The invention relates generally to semiconductor fabrication technology and, more particularly, to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) processing and associated apparatus for reducing temperature non-uniformities on semiconductor wafer surfaces.
In the fabrication of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and other high-performance devices such as laser diodes, optical detectors, and field effect transistors, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process is typically used to grow a thin film stack structure using materials such as gallium nitride over a sapphire or silicon substrate. A CVD tool includes a process chamber, which is a sealed environment that allows infused gases to be deposited upon the substrate (typically in the form of wafers) to grow the thin film layers. An example of a current product line of such manufacturing equipment is the TurboDisc® family of MOCVD systems, manufactured by Veeco Instruments Inc. of Plainview, N.Y.
A number of process parameters are controlled, such as temperature, pressure and gas flow rate, to achieve a desired crystal growth. Different layers are grown using varying materials and process parameters. For example, devices formed from compound semiconductors such as III-V semiconductors typically are formed by growing successive layers of the compound semiconductor using metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). In this process, the wafers are exposed to a combination of gases, typically including a metal organic compound as a source of a group III metal, and also including a source of a group V element which flow over the surface of the wafer while the wafer is maintained at an elevated temperature. Typically, the metal organic compound and group V source are combined with a carrier gas which does not participate appreciably in the reaction as, for example, nitrogen. One example of a III-V semiconductor is gallium nitride, which can be formed by reaction of an organo-gallium compound and ammonia on a substrate having a suitable crystal lattice spacing, as for example, a sapphire wafer. Typically, the wafer is maintained at a temperature on the order of 1000-1100° C. during deposition of gallium nitride and related compounds.
In a MOCVD process, where the growth of crystals occurs by chemical reaction on the surface of the substrate, the process parameters must be controlled with particular care to ensure that the chemical reaction proceeds under the required conditions. Even small variations in process conditions can adversely affect device quality and production yield. For instance, if a gallium and indium nitride layer is deposited, variations in wafer surface temperature will cause variations in the composition and bandgap of the deposited layer. Because indium has a relatively high vapor pressure, the deposited layer will have a lower proportion of indium and a greater bandgap in those regions of the wafer where the surface temperature is higher. If the deposited layer is an active, light-emitting layer of an LED structure, the emission wavelength of the LEDs formed from the wafer will also vary to an unacceptable degree.
In a MOCVD process chamber, semiconductor wafers on which layers of thin film are to be grown are placed on rapidly-rotating carousels, referred to as wafer carriers, to provide a uniform exposure of their surfaces to the atmosphere within the reactor chamber for the deposition of the semiconductor materials. Rotation speed is on the order of 1,000 RPM. The wafer carriers are typically machined out of a highly thermally conductive material such as graphite, and are often coated with a protective layer of a material such as silicon carbide. Each wafer carrier has a set of circular indentations, or pockets, in its top surface in which individual wafers are placed. Typically, the wafers are supported in spaced relationship to the bottom surface of each of the pockets to permit the flow of gas around the edges of the wafer. Some examples of pertinent technology are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0040097, U.S. Pat. No. 8,092,599, U.S. Pat. No. 8,021,487, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0186853, U.S. Pat. No. 6,902,623, U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,252, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,492,625, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The wafer carrier is supported on a spindle within the reaction chamber so that the top surface of the wafer carrier having the exposed surfaces of the wafers faces upwardly toward a gas distribution device. While the spindle is rotated, the gas is directed downwardly onto the top surface of the wafer carrier and flows across the top surface toward the periphery of the wafer carrier. The used gas is evacuated from the reaction chamber through ports disposed below the wafer carrier. The wafer carrier is maintained at the desired elevated temperature by heating elements, typically electrical resistive heating elements disposed below the bottom surface of the wafer carrier. These heating elements are maintained at a temperature above the desired temperature of the wafer surfaces, whereas the gas distribution device typically is maintained at a temperature well below the desired reaction temperature so as to prevent premature reaction of the gases. Therefore, heat is transferred from the heating elements to the bottom surface of the wafer carrier and flows upwardly through the wafer carrier to the individual wafers. Also, the heat transferred upwards through the carrier material is radiated from the top surface of the wafer carrier. The degree of radiative emission from the wafer carrier is determined by the emissivity of the carrier and the surrounding components.
A great deal of effort has been devoted to system design features to minimize temperature variations during processing; however, the problem continues to present many challenges. For instance, wafers are significantly less thermally conductive than the wafer carrier. Introducing a sapphire wafer in a pocket of the wafer carrier creates a heat-trapping, or “blanketing” effect. This phenomenon results in a generally radial thermal profile at the pocket floor which is hotter in the center and lower temperature towards the outer radius of the pocket, where the heat can be emitted by radiation and convection into the environment.
Another effect that impacts thermal uniformity of the wafers in-process is the thermal gradient across the thickness of the wafer, which causes a concave bow, resulting in a non-uniform gap distance between the wafer bottom and pocket floor. This is because the hotter bottom of the wafer tends to expand more in relation to the colder top surface, thereby assuming a classical concave shape. The concave bow will generally add to the thermal non-uniformity that already exists on the wafer due to thermal blanketing effects. Due to the very small thermal conductance of the gas gap compared to the carrier material, the wafer surface temperature is extremely sensitive to changes in the gap magnitude. In the case of a concave bow, the center of the wafer will be closer to the pocket floor, and consequently hotter compared to the outer edges. This effect is more pronounced in larger-diameter wafers, which are typically made from silicon. Also, with silicon wafers in particular, the bowing is further aggravated by film stresses from a crystal lattice mismatch between the silicon substrate and the deposited layers used to fabricate the devices on the substrate.
A related thermal conduction transfer process also occurs in the lateral direction from wafer carrier pocket edge to the wafer edge, depending upon this distance. In CVD tools utilizing a high-speed rotating wafer carrier, the wafers are typically driven towards the outer edge of the pockets due to high centrifugal forces. Thus, these wafers are in typically in contact with the outer pocket edge. The non-concentric position of a wafer in the pocket creates a non-uniform gap from the pocket edge that is zero at the point of contact, and increases circumferentially away from the contact point. The smaller gap between the wafer and carrier in regions close to the point of contact increases the conductive heat transfer from the carrier to the wafer. This “close proximity” effect results in much higher edge temperatures in the region of contact. Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/450,062, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, describes approaches for reducing the proximity effect utilizing “bumpers” to center the wafer at a prescribed distance from the pocket edge. These bumpers have been shown to be successful in virtually eliminating the high temperature crescent generated by the proximity effect. However, several practical challenges remain, particularly
Another challenge in maintaining temperature uniformity over the wafers relates to the wafers, which are typically circular, flat discs, having one or more straight portions of their edge commonly referred to as “flats.” Flats are generally used to indicate the doping type of the wafer, as well as the crystallographic orientation of the wafer, and are typically found on wafers smaller than 200 mm. In CVD processing, however, the flats present a non-uniformity for heat transfer to the wafer. In particular, the heat transfer to the portion of the wafer near the flat tends to be reduced due to the separation between the edge of the wafer flat and the wafer carrier. Also, the flat introduces a variation in gas flow that also affects the temperature in the vicinity of the flat.
A further concern relates to multi-wafer pocket geometries with non-concentric pocket locations. Here, the thermal profile becomes more complicated as the convective cooling is dependent upon the historical gas streamline path passing over both the wafer carrier and wafer regions. For high-speed rotating disc reactors, the gas streamlines spiral outward from inner to outer radius in a generally tangential direction. In this case, when the gas streamline is passing over the exposed portion of the wafer carrier (such as the regions of “webs” between the wafers), it is heated up relative to the regions where it is passing over the wafers. In general, these webs are quite hot relative to the other regions of the carrier where the wafers are situated, as the heat flux streamlines due to the blanketing effect have channeled the streamlines into this region. Thus, the gas paths passing over the webs create a tangential gradient in temperature due to the convective cooling, which is hotter at the leading edge (entry of the fluid streamline to the wafer) relative to the trailing edge (exit of the fluid streamline over the wafer).
These effects contribute to a reduced product yield since devices fabricated from portions of the wafer near the flat tend to exhibit increased photoluminescence relative to the target value for the rest of the wafer. Solutions are needed that addresses one or more of these, and related, challenges in improving wafer heating uniformity in CVD reactors.
Aspects of the invention are directed to a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system in which thermal non-uniformities along the edges of the wafers are significantly reduced. In one aspect, a wafer carrier has a body formed symmetrically about a central axis, and including a generally planar top surface that is situated perpendicularly to the central axis. At least one wafer retention pocket is recessed in the wafer carrier body from the top surface. Each one wafer retention pocket includes a floor surface and a peripheral wall surface that surrounds the floor surface and defines a periphery of that wafer retention pocket, the wafer retention pocket is adapted to retain a wafer within the periphery when subjected to rotation about the central axis. A thermally-insulating spacer is situated at least partially in the at least one wafer retention pocket and arranged to maintain a spacing between the peripheral wall surface and the wafer. The spacer is constructed from a material having a thermal conductivity less than a thermal conductivity of the wafer carrier body such that the spacer limits heat conduction from portions of the wafer carrier body to the wafer. A spacer retention feature is formed in the wafer carrier body that engages with the spacer and includes a surface oriented to prevent centrifugal movement of the spacer when subjected to rotation about the central axis.
In another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for forming the wafer carrier. In the method, a wafer carrier body is formed that is symmetric about a central axis. A generally planar top surface is formed in the body that is situated perpendicularly to the central axis. A plurality of wafer retention pockets are formed, with each of the pockets being recessed in the body from the top surface. In the pockets there is a floor surface and a peripheral wall surface that surrounds the floor surface and defines a periphery of that wafer retention pocket. The wafer retention pocket is adapted to retain a wafer within the periphery when subjected to rotation about the central axis.
The method further comprises situating a thermally-insulating spacer at least partially in the at least one wafer retention pocket to maintain a spacing between the peripheral wall surface and the wafer. The spacer is constructed from a material having a thermal conductivity less than a thermal conductivity of the wafer carrier body such that the spacer limits heat conduction from portions of the wafer carrier body to the wafer. A spacer retention feature is formed in the wafer carrier body such that the spacer retention feature engages with the spacer and provides a surface oriented to prevent centrifugal movement of the spacer when subjected to rotation about the central axis.
In related aspects of the invention, the wafer carrier is part of an apparatus for growing epitaxial layers on one or more wafers by chemical vapor deposition that includes a reaction chamber, a rotatable spindle having an upper end disposed inside the reaction chamber, where the wafer carrier is centrally and detachably mounted on an upper end of the spindle and is in contact therewith at least in the course of a CVD process.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Gas distribution device 12 is connected to sources 14a, 14b, 14c for supplying process gases to be used in the wafer treatment process, such as a carrier gas and reactant gases such as a metalorganic compound and a source of a group V metal. The gas distribution device 12 is arranged to receive the various gases and direct a flow of process gasses generally in the downward direction. The gas distribution device 12 desirably is also connected to a coolant system 16 arranged to circulate a liquid through the gas distribution device so as to maintain the temperature of the gas distribution device at a desired temperature during operation. A similar coolant arrangement (not shown) can be provided for cooling the walls of chamber 8. Chamber 8 is also equipped with an exhaust system 18 arranged to remove spent gases from the interior of the chamber through ports (not shown) at or near the bottom of the chamber so as to permit continuous flow of gas in the downward direction from the gas distribution device.
A spindle 20 is arranged within the chamber so that the central axis 22 of the spindle extends in the upward and downward directions. The spindle is mounted to the chamber by a conventional rotary pass-through device 25 incorporating bearings and seals (not shown) so that the spindle can rotate about axis 22, while maintaining a seal between the spindle and the wall of chamber 8. The spindle has a fitting 24 at its top end, i.e., at the end of the spindle closest to the gas distribution device 12. As further discussed below, fitting 24 is an example of a wafer carrier retention mechanism adapted to releasably engage a wafer carrier. In the particular embodiment depicted, the fitting 24 is a generally frustoconical element tapering toward the top end of the spindle and terminating at a flat top surface. A frustoconical element is an element having the shape of a frustum of a cone. Spindle 20 is connected to a rotary drive mechanism 26 such as an electric motor drive, which is arranged to rotate the spindle about axis 22.
A heating element 70 is mounted within the chamber and surrounds spindle 20 below fitting 24. The chamber is also provided with an entry opening 72 leading to an antechamber 76, and a door 74 for closing and opening the entry opening. Door 74 is depicted only schematically in
The apparatus also includes a plurality of wafer carriers 80. In the operating condition shown in
In operation, a wafer 124, such as a disc-like wafer formed from sapphire, silicon carbide, or other crystalline substrate, is disposed within each pocket 90 of each wafer carrier 80. Typically, the wafer 124 has a thickness which is small in comparison to the dimensions of its major surfaces. For example, a circular wafer of about 2 inches (50 mm) in diameter may be about 430 μm thick or less. As illustrated in
In a typical MOCVD process, a wafer carrier 80 with wafers loaded thereon is loaded from antechamber 76 into chamber 8 and placed in the operative position shown in
Heaters 70 transfer heat to the bottom surface 90 of the wafer carrier, principally by radiant heat transfer. The heat applied to the bottom surface of the wafer carrier flows upwardly through the body 82 of the wafer carrier to the top surface 88 of the wafer carrier. Heat passing upwardly through the body also passes upwardly through gaps to the bottom surface of each wafer, and upwardly through the wafer to the top surface 126 of the wafer. Heat is radiated from the top surface 88 of the wafer carrier and from the top surfaces 126 of the wafer to the colder elements of the process chamber as, for example, to the walls of the process chamber and to the gas distribution device 12. Heat is also transferred from the top surface 88 of the wafer carrier and the top surfaces 126 of the wafers to the process gas passing over these surfaces.
In the embodiment depicted, the system includes a number of features designed to determine uniformity of heating of the surfaces 126 of each wafer 124. In this embodiment, temperature profiling system 130 receives temperature information 122 that can include a temperature and temperature monitoring positional information from temperature monitor 120. In addition, temperature profiling system 130 receives wafer carrier positional information, which in one embodiment can come from rotary drive mechanism 26. With this information, temperature profiling system 130 constructs a temperature profile of the wafers 124 on wafer carrier 80. The temperature profile represents a thermal distribution on the surface 126 of each of the wafers 124.
One aspect of the invention is directed to the addition of a thermally-insulating spacer, as partially illustrated in
Another feature of spacer 100 is its heat-insulating characteristic. Since heat transfer to the wafer occurs primarily from heat flowing though the body of wafer carrier 80, the thermally-insulating characteristic in the present context means that the thermal conductivity of spacer 100 is less than the thermal conductivity of wafer carrier 80. Thus, spacer 100 not only provides separation between the wafer and the peripheral (and, optionally, the floor) surfaces of the wafer carrier, but also spacer 100 limits the conductive heat transfer between the wafer carrier surface(s) and the outer edge of the wafer.
In one type of embodiment, when wafer carrier 80 is made primarily from graphite, spacer 100 is made from a ceramic material such as sapphire, quartz, aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, silicon, gallium nitride, gallium arsenide, or other suitable material that can withstand applicable process temperatures, that has a suitable thermal expansion coefficient, and that has a thermal conductivity less than graphite.
In a related embodiment, wafer carrier 80 has one or more spacer retention features that are adapted to engage with each spacer 100. The spacer retention features according to various embodiments can have a variety of structures, though in an important aspect, certain embodiments of the spacer retention features are specifically constructed to retain the spacers 100 while subjected to process conditions involving lateral forces due to the rotation of wafer carrier 80. Notably, significant centrifugal forces are exerted by the wafer being forced in an outward radial direction from the central axis 84 against one or more of the spacers 100. This force, in turn, is opposed by the spacer and the spacer retention features of wafer carrier 80. According to one embodiment, the spacer and the spacer retention feature cooperate to form a bracing arrangement that locks the spacer in place in response to an applied centrifugal force along an outward radial direction from the central axis.
In another related embodiment, the spacer has an upper portion that laterally extends along the top surface of the wafer carrier in a direction away from the center of the pocket. This configuration advantageously provides heat insulating properties for the top surface of the wafer carrier that is not beneath a wafer, thereby improving heat flux uniformity within the wafer carrier body and, ultimately, the in-process heating uniformity of the wafers.
In other embodiments, any suitable profile may be used. Also, in other embodiments, the protrusion 200d may be omitted. In this latter case, the peripheral wall surface surrounding the floor surface of pocket 92d can function as a spacer retention feature.
In a variation of this embodiment, as depicted schematically in
As a variation to the embodiments described with reference to
In a related aspect of the invention, provisions are made for improving wafer edge-to-edge heating uniformity for wafers that have one or more flat edges, or flats.
The embodiments above are intended to be illustrative and not limiting. Other variations are contemplated to fall within the claims. In addition, although aspects of the present invention have been described with reference to particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the scope of the invention, as defined by the claims.
Persons of ordinary skill in the relevant arts will recognize that the invention may comprise fewer features than illustrated in any individual embodiment described above. The embodiments described herein are not meant to be an exhaustive presentation of the ways in which the various features of the invention may be combined. Accordingly, the embodiments are not mutually exclusive combinations of features; rather, the invention may comprise a combination of different individual features selected from different individual embodiments, as will be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art.
Any incorporation by reference of documents above is limited such that no subject matter is incorporated that is contrary to the explicit disclosure herein. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is further limited such that no claims that are included in the documents are incorporated by reference into the claims of the present application. The claims of any of the documents are, however, incorporated as part of the disclosure herein, unless specifically excluded. Any incorporation by reference of documents above is yet further limited such that any definitions provided in the documents are not incorporated by reference herein unless expressly included herein.
For purposes of interpreting the claims for the present invention, it is expressly intended that the provisions of Section 112, sixth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. are not to be invoked unless the specific terms “means for” or “step for” are recited in a claim.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3754110 | van Dongen et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3892940 | Bloem et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3993018 | Kranik et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4512841 | Cunningham, Jr. et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4898639 | Moe et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5119541 | Ohmi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5155652 | Logan et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5195729 | Thomas et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5242501 | McDiarmid | Sep 1993 | A |
5403401 | Haafkens et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5531835 | Fodor et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5556476 | Lei et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5626678 | Sahin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5761023 | Lue et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800622 | Takemi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820686 | Moore | Oct 1998 | A |
5837058 | Chen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840124 | Gurary | Nov 1998 | A |
6001183 | Gurary | Dec 1999 | A |
6074696 | Sato | Jun 2000 | A |
6092623 | Collavino | Jul 2000 | A |
6126382 | Scales et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146464 | Beinglass et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6188838 | Mikata et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6287386 | Perlov et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6375741 | Reardon et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6391802 | Delpech et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6454865 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6492625 | Boguslavskiy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506252 | Boguslavskiy et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6634882 | Goodman | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6685774 | Boguslayskiy et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6726769 | Boguslayskiy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729875 | Goodman | May 2004 | B2 |
6840767 | Goodman | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6902623 | Gurary et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7070660 | Keeton et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7235139 | Boguslavskiy et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256375 | Oosterlaken | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276124 | Gurary et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279048 | Shinma et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7331780 | Adachi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
D600221 | Sato | Sep 2009 | S |
D600222 | Sato | Sep 2009 | S |
7601224 | Foree | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7625205 | Sasamjima et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7959735 | Sterling et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8021487 | Boguslavskiy et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8092599 | Sferlazzo et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8372204 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
9017483 | Fujikawa et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20020018506 | Vogler | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020106826 | Boguslayskiy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020185062 | Halpin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197144 | Blank et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030089457 | Nallan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040011293 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011780 | Sun et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040187790 | Bader et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050051099 | Preti et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060076108 | Holland et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115968 | Funk | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060180076 | Kanaya et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191483 | Blomiley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060245906 | Pelzmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070026148 | Arai et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070186853 | Gurary et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218664 | Ito et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080124470 | Van Den Berg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090155028 | Boguslavskiy et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162952 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100055318 | Volf | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116210 | Kato et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100282170 | Nishizawa | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110049779 | Egami | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110129947 | Mangum | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206843 | Gurary | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120040097 | Volf et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120309191 | Miura | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130065403 | Paranjpe | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130092595 | Chang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130186113 | Chung et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130276704 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140261187 | Krishnan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287142 | Boyd et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140360430 | Armour et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150118009 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 615 259 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 720 200 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1965412 | Sep 2008 | EP |
708477 | Jan 2013 | EP |
60-173852 | Sep 1985 | JP |
S63-096912 | Apr 1988 | JP |
01-256118 | Oct 1989 | JP |
04-123265 | Apr 1992 | JP |
05029230 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H5-275355 | Oct 1993 | JP |
5-335253 | Dec 1993 | JP |
6-010140 | Jan 1994 | JP |
7-074114 | Mar 1995 | JP |
10-060674 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-087394 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10144758 | May 1998 | JP |
10-167885 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-167886 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000-355766 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-126995 | May 2001 | JP |
2003-037071 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004-128271 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-327761 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-136025 | May 2005 | JP |
2005232488 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2007-251078 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2009088088 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2010028013 | Feb 2010 | JP |
10-2007-0019689 | Feb 2007 | KR |
20120090676 | Aug 2012 | KR |
WO 2001007691 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2005081298 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006088448 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007105877 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007122147 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2014062000 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014062002 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Generated English Translation of KR20120090676A. Published Aug. 2012. |
Taiwanese Office Action for Taiwanese Application No. 103204332 dated Oct. 3, 2014, English translation not provided. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/027773 dated Jul. 28, 2014. |
European Patent Application No. EP14762924.0, Partial Supplementary EP Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2016, 7 pages. |
EP Application No. 14762924.0, Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2017, 12 pages. |
CN Application No. 201480015658.8, First Office Action, dated Apr. 1, 2017, 13 pages. |
TW Application No. 103109201, Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/450,062, filed Apr. 18, 2012, Inventors Krishnan et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,768, filed Apr. 18, 2012, Inventors Krishnan et al. |
European Application No. 12193897.1, European Extended Search Report dated Sep. 15, 2016. |
European Application No. 121938989, European Extended Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2012. |
European Application No. 09810392, Supplemental Search Report dated Apr. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/237,948, filed Aug. 28, 2009, Egami et al. |
Int'l Application No. PCT/US09/04931 Search Report dated Apr. 15, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140261187 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |