Voltage waveform generator for plasma processing apparatuses

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11875972
  • Patent Number
    11,875,972
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 21, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 16, 2024
    4 months ago
Abstract
Methods and devices for generating a voltage waveform at an output may include providing four DC voltages of different magnitudes. The first (V1) magnitude is higher than the third (V3) and fourth (V4) magnitude. The fourth DC voltage is coupled to the output followed by coupling the first DC voltage to the output, to bring an output voltage (VP) at the output to a high level. The first DC voltage is decoupled from the output, followed by coupling the third DC voltage to the output, to obtain a drop of the output voltage (VP). A ground potential (V0) is coupled to the output following coupling the third DC voltage and the second DC current (I2) is coupled to the output following coupling the ground potential, wherein the second DC current ramps down the output voltage (VP).
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure is related to a voltage waveform generator for a plasma processing apparatus, and to a related method of generating a voltage waveform for use in plasma processing, in particular a voltage waveform for producing a voltage bias on a substrate to be plasma processed.


INTRODUCTION

In plasma assisted etching and plasma assisted layer deposition radio frequency (RF) generators are used to generate a bias voltage for controlling the ion energy. To improve process control, accurate control of the bias voltage and the resulting ion energy distribution (IED) is of importance. Generating this bias voltage is done with limited efficiency (wideband) linear amplifiers or with limited flexibility (narrowband) switch-mode amplifiers or dedicated pulse generating amplifiers. Most amplifiers are only indirectly controlling the output voltage waveform (e.g. controlling output power or relying on calibration), resulting in limited performance (the generated waveform is less close to the desired output voltage waveform), resulting in a less desired ion energy distribution and limited reproducibility (wafer to wafer variation and system to system variation).


U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,992 describes a plasma processing apparatus comprising a switch mode power supply for forming a periodic voltage function at an exposed surface of the substrate to be processed. The periodic voltage function effectuates a desired ion energy intensity distribution to perform etching of the substrate or plasma deposition on the substrate.


The above switch mode power supply can generate a waveform of particular shape with a DC current to compensate for the ion current (see FIG. 14 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,992). To do so, the switch mode power supply comprises two switch components that are coupled in a half-bridge and are controlled based on drive signals generated by a controller as shown in FIG. 3; of U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,992. With such a waveform, the reactor capacitance and stray inductance experience commutation resulting in losses. The relation between system parameters and the commutation (or switching) losses P can be expressed as:

PREACTOR COMMUTATION∝CREACTOR·VCOMMUTATION·fCOMMUTATION


Typical ranges for the parameters are:

    • CREACTOR: 500 pF to 10 nF,
    • VCOMMUTATION: 10 V to 2 kV,
    • fCOMMUTATION: 20 kHz to 1 MHz.


Depending on the process conditions and reactor design, this can result in losses over 500 W.


In current plasma processes, there is a tendency towards higher commutation voltage levels, larger reactors sizes, with higher capacitance CREACTOR Using the prior art waveform generator would thus entail even higher losses, which is unacceptable.


In addition, a plasma reactor has an inherent reactor capacitance and the interconnection between reactor and bias voltage generator a stray inductance, which form a LC circuit having an inherent resonance characteristic. Due to the resonance in the system, slow switching speeds (limited dV/dt on the switch node) or a damping resistance (or snubber) are mandatory to prevent excitation of the resonance which would cause undesired ringing of the substrate voltage. This ringing would result in an undesired voltage on the substrate, which has a negative influence on the desired IED. Such slow switching speed results in long discharge time periods effectively reducing the process/discharge ratio, which in turn results in a longer time to process the substrate. A too long discharge time can additionally have a negative influence on the sheath formation or preservation of the sheath. However, a damping resistance (or snubber) would cause additional undesired losses.


SUMMARY

It is an aim of the present disclosure to overcome the above drawbacks. It is an aim of the present disclosure to provide a voltage waveform generator for use in plasma processing and related method of generating a voltage waveform, which allows for obtaining higher efficiency. It is an aim to provide such generator and method allowing for increasing process throughput with no or limited efficiency loss.


It is an aim of the present disclosure to provide plasma processing apparatuses and related methods that allow for an improved process control. In particular, it is an aim to provide such apparatuses and methods that enable to approach the ideal or desired voltage waveform more precisely and/or which allow for faster convergence to such ideal waveform.


According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method of generating a voltage waveform for use in plasma processing. The voltage waveform is advantageously a periodic bias voltage that is applied to an exposed surface of a substrate undergoing plasma processing, such as plasma assisted etching, plasma assisted layer deposition, or Reactive Ion Etching (REI).


According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a voltage waveform generator for a plasma processing apparatus. The voltage waveform generator is advantageously configured to generate a periodic bias voltage to be applied to a substrate that is subjected to plasma processing. The voltage waveform generator is advantageously configured to implement the method according to the first aspect.


According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a plasma processing apparatus, comprising the voltage waveform generator of the second aspect.


The voltage waveform generator according to the present disclosure comprises a power stage topology allowing generation of a periodic bias voltage, e.g. for use in a plasma processing apparatus. The power stage topology comprises different voltage levels which can consecutively be coupled to the output for obtaining the periodic bias voltage. The number of voltage levels is such that resonant commutation during a change of voltage levels of the waveform can be obtained, resulting in fast and lossless commutation. Furthermore, advantageously, through appropriate control of the timing of the switches that apply the different voltage levels, and through appropriate selection of the voltage levels, it can be obtained that at the end of the commutation (discharge) period, the desired substrate voltage level is reached, which is advantageously substantially equal to the generator output voltage, and the current though the stray inductance of the interconnection between the generator and the substrate is approximately 0 A. As a result, there is no ringing in the system, obviating the need to implement damping or slow commutation. The lossless commutation allows for generating the bias voltage in a highly efficient manner. The fast commutation reduces the disturbance of the sheath during the discharge period. This results in better process control. The fast commutation makes it possible to further narrow down the IED. A narrow IED is critical for process control.


According to another aspect, a method of controlling or operating a plasma processing apparatus is described herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Aspects of the present disclosure will now be described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, wherein same reference numerals illustrate same features and wherein:



FIG. 1 represents an example of a voltage waveform generator used as bias generator for an ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma) reactor according to aspects of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 represents a simplified reactor plasma model and the voltage waveform generator according to the present disclosure coupled to it;



FIG. 3 represents (periodic) voltage waveforms (not drawn to scale) that can be applied to the nodes indicated in FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 represents a voltage waveform generator according to a first embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 5 represents the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 4, with a simplified model of the load coupled to the power stage of the voltage waveform generator;



FIG. 6 represents a possible switch implementation of the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 4, with N-channel MOSFETs;



FIG. 7 represents the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 4, in which the DC current source has been implemented with a DC voltage source and coupled inductor, and optionally a transient voltage suppressor (TVS);



FIG. 8 represents a graph showing the relation between the power stage voltage levels and the switch control signals for the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 4;



FIG. 9 represents schematically a closed loop control implementation of the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 4;



FIG. 10 represents the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 4 with added commutation inductances;



FIG. 11 represents a graph showing voltage and current levels during a commutation according to aspects of the present disclosure with switch slew-rate;



FIG. 12 represents a graph showing voltage and current levels during a non-optimal commutation with switch slew-rate;



FIG. 13 represents a voltage waveform generator as in FIG. 4 including an overvoltage protection circuit;



FIG. 14 represents a first implementation example of the overvoltage protection circuit of FIG. 13;



FIG. 15 represents a second implementation example of the overvoltage protection circuit of FIG. 13;



FIG. 16 represents a voltage waveform generator according to a second embodiment of the present disclosure, with a continuous current source;



FIG. 17 represents a possible switch implementation of the voltage waveform generator of FIG. 16, with N-channel MOSFETs.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows one of the typical usages of a bias voltage waveform generator (BVG) 10 in an Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) apparatus 100, where the BVG 10 is controlling the substrate 101 (typically a wafer) voltage by controlling the substrate stage voltage. In a plasma reactor 102, a plasma 103 is generated by introduction of a plasma forming gas 104 in a dielectric tube 108 surrounded by an induction coil 107. The arrangement forms a plasma torch which directs the plasma 103 towards a platform 105 (substrate stage) on which the substrate 101 is positioned. Optionally, a precursor 109 can be introduced in the plasma reactor 102. A RF voltage is applied to the induction coil 107 through a RF power supply 120, and a matching network 121 as known in the art. The RF power supply 120, as well as the BVG 10 can be controlled through a system host controller 130. Plasma processes suitable for the present disclosure are so called low or reduced pressure plasma, i.e. operating at a pressure significantly below atmospheric pressure, e.g. between 1 mTorr and 10 Torr. To this end, the plasma reactor 102 is advantageously airtight and the desired pressure in plasma reactor 102 is obtained through a vacuum pump 106.


The BVG 10 can also be used in other configurations like a Capacitively Coupled Plasma (CCP) reactor, or with a direct inter connection (not via the system host) of control signals between a source power generator (RF power supply) and BVG. A different source can be used to generate the plasma (e.g. Capacitively Coupled Plasma, Electron Cyclotron Resonance, Magnetron, DC voltage, etc.).



FIG. 2 represents a (highly) simplified electrical model of a plasma reactor, showing the load posed by the reactor and the plasma on the BVG 10 so as to explain the operation of the BVG 10. BVG 10 comprises a power stage 11 which is coupled to the output terminal 12 of the BVG 10 through an optional physical capacitor C1 to prevent DC current from the voltage induced on the surface of the substrate 101, or from the voltage of an electronic chuck from flowing through the power stage 11. The power stage 11 is configured to generate a bias voltage which is applied at output terminal 12. The DC component of this bias voltage is self-biasing due to C1, e.g. the voltage is set due to the difference in ion and electron mobility in the sheath. The plasma reactor can be modeled as shown in FIG. 2, although more or less complex models can be used as well. L1 is a lumped inductance representing the inductance caused by the BVG output power interconnection and return path. C2 is a lumped capacitance representing the capacitance from the substrate stage 105 and substrate stage power interconnection to earth. This capacitance is usually dominated by the capacitance from the substrate table to the dark shield, i.e. a metal shield adjacent the platform 105 preventing the plasma to propagate beyond the platform, e.g. into pump 106. C3 is the combined capacitance of the dielectric substrate and/or substage stage of dielectric material (e.g. due to the electrostatic chuck holder on/in the substrate stage). RP Represents the sheath impedance, caused by the limited ion mobility in the sheath, during the process period. DP Represents the high electron mobility in the sheath, during the discharge period. VPL is the plasma potential at the sheath above the substrate.


A DC (bias) voltage over the sheath ideally results in a narrow IED, with the level of the DC voltage controlling the level of the (average) ion energy. There is a charge build up on dielectric substrates and/or substage stages of dielectric material (e.g. electrostatic chuck holders) caused by the positively charged ions that are collected on the surface. This charge build up on the substrate and/or substrate stage needs to be compensated for to keep the voltage potential over the sheath (and therefore the ion energy) constant. The charge build up and therefore the potential over the substrate and/or substrate stage needs to be limited to prevent damage of the substrate and/or substrate stage. This compensation can be achieved by a periodic discharge of the substrate and/or substrate stage during a discharge period TD between consecutive process periods TP as shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 shows an ideal periodic voltage waveform VP to be generated by the BVG, so as to obtain an ideal voltage waveform VS on the exposed surface of the substrate. The nodes VP, VT, VS in which the waveforms are evaluated are shown in FIG. 2, where VP represents the voltage output by the power stage 11, VT the voltage at the substrate stage (table) 105, and VS the substrate voltage, i.e. the voltage on the exposed surface of the substrate 101. Typical values for the discharge period TD can be on the order of 500 ns. Typical values for the processing period TP can be on the order of 10 μs.


According to the present disclosure, the drawbacks of the prior art relating to excessive commutation losses and uncontrolled resonance ringing are remedied by implementing a particular commutation in the power stage 11 of the BVG 10, referred to as resonant commutation. Referring to FIG. 4, to make resonant commutation possible, the power stage 11 comprises a first DC power supply, implemented as a voltage source 21 configured to output a DC voltage of a first magnitude V1. DC voltage source 21 is connected to an output node 14 of the power stage 11 through a first switch SW1. The power stage 11 further comprises a second DC power supply, implemented as a current source 51 configured to output a DC current of a second magnitude I2, and a ground terminal 13 providing earth potential. In the present embodiment, DC current source 51 is connected to output node 14 through a second switch SW2. The ground terminal 13 is connected to an intermediate node 15 between the current source 51 and the second switch SW2 through a bypass switch SW5.


Closing both switches SW2 and SW5 connects ground terminal 13 to the output node 14. The output node is connected to the output terminal 12 of the BVG 10, which in turn can be coupled to the substrate stage 105. DC blocking capacitor C1 can optionally be coupled between the output node 14 and the output terminal 12.


In addition, power stage 11 comprises a third DC power supply, and a fourth DC power supply, both being implemented as voltage sources 31, 41 respectively and configured to output DC voltages of a third magnitude V3 and a fourth magnitude V4, respectively. DC voltage source 31 and 41 are connected to the output node 14 through respective third and fourth switches SW3, SW4. The interconnection lines between voltage sources 31 and 41 and output node 14 can advantageously comprise diodes D3 and D4 respectively to allow current in one direction only. All the voltage sources 21-41 are parallel connected to output node 14.


A simplified model of the load as seen by the output node 14 is shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 6 shows a possible implementation of switches SW1 through SW5 using N-channel MOSFETs.


Referring to FIG. 7, the DC current source 51 can alternatively be implemented using a DC voltage source 52 in series with an inductor 53 typically having a large inductance, e.g. 0.5 mH or more. A transient voltage suppressor 54 is advantageously placed over SW5 to provide a continuous current path for inductor 53, and to limit the voltage over SW5. Other alternative implementations use a power amplifier generating a variable DC current, e.g. for compensation of dielectric constant change due to voltage biasing. Likewise, alternative implementations of voltage sources 21, 31 and 41 are possible, e.g. based on a current source with capacitor connected between current source output and ground. It is alternatively possible to connect the low voltage side of voltage source 41 (connected to ground in FIG. 7) to the low voltage side of voltage source 52. This allows to use only voltage sources providing positive voltages.


According to the present disclosure, the additional DC voltage sources 31 and 41 allow for reducing or eliminating commutation losses and resonance ringing during or after commutation when obtaining a desired bias voltage waveform. Referring to FIG. 8, the switches SW1 through SW5 can be operated using control signals following the sequence shown. To obtain the desired periodic voltage waveform VS at the substrate 101, the BVG 10 will need to output a voltage waveform VP at the output node 14, depending on the modeled load (see e.g. FIG. 2). VP can comprise a positive voltage peak to obtain a substrate discharge, followed by a voltage drop and ramp down during a processing time of the substrate.


Advantageously, the waveform VP can include at least three distinct voltage levels: a first positive voltage of magnitude V1, which is advantageously supplied by voltage source 21, a second negative voltage of magnitude V5, obtained by ramping down the voltage when connecting current source 51 to the load, and ground potential V0. The voltage waveform generator 10 according to the present disclosure advantageously allows for obtaining such waveform by using the additional voltage sources 31 and 41 to provide for intermediate voltage levels V3 and V4 in the waveform VP for effecting the voltage rise towards V1 on the one hand, and the voltage drop to ground potential V0, or even to V5, on the other. These additional (intermediate) voltage levels, allow for avoiding undesired voltage oscillation following a commutation event by using an appropriate switching timing between the different voltage levels.


By way of example, and still referring to FIG. 8, starting at time T0, a substrate discharge period TD is started in which the substrate voltage VS is brought to a positive value. To this end, switch SW4 is closed at T0, while the other switches SW1, SW2 and SW3 remain open, except for the bypass switch SW5 which may be closed as well to provide for a current path for current I2. Closing SW4 causes VP to rise to the magnitude V4 of voltage source 41. Next, at T1, SW1 is closed causing VP to rise to level V1. SW4 is advantageously opened somewhat after T1, since V4 is lower than V1 and due to the presence of diode D4. The magnitude V1 is advantageously selected to make the substrate voltage VS positive.


To start a new processing period TP following the substrate discharge period TD, VS is made negative again. To do so, switch SW1 and advantageously also SW4 are opened, e.g. at time T2, and somewhat later, at T3, switch SW3 is closed causing the voltage VP to fall to the magnitude V3 of voltage source 31, until switch SW2 is closed at time T4 connecting the output node to ground potential (causing a (further) drop of VP) since switch SW5 remains closed until a later time T5. This marks the beginning of the processing period TP. The magnitudes V3, V4 and V1 are advantageously maintained constant during closure of the respective switches, and the magnitude may be continuously constant throughout operation.


At T5, SW5 is opened while SW2 is kept closed. This causes the output node 14 to be connected to the current source 51 and current I2 will effect a voltage ramp down of VP advantageously allowing to maintain the substrate voltage VS at a constant level, by compensating for the charge build up on the substrate and/or substrate stage. Just prior to starting a new discharge period, bypass switch SW5 is closed at time T7, advantageously somewhat after opening switch SW2 at time T6.


Switch SW3 can be opened at some time past T4 and possibly even past T5 due to diode D3. Note that there is advantageously no dead time required between SW4 and SW1 (due to diode D4) and between SW3 and SW2 (due to diode D3). The dead time T3−T2 is required to prevent short circuiting of V1 and V3.


The power stage 11 as described herein allows to be operated (by generating appropriate switching control signals for switches SW1-SW5) in such a way to minimize the oscillations on the output and to prevent parasitic resonance in the system. To this end, the power stage is advantageously operated such that the current through L1 is brought to 0 A at the end of a commutation period. In the waveform of FIG. 8, there are basically two commutation periods. A first commutation is during a voltage rise phase, in particular starting at T0, i.e. the closure of SW4, and ending at T1, i.e. the closure of SW1. A second commutation is during a voltage drop phase. This commutation period starts at T3, i.e. the closure of SW3 and ends at T4, i.e. the closure of SW2.


To ensure that the current through L1 can be brought to 0 A at end of a commutation period, in particular at T4, and advantageously also at T1, the instants T1 and T4 in which the switches SW1 respectively SW2 are closed (or equivalently the switching intervals T1−T0 and T4−T3), are advantageously appropriately selected. If the switch (SW1 or SW2) closes too late, an oscillation between L1 and the voltage VP on the output node 14 is induced due to a capacitance on the output node 14 and the fact that the voltage on this capacitance is not equal to the voltage on C4. If the switch (SW1 or SW2) closes too early the current through L1 is not 0 A and this will cause a ringing between L1 and C4. The criticality of selecting the appropriate switching time is shown in FIGS. 11 and 12. In FIGS. 11 and 12, T0 and T1 represent the instants at which control signals are applied to switches SW4 and SW1 to close the respective switch. In practice, the switches will have a finite switching speed which is shown in FIGS. 11 and 12 by a finite dV/dt on the voltage VP at the output node 14. As a result, the switch SW4 will start closing at T0 and the closed state will be achieved at instant TSW4. Similarly, switch SW1 starts closing at T1 and the closed state will be achieved at instant TSW1.


As can be seen from FIG. 11, the closed state of switch SW1 is achieved at an instant TSW1 at which the current IL1 through L1 has fallen to zero, and oscillation of the voltage at the substrate stage VT or at the substrate VS is prevented. This is not the case in FIG. 12, where the closed state of SW1 (TSW1) is achieved at an instant in which IL1 is not zero at TSW1.


In addition to the above, oscillation is advantageously prevented by appropriate selection of the voltage level applied during a commutation period (V3 respectively V4). The voltage level advantageously falls between the voltage level at commutation start (instants T0 and T3 respectively) and the voltage level at commutation end (instants T1 and T4 respectively). It can be shown that an optimal voltage level of V3 and V4 equals (VEND COMMUTATION+VSTART COMMUTATION)/2. In other words, an optimal magnitude of V3 is the average of VP at T0 and T1. An optimal magnitude of V4 is the average of VP at T3 and T4.


When the load of the BVG 10 as seen at output node 14 can be modeled as a series LC circuit with reactor inductance L1 and total capacitance C4 as shown in FIG. 5, the optimal commutation time TCOMMUTATION equaling T1−T0 and T4−T3 respectively can be set as TCOMMUTATION=π√{square root over (L1C4)} where C4 represents the equivalent capacitance as seen from output node 14, e.g. the total of C1, C2 and C3 in the model of FIG. 2. More generally, it can be stated that the optimal commutation time TCOMMUTATION assuming ideal conditions corresponds to half the period corresponding to the fundamental natural frequency f0 (resonant frequency) of the load, or TCOMMUTATION=0.5/f0.


In the above it is assumed that all components, e.g. switches, diodes, and the lumped model of the plasma reactor are ideal and lossless. Since this will not correspond to a real situation, the commutation parameters can be further adapted to take non-ideal situations into account. One may start operation based on the values for the commutation parameters (commutation time, commutation voltage) as determined above. During operation, one or more of these commutation parameters are advantageously adapted by implementing an appropriate process control, e.g. through a closed loop control algorithm, e.g. based on current feedback. Referring to FIG. 9, the BVG 10 comprises a controller 16 configured to control operation of the power stage 11. In particular, controller 16 is configured to output switch control signals 161 to control operation of switches SW1 through SW5. Controller 16 can be configured to output voltage setpoints 162 to set the magnitude of one or more of DC voltage sources 21, 31, 41 and possibly 52. Controller 16 can further be configured to output a current setpoint 163 to set the level of DC current I2 output by current source 51. Alternatively, one or more of the DC voltage sources 21, 31, 41 and 52, and/or current source 51 can have a voltage or current output of fixed magnitude.


Controller 16 advantageously comprises a feedback control loop, advantageously a current feedback control loop 164. Current control loop 164 comprises a current sensor 165 configured to measure the current output by the power stage 11. Current sensor 165 can be arranged at output node 14. Controller 16 can comprise a first input 167 coupled to current control loop 164, which is configured to feed the value of the output current measured by current sensor 165 to the controller 16. Through a second input 166, controller 16 can be configured to receive setpoints for one or more of the switch control signals 161, the voltage setpoints 162 and the current setpoint 163. These setpoints can be received from a system host controller or user interface, which may be configured to determine the setpoints based on a model of the load of the BVG 10, e.g. as determined in the previous paragraphs. Controller 16 may be configured to adjust the setpoints, in particular switch control signals 161 and/or voltage setpoints 162, based on the input 167 fed back from the current sensor 165.


Referring to FIG. 10, to improve control of the commutation period and make the commutation less sensitive to the closing moment of SW1 or SW2 in case of reactors with a high self-resonance frequency (e.g. low C4 and/or low L1), commutation inductors L3 and L4 can be added in series with commutation switches SW3 and SW4. Alternatively, or in addition, an inductor can be added series with the output blocking capacitor C1 (not shown).


The diagram of FIG. 10 additionally comprises an overvoltage protection circuit, implemented through diode DFW and a bidirectional transient voltage suppressor TVSFW allowing to protect an overvoltage between SW4 and L4.


Referring to FIG. 13, an overvoltage protection circuit 17 can be provided at the output of the power stage 11 or BVG 10 and configured to protect the power stage 11 by clamping the output voltage. Possible implementations of the overvoltage protection circuit are shown in FIGS. 14 and 15. The overvoltage protection circuit can comprise a diode D1 between output node 14 and the voltage source 21. Between output node 14 and earth potential, a diode D2 and unidirectional transient voltage suppressor TVS1 are coupled in opposite current direction. When a current through the clamping diodes and/or TVS is detected by current measurement sensors 171, 172 or 173, the power stage 11 can be turned off to reduce losses.


Referring to FIGS. 16 and 17, in an alternative embodiment of power stage 110 for the BVG 10, current source 51 is coupled between the output node 14 and the output terminal 12, advantageously between output node 14 and output blocking capacitor C1. This allows to have a continuous compensation current I2, although the voltage across current source 51 will be higher than for power stage 11. In power stage 110, the bypass switch SW5 can be omitted, even though switch SW2 should have bidirectional voltage blocking and current conduction capability.

Claims
  • 1. A method of generating a voltage waveform at an output, the method comprising: providing a first DC voltage having a first magnitude (V1), a second DC current (I) having a second magnitude, a third DC voltage having a third magnitude (V3), and a fourth DC voltage having a fourth magnitude (V4), wherein the first (V1) magnitude is higher than the third (V3) and the fourth (V4) magnitude,coupling the fourth DC voltage to the output followed by coupling the first DC voltage to the output, to bring an output voltage (Vp) at the output to a high level,decoupling the first DC voltage from the output, followed by coupling the third DC voltage to the output, to obtain a drop of the output voltage (Vp),coupling a ground potential (V0) to the output following coupling the third DC voltage, andcoupling the second DC current (I2) to the output following coupling the ground potential, wherein the second DC current ramps down the output voltage (Vp).
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first (V1), third (V3) and fourth (V4) magnitudes are constant during coupling of the respective DC voltage to the output.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein one or both of: the third magnitude (V3) and the fourth magnitude (V4) are higher than the ground potential (V0).
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the third magnitude (V3) and the fourth magnitude (V4) are different.
  • 5. The method of to claim 1, further comprising coupling the output to a processing platform supporting a substrate which is plasma processed, wherein the voltage waveform causes a positive voltage peak followed by a negative voltage at an exposed surface of the substrate.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising one or a combination of: selecting a commutation time (TCOMMUTATION) between the step of coupling the fourth DC voltage and the step of coupling the first DC voltage and selecting a commutation time between the step of coupling the third DC voltage and the step of coupling the ground potential (V0) to obtain a zero current between the output and the processing platform at an instant (TSW1) of coupling the first DC voltage and an instant of coupling the ground potential (V0) respectively.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, further comprising one or a combination of: selecting a commutation time (TCOMMUTATION) between the step of coupling the fourth DC voltage and the step of coupling the first DC voltage and selecting a commutation time between the step of coupling the third DC voltage and the step of coupling the ground potential (V0), wherein the commutation time is representative of 0.5/f0, wherein f0 is a natural frequency of an electrical system of a plasma processing system as seen by the output.
  • 8. The method of any claim 5, further comprising measuring a current between the output and the processing platform, and adapting one or more of: a commutation time (TCOMMUTATION) between the step of coupling the fourth DC voltage and the step of coupling the first DC voltage,a commutation time between the step of coupling the third DC voltage and the step of coupling the ground potential (V0),the third magnitude (V3), andthe fourth magnitude (V4).
  • 9. The method of claim 1, comprising one or a combination of: selecting the fourth magnitude (V4) to be representative of an average of:the output voltage (Vp) at an instant (T0) of coupling the fourth DC voltage to the output andthe output voltage (Vp) at an instant (T1) of coupling the first DC voltage to the output, andselecting the third magnitude (V3) to be representative of an average of:the output voltage (Vp) at an instant (T3) of coupling the third DC voltage to the output andthe output voltage (Vp) at an instant (T4) of coupling the ground potential (V0) to the output.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, comprising one or a combination of: uncoupling the fourth DC voltage following the coupling of the first DC voltage and uncoupling the third DC voltage following the coupling of the second DC current.
  • 11. A voltage waveform generator for a plasma processing apparatus, the voltage waveform generator comprising a power stage and a controller, wherein the power stage comprises: an output node,a first DC power supply coupled to the output node through a first switch (SW1), wherein the first DC power supply is configured to output a voltage of a first magnitude (V1),a second DC power supply coupled to the output node and configured to provide a current (I2) of second magnitude, anda ground terminal coupled to the output node through a second switch (SW2, SW5),wherein the power stage further comprises:a third DC power supply coupled to the output node through a third switch (SW3), wherein the third DC power supply is configured to output a voltage of a third magnitude (V3), anda fourth DC power supply coupled to the output node through a fourth switch (SW4), wherein the fourth DC power supply is configured to output a voltage of a fourth magnitude (V4),wherein the first, third and fourth DC power supplies are coupled in parallel to the output node,wherein the first magnitude (V1) is larger than the third magnitude (V3) and the fourth magnitude (V4),wherein the controller is configured to control actuation of the first (SW1), second (SW2, SW5), third (SW3) and fourth (SW4) switches to obtain a predetermined voltage waveform at the output node.
  • 12. The voltage waveform generator of claim 11, wherein the controller is configured to consecutively close the fourth switch (SW4), the first switch (SW1), the third switch (SW3), and the second switch (SW2, SW5) in that order, to obtain a voltage pulse at the output node.
  • 13. The voltage waveform generator of claim 12, wherein the controller is configured to open the first switch (SW1) prior to closing the third switch (SW3).
  • 14. The voltage waveform generator of any claim 11, wherein the second DC power supply is configured to draw the current (I2) having a positive second magnitude from the output node.
  • 15. The voltage waveform generator of any claim 11, wherein the second DC power supply is coupled to the output node through a fifth switch (SW2, SW5), the controller being configured to operate the fifth switch.
  • 16. The voltage waveform generator of claim 15, wherein the controller is configured to close the fifth switch following closing of the second switch.
  • 17. The voltage waveform generator of claim 15, comprising a bypass switch (SW5) and a process switch (SW2) connected in series between the ground terminal and the output node, wherein the second DC power source is coupled to a node between the bypass switch and the process switch, wherein the controller is configured to operate the bypass switch and the process switch such that when the bypass switch (SW5) is closed, the process switch (SW2) forms the second switch, and when the bypass switch (SW5) is open, the process switch (SW2) forms the fifth switch.
  • 18. The voltage waveform generator of any claim 11, comprising a current control loop coupled to the controller, wherein the current control loop comprises a current measurement sensor operable to measure a current at output node, and wherein the controller is configured to adjust one or more of: a switching time of one or more of the first (SW1), second (SW2, SW5), third (SW3) and fourth (SW4) switches, anda setpoint of one or more of the third (V3) and fourth (V4) magnitudes, on the basis of a value determined by current measurement sensor.
  • 19. The voltage waveform generator of any claim 11, comprising one or a combination of: a commutation inductor (L3, L4) coupled between the third switch (SW3) and the output node and a commutation inductor coupled between the fourth switch (SW4) and the output node.
  • 20. An apparatus for plasma processing, comprising: an arrangement for configured to generate a plasma;a processing platform for configured to support a substrate to be processed by the plasma; andthe voltage waveform generator of claim 11, wherein the output node is electrically connected to the processing platform.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2022999 Apr 2019 NL national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2020/061088 4/21/2020 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/216741 10/29/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
9208992 Brouk Dec 2015 B2
10607813 Fairbairn Mar 2020 B2
11264209 Van Zyl Mar 2022 B2
11670487 Nguyen Jun 2023 B1
20120081350 Sano Apr 2012 A1
20120228263 Ui et al. Sep 2012 A1
20140062303 Hoffman Mar 2014 A1
20180032100 Kim et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180226225 Koh et al. Aug 2018 A1
20220020567 Koshimizu Jan 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0987818 Mar 2000 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from the European Receiving Office in PCT/EP2020/061088, dated Jul. 3, 2020, which is an international application corresponding to this U.S. application.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220223377 A1 Jul 2022 US