


Environmental Systems devices


Esophageal stent


External Fixators


External pacemaker


Female Catheter


Fetal monitors


Films


Flat microscopic slides


Flow-restricted, oxygen-powered ventilation device


Fluid Administration Products


Fluid-Filled Catheter


Foley Catheter


Forceps


Glaucoma valve


Goggles


Gouley Catheter


grafts


Grommets


Gruentzig Balloon Catheter


Harrington rod


Heart valves


Heart-lung machine


HeartMate left ventricular assist device


Hip Prosthesis


Hip replacements


Hip resurfacing


Holders


Human-implantable RFID chips


Hypoxicator


Identification and Susceptibility devices


Implanon


Implant (medicine)


Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator


Implantable defibrilators


Implantable Devices


Implantable Gastric Stimulation


Incubators


Incubators


In-Dwelling Catheter


Infusion Sets


Inhaler


Insulin pen


Insulin pump


Insulin pumps


Interlocking Nail


Internal fixation


Intra-aortic balloon pump


Intramedullary rod


Intrathecal pump


Intrathecal pump


Intravenous Catheter


Invasive blood pressure units


Iron lung


IV Adapters


IV Catheters


IV Connectors


IV Flush Syringes


IV Products


IV Site Maintenance devices


IV Stopcocks


Joint replacement of the hand


Joint replacements


Keratometer


Kirschner wire


Knee cartilage replacement therapy


Knee replacements


Lancets


Laparoscopic insufflators


Large Fragment Implants


Lensometer


Liquid ventilator


Lytic bacteriophages


Medical grafting


Medical Pumps


Medical ventilator


Microbiology Equipment and Supplies


Microbiology Testing devices


Microchip implant (human)


Microscopic Slides


Microtiter plates


Midline Catheter


Mini dental implants


Mini Fragment Implants


Minimplants


Molecular Diagnostics devices


Mycobacteria Testing devices


Nails, Wires & Pins


Needleless IV Connectors


Nelaton urinary catheter


Norplant implantable birth control device


O'Neil Aspirating and Irrigating Needle


O'Neil Balloon Infuser


O'Neil Intermittent urinary catheter


Orthopedic implants


Osseointegration implant


Oxinium replacement joint material


Pacemakers


Pacing Catheter


Pain management pumps


Palatal obturator


Pancreatic Stent


Penile prosthesis


Penis enlargement device


Peripheral stents


Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)


Peristaltic pumps


Peritoneovenous shunt


Petri dishes


Phonocardiographs


Phototherapy units


Pipettes


Polyaxial screw


Port (medical)


Portacaval shunt


Positive airway pressure device


Prepared Media devices


Pressure Accessories and Cables


Pressure Transducers


Prostatic Catheter


Prostatic stents


Pulmonary Artery Catheters


Pulse oximeters


radiant warmers


Radiation-therapy machines


Razor Blades


re-constructive prosthesis


Right-to-left shunt


Sacral nerve stimulator


Safety Supplies


Sample collection containers


Sample collection tubes


Sample Collection/Storage Devices


Self-expandable metallic stent


Self-Retaining Catheter


Shaker flasks


Shoulder replacements


Shunt (medical)


skin implants


Small Fragment Implants


Snare Catheter


Sphygmomanometers


Spinal Cord Stimulator


Spine Surgery


Stains and Reagents


Static Control Supplies


Stent grafts


Stents


Sterility Supplies


Sterilizers


Stirrers


Subdermal implant


Surgical drill and saws


Surgical microscope


sutures


Swabs


Swan-Ganz Catheter


Syringe driver


Temperature monitor


Tenckhoff Catheter


Tiemann Catheter


tilting-disk valves


Tissue grinders


Toposcopic Catheter


Transdermal implant


Tubing


Tubing links


Two-Way Catheter


Ultrasonic nebulizers


Ultrasound sensors


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty


Ureteral Catheter


Ureteral stents


Urethral Catheter


Urinary Catheter


Urine sample cassettes


Vascular ring connector


Vascular stents


Ventilator


Ventricular assist device


Vertebral fixation


Winged Catheter


X-ray diagnostic equipment


A “hydrophobic layer” in the context of the present invention means that the coating lowers the wetting tension of a contact surface coated with the coating, compared to the corresponding uncoated contact surface. Hydrophobicity is thus a function of both the uncoated substrate and the coating. The same applies with appropriate alterations for other contexts wherein the term “hydrophobic” is used. The term “hydrophilic” means the opposite, i.e. that the wetting tension is increased compared to reference sample. The present hydrophobic layers are primarily defined by their hydrophobicity and the process conditions providing hydrophobicity, and optionally can have a composition according to the empirical composition or sum formula SiwOxCyHz, for example where w is 1, x is from about 0.5 to about 2.4, y is from about 0.6 to about 3, and z is from about 2 to about 9, optionally where w is 1, x is from about 0.5 to 1, y is from about 2 to about 3, and z is from 6 to about 9. These values of w, x, y, and z are applicable to the empirical composition SiwOxCyHz throughout this specification. The values of w, x, y, and z used throughout this specification should be understood as ratios or an empirical formula (e.g. for a coating), rather than as a limit on the number or type of atoms in a molecule. For example, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, which has the molecular composition Si4O4C8H24, can be described by the following empirical formula, arrived at by dividing each of w, x, y, and z in the molecular formula by 4, the largest common factor: Si1O1C2H6. The values of w, x, y, and z are also not limited to integers. For example, (acyclic) octamethyltrisiloxane, molecular composition Si3O2C8H24, is reducible to Si1O0.67C2.67H8.


“Wetting tension” is a specific measure for the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of a contact surface. An optional wetting tension measurement method in the context of the present invention is ASTM D 2578 or a modification of the method described in ASTM D 2578. This method uses standard wetting tension solutions (called dyne solutions) to determine the solution that comes nearest to wetting a plastic film contact surface for exactly two seconds. This is the film's wetting tension. The procedure utilized is varied herein from ASTM D 2578 in that the substrates are not flat plastic films, but are tubes made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube and (except for controls) coated according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with Hydrophobic Layer (see Example 8).


A “lubricity layer” according to the present invention is a coating which has a lower frictional resistance than the uncoated contact surface. In other words, it reduces the frictional resistance of the coated contact surface in comparison to a reference contact surface which is uncoated. The present lubricity layers are primarily defined by their lower frictional resistance than the uncoated contact surface and the process conditions providing lower frictional resistance than the uncoated contact surface, and optionally can have a composition according to the empirical composition SiwOxCyHz, as defined in this Definition Section. “Frictional resistance” can be static frictional resistance and/or kinetic frictional resistance. One of the optional embodiments of the present invention is a syringe part, e.g. a syringe barrel or plunger, coated with a lubricity layer. In this contemplated embodiment, the relevant static frictional resistance in the context of the present invention is the breakout force as defined herein, and the relevant kinetic frictional resistance in the context of the present invention is the plunger sliding force as defined herein. For example, the plunger sliding force as defined and determined herein is suitable to determine the presence or absence and the lubricity characteristics of a lubricity layer in the context of the present invention whenever the coating is applied to any syringe or syringe part, for example to the inner wall of a syringe barrel. The breakout force is of particular relevance for evaluation of the coating effect on a prefilled syringe, i.e. a syringe which is filled after coating and can be stored for some time, e.g. several months or even years, before the plunger is moved again (has to be “broken out”).


The “plunger sliding force” in the context of the present invention is the force required to maintain movement of a plunger in a syringe barrel, e.g. during aspiration or dispense. It can advantageously be determined using the ISO 7886-1:1993 test described herein and known in the art. A synonym for “plunger sliding force” often used in the art is “plunger force” or “pushing force”.


The “breakout force” in the context of the present invention is the initial force required to move the plunger in a syringe, for example in a prefilled syringe.


Both “plunger sliding force” and “breakout force” and methods for their measurement are described in more detail in subsequent parts of this description.


“Slidably” means that the plunger is permitted to slide in a syringe barrel.


In the context of this invention, “substantially rigid” means that the assembled components (ports, duct, and housing, explained further below) can be moved as a unit by handling the housing, without significant displacement of any of the assembled components respecting the others. Specifically, none of the components are connected by hoses or the like that allow substantial relative movement among the parts in normal use. The provision of a substantially rigid relation of these parts allows the location of the vessel seated on the vessel holder to be nearly as well known and precise as the locations of these parts secured to the housing


In the following, the apparatus for performing the present invention will be described first, followed by the coating methods, coatings and coated vessels, and the uses according to the present invention.


Various aspects of:


vessel processing systems and equipment;


methods for transporting vessels—processing vessels seated on vessel holders;


PECVD apparatus for making vessels;


PECVD methods for making vessels; and


vessel inspection


are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188 incorporated by reference above.


VII. PECVD Treated Vessels


VII. Vessels are contemplated having a barrier coating 90 (shown in FIG. 1, for example), which can be an SiOx coating applied to a thickness of at least 2 nm, or at least 4 nm, or at least 7 nm, or at least 10 nm, or at least 20 nm, or at least 30 nm, or at least 40 nm, or at least 50 nm, or at least 100 nm, or at least 150 nm, or at least 200 nm, or at least 300 nm, or at least 400 nm, or at least 500 nm, or at least 600 nm, or at least 700 nm, or at least 800 nm, or at least 900 nm. The coating can be up to 1000 nm, or at most 900 nm, or at most 800 nm, or at most 700 nm, or at most 600 nm, or at most 500 nm, or at most 400 nm, or at most 300 nm, or at most 200 nm, or at most 100 nm, or at most 90 nm, or at most 80 nm, or at most 70 nm, or at most 60 nm, or at most 50 nm, or at most 40 nm, or at most 30 nm, or at most 20 nm, or at most 10 nm, or at most 5 nm thick. Specific thickness ranges composed of any one of the minimum thicknesses expressed above, plus any equal or greater one of the maximum thicknesses expressed above, are expressly contemplated. The thickness of the SiOx or other coating can be measured, for example, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and its composition can be measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).


VII. It is contemplated that the choice of the material to be barred from permeating the coating and the nature of the SiOx coating applied can affect its barrier efficacy. For example, two examples of material commonly intended to be barred are oxygen and water/water vapor. Materials commonly are a better barrier to one than to the other. This is believed to be so at least in part because oxygen is transmitted through the coating by a different mechanism than water is transmitted.


VII. Oxygen transmission is affected by the physical features of the coating, such as its thickness, the presence of cracks, and other physical details of the coating. Water transmission, on the other hand, is believed to commonly be affected by chemical factors, i.e. the material of which the coating is made, more than physical factors. The inventors also believe that at least one of these chemical factors is a substantial concentration of OH moieties in the coating, which leads to a higher transmission rate of water through the barrier. An SiOx coating often contains OH moieties, and thus a physically sound coating containing a high proportion of OH moieties is a better barrier to oxygen than to water. A physically sound carbon-based barrier, such as amorphous carbon or diamond-like carbon (DLC) commonly is a better barrier to water than is a SiOx coating because the carbon-based barrier more commonly has a lower concentration of OH moieties.


VII. Other factors lead to a preference for an SiOx coating, however, such as its oxygen barrier efficacy and its close chemical resemblance to glass and quartz. Glass and quartz (when used as the base material of a vessel) are two materials long known to present a very high barrier to oxygen and water transmission as well as substantial inertness to many materials commonly carried in vessels. Thus, it is commonly desirable to optimize the water barrier properties such as the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of an SiOx coating, rather than choosing a different or additional type of coating to serve as a water transmission barrier.


VII. Several ways contemplated to improve the WVTR of an SiOx coating are as follow.


VII. The concentration ratio of organic moieties (carbon and hydrogen compounds) to OH moieties in the deposited coating can be increased. This can be done, for example, by increasing the proportion of oxygen in the feed gases (as by increasing the oxygen feed rate or by lowering the feed rate of one or more other constituents). The lowered incidence of OH moieties is believed to result from increasing the degree of reaction of the oxygen feed with the hydrogen in the silicone source to yield more volatile water in the PECVD exhaust and a lower concentration of OH moieties trapped or incorporated in the coating.


VII. Higher energy can be applied in the PECVD process, either by raising the plasma generation power level, by applying the power for a longer period, or both. An increase in the applied energy must be employed with care when used to coat a plastic tube or other device, as it also has a tendency to distort the vessel being treated, to the extent the tube absorbs the plasma generation power. This is why RF power is contemplated in the context of present application. Distortion of the medical devices can be reduced or eliminated by employing the energy in a series of two or more pulses separated by cooling time, by cooling the vessels while applying energy, by applying the coating in a shorter time (commonly thus making it thinner), by selecting a frequency of the applied coating that is absorbed minimally by the base material selected for being coated, and/or by applying more than one coating, with time in between the respective energy application steps. For example, high power pulsing can be used with a duty cycle of 1 millisecond on, 99 milliseconds off, while continuing to feed the process gas. The process gas is then the coolant, as it keeps flowing between pulses. Another alternative is to reconfigure the power applicator, as by adding magnets to confine the plasma increase the effective power application (the power that actually results in incremental coating, as opposed to waste power that results in heating or unwanted coating). This expedient results in the application of more coating-formation energy per total Watt-hour of energy applied. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,904,952.


VII. An oxygen post-treatment of the coating can be applied to remove OH moieties from the previously-deposited coating. This treatment is also contemplated to remove residual volatile organosilicon compounds or silicones or oxidize the coating to form additional SiOx.


VII. The plastic base material tube can be preheated.


VII. A different volatile source of silicon, such as hexamethyldisilazane (HMDZ), can be used as part or all of the silicone feed. It is contemplated that changing the feed gas to HMDZ will address the problem because this compound has no oxygen moieties in it, as supplied. It is contemplated that one source of OH moieties in the HMDSO-sourced coating is hydrogenation of at least some of the oxygen atoms present in unreacted HMDSO.


VII. A composite coating can be used, such as a carbon-based coating combined with SiOx. This can be done, for example, by changing the reaction conditions or by adding a substituted or unsubstituted hydrocarbon, such as an alkane, alkene, or alkyne, to the feed gas as well as an organosilicon-based compound. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,904,952, which states in relevant part: “For example, inclusion of a lower hydrocarbon such as propylene provides carbon moieties and improves most properties of the deposited films (except for light transmission), and bonding analysis indicates the film to be silicon dioxide in nature. Use of methane, methanol, or acetylene, however, produces films that are silicone in nature. The inclusion of a minor amount of gaseous nitrogen to the gas stream provides nitrogen moieties in the deposited films and increases the deposition rate, improves the transmission and reflection optical properties on glass, and varies the index of refraction in response to varied amounts of N2. The addition of nitrous oxide to the gas stream increases the deposition rate and improves the optical properties, but tends to decrease the film hardness.”


VII. A diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating can be formed as the primary or sole coating deposited. This can be done, for example, by changing the reaction conditions or by feeding methane, hydrogen, and helium to a PECVD process. These reaction feeds have no oxygen, so no OH moieties can be formed. For one example, an SiOx coating can be applied on the interior of a tube or syringe barrel and an outer DLC coating can be applied on the exterior contact surface of a tube or syringe barrel. Or, the SiOx and DLC coatings can both be applied as a single layer or plural layers of an interior tube or syringe barrel coating.


VII. Referring to FIG. 1, the barrier or other type of coating 90 reduces the transmission of atmospheric gases into the vessel 80 through its interior contact surface 88. Or, the barrier or other type of coating 90 reduces the contact of the contents of the vessel 80 with the interior contact surface 88. The barrier or other type of coating can comprise, for example, SiOx, amorphous (for example, diamond-like) carbon, or a combination of these.


VII. Any coating described herein can be used for coating a contact surface, for example a plastic contact surface. It can further be used as a barrier layer, for example as a barrier against a gas or liquid, optionally against water vapor, oxygen and/or air. It can also be used for preventing or reducing mechanical and/or chemical effects which the coated contact surface would have on a compound or composition if the contact surface were uncoated. For example, it can prevent or reduce the precipitation of a compound or composition, for example insulin precipitation or blood clotting or platelet activation.


VII.A. Evacuated Blood Collection Vessels


VII.A.1. Tubes


VII.A.I. Referring to FIG. 1, more details of the vessel such as 80 are shown. The illustrated vessel 80 can be generally tubular, having an opening 82 at one end of the vessel, opposed by a closed end 84. The vessel 80 also has a wall 86 defining an interior contact surface 88. One example of the vessel 80 is a medical sample tube, such as an evacuated blood collection tube, as commonly is used by a phlebotomist for receiving a venipuncture sample of a patient's blood for use in a medical laboratory.


VII.A.1. The vessel 80 can be made, for example, of thermoplastic material. Some examples of suitable thermoplastic material are polyethylene terephthalate or a polyolefin such as polypropylene or a cyclic polyolefin copolymer.


VII.A.1. The vessel 80 can be made by any suitable method, such as by injection molding, by blow molding, by machining, by fabrication from tubing stock, or by other suitable means. PECVD can be used to form a coating on the internal contact surface of SiOx.


VII.A.1. If intended for use as an evacuated blood collection tube, the vessel 80 desirably can be strong enough to withstand a substantially total internal vacuum substantially without deformation when exposed to an external pressure of 760 Torr or atmospheric pressure and other coating processing conditions. This property can be provided, in a thermoplastic vessel 80, by providing a vessel 80 made of suitable materials having suitable dimensions and a glass transition temperature higher than the processing temperature of the coating process, for example a cylindrical wall 86 having sufficient wall thickness for its diameter and material.


VII.A.1. Medical vessels or containers like sample collection tubes and syringes are relatively small and are injection molded with relatively thick walls, which renders them able to be evacuated without being crushed by the ambient atmospheric pressure. They are thus stronger than carbonated soft drink bottles or other larger or thinner-walled plastic containers. Since sample collection tubes designed for use as evacuated vessels typically are constructed to withstand a full vacuum during storage, they can be used as vacuum chambers.


VII.A.1. Such adaptation of the vessels to be their own vacuum chambers might eliminate the need to place the vessels into a vacuum chamber for PECVD treatment, which typically is carried out at very low pressure. The use of a vessel as its own vacuum chamber can result in faster processing time (since loading and unloading of the parts from a separate vacuum chamber is not necessary) and can lead to simplified equipment configurations. Furthermore, a vessel holder is contemplated, for certain embodiments, that will hold the device (for alignment to gas tubes and other apparatus), seal the device (so that the vacuum can be created by attaching the vessel holder to a vacuum pump) and move the device between molding and subsequent processing steps.


VII.A.1. A vessel 80 used as an evacuated blood collection tube should be able to withstand external atmospheric pressure, while internally evacuated to a reduced pressure useful for the intended application, without a substantial volume of air or other atmospheric gas leaking into the tube (as by bypassing the closure) or permeating through the wall 86 during its shelf life. If the as-molded vessel 80 cannot meet this requirement, it can be processed by coating the interior contact surface 88 with a barrier or other type of coating 90. It is desirable to treat and/or coat the interior contact surfaces of these devices (such as sample collection tubes and syringe barrels) to impart various properties that will offer advantages over existing polymeric devices and/or to mimic existing glass products. It is also desirable to measure various properties of the devices before and/or after treatment or coating.


VII.A.1.a. Coating Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor Made by In Situ Polymerizing Organosilicon Precursor


VII.A.1.a. A process is contemplated for applying a lubricity layer characterized as defined in the Definition Section on a substrate, for example the interior of the barrel of a syringe, comprising applying one of the described precursors on or in the vicinity of a substrate at a thickness of 1 to 5000 nm, optionally 10 to 1000 nm, optionally 10-200 nm, optionally 20 to 100 nm thick and crosslinking or polymerizing (or both) the coating, optionally in a PECVD process, to provide a lubricated contact surface. The coating applied by this process is also contemplated to be new.


VII.A.1.a. A coating of SiwOxCyHz as defined in the Definition Section can have utility as a hydrophobic layer. Coatings of this kind are contemplated to be hydrophobic, independent of whether they function as lubricity layers. A coating or treatment is defined as “hydrophobic” if it lowers the wetting tension of a contact surface, compared to the corresponding uncoated or untreated contact surface. Hydrophobicity is thus a function of both the untreated substrate and the treatment.


VII.A.1.a. The degree of hydrophobicity of a coating can be varied by varying its composition, properties, or deposition method. For example, a coating of SiOx having little or no hydrocarbon content is more hydrophilic than a coating of SiwOxCyHz as defined in the Definition Section. Generally speaking, the higher the C—Hx (e.g. CH, CH2, or CH3) moiety content of the coating, either by weight, volume, or molarity, relative to its silicon content, the more hydrophobic the coating.


VII.A.1.a. A hydrophobic layer can be very thin, having a thickness of at least 4 nm, or at least 7 nm, or at least 10 nm, or at least 20 nm, or at least 30 nm, or at least 40 nm, or at least 50 nm, or at least 100 nm, or at least 150 nm, or at least 200 nm, or at least 300 nm, or at least 400 nm, or at least 500 nm, or at least 600 nm, or at least 700 nm, or at least 800 nm, or at least 900 nm. The coating can be up to 1000 nm, or at most 900 nm, or at most 800 nm, or at most 700 nm, or at most 600 nm, or at most 500 nm, or at most 400 nm, or at most 300 nm, or at most 200 nm, or at most 100 nm, or at most 90 nm, or at most 80 nm, or at most 70 nm, or at most 60 nm, or at most 50 nm, or at most 40 nm, or at most 30 nm, or at most 20 nm, or at most 10 nm, or at most 5 nm thick. Specific thickness ranges composed of any one of the minimum thicknesses expressed above, plus any equal or greater one of the maximum thicknesses expressed above, are expressly contemplated.


VII.A.1.a. One utility for such a hydrophobic layer is to isolate a thermoplastic tube wall, made for example of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), from blood collected within the tube. The hydrophobic layer can be applied on top of a hydrophilic SiOx coating on the internal contact surface of the tube. The SiOx coating increases the barrier properties of the thermoplastic tube and the hydrophobic layer changes the contact surface energy of blood contact surface with the tube wall. The hydrophobic layer can be made by providing a precursor selected from those identified in this specification. For example, the hydrophobic layer precursor can comprise hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) or octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS).


VII.A.1.a. Another use for a hydrophobic layer is to prepare a glass cell preparation tube. The tube has a wall defining a lumen, a hydrophobic layer in the internal contact surface of the glass wall, and contains a citrate reagent. The hydrophobic layer can be made by providing a precursor selected from those identified elsewhere in this specification. For another example, the hydrophobic layer precursor can comprise hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) or octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS). Another source material for hydrophobic layers is an alkyl trimethoxysilane of the formula:

R—Si(OCH3)3

in which R is a hydrogen atom or an organic substituent, for example methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, t-butyl, vinyl, alkyne, epoxide, or others. Combinations of two or more of these are also contemplated.


VII.A.1.a. Combinations of acid or base catalysis and heating, using an alkyl trimethoxysilane precursor as described above, can condense the precursor (removing ROH by-products) to form crosslinked polymers, which can optionally be further crosslinked via an alternative method. One specific example is by Shimojima et. al. J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 658-663.


VII.A.1.a. A lubricity layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, can be applied as a subsequent coating after applying an SiOx barrier coating to the interior contact surface 88 of the vessel 80 to provide a lubricity layer, particularly if the lubricity layer is a liquid organosiloxane compound at the end of the coating process.


VII.A.1.a. Optionally, after the lubricity layer is applied, it can be post-cured after the PECVD process. Radiation curing approaches, including UV-initiated (free radial or cationic), electron-beam (E-beam), and thermal as described in Development Of Novel Cycloaliphatic Siloxanes For Thermal And UV-Curable Applications (Ruby Chakraborty Dissertation, can 2008) be utilized.


VII.A.1.a. Another approach for providing a lubricity layer is to use a silicone demolding agent when injection-molding the thermoplastic vessel to be lubricated. For example, it is contemplated that any of the demolding agents and latent monomers causing in-situ thermal lubricity layer formation during the molding process can be used. Or, the aforementioned monomers can be doped into traditional demolding agents to accomplish the same result.


VII.A.1.a. A lubricity layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, is particularly contemplated for the internal contact surface of a syringe barrel as further described below. A lubricated internal contact surface of a syringe barrel can reduce the plunger sliding force needed to advance a plunger in the barrel during operation of a syringe, or the breakout force to start a plunger moving after the prefilled syringe plunger has pushed away the intervening lubricant or adhered to the barrel, for example due to decomposition of the lubricant between the plunger and the barrel. As explained elsewhere in this specification, a lubricity layer also can be applied to the interior contact surface 88 of the vessel 80 to improve adhesion of a subsequent coating of SiOx.


VII.A.1.a. Thus, the coating 90 can comprise a layer of SiOx and a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section. The lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer of SiwOxCyHz can be deposited between the layer of SiOx and the interior contact surface of the vessel. Or, the layer of SiOx can be deposited between the lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer and the interior contact surface of the vessel. Or, three or more layers, either alternating or graduated between these two coating compositions: (1) a layer of SiOx and (2) the lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer; can also be used. The layer of SiOx can be deposited adjacent to the lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer or remotely, with at least one intervening layer of another material. The layer of SiOx can be deposited adjacent to the interior contact surface of the vessel. Or, the lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer can be deposited adjacent to the interior contact surface of the vessel.


VII.A.1.a. Another expedient contemplated here, for adjacent layers of SiOx and a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer, is a graded composite of SiwOxCyHz, as defined in the Definition Section. A graded composite can be separate layers of a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer and SiOx with a transition or interface of intermediate composition between them, or separate layers of a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer and SiOx with an intermediate distinct layer of intermediate composition between them, or a single layer that changes continuously or in steps from a composition of a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer to a composition more like SiOx, going through the coating in a normal direction.


VII.A.1.a. The grade in the graded composite can go in either direction. For example, the a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer can be applied directly to the substrate and graduate to a composition further from the contact surface of SiOx. Or, the composition of SiOx can be applied directly to the substrate and graduate to a composition further from the contact surface of a lubricity layer and/or hydrophobic layer. A graduated coating is particularly contemplated if a coating of one composition is better for adhering to the substrate than the other, in which case the better-adhering composition can, for example, be applied directly to the substrate. It is contemplated that the more distant portions of the graded coating can be less compatible with the substrate than the adjacent portions of the graded coating, since at any point the coating is changing gradually in properties, so adjacent portions at nearly the same depth of the coating have nearly identical composition, and more widely physically separated portions at substantially different depths can have more diverse properties. It is also contemplated that a coating portion that forms a better barrier against transfer of material to or from the substrate can be directly against the substrate, to prevent the more remote coating portion that forms a poorer barrier from being contaminated with the material intended to be barred or impeded by the barrier.


VII.A.1.a. The coating, instead of being graded, optionally can have sharp transitions between one layer and the next, without a substantial gradient of composition. Such coatings can be made, for example, by providing the gases to produce a layer as a steady state flow in a non-plasma state, then energizing the system with a brief plasma discharge to form a coating on the substrate. If a subsequent coating is to be applied, the gases for the previous coating are cleared out and the gases for the next coating are applied in a steady-state fashion before energizing the plasma and again forming a distinct layer on the contact surface of the substrate or its outermost previous coating, with little if any gradual transition at the interface.


VII.A.1.b. Citrate Blood Tube Having Wall Coated with Hydrophobic Layer Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor


VII.A.1.b. Another embodiment is a cell preparation tube having a wall provided with a hydrophobic layer on its inside contact surface and containing an aqueous sodium citrate reagent. The hydrophobic layer can be also be applied on top of a hydrophilic SiOx coating on the internal contact surface of the tube. The SiOx coating increases the barrier properties of the thermoplastic tube and the hydrophobic layer changes the contact surface energy of blood contact surface with the tube wall.


VII.A.1.b. The wall is made of thermoplastic material having an internal contact surface defining a lumen.


VII.A.1.b. A blood collection tube according to the embodiment VII.A.1.b can have a first layer of SiOx on the internal contact surface of the tube, applied as explained in this specification, to function as an oxygen barrier and extend the shelf life of an evacuated blood collection tube made of thermoplastic material. A second layer of a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, can then be applied over the barrier layer on the internal contact surface of the tube to provide a hydrophobic contact surface. The coating is effective to reduce the platelet activation of blood plasma treated with a sodium citrate additive and exposed to the inner contact surface, compared to the same type of wall uncoated.


VII.A.1.b. PECVD is used to form a hydrophobic layer on the internal contact surface, characterized as defined in the Definition Section. Unlike conventional citrate blood collection tubes, the blood collection tube having a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section does not require a coating of baked on silicone on the vessel wall, as is conventionally applied to make the contact surface of the tube hydrophobic.


VII.A.1.b. Both layers can be applied using the same precursor, for example HMDSO or OMCTS, and different PECVD reaction conditions.


VII.A.1.b. A sodium citrate anticoagulation reagent is then placed within the tube and it is evacuated and sealed with a closure to produce an evacuated blood collection tube. The components and formulation of the reagent are known to those skilled in the art. The aqueous sodium citrate reagent is disposed in the lumen of the tube in an amount effective to inhibit coagulation of blood introduced into the tube.


VII.A.1.c. SiOx Barrier Coated Double Wall Plastic Vessel—COC, PET, SiOx Layers


VII.A.1.c. Another embodiment is a vessel having a wall at least partially enclosing a lumen. The wall has an interior polymer layer enclosed by an exterior polymer layer. One of the polymer layers is a layer at least 0.1 mm thick of a cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) resin defining a water vapor barrier. Another of the polymer layers is a layer at least 0.1 mm thick of a polyester resin.


VII.A.1.c. The wall includes an oxygen barrier layer of SiOx having a thickness of from about 10 to about 500 angstroms.


VII.A.1.c. In an embodiment, illustrated in FIG. 6, the vessel 80 can be a double-walled vessel having an inner wall 408 and an outer wall 410, respectively made of the same or different materials. One particular embodiment of this type can be made with one wall molded from a cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) and the other wall molded from a polyester such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), with an SiOx coating as previously described on the interior contact surface 412. As needed, a tie coating or layer can be inserted between the inner and outer walls to promote adhesion between them. An advantage of this wall construction is that walls having different properties can be combined to form a composite having the respective properties of each wall.


VII.A.1.c. As one example, the inner wall 408 can be made of PET coated on the interior contact surface 412 with an SiOx barrier layer, and the outer wall 410 can be made of COC. PET coated with SiOx, as shown elsewhere in this specification, is an excellent oxygen barrier, while COC is an excellent barrier for water vapor, providing a low water vapor transition rate (WVTR). This composite vessel can have superior barrier properties for both oxygen and water vapor. This construction is contemplated, for example, for an evacuated medical sample collection tube that contains an aqueous reagent as manufactured, and has a substantial shelf life, so it should have a barrier preventing transfer of water vapor outward or transfer of oxygen or other gases inward through its composite wall during its shelf life.


VII.A.1.c. As another example, the inner wall 408 can be made of COC coated on the interior contact surface 412 with an SiOx barrier layer, and the outer wall 410 can be made of PET. This construction is contemplated, for example, for a prefilled syringe that contains an aqueous sterile fluid as manufactured. The SiOx barrier will prevent oxygen from entering the syringe through its wall. The COC inner wall will prevent ingress or egress of other materials such as water, thus preventing the water in the aqueous sterile fluid from leaching materials from the wall material into the syringe. The COC inner wall is also contemplated to prevent water derived from the aqueous sterile fluid from passing out of the syringe (thus undesirably concentrating the aqueous sterile fluid), and will prevent non-sterile water or other fluids outside the syringe from entering through the syringe wall and causing the contents to become non-sterile. The COC inner wall is also contemplated to be useful for decreasing the breaking force or friction of the plunger against the inner wall of a syringe.


VII.A.1.d. Method of Making Double Wall Plastic Vessel—COC, PET, SiOx Layers


VII.A.1.d. Another embodiment is a method of making a vessel having a wall having an interior polymer layer enclosed by an exterior polymer layer, one layer made of COC and the other made of polyester. The vessel is made by a process including introducing COC and polyester resin layers into an injection mold through concentric injection nozzles.


VII.A.1.d. An optional additional step is applying an amorphous carbon coating to the vessel by PECVD, as an inside coating, an outside coating, or as an interlayer coating located between the layers.


VII.A.1.d. An optional additional step is applying an SiOx barrier layer to the inside of the vessel wall, where SiOx is defined as before. Another optional additional step is post-treating the SiOx layer with a process gas consisting essentially of oxygen and essentially free of a volatile silicon compound.


VII.A.1.d. Optionally, the SiOx coating can be formed at least partially from a silazane feed gas.


VII.A.1.d. The vessel 80 shown in FIG. 6 can be made from the inside out, for one example, by injection molding the inner wall in a first mold cavity, then removing the core and molded inner wall from the first mold cavity to a second, larger mold cavity, then injection molding the outer wall against the inner wall in the second mold cavity. Optionally, a tie layer can be provided to the exterior contact surface of the molded inner wall before over-molding the outer wall onto the tie layer.


VII.A.1.d. Or, the vessel 80 shown in FIG. 6 can be made from the outside in, for one example, by inserting a first core in the mold cavity, injection molding the outer wall in the mold cavity, then removing the first core from the molded first wall and inserting a second, smaller core, then injection molding the inner wall against the outer wall still residing in the mold cavity. Optionally, a tie layer can be provided to the interior contact surface of the molded outer wall before over-molding the inner wall onto the tie layer.


VII.A.1.d. Or, the vessel 80 shown in FIG. 6 can be made in a two shot mold. This can be done, for one example, by injection molding material for the inner wall from an inner nozzle and the material for the outer wall from a concentric outer nozzle. Optionally, a tie layer can be provided from a third, concentric nozzle disposed between the inner and outer nozzles. The nozzles can feed the respective wall materials simultaneously. One useful expedient is to begin feeding the outer wall material through the outer nozzle slightly before feeding the inner wall material through the inner nozzle. If there is an intermediate concentric nozzle, the order of flow can begin with the outer nozzle and continue in sequence from the intermediate nozzle and then from the inner nozzle. Or, the order of beginning feeding can start from the inside nozzle and work outward, in reverse order compared to the preceding description.


VII.A.1.e. Barrier Coating Made of Glass


VII.A.1.e. Another embodiment is a vessel including a barrier coating and a closure. The vessel is generally tubular and made of thermoplastic material. The vessel has a mouth and a lumen bounded at least in part by a wall having an inner contact surface interfacing with the lumen. There is an at least essentially continuous barrier coating made of glass on the inner contact surface of the wall. A closure covers the mouth and isolates the lumen of the vessel from ambient air.


VII.A.1.e. The vessel 80 can also be made, for example of glass of any type used in medical or laboratory applications, such as soda-lime glass, borosilicate glass, or other glass formulations. Other vessels having any shape or size, made of any material, are also contemplated for use in the system 20. One function of coating a glass vessel can be to reduce the ingress of ions in the glass, either intentionally or as impurities, for example sodium, calcium, or others, from the glass to the contents of the vessel, such as a reagent or blood in an evacuated blood collection tube. Another function of coating a glass vessel in whole or in part, such as selectively at contact surfaces contacted in sliding relation to other parts, is to provide lubricity to the coating, for example to ease the insertion or removal of a stopper or passage of a sliding element such as a piston in a syringe. Still another reason to coat a glass vessel is to prevent a reagent or intended sample for the vessel, such as blood, from sticking to the wall of the vessel or an increase in the rate of coagulation of the blood in contact with the wall of the vessel.


VII.A.1.e.i. A related embodiment is a vessel as described in the previous paragraph, in which the barrier coating is made of soda lime glass, borosilicate glass, or another type of glass.


VII.A.2. Stoppers


VII.A.2. FIGS. 3-5 illustrate a vessel 268, which can be an evacuated blood collection tube, having a closure 270 to isolate the lumen 274 from the ambient environment. The closure 270 comprises a interior-facing contact surface 272 exposed to the lumen 274 of the vessel 268 and a wall-contacting contact surface 276 that is in contact with the inner contact surface 278 of the vessel wall 280. In the illustrated embodiment the closure 270 is an assembly of a stopper 282 and a shield 284.


VII.A.2.a. Method of Applying Lubricity Layer to Stopper in Vacuum Chamber


VII.A.2.a. Another embodiment is a method of applying a coating on an elastomeric stopper such as 282. The stopper 282, separate from the vessel 268, is placed in a substantially evacuated chamber. A reaction mixture is provided including plasma forming gas, i.e. an organosilicon compound gas, optionally an oxidizing gas, and optionally a hydrocarbon gas. Plasma is formed in the reaction mixture, which is contacted with the stopper. A lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, is deposited on at least a portion of the stopper.


VII.A.2.a. In the illustrated embodiment, the wall-contacting contact surface 276 of the closure 270 is coated with a lubricity layer 286.


VII.A.2.a. In some embodiments, the lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, is effective to reduce the transmission of one or more constituents of the stopper, such as a metal ion constituent of the stopper, or of the vessel wall, into the vessel lumen. Certain elastomeric compositions of the type useful for fabricating a stopper 282 contain trace amounts of one or more metal ions. These ions sometimes should not be able to migrate into the lumen 274 or come in substantial quantities into contact with the vessel contents, particularly if the sample vessel 268 is to be used to collect a sample for trace metal analysis. It is contemplated for example that coatings containing relatively little organic content, i.e. where y and z of SiwOxCyHz as defined in the Definition Section are low or zero, are particularly useful as a metal ion barrier in this application. Regarding silica as a metal ion barrier see, for example, Anupama Mallikarjunan, Jasbir Juneja, Guangrong Yang, Shyam P. Murarka, and Toh-Ming Lu, The Effect of Interfacial Chemistry on Metal Ion Penetration into Polymeric Films, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 734, pp. B9.60.1 to B9.60.6 (Materials Research Society, 2003); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,578,103 and 6,200,658, and European Appl. EP0697378 A2, which are all incorporated here by reference. It is contemplated, however, that some organic content can be useful to provide a more elastic coating and to adhere the coating to the elastomeric contact surface of the stopper 282.


VII.A.2.a. In some embodiments, the lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, can be a composite of material having first and second layers, in which the first or inner layer 288 interfaces with the elastomeric stopper 282 and is effective to reduce the transmission of one or more constituents of the stopper 282 into the vessel lumen. The second layer 286 can interface with the inner wall 280 of the vessel and is effective as a lubricity layer to reduce friction between the stopper 282 and the inner wall 280 of the vessel when the stopper 282 is seated on or in the vessel 268. Such composites are described in connection with syringe coatings elsewhere in this specification.


VII.A.2.a. Or, the first and second layers 288 and 286 are defined by a coating of graduated properties, in which the values of y and z defined in the Definition Section are greater in the first layer than in the second layer.


VII.A.2.a. The lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer can be applied, for example, by PECVD substantially as previously described. The lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer can be, for example, between 0.5 and 5000 nm (5 to 50,000 Angstroms) thick, or between 1 and 5000 nm thick, or between 5 and 5000 nm thick, or between 10 and 5000 nm thick, or between 20 and 5000 nm thick, or between 50 and 5000 nm thick, or between 100 and 5000 nm thick, or between 200 and 5000 nm thick, or between 500 and 5000 nm thick, or between 1000 and 5000 nm thick, or between 2000 and 5000 nm thick, or between 3000 and 5000 nm thick, or between 4000 and 10,000 nm thick.


VII.A.2.a. Certain advantages are contemplated for plasma coated lubricity layers, versus the much thicker (one micron or greater) conventional spray applied silicone lubricants. Plasma coatings have a much lower migratory potential to move into blood versus sprayed or micron-coated silicones, both because the amount of plasma coated material is much less and because it can be more intimately applied to the coated contact surface and better bonded in place.


VII.A.2.a. Nanocoatings, as applied by PECVD, are contemplated to offer lower resistance to sliding of an adjacent contact surface or flow of an adjacent fluid than micron coatings, as the plasma coating tends to provide a smoother contact surface.


VII.A.2.a. Still another embodiment is a method of applying a coating of a lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer on an elastomeric stopper. The stopper can be used, for example, to close the vessel previously described. The method includes several parts. A stopper is placed in a substantially evacuated chamber. A reaction mixture is provided comprising plasma forming gas, i.e. an organosilicon compound gas, optionally an oxidizing gas, and optionally a hydrocarbon gas. Plasma is formed in the reaction mixture. The stopper is contacted with the reaction mixture, depositing the coating of a lubricity and/or hydrophobic layer on at least a portion of the stopper.


VII.A.2.a. In practicing this method, to obtain higher values of y and z as defined in the Definition Section, it is contemplated that the reaction mixture can comprise a hydrocarbon gas, as further described above and below. Optionally, the reaction mixture can contain oxygen, if lower values of y and z or higher values of x are contemplated. Or, particularly to reduce oxidation and increase the values of y and z, the reaction mixture can be essentially free of an oxidizing gas.


VII.A.2.a. In practicing this method to coat certain embodiments of the stopper such as the stopper 282, it is contemplated to be unnecessary to project the reaction mixture into the concavities of the stopper. For example, the wall-contacting and interior facing contact surfaces 276 and 272 of the stopper 282 are essentially convex, and thus readily treated by a batch process in which a multiplicity of stoppers such as 282 can be located and treated in a single substantially evacuated reaction chamber. It is further contemplated that in some embodiments the coatings 286 and 288 do not need to present as formidable a barrier to oxygen or water as the barrier coating on the interior contact surface 280 of the vessel 268, as the material of the stopper 282 can serve this function to a large degree.


VII.A.2.a. Many variations of the stopper and the stopper coating process are contemplated. The stopper 282 can be contacted with the plasma. Or, the plasma can be formed upstream of the stopper 282, producing plasma product, and the plasma product can be contacted with the stopper 282. The plasma can be formed by exciting the reaction mixture with electromagnetic energy and/or microwave energy.


VII.A.2.a. Variations of the reaction mixture are contemplated. The plasma forming gas can include an inert gas. The inert gas can be, for example, argon or helium, or other gases described in this disclosure. The organosilicon compound gas can be, or include, HMDSO, OMCTS, any of the other organosilicon compounds mentioned in this disclosure, or a combination of two or more of these. The oxidizing gas can be oxygen or the other gases mentioned in this disclosure, or a combination of two or more of these. The hydrocarbon gas can be, for example, methane, methanol, ethane, ethylene, ethanol, propane, propylene, propanol, acetylene, or a combination of two or more of these.


VII.A.2.b. Applying by PECVD a Coating of Group III or IV Element and Carbon on a Stopper


VII.A.2.b. Another embodiment is a method of applying a coating of a composition including carbon and one or more elements of Groups III or IV on an elastomeric stopper. To carry out the method, a stopper is located in a deposition chamber.


VII.A.2.b. A reaction mixture is provided in the deposition chamber, including a plasma forming gas with a gaseous source of a Group III element, a Group IV element, or a combination of two or more of these. The reaction mixture optionally contains an oxidizing gas and optionally contains a gaseous compound having one or more C—H bonds. Plasma is formed in the reaction mixture, and the stopper is contacted with the reaction mixture. A coating of a Group III element or compound, a Group IV element or compound, or a combination of two or more of these is deposited on at least a portion of the stopper.


VII.A.3. Stoppered Plastic Vessel Having Barrier Coating Effective to Provide 95% Vacuum Retention for 24 Months


VII.A.3. Another embodiment is a vessel including a vessel, a barrier coating, and a closure. The vessel is generally tubular and made of thermoplastic material. The vessel has a mouth and a lumen bounded at least in part by a wall. The wall has an inner contact surface interfacing with the lumen. An at least essentially continuous barrier coating is applied on the inner contact surface of the wall. The barrier coating is effective to provide a substantial shelf life. A closure is provided covering the mouth of the vessel and isolating the lumen of the vessel from ambient air.


VII.A.3. Referring to FIGS. 3-5, a vessel 268 such as an evacuated blood collection tube or other vessel is shown.


VII.A.3. The vessel is, in this embodiment, a generally tubular vessel having an at least essentially continuous barrier coating and a closure. The vessel is made of thermoplastic material having a mouth and a lumen bounded at least in part by a wall having an inner contact surface interfacing with the lumen. The barrier coating is deposited on the inner contact surface of the wall, and is effective to maintain at least 95%, or at least 90%, of the initial vacuum level of the vessel for a shelf life of at least 24 months, optionally at least 30 months, optionally at least 36 months. The closure covers the mouth of the vessel and isolates the lumen of the vessel from ambient air.


VII.A.3. The closure, for example the closure 270 illustrated in the Figures or another type of closure, is provided to maintain a partial vacuum and/or to contain a sample and limit or prevent its exposure to oxygen or contaminants. FIGS. 3-5 are based on figures found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,602,206, but the present discovery is not limited to that or any other particular type of closure.


VII.A.3. The closure 270 comprises a interior-facing contact surface 272 exposed to the lumen 274 of the vessel 268 and a wall-contacting contact surface 276 that is in contact with the inner contact surface 278 of the vessel wall 280. In the illustrated embodiment the closure 270 is an assembly of a stopper 282 and a shield 284.


VII.A.3. In the illustrated embodiment, the stopper 282 defines the wall-contacting contact surface 276 and the inner contact surface 278, while the shield is largely or entirely outside the stoppered vessel 268, retains and provides a grip for the stopper 282, and shields a person removing the closure 270 from being exposed to any contents expelled from the vessel 268, such as due to a pressure difference inside and outside of the vessel 268 when the vessel 268 is opened and air rushes in or out to equalize the pressure difference.


VII.A.3. It is further contemplated that the coatings on the vessel wall 280 and the wall contacting contact surface 276 of the stopper can be coordinated. The stopper can be coated with a lubricity silicone layer, and the vessel wall 280, made for example of PET or glass, can be coated with a harder SiOx layer, or with an underlying SiOx layer and a lubricity overcoat.


VII.B. Syringes


VII.B. The foregoing description has largely addressed applying a barrier coating to a tube with one permanently closed end, such as a blood collection tube or, more generally, a specimen receiving tube 80. The apparatus is not limited to such a device.


VII.B. Another example of a suitable vessel, shown in FIG. 2, is a syringe barrel 250 for a medical syringe 252. Such syringes 252 are sometimes supplied prefilled with saline solution, a pharmaceutical preparation, or the like for use in medical techniques. Pre-filled syringes 252 are also contemplated to benefit from an SiOx barrier or other type of coating on the interior contact surface 254 to keep the contents of the prefilled syringe 252 out of contact with the plastic of the syringe, for example of the syringe barrel 250 during storage. The barrier or other type of coating can be used to avoid leaching components of the plastic into the contents of the barrel through the interior contact surface 254.


VII.B. A syringe barrel 250 as molded commonly can be open at both the back end 256, to receive a plunger 258, and at the front end 260, to receive a hypodermic needle, a nozzle, or tubing for dispensing the contents of the syringe 252 or for receiving material into the syringe 252. But the front end 260 can optionally be capped and the plunger 258 optionally can be fitted in place before the prefilled syringe 252 is used, closing the barrel 250 at both ends. A cap 262 can be installed either for the purpose of processing the syringe barrel 250 or assembled syringe, or to remain in place during storage of the prefilled syringe 252, up to the time the cap 262 is removed and (optionally) a hypodermic needle or other delivery conduit is fitted on the front end 260 to prepare the syringe 252 for use.


VII.B.1.a. Syringe Having Barrel Coated with Lubricity Layer Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor


VII.B.1.a. Still another embodiment is a vessel having a lubricity layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, of the type made by the following process.


VII.B.1.a. A precursor is provided as defined above.


VII.B.1.a. The precursor is applied to a substrate under conditions effective to form a coating. The coating is polymerized or crosslinked, or both, to form a lubricated contact surface having a lower plunger sliding force or breakout force than the untreated substrate.


VII.B.1.a. Respecting any of the Embodiments VII and sub-parts, optionally the applying step is carried out by vaporizing the precursor and providing it in the vicinity of the substrate.


VII.B.1.a. Respecting any of the Embodiments VII.A.1.a.i, optionally a plasma, optionally a non-hollow-cathode plasma, is formed in the vicinity of the substrate. Optionally, the precursor is provided in the substantial absence of oxygen. Optionally, the precursor is provided in the substantial absence of a carrier gas. Optionally, the precursor is provided in the substantial absence of nitrogen. Optionally, the precursor is provided at less than 1 Torr absolute pressure. Optionally, the precursor is provided to the vicinity of a plasma emission. Optionally, the precursor its reaction product is applied to the substrate at a thickness of 1 to 5000 nm thick, or 10 to 1000 nm thick, or 10-200 nm thick, or 20 to 100 nm thick. Optionally, the substrate comprises glass. Optionally, the substrate comprises a polymer, optionally a polycarbonate polymer, optionally an olefin polymer, optionally a cyclic olefin copolymer, optionally a polypropylene polymer, optionally a polyester polymer, optionally a polyethylene terephthalate polymer.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the plasma is generated by energizing the gaseous reactant containing the precursor with electrodes powered, for example, at a RF frequency as defined above, for example a frequency of from 10 kHz to less than 300 MHz, optionally from 1 to 50 MHz, even optionally from 10 to 15 MHz, optionally a frequency of 13.56 MHz.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the plasma is generated by energizing the gaseous reactant containing the precursor with electrodes supplied with an electric power of from 0.1 to 25 W, optionally from 1 to 22 W, optionally from 3 to 17 W, even optionally from 5 to 14 W, optionally from 7 to 11 W, optionally 8 W. The ratio of the electrode power to the plasma volume can be less than 10 W/ml, optionally is from 5 W/ml to 0.1 W/ml, optionally is from 4 W/ml to 0.1 W/ml, optionally is from 2 W/ml to 0.2 W/ml. These power levels are suitable for applying lubricity layers to syringes and sample tubes and vessels of similar geometry having a void volume of 1 to 3 mL in which PECVD plasma is generated. It is contemplated that for larger or smaller objects the power applied should be increased or reduced accordingly to scale the process to the size of the substrate.


VII.B.1.a. Another embodiment is a lubricity layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, on the inner wall of a syringe barrel. The coating is produced from a PECVD process using the following materials and conditions. A cyclic precursor is optionally employed, selected from a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, or a combination of two or more of these, as defined elsewhere in this specification for lubricity layers. One example of a suitable cyclic precursor comprises octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS), optionally mixed with other precursor materials in any proportion. Optionally, the cyclic precursor consists essentially of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS), meaning that other precursors can be present in amounts which do not change the basic and novel properties of the resulting lubricity layer, i.e. its reduction of the plunger sliding force or breakout force of the coated contact surface.


VII.B.1.a. At least essentially no oxygen as defined in the Definition Section is added to the process.


VII.B.1.a. A sufficient plasma generation power input, for example any power level successfully used in one or more working examples of this specification or described in the specification, is provided to induce coating formation.


VII.B.1.a. The materials and conditions employed are effective to reduce the syringe plunger sliding force or breakout force moving through the syringe barrel at least 25 percent, alternatively at least 45 percent, alternatively at least 60 percent, alternatively greater than 60 percent, relative to an uncoated syringe barrel. Ranges of plunger sliding force or breakout force reduction of from 20 to 95 percent, alternatively from 30 to 80 percent, alternatively from 40 to 75 percent, alternatively from 60 to 70 percent, are contemplated.


VII.B.1.a. Another embodiment is a vessel having a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, on the inside wall. The coating is made as explained for the lubricant coating of similar composition, but under conditions effective to form a hydrophobic contact surface having a higher contact angle than the untreated substrate.


VII.B.1.a. Respecting any of the Embodiments VII.A.1.a.ii, optionally the substrate comprises glass or a polymer. The glass optionally is borosilicate glass. The polymer is optionally a polycarbonate polymer, optionally an olefin polymer, optionally a cyclic olefin copolymer, optionally a polypropylene polymer, optionally a polyester polymer, optionally a polyethylene terephthalate polymer.


VII.B.1.a. Another embodiment is a syringe including a plunger, a syringe barrel, and a lubricity layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section. The syringe barrel includes an interior contact surface receiving the plunger for sliding. The lubricity layer is disposed on the interior contact surface of the syringe barrel. The lubricity layer is less than 1000 nm thick and effective to reduce the breakout force or the plunger sliding force necessary to move the plunger within the barrel. Reducing the plunger sliding force is alternatively expressed as reducing the coefficient of sliding friction of the plunger within the barrel or reducing the plunger force; these terms are regarded as having the same meaning in this specification.


VII.B.1.a. Any of the above precursors of any type can be used alone or in combinations of two or more of them to provide a lubricity layer.


VII.B.1.a. In addition to utilizing vacuum processes, low temperature atmospheric (non-vacuum) plasma processes can also be utilized to induce molecular ionization and deposition through precursor monomer vapor delivery optionally in a non-oxidizing atmosphere such as helium or argon. Separately, thermal CVD can be considered via flash thermolysis deposition.


VII.B.1.a. The approaches above are similar to vacuum PECVD in that the contact surface coating and crosslinking mechanisms can occur simultaneously.


VII.B.1.a. Yet another expedient contemplated for any coating or coatings described here is a coating that is not uniformly applied over the entire interior 88 of a vessel. For example, a different or additional coating can be applied selectively to the cylindrical portion of the vessel interior, compared to the hemispherical portion of the vessel interior at its closed end 84, or vice versa. This expedient is particularly contemplated for a syringe barrel or a sample collection tube as described below, in which a lubricity layer might be provided on part or all of the cylindrical portion of the barrel, where the plunger or piston or closure slides, and not elsewhere.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the precursor can be provided in the presence, substantial absence, or absence of oxygen, in the presence, substantial absence, or absence of nitrogen, or in the presence, substantial absence, or absence of a carrier gas. In one contemplated embodiment, the precursor alone is delivered to the substrate and subjected to PECVD to apply and cure the coating.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the precursor can be provided at less than 1 Torr absolute pressure.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the precursor can be provided to the vicinity of a plasma emission.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the precursor its reaction product can be applied to the substrate at a thickness of 1 to 5000 nm, or 10 to 1000 nm, or 10-200 nm, or 20 to 100 nm.


VII.B.1.a. In any of the above embodiments, the substrate can comprise glass, or a polymer, for example one or more of a polycarbonate polymer, an olefin polymer (for example a cyclic olefin copolymer or a polypropylene polymer), or a polyester polymer (for example, a polyethylene terephthalate polymer).


VII.B.1.a. In any of the above embodiments, the plasma is generated by energizing the gaseous reactant containing the precursor with electrodes powered at a RF frequency as defined in this description.


VII.B.1.a. In any of the above embodiments, the plasma is generated by energizing the gaseous reactant containing the precursor with electrodes supplied with sufficient electric power to generate a lubricity layer. Optionally, the plasma is generated by energizing the gaseous reactant containing the precursor with electrodes supplied with an electric power of from 0.1 to 25 W, optionally from 1 to 22 W, optionally from 3 to 17 W, even optionally from 5 to 14 W, optionally from 7 to 11 W, optionally 8 W. The ratio of the electrode power to the plasma volume can be less than 10 W/ml, optionally is from 5 W/ml to 0.1 W/ml, optionally is from 4 W/ml to 0.1 W/ml, optionally from 2 W/ml to 0.2 W/ml. These power levels are suitable for applying lubricity layers to syringes and sample tubes and vessels of similar geometry having a void volume of 1 to 3 mL in which PECVD plasma is generated. It is contemplated that for larger or smaller objects the power applied should be increased or reduced accordingly to scale the process to the size of the substrate.


VII.B.1.a. The coating can be cured, as by polymerizing or crosslinking the coating, or both, to form a lubricated contact surface having a lower plunger sliding force or breakout force than the untreated substrate. Curing can occur during the application process such as PECVD, or can be carried out or at least completed by separate processing.


VII.B.1.a. Although plasma deposition has been used herein to demonstrate the coating characteristics, alternate deposition methods can be used as long as the chemical composition of the starting material is preserved as much as possible while still depositing a solid film that is adhered to the base substrate.


VII.B.1.a. For example, the coating material can be applied onto the syringe barrel (from the liquid state) by spraying the coating or dipping the substrate into the coating, where the coating is either the neat precursor a solvent-diluted precursor (allowing the mechanical deposition of a thinner coating). The coating optionally can be crosslinked using thermal energy, UV energy, electron beam energy, plasma energy, or any combination of these.


VII.B.1.a. Application of a silicone precursor as described above onto a contact surface followed by a separate curing step is also contemplated. The conditions of application and curing can be analogous to those used for the atmospheric plasma curing of pre-coated polyfluoroalkyl ethers, a process practiced under the trademark TriboGlide®. More details of this process can be found at http://www.triboglide.com/process.htm.


VII.B.1.a. In such a process, the area of the part to be coated can optionally be pre-treated with an atmospheric plasma. This pretreatment cleans and activates the contact surface so that it is receptive to the lubricant that is sprayed in the next step.


VII.B.1.a. The lubrication fluid, in this case one of the above precursors or a polymerized precursor, is then sprayed on to the contact surface to be treated. For example, IVEK precision dispensing technology can be used to accurately atomize the fluid and create a uniform coating.


VII.B.1.a. The coating is then bonded or crosslinked to the part, again using an atmospheric plasma field. This both immobilizes the coating and improves the lubricant's performance.


VII.B.1.a. Optionally, the atmospheric plasma can be generated from ambient air in the vessel, in which case no gas feed and no vacuum drawing equipment is needed. Optionally, however, the vessel is at least substantially closed while plasma is generated, to minimize the power requirement and prevent contact of the plasma with contact surfaces or materials outside the vessel.


VII.B.1.a.i. Lubricity Layer: SiOx Barrier, Lubricity Layer, Contact Surface Treatment


Contact Surface Treatment


VII.B.1.a.i. Another embodiment is a syringe comprising a barrel defining a lumen and having an interior contact surface slidably receiving a plunger, i.e. receiving a plunger for sliding contact to the interior contact surface.


VII.B.1.a.i. The syringe barrel is made of thermoplastic base material.


VII.B.1.a.i. Optionally, the interior contact surface of the barrel is coated with an SiOx barrier layer as described elsewhere in this specification.


VII.B.1.a.i. A lubricity layer is applied to the barrel interior contact surface, the plunger, or both, or to the previously applied SiOx barrier layer. The lubricity layer can be provided, applied, and cured as set out in embodiment VII.B.1.a or elsewhere in this specification.


VII.B.1.a.i. For example, the lubricity layer can be applied, in any embodiment, by PECVD. The lubricity layer is deposited from an organosilicon precursor, and is less than 1000 nm thick.


VII.B.1.a.i. A contact surface treatment is carried out on the lubricity layer in an amount effective to reduce the leaching or extractables of the lubricity layer, the thermoplastic base material, or both. The treated contact surface can thus act as a solute retainer. This contact surface treatment can result in a skin coating, e.g. a skin coating which is at least 1 nm thick and less than 100 nm thick, or less than 50 nm thick, or less than 40 nm thick, or less than 30 nm thick, or less than 20 nm thick, or less than 10 nm thick, or less than 5 nm thick, or less than 3 nm thick, or less than 2 nm thick, or less than 1 nm thick, or less than 0.5 nm thick.


VII.B.1.a.i. As used herein, “leaching” refers to material transferred out of a substrate, such as a vessel wall, into the contents of a vessel, for example a syringe. Commonly, leachables are measured by storing the vessel filled with intended contents, then analyzing the contents to determine what material leached from the vessel wall into the intended contents. “Extraction” refers to material removed from a substrate by introducing a solvent or dispersion medium other than the intended contents of the vessel, to determine what material can be removed from the substrate into the extraction medium under the conditions of the test.


VII.B.1.a.i. The contact surface treatment resulting in a solute retainer optionally can be a SiOx layer as previously defined in this specification or a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section. In one embodiment, the contact surface treatment can be applied by PECVD deposit of SiOx or a hydrophobic layer. Optionally, the contact surface treatment can be applied using higher power or stronger oxidation conditions than used for creating the lubricity layer, or both, thus providing a harder, thinner, continuous solute retainer 539. Contact surface treatment can be less than 100 nm deep, optionally less than 50 nm deep, optionally less than 40 nm deep, optionally less than 30 nm deep, optionally less than 20 nm deep, optionally less than 10 nm deep, optionally less than 5 nm deep, optionally less than 3 nm deep, optionally less than 1 nm deep, optionally less than 0.5 nm deep, optionally between 0.1 and 50 nm deep in the lubricity layer.


VII.B.1.a.i. The solute retainer is contemplated to provide low solute leaching performance to the underlying lubricity and other layers, including the substrate, as required. This retainer would only need to be a solute retainer to large solute molecules and oligomers (for example siloxane monomers such as HMDSO, OMCTS, their fragments and mobile oligomers derived from lubricants, for example a “leachables retainer”) and not a gas (O2/N2/CO2/water vapor) barrier layer. A solute retainer can, however, also be a gas barrier (e.g. the SiOx coating according to present invention. One can create a good leachable retainer without gas barrier performance, either by vacuum or atmospheric-based PECVD processes. It is desirable that the “leachables barrier” will be sufficiently thin that, upon syringe plunger movement, the plunger will readily penetrate the “solute retainer” exposing the sliding plunger nipple to the lubricity layer immediately below to form a lubricated contact surface having a lower plunger sliding force or breakout force than the untreated substrate.


VII.B.1.a.i. In another embodiment, the contact surface treatment can be performed by oxidizing the contact surface of a previously applied lubricity layer, as by exposing the contact surface to oxygen in a plasma environment. The plasma environment described in this specification for forming SiOx coatings can be used. Or, atmospheric plasma conditions can be employed in an oxygen-rich environment.


VII.B.1.a.i. The lubricity layer and solute retainer, however formed, optionally can be cured at the same time. In another embodiment, the lubricity layer can be at least partially cured, optionally fully cured, after which the contact surface treatment can be provided, applied, and the solute retainer can be cured.


VII.B.1.a.i. The lubricity layer and solute retainer are composed, and present in relative amounts, effective to provide a breakout force, plunger sliding force, or both that is less than the corresponding force required in the absence of the lubricity layer and contact surface treatment. In other words, the thickness and composition of the solute retainer are such as to reduce the leaching of material from the lubricity layer into the contents of the syringe, while allowing the underlying lubricity layer to lubricate the plunger. It is contemplated that the solute retainer will break away easily and be thin enough that the lubricity layer will still function to lubricate the plunger when it is moved.


VII.B.1.a.i. In one contemplated embodiment, the lubricity and contact surface treatments can be applied on the barrel interior contact surface. In another contemplated embodiment, the lubricity and contact surface treatments can be applied on the plunger. In still another contemplated embodiment, the lubricity and contact surface treatments can be applied both on the barrel interior contact surface and on the plunger. In any of these embodiments, the optional SiOx barrier layer on the interior of the syringe barrel can either be present or absent.


VII.B.1.a.i. One embodiment contemplated is a plural-layer, e.g. a 3-layer, configuration applied to the inside contact surface of a syringe barrel. Layer 1 can be an SiOx gas barrier made by PECVD of HMDSO, OMCTS, or both, in an oxidizing atmosphere. Such an atmosphere can be provided, for example, by feeding HMDSO and oxygen gas to a PECVD coating apparatus as described in this specification. Layer 2 can be a lubricity layer using OMCTS applied in a non-oxidizing atmosphere. Such a non-oxidizing atmosphere can be provided, for example, by feeding OMCTS to a PECVD coating apparatus as described in this specification, optionally in the substantial or complete absence of oxygen. A subsequent solute retainer can be formed by a treatment forming a thin skin layer of SiOx or a hydrophobic layer as a solute retainer using higher power and oxygen using OMCTS and/or HMDSO.


VII.B.1.a.i. Certain of these plural-layer coatings are contemplated to have one or more of the following optional advantages, at least to some degree. They can address the reported difficulty of handling silicone, since the solute retainer can confine the interior silicone and prevent it from migrating into the contents of the syringe or elsewhere, resulting in fewer silicone particles in the deliverable contents of the syringe and less opportunity for interaction between the lubricity layer and the contents of the syringe. They can also address the issue of migration of the lubricity layer away from the point of lubrication, improving the lubricity of the interface between the syringe barrel and the plunger. For example, the break-free force can be reduced and the drag on the moving plunger can be reduced, or optionally both.


VII.B.1.a.i. It is contemplated that when the solute retainer is broken, the solute retainer will continue to adhere to the lubricity layer and the syringe barrel, which can inhibit any particles from being entrained in the deliverable contents of the syringe.


VII.B.1.a.i. Certain of these coatings will also provide manufacturing advantages, particularly if the barrier coating, lubricity layer and contact surface treatment are applied in the same apparatus, for example the illustrated PECVD apparatus. Optionally, the SiOx barrier coating, lubricity layer, and contact surface treatment can all be applied in one PECVD apparatus, thus greatly reducing the amount of handling necessary.


Further advantages can be obtained by forming the barrier coating, lubricity layer, and solute retainer using the same precursors and varying the process. For example, an SiOx gas barrier layer can be applied using an OMCTS precursor under high power/high O2 conditions, followed by applying a lubricity layer applied using an OMCTS precursor under low power and/or in the substantial or complete absence of oxygen, finishing with a contact surface treatment using an OMCTS precursor under intermediate power and oxygen.


VII.B.1.b Syringe Having Barrel with SiOx Coated Interior and Barrier Coated Exterior


VII.B.1.b. In any embodiment, the thermoplastic base material optionally can include a polyolefin, for example polypropylene or a cyclic olefin copolymer (for example the material sold under the trademark TOPAS®), a polyester, for example polyethylene terephthalate, a polycarbonate, for example a bisphenol A polycarbonate thermoplastic, or other materials. Composite syringe barrels are contemplated having any one of these materials as an outer layer and the same or a different one of these materials as an inner layer. Any of the material combinations of the composite syringe barrels or sample tubes described elsewhere in this specification can also be used.


VII.B.1.b. In any embodiment, the resin optionally can include polyvinylidene chloride in homopolymer or copolymer form. For example, the PVdC homopolymers (trivial name: Saran) or copolymers described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,165,566, incorporated here by reference, can be employed. The resin optionally can be applied onto the exterior contact surface of the barrel in the form of a latex or other dispersion.


VII.B.1.b. In any embodiment, the syringe barrel 548 optionally can include a lubricity layer disposed between the plunger and the barrier coating of SiOx. Suitable lubricity layers are described elsewhere in this specification.


VII.B.1.b. In any embodiment, the lubricity layer optionally can be applied by PECVD and optionally can include material characterized as defined in the Definition Section.


VII.B.1.b. In any embodiment, the syringe barrel 548 optionally can include a contact surface treatment covering the lubricity layer in an amount effective to reduce the leaching of the lubricity layer, constituents of the thermoplastic base material, or both into the lumen 604.


VII.B.1.c Method of Making Syringe Having Barrel with SiOx Coated Interior and Barrier Coated Exterior


VII.B.1.c. Even another embodiment is a method of making a syringe as described in any of the embodiments of part VII.B.1.b, including a plunger, a barrel, and interior and exterior barrier coatings. A barrel is provided having an interior contact surface for receiving the plunger for sliding and an exterior contact surface. A barrier coating of SiOx is provided on the interior contact surface of the barrel by PECVD. A barrier coating of a resin is provided on the exterior contact surface of the barrel. The plunger and barrel are assembled to provide a syringe.


VII.B.1.c. For effective coating (uniform wetting) of the plastic article with the aqueous latex, it is contemplated to be useful to match the contact surface tension of the latex to the plastic substrate. This can be accomplished by several approaches, independently or combined, for example, reducing the contact surface tension of the latex (with surfactants or solvents), and/or corona pretreatment of the plastic article, and/or chemical priming of the plastic article.


VII.B.1.c. The resin optionally can be applied via dip coating of the latex onto the exterior contact surface of the barrel, spray coating of the latex onto the exterior contact surface of the barrel, or both, providing plastic-based articles offering improved gas and vapor barrier performance. Polyvinylidene chloride plastic laminate articles can be made that provide significantly improved gas barrier performance versus the non-laminated plastic article.


VII.B.1.c. In any embodiment, the resin optionally can be heat cured. The resin optionally can be cured by removing water. Water can be removed by heat curing the resin, exposing the resin to a partial vacuum or low-humidity environment, catalytically curing the resin, or other expedients.


VII.B.1.c. An effective thermal cure schedule is contemplated to provide final drying to permit PVdC crystallization, offering barrier performance. Primary curing can be carried out at an elevated temperature, for example between 180-310° F. (82-154° C.), of course depending on the heat tolerance of the thermoplastic base material. Barrier performance after the primary cure optionally can be about 85% of the ultimate barrier performance achieved after a final cure.


VII.B.1.c. A final cure can be carried out at temperatures ranging from ambient temperature, such as about 65-75° F. (18-24° C.) for a long time (such as 2 weeks) to an elevated temperature, such as 122° F. (50° C.), for a short time, such as four hours.


VII.B.1.c. The PVdC-plastic laminate articles, in addition to superior barrier performance, are optionally contemplated to provide one or more desirable properties such as colorless transparency, good gloss, abrasion resistance, printability, and mechanical strain resistance.


VII.B.2. Plungers


VII.B.2.a. With Barrier Coated Piston Front Face


VII.B.2.a. Another embodiment is a plunger for a syringe, including a piston and a push rod. The piston has a front face, a generally cylindrical side face, and a back portion, the side face being configured to movably seat within a syringe barrel. The front face has a barrier coating. The push rod engages the back portion and is configured for advancing the piston in a syringe barrel.


VII.B.2.b. With Lubricity Layer Interfacing with Side Face


VII.B.2.b. Yet another embodiment is a plunger for a syringe, including a piston, a lubricity layer, and a push rod. The piston has a front face, a generally cylindrical side face, and a back portion. The side face is configured to movably seat within a syringe barrel. The lubricity layer interfaces with the side face. The push rod engages the back portion of the piston and is configured for advancing the piston in a syringe barrel.


VII.B.3. Two Piece Syringe and Luer Fitting


VII.B.3. Another embodiment is a syringe including a plunger, a syringe barrel, and a Luer fitting. The syringe includes a barrel having an interior contact surface receiving the plunger for sliding. The Luer fitting includes a Luer taper having an internal passage defined by an internal contact surface. The Luer fitting is formed as a separate piece from the syringe barrel and joined to the syringe barrel by a coupling. The internal passage of the Luer taper has a barrier coating of SiOx.


VII.B.4. Lubricant Compositions—Lubricity Layer Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor Made by In Situ Polymerizing Organosilicon Precursor


VII.B.4.a. Product by Process and Lubricity


VII.B.4.a. Still another embodiment is a lubricity layer. This coating can be of the type made by the following process.


VII.B.4.a. Any of the precursors mentioned elsewhere in this specification can be used, alone or in combination. The precursor is applied to a substrate under conditions effective to form a coating. The coating is polymerized or crosslinked, or both, to form a lubricated contact surface having a lower plunger sliding force or breakout force than the untreated substrate.


VII.B.4.a. Another embodiment is a method of applying a lubricity layer. An organosilicon precursor is applied to a substrate under conditions effective to form a coating. The coating is polymerized or crosslinked, or both, to form a lubricated contact surface having a lower plunger sliding force or breakout force than the untreated substrate.


VII.B.4.b. Product by Process and Analytical Properties


VII.B.4.b. Even another aspect of the invention is a lubricity layer deposited by PECVD from a feed gas comprising an organometallic precursor, optionally an organosilicon precursor, optionally a linear siloxane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic siloxane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polycyclic silazane, or any combination of two or more of these. The coating has a density between 1.25 and 1.65 g/cm3 optionally between 1.35 and 1.55 g/cm3, optionally between 1.4 and 1.5 g/cm3, optionally between 1.44 and 1.48 g/cm3 as determined by X-ray reflectivity (XRR).


VII.B.4.b. Still another aspect of the invention is a lubricity layer deposited by PECVD from a feed gas comprising an organometallic precursor, optionally an organosilicon precursor, optionally a linear siloxane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic siloxane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polycyclic silazane, or any combination of two or more of these. The coating has as an outgas component one or more oligomers containing repeating -(Me)2SiO— moieties, as determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Optionally, the coating meets the limitations of any of embodiments VII.B.4.a or VII.B.4.b.A.585h. Optionally, the coating outgas component as determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry is substantially free of trimethylsilanol.


VII.B.4.b. Optionally, the coating outgas component can be at least 10 ng/test of oligomers containing repeating -(Me)2SiO— moieties, as determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using the following test conditions:

    • GC Column: 30 m×0.25 mm DB-5MS (J&W Scientific), 0.25 μm film thickness
    • Flow rate: 1.0 ml/min, constant flow mode
    • Detector: Mass Selective Detector (MSD)
    • Injection Mode: Split injection (10:1 split ratio)
    • Outgassing Conditions: 1½″ (37 mm) Chamber, purge for three hour at 85° C., flow 60 ml/min
    • Oven temperature: 40° C. (5 min.) to 300° C. at 10° C./min.; hold for 5 min. at 300° C.


VII.B.4.b. Optionally, the outgas component can include at least 20 ng/test of oligomers containing repeating -(Me)2SiO— moieties.


VII.B.4.b. Optionally, the feed gas comprises a monocyclic siloxane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polycyclic silazane, or any combination of two or more of these, for example a monocyclic siloxane, a monocyclic silazane, or any combination of two or more of these, for example octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane.


VII.B.4.b. The lubricity layer of any embodiment can have a thickness measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) between 1 and 500 nm, optionally between 10 and 500 nm, optionally between 20 and 200 nm, optionally between 20 and 100 nm, optionally between 30 and 100 nm.


VII.B.4.b. Another aspect of the invention is a lubricity layer deposited by PECVD from a feed gas comprising a monocyclic siloxane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polycyclic silazane, or any combination of two or more of these. The coating has an atomic concentration of carbon, normalized to 100% of carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), greater than the atomic concentration of carbon in the atomic formula for the feed gas. Optionally, the coating meets the limitations of embodiments VII.B.4.a or VII.B.4.b.A.


VII.B.4.b. Optionally, the atomic concentration of carbon increases by from 1 to 80 atomic percent (as calculated and based on the XPS conditions in Example 13), alternatively from 10 to 70 atomic percent, alternatively from 20 to 60 atomic percent, alternatively from 30 to 50 atomic percent, alternatively from 35 to 45 atomic percent, alternatively from 37 to 41 atomic percent.


VII.B.4.b. An additional aspect of the invention is a lubricity layer deposited by PECVD from a feed gas comprising a monocyclic siloxane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polycyclic silazane, or any combination of two or more of these. The coating has an atomic concentration of silicon, normalized to 100% of carbon, oxygen, and silicon, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), less than the atomic concentration of silicon in the atomic formula for the feed gas. Optionally, the coating meets the limitations of embodiments VII.B.4.a or VII.B.4.b.A.


VII.B.4.b. Optionally, the atomic concentration of silicon decreases by from 1 to 80 atomic percent (as calculated and based on the XPS conditions in Example 13), alternatively from 10 to 70 atomic percent, alternatively from 20 to 60 atomic percent, alternatively from 30 to 55 atomic percent, alternatively from 40 to 50 atomic percent, alternatively from 42 to 46 atomic percent.


VII.B.4.b. Lubricity layers having combinations of any two or more properties recited in Section VII.B.4 are also expressly contemplated.


VII.C. Vessels Generally


VII.C. A coated vessel or container as described herein and/or prepared according to a method described herein can be used for reception and/or storage and/or delivery of a compound or composition. The compound or composition can be sensitive, for example air-sensitive, oxygen-sensitive, sensitive to humidity and/or sensitive to mechanical influences. It can be a biologically active compound or composition, for example a medicament like insulin or a composition comprising insulin. In another aspect, it can be a biological fluid, optionally a bodily fluid, for example blood or a blood fraction. In certain aspects of the present invention, the compound or composition is a product to be administrated to a subject in need thereof, for example a product to be injected, like blood (as in transfusion of blood from a donor to a recipient or reintroduction of blood from a patient back to the patient) or insulin.


VII.C. A coated vessel or container as described herein and/or prepared according to a method described herein can further be used for protecting a compound or composition contained in its interior space against mechanical and/or chemical effects of the contact surface of the uncoated vessel material. For example, it can be used for preventing or reducing precipitation and/or clotting or platelet activation of the compound or a component of the composition, for example insulin precipitation or blood clotting or platelet activation.


VII.C. It can further be used for protecting a compound or composition contained in its interior against the environment outside of the vessel, for example by preventing or reducing the entry of one or more compounds from the environment surrounding the vessel into the interior space of the vessel. Such environmental compound can be a gas or liquid, for example an atmospheric gas or liquid containing oxygen, air, and/or water vapor.


VII.C. A coated vessel as described herein can also be evacuated and stored in an evacuated state. For example, the coating allows better maintenance of the vacuum in comparison to a corresponding uncoated vessel. In one aspect of this embodiment, the coated vessel is a blood collection tube. The tube can also contain an agent for preventing blood clotting or platelet activation, for example EDTA or heparin.


VII.C. Any of the above-described embodiments can be made, for example, by providing as the vessel a length of tubing from about 1 cm to about 200 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 150 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 120 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 100 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 80 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 60 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 40 cm, optionally from about 1 cm to about 30 cm long, and processing it with a probe electrode as described below. Particularly for the longer lengths in the above ranges, it is contemplated that relative motion between the probe and the vessel can be useful during coating formation. This can be done, for example, by moving the vessel with respect to the probe or moving the probe with respect to the vessel.


VII.C. In these embodiments, it is contemplated that the coating can be thinner or less complete than can be preferred for a barrier coating, as the vessel in some embodiments will not require the high barrier integrity of an evacuated blood collection tube.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel has a central axis.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel wall is sufficiently flexible to be flexed at least once at 20° C., without breaking the wall, over a range from at least substantially straight to a bending radius at the central axis of not more than 100 times as great as the outer diameter of the vessel.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the bending radius at the central axis is not more than 90 times as great as, or not more than 80 times as great as, or not more than 70 times as great as, or not more than 60 times as great as, or not more than 50 times as great as, or not more than 40 times as great as, or not more than 30 times as great as, or not more than 20 times as great as, or not more than 10 times as great as, or not more than 9 times as great as, or not more than 8 times as great as, or not more than 7 times as great as, or not more than 6 times as great as, or not more than 5 times as great as, or not more than 4 times as great as, or not more than 3 times as great as, or not more than 2 times as great as, or not more than, the outer diameter of the vessel.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel wall can be a fluid-contacting contact surface made of flexible material.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel lumen can be the fluid flow passage of a pump.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel can be a blood bag adapted to maintain blood in good condition for medical use.


VII.C., VII.D. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the polymeric material can be a silicone elastomer or a thermoplastic polyurethane, as two examples, or any material suitable for contact with blood, or with insulin.


VII.C., VII.D. In an optional embodiment, the vessel has an inner diameter of at least 2 mm, or at least 4 mm.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the vessel is a tube.


VII.C. As an optional feature of any of the foregoing embodiments the lumen has at least two open ends.


VII.C.1. Vessel Containing Viable Blood, Having a Coating Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor


VII.C.1. Even another embodiment is a blood containing vessel. Several non-limiting examples of such a vessel are a blood transfusion bag, a blood sample collection vessel in which a sample has been collected, the tubing of a heart-lung machine, a flexible-walled blood collection bag, or tubing used to collect a patient's blood during surgery and reintroduce the blood into the patient's vasculature. If the vessel includes a pump for pumping blood, a particularly suitable pump is a centrifugal pump or a peristaltic pump. The vessel has a wall; the wall has an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface of the wall has an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section. The coating can be as thin as monomolecular thickness or as thick as about 1000 nm. The vessel contains blood viable for return to the vascular system of a patient disposed within the lumen in contact with the hydrophobic layer.


VII.C.1. An embodiment is a blood containing vessel including a wall and having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface has an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer. The coating can also comprise or consist essentially of SiOx, where x is as defined in this specification. The thickness of the coating is within the range from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface. The vessel contains blood viable for return to the vascular system of a patient disposed within the lumen in contact with the hydrophobic layer.


VII.C.2. Coating Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor Reduces Clotting or Platelet Activation of Blood in the Vessel


VII.C.2. Another embodiment is a vessel having a wall. The wall has an inner contact surface defining a lumen and has an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer, where optionally w, x, y, and z are as previously defined in the Definition Section. The thickness of the coating is from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface. The coating is effective to reduce the clotting or platelet activation of blood exposed to the inner contact surface, compared to the same type of wall uncoated with a hydrophobic layer.


VII.C.2. It is contemplated that the incorporation of a hydrophobic layer will reduce the adhesion or clot forming tendency of the blood, as compared to its properties in contact with an unmodified polymeric or SiOx contact surface. This property is contemplated to reduce or potentially eliminate the need for treating the blood with heparin, as by reducing the necessary blood concentration of heparin in a patient undergoing surgery of a type requiring blood to be removed from the patient and then returned to the patient, as when using a heart-lung machine during cardiac surgery. It is contemplated that this will reduce the complications of surgery involving the passage of blood through such a vessel, by reducing the bleeding complications resulting from the use of heparin.


VII.C.2. Another embodiment is a vessel including a wall and having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface has an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer, the thickness of the coating being from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface, the coating being effective to reduce the clotting or platelet activation of blood exposed to the inner contact surface.


VII.C.3. Vessel Containing Viable Blood, Having a Coating of Group III or IV Element


VII.C.3. Another embodiment is a blood containing vessel having a wall having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface has an at least partial coating of a composition comprising one or more elements of Group III, one or more elements of Group IV, or a combination of two or more of these. The thickness of the coating is between monomolecular thickness and about 1000 nm thick, inclusive, on the inner contact surface. The vessel contains blood viable for return to the vascular system of a patient disposed within the lumen in contact with the hydrophobic layer.


VII.C.4. Coating of Group III or IV Element Reduces Clotting or Platelet Activation of Blood in the Vessel


VII.C.4. Optionally, in the vessel of the preceding paragraph, the coating of the Group III or IV Element is effective to reduce the clotting or platelet activation of blood exposed to the inner contact surface of the vessel wall.


VII.D. Pharmaceutical Delivery Vessels


VII.D. A coated vessel or container as described herein can be used for preventing or reducing the escape of a compound or composition contained in the vessel into the environment surrounding the vessel.


Further uses of the coating and vessel as described herein, which are apparent from any part of the description and claims, are also contemplated.


VII.D.1. Vessel Containing Insulin, Having a Coating Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor


VII.D.1. Another embodiment is an insulin containing vessel including a wall having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface has an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section. The coating can be from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface. Insulin is disposed within the lumen in contact with the SiwOxCyHz coating.


VII.D.1. Still another embodiment is an insulin containing vessel including a wall and having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface has an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, the thickness of the coating being from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface. Insulin, for example pharmaceutical insulin FDA approved for human use, is disposed within the lumen in contact with the hydrophobic layer.


VII.D.1. It is contemplated that the incorporation of a hydrophobic layer, characterized as defined in the Definition Section, will reduce the adhesion or precipitation forming tendency of the insulin in a delivery tube of an insulin pump, as compared to its properties in contact with an unmodified polymeric contact surface. This property is contemplated to reduce or potentially eliminate the need for filtering the insulin passing through the delivery tube to remove a solid precipitate.


VII.D.2. Coating Deposited from an Organosilicon Precursor Reduces Precipitation of Insulin in the Vessel


VII.D.2. Optionally, in the vessel of the preceding paragraph, the coating of a hydrophobic layer is effective to reduce the formation of a precipitate from insulin contacting the inner contact surface, compared to the same contact surface absent the hydrophobic layer.


VII.D.2. Even another embodiment is a vessel again comprising a wall and having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface includes an at least partial coating of a hydrophobic layer. The thickness of the coating is in the range from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface. The coating is effective to reduce the formation of a precipitate from insulin contacting the inner contact surface.


VII.D.3. Vessel Containing Insulin, Having a Coating of Group III or IV Element


VII.D.3. Another embodiment is an insulin containing vessel including a wall having an inner contact surface defining a lumen. The inner contact surface has an at least partial coating of a composition comprising carbon, one or more elements of Group III, one or more elements of Group IV, or a combination of two or more of these. The coating can be from monomolecular thickness to about 1000 nm thick on the inner contact surface. Insulin is disposed within the lumen in contact with the coating.


VII.D.4. Coating of Group III or IV Element Reduces Precipitation of Insulin in the Vessel


VII.D.4. Optionally, in the vessel of the preceding paragraph, the coating of a composition comprising carbon, one or more elements of Group III, one or more elements of Group IV, or a combination of two or more of these, is effective to reduce the formation of a precipitate from insulin contacting the inner contact surface, compared to the same contact surface absent the coating.


Other Types of Medical Devices


A wide variety of medical devices having one or more coatings as defined in the present disclosure are contemplated. Some specific examples of such devices follow.


Anesthesia ventilators are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating on a bellows cylinder. The ventilator cylinders can be SiOx coated to eliminate gas diffusion.


Buccal sample cassettes are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier.


Capillary Blood Collection devices are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier to keep constituents of the device wall from leaching into the blood or vice versa.


Centrifuge components, in particular centrifuge vials, tubes, or other containers are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier to provide reduced plastic contamination.


Containers are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier where plastic contamination control or O2 barrier control is desirable.


Drug-Eluting Stents, for example Self-Expandable Metallic Stents, Vascular Ring Connectors, and Vascular Stents are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy controlled porosity layer to control the rate of drug elution from the stent.


Inhalers are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier. A coated plastic tube in the device inhibits vapor absorption.


Insulin pens are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coated cartridge, analogous to the coating contemplated for the barrel of a syringe.


Insulin pumps are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier to improve delivery and provide a barrier in the reservoir of the pump.


IV Adapters are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier to prevent plastic extraction into blood.


Medical ventilators are contemplated employing an SiOx antifog layer to prevent the facemask from fogging in use.


Pipettes are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating.


Sample collection containers are contemplated employing an SiOx wetting/barrier coating.


Sample Collection Tubes and Storage Devices are contemplated employing an SiOx wetting/barrier coating.


Shaker flasks are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating for reduced leaching to or from their glass or plastic walls.


Tissue grinders are contemplated employing an SiOx abrasion/barrier coating, at least in the grinder container.


Urine sample cassettes are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating in the sample container, as explained above for sample containers generally.


Ankle replacements are contemplated employing an SiOx coating on the metal/ceramic prosthesis.


Implanted cardiac devices such as Artificial Pacemakers and Defibrillators and associated parts are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating.


An artificial pancreas is contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating.


Atherectomy catheters are contemplated employing an SiOx hard/wettable coating. Atherectomy is a procedure that utilizes a catheter with a sharp blade on the end to remove plaque from a blood vessel.


Cell Lifters, Cell Scrapers, and Cell Spreaders, which are polyethylene molded devices for recombinant cell removal, are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating to prevent plastic/additives contamination.


Cornea implants are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating to prevent plastic extractables in the eye.


Cover glasses are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating to provide reduced Na, K, and B leaching into a sample.


Plastic depression microscopic slides are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating for reduced interaction with plastic additives.


Direct Testing and Serology devices are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating for plastic extractables control.


Flat plastic microscopic slides are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating for control of plastic contact (wettability).


Glaucoma valves made of plastic are contemplated employing an SiOx hydrophilic coating for improved wettability of plastic.


Hip Prostheses and re-constructive prosthesis replacements, other joint and cartilage replacements, and orthopedic implants, such as for the hand, knee, and shoulder are contemplated, optionally employing a thick (more than one micron, alternatively several microns) SiOx anti-wear coating on the metal/plastic sleeve or other wear parts.


Medicine and contraceptive implants and implantable devices, for example sub-dermal implants are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy controlled porosity layer to provide controlled release of the medicine.


Lancets, scalpels, razor blades, and sewing and hypodermic needles are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy lubricity layer to facilitate piercing skin and other tissues and objects and reduce friction.


Medical grafting material such as excised skin is contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating to retain moisture. It is contemplated as one alternative that the barrier coating would dissolve when the grafting material was applied, due to contact with body fluids or pretreatment, so it would not impede fluid exchange.


Microtiter plates made of plastic are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating.


Molecular Diagnostics devices such as “lab on chip” devices, microsensors and nanosensors are contemplated employing an SiOx gas barrier coating and/or an SiOxCy or SiNxCy hydrophobic layer as a water barrier.


Mycobacteria Testing Devices such as growth indicator tubes are contemplated employing an SiOx wettability coating, for improved performance.


Catheters, for example Angioplasty Catheters, Urethral Catheters, and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy lubricity layer to ease insertion and removal and reduce friction.


Shunt (medical) skin implants are contemplated employing an SiOx wettability coating.


Stent grafts and Stents are contemplated employing an SiOx wettability coating to provide improved in vivo grafting.


Transdermal implants are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy controlled porosity layer.


Ultrasonic nebulizers are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy controlled porosity or hydrophobic layer to control drop size.


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty devices are contemplated employing a thick SiOx anti-wear coating.


Microchip implants (for humans or animals) are contemplated employing a diamond-like carbon (DLC)-based water and water vapor barrier.


Needleless and conventional IV Connectors are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy lubricity layer to reduce the necessary connection and disconnection force. The SiOxCy or SiNxCy layer can optionally be supplemented with a silver antimicrobial layer and/or an SiOx barrier coating to prevent plastic extract into blood.


Auditory brainstem implants are contemplated employing a diamond-like carbon (DLC) based water and water vapor barrier, particularly for the implanted sensor or power unit.


Goggles are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy hydrophobic layer to provide antifogging lenses.


Stains and Reagents in encapsulated or particulate form are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy controlled porosity layer to provide controlled encapsulation/release.


Prostatic stents are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy controlled porosity layer to provide controlled release of material.


Sutures and surgical staples are contemplated employing an SiOxCy or SiNxCy lubricity layer to make them slide more easily when inserted and removed.


Dehydrated Culture Media devices are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating so their plastic constituents do not extract into culture media.


Cochlear implants are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating to prevent the ingress of ear wax and body fluids.


Petri dishes are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating.


Sacral nerve stimulator wires and implants are contemplated employing an SiOx barrier coating.


Peritoneovenous shunts and fluid drains and Portacaval shunts made of plastic are contemplated employing an SiOx wettability coating.


Surgical microscopes are contemplated employing an SiOx wetting/barrier coating to prevent fogging of the visual aperture.


Plastic Right-to-Left Shunts are contemplated employing an SiOx wettability coating.


Static Control Supplies are contemplated employing an SiOx wettability coating, as adsorbed moisture on the coating will reduce static.


WORKING EXAMPLES
Basic Protocols for Forming and Coating Tubes and Syringe Barrels

The vessels tested in the subsequent working examples were formed and coated according to the exemplary protocols set out in U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188 as incorporated by reference, except as otherwise indicated in individual examples. Whenever parameter values were changed in comparison to these typical values, this will be indicated in the subsequent working examples. The same applies to the type and composition of the process gas.


Example 1

V. In the following test, hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) was used as the organosilicon (“O—Si”) feed to PECVD apparatus of FIG. 1 to apply an SiOx coating on the internal contact surface of a cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) tube as described in the Protocol for Forming COC Tube. The deposition conditions are summarized in the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx and Table 1. The control was the same type of tube to which no barrier coating was applied. The coated and uncoated tubes were then tested for their oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and their water vapor transmission rate (WVTR).


V. Referring to Table 1, the uncoated COC tube had an OTR of 0.215 cc/tube/day. Tubes A and B subjected to PECVD for 14 seconds had an average OTR of 0.0235 cc/tube/day. These results show that the SiOx coating provided an oxygen transmission BIF over the uncoated tube of 9.1. In other words, the SiOx barrier coating reduced the oxygen transmission through the tube to less than one ninth its value without the coating.


V. Tube C subjected to PECVD for 7 seconds had an OTR of 0.026. This result shows that the SiOx coating provided an OTR BIF over the uncoated tube of 8.3. In other words, the SiOx barrier coating applied in 7 seconds reduced the oxygen transmission through the tube to less than one eighth of its value without the coating.


V. The relative WVTRs of the same barrier coatings on COC tubes were also measured. The uncoated COC tube had a WVTR of 0.27 mg/tube/day. Tubes A and B subjected to PECVD for 14 seconds had an average WVTR of 0.10 mg/tube/day or less. Tube C subjected to PECVD for 7 seconds had a WVTR of 0.10 mg/tube/day. This result shows that the SiOx coating provided a water vapor transmission barrier improvement factor (WVTR BIF) over the uncoated tube of about 2.7. This was a surprising result, since the uncoated COC tube already has a very low WVTR.


Example 2

V. A series of PET tubes, made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube, were coated with SiOx according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx under the conditions reported in Table 2. Controls were made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube, but left uncoated. OTR and WVTR samples of the tubes were prepared by epoxy-sealing the open end of each tube to an aluminum adaptor.


V. In a separate test, using the same type of coated PET tubes, mechanical scratches of various lengths were induced with a steel needle through the interior coating, and the OTR BIF was tested. Controls were either left uncoated or were the same type of coated tube without an induced scratch. The OTR BIF, while diminished, was still improved over uncoated tubes (Table 2A).


V. Tubes were tested for OTR as follows. Each sample/adaptor assembly was fitted onto a MOCON® Oxtran 2/21 Oxygen Permeability Instrument. Samples were allowed to equilibrate to transmission rate steady state (1-3 days) under the following test conditions:

    • Test Gas: Oxygen
    • Test Gas Concentration: 100%
    • Test Gas Humidity: 0% relative humidity
    • Test Gas Pressure: 760 mmHg
    • Test Temperature: 23.0° C. (73.4° F.)
    • Carrier Gas: 98% nitrogen, 2% hydrogen
    • Carrier Gas Humidity: 0% relative humidity


V. The OTR is reported as average of two determinations in Table 2.


V. Tubes were tested for WVTR as follows. The sample/adaptor assembly was fitted onto a MOCON® Permatran-W 3/31 Water Vapor Permeability Instrument. Samples were allowed to equilibrate to transmission rate steady state (1-3 days) under the following test conditions:

    • Test Gas: Water Vapor
    • Test Gas Concentration: NA
    • Test Gas Humidity: 100% relative humidity
    • Test Gas Temperature: 37.8(° C.) 100.0(° F.)
    • Carrier Gas: Dry nitrogen
    • Carrier Gas Humidity: 0% relative humidity


V. The WVTR is reported as average of two determinations in Table 2.


Example 3

A series of syringe barrels were made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel. The syringe barrels were either barrier coated with SiOx or not under the conditions reported in the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe barrel Interior with SiOx modified as indicated in Table 3.


OTR and WVTR samples of the syringe barrels were prepared by epoxy-sealing the open end of each syringe barrel to an aluminum adaptor. Additionally, the syringe barrel capillary ends were sealed with epoxy. The syringe-adapter assemblies were tested for OTR or WVTR in the same manner as the PET tube samples, again using a MOCON® Oxtran 2/21 Oxygen Permeability Instrument and a MOCON® Permatran-W 3/31 Water Vapor Permeability Instrument. The results are reported in Table 3.


Example 4
Composition Measurement of Plasma Coatings Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)/Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA) Contact Surface Analysis

V.A. PET tubes made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube and coated according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx were cut in half to expose the inner tube contact surface, which was then analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).


V.A. The XPS data was quantified using relative sensitivity factors and a model which assumes a homogeneous layer. The analysis volume is the product of the analysis area (spot size or aperture size) and the depth of information. Photoelectrons are generated within the X-ray penetration depth (typically many microns), but only the photoelectrons within the top three photoelectron escape depths are detected. Escape depths are on the order of 15-35 Å, which leads to an analysis depth of ˜50-100 Å. Typically, 95% of the signal originates from within this depth.


V.A. Table 5 provides the atomic ratios of the elements detected. The analytical parameters used in for XPS are as follows:


















Instrument
PHI Quantum 2000



X-ray source
Monochromated Alkα 1486.6 eV



Acceptance Angle
±23°



Take-off angle
45°



Analysis area
600 μm



Charge Correction
C1s 284.8 eV



Ion Gun Conditions
Ar+, 1 keV, 2 × 2 mm raster



Sputter Rate
15.6 Å/min (SiO2 Equivalent)










V.A. XPS does not detect hydrogen or helium. Values given are normalized to Si=1 for the experimental number (last row) using the elements detected, and to O=1 for the uncoated polyethylene terephthalate calculation and example. Detection limits are approximately 0.05 to 1.0 atomic percent. Values given are alternatively normalized to 100% Si+O+C atoms.


V.A. The Inventive Example has an Si/O ratio of 2.4 indicating an SiOx composition, with some residual carbon from incomplete oxidation of the coating. This analysis demonstrates the composition of an SiOx barrier layer applied to a polyethylene terephthalate tube according to the present invention.


V.A. Table 4 shows the thickness of the SiOx samples, determined using TEM according to the following method. Samples were prepared for Focused Ion Beam (FIB) cross-sectioning by coating the samples with a sputtered layer of platinum (50-100 nm thick) using a K575X Emitech coating system. The coated samples were placed in an FEI FIB200 FIB system. An additional layer of platinum was FIB-deposited by injection of an organometallic gas while rastering the 30 kV gallium ion beam over the area of interest. The area of interest for each sample was chosen to be a location half way down the length of the tube. Thin cross sections measuring approximately 15 μm (“micrometers”) long, 2 μm wide and 15 μm deep were extracted from the die contact surface using a proprietary in-situ FIB lift-out technique. The cross sections were attached to a 200 mesh copper TEM grid using FIB-deposited platinum. One or two windows in each section, measuring about 8 μm wide, were thinned to electron transparency using the gallium ion beam of the FEI FIB.


V.C. Cross-sectional image analysis of the prepared samples was performed utilizing a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). The imaging data was recorded digitally.


The sample grids were transferred to a Hitachi HF2000 transmission electron microscope. Transmitted electron images were acquired at appropriate magnifications. The relevant instrument settings used during image acquisition are given below.


















Instrument
Transmission Electron




Microscope



Manufacturer/Model
Hitachi HF2000



Accelerating Voltage
200 kV



Condenser Lens 1
0.78



Condenser Lens 2
0



Objective Lens
6.34



Condenser Lens Aperture
#1



Objective Lens Aperture for
#3



imaging



Selective Area Aperture for
N/A



SAD










Example 5
Plasma Uniformity

V.A. COC syringe barrels made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel were treated using the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with SiOx, with the following variations. Three different modes of plasma generation were tested for coating syringe barrels such as 250 with SiOx films. V.A. In Mode 1, hollow cathode plasma ignition was generated in the gas inlet 310, restricted area 292 and processing vessel lumen 304, and ordinary or non-hollow-cathode plasma was generated in the remainder of the vessel lumen 300.


V.A. In Mode 2, hollow cathode plasma ignition was generated in the restricted area 292 and processing vessel lumen 304, and ordinary or non-hollow-cathode plasma was generated in the remainder of the vessel lumen 300 and gas inlet 310.


V.A. In Mode 3, ordinary or non-hollow-cathode plasma was generated in the entire vessel lumen 300 and gas inlet 310. This was accomplished by ramping up power to quench any hollow cathode ignition. Table 6 shows the conditions used to achieve these modes.


V.A. The syringe barrels 250 were then exposed to a ruthenium oxide staining technique. The stain was made from sodium hypochlorite bleach and Ru(III) chloride hydrate. 0.2 g of Ru(III) chloride hydrate was put into a vial. 10 ml bleach were added and mixed thoroughly until the Ru(III) chloride hydrate dissolved.


V.A. Each syringe barrel was sealed with a plastic Luer seal and 3 drops of the staining mixture were added to each syringe barrel. The syringe barrels were then sealed with aluminum tape and allowed to sit for 30-40 minutes. In each set of syringe barrels tested, at least one uncoated syringe barrel was stained. The syringe barrels were stored with the restricted area 292 facing up.


V.A. Based on the staining, the following conclusions were drawn:


V.A. 1. The stain started to attack the uncoated (or poorly coated) areas within 0.25 hours of exposure.


V.A. 2. Ignition in the restricted area 292 resulted in SiOx coating of the restricted area 292.


V.A. 3. The best syringe barrel was produced by the test with no hollow cathode plasma ignition in either the gas inlet 310 or the restricted area 292. Only the restricted opening 294 was stained, most likely due to leaking of the stain.


V.A. 4. Staining is a good qualitative tool to guide uniformity work.


V.A. Based on all of the above, we concluded:


V.A. 1. Under the conditions of the test, hollow cathode plasma in either the gas inlet 310 or the restricted area 292 led to poor uniformity of the coating.


V.A. 2. The best uniformity was achieved with no hollow cathode plasma in either the gas inlet 310 or the restricted area 292.


Example 6
Interference Patterns from Reflectance Measurements—Prophetic Example

VI.A. Using a UV-Visible Source (Ocean Optics DH2000-BAL Deuterium Tungsten 200-1000 nm), a fiber optic reflection probe (combination emitter/collector Ocean Optics QR400-7 SR/BX with approximately 3 mm probe area), miniature detector (Ocean Optics HR4000CG UV-NIR Spectrometer), and software converting the spectrometer signal to a transmittance/wavelength graph on a laptop computer, an uncoated PET tube Becton Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, N.J., USA) Product No. 366703 13×75 mm (no additives) is scanned (with the probe emitting and collecting light radially from the centerline of the tube, thus normal to the coated contact surface) both about the inner circumference of the tube and longitudinally along the inner wall of the tube, with the probe, with no observable interference pattern observed. Then a Becton Dickinson Product No. 366703 13×75 mm (no additives) SiOx plasma-coated BD 366703 tube is coated with a 20 nanometer thick SiO2 coating as described in Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx. This tube is scanned in a similar manner as the uncoated tube. A clear interference pattern is observed with the coated tube, in which certain wavelengths were reinforced and others canceled in a periodic pattern, indicating the presence of a coating on the PET tube.


Example 7
Enhanced Light Transmission from Integrating Sphere Detection

VI.A. The equipment used was a Xenon light source (Ocean Optics HL-2000-HP-FHSA-20 W output Halogen Lamp Source (185-2000 nm)), an Integrating Sphere detector (Ocean Optics ISP-80-8-I) machined to accept a PET tube into its interior, and HR2000+ES Enhanced Sensitivity UV.VIS spectrometer, with light transmission source and light receiver fiber optic sources (QP600-2-UV-VIS—600 um Premium Optical FIBER, UV/VIS, 2 m), and signal conversion software (SPECTRASUITE—Cross-platform Spectroscopy Operating SOFTWARE). An uncoated PET tube made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube was inserted onto a TEFZEL Tube Holder (Puck), and inserted into the integrating sphere. With the Spectrasuite software in absorbance mode, the absorption (at 615 nm) was set to zero. An SiOx coated tube made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube and coated according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx (except as varied in Table 16) was then mounted on the puck, inserted into the integrating sphere and the absorbance recorded at 615 nm wavelength. The data is recorded in Table 16.


VI.A. With the SiOx coated tubes, an increase in absorption relative to the uncoated article was observed; increased coating times resulted in increased absorption. The measurement took less than one second.


VI.A. These spectroscopic methods should not be considered limited by the mode of collection (for example, reflectance vs. transmittance vs. absorbance), the frequency or type of radiation applied, or other parameters.


Example 8
Wetting Tension—Plasma Coated PET Tube Examples

VII.A.1.a.ii. The wetting tension method is a modification of the method described in ASTM D 2578. Wetting tension is a specific measure for the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of a contact surface. This method uses standard wetting tension solutions (called dyne solutions) to determine the solution that comes nearest to wetting a plastic film contact surface for exactly two seconds. This is the film's wetting tension.


VII.A.1.a.ii. The procedure utilized is varied from ASTM D 2578 in that the substrates are not flat plastic films, but are tubes made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube and (except for controls) coated according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with Hydrophobic layer. A silicone coated glass syringe (Becton Dickinson Hypak® PRTC glass prefillable syringe with Luer-lok® tip) (1 mL) was also tested. The results of this test are listed in Table 10.


VII.A.1.a.ii. Surprisingly, plasma coating of uncoated PET tubes (40 dynes/cm) can achieve either higher (more hydrophilic) or lower (more hydrophobic) energy contact surfaces using the same hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) feed gas, by varying the plasma process conditions. A thin (approximately 20-40 nanometers) SiOx coating made according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx (data not shown in the tables) provides similar wettability as hydrophilic bulk glass substrates. A thin (less than about 100 nanometers) hydrophobic layer made according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with Hydrophobic layer provides similar non-wettability as hydrophobic silicone fluids (data not shown in the tables).


Example 9
Vacuum Retention Study of Tubes Via Accelerated Ageing

VII.A.3 Accelerated ageing offers faster assessment of long term shelf-life products. Accelerated ageing of blood tubes for vacuum retention is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,940, Column 1, Lines 11-49.


VII.A.3 Three types of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) 13×75 mm (0.85 mm thick walls) molded tubes were tested:

    • Becton Dickinson Product No. 366703 13×75 mm (no additives) tube (shelf life 545 days or 18 months), closed with Hemogard® system red stopper and uncolored guard [commercial control];
    • PET tubes made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube, closed with the same type of Hemogard® system red stopper and uncolored guard [internal control]; and
    • injection molded PET 13×75 mm tubes, made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube, coated according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx closed with the same type of Hemogard® system red stopper and uncolored guard [inventive sample].


VII.A.3 The BD commercial control was used as received. The internal control and inventive samples were evacuated and capped with the stopper system to provide the desired partial pressure (vacuum) inside the tube after sealing. All samples were placed into a three gallon (3.8 L) 304 SS wide mouth pressure vessel (Sterlitech No. 740340). The pressure vessel was pressurized to 48 psi (3.3 atm, 2482 mm·Hg). Water volume draw change determinations were made by (a) removing 3-5 samples at increasing time intervals, (b) permitting water to draw into the evacuated tubes through a 20 gauge blood collection adaptor from a one liter plastic bottle reservoir, (c) and measuring the mass change before and after water draw.


VII.A.3 Results are indicated on Table 11.


VII.A.3 The Normalized Average Decay Rate is calculated by dividing the time change in mass by the number of pressurization days and initial mass draw [mass change/(days×initial mass)]. The Accelerated Time to 10% Loss (months) is also calculated. Both data are listed in Table 12.


VII.A.3 This data indicates that both the commercial control and uncoated internal control have identical vacuum loss rates, and surprisingly, incorporation of a SiOx coating on the PET interior walls improves vacuum retention time by a factor of 2.1.


Example 10
Lubricity Layers

VII.B.1.a. The following materials were used in this test:

    • Commercial (BD Hypak® PRTC) glass prefillable syringes with Luer-lok® tip) (ca 1 mL)
    • COC syringe barrels made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel;
    • Commercial plastic syringe plungers with elastomeric tips taken from Becton Dickinson Product No. 306507 (obtained as saline prefilled syringes);
    • Normal saline solution (taken from the Becton-Dickinson Product No. 306507 prefilled syringes);
    • Dillon Test Stand with an Advanced Force Gauge (Model AFG-50N)
    • Syringe holder and drain jig (fabricated to fit the Dillon Test Stand)


VII.B.1.a. The following procedure was used in this test.


VII.B.1.a. The jig was installed on the Dillon Test Stand. The platform probe movement was adjusted to 6 in/min (2.5 mm/sec) and upper and lower stop locations were set. The stop locations were verified using an empty syringe and barrel. The commercial saline-filled syringes were labeled, the plungers were removed, and the saline solution was drained via the open ends of the syringe barrels for re-use. Extra plungers were obtained in the same manner for use with the COC and glass barrels.


VII.B.1.a. Syringe plungers were inserted into the COC syringe barrels so that the second horizontal molding point of each plunger was even with the syringe barrel lip (about 10 mm from the tip end). Using another syringe and needle assembly, the test syringes were filled via the capillary end with 2-3 milliliters of saline solution, with the capillary end uppermost. The sides of the syringe were tapped to remove any large air bubbles at the plunger/fluid interface and along the walls, and any air bubbles were carefully pushed out of the syringe while maintaining the plunger in its vertical orientation.


VII.B.1.a. Each filled syringe barrel/plunger assembly was installed into the syringe jig. The test was initiated by pressing the down switch on the test stand to advance the moving metal hammer toward the plunger. When the moving metal hammer was within 5 mm of contacting the top of the plunger, the data button on the Dillon module was repeatedly tapped to record the force at the time of each data button depression, from before initial contact with the syringe plunger until the plunger was stopped by contact with the front wall of the syringe barrel.


VII.B.1.a. All benchmark and coated syringe barrels were run with five replicates (using a new plunger and barrel for each replicate).


VII.B.1.a. COC syringe barrels made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel were coated with an OMCTS lubricity layer according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer, assembled and filled with saline, and tested as described above in this Example for lubricity layers. The polypropylene chamber used per the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer allowed the OMCTS vapor (and oxygen, if added—see Table 13) to flow through the syringe barrel and through the syringe capillary into the polypropylene chamber (although a lubricity layer is not needed in the capillary section of the syringe in this instance). Several different coating conditions were tested, as shown in previously mentioned Table 13. All of the depositions were completed on COC syringe barrels from the same production batch.


The coated samples were then tested using the plunger sliding force test per the protocol of this Example, yielding the results in Table 13, in English and metric force units. The data shows clearly that low power and no oxygen provided the lowest plunger sliding force for COC and coated COC syringes. Note that when oxygen was added at lower power (6 W) (the lower power being a favorable condition) the plunger sliding force increased from 1.09 lb, 0.49 Kg (at Power=11 W) to 2.27 lb., 1.03 Kg. This indicates that the addition of oxygen can be undesirable in certain circumstances to achieve the lowest possible plunger sliding force.


VII.B.1.a. Note also that the best plunger sliding force (Power=11 W, plunger sliding force=1.09 lb, 0.49 Kg) was very near the current industry standard of silicone coated glass (plunger sliding force=0.58 lb, 0.26 Kg), while avoiding the problems of a glass syringe such as breakability and a more expensive manufacturing process. With additional optimization, values equal to or better than the current glass with silicone performance are expected to be achieved.


VII.B.1.a. The samples were created by coating COC syringe barrels according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer. An alternative embodiment of the technology herein, would apply the lubricity layer over another thin film coating, such as SiOx, for example applied according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe barrel Interior with SiOx.


Example 11
Improved Syringe Barrel Lubricity layer

VII.B.1.a. The force required to expel a 0.9 percent saline payload from a syringe through a capillary opening using a plastic plunger was determined for inner wall-coated syringes.


VII.B.1.a. Three types of COC syringe barrels made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel were tested: one type having no internal coating [Uncoated Control], another type with a hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO)-based plasma coated internal wall coating [HMDSO Control] according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with HMDSO Coating, and a third type with an octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane [OMCTS-Inventive Example]-based plasma coated internal wall coating applied according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer. Fresh plastic plungers with elastomeric tips taken from BD Product Becton-Dickinson Product No. 306507 were used for all examples. Saline from Product No. 306507 was also used.


VII.B.1.a. The plasma coating method and apparatus for coating the syringe barrel inner walls is described in other experimental sections of this application. The specific coating parameters for the HMDSO-based and OMCTS-based coatings are listed in the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with HMDSO Coating, the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer, and Table 14.


VII.B.1.a. The plunger is inserted into the syringe barrel to about 10 millimeters, followed by vertical filling of the experimental syringe through the open syringe capillary with a separate saline-filled syringe/needle system. When the experimental syringe has been filled into the capillary opening, the syringe is tapped to permit any air bubbles adhering to the inner walls to release and rise through the capillary opening.


VII.B.1.a. The filled experimental syringe barrel/plunger assembly is placed vertically into a home-made hollow metal jig, the syringe assembly being supported on the jig at the finger flanges. The jig has a drain tube at the base and is mounted on Dillon Test Stand with Advanced Force Gauge (Model AFG-50N). The test stand has a metal hammer, moving vertically downward at a rate of six inches (152 millimeters) per minute. The metal hammer contacts the extended plunger expelling the saline solution through the capillary. Once the plunger has contacted the syringe barrel/capillary interface the experiment is stopped.


VII.B.1.a. During downward movement of the metal hammer/extended plunger, resistance force imparted on the hammer as measured on the Force Gauge is recorded on an electronic spreadsheet. From the spreadsheet data, the maximum force for each experiment is identified.


VII.B.1.a. Table 14 lists for each Example the Maximum Force average from replicate coated COC syringe barrels and the Normalized Maximum Force as determined by division of the coated syringe barrel Maximum Force average by the uncoated Maximum Force average.


VII.B.1.a. The data indicates all OMCTS-based inner wall plasma coated COC syringe barrels (Inventive Examples C, E, F, G, H) demonstrate much lower plunger sliding force than uncoated COC syringe barrels (uncoated Control Examples A & D) and surprisingly, also much lower plunger sliding force than HMDSO-based inner wall plasma coated COC syringe barrels (HMDSO control Example B). More surprising, an OMCTS-based coating over a silicon oxide (SiOx) gas barrier coating maintains excellent low plunger sliding force (Inventive Example F). The best plunger sliding force was Example C (Power=8, plunger sliding force=1.1 lb, 0.5 Kg). It was very near the current industry standard of silicone coated glass (plunger sliding force=0.58 lb., 0.26 Kg.), while avoiding the problems of a glass syringe such as breakability and a more expensive manufacturing process. With additional optimization, values equal to or better than the current glass with silicone performance are expected to be achieved.


Example 12
Fabrication of COC Syringe Barrel with Exterior Coating—Prophetic Example

VII.B.1.c. A COC syringe barrel formed according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel is sealed at both ends with disposable closures. The capped COC syringe barrel is passed through a bath of Daran® 8100 Saran Latex (Owensboro Specialty Plastics). This latex contains five percent isopropyl alcohol to reduce the contact surface tension of the composition to 32 dynes/cm). The latex composition completely wets the exterior of the COC syringe barrel. After draining for 30 seconds, the coated COC syringe barrel is exposed to a heating schedule comprising 275° F. (135° C.) for 25 seconds (latex coalescence) and 122° F. (50° C.) for four hours (finish cure) in respective forced air ovens. The resulting PVdC film is 1/10 mil (2.5 microns) thick. The COC syringe barrel and PVdC-COC laminate COC syringe barrel are measured for OTR and WVTR using a MOCON brand Oxtran 2/21 Oxygen Permeability Instrument and Permatran-W 3/31 Water Vapor Permeability Instrument, respectively.


VII.B.1.c. Predicted OTR and WVTR values are listed in Table 15, which shows the expected Barrier Improvement Factor (BIF) for the laminate would be 4.3 (OTR-BIF) and 3.0 (WVTR-BIF), respectively.


Example 13
Atomic Compositions of PECVD Applied OMCTS and HMDSO Coatings

VII.B.4. COC syringe barrel samples made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel, coated with OMCTS (according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer) or coated with HMDSO according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with HMDSO Coating were provided. The atomic compositions of the coatings derived from OMCTS or HMDSO were characterized using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS).


VII.B.4. XPS data is quantified using relative sensitivity factors and a model that assumes a homogeneous layer. The analysis volume is the product of the analysis area (spot size or aperture size) and the depth of information. Photoelectrons are generated within the X-ray penetration depth (typically many microns), but only the photoelectrons within the top three photoelectron escape depths are detected. Escape depths are on the order of 15-35 Å, which leads to an analysis depth of ˜50-100 Å. Typically, 95% of the signal originates from within this depth.


VII.B.4. The following analytical parameters were used:

    • Instrument: PHI Quantum 2000
    • x-ray source: Monochromated Alka 1486.6 eV
    • Acceptance Angle +23°
    • Take-off angle 45°
    • Analysis area 600 μm
    • Charge Correction C1s 284.8 eV
    • Ion Gun Conditions Ar+, 1 keV, 2×2 mm raster
    • Sputter Rate 15.6 Å/min (SiO2 Equivalent)


VII.B.4. Table 17 provides the atomic concentrations of the elements detected. XPS does not detect hydrogen or helium. Values given are normalized to 100 percent using the elements detected. Detection limits are approximately 0.05 to 1.0 atomic percent.


VII.B.4. From the coating composition results and calculated starting monomer precursor elemental percent in Table 17, while the carbon atom percent of the HMDSO-based coating is decreased relative to starting HMDSO monomer carbon atom percent (54.1% down to 44.4%), surprisingly the OMCTS-based coating carbon atom percent is increased relative to the OMCTS monomer carbon atom percent (34.8% up to 48.4%), an increase of 39 atomic %, calculated as follows:

100% [(48.4/34.8)−1]=39 at. %.


Also, while the silicon atom percent of the HMDSO-based coating is almost unchanged relative to starting HMDSO monomer silicon atom percent (21.8% to 22.2%), surprisingly the OMCTS-based coating silicon atom percent is significantly decreased relative to the OMCTS monomer silicon atom percent (42.0% down to 23.6%), a decrease of 44 atomic %. With both the carbon and silicon changes, the OMCTS monomer to coating behavior does not trend with that observed in common precursor monomers (e.g. HMDSO). See, e.g., Hans J. Griesser, Ronald C. Chatelier, Chris Martin, Zoran R. Vasic, Thomas R. Gengenbach, George Jessup J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl Biomater) 53: 235-243, 2000.


Example 14
Volatile Components from Plasma Coatings (“Outgassing”)

VII.B.4. COC syringe barrel samples made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel, coated with OMCTS (according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer) or with HMDSO (according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with HMDSO Coating) were provided. Outgassing gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) analysis was used to measure the volatile components released from the OMCTS or HMDSO coatings.


VII.B.4. The syringe barrel samples (four COC syringe barrels cut in half lengthwise) were placed in one of the 1½″ (37 mm) diameter chambers of a dynamic headspace sampling system (CDS 8400 auto-sampler). Prior to sample analysis, a system blank was analyzed. The sample was analyzed on an Agilent 7890A Gas Chromatograph/Agilent 5975 Mass Spectrometer, using the following parameters, producing the data set out in Table 18:

    • GC Column: 30 m×0.25 mm DB-5MS (J&W Scientific), 0.25 μm film thickness
    • Flow rate: 1.0 ml/min, constant flow mode
    • Detector: Mass Selective Detector (MSD)
    • Injection Mode: Split injection (10:1 split ratio)
    • Outgassing Conditions: 1½″ (37 mm) Chamber, purge for three hour at 85° C., flow 60 ml/min
    • Oven temperature: 40° C. (5 min.) to 300° C. @10° C./min.; hold for 5 min. at 300° C.


The outgassing results from Table 18 clearly indicated a compositional differentiation between the HMDSO-based and OMCTS-based lubricity layers tested. HMDSO-based compositions outgassed trimethylsilanol [(Me)3SiOH] but outgassed no measured higher oligomers containing repeating -(Me)2SiO— moieties, while OMCTS-based compositions outgassed no measured trimethylsilanol [(Me)3SiOH] but outgassed higher oligomers containing repeating -(Me)2SiO— moieties. It is contemplated that this test can be useful for differentiating HMDSO-based coatings from OMCTS-based coatings.


Without limiting the invention according to the scope or accuracy of the following theory, it is contemplated that this result can be explained by considering the cyclic structure of OMCTS, with only two methyl groups bonded to each silicon atom, versus the acyclic structure of HMDSO, in which each silicon atom is bonded to three methyl groups. OMCTS is contemplated to react by ring opening to form a diradical having repeating -(Me)2SiO— moieties which are already oligomers, and can condense to form higher oligomers. HMDSO, on the other hand, is contemplated to react by cleaving at one O—Si bond, leaving one fragment containing a single O—Si bond that recondenses as (Me)3SiOH and the other fragment containing no O—Si bond that recondenses as [(Me)3Si]2.


The cyclic nature of OMCTS is believed to result in ring opening and condensation of these ring-opened moieties with outgassing of higher MW oligomers (26 ng/test). In contrast, HMDSO-based coatings are believed not to provide any higher oligomers, based on the relatively low-molecular-weight fragments from HMDSO.


Example 15
Density Determination of Plasma Coatings Using X-Ray Reflectivity (XRR)

VII. B. 4. Sapphire witness samples (0.5×0.5×0.1 cm) were glued to the inner walls of separate PET tubes, made according to the Protocol for Forming PET tubes. The sapphire witness-containing PET tubes were coated with OMCTS or HMDSO (both according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer, deviating all with 2× power). The coated sapphire samples were then removed and X-ray reflectivity (XRR) data were acquired on a PANalytical X'Pert diffractometer equipped with a parabolic multilayer incident beam monochromator and a parallel plate diffracted beam collimator. A two layer SiwOxCyHz model was used to determine coating density from the critical angle measurement results. This model is contemplated to offer the best approach to isolate the true SiwOxCyHz coating. The results are shown in Table 19.


VII. B. 4. From Table 17 showing the results of Example 13, the lower oxygen (28%) and higher carbon (48.4%) composition of OMCTS versus HMDSO would suggest OMCTS should have a lower density, due to both atomic mass considerations and valency (oxygen=2; carbon=4). Surprisingly, the XRR density results indicate the opposite would be observed, that is, the OMCTS density is higher than HMDSO density.


VII. B. 4. Without limiting the invention according to the scope or accuracy of the following theory, it is contemplated that there is a fundamental difference in reaction mechanism in the formation of the respective HMDSO-based and OMCTS-based coatings. HMDSO fragments can more easily nucleate or react to form dense nanoparticles which then deposit on the contact surface and react further on the contact surface, whereas OMCTS is much less likely to form dense gas phase nanoparticles. OMCTS reactive species are much more likely to condense on the contact surface in a form much more similar to the original OMCTS monomer, resulting in an overall less dense coating.


Example 16
Thickness Uniformity of PECVD Applied Coatings

VII. B. 4. Samples were provided of COC syringe barrels made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe barrel and respectively coated with SiOx according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with SiOx or an OMCTS-based lubricity layer according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer. Samples were also provided of PET tubes made according to the Protocol for Forming PET Tube, respectively coated and uncoated with SiOx according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx and subjected to an accelerated aging test. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to measure the thickness of the PECVD-applied coatings on the samples. The previously stated TEM procedure of Example 4 was used. The method and apparatus described by the SiOx and lubricity layer protocols used in this example demonstrated uniform coating as shown in Table 20.


Example 17
Outgassing Measurement on COC

VI.B. COC tubes were made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Tube. Some of the tubes were provided with an interior barrier coating of SiOx according to the Protocol for Coating Tube Interior with SiOx, and other COC tubes were uncoated. Commercial glass blood collection Becton Dickinson 13×75 mm tubes having similar dimensions were also provided as above. The tubes were stored for about 15 minutes in a room containing ambient air at 45% relative humidity and 70° F. (21° C.), and the following testing was done at the same ambient relative humidity. The tubes were tested for outgassing following the ATC microflow measurement procedure and equipment of Example 8 (an Intelligent Gas Leak System with Leak Test Instrument Model ME2, with second generation IMFS sensor, (10μ/min full range), Absolute Pressure Sensor range: 0-10 Torr, Flow measurement uncertainty: +/−5% of reading, at calibrated range, employing the Leak-Tek Program for automatic data acquisition (with PC) and signatures/plots of leak flow vs. time). In the present case each tube was subjected to a 22-second bulk moisture degassing step at a pressure of 1 mm Hg, was pressurized with nitrogen gas for 2 seconds (to 760 millimeters Hg), then the nitrogen gas was pumped down and the microflow measurement step was carried out for about one minute at 1 millimeter Hg pressure.


Again, the outgassing measurement began at about 4 seconds, and a few seconds later the plots for the uncoated COC tubes and the plots for the SiOx barrier coated tubes clearly diverged, again demonstrating rapid differentiation between barrier coated tubes and uncoated tubes. A consistent separation of uncoated COC (>2 micrograms at 60 seconds) versus SiOx-coated COC (less than 1.6 micrograms at 60 seconds) was realized.


Example 18
Lubricity Layers

VII.B.1.a. COC syringe barrels made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe Barrel were coated with a lubricity layer according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer. The results are provided in Table 21. The results show that the trend of increasing the power level, in the absence of oxygen, from 8 to 14 Watts was to improve the lubricity of the coating. Further experiments with power and flow rates can provide further enhancement of lubricity.


Example 19
Lubricity Layers—Hypothetical Example

VII. B. 4. Injection molded cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) plastic syringe barrels are made according to the Protocol for Forming COC Syringe Barrel. Some are uncoated (“control”) and others are PECVD lubricity coated according to the Protocol for Coating COC Syringe Barrel Interior with OMCTS Lubricity layer (“lubricated syringe”). The lubricated syringes and controls are tested to measure the force to initiate movement of the plunger in the barrel (breakout force) and the force to maintain movement of the plunger in the barrel (plunger sliding force) using a Genesis Packaging Automated Syringe Force Tester, Model AST.


VII. B. 4. The test is a modified version of the ISO 7886-1:1993 test. The following procedure is used for each test. A fresh plastic plunger with elastomeric tip taken from Becton Dickinson Product No. 306507 (obtained as saline prefilled syringes) is removed from the syringe assembly. The elastomeric tip is dried with clean dry compressed air. The elastomeric tip and plastic plunger are then inserted into the COC plastic syringe barrel to be tested with the plunger positioned even with the bottom of the syringe barrel. The filled syringes are then conditioned as necessary to achieve the state to be tested. For example, if the test object is to find out the effect of lubricant coating on the breakout force of syringes after storing the syringes for three months, the syringes are stored for three months to achieve the desired state.


VII. B. 4. The syringe is installed into a Genesis Packaging Automated Syringe Force Tester. The tester is calibrated at the start of the test per the manufacturer's specification. The tester input variables are Speed=100 mm/minute, Range=10,000. The start button is pushed on the tester. At completion of the test, the breakout force (to initiate movement of the plunger in the barrel) and the plunger sliding force (to maintain movement) are measured, and are found to be substantially lower for the lubricated syringes than for the control syringes.


While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive; the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art and practising the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.









TABLE 1







COATED COC TUBE OTR AND WVTR MEASUREMENT




















OTR
WVTR





O—Si
O2

(cc/
(mg/


Coating
Power

Flow
Flow
Time
Tube.
Tube.


ID
(Watts)
O—Si
(sccm)
(sccm)
(sec)
Day)
Day)

















No





0.215
0.27


Coating


A
50
HMDSO
6
90
14
0.023
0.07


B
50
HMDSO
6
90
14
0.024
0.10


C
50
HMDSO
6
90
7
0.026
0.10
















TABLE 2







COATED PET TUBE OTR AND WVTR MEASUREMENT






















OTR
WVTR







O—Si
O2

(cc/
(mg/


Coating
Power

Flow
Flow
Time
Tube.
Tube.
BIF
BIF


ID
(Watts)
O—Si
(sccm)
(sccm)
(sec)
Day)
Day)
(OTR)
(WVTR)





Uncoated





0.0078
3.65




Control


SiOx
50
HMDSO
6
90
3
0.0035
1.95
2.2
1.9
















TABLE 2A







COATED PET TUBE OTR WITH MECHANICAL SCRATCH DEFECTS





















Mechanical







O—Si
O2
Treat
Scratch
OTR




Power
Flow
Flow
Time
Length
(cc/tube.


Example
O—Si
(Watts)
(sccm)
(sccm)
(sec)
(mm)
day)*
OTR BIF


















Uncoated






0.0052



Control


Inventive
HMDSO
50
6
90
3
0
0.0014
3.7


Inventive
HMDSO
50
6
90
3
1
0.0039
1.3


Inventive
HMDSO
50
6
90
3
2
0.0041
1.3


Inventive
HMDSO
50
6
90
3
10
0.0040
1.3


Inventive
HMDSO
50
6
90
3
20
0.0037
1.4





*average of two tubes













TABLE 3







COATED COC SYRINGE BARREL OTR AND WVTR MEASUREMENT





















O—Si
O2

OTR
WVTR








Flow
Flow
Coating
(cc/
(mg/



Syringe
O—Si
Power
Rate
Rate
Time
Barrel.
Barrel.
BIF
BIF


Example
Coating
Composition
(Watts)
(sccm)
(sccm)
(sec)
Day)
Day)
(OTR)
(WVTR)




















A
Uncoated





0.032
0.12





Control


B
SiOx
HMDSO
44
6
90
7
0.025
0.11
1.3
1.1



Inventive



Example


C
SiOx
HMDSO
44
6
105
7
0.021
0.11
1.5
1.1



Inventive



Example


D
SiOx
HMDSO
50
6
90
7
0.026
0.10
1.2
1.2



Inventive



Example


E
SiOx
HMDSO
50
6
90
14
0.024
0.07
1.3
1.7



Inventive



Example


F
SiOx
HMDSO
52
6
97.5
7
0.022
0.12
1.5
1.0



Inventive



Example


G
SiOx
HMDSO
61
6
105
7
0.022
0.11
1.4
1.1



Inventive



Example


H
SiOx
HMDSO
61
6
120
7
0.024
0.10
1.3
1.2



Inventive



Example


I
SiOx
HMDZ
44
6
90
7
0.022
0.10
1.5
1.3



Inventive



Example


J
SiOx
HMDZ
61
6
90
7
0.022
0.10
1.5
1.2



Inventive



Example


K
SiOx
HMDZ
61
6
105
7
0.019
0.10
1.7
1.2



Inventive



Example
















TABLE 4







SiOx COATING THICKNESS (NANOMETERS)


DETECTED BY TEM

















Oxygen






HMDSO
Flow




Thickness
Power
Flow Rate
Rate


Sample
O—Si
(nm)
(Watts)
(sccm)
(sccm)





Inventive
HMDSO
25-50
39
6
60


Example A







Inventive
HMDSO
20-35
39
6
90


Example B
















TABLE 5







ATOMIC RATIOS OF THE ELEMENTS DETECTED (in


parentheses, Concentrations in percent,


normalized to 100% of elements detected)












Plasma





Sample
Coating
Si
O
C





PET Tube -

0.08 (4.6%)
1 (31.5%)
2.7 (63.9%)


Comparative






Example






Polyethylene


1 (28.6%)
2.5 (71.4%)


Terephthal-






ate -






Calculated






Coated PET
SiOx
   1 (39.1%)
2.4 (51.7%)  
0.57 (9.2%) 


Tube -






Inventive






Example
















TABLE 6







EXTENT OF HOLLOW CATHODE PLASMA IGNITION














Hollow Cathode Plasma
Staining


Sample
Power
Time
Ignition
Result





A
25 Watts
7 sec
No Ignition in gas inlet 310,
good





Ignition in restricted area 292



B
25 Watts
7 sec
Ignition in gas inlet 310 and
poor





restricted area 292



C
 8 Watts
9 sec
No Ignition in gas inlet 310,
better





Ignition in restricted area 292



D
30 Watts
5 sec
No Ignition in gas inlet 310 or
best





restricted area 292
















TABLE 7







FLOW RATE USING GLASS TUBES












Glass
Run #1
Run #2
Average



Tube
(μg/min.)
(μg/min.)
(μg/min.)















1
1.391
1.453
1.422



2
1.437
1.243
1.34



3
1.468
1.151
1.3095



4
1.473
1.019
1.246



5
1.408
0.994
1.201



6
1.328
0.981
1.1545



7
Broken
Broken
Broken



8
1.347
0.909
1.128



9
1.171
0.91
1.0405



10
1.321
0.946
1.1335



11
1.15
0.947
1.0485



12
1.36
1.012
1.186



13
1.379
0.932
1.1555



14
1.311
0.893
1.102



15
1.264
0.928
1.096



Average
1.343
1.023
1.183



Max
1.473
1.453
1.422



Min
1.15
0.893
1.0405



Max − Min
0.323
0.56
0.3815



Std Dev
0.097781
0.157895
0.1115087
















TABLE 8







FLOW RATE USING PET TUBES












Uncoated
Run #1
Run #2
Average



PET
(μg/min.)
(μg/min.)
(μg/min.)















1
10.36
10.72
10.54



2
11.28
11.1
11.19



3
11.43
11.22
11.325



4
11.41
11.13
11.27



5
11.45
11.17
11.31



6
11.37
11.26
11.315



7
11.36
11.33
11.345



8
11.23
11.24
11.235



9
11.14
11.23
11.185



10
11.1
11.14
11.12



11
11.16
11.25
11.205



12
11.21
11.31
11.26



13
11.28
11.22
11.25



14
10.99
11.19
11.09



15
11.3
11.24
11.27



Average
11.205
11.183
11.194



Max
11.45
11.33
11.345



Min
10.36
10.72
10.54



Max − Min
1.09
0.61
0.805



Std Dev
0.267578
0.142862
0.195121
















TABLE 9







FLOW RATE FOR SiOx COATED PET TUBES












Coated
Run #1
Run #2
Average



PET
(μg/min.)
(μg/min.)
(μg/min.)















1
6.834
6.655
6.7445



2
9.682
9.513
Outliers



3
7.155
7.282
7.2185



4
8.846
8.777
Outliers



5
6.985
6.983
6.984



6
7.106
7.296
7.201



7
6.543
6.665
6.604



8
7.715
7.772
7.7435



9
6.848
6.863
6.8555



10
7.205
7.322
7.2635



11
7.61
7.608
7.609



12
7.67
7.527
7.5985



13
7.715
7.673
7.694



14
7.144
7.069
7.1065



15
7.33
7.24
7.285



Average
7.220
7.227
7.224



Max
7.715
7.772
7.7435



Min
6.543
6.655
6.604



Max − Min
1.172
1.117
1.1395



Std Dev
0.374267
0.366072
0.365902
















TABLE 10







WETTING TENSION MEASUREMENT


OF COATED AND UNCOATED TUBES











Wetting Tension


Example
Tube Coating
(dyne/cm)





Reference
uncoated glass
72


Inventive Example
PET tube coated with
60



SiOx according to SiOx




Protocol



Comparative Example
uncoated PET
40


Inventive Example
PET tube coated
34



according to




Hydrophobic layer




Protocol



Comparative Example
Glass (+silicone fluid)
30



glass syringe, Part No.
















TABLE 11







WATER MASS DRAW (GRAMS)









Pressurization



Time (days)















Tube
0
27
46
81
108
125
152
231





BD PET
3.0



1.9

1.0



(commercial control)


Uncoated PET
4.0

3.1


2.7


(internal control)


SiOx-Coated PET
4.0

3.6


3.3


(inventive example)
















TABLE 12







CALCULATED NORMALIZED AVERAGE VACUUM DECAY


RATE AND TIME TO 10% VACUUM LOSS










Normalized Average




Decay rate (delta
Time to 10% Loss


Tube
mL/initial mL · da)
(months) - Accelerated





BD PET
0.0038
0.9


(commercial control)




Uncoated PET
0.0038
0.9


(internal control)




SiOx-Coated PET
0.0018
1.9


(inventive example)






















TABLE 13







O—Si
O2

Avg.




Power,
Flow,
Flow,
time
Force,


Sample
(Watts)
(sccm)
(sccm)
(sec)
(lb.)
St. dev.















SYRINGE BARRELS WITH LUBRICITY LAYER,


ENGLISH UNITS













Glass with
No
No
No
No
0.58
0.03


Silicone
coating
coating
coating
coating


Uncoated COC
No
No
No
No
3.04
0.71



coating
coating
coating
coating


A
11
6
0
7
1.09
0.27


B
17
6
0
14
2.86
0.59


C
33
6
0
14
3.87
0.34


D
6
6
90
30
2.27
0.49


Uncoated COC




3.9
0.6


SiOx on COC




4.0
1.2


E
11
1.25
0
5
2.0
0.5


F
11
2.5
0
5
2.1
0.7


G
11
5
0
5
2.6
0.6


H
11
2.5
0
10
1.4
0.1


I
22
5
0
5
3.1
0.7


J
22
2.5
0
10
3.3
1.4


K
22
5
0
5
3.1
0.4







SYRINGE BARRELS WITH LUBRICITY LAYER, METRIC UNITS













Glass syringe
No
No
No
No
0.26
0.01


with sprayed
coating
coating
coating
coating


silicone


Uncoated COC
No
No
No
No
1.38
0.32



coating
coating
coating
coating


A
11
6
0
7
0.49
0.12


B
17
6
0
14
1.29
0.27


C
33
6
0
14
1.75
0.15


D
6
6
90
30
1.03
0.22


Uncoated COC




1.77
0.27


SiOx on COC,




1.81
0.54


per protocol


E
11
1.25

5
0.91
0.23


F
11
2.5

5
0.95
0.32


G
11
5

5
1.18
0.27


H
11
2.5

10
0.63
0.05


I
22
5

5
1.40
0.32


J
22
2.5

10
1.49
0.63


K
22
5

5
1.40
0.18
















TABLE 14







PLUNGER SLIDING FORCE MEASUREMENTS OF HMDSO- AND


OMCTS-BASED PLASMA COATINGS


















Coating








Coating
Si-0
Coating
Maximum
Normalized





Time
Flow Rate
Power
Force
Maximum


Example
Description
Monomer
(sec)
(sccm)
(Watts)
(lb, kg.)
Force

















A
uncoated




3.3, 1.5
1.0



Control


B
HMDSO
HMDSO
7
6
8
4.1, 1.9
1.2



Coating


C
OMCTS
OMCTS
7
6
8
1.1, 0.5
0.3



Lubricity layer


D
uncoated




3.9, 1.8
1.0



Control


E
OMCTS
OMCTS
7
6
11
2.0, 0.9
0.5



Lubricity layer


F
Two Layer
1 COC
14
6
50



Coating
Syringe




Barrel +




SiOx




2 OMCTS
7
6
8
2.5, 1.1
0.6




Lubricity




layer


G
OMCTS
OMCTS
5
1.25
11
  2, 0.9
0.5



Lubricity layer


H
OMCTS
OMCTS
10
1.25
11
1.4, 0.6
0.4



Lubricity layer
















TABLE 15







OTR AND WVTR MEASUREMENTS (Prophetic)










OTR
WVTR



(cc/barrel ·
(gram/barrel ·


Sample
day)
day)





COC syringe- Comparative Example
4.3 X
3.0 Y


PVdC-COC laminate COC syringe-
X
Y


Inventive Example
















TABLE 16







OPTICAL ABSORPTION OF SiOx COATED PET


TUBES (NORMALIZED TO UNCOATED PET TUBE)













Average





Coating
Absorption (@




Sample
Time
615 nm)
Replicates
St. dev.














Reference (uncoated)

0.002-0.014
4



Inventive A
  3 sec
0.021
8
0.001


Inventive B
2 × 3 sec
0.027
10
0.002


Inventive C
3 × 3 sec
0.033
4
0.003
















TABLE 17







ATOMIC CONCENTRATIONS (IN PERCENT, NORMALIZED


TO 100% OF ELEMENTS DETECTED) AND TEM THICKNESS












Plasma





Sample
Coating
Si
O
C





HMDSO-based
SiwOxCy
0.76 (22.2%)
1 (33.4%)
3.7 (44.4%)


Coated COC






syringe barrel






OMCTS- based
SiwOxCy
0.46 (23.6%)
1 (28%)  
4.0 (48.4%)


Coated COC






syringe barrel






HMDSO Monomer-
Si2OC6
  2 (21.8%)
1 (24.1%)
  6 (54.1%)


calculated






OMCTS Monomer-
Si4O4C8
 1 (42%)
1 (23.2%)
  2 (34.8%)


calculated
















TABLE 18







VOLATILE COMPONENTS FROM SYRINGE OUTGASSING











Coating
Me3SiOH
Higher SiOMe



Monomer
(ng/test)
oligomers (ng/test)





Uncoated COC syringe -
Uncoated
ND
ND


Comparative Example





HMDSO-based Coated
HMDSO
58
ND


COC syringe-





Comparative Example





OMCTS- based Coated
OMCTS
ND
26


COC syringe- Inventive





Example
















TABLE 19







PLASMA COATING DENSITY FROM XRR DETERMINATION













Density



Sample
Layer
g/cm3






HMDSO-based Coated Sapphire -
SiwOxCyHz
1.21



Comparative Example





OMCTS- based Coated Sapphire -
SiwOxCyHz
1.46



Inventive Example
















TABLE 20







THICKNESS OF PECVD COATINGS BY TEM













TEM



TEM
TEM
Thickness


Sample ID
Thickness I
Thickness II
III





Protocol for Forming
164 nm 
154 nm 
167 nm 


COC Syringe Barrel;





Protocol for Coating





COC Syringe Barrel





Interior with SiOx





Protocol for Forming
55 nm
48 nm
52 nm


COC Syringe Barrel;





Protocol for Coating





COC Syringe Barrel





Interior with OMCTS





Lubricity layer





Protocol for
28 nm
26 nm
30 nm


Forming PET Tube;





Protocol for Coating





Tube Interior with SiOx





Protocol for





Forming PET Tube





(uncoated)
















TABLE 21







OMCTS LUBRICITY LAYER PERFORMANCE (English Units)












Average
Percent





Plunger
Force

OMCTS



Force
Reduction
Power
Flow


Sample
(lbs.)*
(vs uncoated)
(Watts)
(sccm)










(English Units)











Comparative
3.99





(no coating)






Sample A
1.46
63%
14
0.75


Sample B
1.79
55%
11
1.25


Sample C
2.09
48%
8
1.75


Sample D
2.13
47%
14
1.75


Sample E
2.13
47%
11
1.25


Sample F
2.99
25%
8
0.75







(Metric Units)











Comparative
1.81





(no coating)






Sample A
0.66
63%
14
0.75


Sample B
0.81
55%
11
1.25


Sample C
0.95
48%
8
1.75


Sample D
0.96
47%
14
1.75


Sample E
0.96
47%
11
1.25


Sample F
1.35
25%
8
0.75





*Average of 4 replicates







Above force measurements are the average of 4 samples.

Claims
  • 1. A catheter comprising a substrate defining a contact surface for contact between the substrate and a fluid or tissue; anda lubricity layer deposited on the contact surface and configured to provide a lower sliding force or breakout force for the contact surface than for the uncoated substrate; the lubricity layer having one of the following atomic ratios, measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), SiwOxCy or SiwNxCy, where w is 1, x in this formula is from about 0.5 to 2.4, and y is from about 0.6 to about 3;the lubricity layer having a thickness by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) between 10 and 1000 nm;the lubricity layer deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) under conditions effective to form a coating from a precursor selected from a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, a silatrane, a silquasilatrane, a silproatrane, an azasilatrane, an azasilquasiatrane, an azasilproatrane, or a combination of any two or more of these precursors.
  • 2. The catheter of claim 1, in which the precursor is selected from a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, a monocyclic sila-zane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, a silatrane, a silquasilatrane, a silproatrane, an azasilatrane, an azasilquasiatrane, an azasilproatrane, or a combination of any two or more of these precursors.
  • 3. The catheter of claim 1, in which the precursor comprises hexamethyldisiloxane, octamethyltrisiloxane, decamethyltetrasiloxane, hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane, a poly(methylsil-sesquioxane) according to the T8 cube formula:
  • 4. The catheter of claim 1, in which the precursor comprises octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS).
  • 5. The catheter of claim 1, in which the precursor consists essentially of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS).
  • 6. A catheter comprising a substrate defining a contact surface for contact between the substrate and a fluid or tissue; anda barrier layer deposited on the contact surface and configured to reduce the transmission of a fluid to or from the contact surface;the barrier layer having one of the following atomic ratios, measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), SiOx or SiNx, where x is from about 0.5 to 2.4;the barrier layer having a thickness by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) between 1 and 1000 nm;the barrier layer deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) under conditions effective to form a coating from a precursor selected from a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, a silatrane, a silquasilatrane, a silproatrane, an azasilatrane, an azasilquasiatrane, an azasilproatrane, or a combination of any two or more of these precursors.
  • 7. A catheter comprising a substrate defining a contact surface for contact between the substrate and a fluid or tissue; the contact surface having a hydrophobic layer having the composition: SiOxCy or SiNxCy, where x in this formula is from about 0.5 to 2.4 and y is from about 1.6 to about 3, of the type made by: providing a precursor selected from a linear siloxane, a monocyclic siloxane, a polycyclic siloxane, a polysilsesquioxane, an alkyl trimethoxysilane, a linear silazane, a monocyclic silazane, a polycyclic silazane, a polysilsesquiazane, or a combination of any two or more of these precursors;applying the precursor to a contact surface under conditions effective to form a coating; andpolymerizing or crosslinking the coating, or both, to form a hydrophobic contact surface having a higher contact angle than the untreated contact surface.
  • 8. The catheter of claim 7, in which the precursor comprises hexamethyldisiloxane, octamethyltrisiloxane, decamethyltetrasiloxane, hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, decamethylcyclopenta-siloxane, dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane, a silatrane, a silquasilatrane, a silproatrane, an azasilatrane, an azasilquasiatrane, an azasilproatrane, SST-eM01 poly(methylsilsesquioxane), in which each R is methyl, SST-3MH1.1 poly(Methyl-Hydridosilsesquioxane), in which 90% of the R groups are methyl and 10% are hydrogen atoms, methyl trimethoxysilane, or a combination of any two or more of these.
  • 9. The catheter of claim 7, in which the precursor comprises octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the priority of U.S. Ser. No. 61/471,056, filed Apr. 1, 2011, which is incorporated here by reference in its entirety. The following patent applications, publications, and patents are incorporated here by reference in their entirety. Application No.Filing DatePublication No.61/177,984May 13, 200961/222,727Jul. 2, 200961/213,904Jul. 24, 200961/234,505Aug. 17, 200961/261,321Nov. 14, 200961/263,275Nov. 20, 200961/263,289Nov. 20, 200961/285,813Dec. 11, 200961/298,159Jan. 25, 201061/299,888Jan. 29, 201061/318,197Mar. 26, 201061/333,625May 11, 201012/779,077May 12, 2010U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,188EP10162755.2May 12, 2010EP2253735A2EP10162760.2May 12, 2010EP2251454A2EP10162757.8May 12, 2010EP2251453A2EP10162756.0May 12, 2010EP2251452A2EP10162758.6May 12, 2010EP2251671A2EP10162761.0May 12, 2010EP2251455A2PCT/US10/34568May 12, 2010WO 2010/132579PCT/US10/34571May 12, 2010WO 2010/132581PCT/US10/34576May 12, 2010WO 2010/132584PCT/US10/34577May 12, 2010WO 2010/132585PCT/US10/34582May 12, 2010WO 2010/132589PCT/US10/34586May 12, 2010WO/2010/13259161/365,277Jul. 16, 201061/371,967Aug. 9, 201061/374,459Aug. 17, 201061/379,299Sep. 21, 201061/413,329Nov. 12, 201061/413,334Nov. 12, 201061/413,355Nov. 12, 201061/413,340Nov. 12, 201061/413,344Nov. 12, 201061/413,347Nov. 12, 201061/452,526Mar. 14, 201161/452,518Mar. 14, 2011

US Referenced Citations (928)
Number Name Date Kind
3274267 Chow Sep 1966 A
3297465 Connell Jan 1967 A
3355947 Karlby Dec 1967 A
3442686 Jones May 1969 A
3448614 Muger Jun 1969 A
3590634 Pasternak Jul 1971 A
3838598 Tompkins Oct 1974 A
3957653 Blecher May 1976 A
4111326 Percarpio Sep 1978 A
4118972 Goeppner Oct 1978 A
4134832 Heimreid Jan 1979 A
4136794 Percarpio Jan 1979 A
4162528 Maldonado Jul 1979 A
4168330 Kaganowicz Sep 1979 A
4186840 Percarpio Feb 1980 A
4187952 Percarpio Feb 1980 A
4226333 Percarpio Oct 1980 A
4289726 Potoczky Sep 1981 A
4290534 Percarpio Sep 1981 A
4293078 Percarpio Oct 1981 A
4338764 Percarpio Jul 1982 A
4391128 McWorter Jul 1983 A
4392218 Plunkett, Jr. Jul 1983 A
4422896 Class Dec 1983 A
4452679 Dunn Jun 1984 A
4478873 Masso Oct 1984 A
4481229 Suzuki Nov 1984 A
4483737 Mantei Nov 1984 A
4484479 Eckhardt Nov 1984 A
4486378 Hirata Dec 1984 A
4522510 Rosencwaig Jun 1985 A
4524616 Drexel Jun 1985 A
4552791 Hahn Nov 1985 A
4576204 Smallborn Mar 1986 A
4609428 Fujimura Sep 1986 A
4610770 Saito Sep 1986 A
4648107 Latter Mar 1987 A
4648281 Morita Mar 1987 A
4652429 Konrad Mar 1987 A
4664279 Obrist May 1987 A
4667620 White May 1987 A
4668365 Foster May 1987 A
4683838 Kimura Aug 1987 A
4697717 Grippi Oct 1987 A
4703187 Hofling Oct 1987 A
4716491 Ohno Dec 1987 A
4721553 Saito Jan 1988 A
4725481 Ostapchenko Feb 1988 A
4741446 Miller May 1988 A
4756964 Kincaid Jul 1988 A
4767414 Williams Aug 1988 A
4778721 Sliemers Oct 1988 A
4799246 Fischer Jan 1989 A
4808453 Romberg Feb 1989 A
4809876 Tomaswick Mar 1989 A
4810752 Bayan Mar 1989 A
4824444 Nomura Apr 1989 A
4841776 Kawachi Jun 1989 A
4842704 Collins Jun 1989 A
4844986 Karakelle Jul 1989 A
4846101 Montgomery Jul 1989 A
4853102 Tateishi Aug 1989 A
4869203 Pinkhasov Sep 1989 A
4872758 Miyazaki Oct 1989 A
4874497 Matsuoka Oct 1989 A
4880675 Mehta Nov 1989 A
4883686 Doehler Nov 1989 A
4886086 Etchells Dec 1989 A
4894256 Gartner Jan 1990 A
4894510 Nakanishi Jan 1990 A
4897285 Wilhelm Jan 1990 A
4926791 Hirose May 1990 A
4948628 Montgomery Aug 1990 A
4973504 Romberg Nov 1990 A
4978714 Bayan Dec 1990 A
4991104 Miller Feb 1991 A
4999014 Gold Mar 1991 A
5000994 Romberg Mar 1991 A
5009646 Sudo Apr 1991 A
5016564 Nakamura May 1991 A
5021114 Saito Jun 1991 A
5028566 Lagendijk Jul 1991 A
5030475 Ackermann Jul 1991 A
5032202 Tsai Jul 1991 A
5039548 Hirose Aug 1991 A
5041303 Wertheimer Aug 1991 A
5042951 Gold Aug 1991 A
5044199 Drexel Sep 1991 A
5064083 Alexander Nov 1991 A
5067491 Taylor Nov 1991 A
5079481 Moslehi Jan 1992 A
5082542 Moslehi Jan 1992 A
5084356 Deak Jan 1992 A
5085904 Deak Feb 1992 A
5099881 Nakajima Mar 1992 A
5113790 Geisler May 1992 A
5120966 Kondo Jun 1992 A
5131752 Yu Jul 1992 A
5144196 Gegenwart Sep 1992 A
5154943 Etzkorn Oct 1992 A
5189446 Barnes Feb 1993 A
5192849 Moslehi Mar 1993 A
5198725 Chen Mar 1993 A
5203959 Hirose Apr 1993 A
5204141 Roberts Apr 1993 A
5209882 Hattori May 1993 A
5216329 Pelleteir Jun 1993 A
5224441 Felts Jul 1993 A
5225024 Hanley Jul 1993 A
5232111 Burns Aug 1993 A
5252178 Moslehi Oct 1993 A
5260095 Affinito Nov 1993 A
5266398 Hioki Nov 1993 A
5271274 Khuri-Yakub Dec 1993 A
5272417 Ohmi Dec 1993 A
5272735 Bryan Dec 1993 A
5275299 Konrad Jan 1994 A
5286297 Moslehi Feb 1994 A
5288560 Sudo Feb 1994 A
5292370 Tsai Mar 1994 A
5294011 Konrad Mar 1994 A
5294464 Geisler Mar 1994 A
5298587 Hu Mar 1994 A
5300901 Krummel Apr 1994 A
5302266 Grabarz Apr 1994 A
5308649 Babacz May 1994 A
5314561 Komiya May 1994 A
5320875 Hu Jun 1994 A
5321634 Obata Jun 1994 A
5330578 Sakama Jul 1994 A
5333049 Ledger Jul 1994 A
5338579 Ogawa et al. Aug 1994 A
5346579 Cook Sep 1994 A
5354286 Mesa Oct 1994 A
5356029 Hogan Oct 1994 A
5361921 Burns Nov 1994 A
5364665 Felts Nov 1994 A
5364666 Williams Nov 1994 A
5372851 Ogawa et al. Dec 1994 A
5374314 Babacz Dec 1994 A
5378510 Thomas Jan 1995 A
5395644 Affinito Mar 1995 A
5396080 Hannotiau Mar 1995 A
5397956 Araki Mar 1995 A
5413813 Cruse May 1995 A
5423915 Murata Jun 1995 A
5429070 Campbell Jul 1995 A
5433786 Hu Jul 1995 A
5434008 Felts Jul 1995 A
5439736 Nomura Aug 1995 A
5440446 Shaw Aug 1995 A
5443645 Otoshi Aug 1995 A
5444207 Sekine Aug 1995 A
5449432 Hanawa Sep 1995 A
5452082 Sanger Sep 1995 A
5468520 Williams Nov 1995 A
5470388 Goedicke Nov 1995 A
5472660 Fortin Dec 1995 A
5485091 Verkuil Jan 1996 A
5486701 Norton Jan 1996 A
5494170 Burns Feb 1996 A
5494712 Hu Feb 1996 A
5495958 Konrad Mar 1996 A
5508075 Roulin Apr 1996 A
5510155 Williams Apr 1996 A
5513515 Mayer May 1996 A
5514276 Babcock May 1996 A
5521351 Mahoney May 1996 A
5522518 Konrad Jun 1996 A
5531060 Fayet Jul 1996 A
5531683 Kriesel Jul 1996 A
5536253 Haber Jul 1996 A
5543919 Mumola Aug 1996 A
5545375 Tropsha Aug 1996 A
5547508 Affinito Aug 1996 A
5547723 Williams Aug 1996 A
5554223 Imahashi Sep 1996 A
5555471 Xu Sep 1996 A
5565248 Piester Oct 1996 A
5569810 Tsuji Oct 1996 A
5571366 Ishii Nov 1996 A
5578103 Araujo Nov 1996 A
5591898 Mayer Jan 1997 A
5593550 Stewart Jan 1997 A
5597456 Maruyama Jan 1997 A
5616369 Williams Apr 1997 A
5620523 Maeda Apr 1997 A
5632396 Burns May 1997 A
5633711 Nelson May 1997 A
5643638 Otto Jul 1997 A
5652030 Delperier Jul 1997 A
5654054 Tropsha Aug 1997 A
5656141 Betz Aug 1997 A
5658438 Givens Aug 1997 A
5665280 Tropsha Sep 1997 A
5667840 Tingey Sep 1997 A
5674321 Pu Oct 1997 A
5677010 Esser Oct 1997 A
5679412 Kuehnle Oct 1997 A
5679413 Petrmichl Oct 1997 A
5683771 Tropsha Nov 1997 A
5686157 Harvey Nov 1997 A
5690745 Grunwald Nov 1997 A
5691007 Montgomery Nov 1997 A
5693196 Stewart Dec 1997 A
5699923 Burns Dec 1997 A
5702770 Martin Dec 1997 A
5704983 Thomas Jan 1998 A
5716683 Harvey Feb 1998 A
5718967 Hu Feb 1998 A
5725909 Shaw Mar 1998 A
5733405 Taki Mar 1998 A
5736207 Walther Apr 1998 A
5737179 Shaw Apr 1998 A
5738233 Burns Apr 1998 A
5738920 Knors Apr 1998 A
5744360 Hu Apr 1998 A
5750892 Huang May 1998 A
5763033 Tropsha Jun 1998 A
5766362 Montgomery Jun 1998 A
5769273 Sasaki Jun 1998 A
5779074 Burns Jul 1998 A
5779716 Cano Jul 1998 A
5779802 Borghs Jul 1998 A
5779849 Blalock Jul 1998 A
5788670 Reinhard Aug 1998 A
5792550 Phillips Aug 1998 A
5792940 Ghandhi Aug 1998 A
5798027 Lefebvre Aug 1998 A
5800880 Laurent Sep 1998 A
5807343 Tucker Sep 1998 A
5807605 Tingey Sep 1998 A
5812261 Nelson Sep 1998 A
5814257 Kawata Sep 1998 A
5814738 Pinkerton Sep 1998 A
5820603 Tucker Oct 1998 A
5823373 Sudo Oct 1998 A
5824198 Williams Oct 1998 A
5824607 Trow Oct 1998 A
5833752 Martin Nov 1998 A
5837888 Mayer Nov 1998 A
5837903 Weingand Nov 1998 A
5840167 Kim Nov 1998 A
5853833 Sudo Dec 1998 A
5855686 Rust Jan 1999 A
5861546 Sagi Jan 1999 A
5871700 Konrad Feb 1999 A
5877895 Shaw Mar 1999 A
5880034 Keller Mar 1999 A
5888414 Collins Mar 1999 A
5888591 Gleason Mar 1999 A
5897508 Konrad Apr 1999 A
5900284 Hu May 1999 A
5900285 Walther May 1999 A
5902461 Xu May 1999 A
5904952 Lopata May 1999 A
5913140 Roche Jun 1999 A
5914189 Hasz Jun 1999 A
5919328 Tropsha Jul 1999 A
5919420 Niermann Jul 1999 A
5935391 Nakahigashi Aug 1999 A
5945187 Buch-Rasmussen Aug 1999 A
5951527 Sudo Sep 1999 A
5952069 Tropsha Sep 1999 A
5955161 Tropsha Sep 1999 A
5961911 Hwang Oct 1999 A
5968620 Harvey Oct 1999 A
5972297 Niermann Oct 1999 A
5972436 Walther Oct 1999 A
5985103 Givens Nov 1999 A
6001429 Martin Dec 1999 A
6009743 Mayer Jan 2000 A
6013337 Knors Jan 2000 A
6017317 Newby Jan 2000 A
6018987 Mayer Feb 2000 A
6020196 Hu Feb 2000 A
6027619 Cathey Feb 2000 A
6032813 Niermann Mar 2000 A
6035717 Carodiskey Mar 2000 A
6050400 Taskis Apr 2000 A
6051151 Keller Apr 2000 A
6054016 Tuda Apr 2000 A
6054188 Tropsha Apr 2000 A
6068884 Rose May 2000 A
6077403 Kobayashi Jun 2000 A
6081330 Nelson Jun 2000 A
6082295 Lee Jul 2000 A
6083313 Venkatraman Jul 2000 A
6085927 Kusz Jul 2000 A
6090081 Sudo Jul 2000 A
6093175 Gyure Jul 2000 A
6106678 Shufflebotham Aug 2000 A
6110395 Gibson, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6110544 Yang Aug 2000 A
6112695 Felts Sep 2000 A
6116081 Ghandhi Sep 2000 A
6117243 Walther Sep 2000 A
6118844 Fischer Sep 2000 A
6125687 McClelland Oct 2000 A
6126640 Tucker Oct 2000 A
6129712 Sudo Oct 2000 A
6129956 Morra Oct 2000 A
6136275 Niermann Oct 2000 A
6139802 Niermann Oct 2000 A
6143140 Wang Nov 2000 A
6149982 Plester Nov 2000 A
6153269 Gleason Nov 2000 A
6156152 Ogino Dec 2000 A
6156399 Spallek Dec 2000 A
6156435 Gleason Dec 2000 A
6160350 Sakemi Dec 2000 A
6161712 Savitz Dec 2000 A
6163006 Doughty Dec 2000 A
6165138 Miller Dec 2000 A
6165542 Jaworowski Dec 2000 A
6165566 Tropsha Dec 2000 A
6171670 Sudo Jan 2001 B1
6175612 Sato Jan 2001 B1
6177142 Felts Jan 2001 B1
6180185 Felts Jan 2001 B1
6180191 Felts Jan 2001 B1
6188079 Juvinall Feb 2001 B1
6189484 Yin Feb 2001 B1
6190992 Sandhu Feb 2001 B1
6193853 Yumshtyk Feb 2001 B1
6196155 Setoyama Mar 2001 B1
6197166 Moslehi Mar 2001 B1
6200658 Walther Mar 2001 B1
6200675 Neerinck Mar 2001 B1
6204922 Chalmers Mar 2001 B1
6210791 Skoog Apr 2001 B1
6214422 Yializis Apr 2001 B1
6217716 Fai Lai Apr 2001 B1
6223683 Plester May 2001 B1
6236459 Negahdaripour May 2001 B1
6245190 Masuda Jun 2001 B1
6248219 Wellerdieck Jun 2001 B1
6248397 Ye Jun 2001 B1
6251792 Collins Jun 2001 B1
6254983 Namiki Jul 2001 B1
6261643 Hasz Jul 2001 B1
6263249 Stewart et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271047 Ushio Aug 2001 B1
6276296 Plester Aug 2001 B1
6277331 Konrad Aug 2001 B1
6279505 Plester Aug 2001 B1
6284986 Dietze Sep 2001 B1
6306132 Moorman Oct 2001 B1
6308556 Sagi Oct 2001 B1
6322661 Bailey, III Nov 2001 B1
6331174 Reinhard et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344034 Sudo Feb 2002 B1
6346596 Mallen Feb 2002 B1
6348967 Nelson Feb 2002 B1
6350415 Niermann Feb 2002 B1
6351075 Barankova Feb 2002 B1
6352629 Wang Mar 2002 B1
6354452 DeSalvo Mar 2002 B1
6355033 Moorman Mar 2002 B1
6365013 Beele Apr 2002 B1
6375022 Zurcher Apr 2002 B1
6376028 Laurent Apr 2002 B1
6379757 Iacovangelo Apr 2002 B1
6382441 Carano May 2002 B1
6394979 Sharp May 2002 B1
6396024 Doughty May 2002 B1
6399944 Vasilyev Jun 2002 B1
6402885 Loewenhardt Jun 2002 B2
6406792 Briquet et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410926 Munro Jun 2002 B1
6413645 Graff Jul 2002 B1
6432494 Yang Aug 2002 B1
6470650 Lohwasser Oct 2002 B1
6471822 Yin Oct 2002 B1
6475622 Namiki Nov 2002 B2
6482509 Buch-Rasmussen et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486081 Ishikawa Nov 2002 B1
6500500 Okamura Dec 2002 B1
6503579 Murakami Jan 2003 B1
6518195 Collins Feb 2003 B1
6524282 Sudo Feb 2003 B1
6524448 Brinkmann Feb 2003 B2
6539890 Felts Apr 2003 B1
6544610 Minami Apr 2003 B1
6551267 Cohen Apr 2003 B1
6558679 Flament-Garcia et al. May 2003 B2
6562010 Gyure May 2003 B1
6562189 Carducci May 2003 B1
6565791 Laurent May 2003 B1
6582426 Moorman Jun 2003 B2
6582823 Sakhrani et al. Jun 2003 B1
6584828 Sagi Jul 2003 B2
6595961 Hetzler Jul 2003 B2
6597193 Lagowski Jul 2003 B2
6599569 Humele Jul 2003 B1
6599594 Walther Jul 2003 B1
6602206 Niermann Aug 2003 B1
6616632 Sharp Sep 2003 B2
6620139 Plicchi Sep 2003 B1
6620334 Kanno Sep 2003 B2
6623861 Martin Sep 2003 B2
6638403 Inaba Oct 2003 B1
6638876 Levy Oct 2003 B2
6645354 Gorokhovsky Nov 2003 B1
6645635 Muraki Nov 2003 B2
6651835 Iskra Nov 2003 B2
6652520 Moorman Nov 2003 B2
6656540 Sakamoto Dec 2003 B2
6658919 Chatard Dec 2003 B2
6662957 Zurcher Dec 2003 B2
6663601 Hetzler Dec 2003 B2
6663603 Gyure Dec 2003 B1
6670200 Ushio Dec 2003 B2
6673199 Yamartino Jan 2004 B1
6680091 Buch-Rasmussen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680621 Savtchouk Jan 2004 B2
6683308 Itagaki Jan 2004 B2
6684683 Potyrailo Feb 2004 B2
6702898 Hosoi Mar 2004 B2
6706412 Yializis Mar 2004 B2
6746430 Lubrecht Jun 2004 B2
6749078 Iskra Jun 2004 B2
6752899 Singh Jun 2004 B1
6753972 Hirose Jun 2004 B1
6757056 Meeks Jun 2004 B1
6764714 Wei Jul 2004 B2
6765466 Miyata Jul 2004 B2
6766682 Engle Jul 2004 B2
6774018 Mikhael Aug 2004 B2
6796780 Chatard Sep 2004 B1
6800852 Larson Oct 2004 B2
6808753 Rule Oct 2004 B2
6810106 Sato Oct 2004 B2
6815014 Gabelnick Nov 2004 B2
6818310 Namiki Nov 2004 B2
6822015 Muraki Nov 2004 B2
6837954 Carano Jan 2005 B2
6844075 Saak Jan 2005 B1
6853141 Hoffman Feb 2005 B2
6858259 Affinito Feb 2005 B2
6863731 Elsayed-Ali Mar 2005 B2
6864773 Perrin Mar 2005 B2
6866656 Tingey Mar 2005 B2
6872428 Yang Mar 2005 B2
6876154 Appleyard Apr 2005 B2
6885727 Tamura Apr 2005 B2
6887578 Gleason May 2005 B2
6891158 Larson May 2005 B2
6892567 Morrow May 2005 B1
6899054 Bardos May 2005 B1
6905769 Komada Jun 2005 B2
6910597 Iskra Jun 2005 B2
6911779 Madocks Jun 2005 B2
6919107 Schwarzenbach Jul 2005 B2
6919114 Darras Jul 2005 B1
6933460 Vanden Brande Aug 2005 B2
6946164 Huang Sep 2005 B2
6952949 Moore Oct 2005 B2
6960393 Yializis Nov 2005 B2
6962671 Martin Nov 2005 B2
6965221 Lipcsei Nov 2005 B2
6981403 Ascheman Jan 2006 B2
6989675 Kesil Jan 2006 B2
6995377 Darr Feb 2006 B2
7029755 Terry Apr 2006 B2
7029803 Becker Apr 2006 B2
7039158 Janik May 2006 B1
7052736 Wei May 2006 B2
7052920 Ushio May 2006 B2
7059268 Russell Jun 2006 B2
7067034 Bailey, III Jun 2006 B2
7074501 Czeremuszkin Jul 2006 B2
7098453 Ando Aug 2006 B2
7109070 Behle Sep 2006 B2
7112352 Schaepkens Sep 2006 B2
7112541 Xia Sep 2006 B2
7115310 Jacoud Oct 2006 B2
7118538 Konrad Oct 2006 B2
7119908 Nomoto Oct 2006 B2
7121135 Moore Oct 2006 B2
7130373 Omote Oct 2006 B2
7150299 Hertzler Dec 2006 B2
7160292 Moorman Jan 2007 B2
7183197 Won Feb 2007 B2
7186242 Gyure Mar 2007 B2
7188734 Konrad Mar 2007 B2
7189290 Hama Mar 2007 B2
7193724 Isei Mar 2007 B2
7198685 Hetzler Apr 2007 B2
7206074 Fujimoto Apr 2007 B2
7214214 Sudo May 2007 B2
7244381 Chatard Jul 2007 B2
7253892 Semersky Aug 2007 B2
7286242 Kim Oct 2007 B2
7288293 Koulik Oct 2007 B2
7297216 Hetzler Nov 2007 B2
7300684 Boardman Nov 2007 B2
7303789 Saito Dec 2007 B2
7303790 Delaunay Dec 2007 B2
7306852 Komada Dec 2007 B2
7332227 Hardman Feb 2008 B2
7338576 Ono Mar 2008 B2
7339682 Aiyer Mar 2008 B2
7344766 Sorensen Mar 2008 B1
7348055 Chappa Mar 2008 B2
7348192 Mikami Mar 2008 B2
7362425 Meeks Apr 2008 B2
7381469 Moelle Jun 2008 B2
7390573 Korevaar Jun 2008 B2
7399500 Bicker Jul 2008 B2
7405008 Domine Jul 2008 B2
7409313 Ringermacher Aug 2008 B2
7411685 Takashima Aug 2008 B2
RE40531 Graff Oct 2008 E
7431989 Sakhrani Oct 2008 B2
7438783 Miyata Oct 2008 B2
7444955 Boardman Nov 2008 B2
7455892 Goodwin Nov 2008 B2
7480363 Lasiuk Jan 2009 B2
7488683 Kobayashi Feb 2009 B2
7494941 Kasahara Feb 2009 B2
7507378 Reichenbach Mar 2009 B2
7513953 Felts Apr 2009 B1
7520965 Wei Apr 2009 B2
7521022 Konrad Apr 2009 B2
7534615 Havens May 2009 B2
7534733 Bookbinder May 2009 B2
RE40787 Martin Jun 2009 E
7541069 Tudhope Jun 2009 B2
7547297 Brinkhues Jun 2009 B2
7552620 DeRoos Jun 2009 B2
7553529 Sakhrani Jun 2009 B2
7555934 DeRoos Jul 2009 B2
7569035 Wilmot Aug 2009 B1
7579056 Brown Aug 2009 B2
7582868 Jiang Sep 2009 B2
7595097 Iacovangelo Sep 2009 B2
7608151 Tudhope Oct 2009 B2
7618686 Colpo Nov 2009 B2
7624622 Mayer Dec 2009 B1
7625494 Honda Dec 2009 B2
7645696 Dulkin Jan 2010 B1
7648481 Geiger Jan 2010 B2
7682816 Kim Mar 2010 B2
7691308 Brinkhues Apr 2010 B2
7694403 Moulton Apr 2010 B2
7704683 Wittenberg Apr 2010 B2
7713638 Moelle May 2010 B2
7736689 Chappa Jun 2010 B2
7740610 Moh Jun 2010 B2
7744567 Glowacki Jun 2010 B2
7744790 Behle Jun 2010 B2
7745228 Schwind Jun 2010 B2
7745547 Auerbach Jun 2010 B1
7749202 Miller Jul 2010 B2
7749914 Honda Jul 2010 B2
7754302 Yamasaki Jul 2010 B2
7766882 Sudo Aug 2010 B2
7780866 Miller Aug 2010 B2
7785862 Kim Aug 2010 B2
7790475 Galbraith Sep 2010 B2
7798993 Lim Sep 2010 B2
7803305 Ahern Sep 2010 B2
7807242 Soerensen Oct 2010 B2
7815922 Chaney Oct 2010 B2
7846293 Iwasaki Dec 2010 B2
7854889 Perot Dec 2010 B2
7867366 McFarland Jan 2011 B1
7905866 Haider Mar 2011 B2
7922880 Pradhan Apr 2011 B1
7922958 D'Arrigo Apr 2011 B2
7927315 Sudo Apr 2011 B2
7931955 Behle Apr 2011 B2
7932678 Madocks Apr 2011 B2
7934613 Sudo May 2011 B2
7943205 Schaepkens May 2011 B2
7947337 Kuepper May 2011 B2
7955986 Hoffman Jun 2011 B2
7960043 Harris Jun 2011 B2
7964438 Roca I Cabarrocas Jun 2011 B2
7967945 Glukhoy Jun 2011 B2
7975646 Rius Jul 2011 B2
7985188 Felts et al. Jul 2011 B2
8002754 Kawamura Aug 2011 B2
8025915 Haines Sep 2011 B2
8038858 Bures Oct 2011 B1
8039524 Chappa Oct 2011 B2
8056719 Porret Nov 2011 B2
8062266 McKinnon Nov 2011 B2
8066663 Sudo Nov 2011 B2
8066854 Storey Nov 2011 B2
8070917 Tsukamoto Dec 2011 B2
8075995 Zhao Dec 2011 B2
8092605 Shannon Jan 2012 B2
8101246 Fayet Jan 2012 B2
8101674 Kawauchi Jan 2012 B2
8105294 Araki Jan 2012 B2
8197452 Harding Jun 2012 B2
8258486 Avnery Sep 2012 B2
8268410 Moelle Sep 2012 B2
8273222 Wei Sep 2012 B2
8277025 Nakazawa et al. Oct 2012 B2
8313455 Digregorio Nov 2012 B2
8323166 Haines Dec 2012 B2
8389958 Vo-Dinh Mar 2013 B2
8397667 Behle Mar 2013 B2
8409441 Wilt Apr 2013 B2
8418650 Goto Apr 2013 B2
8435605 Aitken et al. May 2013 B2
8475886 Chen et al. Jul 2013 B2
8512796 Felts et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524331 Honda Sep 2013 B2
8592015 Bicker Nov 2013 B2
8597720 Hoffmann et al. Dec 2013 B2
8603638 Liu Dec 2013 B2
8618509 Vo-Dinh Dec 2013 B2
8623324 Diwu Jan 2014 B2
8633034 Trotter Jan 2014 B2
8747962 Bicker Jun 2014 B2
8802603 D'Souza et al. Aug 2014 B2
8816022 Zhao Aug 2014 B2
9068565 Alarcon Jun 2015 B2
20010000279 Daniels Apr 2001 A1
20010021356 Konrad Sep 2001 A1
20010038894 Komada Nov 2001 A1
20010042510 Plester Nov 2001 A1
20010043997 Uddin Nov 2001 A1
20020006487 O'Connor Jan 2002 A1
20020007796 Gorokhovsky Jan 2002 A1
20020070647 Ginovker Jun 2002 A1
20020117114 Ikenaga Aug 2002 A1
20020125900 Savtchouk Sep 2002 A1
20020130674 Lagowski Sep 2002 A1
20020141477 Akahori Oct 2002 A1
20020153103 Madocks Oct 2002 A1
20020155218 Meyer Oct 2002 A1
20020170495 Nakamura Nov 2002 A1
20020176947 Darras Nov 2002 A1
20020182101 Koulik Dec 2002 A1
20020185226 Lea Dec 2002 A1
20020190207 Levy Dec 2002 A1
20030010454 Bailey, III Jan 2003 A1
20030013818 Hakuta Jan 2003 A1
20030029837 Trow Feb 2003 A1
20030031806 Jinks Feb 2003 A1
20030046982 Chartard Mar 2003 A1
20030102087 Ito Jun 2003 A1
20030119193 Hess Jun 2003 A1
20030159654 Arnold Aug 2003 A1
20030215652 O'Connor Nov 2003 A1
20030219547 Arnold Nov 2003 A1
20030232150 Arnold Dec 2003 A1
20040024371 Plicchi Feb 2004 A1
20040039401 Chow Feb 2004 A1
20040040372 Plester Mar 2004 A1
20040045811 Wang Mar 2004 A1
20040050744 Hama Mar 2004 A1
20040055538 Gorokhovsky Mar 2004 A1
20040071960 Weber Apr 2004 A1
20040082917 Hetzler Apr 2004 A1
20040084151 Kim May 2004 A1
20040125913 Larson Jul 2004 A1
20040135081 Larson Jul 2004 A1
20040149225 Weikart Aug 2004 A1
20040177676 Moore Sep 2004 A1
20040195960 Czeremuszkin Oct 2004 A1
20040206309 Bera Oct 2004 A1
20040217081 Konrad Nov 2004 A1
20040247948 Behle Dec 2004 A1
20040267194 Sano Dec 2004 A1
20050000962 Crawford Jan 2005 A1
20050010175 Beedon Jan 2005 A1
20050019503 Komada Jan 2005 A1
20050037165 Ahern Feb 2005 A1
20050039854 Matsuyama Feb 2005 A1
20050045472 Nagata Mar 2005 A1
20050057754 Smith Mar 2005 A1
20050073323 Kohno Apr 2005 A1
20050075611 Hetzler Apr 2005 A1
20050075612 Lee Apr 2005 A1
20050161149 Yokota Jul 2005 A1
20050169803 Betz Aug 2005 A1
20050190450 Becker Sep 2005 A1
20050196629 Bariatinsky Sep 2005 A1
20050199571 Geisler Sep 2005 A1
20050206907 Fujimoto Sep 2005 A1
20050211383 Miyata Sep 2005 A1
20050223988 Behle Oct 2005 A1
20050227002 Lizenberg Oct 2005 A1
20050227022 Domine Oct 2005 A1
20050229850 Behle Oct 2005 A1
20050233077 Lizenberg Oct 2005 A1
20050233091 Kumar Oct 2005 A1
20050236346 Whitney Oct 2005 A1
20050260504 Becker Nov 2005 A1
20050284550 Bicker Dec 2005 A1
20060005608 Kitzhoffer Jan 2006 A1
20060013997 Kuepper Jan 2006 A1
20060014309 Sachdev Jan 2006 A1
20060024849 Zhu Feb 2006 A1
20060042755 Holmberg Mar 2006 A1
20060046006 Bastion Mar 2006 A1
20060051252 Yuan Mar 2006 A1
20060051520 Behle Mar 2006 A1
20060076231 Wei Apr 2006 A1
20060086320 Lizenberg Apr 2006 A1
20060099340 Behle May 2006 A1
20060121222 Audrich Jun 2006 A1
20060121613 Havens Jun 2006 A1
20060121623 He Jun 2006 A1
20060127443 Helmus Jun 2006 A1
20060127699 Moelle Jun 2006 A1
20060135945 Bankiewicz Jun 2006 A1
20060138326 Jiang Jun 2006 A1
20060150909 Behle Jul 2006 A1
20060169026 Kage Aug 2006 A1
20060178627 Geiger Aug 2006 A1
20060183345 Nguyen Aug 2006 A1
20060192973 Aiyer Aug 2006 A1
20060196419 Tudhope Sep 2006 A1
20060198903 Storey Sep 2006 A1
20060198965 Tudhope Sep 2006 A1
20060200078 Konrad Sep 2006 A1
20060200084 Ito Sep 2006 A1
20060210425 Mirkarimi Sep 2006 A1
20060228497 Kumar Oct 2006 A1
20060260360 Dick Nov 2006 A1
20070003441 Wohleb Jan 2007 A1
20070009673 Fukazawa et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070017870 Belov Jan 2007 A1
20070048456 Keshner Mar 2007 A1
20070049048 Rauf Mar 2007 A1
20070051629 Dolnik Mar 2007 A1
20070065680 Schultheis Mar 2007 A1
20070076833 Becker Apr 2007 A1
20070102344 Konrad May 2007 A1
20070123920 Inokuti May 2007 A1
20070148326 Hatings Jun 2007 A1
20070166187 Song Jul 2007 A1
20070184657 Iijima Aug 2007 A1
20070187229 Aksenov Aug 2007 A1
20070187280 Haines Aug 2007 A1
20070205096 Nagashima Sep 2007 A1
20070215009 Shimazu Sep 2007 A1
20070215046 Lupke et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070218265 Harris Sep 2007 A1
20070224236 Boden Sep 2007 A1
20070231655 Ha Oct 2007 A1
20070232066 Bicker Oct 2007 A1
20070235890 Lewis Oct 2007 A1
20070243618 Hatchett Oct 2007 A1
20070251458 Mund Nov 2007 A1
20070258894 Melker et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259184 Martin Nov 2007 A1
20070281108 Weikart Dec 2007 A1
20070281117 Kaplan Dec 2007 A1
20070287950 Kjeken Dec 2007 A1
20070287954 Zhao Dec 2007 A1
20070298189 Straemke Dec 2007 A1
20080011232 Rius Jan 2008 A1
20080017113 Goto Jan 2008 A1
20080023414 Konrad Jan 2008 A1
20080027400 Harding Jan 2008 A1
20080045880 Kjeken Feb 2008 A1
20080050567 Kawashima Feb 2008 A1
20080050932 Lakshmanan Feb 2008 A1
20080053373 Mund Mar 2008 A1
20080069970 Wu Mar 2008 A1
20080071228 Wu Mar 2008 A1
20080081184 Kubo Apr 2008 A1
20080090039 Klein Apr 2008 A1
20080093245 Periasamy Apr 2008 A1
20080102206 Wagner May 2008 A1
20080109017 Herweck May 2008 A1
20080110852 Kuroda May 2008 A1
20080113109 Moelle May 2008 A1
20080118734 Goodwin May 2008 A1
20080131628 Abensour Jun 2008 A1
20080131638 Hutton Jun 2008 A1
20080139003 Pirzada Jun 2008 A1
20080145271 Kidambi Jun 2008 A1
20080187681 Hofrichter Aug 2008 A1
20080195059 Sudo Aug 2008 A1
20080202414 Yan Aug 2008 A1
20080206477 Rius Aug 2008 A1
20080210550 Walther Sep 2008 A1
20080220164 Bauch Sep 2008 A1
20080223815 Konrad Sep 2008 A1
20080233355 Henze Sep 2008 A1
20080260966 Hanawa Oct 2008 A1
20080268252 Garces Oct 2008 A1
20080277332 Liu Nov 2008 A1
20080289957 Takigawa Nov 2008 A1
20080292806 Wei Nov 2008 A1
20080295772 Park Dec 2008 A1
20080303131 Mcelrea Dec 2008 A1
20080312607 Delmotte Dec 2008 A1
20080314318 Han Dec 2008 A1
20090004363 Keshner Jan 2009 A1
20090017217 Hass Jan 2009 A1
20090022981 Yoshida Jan 2009 A1
20090029402 Papkovsky Jan 2009 A1
20090031953 Ingle Feb 2009 A1
20090032393 Madocks Feb 2009 A1
20090039240 Van Nijnatten Feb 2009 A1
20090053491 Loboda Feb 2009 A1
20090061237 Gates Mar 2009 A1
20090065485 O'Neill Mar 2009 A1
20090081797 Fadeev Mar 2009 A1
20090099512 Digregorio Apr 2009 A1
20090104392 Takada Apr 2009 A1
20090117268 Lewis May 2009 A1
20090117389 Amberg-Schwab May 2009 A1
20090122832 Feist May 2009 A1
20090134884 Bosselmann May 2009 A1
20090137966 Rueckert May 2009 A1
20090142227 Fuchs Jun 2009 A1
20090142514 O'Neill Jun 2009 A1
20090147719 Kang Jun 2009 A1
20090149816 Hetzler Jun 2009 A1
20090155490 Bicker Jun 2009 A1
20090162571 Haines Jun 2009 A1
20090166312 Giraud Jul 2009 A1
20090176031 Armellin Jul 2009 A1
20090220948 Oviso et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090263668 David Oct 2009 A1
20090280268 Glukhoy Nov 2009 A1
20090297730 Glukhoy Dec 2009 A1
20090306595 Shih Dec 2009 A1
20090326517 Bork Dec 2009 A1
20100021998 Sanyal Jan 2010 A1
20100028238 Maschwitz Feb 2010 A1
20100034985 Krueger Feb 2010 A1
20100042055 Sudo Feb 2010 A1
20100075077 Bicker Mar 2010 A1
20100089097 Brack Apr 2010 A1
20100105208 Winniczek Apr 2010 A1
20100132762 Graham, Jr. Jun 2010 A1
20100136073 Preuss et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145284 Togashi Jun 2010 A1
20100174239 Yodfat Jul 2010 A1
20100174245 Halverson Jul 2010 A1
20100178490 Cerny Jul 2010 A1
20100185157 Kawamura Jul 2010 A1
20100186740 Lewis Jul 2010 A1
20100190036 Komvopoulos Jul 2010 A1
20100193461 Boutroy Aug 2010 A1
20100198554 Skliar Aug 2010 A1
20100204648 Stout Aug 2010 A1
20100230281 Park Sep 2010 A1
20100231194 Bauch Sep 2010 A1
20100237545 Haury Sep 2010 A1
20100264139 Kawachi Oct 2010 A1
20100273261 Chen Oct 2010 A1
20100275847 Yamasaki Nov 2010 A1
20100279397 Crawford Nov 2010 A1
20100298738 Felts Nov 2010 A1
20100298779 Hetzler Nov 2010 A1
20110037159 Mcelrea Feb 2011 A1
20110046570 Stout Feb 2011 A1
20110056912 Matsuyama Mar 2011 A1
20110062047 Haines Mar 2011 A1
20110065798 Hoang Mar 2011 A1
20110079582 Yonesu Apr 2011 A1
20110093056 Kaplan Apr 2011 A1
20110111132 Wei May 2011 A1
20110117202 Bourke, Jr. May 2011 A1
20110117288 Honda May 2011 A1
20110137263 Ashmead Jun 2011 A1
20110152820 Chattaraj Jun 2011 A1
20110159101 Kurdyumov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160662 Stout Jun 2011 A1
20110160663 Stout Jun 2011 A1
20110174220 Laure Jul 2011 A1
20110186537 Rodriguez San Juan Aug 2011 A1
20110220490 Wei Sep 2011 A1
20110252899 Felts Oct 2011 A1
20110253674 Chung Oct 2011 A1
20110313363 D'Souza et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319758 Wang Dec 2011 A1
20110319813 Kamen Dec 2011 A1
20120003497 Handy Jan 2012 A1
20120004339 Chappa Jan 2012 A1
20120021136 Dzengeleski Jan 2012 A1
20120031070 Slough Feb 2012 A1
20120035543 Kamen Feb 2012 A1
20120052123 Kurdyumov et al. Mar 2012 A9
20120053530 Zhao Mar 2012 A1
20120058351 Zhao Mar 2012 A1
20120065612 Stout Mar 2012 A1
20120097527 Kodaira Apr 2012 A1
20120097870 Leray Apr 2012 A1
20120108058 Ha May 2012 A1
20120109076 Kawamura May 2012 A1
20120123345 Felts May 2012 A1
20120143148 Zhao Jun 2012 A1
20120149871 Saxena Jun 2012 A1
20120171386 Bicker Jul 2012 A1
20120175384 Greter Jul 2012 A1
20120183954 Diwu Jul 2012 A1
20120205374 Klumpen Aug 2012 A1
20120231182 Stevens Sep 2012 A1
20120234720 Digregorio Sep 2012 A1
20120252709 Felts Oct 2012 A1
20130041241 Felts et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130057677 Weil Mar 2013 A1
20130072025 Singh Mar 2013 A1
20130081953 Bruna et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130190695 Wu Jul 2013 A1
20130209704 Krueger Aug 2013 A1
20130296235 Alarcon Nov 2013 A1
20140010969 Bicker Jan 2014 A1
20140052076 Zhao Feb 2014 A1
20140054803 Chen Feb 2014 A1
20140099455 Stanley Apr 2014 A1
20140110297 Trotter Apr 2014 A1
20140135708 Lewis May 2014 A1
20140147654 Walther May 2014 A1
20140151320 Chang Jun 2014 A1
20140151370 Chang Jun 2014 A1
20140154399 Weikart et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140187666 Aizenberg Jul 2014 A1
20140190846 Belt Jul 2014 A1
20140221934 Janvier Aug 2014 A1
20140251856 Larsson Sep 2014 A1
20140305830 Bicker Oct 2014 A1
20150165125 Foucher Jun 2015 A1
20150224263 Dugand Aug 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (303)
Number Date Country
414209 Oct 2006 AT
504533 Jun 2008 AT
2002354470 May 2007 AU
2085805 Dec 1992 CA
2277679 Jul 1997 CA
2355681 Jul 2000 CA
2571380 Jul 2006 CA
2718253 Sep 2009 CA
2268719 Aug 2010 CA
2546041 Apr 2003 CN
1711310 Dec 2005 CN
2766863 Mar 2006 CN
1898172 Jan 2007 CN
201002786 Jan 2008 CN
101147813 Mar 2008 CN
201056331 May 2008 CN
102581274 Jul 2012 CN
1147836 Apr 1969 DE
1147838 Apr 1969 DE
3632748 Apr 1988 DE
3908418 Sep 1990 DE
4214401 Mar 1993 DE
4204082 Aug 1993 DE
4316349 Nov 1994 DE
4438359 May 1996 DE
197076454 Aug 1998 DE
19830794 Jan 2000 DE
19912737 Jun 2000 DE
10010831 Sep 2001 DE
10154404 Jun 2003 DE
10201110 Oct 2003 DE
10242698 Mar 2004 DE
10246181 Apr 2004 DE
10353540 May 2004 DE
102004017236 Oct 2005 DE
102006061585 Feb 2008 DE
102008023027 Nov 2009 DE
0121340 Oct 1984 EP
0251812 Jan 1988 EP
0275965 Jul 1988 EP
0284867 Oct 1988 EP
0306307 Mar 1989 EP
0329041 Aug 1989 EP
0343017 Nov 1989 EP
0396919 Nov 1990 EP
0482613 Oct 1991 EP
0484746 Oct 1991 EP
0495447 Jul 1992 EP
0520519 Dec 1992 EP
0535810 Apr 1993 EP
0375778 Sep 1993 EP
0571116 Nov 1993 EP
0580094 Jan 1994 EP
0603717 Jun 1994 EP
0619178 Oct 1994 EP
0645470 Mar 1995 EP
0697378 Feb 1996 EP
0709485 May 1996 EP
0719877 Jul 1996 EP
0728676 Aug 1996 EP
0787824 Aug 1997 EP
0787828 Aug 1997 EP
0814114 Dec 1997 EP
0833366 Apr 1998 EP
0879611 Nov 1998 EP
0940183 Sep 1999 EP
0962229 Dec 1999 EP
0992610 Apr 2000 EP
1119034 Jul 2001 EP
0954272 Mar 2002 EP
1245694 Oct 2002 EP
1388594 Jan 2003 EP
1317937 Jun 2003 EP
1365043 Nov 2003 EP
1367145 Dec 2003 EP
1388593 Feb 2004 EP
1439241 Jul 2004 EP
1447459 Aug 2004 EP
1990639 Feb 2005 EP
1510595 Mar 2005 EP
1522403 Apr 2005 EP
1901067 Aug 2005 EP
1507894 Dec 2005 EP
1507723 Mar 2006 EP
1653192 May 2006 EP
1810758 Jul 2007 EP
1356260 Dec 2007 EP
1870117 Dec 2007 EP
1881088 Jan 2008 EP
1507887 Jul 2008 EP
1415018 Oct 2008 EP
2199264 Nov 2009 EP
1388594 Jan 2010 EP
2178109 Apr 2010 EP
1507895 Jul 2010 EP
2218465 Aug 2010 EP
2243751 Oct 2010 EP
2251671 Nov 2010 EP
2261185 Dec 2010 EP
2369038 Sep 2011 EP
1960279 Oct 2011 EP
2602354 Jun 2013 EP
2639330 Sep 2013 EP
891892 Nov 1942 FR
752822 Jul 1956 GB
1363762 Aug 1974 GB
1513426 Jun 1978 GB
1566251 Apr 1980 GB
2210826 Jun 1989 GB
2231197 Nov 1990 GB
2246794 Feb 1992 GB
2246795 Feb 1992 GB
2387964 Oct 2003 GB
56027330 Mar 1981 JP
58154602 Sep 1983 JP
59087307 May 1984 JP
59154029 Sep 1984 JP
S61183462 Aug 1986 JP
S62180069 Aug 1987 JP
S62290866 Dec 1987 JP
63124521 May 1988 JP
1023105 Jan 1989 JP
H01225775 Sep 1989 JP
1279745 Nov 1989 JP
2501490 May 1990 JP
3183759 Aug 1991 JP
H03260065 Nov 1991 JP
H03271374 Dec 1991 JP
4000373 Jan 1992 JP
4000374 Jan 1992 JP
4000375 Jan 1992 JP
4014440 Jan 1992 JP
H04124273 Apr 1992 JP
H0578844 Mar 1993 JP
05-096688 Apr 1993 JP
H05263223 Oct 1993 JP
6010132 Jan 1994 JP
6289401 Oct 1994 JP
7041579 Feb 1995 JP
7068614 Mar 1995 JP
7126419 May 1995 JP
8025244 Jan 1996 JP
8084773 Apr 1996 JP
H08296038 Nov 1996 JP
9005038 Jan 1997 JP
10008254 Jan 1998 JP
11-108833 Apr 1999 JP
11106920 Apr 1999 JP
H11256331 Sep 1999 JP
11344316 Dec 1999 JP
2000064040 Feb 2000 JP
2000109076 Apr 2000 JP
2001033398 Feb 2001 JP
2001231841 Aug 2001 JP
2002177364 Jun 2002 JP
2002206167 Jul 2002 JP
2002371364 Dec 2002 JP
2003171771 Jun 2003 JP
2003-268550 Sep 2003 JP
2003294431 Oct 2003 JP
2003305121 Oct 2003 JP
2004002928 Jan 2004 JP
2004008509 Jan 2004 JP
2004043789 Feb 2004 JP
2004100036 Apr 2004 JP
2004156444 Jun 2004 JP
2004168359 Jun 2004 JP
2004169087 Jun 2004 JP
2004203682 Jul 2004 JP
2004-253683 Sep 2004 JP
2004307935 Nov 2004 JP
2005035597 Feb 2005 JP
2005043285 Feb 2005 JP
2005132416 May 2005 JP
2005160888 Jun 2005 JP
2005200044 Jul 2005 JP
2005-241524 Sep 2005 JP
2005271997 Oct 2005 JP
2005290561 Oct 2005 JP
2006111967 Apr 2006 JP
2006160268 Jun 2006 JP
2006-224992 Aug 2006 JP
2006249577 Sep 2006 JP
2007050898 Mar 2007 JP
2007231386 Sep 2007 JP
2007246974 Sep 2007 JP
2008174793 Jul 2008 JP
2009-062620 Mar 2009 JP
2009062620 Mar 2009 JP
2009079298 Apr 2009 JP
2009084203 Apr 2009 JP
2009185330 Aug 2009 JP
2010155134 Jul 2010 JP
2012210315 Nov 2012 JP
10-2006-0029694 Apr 2006 KR
10-0685594 Feb 2007 KR
1530913 Dec 1989 SU
200703536 Jan 2007 TW
WO9324243 Dec 1993 WO
WO9400247 Jan 1994 WO
WO9426497 Nov 1994 WO
WO9524275 Sep 1995 WO
WO9624392 Aug 1996 WO
WO9711482 Mar 1997 WO
WO98-27926 Jul 1998 WO
WO9845871 Oct 1998 WO
WO9917334 Apr 1999 WO
WO9941425 Aug 1999 WO
WO9950471 Oct 1999 WO
WO0038566 Jul 2000 WO
WO0104668 Jan 2001 WO
WO0125788 Apr 2001 WO
WO0154816 Aug 2001 WO
WO0156706 Aug 2001 WO
WO0170403 Sep 2001 WO
WO0243116 May 2002 WO
WO0249925 Jun 2002 WO
WO02056333 Jul 2002 WO
WO02072914 Sep 2002 WO
WO02076709 Oct 2002 WO
WO03014415 Feb 2003 WO
WO03033426 Apr 2003 WO
WO03038143 May 2003 WO
WO03040649 May 2003 WO
WO03044240 May 2003 WO
WO2005035147 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005052555 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005051525 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005103605 Nov 2005 WO
WO2006012881 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006027568 Mar 2006 WO
WO2006029743 Mar 2006 WO
WO2006044254 Apr 2006 WO
WO2006048276 May 2006 WO
WO2006048277 May 2006 WO
WO2006069774 Jul 2006 WO
WO2006135755 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007028061 Mar 2007 WO
WO2007035741 Mar 2007 WO
WO2007036544 Apr 2007 WO
WO2007081814 Jul 2007 WO
WO2007089216 Aug 2007 WO
WO2007112328 Oct 2007 WO
WO2007120507 Oct 2007 WO
WO2007133378 Nov 2007 WO
WO2007134347 Nov 2007 WO
WO2008014438 Jan 2008 WO
WO2008024566 Feb 2008 WO
WO2008040531 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008047541 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008067574 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008071458 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008093335 Aug 2008 WO
WO2009015862 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009020550 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009021257 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009030974 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009030975 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009030976 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009031838 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009040109 Apr 2009 WO
WO2009053947 Apr 2009 WO
WO2009112053 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009117032 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009118361 Oct 2009 WO
WO2009158613 Dec 2009 WO
WO2010047825 Apr 2010 WO
WO2010095011 Aug 2010 WO
WO2010132579 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132581 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132584 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132585 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132589 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132591 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010034004 Nov 2010 WO
WO2010132579 Nov 2010 WO
WO2011029628 Mar 2011 WO
WO2011007055 Jun 2011 WO
WO2011080543 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011082296 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011090717 Jul 2011 WO
WO2011143329 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011143509 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011143509 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011137437 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011143329 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011159975 Dec 2011 WO
WO2012003221 Jan 2012 WO
WO2012009653 Jan 2012 WO
WO2013045671 Apr 2013 WO
WO2013071138 May 2013 WO
WO2013071138 May 2013 WO
WO2013170044 Nov 2013 WO
WO2013170052 Nov 2013 WO
WO2014008138 Jan 2014 WO
WO2014059012 Apr 2014 WO
WO2014071061 May 2014 WO
WO2014078666 May 2014 WO
WO2014085346 Jun 2014 WO
WO2014085348 Jun 2014 WO
WO2014134577 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014144926 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014164928 Oct 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (191)
Entry
US 5,645,643, 07/1997, Thomas (withdrawn)
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/064121, dated Mar. 24, 2014. (8 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/070325, dated Mar. 24, 2014. (16 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2010249031, dated Mar. 13, 2014. (4 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2013202893, dated Mar. 13, 2014. (4 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 93(3) EPC, in Application No. 11 731 554.9 dated Apr. 15, 2014. (7 pages).
PCT, Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US2012/064489, dated May 22, 2014. (10 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/071750, dated Apr. 4, 2014. (13 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2014/019684, dated May 23, 2014. (16 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2014/023813, dated May 22, 2014. (11 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 11 736 511.4, dated Mar. 28, 2014.
PCT, Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US2011/042387, dated Jan. 17, 2013. (7 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action, in Application No. 201180032145.4, dated Jan. 30, 2014. (16 pages).
PCT, Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US2011/044215, dated Jan. 31, 2013. (14 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2012318242, dated Apr. 30, 2014. (6 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action, in Application No. 201180023461.5, dated May 21, 2014. (25 pages).
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 10162758.6 dated May 27, 2014. (7 pages).
Allison, H.L., The Real Markets for Transparent Barrier Films, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1994, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 458.
Bailey, R. et al., Thin-Film Multilayer Capacitors Using Pyrolytically Deposited Silicon Dioxide, IEEE Transactions on Parts, Hybrids, and Packaging, vol. PHP-12, No. 4, Dec. 1976, pp. 361-364.
Banks, B.A., et al., Fluoropolymer Filled SiO2 Coatings; Properties and Potential Applications, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 89-93.
Baouchi, W., X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Sodium Ion Migration through Thin Films of SiO2 Deposited on Sodalime Glass, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1994, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 419-422.
Boebel, F. et al., Simultaneous In Situ Measurement of Film Thickness and Temperature by Using Multiple Wavelengths Pyrometric Interferometry (MWPI), IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 6, No. 2, May 1993, , pp. 112-118.
Bush, V. et al., The Evolution of Evacuated Blood Collection Tubes, BD Diagnostics—Preanalytical Systems Newsletter, vol. 19, No. 1, 2009.
Chahroudi, D., Deposition Technology for Glass Barriers, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 212-220.
Chahroudi, D., et al., Transparent Glass Barrier Coatings for Flexible Film Packaging, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 130-133.
Chahroudi, D., Glassy Barriers from Electron Beam Web Coaters, 32nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1989, pp. 29-39.
Czeremuszkin, G. et al., Ultrathin Silicon-Compound Barrier Coatings for Polymeric Packaging Materials: An Industrial Perspective, Plasmas and Polymers, vol. 6, Nos. 1/2, Jun. 2001, pp. 107-120.
Ebihara, K. et al., Application of the Dielectric Barrier Discharge to Detect Defects in a Teflon Coated Metal Surface, 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 2883-2886, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/23/003, IOP Electronic Journals, http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0022-3727/36/23/003, printed Jul. 14, 2009.
Egitto, F.D., et al., Plasma Modification of Polymer Surfaces, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 10-21.
Erlat, A.G. et al., SiOx Gas Barrier Coatings on Polymer Substrates: Morphology and Gas Transport Considerations, ACS Publications, Journal of Physical Chemistry, published Jul. 2, 1999, http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp990737e, printed Jul. 14, 2009.
Fayet, P., et al., Commercialism of Plasma Deposited Barrier Coatings for Liquid Food Packaging, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1995, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 15-16.
Felts, J., Hollow Cathode Based Multi-Component Depositions, Vacuum Technology & Coating, Mar. 2004, pp. 48-55.
Felts, J.T., Thickness Effects on Thin Film Gas Barriers: Silicon-Based Coatings, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 99-104.
Felts, J.T., Transparent Barrier Coatings Update: Flexible Substrates, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 324-331.
Felts, J.T., Transparent Gas Barrier Technologies, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 184-193.
Finson, E., et al., Transparent SiO2 Barrier Coatings: Conversion and Production Status, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1994, ISBN 1-878068-13-X, pp. 139-143.
Flaherty, T. et al., Application of Spectral Reflectivity to the Measurement of Thin-Film Thickness, Opto-Ireland 2002: Optics and Photonics Technologies and Applications, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4876, 2003, pp. 976-983.
Hora, R., et al., Plasma Polymerization: A New Technology for Functional Coatings on Plastics, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 51-55.
Izu, M., et al., High Performance Clear CoatTM Barrier Film, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 333-340.
Jost, S., Plasma Polymerized Organosilicon Thin Films on Reflective Coatings, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 344-346.
Kaganowicz, G., et al., Plasma-Deposited Coatings—Properties and Applications, 23rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1980, pp. 24-30.
Kamineni, V. et al., Thickness Measurement of Thin Metal Films by Optical Metrology, College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University of Albany, Albany, NY.
Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E., et al., Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings Produced by Dual Frequency PECVD, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 445-449.
Krug, T., et al., New Developments in Transparent Barrier Coatings, 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1993, ISBN 1-878068-12-1, pp. 302-305.
Kuhr, M. et al., Multifunktionsbeschichtungen für innovative Applikationen von Kunststoff-Substraten, HiCotec Smart Coating Solutions.
Kulshreshtha, D.S., Specifications of a Spectroscopic Ellipsometer, Department of Physics & Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, Jan. 16, 2009.
Krug, T.G., Transparent Barriers for Food Packaging, 33rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1990, ISBN 1-878068-09-1, pp. 163-169.
Lee, K. et al., The Ellipsometric Measurements of a Curved Surface, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, No. 32, 2005, pp. L1015-L1018.
Lelait, L. et al., Microstructural Investigations of EBPVD Thermal Barrier Coatings, Journal De Physique IV, Colloque C9, supplément au Journal de Physique III, vol. 3, Dec. 1993, pp. 645-654.
Masso, J.D., Evaluation of Scratch Resistant and Antireflective Coatings for Plastic Lenses, 32nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1989, p. 237-240.
Misiano, C., et al., New Colourless Barrier Coatings (Oxygen & Water Vapor Transmission Rate) on Plastic Substrates, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 28-40.
Misiano, C., et al., Silicon Oxide Barrier Improvements on Plastic Substrate, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 105-112.
Mount, E., Measuring Pinhole Resistance of Packaging, Corotec Corporation website, http://www.convertingmagazine.com, printed Jul. 13, 2009.
Murray, L. et al., The Impact of Foil Pinholes and Flex Cracks on the Moisture and Oxygen Barrier of Flexible Packaging.
Nelson, R.J., et al., Double-Sided QLF® Coatings for Gas Barriers, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 34th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1991, ISBN 1-878068-10-5, pp. 113-117.
Nelson, R.J., Scale-Up of Plasma Deposited SiOx Gas Diffusion Barrier Coatings, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 75-78.
Novotny, V. J., Ultrafast Ellipsometric Mapping of Thin Films, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 37, No. 02A, Feb. 1994, pp. 187-188.
Rüger, M., Die Pulse Sind das Plus, PICVD-Beschichtungsverfahren.
Schultz, A. et al., Detection and Identification of Pinholes in Plasma-Polymerised Thin Film Barrier Coatings on Metal Foils, Surface & Coatings Technology 200, 2005, pp. 213-217.
Stchakovsky, M. et al., Characterization of Barrier Layers by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry for Packaging Applications, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Application Note, Spectroscopic Ellipsometry, SE 14, Nov. 2005.
Teboul, E., Thi-Film Metrology: Spectroscopic Ellipsometer Becomes Industrial Thin-Film Tool, LaserFocusWorld, http://www.laserfocusworld.com/display—article, printed Jul. 14, 2009.
Teyssedre, G. et al., Temperature Dependence of the Photoluminescence in Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Films, Polymer 42, 2001, pp. 8207-8216.
Tsung, L. et al., Development of Fast CCD Cameras for In-Situ Electron Microscopy, Microsc Microanal 14(Supp 2), 2008.
Wood, L. et al., A Comparison of SiO2 Barrier Coated Polypropylene to Other Coated Flexible Substrates, 35th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1992, ISBN 1-878068-11-3, pp. 59-62.
Yang, et al., Microstructure and tribological properties of SiOx/DLC films grown by PECVD, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 194, Issue 1, Apr. 20, 2005, pp. 128-135.
An 451, Accurate Thin Film Measurements by High-Resoluiton Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM), Evans Alalytical Group, Version 1.0, Jun. 12, 2008, pp. 1-2.
Benefits of TriboGlide, TriboGlide Silicone-Free Lubrication Systems, http://www.triboglide.com/benfits.htm, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in Application No. PCT/US2010/034576, dated Sep. 14, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in Application No. PCT/US2010/034568, dated Sep. 14, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, in Application No. PCT/US2011/036358, dated Sep. 9, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, in Application No. PCT/US2011/036340, dated Aug. 1, 2011.
MacDonald, Gareth, “West and Daikyo Seiko Launch Ready Pack”, http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Packaging/West-and-Daikyo-Seiko-launch-Ready-Pack, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Kumer, Vijai, “Development of Terminal Sterilization Cycle for Pre-Filled Cyclic Olefin Polymer (COP) Syringes”, http://abstracts.aapspharmaceutica.com/ExpoAAPS09/CC/forms/attendee/index.aspx?content=sessionInfo&sessionId=401, 1 page, retrieved from the internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Quinn, F.J., “Biotech Lights Up the Glass Packaging Picture”, http://www.pharmaceuticalcommerce.com/frontEnd/main.php?idSeccion=840, 4 pages, retrieved from the Internet Sep. 21, 2011.
Wen, Zai-Qing et al., Distribution of Silicone Oil in Prefilled Glass Syringes Probed with Optical and Spectroscopic Methods, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology 2009, 63, pp. 149-158.
ZebraSci—Intelligent Inspection Products, webpage, http://zebrasci.com/index.html, retrieved from the internet Sep. 30, 2011.
Google search re “cyclic olefin polymer resin” syringe OR vial, http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&lr=&source=hp&q=%22cyclic+olefin+polymer+resin%22+syringe+OR+vial&btnG=Search&pbx=1&oq=%22cyclic+olefin+polymer+resin%22+syringe+OR+vial&aq, 1 page, retrieved from the internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Taylor, Nick, “West to Add CZ Vials as Glass QC Issues Drive Interest”, ttp://twitter.com/WestPharma/status/98804071674281986, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet Sep. 22, 2011.
Silicone Oil Layer, Contract Testing, webpage, http://www.siliconization.com/downloads/siliconeoillayercontracttesting.pdf, retrieved from the internet Oct. 28, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2010/034577, dated Nov. 24, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2010/034582, dated Nov. 24, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2010/034586, dated Dec. 20, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2011/036097, dated Dec. 29, 2011.
“Oxford instruments plasmalab 80plus”, XP55015205, retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 20, 2011, URL:http://www.oxfordplasma.de/pdf—inst/plas—80.pdf.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2011/044215, dated Dec. 29, 2011.
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in Application No. 10 162 758.6, dated May 8, 2012.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in international application No. PCT/US2011/036097, dated Nov. 13, 2012.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority with International Search Report in Application No. PCT/US2012/064489, dated Jan. 25, 2013.
Danish Patent and Trademark Office, Singapore Written Opinion, in Application No. 201108308-6, dated Dec. 6, 2012.
Danish Patent and Trademark Office, Singapore Search Report, in Application No. 201108308-6, dated Dec. 12, 2012.
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reason(s) for Rejection in Patent application No. 2012-510983, dated Jan. 7, 2014. (6 pages).
Chinese Patent Office, Notification of the Second Office Action in Application No. 201080029190.0, dated Jan. 6, 2014. (26 pages).
Chinese Patent Office, Notification of the First Office Action in Application No. 201180023474.2, dated Dec. 23, 2013. (18 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/067852, dated Jan. 22, 2014. (9 pages).
Sahagian, Khoren; Larner, Mikki; Kaplan, Stephen L., “Altering Biological Interfaces with Gas Plasma: Example Applications”, Plasma Technology Systems, Belmont, CA, In SurFACTS in Biomaterials, Surfaces in Biomaterials Foundation, Summer 2013, 18(3), p. 1-5.
Daikyo Cyrystal Zenith Insert Needle Syringe System, West Delivering Innovative Services, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., 2010.
Daikyo Crystal Zenigh Syringes, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., www. WestPFSsolutions.com, #5659, 2011.
Zhang, Yongchao and Heller, Adam, Reduction of the Nonspecific Binding of a Target Antibody and of Its Enzyme-Labeled Detection Probe Enabling Electrochemical Immunoassay of Antibody through the 7 pg/mL-100 ng/mL (40 fM-400 pM) Range, Department of Chemical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Anal. Chem. 2005, 7, 7758-7762. (6 pages).
Principles and Applications of Liquid Scintillation Counting, LSC Concepts—Fundamentals of Liquid Scintillation Counting, National Diagnostics, 2004, pp. 1-15.
Chikkaveeraiah, Bhaskara V. and Rusling, Dr. James, Non Specific Binding (NSB) in Antigen-Antibody Assays, University of Connecticut, Spring 2007. (13 pages).
Sahagian, Khoren; Larner, Mikki; Kaplan, Stephen L., “Cold Gas Plasma in Surface Modification of Medical Plastics”, Plasma Technology Systems, Belmont, CA, Publication pending. Presented at SPE Antec Medical Plastics Division, Apr. 23, 2013, Ohio.
Lipman, Melissa, “Jury Orders Becton to Pay $114M in Syringe Antitrust Case”, © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc., Law360, New York (Sep. 20, 2013, 2:53 PM ET), http://www.law360.com/articles/474334/print?section=ip, [retrieved Sep. 23, 2013].
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence, page last modified Sep. 18, 2013 at 11:39. [retrieved on Oct. 8, 2013]. (5 pages).
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confocal—microscopy, page last modified Aug. 28, 2013 at 11:12. [retrieved on Oct. 8, 2013]. (4 pages).
Wang, Jun et al., “Fluorocarbon thin film with superhydrophobic property prepared by pyrolysis of hexafluoropropylene oxide”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 258, 2012, pp. 9782-9784 (4 pages).
Wang, Hong et al., “Ozone-Initiated Secondary Emission Rates of Aldehydes from Indoor surfaces in Four Homes”, American Chemical Society, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, No. 17, 2006, pp. 5263-5268 (6 pages).
Lewis, Hilton G. Pryce, et al., “HWCVD of Polymers: Commercialization and Scale-Up”, Thin Solid Films 517, 2009, pp. 3551-3554.
Wolgemuth, Lonny, “Challenges With Prefilled Syringes: The Parylene Solution”, Frederick Furness Publishing, www.ongrugdelivery.com, 2012, pp. 44-45.
History of Parylene (12 pages).
SCS Parylene HTX brochure, Stratamet Thin Film Corporation, Fremont, CA, 2012, retrieved from the Internet Feb. 13, 2013, http://www.stratametthinfilm.com/parylenes/htx. (2 pages).
SCS Parylene Properties, Specialty Coating Systems, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 2011. (12 pages).
Werthheimer, M.R., Studies of the earliest stages of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of SiO2 on polymeric substrates, Thin Solid Films 382 (2001) 1-3, and references therein, United States Pharmacopeia 34. In General Chapters <1>, 2001.
Gibbins, Bruce and Warner, Lenna, The Role of Antimicrobial Silver Nanotechnology, Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry, Aug. 205, pp. 2-6.
MTI CVD Tube Furnace w Gas Delivery & Vacuum Pump, http://mtixtl.com/MiniCVDTubeFurnace2ChannelsGasVacuum-OTF-1200X-S50-2F.aspx (2 pages).
Lab-Built HFPO CVD Coater, HFPO Decomp to Give Thin Fluorocarbon Films, Applied Surface Science 2012 258 (24)9782.
Technical Report No. 10, Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology, 42, Supplement 1988, Parenteral Formulation of Proteins and Peptides: Stability and Stabilizers, Parenteral Drug Association, 1988.
Technical Report No. 12, Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology, 42, Supplement 1988, Siliconization of Parenteral Drug Packaging Components, Parenteral Drug Association, 1988.
European Patent Office, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, in Application No. 10 162 760.2-1353, dated Oct. 25, 2013. (366 pages).
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difluorocarbene, page last modified Feb. 20, 2012 at 14:41. [retrieved on Sep. 7, 2012]. (4 pages).
O'Shaughnessy, W.S., et al., “Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition of a Siloxane Coating for Insulation of Neutral Probes”, Thin Solid Films 517 (2008) 3612-3614. (3 pages).
Denler, et al., Investigations of SiOx-polymer “interphases” by glancing angle RBS with Li+ and Be+ ions, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 208 (2003) 176-180, United States Pharmacopeia 34. In General Chapters <1>, 2003.
PCT, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Annex to Form PCT/ISA/206 Communication relating to the results of the partial international search in International application No. PCT/US2013/071750, dated Feb. 14, 2014. (6 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/62247, dated Dec. 20, 2013. (13 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/043642, dated Dec. 5, 2013. (21 pages).
Tao, Ran et al., Condensationand Polymerization of Supersaturated Monomer Vapor, ACS Publications, 2012 American Chemical Society, ex.doi.org/10.1021/la303462q/Langmuir 2012, 28, 16580-16587.
State Intellectual Property Office of Teh People's Republic of China, Notification of First Office Action in Application No. 201080029201.4, dated Mar. 37, 2013. (15 pages).
Coating Syringes, http://www.triboglide.com/syringes.htm, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Coating/Production Process, http://www.triboglide.com/process.htm, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Munich Exp, Materialica 2005: Fundierte Einblicke in den Werkstofsektor, Seite 1, von 4, ME095-6.
Schott Developing Syringe Production in United States, Apr. 14, 2009, http://www.schott.com/pharmaceutical—packaging, printed Aug. 31, 2009.
Sterile Prefillable Glass and Polymer Syringes, Schott forma vitrum, http://www.schott.com/pharmaceutical—packaging.
Transparent und recyclingfähig, neue verpackung, Dec. 2002, pp. 54-57.
European Patent Office, Communication with European Search Report, in Application No. 10162758.6, dated Aug. 19, 2010.
Griesser, Hans J., et al., Elimination of Stick-Slip of Elastomeric Sutures by Radiofrequency Glow Discharge Deposited Coatings, Biomed Mater. Res. Appl Biomater, 2000, vol. 53, 235-243, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162761.0, dated Feb. 10, 2011.
European Patent Office, Communication with partial Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162758.6, dated Aug. 19, 2010.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162758.6, dated Dec. 21, 2010.
Yang, et al., Microstructure and tribological properties of SiOx/DLC films grown by PECVD, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 194 (2005), Apr. 20, 2005, pp. 128-135.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended European search report, in Application No. EP10162756.0, dated Nov. 17, 2010.
Prasad, G.R. et al., “Biocompatible Coatings with Silicon and Titanium Oxides Deposited by PECVD”, 3rd Mikkeli International Industrial Coating Seminar, Mikkeli, Finland, Mar. 16-18, 2006.
European Patent Office, Communication with extended European search report, in Application No. EP10162757.8, dated Nov. 10, 2010.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034568, dated Jan. 21, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034571, dated Jan. 26, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034576, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034577, dated Jan. 21, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in PCT/US2010/034582, dated Jan. 24, 2011.
European Patent Office, Communication with Extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162755.2, dated Nov. 9, 2010.
European Patent Office, Communication with Extended Search Report, in Application No. EP 10162760.2, dated Nov. 12, 2010.
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority with International Search Report in Application No. PCT/US2010/034586, dated Mar. 15, 2011.
Shimojima, Atsushi et al., Structure and Properties of Multilayered Siloxane-Organic Hybrid Films Prepared Using Long-Chain Organotrialkoxysilanes Containing C=C Double Bonds, Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2007, vol. 17, pp. 658-663, © The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007.
Sone, Hayato et al., Picogram Mass Sensor Using Resonance Frequency Shift of Cantilever, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, No. 6A, 2004, pp. 3648-3651, © The Japan Society of Applied Physics.
Sone, Hayato et al., Femtogram Mass Sensor Using Self-Sensing Cantilever for Allergy Check, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 45, No. 3B, 2006, pp. 2301-2304, © The Japan Society of Applied Physics.
Mallikarjunan, Anupama et al, The Effect of Interfacial Chemistry on Metal Ion Penetration into Polymeric Films, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 734, 2003, © Materials Research Society.
Schonher, H., et al., Friction and Surface Dynamics of Polymers on the Nanoscale by AFM, STM and AFM Studies on (Bio)molecular Systems: Unravelling the Nanoworld. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2008, vol. 285, pp. 103-156, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Lang, H.P., Gerber, C., Microcantilever Sensors, STM and AFM Studies on (Bio)molecular Systems: Unravelling the Nanoworld. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2008, vol. 285, pp. 1-28, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Arganguren, Mirta I., Macosko, Christopher W., Thakkar, Bimal, and Tirrel, Matthew, “Interfacial Interactions in Silica Reinforced Silicones,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 170, 1990, pp. 303-308.
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2014/029531, dated Jun. 20, 2014 (12 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the Third Office Action, with translation, in Application No. 201080029199.0, dated Jun. 27, 2014 (19 pages).
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, Invitation to Respond to Written Opinion, in Application No. 2012083077, dated Jun. 30, 2014 (12 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/US13/40368, dated Jul. 16, 2014 (6 pages).
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the Third Office Action, in Application No. 201080029201.4, dated Jul. 7, 2014 (15 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2011252925, dated Sep. 6, 2013 (3 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/040380, dated Sep. 3, 2013. (13 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/040368, dated Oct. 21, 2013. (21 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2013/048709, dated Oct. 2, 2013. (7 pages).
Coclite A.M. et al., “On the relationship between the structure and the barrier performance of plasma deposited silicon dioxide-like films”, Surface and Coatings Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 204, No. 24, Sep. 15, 2010, pp. 4012-4017, XPO27113381, ISSN: 0257-8972 [retrieved on Jun. 16, 2010] abstract, p. 4014, right-hand column-p. 4015, figures 2, 3.
Brunet-Bruneau A. et al., “Microstructural characterization of ion assisted Sio2 thin films by visible and infrared ellipsometry”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology: Part A, AVS/AIP, Melville, NY, US, vol. 16, No. 4, Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 2281-2286, XPO12004127, ISSN: 0734-2101, DOI: 10.1116/1.581341, p. 2283, right-hand column-p. 2284, left-hand column, figures 2, 4.
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/048709, dated Sep. 30, 2014 (4 pages).
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/048709, dated Oct. 15, 2014 (7 pages).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/064121, dated Nov. 19, 2014 (8 pages).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/USUS13/064121, dated Nov. 21, 2014 (7 pages).
Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia, Substantive Examintion Adverse Report (section 30(1)/30(2)), in Application No. PI 2011005486, dated Oct. 31, 2014 (3 pages).
Patent Office of the Russian Federation, Official Action, in Application No. 2011150499, dated Sep. 25, 2014 (4 pages).
Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Indutrial, Official Action, in Appilcation No. MX/a/2012/013129, dated Sep. 22, 2014 (5 pages).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in international application No. PCT/US2010/034571, dated Jun. 13, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in international application No. PCT/US2010/034586, dated Aug. 23, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Preliminary Examining Authority, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in international application No. PCT/US2010/034568, dated May 30, 2011.
Hanlon, Adriene Lepiane, Pak, Chung K., Pawlikowski, Beverly A., Decision on Appeal, Appeal No. 2005-1693, U.S. Appl. No. 10/192,333, dated Sep. 30, 2005.
Australian Government, Patent Examination Report No. 2 in Application No. 2010249031 dated Apr. 21, 2015.
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal in application No. 2013-510276, dated Mar. 31, 2015.
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/US2013/071750, dated Jan. 20, 2015 (9 pages).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, in International application No. PCT/US2013/064121, dated Nov. 21, 2014 (7 pages).
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Rejection in Application No. 2012-510983, dated Jan. 20, 2015 (4 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2010249033, dated Dec. 19, 2014 (7 pages).
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 1, in Application No. 2011252925, dated Dec. 2, 2014 (3 pages).
Reh, et al., Evaluation of stationary phases for 2-dimensional HPLC of Proteins—Validation of commercial RP-columns, Published by Elsevier B.V., 2000.
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the Fourth Office Action in Application No. 201080029199.0, dated Mar. 18, 2015 (15 pages).
Hlobik, Plastic Pre-Fillable Syringe Systems (http://www.healthcarepackaging.com/package-type/Containers/plastic-prefillablesyringe-systems, Jun. 8, 2010).
PCT, Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority, International application No. PCT/SU2013/071752, dated May 6, 2015.
Hopwood J Ed—CRC Press: “Plasma-assisted deposition”, Aug. 17, 1997, Handbook of Nanophase Materials, Chapter 6, pp. 141-197, XP008107730, ISBN: 978-0-8247-9469-9.
Bose, Sagarika and Constable, Kevin, Advanced Delivery Devices, Design & Evaluation of a Polymer-Based Prefillable Syringe for Biopharmaceuticals With Improved Functionality & Performance, JR Automation Technologies, May 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120252709 A1 Oct 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61471056 Apr 2011 US