The present disclosure is related to a voltage waveform generator for a plasma processing apparatus, and to a related method of generating a voltage waveform for use in plasma processing, in particular a voltage waveform for producing a voltage bias on a substrate to be plasma processed.
In plasma assisted etching and plasma assisted layer deposition radio frequency (RF) generators are used to generate a bias voltage for controlling the ion energy. To improve process control, accurate control of the bias voltage and the resulting ion energy distribution (IED) is of importance. Generating this bias voltage is done with limited efficiency (wideband) linear amplifiers or with limited flexibility (narrowband) switch-mode amplifiers or dedicated pulse generating amplifiers. Most amplifiers are only indirectly controlling the output voltage waveform (e.g. controlling output power or relying on calibration), resulting in limited performance (the generated waveform is less close to the desired output voltage waveform), resulting in a less desired ion energy distribution and limited reproducibility (wafer to wafer variation and system to system variation).
U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,992 describes a plasma processing apparatus comprising a switch mode power supply for forming a periodic voltage function at an exposed surface of the substrate to be processed. The periodic voltage function effectuates a desired ion energy intensity distribution to perform etching of the substrate or plasma deposition on the substrate.
The above switch mode power supply can generate a waveform of particular shape with a DC current to compensate for the ion current (see FIG. 14 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,992). To do so, the switch mode power supply comprises two switch components that are coupled in a half-bridge and are controlled based on drive signals generated by a controller as shown in FIG. 3; of U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,992. With such a waveform, the reactor capacitance and stray inductance experience commutation resulting in losses. The relation between system parameters and the commutation (or switching) losses P can be expressed as:
PREACTOR COMMUTATION∝CREACTOR·VCOMMUTATION·fCOMMUTATION
Typical ranges for the parameters are:
Depending on the process conditions and reactor design, this can result in losses over 500 W.
In current plasma processes, there is a tendency towards higher commutation voltage levels, larger reactors sizes, with higher capacitance CREACTOR Using the prior art waveform generator would thus entail even higher losses, which is unacceptable.
In addition, a plasma reactor has an inherent reactor capacitance and the interconnection between reactor and bias voltage generator a stray inductance, which form a LC circuit having an inherent resonance characteristic. Due to the resonance in the system, slow switching speeds (limited dV/dt on the switch node) or a damping resistance (or snubber) are mandatory to prevent excitation of the resonance which would cause undesired ringing of the substrate voltage. This ringing would result in an undesired voltage on the substrate, which has a negative influence on the desired IED. Such slow switching speed results in long discharge time periods effectively reducing the process/discharge ratio, which in turn results in a longer time to process the substrate. A too long discharge time can additionally have a negative influence on the sheath formation or preservation of the sheath. However, a damping resistance (or snubber) would cause additional undesired losses.
It is an aim of the present disclosure to overcome the above drawbacks. It is an aim of the present disclosure to provide a voltage waveform generator for use in plasma processing and related method of generating a voltage waveform, which allows for obtaining higher efficiency. It is an aim to provide such generator and method allowing for increasing process throughput with no or limited efficiency loss.
It is an aim of the present disclosure to provide plasma processing apparatuses and related methods that allow for an improved process control. In particular, it is an aim to provide such apparatuses and methods that enable to approach the ideal or desired voltage waveform more precisely and/or which allow for faster convergence to such ideal waveform.
According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method of generating a voltage waveform for use in plasma processing. The voltage waveform is advantageously a periodic bias voltage that is applied to an exposed surface of a substrate undergoing plasma processing, such as plasma assisted etching, plasma assisted layer deposition, or Reactive Ion Etching (REI).
According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a voltage waveform generator for a plasma processing apparatus. The voltage waveform generator is advantageously configured to generate a periodic bias voltage to be applied to a substrate that is subjected to plasma processing. The voltage waveform generator is advantageously configured to implement the method according to the first aspect.
According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a plasma processing apparatus, comprising the voltage waveform generator of the second aspect.
The voltage waveform generator according to the present disclosure comprises a power stage topology allowing generation of a periodic bias voltage, e.g. for use in a plasma processing apparatus. The power stage topology comprises different voltage levels which can consecutively be coupled to the output for obtaining the periodic bias voltage. The number of voltage levels is such that resonant commutation during a change of voltage levels of the waveform can be obtained, resulting in fast and lossless commutation. Furthermore, advantageously, through appropriate control of the timing of the switches that apply the different voltage levels, and through appropriate selection of the voltage levels, it can be obtained that at the end of the commutation (discharge) period, the desired substrate voltage level is reached, which is advantageously substantially equal to the generator output voltage, and the current though the stray inductance of the interconnection between the generator and the substrate is approximately 0 A. As a result, there is no ringing in the system, obviating the need to implement damping or slow commutation. The lossless commutation allows for generating the bias voltage in a highly efficient manner. The fast commutation reduces the disturbance of the sheath during the discharge period. This results in better process control. The fast commutation makes it possible to further narrow down the IED. A narrow IED is critical for process control.
According to another aspect, a method of controlling or operating a plasma processing apparatus is described herein.
Aspects of the present disclosure will now be described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, wherein same reference numerals illustrate same features and wherein:
The BVG 10 can also be used in other configurations like a Capacitively Coupled Plasma (CCP) reactor, or with a direct inter connection (not via the system host) of control signals between a source power generator (RF power supply) and BVG. A different source can be used to generate the plasma (e.g. Capacitively Coupled Plasma, Electron Cyclotron Resonance, Magnetron, DC voltage, etc.).
A DC (bias) voltage over the sheath ideally results in a narrow IED, with the level of the DC voltage controlling the level of the (average) ion energy. There is a charge build up on dielectric substrates and/or substage stages of dielectric material (e.g. electrostatic chuck holders) caused by the positively charged ions that are collected on the surface. This charge build up on the substrate and/or substrate stage needs to be compensated for to keep the voltage potential over the sheath (and therefore the ion energy) constant. The charge build up and therefore the potential over the substrate and/or substrate stage needs to be limited to prevent damage of the substrate and/or substrate stage. This compensation can be achieved by a periodic discharge of the substrate and/or substrate stage during a discharge period TD between consecutive process periods TP as shown in
According to the present disclosure, the drawbacks of the prior art relating to excessive commutation losses and uncontrolled resonance ringing are remedied by implementing a particular commutation in the power stage 11 of the BVG 10, referred to as resonant commutation. Referring to
Closing both switches SW2 and SW5 connects ground terminal 13 to the output node 14. The output node is connected to the output terminal 12 of the BVG 10, which in turn can be coupled to the substrate stage 105. DC blocking capacitor C1 can optionally be coupled between the output node 14 and the output terminal 12.
In addition, power stage 11 comprises a third DC power supply, and a fourth DC power supply, both being implemented as voltage sources 31, 41 respectively and configured to output DC voltages of a third magnitude V3 and a fourth magnitude V4, respectively. DC voltage source 31 and 41 are connected to the output node 14 through respective third and fourth switches SW3, SW4. The interconnection lines between voltage sources 31 and 41 and output node 14 can advantageously comprise diodes D3 and D4 respectively to allow current in one direction only. All the voltage sources 21-41 are parallel connected to output node 14.
A simplified model of the load as seen by the output node 14 is shown in
Referring to
According to the present disclosure, the additional DC voltage sources 31 and 41 allow for reducing or eliminating commutation losses and resonance ringing during or after commutation when obtaining a desired bias voltage waveform. Referring to
Advantageously, the waveform VP can include at least three distinct voltage levels: a first positive voltage of magnitude V1, which is advantageously supplied by voltage source 21, a second negative voltage of magnitude V5, obtained by ramping down the voltage when connecting current source 51 to the load, and ground potential V0. The voltage waveform generator 10 according to the present disclosure advantageously allows for obtaining such waveform by using the additional voltage sources 31 and 41 to provide for intermediate voltage levels V3 and V4 in the waveform VP for effecting the voltage rise towards V1 on the one hand, and the voltage drop to ground potential V0, or even to V5, on the other. These additional (intermediate) voltage levels, allow for avoiding undesired voltage oscillation following a commutation event by using an appropriate switching timing between the different voltage levels.
By way of example, and still referring to
To start a new processing period TP following the substrate discharge period TD, VS is made negative again. To do so, switch SW1 and advantageously also SW4 are opened, e.g. at time T2, and somewhat later, at T3, switch SW3 is closed causing the voltage VP to fall to the magnitude V3 of voltage source 31, until switch SW2 is closed at time T4 connecting the output node to ground potential (causing a (further) drop of VP) since switch SW5 remains closed until a later time T5. This marks the beginning of the processing period TP. The magnitudes V3, V4 and V1 are advantageously maintained constant during closure of the respective switches, and the magnitude may be continuously constant throughout operation.
At T5, SW5 is opened while SW2 is kept closed. This causes the output node 14 to be connected to the current source 51 and current I2 will effect a voltage ramp down of VP advantageously allowing to maintain the substrate voltage VS at a constant level, by compensating for the charge build up on the substrate and/or substrate stage. Just prior to starting a new discharge period, bypass switch SW5 is closed at time T7, advantageously somewhat after opening switch SW2 at time T6.
Switch SW3 can be opened at some time past T4 and possibly even past T5 due to diode D3. Note that there is advantageously no dead time required between SW4 and SW1 (due to diode D4) and between SW3 and SW2 (due to diode D3). The dead time T3−T2 is required to prevent short circuiting of V1 and V3.
The power stage 11 as described herein allows to be operated (by generating appropriate switching control signals for switches SW1-SW5) in such a way to minimize the oscillations on the output and to prevent parasitic resonance in the system. To this end, the power stage is advantageously operated such that the current through L1 is brought to 0 A at the end of a commutation period. In the waveform of
To ensure that the current through L1 can be brought to 0 A at end of a commutation period, in particular at T4, and advantageously also at T1, the instants T1 and T4 in which the switches SW1 respectively SW2 are closed (or equivalently the switching intervals T1−T0 and T4−T3), are advantageously appropriately selected. If the switch (SW1 or SW2) closes too late, an oscillation between L1 and the voltage VP on the output node 14 is induced due to a capacitance on the output node 14 and the fact that the voltage on this capacitance is not equal to the voltage on C4. If the switch (SW1 or SW2) closes too early the current through L1 is not 0 A and this will cause a ringing between L1 and C4. The criticality of selecting the appropriate switching time is shown in
As can be seen from
In addition to the above, oscillation is advantageously prevented by appropriate selection of the voltage level applied during a commutation period (V3 respectively V4). The voltage level advantageously falls between the voltage level at commutation start (instants T0 and T3 respectively) and the voltage level at commutation end (instants T1 and T4 respectively). It can be shown that an optimal voltage level of V3 and V4 equals (VEND COMMUTATION+VSTART COMMUTATION)/2. In other words, an optimal magnitude of V3 is the average of VP at T0 and T1. An optimal magnitude of V4 is the average of VP at T3 and T4.
When the load of the BVG 10 as seen at output node 14 can be modeled as a series LC circuit with reactor inductance L1 and total capacitance C4 as shown in
In the above it is assumed that all components, e.g. switches, diodes, and the lumped model of the plasma reactor are ideal and lossless. Since this will not correspond to a real situation, the commutation parameters can be further adapted to take non-ideal situations into account. One may start operation based on the values for the commutation parameters (commutation time, commutation voltage) as determined above. During operation, one or more of these commutation parameters are advantageously adapted by implementing an appropriate process control, e.g. through a closed loop control algorithm, e.g. based on current feedback. Referring to
Controller 16 advantageously comprises a feedback control loop, advantageously a current feedback control loop 164. Current control loop 164 comprises a current sensor 165 configured to measure the current output by the power stage 11. Current sensor 165 can be arranged at output node 14. Controller 16 can comprise a first input 167 coupled to current control loop 164, which is configured to feed the value of the output current measured by current sensor 165 to the controller 16. Through a second input 166, controller 16 can be configured to receive setpoints for one or more of the switch control signals 161, the voltage setpoints 162 and the current setpoint 163. These setpoints can be received from a system host controller or user interface, which may be configured to determine the setpoints based on a model of the load of the BVG 10, e.g. as determined in the previous paragraphs. Controller 16 may be configured to adjust the setpoints, in particular switch control signals 161 and/or voltage setpoints 162, based on the input 167 fed back from the current sensor 165.
Referring to
The diagram of
Referring to
Referring to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2022999 | Apr 2019 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/061088 | 4/21/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/216741 | 10/29/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9208992 | Brouk | Dec 2015 | B2 |
10607813 | Fairbairn | Mar 2020 | B2 |
11264209 | Van Zyl | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11670487 | Nguyen | Jun 2023 | B1 |
20120081350 | Sano | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120228263 | Ui et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140062303 | Hoffman | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20180032100 | Kim et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180226225 | Koh et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20220020567 | Koshimizu | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0987818 | Mar 2000 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from the European Receiving Office in PCT/EP2020/061088, dated Jul. 3, 2020, which is an international application corresponding to this U.S. application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220223377 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |